Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Heywood  (Read 5774 times)
Johno

Offline Offline

Posts: 5927




Ignore
« on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 16:58:05 »

today in the western daily press has said that the players are fully commited towards playing for Andy King. so thats one for the king in brigade  Soapy Tit Wank

if you want to read it all.... buy the paper!  Wink
Logged
walrus

Offline Offline

Posts: 4228





Ignore
« Reply #1 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 17:08:13 »

Great.  Thanks for that.
Logged
Ben Wah Balls

Offline Offline

Posts: 5972




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 17:14:46 »

He said: “The performance was for the manager definitely.

“Everyone knew before the game we had to produce a performance.

“It’s not nice seeing the pressure he’s under and the stick he’s getting.

“Of course we’re behind him. He brought me here and has been brilliant for me.

“Fans say is it that the players don’t want to play for the manager?

“That’s rubbish, just rubbish.

“You couldn’t wish to have a better manager to play for. The fans might question some of the things he does but as manager for players he is different class

http://www.thisisstfc.co.uk/News_Headlines_Story.asp?NewsID=3993

Completely blows any of the "players don't want to play for him" bollocks out of the water. Even Smith was saying the same on Saturday. I hope anyone who didn't think the players were behind him has realised how wrong they were.
Logged
Boeta

Offline Offline

Posts: 3884





Ignore
« Reply #3 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 17:15:55 »

In all fairness it's results which matter not what Matt Heywood thinks
Logged
sonicyouth

Offline Offline

Posts: 22352





Ignore
« Reply #4 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 17:16:09 »

Ben, I don't think the players are going to come out and say the complete opposite.
Logged
Ben Wah Balls

Offline Offline

Posts: 5972




Ignore
« Reply #5 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 17:29:15 »

Quote from: "sonicyouth"
Ben, I don't think the players are going to come out and say the complete opposite.


No of course not and that's because they don't think the complete opposite.

No player would ever back their manager like that unless they believed in them, they'd have no reason to.
Logged
walrus

Offline Offline

Posts: 4228





Ignore
« Reply #6 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 17:30:06 »

Quote from: "Ben Wah Balls"
He said: “The performance was for the manager definitely.

“Everyone knew before the game we had to produce a performance.

“It’s not nice seeing the pressure he’s under and the stick he’s getting.

“Of course we’re behind him. He brought me here and has been brilliant for me.

“Fans say is it that the players don’t want to play for the manager?

“That’s rubbish, just rubbish.

“You couldn’t wish to have a better manager to play for. The fans might question some of the things he does but as manager for players he is different class

http://www.thisisstfc.co.uk/News_Headlines_Story.asp?NewsID=3993

Completely blows any of the "players don't want to play for him" bollocks out of the water. Even Smith was saying the same on Saturday. I hope anyone who didn't think the players were behind him has realised how wrong they were.


No it doesn't at all.  You are preventing speech as though it is fact.  The players will not want to portray a negative image of the dressing room, and may well have been instructed not to say anything against the manager.  We also know how pro-King that website is.  To assume that those statements blow any notions of unrest in the dressing room out of the water is just plain naive.
Logged
Barry Potter

« Reply #7 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 17:33:34 »

I've heard different from other players out on the lash.

The problem is that the dressing room is split, some are indeed right behind the manager like Heywood and his other favs and there's a bunch that isn't.
Logged
sonicyouth

Offline Offline

Posts: 22352





Ignore
« Reply #8 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 17:37:01 »

Quote from: "Ben Wah Balls"
No player would ever back their manager like that unless they believed in them, they'd have no reason to.


Except to get picked?
Logged
Spencer_White

« Reply #9 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 17:56:48 »

So they players are motivated to keep King in a job (who gives them a bit of an easy life, Matt Heywood - would you get away with that much boozing under a more professional manager?).

But are they motivated to get Swindon Town into big cup games and boost the clubs coffers? No they fucking are not.

KING OUT.
Logged
Ben Wah Balls

Offline Offline

Posts: 5972




Ignore
« Reply #10 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 18:04:23 »

Quote from: "Walrus"
Quote from: "Ben Wah Balls"
He said: “The performance was for the manager definitely.

“Everyone knew before the game we had to produce a performance.

“It’s not nice seeing the pressure he’s under and the stick he’s getting.

“Of course we’re behind him. He brought me here and has been brilliant for me.

“Fans say is it that the players don’t want to play for the manager?

“That’s rubbish, just rubbish.

“You couldn’t wish to have a better manager to play for. The fans might question some of the things he does but as manager for players he is different class

http://www.thisisstfc.co.uk/News_Headlines_Story.asp?NewsID=3993

Completely blows any of the "players don't want to play for him" bollocks out of the water. Even Smith was saying the same on Saturday. I hope anyone who didn't think the players were behind him has realised how wrong they were.


No it doesn't at all.  You are preventing speech as though it is fact.  The players will not want to portray a negative image of the dressing room, and may well have been instructed not to say anything against the manager.  We also know how pro-King that website is.  To assume that those statements blow any notions of unrest in the dressing room out of the water is just plain naive.

Instructed by who? If they didn't believe in the manager they would either keep quiet completely or come out and say it.

The players have said exactly the same stuff on the radio, any adver conspiracy theories are getting a bit far-fetched.
Logged
DMR

« Reply #11 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 18:31:53 »

Ben you're a bit detached from reality on King aren't you
Logged
Ben Wah Balls

Offline Offline

Posts: 5972




Ignore
« Reply #12 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 18:36:27 »

Not as much as you Dave.
Logged
DMR

« Reply #13 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 18:41:07 »

Jesus, if I was Heywood, I wouldn't be out in the papers calling King a clueless cunt, expescially as I'll probably get the chop on Saturday.
Logged
DMR

« Reply #14 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 18:42:11 »

Jesus, if I was Heywood, I wouldn't be out in the papers calling King a clueless cunt, especially as I'll probably get the chop on Saturday with Ifil coming back.

Plus Heywood is one of Kings favourties. Imagine what Andy Nicholas would say.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
Print
Jump to: