|
Spud
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Wednesday, February 22, 2006, 16:02:06 » |
|
Maybe Sky have finally realsied that cricket is gay and £5 million is a total waste! Do one, you egg chasing Sweatie jock cunt. :thumbs: Dont believe most of the shit he comes out with, the other year he was talking about Cricket as if he liked it, its only because Scotland are shit at it just like they are at Football. Havent you wasted about £5million so far following that joke of a National team around the world Tartanarmy?.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Wednesday, February 22, 2006, 16:04:05 » |
|
i'll send him a postcard from germany
he could add it to his collection
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Wednesday, February 22, 2006, 16:04:59 » |
|
i'll send him a postcard from germany
he could add it to his collection  the thing is he goes on about how much he hates England but 80% of his mates are English. :roll: |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
larwood
The girl least likely to.
 Offline
Posts: 4653
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Wednesday, February 22, 2006, 16:40:41 » |
|
seems like sky box office may show it? pay 15 odd quid to watch it. thats what it seems like they may do
I'll believe it when it happens :-))( ,the reports i've heard have mentioned £150.00 for the coverage from a Indian T.V station. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I was a small, fat child in a welfare house
There was only one thing I ever dreamed about
And fate has just
Handed it to me - whoopee
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Wednesday, February 22, 2006, 16:44:38 » |
|
:evil: back to channel 4 i say. they go to court next year to see if they can make it a 'queen sport' again, meaning it has to be on either channel 1,2,3, or 4.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 15998
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Wednesday, February 22, 2006, 16:48:36 » |
|
Oh yes please! Nothing like a bit pf cricket on C4 in the summer!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
larwood
The girl least likely to.
Offline
Posts: 4653
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Wednesday, February 22, 2006, 16:54:05 » |
|
back to channel 4 i say. they go to court next year to see if they can make it a 'queen sport' again, meaning it has to be on either channel 1,2,3, or 4.
The trouble is money talks,and to be fair to Sky they have done a great job covering away tours, something which never happened before.I agree 100 per cent that the Cricket should be on terrestrial T.V,but the ECB decided to sell out to Murdoch :evil: I'm sure Sky want to show it but the lateness of the Indian board agreeing the their own T.V deal hasn't helped.But there isn't really an excuse,its only five million quid,Murdoch probably makes that amount of money every hour. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I was a small, fat child in a welfare house
There was only one thing I ever dreamed about
And fate has just
Handed it to me - whoopee
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Wednesday, February 22, 2006, 17:47:34 » |
|
I think it should be on channel 4 so everybody can watch but i do prefer the coverage on Sky!, at least they dont break for the fucking horse racing. :evil:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Wednesday, February 22, 2006, 18:44:30 » |
|
yeh, sky has its advantages, but everyone should be able to watch it in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Wednesday, February 22, 2006, 18:44:30 » |
|
yeh, sky has its advantages, but everyone should be able to watch it in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bob's Orange
Has brain escape barriers
Offline
Posts: 28688
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Wednesday, February 22, 2006, 18:55:41 » |
|
Cricket is so last year.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
we've been to Aberdeen, we hate the Hibs, they make us spew up, so make some noise,
the gorgie boys, for Hearts in Europe.
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Wednesday, February 22, 2006, 20:17:09 » |
|
Cricket is so last year. and when did you last see someone interested in the SPL?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Wednesday, February 22, 2006, 20:18:55 » |
|
on the subject i hope sky dont get it! they are cunts who charge ridiculous prices for crap sports coverage! channel 4 was much better with athers, richie and mark nicholas and the anaylst simon hughes! channel 4 should bid! its so much better!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
larwood
The girl least likely to.
Offline
Posts: 4653
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Thursday, February 23, 2006, 08:14:18 » |
|
on the subject i hope sky dont get it! they are cunts who charge ridiculous prices for crap sports coverage! channel 4 was much better with athers, richie and mark nicholas and the anaylst simon hughes! channel 4 should bid! its so much better
:-))( What no one seems to get is that before Sky came along ,Away test series were never on normal t.v.Anyway the likelyhood of a terrestrial t.v channel bidding or getting it now is nought, they aren't and never were interested. We'll find out today,this article in The Times sounds promising http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,426-2053679,00.html |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I was a small, fat child in a welfare house
There was only one thing I ever dreamed about
And fate has just
Handed it to me - whoopee
|
|
|
|
