|
STFC Village
|
 |
« on: Sunday, April 2, 2006, 18:24:30 » |
|
Think i'll watch it after WrestleMania......not expecting much though
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Sunday, April 2, 2006, 18:26:45 » |
|
i wish i cud .. bloody work !
Im not sure we will win any of the 7 matches now
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Sunday, April 2, 2006, 18:32:28 » |
|
Think i'll watch it after WrestleMania......not expecting much though Fuck that, bed straight after for me. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nomoreheroes
The Moral Majority
 Offline
Posts: 14648
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Monday, April 3, 2006, 00:54:44 » |
|
'I ain't going to Goa !'
NMH 'aka A3'
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
You're my incurable malady. I miss the pleasure of your company.
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Monday, April 3, 2006, 03:33:50 » |
|
Think i'll watch it after WrestleMania......not expecting much though good minds think alike, got it on in the background, needed to win the toss and haven't....not a good start! boeta will be happy as mahmood is playing. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
STFC Village
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Monday, April 3, 2006, 06:54:30 » |
|
We're going to lose. I'm going to bed :|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Monday, April 3, 2006, 12:40:28 » |
|
Blackwell  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Monday, April 3, 2006, 13:48:46 » |
|
3? why the hell was he in at 3?? :x
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Foggy
Offline
Posts: 1948
Ketchup wanker
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Monday, April 3, 2006, 14:20:15 » |
|
To score some runs by pinch hitting, Or to be the sight screen ,He really is crap and fat .
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sad to say, i must be on my way
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Monday, April 3, 2006, 14:30:13 » |
|
I think Blackers well and truly stuffed it up today .. along with Shah and Solanki .. not to mention another poor effort from Strauss
well done to Collingwood
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3885
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Monday, April 3, 2006, 14:38:17 » |
|
3? why the hell was he in at 3?? :x weren't you advocating him being used as a pinch hitter only last week? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Monday, April 3, 2006, 15:08:53 » |
|
yeh but 3, ffs, he should have come in at 5 or 6, not bloody 3. blackwell at 3 is just condemnig yourself to defeat. He doesn't knick singles, he is bloody slow!! he just needs to have time to knock himself in and hit the final runs, not making half the team total, its not what he does.
He did screw it up though today, but wasn't the only one.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3885
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Monday, April 3, 2006, 15:58:24 » |
|
yeh but 3, ffs, he should have come in at 5 or 6, not bloody 3. blackwell at 3 is just condemnig yourself to defeat. He doesn't knick singles, he is bloody slow!! he just needs to have time to knock himself in and hit the final runs, not making half the team total, its not what he does.
He did screw it up though today, but wasn't the only one. so would would you have moed down the order? flintoff or collingwood? blackwell has to bat opener or 3 (so he can hit over the top) or 8 or below because he is a fat slogger flat track and utterly useless attack bully |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Monday, April 3, 2006, 17:36:15 » |
|
after thinking more in depth, i think him going in 3 was sensible. I think he would be dropped if he could be, and im not surprised. I can't go no backing him much longer  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Monday, April 3, 2006, 21:06:07 » |
|
I think Blackers well and truly stuffed it up today .. along with Shah and Solanki .. not to mention another poor effort from Strauss
well done to Collingwood fuck off, blackwells been the best bowler and it wasn't his fault we didn't get the runs. none of the top order have batted well enough. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
