Thetownend.com

80% => Sports => Topic started by: michael on Friday, February 5, 2021, 09:42:58



Title: Cricket
Post by: michael on Friday, February 5, 2021, 09:42:58
India v England 4 match test series is on Channel 4. Plus ODIs, plus T20Is.

Day 1 is underway, England are batting.

I tell you what, those Indians do love their cricket, not only do they start playing really early in the morning, but in the middle of winter too.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, February 5, 2021, 10:31:21
Lovely getting to watch it in Channel 4, even if the last minute nature of the coverage is a bit obvious.

Joe Root is rather good at this.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Friday, February 5, 2021, 10:40:47
Been following on BBC, had no idea it was on Channel 4, that's exciting. Hearing Lou Bega's Mambo #5 at half ten in the morning was the highlight of many a summer back in the day.

England going very well at the moment, 235/2. Should be posting a 500 plus score from here, which they will if Root stays around. He's in the form of his life.



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Friday, February 5, 2021, 10:52:14
Root now on 114. Good stuff. He's class


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, February 6, 2021, 07:49:19
400/4, this is concerningly competent.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Saturday, February 6, 2021, 08:26:42
Root gets his double hundred with a six. Been watching for about two hours now and he’s not put a foot wrong. He must be knackered


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, February 6, 2021, 09:38:08
Root gets his double hundred with a six. Been watching for about two hours now and he’s not put a foot wrong. He must be knackered
I'm sure tiredness contributed to his demise.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Saturday, February 6, 2021, 10:21:52
I'm sure tiredness contributed to his demise.

9 hours at the crease in 30 degrees cannot be comfortable


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: michael on Wednesday, February 10, 2021, 12:41:26
A lovely win in the first test. I think that is 6 wins in a row in Asia?

Is there anything left unsaid about just how good Jimmy Anderson is?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: donkey on Wednesday, February 10, 2021, 13:19:32
A lovely win in the first test. I think that is 6 wins in a row in Asia?

Is there anything left unsaid about just how good Jimmy Anderson is?

Best pace bowler of all time?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, February 10, 2021, 13:25:07
Best pace bowler of all time?

It's one of those endless debates. I don't think Anderson's peak was as high as a lot of bowlers, but very few touch him for longevity and sustained excellence - maybe Courtney Walsh or Richard Hadlee.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: donkey on Wednesday, February 10, 2021, 13:27:47
It's one of those endless debates. I don't think Anderson's peak was as high as a lot of bowlers, but very few touch him for longevity and sustained excellence - maybe Courtney Walsh or Richard Hadlee.

It's a fair point, how to judge.  It's like in the NFL, the adjusted best season ever is Joe Namath, but very few would argue he's the best of all time.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, February 13, 2021, 10:16:38
Looking a bit more like I was expecting this series to go today. Not sure we've even done much wrong, India are just good at batting at home.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, February 24, 2021, 09:40:02
9am start for this day/night test. Not expecting to do too much work this week...


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Wednesday, February 24, 2021, 10:18:02
9am start for this day/night test. Not expecting to do too much work this week...

Wish this test started a couple of days later. I'm not holding out much hope of catching any Saturday morning, got a horrible feeling India have got their mojo back and might wrap this up quickly. Really hope I'm wrong


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: REDBUCK on Wednesday, February 24, 2021, 12:19:24
104-8 says you're not wrong.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, February 24, 2021, 13:19:59
112 all out.

I'm not much of a cricketist, but that's not good.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, February 24, 2021, 13:24:15
74-2, lost the last eight wickets for 38 runs. Poor.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Wednesday, February 24, 2021, 17:02:49
At least India struggled in response.....Oh! ,😖


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: river monster on Thursday, February 25, 2021, 09:58:26
Trying to make a game of it at least. India 125-8


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, February 25, 2021, 10:39:46
At least India struggled in response.....Oh! ,😖

That aged beautifully :D

Joe Root 5/8. Hilarious.

This match finishes today.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: donkey on Thursday, February 25, 2021, 10:49:23
Roooooooooooooooooooot!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Abrahammer on Thursday, February 25, 2021, 11:07:02
This first over is going well, funny as fuck


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, February 25, 2021, 11:08:37
This match finishes today.

By tea


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Thursday, February 25, 2021, 12:43:39
I haven’t caught any of the ‘highlights’ yet. I assume it’s another stinker of a pitch? Or have both teams just batted horribly? Root getting a five for suggests spinners dream of course


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Thursday, February 25, 2021, 12:45:30
75-7 suggests so!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, February 25, 2021, 12:53:28
Most of the wickets have fallen to ones that haven't turned, but plenty of balls in between have gone miles and clearly got in everyone's heads. It's very difficult to bat on, but probably not quite as impossible as the batsmen have made it look today.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Thursday, February 25, 2021, 13:56:23
The VAR guy is a bit of a homer.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RedRag on Thursday, February 25, 2021, 19:19:50
What was the Ahmedabad groundsman thinking with his first day turner?

Presumably the same as the Sheridactyl-favouring CG quagmire.  Help the home team.

This quirky pitch did abnegate the random advantage of winning the toss however.  And it didn't look so quirky to Rohit who scored 91 for once out, featuring the highest strike rate in each innings in either team.  Axar's pitch perfect bowling also stood out.

Our seam focus in this match, alongside our rotation policy don't seem to have helped.  With Root and Stokes it briefly looked like we may be able to set a target, after Roots' Fivefor,  But congratulations to India on a comfortable win.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, February 25, 2021, 19:28:22
Root was interesting afterwards, he didn't so much blame the pitch as the ball for skipping on and losing less pace off the pitch than a normal ball - it was the first time this pink ball has been used. That would explain a lot of poor timing of straight balls by good players (mostly in India shirts)


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Thursday, February 25, 2021, 20:34:35
This fred just reminds me of Reg  :(

Every time I see "new comment", I think it's going to be he telling us about a brief train ride down to Taunton. How he had the pleasure of an East European young filly sat yards away from him; to bring back to the fore memories of an earlier encounter in Tallinn and a wry chuckle to boot.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, March 6, 2021, 08:22:36
Well this has been a bit rubbish.

Root has almost four times more runs than any English batsman over the India and SL tests. Different gravy, but everyone else has been dreadful.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: ronnie21 on Saturday, March 6, 2021, 13:22:19
This fred just reminds me of Reg  :(

Every time I see "new comment", I think it's going to be he telling us about a brief train ride down to Taunton. How he had the pleasure of an East European young filly sat yards away from him; to bring back to the fore memories of an earlier encounter in Tallinn and a wry chuckle to boot.
Did we ever find out what has happened to Reg?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Saturday, March 6, 2021, 13:36:20
no


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: michael on Friday, March 12, 2021, 13:05:07
After all that test match red (/pink) ball nonsense, the REAL cricket starts today: 1st T20 international, India v England.

England won the toss and have chosen to bowl. PLAY BALL.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, March 12, 2021, 13:16:23
Should be really good to be fair. Not a test match snob, I'll watch any cricket and this 5 match series should be genuinely good - one of the issues with T20I series is that they're usually 1 or 2 game affairs, this should have some chance of momentum and narrative.

World Cup later in the year as well, in India. I reckon we have a chance, but really need Moeen or S Curran to nail down 7 and balance the team.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: michael on Friday, March 12, 2021, 13:43:22
A good start for England, Rahul out for 1 and Kohli out with a big fat lonely 0.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, March 12, 2021, 13:44:23
Bowling our two best bowlers up front is a fucking ballsy move. As is picking Sam Curran and not giving him the new ball.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: michael on Friday, March 26, 2021, 15:08:53
2nd ODI, Ben Stokes has just hit 45 runs off 10 balls, and is still going (95* from 50).


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Friday, March 26, 2021, 15:15:31
You put the mockers on that!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: michael on Friday, March 26, 2021, 15:17:42
After getting to 50 his next 12 balls went 6 6 6 1 6 4 2 6 6 2 4 W


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, March 26, 2021, 15:26:24
Playing absolute Stick Cricket there.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Friday, March 26, 2021, 16:12:03
Stokes 49 runs after reaching 50 (BBC)!

6, 6, 6, 1, 6, 4, 2, 6, 6, 2, 4, W.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Friday, March 26, 2021, 16:42:40
After getting to 50 his next 12 balls went 6 6 6 1 6 4 2 6 6 2 4 W

Stokes 49 runs after reaching 50 (BBC)!

6, 6, 6, 1, 6, 4, 2, 6, 6, 2, 4, W.

 :hmmm:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Friday, March 26, 2021, 16:47:28
weird. did not see Michaels post. Not even on ignore.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, June 2, 2021, 09:47:43
The summer starts here. What a day for it, fans at Lord's and New Zealand over here to face us. Very little to complain about there, I've even got the week off.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 23, 2021, 08:16:30
So the last two nights have seen the launch of the Hundred, with men's and women's games on the Beeb. It's very much aimed at winning over people who don't already like cricket, and judging from the general popularity of this thread the TEF certainly seems to be a hotbed for such folks (admittedly probably skewing a bit older than the target demographic).

So, anyone watched either of the games who isn't normally a cricket fan? What did you think and will you be back?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Friday, July 23, 2021, 08:21:08
Didn't watch - but I'm a cricket nut. Two of my sons are going to Edgbaston to watch the 1 August games.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Kinky Tom on Friday, July 23, 2021, 08:22:21
So the last two nights have seen the launch of the Hundred, with men's and women's games on the Beeb. It's very much aimed at winning over people who don't already like cricket, and judging from the general popularity of this thread the TEF certainly seems to be a hotbed for such folks (admittedly probably skewing a bit older than the target demographic).

So, anyone watched either of the games who isn't normally a cricket fan? What did you think and will you be back?

Not really aimed at me as I do watch cricket but I've watched most of the first 2 games and enjoyed them both. 

I very rarely watch anything other than England games unless it's a World Cup so I've already seen a few players I wasn't familiar with in last night's game.

Interesting format, hopefully it will open cricket up to a new market, was great to see so many young girls excited for the women's game on Wednesday.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Cookie on Friday, July 23, 2021, 08:55:20
I'm not a big fan of t20 anyway so the hundred isn't for me. This form of cricket excludes most of the nuance which makes cricket interesting imo. Batters have it far too easy in the short form, let's have more swinging/spinning but require more aggressive fields or something.

If the aim is to get more people interested in cricket then just remove the paywall. Nothing beats the highs and lows of test cricket but most people don't have access to it.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Kinky Tom on Friday, July 23, 2021, 09:39:26
Most people have such little time to get into cricket via the test format, this can be a gateway for those people. 

Enjoy what you see here, go to a couple of games, watch a few one days then if so inclined watch some tests. 

You don't get into cooking, for example, by starting with banquets, you feel your way into it with making a few things from scratch.

As for batters having it easy, that is up to bowlers, with their coaches and captains, to make it harder for them.  The Oval Invincibles last night kept Brathwaite (huge hitter) from scoring big really well, if this can translate to slowing run rates in tests then that can be good thing too.

I understand people who only really care for the test format but I like to see the reactions of the players that play in all formats, obviously they are well paid in shorter formats but you can't fake the emotion on display.  If they love it, why shouldn't the fans?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Friday, July 23, 2021, 09:44:48
I don’t think this, or T20, helps get people into test cricket.

Had friends at work from India, and they were of the opinion that interest in test cricket was reducing in India, as most fans just watched the IPL.

