OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
 Offline
Posts: 14538
|
 |
« Reply #90 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 19:09:11 » |
|
he sounds like a carbon copy of roberts when he signed. Indeed. That all describes Roberts down to a tee. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #91 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 19:59:56 » |
|
Meh.
I'm very underawed in that there's plenty of names I'd have over Luke Rodgers and I'm not panicking about losing anyone, anyone who goes including Lukas is utterly replacebale at this level, frankly.
Go lethargy.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Scot Munroe
|
|
« Reply #92 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 20:04:12 » |
|
He Rejected a move to hereford. I think it is a good signing. When he was a shrewsbury a lot of clubs were after him even a few Prem clubs aswell.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kaufman
|
|
« Reply #93 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 20:07:37 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32380
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #94 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 20:24:07 » |
|
pointless signing unless Roberts is actually going.
Doesnt seem to offer anything Roberts cant...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lebowski
|
|
« Reply #95 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 20:25:28 » |
|
presumably you've seen him play before writing him off completely?
otherwise that would be just stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #96 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 20:26:45 » |
|
Doesn't sound like we'll get him on that basis anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36319
|
|
« Reply #97 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 21:11:43 » |
|
We're signing flammableBen on a 2 year deal for 3 bottles of red wine a day. Luggy was hoping for a 3 year deal but he'll probably be dead by then.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
|
« Reply #98 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 21:13:29 » |
|
Likewise :?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 14538
|
|
« Reply #99 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 21:15:43 » |
|
pointless signing unless Roberts is actually going. Not if he sees Roberts as a winger, which would appear to be the case. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
red macca
|
|
« Reply #100 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 22:04:21 » |
|
very true ost
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Scot Munroe
|
|
« Reply #101 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 22:12:43 » |
|
That means ricky shakes will be leaving soon then if Roberts will be playing as winger.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
red macca
|
|
« Reply #102 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 22:14:15 » |
|
That means ricky shakes will be leaving soon then if Roberts will be playing as winger. in todays paper sturrock says he wants cover in all positions so no i doubt it as shakes covers both rb and rm now |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Scot Munroe
|
|
« Reply #103 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 22:18:33 » |
|
That means ricky shakes will be leaving soon then if Roberts will be playing as winger. in todays paper sturrock says he wants cover in all positions so no i doubt it as shakes covers both rb and rm now Fair enough Dean. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32380
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #104 on: Friday, January 5, 2007, 23:50:53 » |
|
plus he actually played bloody well Monday
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
