Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Bournemouth not sustainable. No shit sherlock.  (Read 3537 times)
kerry red

« Reply #15 on: Saturday, November 24, 2012, 12:30:07 »

Yeah - and both of them look like going down.

So unless clubs do over-extend themselves financially - you aint going nowhere.

Which do you choose?
Logged
Flashheart

« Reply #16 on: Saturday, November 24, 2012, 12:48:22 »

Yeah - and both of them look like going down.

So unless clubs do over-extend themselves financially - you aint going nowhere.

Which do you choose?

They are still self sustainable though regardless of what division they are in and with their attendances it's hardly a surprise they will struggle to compete in league one. It's all relative.
Logged
kerry red

« Reply #17 on: Saturday, November 24, 2012, 12:54:14 »

Fair comment but would you, as a fan, really be arsed to continue to support a club you know were going nowhere and with no ambition to do so.

It's only when clubs, like Swindon, get an unexpected financial shot in the arm, that makes things exciting
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21289





Ignore
« Reply #18 on: Saturday, November 24, 2012, 13:19:43 »

Unless it was introduced as a must for all clubs those who stay in the black will not progress as their fans would like. For us it would guarantee losing Di Canio, increased ticket prices and depending on the youth system.
It's just not realistic for clubs with ambition
Logged
Batch
Not a Batch

Offline Offline

Posts: 55588





Ignore
« Reply #19 on: Saturday, November 24, 2012, 13:28:03 »

Yeah - and both of them look like going down.

So unless clubs do over-extend themselves financially - you aint going nowhere.

Which do you choose?

We don't choose anything. We get what we get. We'd all prefer whatever investment it takes to make us competitive.
Logged
kerry red

« Reply #20 on: Saturday, November 24, 2012, 13:35:39 »

Perhaps I should have said prefer rather than choose

But to some extent all clubs are non-sustainable.

The PL clubs are not sustainable without the Sky money, so why should lower league clubs be criticised if they are non-sustainable if not for their owners.



Logged
walrus

Offline Offline

Posts: 4228





Ignore
« Reply #21 on: Thursday, November 29, 2012, 12:29:55 »

I couldn't give a stuff about the books, I support the team not the accountant.

As long as we don't get an umbungo or face extinction, who gives a toss what it's costing some loaded lad?
Logged
Exiled Bob

Offline Offline

Posts: 1518


Likes a moan




Ignore
« Reply #22 on: Thursday, November 29, 2012, 19:29:46 »

Fair comment but would you, as a fan, really be arsed to continue to support a club you know were going nowhere and with no ambition to do so.

It's only when clubs, like Swindon, get an unexpected financial shot in the arm, that makes things exciting
I've been following Swindon since the 70s and they have been in that position on more than one occasion....and I guess many on here have as well, so, yes is the answer to your question.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: