Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
 Offline
Posts: 36336
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 21:05:37 » |
|
like inserting a **** into a child's ****
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3902
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 21:06:17 » |
|
its stupid really.... what a waste of talent is true, and he is just turned into some freak really and will walk free. You've just put three people's opinions into a post and pretended it's your original opinion! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
strooood
As black as Patrick from EastEnders who is officially the blackest man on the planet.
Offline
Posts: 3231
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 22:14:10 » |
|
why is it a waste of talent? Its not like he hasnt made enough good records. exactly. it'd be a waste of being an old weird looking has been. damn |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
officially blacker than the night.
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 22:58:46 » |
|
Id like to stamp on his face.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
/
W56196272
|
|
|
|
Amir
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 23:09:41 » |
|
I wonder do they have special wings for sex offenders in the US, like they do here. I'm sure they do, but then Jeffrey Dalhmer got carved up. Nothing unusual for Mikey I suppose.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mrs_spacey
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 23:19:22 » |
|
If we'll never know whether he is guilty or not - should we lock him up just in case to protect other children?
Discuss.
(personally i think he's guilty as hell but the boy's mother knew and didn't prevent it so she could sue - apparently she's a bit mental and has tried to sue lots of other people in the past)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rossi
Offline
Posts: 1604
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 23:21:37 » |
|
apparently she's a bit mental and has tried to sue lots of other people in the past) She's American. Everyone tries to sue anyone for anything out there! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3902
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 23:26:55 » |
|
If we'll never know whether he is guilty or not - should we lock him up just in case to protect other children?
Discuss. I assume this statement has been made with tongue firnly in cheek. Otherwise, it would make a complete and utter mockery of the system and tear away the last threads of decent principles in the American (or indeed any other) justice system. It'll all be case of 'Yeah he raped me, send him to prison,' 'Oh ok, if you say so.' We'd all end up living in prison so then we might as well knock down all prisons and have a big free for all (survival of the fittest and all that). |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mrs_spacey
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 23:38:37 » |
|
If we'll never know whether he is guilty or not - should we lock him up just in case to protect other children?
Discuss. I assume this statement has been made with tongue firnly in cheek. Otherwise, it would make a complete and utter mockery of the system and tear away the last threads of decent principles in the American (or indeed any other) justice system. It'll all be case of 'Yeah he raped me, send him to prison,' 'Oh ok, if you say so.' We'd all end up living in prison so then we might as well knock down all prisons and have a big free for all (survival of the fittest and all that). My statement was, in fact, based on your statement that we'll never know 'cos he'll buy the best defence money can buy.. so if that's the case and we'll never know the truth - should he be free to walk the streets / look after his own children/ other people's children - what's the most prudent solution? I don't know the answer that's why I was asking... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3902
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 23:41:38 » |
|
Unfortunately there is no solution to improve the justice system in this respect (as far as I can think). Like I said you can't just put someone in prison because someone says that they've committed a crime.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mrs_spacey
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Monday, January 31, 2005, 23:53:37 » |
|
Unfortunately there is no solution to improve the justice system in this respect (as far as I can think). Like I said you can't just put someone in prison because someone says that they've committed a crime. So he admits to sleeping with other people's children but denies touching them. Several kids' opinions vs that of a very rich adult. Who should we believe? Is sleeping with other people's children acceptable behaviour for an adult? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3902
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Tuesday, February 1, 2005, 10:48:20 » |
|
Unless you can prove that he's actually committed a crime, you can't send him to prison.
"Is sleeping with other people's children acceptable behaviour for an adult?" No, but nor is it an offence worthy of putting someone into our overflowing prisons, in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Tuesday, February 1, 2005, 11:02:32 » |
|
I wanna see him sent down. Then he'll be a real Smooth Criminal and although he'll ask the 18 stone rapist to "leave me alone" the sex starved animal will really make Wacko Scream.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