For me, I haven’t watched either game, but have friends that watched who are cricket fans that didn’t really enjoy it.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Bob's Orange on Friday, July 23, 2021, 09:45:00
When we were in Sydney we went to what was the Australian version of this. (I think) Neither the wife or I are particularly into cricket and it was more of a social event to meet an old friend I used to work with that moved to Oz a few years back.

It was fun, we drank a lot, put buckets on our heads, contributed to the people making 'snakes' out of plastic pint glasses, enjoyed the nice weather etc. Couldn't tell you what was going on the field mind you.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Penmans Penalties on Friday, July 23, 2021, 09:45:12
This format is about a good night out with cricket thrown in. I think the matches are in the big cities so us country folk won’t really give a toss who plays


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Friday, July 23, 2021, 09:47:39
This format is about a good night out with cricket thrown in.

It’s effectively a night at the darts outdoors


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 23, 2021, 09:48:28
This format is about a good night out with cricket thrown in. I think the matches are in the big cities so us country folk won’t really give a toss who plays

Thing is, it's meant to be a family thing - the T20 blast games have been very much boozy big nights out and have sold out The Oval etc. with people on the piss who aren't really paying attention for years, and that was deemed to be the problem.

Interesting so far (from a two game sample) that the women's game was very much families introducing kids to the game, and the men's game felt much more like a typical party T20. Pretty much reflects my experience attending the previous comps (KSL/T20) so not sure it's really a total shift of approach.

Being on the Beeb is good though!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, July 23, 2021, 09:59:05
It's all about getting kids and new people into cricket isn't it?

My youngest daughter is 9 and just getting into cricket, she's been through the ECB All Stars and Dynamos sessions and we're now looking at getting her into a club. Through Dynamos they were handing out the Topps cards for The Hundred and we got her some more for her birthday, she loved watching the first game on Thursday and matching the players to the cards.

From my own point of view, both matches were just like a T20 in terms of entertainment.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Abrahammer on Friday, July 23, 2021, 10:08:31
People don’t like change, 20/20 was slated when it was introduced but County cricket would have been on it last legs if it had relied on 10 people watching a County Championship game on a Tuesday afternoon

As mentioned it is a form of the game that will provide entertainment to new audiences


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nick Bamosomi on Friday, July 23, 2021, 10:29:54
I watch cricket whenever I can, so watched some of each Hundred match. I don't tend to watch women's cricket so it was quite good for me to watch a few of them play.
I think it is trying to attract newbies to watching cricket, as last night they were demonstrating Yorkers, and it was good to see the younger kids watching - let's face it, a Test Match isn't really the place to take a youngster unless they're already cricket fans.
I wonder what Reg would have thought of it.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JBZ on Friday, July 23, 2021, 12:45:52
I have been a member at Somerset for a number of years now. I have taken my offspring to all other formats of the game but they have shown little interest.  However, 2 of them are keen players.

I will probably sound a like a twazzock but i don't really see the point of the hundred.  You can probably promote cricket to young uns in the context of the current formats


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Bennett on Friday, July 23, 2021, 12:58:09
The hundred's just a rebadge of T20 (give or take a few overs). I don't see the point in it but then I already enjoy watching cricket.
If it helps get more people into the game then it's done its job


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Kinky Tom on Friday, July 23, 2021, 13:03:58
Also, I'm isolating as I'm over from France for a bit.  Nothing else is interesting me on TV at the time the games are on, or at all frankly, so live sport is very welcome.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JBZ on Friday, July 23, 2021, 13:10:43
I would have like to have seen some bold rule changes - for example, extra runs for the distance of each boundary or hitting particular targets/zones or having to take off a fielder at certain intervals.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Friday, July 23, 2021, 13:10:47
I think that Reg described it as an abomination.
That's good enough for me.

T20 is plenty good enough.

Franchising is ok in cricket it would seem.
Still, all well & good if it encourages youngsters to take an interest in the satisfying thwack of leather on willow.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Munichred on Monday, July 26, 2021, 20:41:00
I've enjoyed watching quite a bit of cricket this summer. Just seen a very entertaining win for Trent Rockets in The Hundred. Great to see the enthusiasm shown by fans of all ages, but especially by families and the young kids who are the future of the game.
I enjoy watching the Indian Women's team too, some really good batters in that team.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Leggett on Monday, July 26, 2021, 20:50:26
I'm an extremely fair weather cricket watcher, watched quite a bit in the summer of 2000 whilst avoiding my GCSE revision, and have been to precisely one live cricket match with my cricket mad brother in law (who's dad was the vicar at a church that overlooks Edgebaston, he used to watch games from the roof when he was a nipper), which was a one day game between Gloucestershire and maybe Sri Lanka, again early 00s... can't remember. Dragged back into awareness of the sport by the Tailenders, ep1 OG ;)

Thoroughly enjoying the Hundred though. Trying to get my nippers to watch but neither really care, ha!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Monday, August 16, 2021, 16:17:39
Fucking useless


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Boy About Town on Monday, August 16, 2021, 17:34:05
What a shambles


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: AMayesIng on Tuesday, August 17, 2021, 07:39:16
https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/england-vs-india-1st-test-trent-bridge-its-not-the-coach-captain-or-players-at-fault-its-the-whole-rotten-system-1272148

Sums it up for me. Understand the rationale behind 20/20, but the way it, and the 100, have been scheduled, is not good for the game imho.

The 100 itself is totally un-neccessary; they could have tweaked the 20/20 (e.g. to add Womens teams) and been fine. As for the 8 new 'city franchises'; imagine 'West Country Cunts' or something in a new footy comp, based at Ashton Gate and taking players from us, Pox, Gash and Slave traders. The goals are twice as wide, 9 players, rush goalies and games last 60 minutes with 8 subs. Typical score: 11-8. First winners: MK Super Dons. Happy? Thought not.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Monday, September 6, 2021, 13:15:43
Every. Fucking. Time.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, September 6, 2021, 14:35:45
Jasprit Bumrah is quite good isn't he?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Monday, September 6, 2021, 15:34:23
Typical English sport, play not to lose and end up losing. Should have heaped pressure on India from the get go- the way we played today was only going to end up with an India win or draw.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JBZ on Saturday, September 18, 2021, 12:52:22
Extraordinary win by Somerset


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, September 18, 2021, 13:04:48
A deeply silly game. Both teams did their absolute best to lose that one, but good to see Somerset make the final.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JBZ on Saturday, September 18, 2021, 19:09:43
Poor start for Somerset


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JBZ on Saturday, September 18, 2021, 20:23:04
Gutted


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, September 18, 2021, 20:27:56
https://twitter.com/VitalityBlast/status/1439322672391876611

Quite good that. Don't get that on a Sunday in the village leagues.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 14:51:14
Ashes starts tonight down under. Anyone putting their sleeping schedule in the bin to watch it rain in Brisbane?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Mr Stevens on Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 15:59:49
Home from work at 12.00 so will watch the first session and have the radio commentary on overnight.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 16:11:10
Should be back home in time to watch a bit of the first session with 3 points in the bag.  :)
BT Sport though?
Not sure how Fletch, Jenas, Rio et al will handle the commentary.
Badly probably.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 16:17:01
I actually quite like the look of their team - no Atherton and no Hussain obviously as they're contracted to Sky, which is a real shame but a lot of quite interesting people involved in the BT coverage rather than just the usual loudmouths - Butcher, Trott, Moeen Ali and Harmison are on the group. Might be a bit awkward with them not being there, but willing to give it a go.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: horlock07 on Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 16:22:56
Oh is it on BT sport, not watched any tests for years but if its there might dip in.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 16:24:58
The looks like a good lineup.
I know that Butcher will be very good & the rest will know what they are talking about.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 20:17:01
Fuck yeah, just noticed it’s on BT Sports, get in LL.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 00:10:13
Going to be a long night and day at The Gabba.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 00:21:40
I thought Town were shite tonight, but I get home and England are even worse 😢


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 04:56:01
This England team must score less than 200 more regularly than any other one in my lifetime, surely even the 90's one scratched 200 together more frequently.  Other than Root when in the mood and form, nobody ever looks in control when batting.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 06:21:37
At least we have a good bowling attack to get us out of trouble........Oh!  :doh:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 07:43:24
There's something vaguely comforting about waking up to a calamitous performance in Aus. The world may change, but you can rely on some things.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 08:41:52
There's something vaguely comforting about waking up to a calamitous performance in Aus. The world may change, but you can rely on some things.

It makes me feel quite nostalgic. For most of my 20's we lost every ashes series and, particularly in Australia, there was no realistic expectation that we'd do anything but lose.

Rob's right though, even in those days the innings average was high 200s and sub 200 scores tended to be limited to second innings when the Aussies had piled on 500 plus and the situation was hopeless.




Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 08:45:37
I don't think Aus will pile on 500 plus mind, both sides are better bowling than batting at the moment. The net result might well be the same, but I think our bowlers will be okay.

And yes, I do expect this to be quoted tomorrow when Labuschagne and Warner are on 200* each.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:48:29
When did we last win at the Gabba? 30 years or more ago?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 12:34:28
It's rare for anyone other than the Aussies to win at the Gabba.  It's perfectly suited to their bowlers and batsmen. However, waving the white flag in the first hour of the Ashes probably sets a tone you don't want to be setting.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Friday, December 10, 2021, 07:58:20
Well that was a bit better.
Could do with Root making a double century, to even have half a chance. Just hope we don’t collapse again tomorrow after a good day.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Friday, December 10, 2021, 08:33:49
Well that was a bit better.
Could do with Root making a double century, to even have half a chance. Just hope we don’t collapse again tomorrow after a good day.
And Malan too!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Friday, December 10, 2021, 08:58:41
Absolutely superb fight back by Malany and Rooty. Big hundreds from both and a cameo by the likes of Stokesy and Buttlery and we actually have a sniff of winning. Especially if the pitch throws up a demon or two


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, December 10, 2021, 09:02:24
Great fightback, bodes well for the rest of the series but we're still a long way behind in this game.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Saturday, December 11, 2021, 01:52:59
Absolutely superb fight back by Malany and Rooty. Big hundreds from both and a cameo by the likes of Stokesy and Buttlery and we actually have a sniff of winning. Especially if the pitch throws up a demon or two

Whoops


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, December 11, 2021, 07:39:50
To quote Blackadder, rather a spectacular return to form after the genius moment.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Saturday, December 11, 2021, 08:52:53
Whoops

Whoopsy


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Saturday, December 11, 2021, 08:56:37
avoided an innings defeat, something to build on 😁


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Saturday, December 11, 2021, 09:07:28
Whoops

I did admire the optimism when you posted that.  :)

Strange decision to bat first and to leave out the 2 expert bowlers in those conditions.
Saving them for the day nighters I guess, but don't really understand the need for rotation in cricket.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Saturday, December 11, 2021, 09:20:01
I called it time when we were 8 down last night. The nod order collapse was refreshingly consistent with recent ashes series it would seem.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, December 11, 2021, 09:48:25
I wouldn't mind but the Ozzies hardly have the calibre of McGrath, Warne, Gillespie, Lee, Ponting & the Waugh brothers etc.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: AMayesIng on Saturday, December 11, 2021, 10:18:28
I did admire the optimism when you posted that.  :)

Strange decision to bat first and to leave out the 2 expert bowlers in those conditions.
Saving them for the day nighters I guess, but don't really understand the need for rotation in cricket.

