adje
Offline
Posts: 13945
|
|
« on: Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 11:27:21 » |
|
Evans 6-didn't have much of a chance with either goal,handling was good Gurney 2-absolute cack as usual,wherever he plays.This man is not a footballer in any sense of the word O'Hanlon 3-seems to be in a permanent state of confusion lately Smith 3-Iffy should have taken him off straight after the second goal Nicholas 3-Confidence lokks shot-couple of decent forays into the Tranmere half Pook5-We were that bad,Pook was our best midfielder-by a long way.Kept posession better than anyone else,unlucky not to score,great save by the Estonian,and actually won a few tackles. Migz 3-The most alarming deterioration of any Town player Ive ever seen.This guy has seemingly totally lost it.Shame Brown 4-intermittently dangerous-much improved in second half Peacock 3-I dont buy all this"he's the only one that tries"bollocks.He pulls out of tackles,wins a very small percentage of headers for a "big man"and,honestly,NEVER looks like scoring Cureton 6-now he DOES look hungry.lovely finish Benjamin 2-CHRIST!That must go down as one of the worst centre forward displays of all time-nowhere near the ball at any time.Reminded me of the days when we used to get players like McCammon,Shane Bradley and Kyle Lightbourne on loan.Hopeless! Shakes 5-Tend to think we'd have played a lot better if he'd started.At least we livened up when he came on.Few decent runs,won us a few corners and throws. Jarrett 1-Iffy should have left Browny on the wing and brought on Whalley imo.
|
|
|
Logged
|
quot;Molten memories splashing down upon the rooves of Swindon Town"
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 11:48:43 » |
|
Agree with most of that except Pook was gash and Evans should have kept number 2 out.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
magicroundabout
Fanta Pants
Offline
Posts: 8764
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 11:56:01 » |
|
not sure about Peacock. I thought he was chasing everything for little or no reward.
evans for the second goal was unlucky. defence let him down
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
my-velocity
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 15:31:59 » |
|
Iffy has made his first mistake as a manager, fielding a non compatible squad and getting his formation completely wrong. You all saw Tranmere had a lot of pacey players (number 11 being the one who ran all the way from his end of the pitch to the other without getting tackled and it reulting in a goal), so we should have started Shakes and Brown on the wings.
It's far to early to call for iffys head, but please oh please don't field a team like that again.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFCere
Offline
Posts: 717
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 15:37:34 » |
|
adje, great review! very funny, harshest match review ive ever seen..great stuff, were we worse than forest away? i went to that and we were truely shocking, are you telling me we were worse last night !? :shock: :shock: :shock:
|
|
|
Logged
|
ing on Sabin: "He's the new Thierry Henry"
Gazza on life in China: "I'm enjoying every day. I've tried everything: duck's head, chicken's head, chicken's feet and bats and hopefully, if I keep that up, I'll be flying."
'The first 90 minutes are the most important.' - Bobby Robson
|
|
|
stfc11
Offline
Posts: 882
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 16:54:23 » |
|
i didn't think Gurney did all that badly, better in defence than midfield
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32964
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 17:19:08 » |
|
I agree totally with you adje....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tails
Offline
Posts: 10017
Git facked
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 18:57:05 » |
|
Peacock never looks like scoring..Apart from the header he had saved early on? Hitting the bar against Forest? Peacock works his fucking arse off.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 18:58:52 » |
|
i wont do a ratings thing! dont need to really. Evans, Curo, Peacock - 6
everyone else - 0 simple as that! ok that was a ratings thing but still!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 16022
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 19:07:03 » |
|
Bit harsh Rich
Evans 6 - Made some good saves, no chance with either goal
Smith 4 - Caught out too often Gurns 3 - What planet was the guy on?! O'Hanlon 4 - Looked abit lost with no Ifil covering him, and made silly mistakes Nicholas 4 - Let his man get away too often but his throws would keep him his place for me
Migs 3 - Poor. That is all I can say Brown - 3 Not a central midfielder Pook 5 - Didn't stand out as good or bad
Benjamin 3 - Slow, the overhead kick saved him from a 2 Peacock 4 - Ran everywhere but had little to do with poor service for the majority of the game Cureton 6 - Again ran everywhere and never stopped, good goal, looked hungry
Shakes 6 - Made the difference when he came on. Was a spark and won us possession and created chances. The game was crying out for wingers and changing the formation at half-time made a huge difference. 4-4-2 all the way Iffy
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
adje
Offline
Posts: 13945
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 22:00:33 » |
|
Peacock never looks like scoring..Apart from the header he had saved early on? Hitting the bar against Forest? Peacock works his fucking arse off. That miss against Forest?You're using that as a positive?Fucking hell,my mother could have put that away
|
|
|
Logged
|
quot;Molten memories splashing down upon the rooves of Swindon Town"
|
|
|
Tails
Offline
Posts: 10017
Git facked
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 23:13:12 » |
|
Why don't we put her upfront then?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Thursday, March 9, 2006, 09:04:11 » |
|
R4E, you'd keep someone in a footy team because he has long throws?! How many goals have we scored from the aforementioned long throws? Strange...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|