OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 14546
|
|
« Reply #30 on: Sunday, October 24, 2010, 13:04:17 » |
|
I can see the Adver headlines on Monday ...DANNY WILSON AMAZING REVELATION. 'SIGNS GOOD PLAYER, KNOWS MORE THAN FANS' SHOCKER..
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jimbob
Offline
Posts: 1430
|
|
« Reply #31 on: Sunday, October 24, 2010, 13:53:46 » |
|
He's won me over too. I think he has to start just because of the free kick threat. I would like to see both him and Sheehan in some how.
Rose has a much better delivery than sheehan and has pace.clearly rose is a confidence player and must continue to start given his current form...stating the obvious but we wouldn't have signed sheehan had rose not had a ropey start.I imagine he told sheehan that the left back slot was his and perhaps that's why he started him rather than rose yest.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32414
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #32 on: Sunday, October 24, 2010, 14:12:58 » |
|
Wilsons like that though, he has his favourites who will come straight back in regardless of how their replacement played. David Lucas being the other.
I dont think Rose should have been dropped in the first place, before Ritchie got here I would have tried Rose & Sheehan both on the left.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Benzel
Offline
Posts: 6154
|
|
« Reply #33 on: Sunday, October 24, 2010, 15:04:57 » |
|
Michael Rose is magic...
Becoming deserving of Gurn's old song now isn't he?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Is your cat making too much noise all the time?
|
|
|
fittons_coaching_badge
Offline
Posts: 2059
|
|
« Reply #34 on: Sunday, October 24, 2010, 18:15:58 » |
|
Rose does have fantastic delivery into the box!
Could we not play with Rose and Sheehan? Sheehan at left back, Rose left midfield, go back to 4-4-2.
4-5-1 at home isnt really on in my opinion!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16355
|
|
« Reply #35 on: Sunday, October 24, 2010, 19:06:03 » |
|
Fair play to him. Can't defend for toffee but the best set piece taker i've seen in a town shirt, and whenever called upon in recent weeks hasn't let anyone down
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
LucienSanchez
Offline
Posts: 5164
Is this hospital called St. Croc of Shit?!
|
|
« Reply #36 on: Sunday, October 24, 2010, 21:47:59 » |
|
He is an awful defender... and free-kicks that are pretty good shouldn't get you a place in the starting XI when your primary abjective is to stop goals coming repeatedly from your side of the pitch.
|
|
|
Logged
|
We made a promise we swore we'd always remember... no retreat, baby, no surrender
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #37 on: Sunday, October 24, 2010, 23:08:21 » |
|
Michael Rose is magic...
Becoming deserving of Gurn's old song now isn't he?
Thought exactly the same when that beauty flew in yesterday actually.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
adje
Offline
Posts: 13702
|
|
« Reply #38 on: Monday, October 25, 2010, 10:13:12 » |
|
free-kicks that are pretty good shouldn't get you a place in the starting XI
It worked for Beckham
|
|
|
Logged
|
quot;Molten memories splashing down upon the rooves of Swindon Town"
|
|
|
jb
Offline
Posts: 800
|
|
« Reply #39 on: Monday, October 25, 2010, 11:00:37 » |
|
He is an awful defender... and free-kicks that are pretty good shouldn't get you a place in the starting XI when your primary abjective is to stop goals coming repeatedly from your side of the pitch.
He's hardly an awful defender is he. Thoroughly improved, fair play to him
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LucienSanchez
Offline
Posts: 5164
Is this hospital called St. Croc of Shit?!
|
|
« Reply #40 on: Monday, October 25, 2010, 14:22:02 » |
|
Erm, yes... yes he is. He gets turned too easily, done for pace and skill repeatedly, rarely blocks a cross, and generally has been poor. I genuinely prefer Kennedy by some distance.
|
|
|
Logged
|
We made a promise we swore we'd always remember... no retreat, baby, no surrender
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 11801
|
|
« Reply #41 on: Monday, October 25, 2010, 15:41:27 » |
|
I think his defending has improved in recent games, which wasn't hard to be honest. I think it's a big risk with Kev playing so poorly as a defender right now, which is why Sheehan had to be in. I'd be happy for Rose to start if we sort out the right back position though, and if we are playing 4-4-2. I think he'd be too exposed as things stand with Ball protecting the right back and Ritchie the left back. With Sheehan out though, he has to play, so I'd imagine the right back being tinkered with to become a bit more secure.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jimbob
Offline
Posts: 1430
|
|
« Reply #42 on: Monday, October 25, 2010, 16:11:49 » |
|
Hands up those that mist sheehan gettin a right royal roasting in the 1st half then?!seen milk turn quicker than sheehan and on current form rose deserves the shirt....disclaimer that I have the right to be fickle as the season progresses tho
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|