Jimmy is 39, fast bowling is quite hard on the body, especially if the opposition bat for a good chunk of 5 days. Having said that, rotating both of then out in the same game, then finding a bowler friendly Day 1 pitch and choosing to bat, does seem a little poorly thought through.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Saturday, December 11, 2021, 10:31:38
Jimmy is 39, fast bowling is quite hard on the body, especially if the opposition bat for a good chunk of 5 days. Having said that, rotating both of then out in the same game, then finding a bowler friendly Day 1 pitch and choosing to bat, does seem a little poorly thought through.

Yeah, he's looked after himself though.
Selection for the squad should mean fit to play if called upon.*
Uphill struggle now.

*Doesn't seem to apply in football where broken feet & shoulders about to fall off haven't been a barrier to England selection for major tournaments.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Saturday, December 11, 2021, 13:24:56
Let's be honest over the past three years or more, that was not a collapse in either innings, just how we bat.   The difference between forms of the game cannot be coincidence.  Root is the only player who looks like a Test batsman.  The rest all average below 40 by a distance and never look set.  Stokes can be a great player but not an anchor and at some point we have to identify we can't pick him as a bowler, not one you want to rely on.  It's hard to knock individuals because they really don't have much more in them.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, December 14, 2021, 13:40:55
Day night test the next one, so starts about 3:30 AM and goes from there, so a decent chance of seeing the final session of each day at least.

I see that the mood music suggests an England selectorial classic: bat shite, field shite, bowl pretty well considering, drop three bowlers for the next test.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, December 16, 2021, 11:27:34
Well, the good news is the day/night game meant I was able to watch two whole sessions today.

The bad news is that those two sessions included one wicket.

Poor Jos Buttler has managed to pull off one of the best catches I've seen and one of the worst drops I've seen in one day. Sadly the blinder was off Harris, who is useless, and the drop was off Labuschagne, who really isn't, and was his second drop.

It's all feeling a bit 5-0 this.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Thursday, December 16, 2021, 22:24:50
Game over already.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Thursday, December 16, 2021, 23:29:29
When Root said in an interview that unlike previous tours we could take some positives out of the first test I thought we were in trouble.

Couldn’t see many positives in a 9 wicket trashing, surely they should be thinking about what we could do better.

Only question is whether it will be 4-0 or 5-0


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Friday, December 17, 2021, 08:44:31
Hameed catches Carey and England don’t celebrate. Says it all


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, December 17, 2021, 09:27:35
And now one of these incredibly annoying lower order biffing partnerships that we used to be great at.

And another drop. Our fielding has been horrible.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Friday, December 17, 2021, 10:20:15
God we are shit.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Boy About Town on Friday, December 17, 2021, 10:22:16
Dire. Wouldn't be surprised if Root goes cheap as well. Series drubbing incoming.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, December 17, 2021, 10:32:39
Saved by the storm.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Friday, December 17, 2021, 10:38:15
Burns needs to be dropped (which is ironic as it's all he seems able to do on the field). He offers nothing. Not the rest are much use either. Utterly useless.

EDIT: Probably not fair of me to single out any one player. They are a really poor test team across the board and it's no surprise that one or two individuals always seem to be scape goats, so I should probably take that back. The whole setup needs a rethink as we are going to be crushed 5-0.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Boy About Town on Friday, December 17, 2021, 10:41:46
Burns needs to be dropped (which is ironic as it's all he seems able to do on the field). He offers nothing. Not the rest are much use either. Utterly useless

Bring back Strauss and Cook. Could play better than them two opening divs.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, December 17, 2021, 10:42:42
You can only drop him if there's someone to replace him with though, and there really isn't. Literally on this tour, as they sent all the Lions team home so the only other batsmen on the tour are Crawley, Bairstow and Lawrence.

The main worry for me with Burns is that he's playing at these balls at all. They're bouncing over a second set of stumps and he's trying to play them - all the Aussies leave on length and it's so important to do that.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Friday, December 17, 2021, 10:47:49
You can only drop him if there's someone to replace him with though, and there really isn't. Literally on this tour, as they sent all the Lions team home so the only other batsmen on the tour are Crawley, Bairstow and Lawrence.

The main worry for me with Burns is that he's playing at these balls at all. They're bouncing over a second set of stumps and he's trying to play them - all the Aussies leave on length and it's so important to do that.

I don't know much about Crawley and Lawrence, would you be as worried about either of them opening as you must be about Burns? I'll defer to your more informed opinion.

Would Bairstow be worth a go? Could he be any worse?

I'm so disillusioned by this team, its really depressing


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, December 17, 2021, 11:13:13
Crawley had a long run in the side pretty recently as an opener/3, scored that one monster 270-odd against Pakistan but otherwise not much good. I have a mild hunch he might do okay on Aussie pitches, but no real evidence for that.

Bairstow and Lawrence are both lower order players. Could send them in to open, but it'd be a heck of a risk.

To a point, opening in Australia and opening in the UK is super different technically - in the UK you need to be wary of swing so play at the ball a lot to avoid it bowling you as you leave , in Aus there's less swing and more bounce so you want to play less to avoid it taking the edge as you play. This is part of why Warner was absolute shit in England last time out and is imperious in Aus.

Not sure what the answer is in any way really. Cricket has become so different in different locations now that competing abroad is stupidly hard against anything like a competent side.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Friday, December 17, 2021, 11:29:05
Crawley had a long run in the side pretty recently as an opener/3, scored that one monster 270-odd against Pakistan but otherwise not much good. I have a mild hunch he might do okay on Aussie pitches, but no real evidence for that.

Bairstow and Lawrence are both lower order players. Could send them in to open, but it'd be a heck of a risk.

To a point, opening in Australia and opening in the UK is super different technically - in the UK you need to be wary of swing so play at the ball a lot to avoid it bowling you as you leave , in Aus there's less swing and more bounce so you want to play less to avoid it taking the edge as you play. This is part of why Warner was absolute shit in England last time out and is imperious in Aus.

Not sure what the answer is in any way really. Cricket has become so different in different locations now that competing abroad is stupidly hard against anything like a competent side.

Cheers for that Nemo, really insightful. Am I right in saying Bairstow has opened before, but without much success?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, December 17, 2021, 11:35:25
Not on a long term basis in red ball cricket, he does it all the time in white ball cricket but it's basically a different sport. I think we have chucked him in once or twice in a "Tom Broadbent up front" type hail mary though, which may be your memory.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Friday, December 17, 2021, 11:59:24
It’s not just this team though is it, how long is it since we have won a test in Australia?





Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Friday, December 17, 2021, 13:11:41
Central Contracts were once a game change for out Test team - enabling the cream of our talent to be coached, looked after and focused on improving their game without having to divert that attention away (yes, they still played County Cricket, but it made England like a top tier club).

Since then what has changed for us to become so utterly feeble?  The rise and change of the sorter forms of the game.  Playing a few 20 over games in India is far more of a career choice than getting an England Central Contract and playing any of the shorter forms a better choice for a player than adding a few County 4 day games to get some time in the middle.  The One Day game of yore used to be just a faster version of Test cricket, but with the focus has now become a different sport with completely different techniques being developed by players.

That has impacted other Countries as well, it's not just us.  Even this Aus team would take a serious beating from those that came before it.  I think, to the points made above, the technique issue is now showing up the variation in where you play as well.

Overall, nobody is really knocking on the door to replace this lot, which means we have a few years of abject batting to come.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: swindon74 on Friday, December 17, 2021, 13:47:39
The selection has been so odd, why are we putting leach in the team if we aren’t going to even bowl him! Should have picked wood, he would have caused all sorts of issues with his bounce and pace. And then just have root as our main spin bowler.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Friday, December 17, 2021, 14:14:14
The selection has been so odd, why are we putting leach in the team if we aren’t going to even bowl him! Should have picked wood, he would have caused all sorts of issues with his bounce and pace. And then just have root as our main spin bowler.

Agree about Root being our main spin bowler. He might be technically as good but he seems to get wickets and batsmen might be more wary of him precisely because he isn’t as technically good as Leach. Fear of the (relatively) unknown and all that


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Friday, December 17, 2021, 15:26:00
Problem is that we have an ageing bowling attack and a technically flawed batting line up.

We have made village cricketers like Labuschene and Smith look like world beaters.

Burns is technically flawed. Hameed played one or two good innings before breaking his arm several years ago and has done little since. Quite how he has made it into the England side with a 1st Class average of 32 I'll never know!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, December 17, 2021, 16:18:51
We have made village cricketers like Labuschene and Smith look like world beaters.

They are world beaters, they have respectively the 2nd and 4th highest averages in the entirely history of test cricket.

Might be a bit lower if we could catch mind.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Saturday, December 18, 2021, 06:30:15
I’m going to be quiet this time


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Saturday, December 18, 2021, 06:46:32
I’m going to be quiet this time

I was just thinking this is going rather well. Root, what were you thinking?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, December 18, 2021, 08:10:32
Not quiet enough Hunk, seemingly.

I know it's not the only thing but Aus just don't drop catches. It makes so much difference that they have to take ten wickets and we have to take 15 or more.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, December 18, 2021, 08:54:26
There's noone to bring in! Burns, Hameed and Pope have to go.

All England have to bring in are Crawley and Bairstow.

But the fact Woakes has been ineffective suggests Wood will come back (if fit). The net effect of those 3 changes would be to weaken the batting line up.

Looked at the Lions squad and don't see any names I would bring in! Livingstone could potentially come in as a lower order option, but, is he better than Bairstow or Buttler (who for me are both number 6 or 7s in a decent team)?

The Vicar of Sibley is another failed opener who turned down the Lions tour.

Bracey showed he was waaaaaay off Test level.

I might as well get my pads out of the loft if we are looking further down the list!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, December 18, 2021, 11:03:13
Woakes has been ineffective with the ball but has also been our fourth highest scoring batsman.

We've played Leach in the wrong test, it's spinning pretty significantly here. Swap the bowling attacks for the two tests and we'd have done better in both I'd have thought...

Of course, we could bowl for brain-dead runouts.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, December 19, 2021, 08:01:54
Here we go by again. Woke up to Malan bowling, walked the dog and back just to see him take guard.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Sunday, December 19, 2021, 10:28:25
Here we go by again. Woke up to Malan bowling, walked the dog and back just to see him take guard.

Well it is up to Stokes and Root to lead by example and lead the fight back.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Boy About Town on Sunday, December 19, 2021, 14:03:23
Joe Root was dismissed with the final ball.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Sunday, December 19, 2021, 14:45:20
This is as nailed on a 5-0 drubbing as the Aussies could ever dream


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, December 20, 2021, 07:28:49
Chris Woakes now has more runs in the series than five of England's top seven, and will almost certainly be dropped for the next test.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Monday, December 20, 2021, 08:21:06
This does feel very 1990's when England couldn't buy an Ashes win, doesn't it?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Monday, December 20, 2021, 08:49:18
Quote from: Samdy Gray
This does feel very 1990's when England couldn't buy an Ashes win, doesn't it?

Rory Bremner is warming up his Paul Hardcastle parody remix as we speak....

https://youtu.be/G3bl4xaFZMM


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, December 20, 2021, 08:54:21
Well, we made it to tea. Buttler being able to bat like this, and like he does in the white ball stuff is quite remarkable.


Title: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Monday, December 20, 2021, 09:15:26
bye bye butler.

silly out in the end


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Monday, December 20, 2021, 09:39:03
Utter rubbish. Now all that will happen is that Bairstow, Crawley and Wood (if fit) will come in for Hameed, Pope and Woakes.

If its a turner, then maybe Lawrence comes in as another swisher and part time bowler - Leach doesn't seem to be the answer and Root has just mauled his own bowling attack. Not sure who bowled shortest for England as I have only seen the 'lowlights'.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, December 20, 2021, 11:03:32
There's certainly not a great deal to come in. I do think we could do better with selection, but we probably still lose.

