Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Iffy last night.  (Read 3424 times)
reeves4england

Offline Offline

Posts: 16128


We'll never die!




Ignore
« Reply #15 on: Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 22:14:27 »

I agree that Iffy got it wrong. we need 4 in midfield no matter what. This teams plays on the wings and by leaving 3 in the centre he stopped our main attacking threat.

I'm sure he will learn and hopefully we can get the rest of the squad back into action soon
Logged
Johno

Offline Offline

Posts: 5927




Ignore
« Reply #16 on: Thursday, March 9, 2006, 07:29:12 »

i agree fred that he has had bad games recently, he has been doing nothing, but on tuesday in the 2nd half he looked to be more influential than pook did by a mile. i agree with what haysie said too. (r4e)
Logged
DMR

« Reply #17 on: Thursday, March 9, 2006, 10:35:12 »

Quote from: "simon pieman"
It's because Big Ron isn't around to tell the blacks what to do


:grin:

Close the forum, it's all downhill from here
Logged
red macca

« Reply #18 on: Thursday, March 9, 2006, 18:58:27 »

Quote from: "DV85"
Migz is being picked because we have NO OTHER CENTRAL MIDFIELDERS!!

Who else could we have put in the team instead of Migz....

Again, as said before.....he pulls are strings, when he plays well we play well....
whalley?migz at the back and gurney in midfield there was other options
Logged
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant

Offline Offline

Posts: 15863




Ignore
« Reply #19 on: Thursday, March 9, 2006, 19:11:49 »

or how about 4-4-2 with Migz and Pook in the centre? why change a formation that has served us well until he decided to change it in typical King fassion?
Logged
red macca

« Reply #20 on: Thursday, March 9, 2006, 19:34:53 »

Quote from: "Rich"
or how about 4-4-2 with Migz and Pook in the centre? why change a formation that has served us well until he decided to change it in typical King fassion?
we went 442 against rotherham and forest and got beat..thats not serving us well i do think 433 was a sign of desperation though
Logged
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant

Offline Offline

Posts: 15863




Ignore
« Reply #21 on: Thursday, March 9, 2006, 19:37:54 »

but before that? i think it was our saviour from the dull days of 4-5-1!
Logged
Johno

Offline Offline

Posts: 5927




Ignore
« Reply #22 on: Thursday, March 9, 2006, 19:59:15 »

442 was when we were palying better with shakes and brown out wide. we played better and picked up points. there was no need for a change like that
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: