Kinky Tom
Snow Master Sandwich King.
 Online
Posts: 9061
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Monday, September 26, 2005, 12:30:54 » |
|
oh fuck yea i forgot about seano  The part when you said Smith was on the left confused me the most. :roll: |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Monday, September 26, 2005, 12:50:05 » |
|
Lets leave our 2 wingers in the stands, we needed some balance to the team which is why they both should start.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mark Hanrahan
 Offline
Posts: 631
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Tuesday, September 27, 2005, 12:58:50 » |
|
Nah, deffo a 3-5-2 with Smith and Nicho as the wing backs. For the first time in a very, very long while I'm geniunely stumped as to what our best XI would be. I'd like to see 4-4-2 with the pacy Nicolau and Shakes given a run and Migs and Whally pulling the strings in a ball-playing midfield. That said, I'd also like to see Thorpe and Cureton given a proper run WITH Fallon in a front three. Then there's the debate at the back. Who do you choose?! With Kingy gone, the slate is clean! Although we're still a tough midfielder short. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Great save, Digby."
|
|
|
Kinky Tom
Snow Master Sandwich King.
Online
Posts: 9061
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Tuesday, September 27, 2005, 13:08:40 » |
|
Indeed Mark - with the players we have there are many, many options in terms of formations.
I think we should choose one and stick with it, for my money a straight forward 4-4-2 is the way to go, we have the wingers to go with it, and a variety of players that can be stuck in the middle.
I think King was absoultely desparate for a three of Pook, Migz and Whalley to work, but ultimately none of the three were willing to commit to getting forward enough, so it failed.
I think it's a given that Fallon's name is the first on the sheet and needs someone to play off him, at the start of the season a possible 3 of him Curo and Thorpe sounded fantastic, but we'd be ever-so narrow and would be taken to pieces.
Yep, 4-4-2 for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
le god cuervo
Offline
Posts: 1168
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Tuesday, September 27, 2005, 13:23:10 » |
|
i was just thinking, when iffy was playing here most of his success came while playing up front with ndah & with walters & gooden out wide.
does this mean we'll see a return of the big man/fast man pairing (ie. fallon & roberts), with 2 decent wingers out wide to get crosses in? maybe with roberts dropping off a bit into the "number 10" role like ndah did.
just a thought....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Kinky Tom
Snow Master Sandwich King.
Online
Posts: 9061
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Tuesday, September 27, 2005, 13:26:17 » |
|
Here's hoping lgc!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Compo
Offline
Posts: 1218
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Tuesday, September 27, 2005, 13:30:03 » |
|
Shakes was walking towards the Burger King at about 1440 on Saterday
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Kinky Tom
Snow Master Sandwich King.
Online
Posts: 9061
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Tuesday, September 27, 2005, 13:31:16 » |
|
Shakes was walking towards the Burger King at about 1440 on Saterday Perhaps Brian Howard was visiting. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
land_of_bo
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Tuesday, September 27, 2005, 13:32:28 » |
|
Or he was collecting an application form for King?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
alex
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Tuesday, September 27, 2005, 17:00:09 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Wednesday, September 28, 2005, 10:32:20 » |
|
Shakes was walking towards the Burger King at about 1440 on Saterday Well he was walking into the north stand at 1455 (ish). |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Wednesday, September 28, 2005, 12:06:39 » |
|
Shakes was walking towards the Burger King at about 1440 on Saterday Well he was walking into the north stand at 1455 (ish). with a BK bag? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