Personally I think Leach is good enough (not Swann, but up to the level of a Panesar or a Tufnell) but getting spooked by him getting hit a bit on a flat deck by set batsmen shows the lack of faith of Root. I do wonder if he just doesn't rate any spin as he's so good at playing it himself - Mark Waugh is more or less the same on commentary.

That said, if we don't trust finger spinners in Aus, fair enough - then why pick two of them? Debut Parkinson or pick Crane in the summer and then take them on the tour. They just seem to have gone worst of both worlds.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: fittons_coaching_badge on Monday, December 20, 2021, 15:53:40
There's a test tour of the WI in March and for that expect a total clean sweep.

Saqib Mahmood is playing BBL and took 4 for nothing the other day but it would be in his interests to wait until the WI tour rather than called up for 5th test when this side are buggered.

Crane or Parkinson as a leggie.  I like Yates as Warwickshire as an opening option but expect England to fluff around with Zak Crawley.

Expect Foakes to get a go in WI.

If Pope doesn't up his game then maybe time for a Abell or Livingstone or Harry Brook.

Tough as it would be England may have to make a call on Jimmy/Broad. I maybe only expect 1 to go to WI?  I think taking both would be detrimental to the future as such you have a choice to make next summer.  They cant both be allowed farewell tours.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Monday, December 20, 2021, 16:00:35
I think Anderson and Broad are way past their sellby unfortunately. Woakes with Woods pace would be awesome. He's too slow to threaten though.

Time to let them go and build for the future.



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Sunday, December 26, 2021, 01:43:04
13-2  :suicide:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pookemon on Sunday, December 26, 2021, 06:32:56
I think Anderson and Broad are way past their sellby unfortunately. Woakes with Woods pace would be awesome. He's too slow to threaten though.

Time to let them go and build for the future.


Can't see how the bowlers are to blame.   Without runs on the board you're on the backfoot and defensive.

Hammeed only averages 32 in first class cricket, and Crawley 31.   I don't understand why they are anywhere near the England team.
Not all their fault of course, the middle order all gave their wickets away today.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, December 26, 2021, 08:38:38
Watched until 1am, when we were 2 down. Crawley 'slightly' unlucky to get a snorter when he was starting to look OK. Dropped the wrong opener imho. Hameed is a walking wicket and nowhere near the standard of a Test opener. Burns has a flawed technique which, is inconsistent and is bang out of form.

Different game when Root was batting. Made it look relatively easy at times. Malan was a little too crab like for me, which invited pressure. However, if you are going to play like that you have to stay there for multiple sessions. To get out before lunch in such a lame way was poor - As was Root, who seems to get punished for every loose shot.

The rest just aren't good enough as test batsmen. They are 'all rounders' meaning that they are neither one thing or another and in a good side, would all be fighting for number 6 or 7 slots.



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Leggett on Sunday, December 26, 2021, 08:49:58
Not gonna lie, quite happy I don't have BT Sports...


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Sunday, December 26, 2021, 10:25:33
Not gonna lie, quite happy I don't have BT Sports...

An Ashes test down under is on my bucket list of semi or full retirement things to do. Not sure I’d want to actually sit in any of the stadiums being unmercifully ridiculed by the convicts. This has 5-0 written all over it and the limited overs games don’t look to promising either.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, December 26, 2021, 11:37:16
Limited overs will be fine, we're good at that.

The tests will not.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Sunday, December 26, 2021, 12:50:16
Limited overs will be fine, we're good at that.

The tests will not.

I know that but I’m still not confidant we’ll make a decent fist of it. We’ll see.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, December 26, 2021, 22:27:40
Covid to prevent a whitewash?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Sunday, December 26, 2021, 22:53:47
Nope. Not yet anyway. Second day can go ahead. Bring on the pain


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, December 26, 2021, 23:01:22
Hope short lived yet again!

Not even Covid can stand firm against the Aussies!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Sunday, December 26, 2021, 23:34:43
Prediction: 2 early wickets to get hopes up then Aus finish day 370/7


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Monday, December 27, 2021, 00:27:26
Prediction: 2 early wickets to get hopes up then Aus finish day 370/7

Part 1. Tick.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Monday, December 27, 2021, 00:54:32
Ball starts to swing for Anderson just before drinks

Time for bed


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Monday, December 27, 2021, 02:36:27
Twitter as quoted by the BBC:

‘Jack Leach averages 61 against left-handers. Makes sense you wait until there are two of them at the crease to bring him on after what happened at the Gabba.’

Assuming as I must that the veracity of the quote is accurate, you really do have to question Root’s captaincy here. Possibly our greatest ever batsman. But a good captain? I have to doubt it. I fear this pressure we have put on them is going to go to waste, would love to eat humble pie…but let’s be honest, I probably don’t have to


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Monday, December 27, 2021, 03:00:13
When it comes to cricket I’m half way between a layman and an armchair fan, so I’m perfectly happy for it to be pointed out that I’m missing something by someone more itk. But fuck me is this not obvious that Root is having a captaincy nightmare? He’s murdered all the momentum we created by putting Leach on, surely? This appears to me to be shocking captaincy. I’d suggest it might be time for him to concentrate on batting but who would replace him as captain? Stokes would probably be the only option from this lot, or maybe Bairstow? Past that I’m lost


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, December 27, 2021, 08:01:56
England captains traditionally resign when their batting drops off or when they've fallen out with everyone. Actual tactical acumen is considered optional, which is really odd when you consider how much Brearley is deified.

I think Root will probably go after this series, but you're quite right about the lack of alternatives. Burns would have been the other guy, long term county captain, but they've just dropped him.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Monday, December 27, 2021, 08:57:14
Well that went well!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Monday, December 27, 2021, 08:58:34
it certainly went quickly


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Monday, December 27, 2021, 16:12:33
England captains traditionally resign when their batting drops off or when they've fallen out with everyone. Actual tactical acumen is considered optional, which is really odd when you consider how much Brearley is deified.

I think Root will probably go after this series, but you're quite right about the lack of alternatives. Burns would have been the other guy, long term county captain, but they've just dropped him.

I’m very bored and so have crunched some numbers. The following is the batting average of our last few long term captains in their final ten tests as captain, their career batting averages and the results of those last ten tests:

Joe Root (not including the current test)-90.7 (😲)/50 LLLWLDLDLL

Alastair Cook-51.6/45.4 WWLWWWLDLL

Andrew Strauss-67.2/40.9 LDLDWWWLLL

Michael Vaughan-38.8/41.4 LLDWWDWLD

Nasser Hussain-61.6/37.2 WDWWWLWWWL

Michael Atherton-44.8/37.7 LWLLLLWWWL

Interestingly all those listed above, with the exception of Vaughan, batted above their career averages in their final ten tests. The other glaring fact is that Root is batting at a phenomenal average and yet this has seemingly no effect on the performance of the team. He has to drop the captaincy and give somebody else a go.



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Monday, December 27, 2021, 20:12:31
I’m very bored and so have crunched some numbers. The following is the batting average of our last few long term captains in their final ten tests as captain, their career batting averages and the results of those last ten tests:

Joe Root (not including the current test)-90.7 (😲)/50 LLLWLDLDLL

Alastair Cook-51.6/45.4 WWLWWWLDLL

Andrew Strauss-67.2/40.9 LDLDWWWLLL

Michael Vaughan-38.8/41.4 LLDWWDWLD

Nasser Hussain-61.6/37.2 WDWWWLWWWL

Michael Atherton-44.8/37.7 LWLLLLWWWL

Interestingly all those listed above, with the exception of Vaughan, batted above their career averages in their final ten tests. The other glaring fact is that Root is batting at a phenomenal average and yet this has seemingly no effect on the performance of the team. He has to drop the captaincy and give somebody else a go.


The problem is that we don't have any players good enough for test cricket let alone test captaincy!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Monday, December 27, 2021, 20:16:39
The problem is that we don't have any players good enough for test cricket let alone test captaincy!


It really is a shambles. I’ve no idea who’s to blame but it seems certain that we’ll continue to be poor for a very, very long time


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Robinz on Monday, December 27, 2021, 22:58:47
English cricket has always seemed to have suffered from a class structure issue. If you played the game with a certain upper lip / higher class attitude you would be OK with selection and the governing body
This type of"don't rock the boat" we will support you  Woke attitude does not work in Australia especially where sport is involved.
Sport has winners and losers..Australia, and especially when playing in Australia are winners. England as shown are generally losers.
Real shame when Stokes Woods and Root  must not forget Jimmy Anderson were really showing total commitment.
Yesterday sitting in a pub in Auckland watching the Aussie tail wagging thinking this can't get worse
But wait it did 30 odd for 4
Fuck I hate the Ashes series.
COYMRs


 





Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Monday, December 27, 2021, 23:28:02
Fuck I hate the Ashes series.

Only when they are in Australia, over here they are brilliant because either team can win


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Robinz on Monday, December 27, 2021, 23:42:59
Possibly you are right Posh.
Living in New Zealand, New Zealanders have a saying they support NZ and any team playing Australia
Great saying especially in the early 2000's when Jonny Wilkinson won the World cup in Australia for England.
COYMRs


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 00:14:50
Terrible decision by the umpire against Bairstow

Should have been given not out with the Aussies needing to review.

Mind you, silly sod should have hit it. Get the bat coming down straight and you have more chance.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 00:24:00
Abysmal shot by Root. No foot movement.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 00:30:37
Wood. Well done fella! One more duck to tie the record in a year!

32 year old debutant with a 5 for!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 00:33:14
Robinson equals the record for England!

Boland has bowled 21 balls and got 6 wickets!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 00:41:01
Joked with my son it would be finished by 1am - We only managed 12:50am!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 01:56:04
Utterly embarrassing. They should be ashamed of themselves


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Robinz on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 04:46:40
What a load of crap England are
No pride or skill just over paid and over here.
No bottle and bet Ray Illingworth would be totally embarrassed should he be watching down right now
COYMRs


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 07:54:04
Went to bed at midnight or so thinking we'd take it to tea at least. What the fuck.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 10:08:36
After Stokes went early I jokingly asked whether Australia would need to bat again?

Was only mildly surprised when I looked this morning to see that they didn’t.

Take England away from conditions that suit them and put them up against any decent opponents and they will let themselves down.

To get an idea of how bad England have been in recent times in Australia, Joe Root has never been in a team that has won a test match in Australia?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RedRag on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 10:42:58
A number of old fogeys blaming the one day game for our batting ills.

Don't the likes of NZ, Aus and India also play it?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 11:15:21
A number of old fogeys blaming the one day game for our batting ills.

Don't the likes of NZ, Aus and India also play it?
I think us old fogey's are blaming the 'de-prioritisation' of the longer version of the game on England's lack of ability to bat long.

We have very few batsmen who seem to have the ability to bat for a whole session, a whole day or score a big hundred.

The assertion is being made that its possibly because there is so much focus now on the shorter form of the game and scoring runs quick rather than having players who can bat long.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 11:20:17
There's a lot of people lashing out at the moment, as you'd expect in the immediate aftermath. The difficult truth is that it's probably a lot of contributing factors, and people exaggerate/ignore them depending on their own personal beliefs (so basically politics all over again).

