herthab
TEF Travel
 Offline
Posts: 12020
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Friday, December 8, 2006, 19:56:56 » |
|
I've got a good feeling that Lukas will score tomorrow....................
Mind you, I'm usually wrong................
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It's All Good..............
|
|
|
|
mattboyslim
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Friday, December 8, 2006, 19:57:03 » |
|
I make it 5 Reg, Smith J, Nicho, Peacock, Pook, and Shakesy. Or did I make it up that Shakes had scored for Town?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SwindonTownFC
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Friday, December 8, 2006, 19:57:50 » |
|
think peacock has 7
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Friday, December 8, 2006, 19:58:42 » |
|
That side could possibly be the most shot shy in STFC history....boasting as it does only 4 players who've ever scored a league goal, with a grand total of 13 between them. Peacock scored loads of goals for City, didn't he? Or did you mean league goals while playing for Swindon? If so, that is worryingly shit :| I reckon there's 11 Swindon league goals in that side but I can't be arsed to check. J Smith 1? Franchise Nicholas 1? I can only remember Stockport away Shakes 2? Swansea away and the cross at home this season? Pook 1? Grimsby Peacock 6? Ricky has 4....I overlooked Pook's effort v Mariners, so it should be 14 between them. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Friday, December 8, 2006, 19:59:10 » |
|
I make it 5 Reg, Smith J, Nicho, Peacock, Pook, and Shakesy. Or did I make it up that Shakes had scored for Town? Oh dear. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SwindonTownFC
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Friday, December 8, 2006, 19:59:11 » |
|
shakes has 4 league goals
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Friday, December 8, 2006, 20:00:33 » |
|
Can someone account for t'other 2?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Friday, December 8, 2006, 20:06:57 » |
|
I make it 5 Reg, Smith J, Nicho, Peacock, Pook, and Shakesy. Or did I make it up that Shakes had scored for Town? Yep its 5 scorers not 4.....as I said I overlooked Pook. Still its hypothetical as its DV 's side and he knows fuck all about football. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mattboyslim
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Friday, December 8, 2006, 20:07:45 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SwindonTownFC
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Friday, December 8, 2006, 20:09:40 » |
|
I make it 5 Reg, Smith J, Nicho, Peacock, Pook, and Shakesy. Or did I make it up that Shakes had scored for Town? Yep its 5 scorers not 4.....as I said I overlooked Pook. Still its hypothetical as its DV 's side and he knows fuck all about football. and his side is wrong, as i said Brownlie is starting |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Friday, December 8, 2006, 20:10:37 » |
|
Can someone account for t'other 2? Ricky scored a towering 1 yard header v Donny at teh CG....a goal at Swansea and another at Scunny towards the back end of last season |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Friday, December 8, 2006, 20:13:34 » |
|
I make it 5 Reg, Smith J, Nicho, Peacock, Pook, and Shakesy. Or did I make it up that Shakes had scored for Town? Yep its 5 scorers not 4.....as I said I overlooked Pook. Still its hypothetical as its DV 's side and he knows fuck all about football. and his side is wrong, as i said Brownlie is starting I don't think DV is claiming he's right, that's just his preference...... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SwindonTownFC
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Friday, December 8, 2006, 20:17:00 » |
|
I make it 5 Reg, Smith J, Nicho, Peacock, Pook, and Shakesy. Or did I make it up that Shakes had scored for Town? Yep its 5 scorers not 4.....as I said I overlooked Pook. Still its hypothetical as its DV 's side and he knows fuck all about football. and his side is wrong, as i said Brownlie is starting quote] oh ok, i read it wrong then  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
santini
Offline
Posts: 890
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Friday, December 8, 2006, 20:46:25 » |
|
Brownlie and Peacock still injured. He may change to a defensive formation with one up front who has to work his socks off, so that rules out Roberts. On Tuesday he was impressed with Lukas so may give him the start.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mattboyslim
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Friday, December 8, 2006, 20:49:18 » |
|
Bllody brave move IMHO, at least we'd have options to swtich to 442 if (when needed) think this is the least optimism I've gone into a game with for ages. I guess provided he doesn't change the defence and they get back to their best we'll have a chance.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
