|
|
|
Piemonte
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 13:46:47 » |
|
He might be, but unless we can swap him with fallon for example then it aint going to happen due to the fee involved.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RappersDelight
 Offline
Posts: 246
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 16:35:00 » |
|
even better, we can get rid of fallon at the same time!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Everybody's Smokin' - No one's gettin' high!
|
|
|
|
red macca
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 16:44:17 » |
|
i reckon the board would allow 50-75k to spend still
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
magnum150
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 16:47:08 » |
|
Burgess was rumored to be £250K.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 16:58:51 » |
|
i reckon the board would allow 50-75k to spend still why? they cut the wage budget by £200k. what makes you think that we've cash to spend on transfer fees? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
unclemark
Offline
Posts: 690
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 16:58:51 » |
|
Now that we are getting thorpe and cureton we will have enough strikers for a swap.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kaufman
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 17:17:13 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
unclemark
Offline
Posts: 690
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 17:27:37 » |
|
We simply don't need that many front men , but if they can play in midfield...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
le god cuervo
Offline
Posts: 1168
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 17:34:18 » |
|
i think its great we have 5 strikers! gives a lot of competition for places & puts pressure on them to score goals.
remember last season when we just had parkin & fallon to start with, fallon knew he was guaranteed to start and got lazy. the same probably would have happened this season with roberts, so this is a kick up the arse to all of them.
besides, roberts and cureton can both play out wide, and caton doesnt count yet
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
unclemark
Offline
Posts: 690
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 17:42:07 » |
|
good point , but I would rather have burgess than fallon
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
alex
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 20:56:59 » |
|
good point , but I would rather have burgess than fallon Yeh i have to agree. I think it would be nice to have 5 strikers next year, but at the moment, we don't seem to have a midfield! Although ideally i would keep burgess and fallon, i think that a central midfielder is needed far more than a striker at the moment. After sitting around on the bench for two seasons, I expect fallon wants a change anyway... would suit all parties involved. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Thursday, June 30, 2005, 21:21:04 » |
|
Id sooner have Burgess than Fallon, Rory gives it his all but i cant see him getting 10 goals in a season and thats no good im afraid.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