Is red ball cricket a bit of an afterthought at county level? Absolutely
Is the amount of talent we have spread too thinly across teams? Absolutely
Does the scheduling mean that we don't encourage fast bowling or spin? Sure
Was the scheduling of this tour straight after the t20 world cup dreadful? Yes
Did the rain during what little preparation there was set us up to fail? Yes
Is Root a good tactical captain? Probably not
Are most of these players the match of their Aussie counterparts? Definitely not
Is playing away generally very hard in cricket at the moment with bubbles and quarantine? Certainly
Have we fielded dreadfully? Yep
Does Silverwood look overpromoted? He does

I mean, pick your own choice of reasons. There's a lot to it. I'm sure the ECB will have a review to pick their own favourite reasons.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pookemon on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 11:52:01
I think us old fogey's are blaming the 'de-prioritisation' of the longer version of the game on England's lack of ability to bat long.

We have very few batsmen who seem to have the ability to bat for a whole session, a whole day or score a big hundred.

The assertion is being made that its possibly because there is so much focus now on the shorter form of the game and scoring runs quick rather than having players who can bat long.

That is undoubtedly true but they have picked some players with no pedigree at all.   Hameed's highest score in county cricket, where he averages just 32, is only 120.

There was a time when Hick, ramprakash, moeen etc weren't being picked with averages of 60+.   I think Mo didn't get picket until he scored 1,500 runs 2 seasons on the trot and then it was because he bowled a bit.

One issue for me is the focus on Surrey and Yorkshire.  The disproportionate number of players that come from those teams is ridiculous.  A Surrey youngster will be thrown in with half a good season but one from Worcs or Glamorgan has to wait till they are 27 and scored 10,000 runs.  But by then they have picked up a load of bad habits and can't adapt to new conditions.



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 13:04:38
There's a lot of people lashing out at the moment, as you'd expect in the immediate aftermath. The difficult truth is that it's probably a lot of contributing factors, and people exaggerate/ignore them depending on their own personal beliefs (so basically politics all over again).

Is red ball cricket a bit of an afterthought at county level? Absolutely
Is the amount of talent we have spread too thinly across teams? Absolutely
Does the scheduling mean that we don't encourage fast bowling or spin? Sure
Was the scheduling of this tour straight after the t20 world cup dreadful? Yes
Did the rain during what little preparation there was set us up to fail? Yes
Is Root a good tactical captain? Probably not
Are most of these players the match of their Aussie counterparts? Definitely not
Is playing away generally very hard in cricket at the moment with bubbles and quarantine? Certainly
Have we fielded dreadfully? Yep
Does Silverwood look overpromoted? He does

I mean, pick your own choice of reasons. There's a lot to it. I'm sure the ECB will have a review to pick their own favourite reasons.
Liked that - Sat here applauding that post!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 13:11:09
That is undoubtedly true but they have picked some players with no pedigree at all.   Hameed's highest score in county cricket, where he averages just 32, is only 120.

There was a time when Hick, ramprakash, moeen etc weren't being picked with averages of 60+.   I think Mo didn't get picket until he scored 1,500 runs 2 seasons on the trot and then it was because he bowled a bit.

One issue for me is the focus on Surrey and Yorkshire.  The disproportionate number of players that come from those teams is ridiculous.  A Surrey youngster will be thrown in with half a good season but one from Worcs or Glamorgan has to wait till they are 27 and scored 10,000 runs.  But by then they have picked up a load of bad habits and can't adapt to new conditions.


You are probably right about the bias - I wonder though whether money has a lot to do with it. Have all the best cricketers gone to the likes of and Surrey, Middlesex, Yorks because they have paid the best?

I guess its historically been difficult to get into England football team if you play for an unfashionable club. Closest to home for us has got to have been the question about why Charlie Austin never made it as an England international?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 14:21:42
Don’t forget Shearer & Calderwood who were both called up by Scotland almost immediately after leaving for Blackburn/Aberdeen & Spurs.

This at a time when we were a tier 2 team


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RedRag on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 16:06:48
I think us old fogey's are blaming the 'de-prioritisation' of the longer version of the game on England's lack of ability to bat long.

We have very few batsmen who seem to have the ability to bat for a whole session, a whole day or score a big hundred.

The assertion is being made that its possibly because there is so much focus now on the shorter form of the game and scoring runs quick rather than having players who can bat long.
As an old fogey, I concur with the general assertion.

My question is why do the likes of NZ, Aus and India seem so less "afflicted"?  I doubt Aggers and Co would have been raising the question had Eng. just trounced Aus with similar scores reversed.

The new God isn't limited overs cricket, it's money and you just reach a point in life where you have to accept your views have become irrelevant.

I wasn't overly excited by this series beforehand.  It was fuck off Pakistan and let's milk the Ashes cash cow.  Again. Most other test cricket has become irrelevant.  It just doesn't pay anyone to be the best test team or put in the slog of some tougher tours that can mould an emerging test side into a great one.

And now it's being proposed to have the Football World Cup every two years.  Please, let's keep SOME things special.




Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 17:28:14
Is it because conditions in England favour 'dibbly dobbler' bowlers?

So when our batsmen go to Australia or the West Indies they think 'Fuck me that was quick!'

Then when they get to the sub continent they think 'Fuck me that turned!'

That then results in overseas bowlers coming to England. Our batsmen then think 'Fuck me!'


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Robinz on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 20:18:51
Nomoreheros... Spot on😄


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 20:47:08
Wood is quicker than any of their bowlers, it's not just pure pace.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 21:03:05
Wood is quicker than any of their bowlers, it's not just pure pace.
True. But he doesn't bowl stump to stump and doesn't often get the ball to nip around.

Boland is in the Alderman/McGrath mode.
Starc in the Mitchell Johnson mode
Cummings just a decent quick bowler



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pookemon on Tuesday, December 28, 2021, 21:18:30
True. But he doesn't bowl stump to stump and doesn't often get the ball to nip around.

Boland is in the Alderman/McGrath mode.
Starc in the Mitchell Johnson mode
Cummings just a decent quick bowler



There is Mediocraty in the county system but it has always produced top class bowlers.   Anderson and Broad to name just 2.  However it very rarely produces a decent spinner and almost never a wrist spinner.

The issue is not the bowling but the batting.   County scores are low, particularly when played in may and September, there's just not enough time at the crease.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Thursday, January 6, 2022, 09:13:22
England 12* after Crawley survives only because of a no ball. What a batting performance by England thus far…relatively speaking


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, January 6, 2022, 09:20:12
The way things were going towards the end here 400+ is an innings win score.

I see Khawaja was dropped off Leach 100 runs short of where he ended. Poor fucker, Leach, it's just not really happening for him this series and I'm not convinced it's his fault.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Friday, January 7, 2022, 02:40:40
It's as if we sent a team of Village Fucking Idiots to face up to the Windies 80's bowling attack.  This lot are a National embarrassment, which in the long run may be the only small crumb that can be rtaken from this series.  If they had shown a bit of fight, got a bit closer in some games, then the powers that be and the team could have argued about "but for a bit of luck", "tried hard in tough conditions" etc.

As it is, they are a fucking disgrace, but only a symptom of the issues facing England at Test level.  It's been coming a while, which leads me to another gripe while sitting through this....

The in studio team BT Sport put together is just as fucking bad.  What is the point of asking a current international team mate (even if in the white ball game) or even recent retiree to provide "insight"  Ali is a puppet sat on a sofa, one without anyone hand up his arse to provide any sort of entertainment as Sooty and Sweep surely would have mustered.

Worse though is Cook.  It's like someone plonked a cardboard cutout on the sofa to provide analysis.  Don't get me wrong, great player and clearly has some thoughts on the technique side, but no appetite to provide any sort of critical analysis whatsoever.  "The Aussies have bowled well".  It's fucking Test cricket you plonk, they aren't going to chuck some underarms balls down the wicket for us.  To be honest, the current state of affairs, I think, goes back to him as Captain.  I can't believe his captaincy (after listening to him here) provided anything of value to any player, and probably relied on his ability with the bat to motivate.  He seems even more dull than I expected, defensive as hell (tactically) and has helped sew the seeds of what we no have at Test level.  A team full of nobodies, maybe Broad being the only one with a personality and a bit of bite in him.  It's a sad state of affairs that we revere Stokes when he is little more than average at Test level, relying on his undoubted brilliance in the short form.

I applaud the job we did in turning around our short form performances, but we've sacrificed Test cricket at the alter to do it, it would seem.

ECB should refund the fans tickets and air fares and bring them home early, abandon the series.  Or send out 11 fans and show the cricketing world just how seriously they have taken it.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pookemon on Friday, January 7, 2022, 06:54:38
At least wood - who shouldn't be batting at 8 in any form of cricket - is showing a bit of fight.  Scored more than the top 4 managed and will be going past the openers' totals for the series soon.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Friday, January 7, 2022, 07:19:43
100 for Bairstow. Well done that man.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pookemon on Friday, January 7, 2022, 07:33:52
Absolutely - 100 in a series is good in this team to do it in one innings with backs to the wall is a great effort.

Just seen that in 2021 Crawley had 16 innings and scored just 173 runs.

Why was he even on the tour?  

There just doesn't seem to be anyone removed from the team tapping the coach on the shoulder and saying "I know you've invested alot into him and he's a great lad to have around but he's utter dogshite!  I saw this bloke playing at Gloucester who looks worth a punt"


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, January 7, 2022, 08:36:31
He was picked originally because he went to Ed Smith's school, and then made that beautiful 273 against Pakistan which has basically guaranteed him a career.

Robt, I must say your overnight rant was a joy to read, especially knowing England showed a bit of fight after! I would say on Ali/Cook though, that if you haven't seen the clip of Ali criticising Cook's captaincy whilst sat next to him, you should seek it out. Glorious stuff.

Fair play to Bairstow and Stokes and Wood for showing some fight. And I see Stokes was bowled and the bails didn't fall off, which does at least provide some comedy.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Moss on Friday, January 7, 2022, 09:40:36
It's as if we sent a team of Village Fucking Idiots to face up to the Windies 80's bowling attack.  This lot are a National embarrassment, which in the long run may be the only small crumb that can be rtaken from this series.  If they had shown a bit of fight, got a bit closer in some games, then the powers that be and the team could have argued about "but for a bit of luck", "tried hard in tough conditions" etc.

As it is, they are a fucking disgrace, but only a symptom of the issues facing England at Test level.  It's been coming a while, which leads me to another gripe while sitting through this....

The in studio team BT Sport put together is just as fucking bad.  What is the point of asking a current international team mate (even if in the white ball game) or even recent retiree to provide "insight"  Ali is a puppet sat on a sofa, one without anyone hand up his arse to provide any sort of entertainment as Sooty and Sweep surely would have mustered.

Worse though is Cook.  It's like someone plonked a cardboard cutout on the sofa to provide analysis.  Don't get me wrong, great player and clearly has some thoughts on the technique side, but no appetite to provide any sort of critical analysis whatsoever.  "The Aussies have bowled well".  It's fucking Test cricket you plonk, they aren't going to chuck some underarms balls down the wicket for us.  To be honest, the current state of affairs, I think, goes back to him as Captain.  I can't believe his captaincy (after listening to him here) provided anything of value to any player, and probably relied on his ability with the bat to motivate.  He seems even more dull than I expected, defensive as hell (tactically) and has helped sew the seeds of what we no have at Test level.  A team full of nobodies, maybe Broad being the only one with a personality and a bit of bite in him.  It's a sad state of affairs that we revere Stokes when he is little more than average at Test level, relying on his undoubted brilliance in the short form.

I applaud the job we did in turning around our short form performances, but we've sacrificed Test cricket at the alter to do it, it would seem.

ECB should refund the fans tickets and air fares and bring them home early, abandon the series.  Or send out 11 fans and show the cricketing world just how seriously they have taken it.

