sonic youth
|
|
« Reply #15 on: Friday, December 1, 2006, 23:13:20 » |
|
Who will have the final say with regards to the fans representative on the board? I assume that it'll be upto individuals to nominate themselves and then the Trust members vote for their chosen nomination? Can we assume that if successful then Bill will be our new chairman?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Whits
Morphined Up
Offline
Posts: 8136
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 01:40:25 » |
|
wasnt Power all for a fans rep on the board when he was here the first time? i shall be launching my manifesto next week
|
|
|
Logged
|
Plays in midfield and his name is Tommy Miller, signed him from Huddersfield his name is Tommy Miller, first touch is average but his second is a killer, heeeeeey Tommy Miller!
|
|
|
mexico red
Offline
Posts: 11760
Demasiado no es demasiado
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 02:42:47 » |
|
i nominate me, i would be ace, we could all neck tequilas and eat tacos.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 09:14:13 » |
|
Who will have the final say with regards to the fans representative on the board? I assume that it'll be upto individuals to nominate themselves and then the Trust members vote for their chosen nomination? Can we assume that if successful then Bill will be our new chairman? The constitution of the Trust states exactly that Sonic. These are specified guidelines laid down by Supporters Direct
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 09:16:32 » |
|
I think its important that The Trust are still seen to be engaged in this and as such we should all be pushing ordinary fans to sign up, and get as involved as possible. By this I mean it should still be seen as a fan's Consortium, as opposed to a businessmans deal, that way a fans rep can justifiably be allocated a place on the Board by election. Reg.............. we are canvassing Membership again today. It is now absoloutly vital that the membership continues to grow to a level that canot be brushed aside as non-representative
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Panda Paws
Offline
Posts: 2170
Arse
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 09:46:51 » |
|
Fred, what does the current membership stand at?
I've not joined yet, but will when I get my lazy arse in gear.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 09:57:49 » |
|
663. But the way they're coming in online at the moment, it'll be 680 by lunchtime
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
Offline
Posts: 12541
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 09:58:29 » |
|
Thats easily over 10%
Well done all involved.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Panda Paws
Offline
Posts: 2170
Arse
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 10:19:07 » |
|
663. But the way they're coming in online at the moment, it'll be 680 by lunchtime Great news ..
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Frigby Daser
Offline
Posts: 3856
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Sunday, December 3, 2006, 22:47:16 » |
|
sadly the club will no doubt still claim that 90% of the fans do not back the Trust - which is bollocks, which is why everyone needs to sign up. It's important to gt to the 1000 milestone I reckon
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Monday, December 4, 2006, 01:23:46 » |
|
Meh. At the moment I think if the board issued a statement saying it was December, people would check the calendar. But you're right about 1,000 being an important milestone, although I'd still say that nearly quadrulping our membership in the space of 6 weeks or so could be legitimately argued to be an endorsement of the stance we've taken.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|