While I reckon it would indeed be worth it if it meant keeping Wise and we would lose him otherwise, it would put a strange light on their "allegations" around the already committed overspend.
Why was it wrong for one senior club employee to spend money on things meant to improve our chances of promotion but ok for others? Obviously that's if money was offered, in fairness it says better terms, so maybe they offered everything bar cash (struggling to think what)
So.................. the board can qoute that Linda Birrell was released as a cost cutting measure (which severely pissed Dennis off !)
Then they turn around and offer increased terms.
All this when a 750k overspend has already been commented on in the media by Dennis
Would'nt you scratch your head ?