Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
 Offline
Posts: 34913
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Saturday, April 15, 2006, 18:17:36 » |
|
We have a few who are under contract or have accepted for next season.
Namely under contract Gurney, Whalley, Cureton, Brown and Peacock.
Then a few who've provisionally accepted for next season CCP Pook Shakes Ifil Smith....
Paul Smith has said he'd like to sign.
Of the rest SOH and Evans will look to leave and will find a club at L1 level.
Migs...don't know.
Some more kids will be brought through, and Evans will need a replacement...the rest of the squad next season will be made of loans.
Its possible someone may pay a 20K style fee for Cureton.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
 Online
Posts: 32291
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Saturday, April 15, 2006, 18:24:21 » |
|
get rid of curo and o'hanlon.dv85 your joking surely.
along with peacock and evans the only players of value Simply, in my opinion Curetons style of play doesnt suit the bottom two divisions, two much hoofball. Not enough passes and through balls. We might as well cash in and re-spend on someone more suited to the style down here O'Hanlon I dont rate very much to be honest.... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21289
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Saturday, April 15, 2006, 18:27:36 » |
|
you cant fire balls into curo's head with is back to goal it wont work.i think he is a decent player and we should play to his strengths.o'hanlon battled like fuck today,i rate him.
i'd be more worried about our midfield,shakes and smith were to narrow and central,shakes crossing was woefull. there were 5 in midfield it might aswell been 3
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sade
Offline
Posts: 6427
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Saturday, April 15, 2006, 18:28:58 » |
|
I think peacock will stay. Only recently signed and I think he's settled for the time being. I hope to god curo stays. I think those two could be a real asset in league two next season.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
RED ARMY
|
|
|
santini
Offline
Posts: 890
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Saturday, April 15, 2006, 20:35:40 » |
|
get rid of the high earning cunts who dont care. ... Won't be getting rid of many then  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reeves for King
Offline
Posts: 751
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Saturday, April 15, 2006, 20:42:34 » |
|
o'hanlon evans and the two forwards are the only ones i'd be bothered about losing. O'Hanlon is absolutely shite, should have sold him to Cardiff when we had the chance, he is even worse than Ifil! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
here's the man himself when you need him?
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Sunday, April 16, 2006, 11:57:05 » |
|
Spot on RFK.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21289
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Sunday, April 16, 2006, 12:29:26 » |
|
o'hanlon evans and the two forwards are the only ones i'd be bothered about losing. O'Hanlon is absolutely shite, should have sold him to Cardiff when we had the chance, he is even worse than Ifil! ifil is nowhere near as good as o'hanlon in my opinion.infact ifil is one of the worst centre backs i have ever seen in a town shirt.a fucking joke |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
walrus
Offline
Posts: 4228
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Sunday, April 16, 2006, 12:39:15 » |
|
I pretty much agree with DV.... Phil! you dont have talk some shit sometimes!  How can we possibly miss Caton? Roberts will be on his way too as there is obviously still something amiss as otherwise he would have at least been on the bench yesterday. I think people are being a touch harsh on Bulman - vs. Crawley in a preseason friendly he looked handy and is still very young. He'll also be on minimum wages. I would persevere with O'Hanlon although of late he has been awful. He's capable of being a class act though. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PHIL!!!!
Our Resident Emo Kid
Offline
Posts: 1948
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Sunday, April 16, 2006, 17:06:02 » |
|
I pretty much agree with DV.... Phil! you dont have talk some shit sometimes! How can we possibly miss Caton? Roberts will be on his way too as there is obviously still something amiss as otherwise he would have at least been on the bench yesterday. I think people are being a touch harsh on Bulman - vs. Crawley in a preseason friendly he looked handy and is still very young. He'll also be on minimum wages. I would persevere with O'Hanlon although of late he has been awful. He's capable of being a class act though. Same to you Walrus, same to you It's my opinion anyway, and i couldnt give two shits if you don't agree with it |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
santini
Offline
Posts: 890
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Sunday, April 16, 2006, 21:12:00 » |
|
I've got a great idea to get us out of this crap.
Get rid of most of them.
Struggle to find replacements.
Start the season with a bunch of low paid strangers.
Have a bad start to the season.
Get loads of loanees in.
Play the loanees instead of the regular squad.
Drop the regular squad when they then come back rusty.
Complain about their fitness when they cannot get match fit because of the loanees playing
Send the loanees back.
Get another lot of loanees in.
Keep changing the team cos they're playing like they don't know each other.
Play them out of position to accomodate the loanees.
Spiral downwards.
Repeat process ad infinitum.
Sack the manager.
That should do it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21289
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Sunday, April 16, 2006, 21:51:52 » |
|
deja vu
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