Sorry that is a bit harsh. No prep, locked in bubbles, Covid in the camp, no warm up games. Jimmy Anderson or Mark Wood no personality? Stokes little more than average Test player?  I'm as disappointed as anyone (can't believe how much sleep I've given up for such a load of toss) and there is a serious problem with preparing English players with the skills to compete at Test level but I think you are being a bit hysterical.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Friday, January 7, 2022, 12:28:21
Let me know what Stokes' Test averages for both batting and bowling are again?  Other than Root there isn't a test quality batsman in our squad or even near it and because of that, like Cook before him, he ends up as default captain, a job for which he is clearly not suited.

Anderson is a star quality bowler, he doesn't imprint his personality on a game.  I'm not talking about how he talks off the pitch either.  I'm talking in a cricketing sense.  Broad has something, although it's more often displayed against his fellow team mates.  I'm not having much of a pop at the bowlers though, although Leach is a problem.  They've not bowled the right length often enough, but given they all seem to do it I have to assume it comes from coaching and how we prepare.

Covid is an excuse that is fair enough, but both teams have been impacted, Australia to the point of having players needing to drop out.  The prep is our own fault to degree and goes back to my major criticism which is the way we have approached Test cricket for the past 10 years or so.  You'll note I called the team a symptom, not the cause.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, January 7, 2022, 12:44:26
Last four years (2018-present), Stokes averages in tests, not elite on the world stage but better than anyone else we have, ignoring the fact he bowls a bit and is a good fielder. Fwiw, since 2018

Root 46.17
Stokes 37.01
Buttler 32.49
Foakes 31.53
Burns 30.92
Pope 29.79
Denly 29.53
Sibley 28.94
Lawrence 27.23
Crawley 26.62
Malan 25.23
Roy 18.70
Hameed 17.58

It's a sorry old mess.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Friday, January 7, 2022, 12:56:46
In the 1990-1999 period, when we were shit and before the introduction of Central Contracts (which did have a positive impact on test cricket in this country for a period), 8 batsmen had an average of 34 or higher who played at least 20 Tests in that period.  Hick with 34 being the lowest, someone who never really achieved anything much of note in Test cricket.

Stokes with 37 is OK, average for a Test top 6 batsman, nothing more.  He is a different beast in the shorter forms of the game, of that there is no doubt.  That's the problem, the past ten years have created players who are only much kop at the money spinning versions.  Stokes would be the 8th best batsman of the 90's for us!!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: fittons_coaching_badge on Friday, January 7, 2022, 13:36:12
Without Archer and Stone, and with a ropey batting line up, a star all rounder who comes into the series without any cricket for 4 months and off the  back of mental health problems this was always going to be a hill to steep but I did hope for a more competitive series as I still don't think Australia are that good.

Sam Billings has been called up with injury concerns over YJB and Buttler so I expect he will play in 5th Test which is harsh on Ben Foakes. 

I think the squad for the 3 tests in WI in March will make really interesting reading.

Will they take both Broad and Anderson?
I would expect Saqib Mahmood to debut. I think Archer is out until the summer and if I'm honest I think his test cricket days are done but will Oliver Stone be available?
Would mind seeing Brydon Carse given a go/
I would like them to invest properly in a Mason Crane or Matt Parkinson.
I like the opener at Warks (Yates I think)
Bohannon from Lancs has been getting good wrap and was part of the Lions squad.
Will they persist with any of a Crawley/Hameed/Burns?  Will Sibley get called up again?

A lot of questions for me ...

Also Root as captain.  As Stokes is the only one people will call a viable option but I dont think he is I'd like to see Root carry on, but with a new coach.  Kirsten or Jayawardene for me.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Friday, January 7, 2022, 15:12:42
Time to rebuild the batting, bowling and keeping.

We have another Jack Russell issue. Foakes is the best natural keeper in the country but they dont think he can bat well enough. So, we have tried to convert Bairstow and Buttler into a keeper. Bracey is also in the wings but his nervous debut showed he is a way off as either a test keeper or batsman.

We have to address the fact that our two best bowlers are past their best and reaching the end of the line. Time to let Anderson and Broad move into media careers. Their replacements aren't ready but need to develop quickly. I know Broad got 5 wickets in the 1st innings of this test, but a few years ago he wouldnt have conceeded 100 runs to do so. He's just a couple of mph too slow now. Anderson is the same, but when you start off as one of the all time greats, the decline takes a while to properly kick in.

All rounders. I think Stokes and Bairstow are the only two good enough in this category.

We should persist with Root and Malan. They are the only players capable of batting long, but even then I have doubts over Malan. I fear that all of the other batsmen that England have flirted with are 'dashers'. They have achieved their averages by being flat track bullies or being able to score a quick 50 and get out. You need 3-4 players capable of batting for more than a day once a series to be a good test team.

Of the other batsmen, I fear they are either 20-50 over specialists or technically flawed. Hameed has regressed significantly since debut. Burns is inconsistent and has terrible technique. Crawley is a bowling machine batsman. Sibley a technically flawed crab. Bairstow a lower order bottom handed swisher. Buttler a 20 over player. Pope is the interesting one - Good technique, but either can't read spin or is mentally shot. (I think he is worth persisting with). Billings is a bottom handed one day lower order average wicket keeper.

In conclusion, I see the problems, but not necessarily the answers!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, January 8, 2022, 10:02:47
Better day for Leach today, shows what a spinner can do when the game actually gets to the fourth day, which hasn't exactly been often in recent times. He's not Swann by any means, and is a better attacking bowler than he is a defensive one, but he's the best we have.

Not really worth complaining about captaincy again, but that's two innings in a row where Khawaja has been within one shot of a hundred and we've bought on Dawid Malan's filthy leggies. At least put some pressure on him, for goodness sakes.

Must say this test has been broadly in line with my expectation for the series - Aus a better team, but not by an embarrassing margin and moments for England. It's just that the first few tests were so wildly in Aus' favour that it's painful.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, January 8, 2022, 11:11:36
I watched until lunch - Thought we went too defensive too quickly. Got a couple of wickets despite doing so though. Pope looked a better keeper than Buttler and Bairstow! Not sure what I hope for. Would 30-40 runs each for the openers be a good thing or a bad one?  Would a rain influence draw paper over the cracks?

Another low score for Hameed and not outs from Root and Malan would be the best we could hope for.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, January 9, 2022, 11:54:38
We didn't lose!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: adje on Sunday, January 9, 2022, 12:24:47
Root "proud"


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Sunday, January 9, 2022, 14:27:44
We didn't lose!

A half decent batting performance in both innings and a bit of rain.

At least they showed some fight, just a shame it’s taken so long.

I wouldn’t mind us losing so much if we at least made a game of it


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, January 9, 2022, 15:41:55
Watched until lunch again - The pitch wasn't doing anything. Hameed was dropped a couple of overs before he played the same shot to let Carey make amends. Technical flaw in his batting. Would imagine he's shot.

Crawley looked good. Likes the ball on his legs. But, doesn't move his feet and susceptible to one on the stump going through bat and pad or outside the off. I think of him as a good bowling machine batter.

Malan didn't move his feet either. Ridiculous. Root and Stokes looked in no trouble.

Need to send Stokes home with Buttler. Get them both fixed. Not sure how bad Bairstow's injury is. But, nothing to play for here, so send him home to if it will help in the long run.

Can see us playing a Lions team in the next match, which aint a bad thing.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, January 9, 2022, 16:23:40
Oh I think Stokes is probably going to be sent home, they'll just be waiting for scan results before making that final decision. Stephen Finn suggested on the radio that sometimes you can't do a reliable scan until a couple of days after the game.

Think you're right on most of the technical stuff. Crawley *looks* a player, no doubt at all, worth investing time in but setting up on off means he's going to get pinned lbw occasionally. His technique suits Australian/SA wickets I think, I'm not sure he's going to be piling on the runs at home all that often. Hopefully he's smart enough to adjust.

Hameed just wasn't ready - he struggles against high pace in the Championship so this tour always felt a really tough ask. As you say, caught between playing forward and back repeatedly and kept getting the edge.

Lions wise, we can only really play who is in the country - which means the batting has to be Pope, Lawrence and Billings taking the gloves, unless you fancy doing something really funky like Burns in the middle order.

Bairstow had an excellent test and fair play to him for that, but I think we can get a bit carried away about one good performance - he's been pretty much useless for four years before this. Gets himself another chance if fit though.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, January 9, 2022, 19:24:41
Oh I think Stokes is probably going to be sent home, they'll just be waiting for scan results before making that final decision. Stephen Finn suggested on the radio that sometimes you can't do a reliable scan until a couple of days after the game.

Think you're right on most of the technical stuff. Crawley *looks* a player, no doubt at all, worth investing time in but setting up on off means he's going to get pinned lbw occasionally. His technique suits Australian/SA wickets I think, I'm not sure he's going to be piling on the runs at home all that often. Hopefully he's smart enough to adjust.

Hameed just wasn't ready - he struggles against high pace in the Championship so this tour always felt a really tough ask. As you say, caught between playing forward and back repeatedly and kept getting the edge.

Lions wise, we can only really play who is in the country - which means the batting has to be Pope, Lawrence and Billings taking the gloves, unless you fancy doing something really funky like Burns in the middle order.

Bairstow had an excellent test and fair play to him for that, but I think we can get a bit carried away about one good performance - he's been pretty much useless for four years before this. Gets himself another chance if fit though.
Bairstow has been inconsistent. Too much bottom hand - A swisher. More of a batsman than his father but less of a wicket keeper!

Again, the problem with England is we have a team full of 'all rounders'. They can mostly all do a bit of everything, but many of them can't do one thing well.

Of what's out there, I'd be inclined to go for:

1. Burns
2. Crawley
3. Malan
4. Root
5. Pope
6. Lawrence
7. Billings 
8. Woakes
9. Overton
10. Robinson
11. Wood

You could argue Anderson & Broad for Overton and Woakes to enable them to say farewell to the Aussies. But, given there is nothing to play for, you might as well give the others a go. (Woakes might be injured)


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, January 14, 2022, 05:17:16
Well, here we are showing some promise again. Let's bowl them out cheaply, then we'll probably be knocked over for less than 50 runs.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Friday, January 14, 2022, 06:30:30
Never seen such a green pitch. 150 would be a good score.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, January 14, 2022, 07:43:36
I didn't see the first session but seems it's settled down a little now. Pitch does look very green, but then so do many in NZ and those usually get big scores on them.

Either way, better conditions for England but Robinson seems to be injured and Wood getting whacked, so Root bowling already.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Friday, January 14, 2022, 08:18:02
Never seen such a green pitch. 150 would be a good score.
So 179-4 with Robinson looking unable to bowl doesn't look so good!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, January 14, 2022, 08:29:52
With Travis Head playing like a prime De Villiers.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, January 14, 2022, 08:37:53
It was all looking good for the first hour, now the pitch has settled down a bit.

Labuschagne's dismissal was marvellous though.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Friday, January 14, 2022, 08:43:01
It was all looking good for the first hour, now the pitch has settled down a bit.

Labuschagne's dismissal was marvellous though.
Village cricket at its best!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, January 14, 2022, 08:56:59
I'm not convinced he actually stumbled, I think the fall was to try and cover his blushes by making it look like he was off balance.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Friday, January 14, 2022, 08:58:51
With Travis Head playing like a prime De Villiers.

He’s gone, phew.

