fatbury
|
|
« on: Wednesday, June 7, 2006, 15:35:55 » |
|
Probably been mentioned b4 ... But how is it the 125th anniversary ... the club started in 1879 that makes it 127 next season??
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SwindonStevo
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday, June 7, 2006, 15:37:33 » |
|
going on the 1882 date
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday, June 7, 2006, 15:54:45 » |
|
going on the 1882 date ..........................
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55565
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday, June 7, 2006, 16:24:51 » |
|
going on the 1882 date ..........................
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SwindonStevo
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday, June 7, 2006, 16:50:11 » |
|
wow thats funny....i said 1882 instead of 81, but your chuffed with that post.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday, June 7, 2006, 17:00:31 » |
|
wow thats funny....i said 1882 instead of 81, but your chuffed with that post. :box:
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32408
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Wednesday, June 7, 2006, 17:01:28 » |
|
marketing scam for more money
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Wednesday, June 7, 2006, 18:09:40 » |
|
ive a pair of old offical swindon shorts with Est 1879 on them .. club needs to make up its mind :-))(
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bedford Red
Offline
Posts: 4551
Smithers Jones
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday, June 7, 2006, 18:15:14 » |
|
We've had this discussion many times before.
I guess 1879 is right.......but marketing comes in to it; we've already passed 2004.
And as we celebrated the centenary in 1981 I can why it makes sense to stick with 1881.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32408
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday, June 7, 2006, 20:34:42 » |
|
even if you just walk around our club shop you can find about 3 different est. dates!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 15999
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday, June 7, 2006, 21:30:59 » |
|
As long as they start to stick with this I don't really care. There is so much controversy over wen the club started so as long as they choose one I'm not bothered!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 11800
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Thursday, June 8, 2006, 08:48:40 » |
|
Although 79 seems the now most likely formation date, I'm with the train of thought that goes with 81 because we used that to mark the centenary. Plus we missed 125 it we did use 1879 as the start date.
So what if it brings in a few pennies, every club uses it. In fact, there were a number of fans demanding it be incorporated if I remember correctly. IN 3 years we'll have a 40 year anniversary as well no doubt.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|