OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
 Offline
Posts: 14513
|
 |
« on: Tuesday, July 25, 2006, 15:25:46 » |
|
Just wondering.
It would seem sensible to have one and most teams seem to have them, even in t'Conference.
Where's Mr D???
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36318
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday, July 25, 2006, 15:29:41 » |
|
Nobody wants to sponsor us because we're shit
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 14513
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday, July 25, 2006, 15:36:40 » |
|
Oh. Right. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
The Grim Reaper
Offline
Posts: 1730
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday, July 25, 2006, 15:42:22 » |
|
Maybe when STFC renegotiated the deal with Nationwide, Nationwide wanted to be sole sponsors on both kits?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sippo
Living in the 80s
Offline
Posts: 15585
I ain't gettin on no plane fool
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday, July 25, 2006, 15:45:43 » |
|
Some teams had short sponsers aswell...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 11710
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday, July 25, 2006, 15:51:52 » |
|
Maybe when STFC renegotiated the deal with Nationwide, Nationwide wanted to be sole sponsors on both kits? I'd presume that, I'd guess it's the sort of thing that would lead to legal wrangling about the exact wording of contracts and stuff. If it ever happens, probably only likely when the deal is due to ne negotiated again. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
blinkpip
His Infernal Majesty
Offline
Posts: 6740
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Tuesday, July 25, 2006, 15:57:54 » |
|
I hate the shirts with two sponsors. Swansea Monster Munch kit looks horrid.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ee the trick is only pick on those that can't do you no harm
Like the drummer from Def Leppard's only got one arm
I annoyed Yeovilred 28/01/06
|
|
|
|
stfc_carver
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Tuesday, July 25, 2006, 16:21:01 » |
|
having two sponsors makes your kit look even tackier than it already is. look at city's last season.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SwindonStevo
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Tuesday, July 25, 2006, 16:25:30 » |
|
it we could get one that doesnt look completely shit then go for it. but if it looks crap shirt/short sales will go down so its pointless.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dazzza
Offline
Posts: 8265
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday, July 25, 2006, 16:38:09 » |
|
It was brought up at the last fans forum I think....
Mr Devlin said it was something along the lines of the club were looking into it but it wasn't a great revenue generator anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mark D
Offline
Posts: 85
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday, July 25, 2006, 17:00:05 » |
|
Nationwide have a clause in their contract giving them sole naming rights on the shirt & shorts. The only exception to this is the logo of the shirt manufacturer.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Northern Red
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday, July 25, 2006, 17:09:57 » |
|
Sock sponsors then - that'll be a money spinner for sure  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
The Grim Reaper
Offline
Posts: 1730
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday, July 25, 2006, 17:47:29 » |
|
What we need is Nationwide to build a new stadium for us instead! A bit like what Brittania did for Stjoke City. The Nationwide Stadium has a certain ring to it. Then again so does Honda Stadium.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tails
Offline
Posts: 10011
Git facked
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday, July 25, 2006, 18:44:52 » |
|
We'd look like fucking advertising boards.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday, July 25, 2006, 20:10:00 » |
|
On a different but similar theme .. how much is it to sponsor a players kit?? I wanna sponsor the Monkey!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