Looks like the Aussies are still managing a good score though. Run through them now and we might just be able to take a slender lead into the Oz second innings.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Friday, January 14, 2022, 08:59:19
I'm not convinced he actually stumbled, I think the fall was to try and cover his blushes by making it look like he was off balance.

Looked like a genuine fall to me


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Friday, January 14, 2022, 09:00:43
Reading on the bbc sounds like Sam Billings is having the time of his life! This is good to hear, a bit of positivity and some chatter


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, January 14, 2022, 09:12:46
I'm not convinced he actually stumbled, I think the fall was to try and cover his blushes by making it look like he was off balance.

I think it was a legitimate stumble but as a second movement, trying to turn round to see what had happened long after the ball had passed him and hit the stumps - the intial movement was just way too far across the stumps, like trying to flick down leg except the ball wasn't leg side enough and he went too far.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Friday, January 14, 2022, 14:00:42
I'm not convinced he actually stumbled, I think the fall was to try and cover his blushes by making it look like he was off balance.

Just saw it from another angle and he hit his leg with his bat as he brought it down, made it look even more genuine


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Saturday, January 15, 2022, 08:42:48
England collapse as predictably as night follows day


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Saturday, January 15, 2022, 09:55:02
This is just not good enough. These are professional sportsmen who have shown an abject inability to properly play the sport they are paid to play. It’s easy to get vitriolic as a supporter of this England team but I think it’s deserved. Joe Root makes what I’m sure he thinks are the right noises whenever we get whooped but it’s getting tired now. Time after time there is literally no improvement. He should step down regardless of whether there’s an obvious successor, England are better off taking a shot in the dark rather than persisting with him as captain. Is there somebody who could come in as a specialist captain? Somebody who can at least organise and motivate this shambles? That’s a question for you Nemo, you know your stuff.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, January 15, 2022, 11:06:30
Jesu Christi that ball from Wood to get Khawaja was a beauty.

As for captains, I don't know really. The experienced county captains around the squad or Lions would be Burns, Billings, Abell, Rhodes and Vince, but I don't know that any of them are tactical wizards. To a point I think captaincy is a bit overrated, there are very few good captains of bad teams - Brearley and Stephen Fleming, maybe Jason Holder are the only candidates I can think of.

Eoin Morgan is the only obviously excellent captain in England and he's not a test match option.

The problem is there aren't obvious players to come in. The current players are the best we have, more or less, and we need them to get better. I'd be looking at coaching as the main area we can improve. Also preparation - India A play twice as much cricket as the England Lions do and shockingly enough, their players debut and look ready. Ours look out of their depth.



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, January 15, 2022, 11:14:32
Jesu Christi that ball from Wood to get Khawaja was a beauty.

As for captains, I don't know really. The experienced county captains around the squad or Lions would be Burns, Billings, Abell, Rhodes and Vince, but I don't know that any of them are tactical wizards. To a point I think captaincy is a bit overrated, there are very few good captains of bad teams - Brearley and Stephen Fleming, maybe Jason Holder are the only candidates I can think of.

Eoin Morgan is the only obviously excellent captain in England and he's not a test match option.

The problem is there aren't obvious players to come in. The current players are the best we have, more or less, and we need them to get better. I'd be looking at coaching as the main area we can improve. Also preparation - India A play twice as much cricket as the England Lions do and shockingly enough, their players debut and look ready. Ours look out of their depth.


Agree with that - snorter from Wood!

The batsmen are ALL technically flawed - some more so than others.

Root is a good Test batsman. I think Pope can be saved. Crawley has the same issues as Hick. Malan, I'm starting to worry about. The others are middle order bashers.

Adding one player who could bat long would change the dynamics of the side immensely.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Saturday, January 15, 2022, 12:19:39
It doesn’t matter who the captain is when you are consistently bowled out for 200 or less, especially when the opposition are regularly scoring 400+

But this isn’t a new problem, we haven’t won a test down under for 10 years, in fact it’s something like 12-0 with 2 draws in the last 3 tours.

It coincides with a pretty good time at white ball cricket for England, so clearly that’s where the focus has been.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, January 15, 2022, 14:25:39
Yes, its not because of guile, its because our batsmen can't score runs or occupy the crease and our bowlers look threatening in short spells but often fail to capitalise on good starts.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, January 16, 2022, 08:20:13
Hello  :o


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Sunday, January 16, 2022, 08:22:44
Have we scored as many as 271 at all on this tour?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, January 16, 2022, 08:51:44
Purple patch for Mr Wood. Two wickets on no balls too (Broad and Woakes).

Mr Burns disappointingly out just before tea.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, January 16, 2022, 09:18:44
And there goes Malan.....and Crawley


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, January 16, 2022, 09:46:22
....and Stokes!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, January 16, 2022, 10:07:06
That ball to Root sums up England's series. Utterly unplayable.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, January 16, 2022, 10:09:23
Poor Root - Breaks his favourite bat then gets a grubber!

The end is nigh.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, January 16, 2022, 10:31:06
Seven for 39 since the opening partnership was broken.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, January 16, 2022, 10:31:57
Was just going to post about Billings technical flaw(all bottom hand) being exposed in his wicket when Pope walked around his stumps and lost his!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Robinz on Sunday, January 16, 2022, 10:32:51
What a shambles


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, January 16, 2022, 10:38:04
Just seen on Twitter that Dawid Malan's first child was born this morning six weeks early and on the other side of the world. Can probably forgive him being a bit distracted today.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, January 16, 2022, 10:42:18
OMG! Never a good sign when you pull a ball onto your leg stump!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, January 16, 2022, 10:43:28
I know it doesn't matter in the slightest bit Jesus Robinson couldn't have gone further towards leg if he'd taken guard next to the umpire.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, January 16, 2022, 10:43:36
At least it's over.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, January 16, 2022, 10:44:36
And Ollie Robinson sums it up. Run away to leg side and let a full toss hit middle


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: swindon74 on Sunday, January 16, 2022, 11:07:03
What a pathetic series that was! I’m sure it’s been said before, but will all the money being pumped into 20/20 and this shit 100 format of the game, has just left test cricket to rot in the shadows. Where do we even go from here? I hope some sackings are made and a restructure of the county championship. For me test cricket is my favourite format, it would be nice to see us compete again.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, January 16, 2022, 11:13:39
Aus just won the world T20, focusing on white ball cricket doesn't seem to have caused them much difficulty.

Huge amount of things that could be improved. Not sure if I'd trust the ECB to do any of them.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Sunday, January 16, 2022, 11:22:04
England will go to the West Indies and probably be competitive and it will paper over the cracks of this shambles.

They then play at home series against New Zealand & India (any results possible) but will probably be ok.

Then will depend on how South Africa are by next winter.

The upshot is that nothing will change in the short term.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Sunday, January 16, 2022, 14:09:19
What a pathetic series that was! I’m sure it’s been said before, but will all the money being pumped into 20/20 and this shit 100 format of the game, has just left test cricket to rot in the shadows. Where do we even go from here? I hope some sackings are made and a restructure of the county championship. For me test cricket is my favourite format, it would be nice to see us compete again.

Limited overs is fun and all, but like you I love watching test cricket. When you can predict with such consistent accuracy that England are about to capitulate it’s depressing. Seriously needs to be addressed. I don’t want to watch that drivel and it’s upsetting


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RedRag on Sunday, January 16, 2022, 19:31:38
I think we should be patient before reaching conclusions.

It's rumoured that Sue Gray will be reporting that England has drawn the series.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, January 20, 2022, 07:57:00
Women's Ashes starts today. I'm rather looking forward to it, mostly because there's at least some chance of a contest.

Edit: England 106/1, do not adjust your TV sets.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Thursday, January 20, 2022, 23:00:50
Women's Ashes starts today. I'm rather looking forward to it, mostly because there's at least some chance of a contest.

Edit: England 106/1, do not adjust your TV sets.

Made more of a game of it than the men, but still lost by 9 wickets


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: pantomime dame on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 06:37:11
V the WI in the T20 format tonight 20.00 on BT. Looking forward to it.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 19:58:54
The reassuring feeling of being 10/3, we can do this in any format!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 20:17:22
24/4. Eek


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 20:35:48
39/5 @ 10 overs. Not even on track to get their lowest score ever!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 20:36:49
Just as well that we focus on white ball cricket :D


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 20:37:22
39/6 10.1 overs! Comedy run out


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 20:42:41
49/7 11.4 overs


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 20:44:10
49/7 . Jesus wept..

is the wicket dodgy or something


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 20:45:04
49/7 . Jesus wept..

is the wicket dodgy or something

There's quite a lot of bounce in it, and the ball did move early on... but it doesn't look a double figure score pitch. 140-50 par maybe? Not easy to tell from the other side of the world mind.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 20:47:09
cheers. bugger


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 21:02:01
Beaten the lowest score now! 84/7 off 16 overs


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 21:05:15
85/8 16.4


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 21:11:50
100/8 18.2 overs


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 21:16:37
103 all out 19.4 overs.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 21:17:46
Not ideal.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 22:11:31
We've got a wicket!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 22:45:01
I was looking forward to watching Mahmood. He's just bowled an over of pies to allow King a 50 and to leave the scores level.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 22:46:08
Just the 9 wicket loss then!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 22:56:58
it's a hammering!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 22:59:01
it's a hammering!
Against the worst ranked team in 20/20


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 23:15:55
Eh, the things happen, lots of randomness in T20. We're a terrific white ball outfit and this is a team with maybe five players from our first choice team.

As funny as the parallels with the tests are, we're in a totally different place between the formats.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, January 22, 2022, 23:27:00
Eh, the things happen, lots of randomness in T20. We're a terrific white ball outfit and this is a team with maybe five players from our first choice team.

As funny as the parallels with the tests are, we're in a totally different place between the formats.
Didn't look it tonight.

Very poor performance.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, January 23, 2022, 20:01:31
Slightly better start today.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, January 23, 2022, 20:31:32
Slightly better start today.
Good job Windies have dropped a couple!

Banton unlucky. Vince not so much!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Mr Stevens on Sunday, January 23, 2022, 21:50:32
Started well, and there's a Swindon Town flag there. One of our wealthier supporters.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, January 23, 2022, 23:11:19
Jordan hit for 21 - England to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Sunday, January 23, 2022, 23:22:46
They just held on, despite trying their best to lose it


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Mr Stevens on Sunday, January 23, 2022, 23:23:21
Thank goodness Shepherd didn't take that single to keep the strike.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, January 23, 2022, 23:23:58
They just held on, despite trying their best to lose it
Unbelievable! Mahmood goes for 28 in the last over! They win by 1.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Sunday, January 23, 2022, 23:25:04
Unbelievable! Mahmood goes for 28 in the last over! They win by 1.

He was lucky that the second ball wasn’t called a wide


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, January 24, 2022, 08:35:50
Crikey, I went to bed with them 100/8 and sunk. Must have been quite the partnership!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Monday, January 24, 2022, 12:53:41
Crikey, I went to bed with them 100/8 and sunk. Must have been quite the partnership!
It helps when Mahmood was bowling in the slot.

At one point Morgan shouted to him 'No wides, no wides, no wides!'


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, January 26, 2022, 21:37:43
Not sure where they were hiding this Rovman Powell chap, but I'd guess we might see a little more of him in the future.

England's seam bowling is... not brilliant. Get well soon Jofra.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Wednesday, January 26, 2022, 22:07:03
Must have been mega-pies to go for that many!

