Chubbs
 Offline
Posts: 10517
|
 |
« Reply #165 on: Monday, September 11, 2006, 10:16:59 » |
|
If his mates anything like him i'd have run a mile.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BrightonRed
Offline
Posts: 1126
|
|
« Reply #166 on: Monday, September 11, 2006, 12:18:40 » |
|
Offside. If we weren't Swindon fans, we'd definately be saying Peacock was offside, good decision. Peacock didnt touch the ball Peacocks run didnt obstruct the keepers path to the ball Peacocks run didnt obstruct the defenders path to the ball Plus look where the linesman is standing, edge of the box....and Wrexham took the resulting free kick from Roberts starting position. Perfectly good goal.... My gut feeling is that the offside decision was correct so I'm gonna keep the ball rolling...! Interfering with an opponent means: Preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or movements or making a gesture or movement which, in the opinion of the referee, deceives or distracts an opponent.http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y98/trebblej82/1-1.jpgI think at this point to claim that Peacock isn't distracting the goalkeeper would be ludicrous considering either of them could have knocked the ball in.. Absolutely correct decision in my eyes. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
nicotine, valium, vicodin, marijuana, ecstasy and alcohol...
|
|
|
|
mr ian
|
|
« Reply #167 on: Monday, September 11, 2006, 12:59:53 » |
|
i think it would be best if we just terminate peacocks contract
he obviously just gets in the way
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Doore
|
|
« Reply #168 on: Monday, September 11, 2006, 13:14:29 » |
|
Its offside. End of.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
 Online
Posts: 32222
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #169 on: Monday, September 11, 2006, 16:06:51 » |
|
how on earth is Peacock obstructing the keeper, he's not in his line of sight between himself and the ball and he isnt blocking the keepers path to the ball
If anything, he's obstructing Roberts.... :shock:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
|
« Reply #170 on: Monday, September 11, 2006, 17:24:06 » |
|
how on earth is Peacock obstructing the keeper, he's not in his line of sight between himself and the ball and he isnt blocking the keepers path to the ball
If anything, he's obstructing Roberts.... :shock: Think that's sort of the point. It's much harder for the keeper if he doesn't know which one of them is going to do something. He has 2 players to read and not one. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Northern Red
|
|
« Reply #171 on: Monday, September 11, 2006, 17:39:04 » |
|
That picture shows it perfectly. 6 inches from the ball is active. Thus Peacock is offside.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16347
|
|
« Reply #172 on: Monday, September 11, 2006, 17:39:25 » |
|
i thought that the rules now said you cannot be given offside untill you've touched the ball. Peacock didn't touch the ball, therefore he wasn't offside. Then again, they change the rules as often as i change my boxers. :-))(
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
|
Northern Red
|
|
« Reply #173 on: Monday, September 11, 2006, 17:45:54 » |
|
4 changes in 12 years - you smelly cunt.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16347
|
|
« Reply #174 on: Monday, September 11, 2006, 20:04:30 » |
|
how verry dare you  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
stfc_steve
Offline
Posts: 465
|
|
« Reply #175 on: Monday, September 11, 2006, 20:24:02 » |
|
this offside rule is a joke, i went 2 wrexham n as u lot r sayin peacock was offside but roberts clearly wasnt. It cost us that game n if ur gonna give that as an offside u gonna have 2 look at the cisse predicament. These refs in this league r a joke :fu:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BrightonRed
Offline
Posts: 1126
|
|
« Reply #176 on: Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 12:24:16 » |
|
this offside rule is a joke, i went 2 wrexham n as u lot r sayin peacock was offside but roberts clearly wasnt. It cost us that game n if ur gonna give that as an offside u gonna have 2 look at the cisse predicament. These refs in this league r a joke :fu: Yes Peacock was offside.. and peacock was interfering with play.. therefore the goal was disallowed. Rightly. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
nicotine, valium, vicodin, marijuana, ecstasy and alcohol...
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Online
Posts: 32222
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #177 on: Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 16:32:54 » |
|
no he wasnt, he didnt touch the ball...which last I checked was the rules....linesman arent supposed to flag till the ball is touched.
Even Wrexham fans thought it should have been allowed!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BrightonRed
Offline
Posts: 1126
|
|
« Reply #178 on: Tuesday, September 12, 2006, 16:58:40 » |
|
no he wasnt, he didnt touch the ball...which last I checked was the rules....linesman arent supposed to flag till the ball is touched.
Even Wrexham fans thought it should have been allowed!!! He doesn't have to touch the ball I'm afraid: A player in an offside position is only penalised if, at the moment the ball touches or is played by one of his team, he is, in the opinion of the referee, involved in active play by: * interfering with play or * interfering with an opponent or * gaining an advantage by being in that position interfering with an opponentInterfering with an opponent means: Preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or movements or Making a gesture or movement which, in the opinion of the referee, deceives or distracts an opponent. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
nicotine, valium, vicodin, marijuana, ecstasy and alcohol...
|
|
|
|