Just watching England make the first over look like a mine field!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Monday, February 7, 2022, 15:59:04
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/59754595

Completely missed this. I read somewhere that Giles had gone but had no idea Silverwood had followed. For the best I’d say. Any kind of change is worth a go considering how abject we were during the Ashes


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Monday, February 7, 2022, 16:02:54
Aussie coming in.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Monday, February 7, 2022, 16:05:40
Aussie coming in.

Which one? I see Langer has left the Aussies but it’d be a bit mad if he swapped them for us.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Monday, February 7, 2022, 16:19:43
Collingwood, interim. And Langer mentioned in despatches.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, February 8, 2022, 16:36:00
Supposedly Broad and Anderson dropped for the West Indies. Must say, it's very English to drop some bowlers because the batting has been shit.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Hunk on Tuesday, February 8, 2022, 16:54:50
Supposedly Broad and Anderson dropped for the West Indies. Must say, it's very English to drop some bowlers because the batting has been shit.

That seems mad to me. Yes, Anderson is nearly 40, but it’s not as though his continual selection is getting in the way of some prodigious talent making the team instead. And he was still statistically our best bowler during this ashes I believe. Not so sure about Broad, but certainly can’t understand dropping Anderson.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, March 8, 2022, 13:23:32
The Windies tests start today, with an attack of Woakes, Coverton, Wood (a bit injured), Stokes (a lot injured) and Leach.

I like everyone involved in that, most of them quite a lot, but blimey does that look a lot more callow than Anderson/Broad/Robinson did last summer.

Still, the Windies are every bit as much a flawed team as we are so should be well balanced at least. Windies 2-1 for me.

Most importantly though, England have finally picked Stokes, Foakes and Woakes together. Beautiful.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Saxondale on Tuesday, March 8, 2022, 13:25:57
Won the toss and batting first.
We always seem to start a test series undercooked.  Id love us not to crumble but ive seen to much of it to think we'll do anything but.

I guess well know by this evening.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, March 8, 2022, 13:30:10
Won the toss and batting first.
We always seem to start a test series undercooked.  Id love us not to crumble but ive seen to much of it to think we'll do anything but.

I guess well know by this evening.

Did have a warm up game this time, which is progress. Unfortunately it managed to injure Robinson and Wood...


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, March 8, 2022, 14:07:32
17-2

Red ball reset looking a lot like the old stuff.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Tuesday, March 8, 2022, 14:15:14


Most importantly though, England have finally picked Stokes, Foakes and Woakes together. Beautiful.

Methinks that'll be the high point of this test. Did I say test? I meant series.

Very difficult not to be a glass half empty with England right now.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, March 8, 2022, 14:30:15
A lot to be said for having an experienced swing bowler opening up isn't there? Roach is a very good bowler, and that was a very good ball.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Tuesday, March 8, 2022, 15:14:31
This is a real shambles. Out of the frying pan and into the fire for anyone coming in


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Tuesday, March 8, 2022, 17:46:19
At least we now seem to achieving some consistency in our batting performances.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Tuesday, March 8, 2022, 18:09:40
At least we now seem to achieving some consistency in our batting performances.

Ben Stokes very nearly hit his test batting average. Onwards and upwards


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Tuesday, March 8, 2022, 18:17:48
We're just shite :fear:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Tuesday, March 8, 2022, 20:23:30
England in serious danger here of posting 300+. I’m beside myself


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Tuesday, March 8, 2022, 20:25:04
We were shite early on😀


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, March 9, 2022, 14:13:43
This is more like the post-Strauss but still good England - being dug out of a hole by the middle and lower order. Certainly progress on being shit all the way down as we have been the last couple of years!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, March 9, 2022, 14:18:59
We are playing the second worst Test team, maybe worst because our position at the bottom of the pile is somewhat influenced by five tests against Australia.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Wednesday, March 9, 2022, 15:02:03
Hopefully Leach can last long enough to help JB get 150. As I type this he edges through the slips.

Edit: he can’t. Good catch though. Lost that in the sun for a sec


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Wednesday, March 9, 2022, 15:07:25
I'm guessing the wicket is dead so expect the West Indies to knock up a big score


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, March 9, 2022, 15:08:38
We managed to get over 300, how exciting.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Wednesday, March 9, 2022, 15:09:39
If conditions don't change we may end up with a draw😀


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, March 9, 2022, 17:10:54
I don't think Jack Leach bowling 6 overs of the first 19 was the plan.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, March 9, 2022, 21:22:24
Chris Woakes had a stinker of a day and now Foakes is standing up to the stumps for him. Sheesh.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, March 16, 2022, 13:02:53
Coverton and Wood injured so both Saqib Mahmood and Matt Fisher debut in the second test. Somewhere, Stuart Broad smiles at his collection of voodoo dolls.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Thursday, March 17, 2022, 21:11:59
Coverton and Wood injured so both Saqib Mahmood and Matt Fisher debut in the second test. Somewhere, Stuart Broad smiles at his collection of voodoo dolls.

Might be a fortunate enforced change. I like the look of Fisher and Mahmoud being in the side might demonstrate to the selectors of the benefits of picking a specialist old ball bowler. For some reason we've got into the habit of picking 4 quicks  that all want the new ball, so your change bowlers aren't doing what they're good at and are a bit narky as a result.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Thursday, March 24, 2022, 16:44:54
Another stunning start by England 😪


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, March 24, 2022, 16:47:23
To be fair this pitch looks a whole lot different to the first two tests. Suspect this game isn't going four days, let alone five.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Thursday, March 24, 2022, 19:38:24
Top up their suntans then😀


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, March 24, 2022, 22:00:03
Well that was unexpected.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Thursday, March 24, 2022, 23:56:55
Well that was unexpected.

The batting order is upside down :D


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, March 26, 2022, 22:06:30
To be fair this pitch looks a whole lot different to the first two tests. Suspect this game isn't going four days, let alone five.

Well, it's getting to four. Probably not past lunch though, unless Sachin Mahmood and Brian Leach fancy top scoring again.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, March 27, 2022, 14:02:50
If we somehow manage a lead of 100 it’s competitive


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Sunday, March 27, 2022, 21:30:26
So Root has said he wants to remain captain, and clearly he’s still the best batsman we have, but questions have to be asked again where do we go from here.

Should he remain as captain, do we have another realistic option?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, March 27, 2022, 22:33:06
The fact that we don't have another realistic option is part of the problem.

There needs to be radical change, but there is nothing to change to!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Thursday, March 31, 2022, 15:45:50
Well at least the women's team are providing some cheer, particularly after looking down & out early in the group stage.

Hopefully they can turn the Aussies over in the early hours on Sunday.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, April 3, 2022, 06:46:23
Well at least the women's team are providing some cheer, particularly after looking down & out early in the group stage.

Hopefully they can turn the Aussies over in the early hours on Sunday.

Not looking likely at the moment as the Aussies scored loads. Free on Sky's YouTube if anyone wants to watch the tail end: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQRStmrXumE


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, April 3, 2022, 07:42:23
All done. Nat Sciver scored 148* in a losing cause, which was a brilliant effort, but nobody else got past the mid-20s. Australia too good, as we've said quite enough times this winter.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Munichred on Sunday, April 3, 2022, 21:00:27
Just watching golf in US. Former player David Feherty is one of the commentators. Quote: "... his swing is like a toilet door on a prawn trawler." With his accent it made I larf  :)

Sorry, wrong sport...


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, April 15, 2022, 08:37:43
Root steps down finally:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/60895801


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: pantomime dame on Friday, April 15, 2022, 13:14:13
Root steps down finally:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/60895801
End of an era.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Friday, April 15, 2022, 13:16:58
End of an era.

End of an error.

Sorry, couldn't help myself, but I feel it is not only a bad pun but also true.  He was never Captain material, he was the batsman we needed to build around but have someone else worry about the tactics.  Trouble was, we simply haven't developed them - supporting Batsmen, or Captain material.  Not in the long game.  We seem unable to focus on more than one format - the late 90's saw big changes that resulted in the great team of 00's and then we shifted to One Day, utterly changing our approach to that game but losing focus on Test cricket at the same time.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, April 15, 2022, 19:07:47
Conflicted on his legacy - definitely right to go, but a bit odd timing wise - considering the ECB doesn't have anybody making decisions in it at the moment and seven weeks before the first test. You'd have thought he'd want to have a chat with the new coach before making a decision, but perhaps they have someone lined up and he's been given the nod.

Legacy then - completely agree he was a bad tactical captain on the field and in selection. In particular, he couldn't captain spinners at all (despite being a fairly good one himself) and continually broke his fastest bowlers. I have some sympathy with his lack of captaincy experience when he got the job, but he didn't really improve as he got that experience either.

However, he was very good at the non-tactical parts of being captain. The players clearly liked him - even the ones who could reasonably not have - his batting was still absolutely exceptional and he was a great 'ambassador' for the team - easy to sniff at that sort of stuff but during Covid especially it must have been fucking hard to remain as professional as he did at all times.

The right time to stop being captain. Maybe he'd have gone earlier if there was an heir apparent - the best captain of my lifetime (Hussain) could do that because Michael Vaughan was ready. There's nobody ready now, and we'll probably have to go for a short term "do it for the summer and we'll see" type appointment - to be honest England could do with a bit of picking for the now and not just constantly planning "for" the next ashes.

I hope he plays on for many years as a specialist bat and scores a ton of runs.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Friday, April 15, 2022, 19:14:37
That last sentence is key for me.  Not only should he now focus on being the star specialist batsman for this team, but the ECB should ensure whoever takes charge does not lean on him and his experience.    Wouldn't normally say that, but he should be insulated from having to worry about anything bar racking up hundreds.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RedRag on Saturday, April 16, 2022, 11:12:40
Conflicted on his legacy - definitely right to go, but a bit odd timing wise - considering the ECB doesn't have anybody making decisions in it at the moment and seven weeks before the first test. You'd have thought he'd want to have a chat with the new coach before making a decision, but perhaps they have someone lined up and he's been given the nod.

Legacy then - completely agree he was a bad tactical captain on the field and in selection. In particular, he couldn't captain spinners at all (despite being a fairly good one himself) and continually broke his fastest bowlers. I have some sympathy with his lack of captaincy experience when he got the job, but he didn't really improve as he got that experience either.

However, he was very good at the non-tactical parts of being captain. The players clearly liked him - even the ones who could reasonably not have - his batting was still absolutely exceptional and he was a great 'ambassador' for the team - easy to sniff at that sort of stuff but during Covid especially it must have been fucking hard to remain as professional as he did at all times.

The right time to stop being captain. Maybe he'd have gone earlier if there was an heir apparent - the best captain of my lifetime (Hussain) could do that because Michael Vaughan was ready. There's nobody ready now, and we'll probably have to go for a short term "do it for the summer and we'll see" type appointment - to be honest England could do with a bit of picking for the now and not just constantly planning "for" the next ashes.

I hope he plays on for many years as a specialist bat and scores a ton of runs.
I share your rating of Hussain's captaincy.  He never quite had the quality of squad that Vaughan came to enjoy.  I don't think anyone could say that Root has been blessed in that regard either.  What Hussain did bring to the table was a results-based outlook that applied to EVERY match and series - well beyond the Ashes clashes.  

Start to have success in tours of the likes of Pakistan - or these days, the Windies - and you may find the time comes when you have a squad ready for the flashier series.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Saturday, April 16, 2022, 12:14:08
Surely they have to pick a captain for the long term.
I’ve seen Stokes & Broad mentioned but can’t see the point in either of those.
Stokes really doesn’t need the extra attention or hassle.
Broad is too close to the end of his career.

If they are going to pick an older player for a few years then maybe Bairstow, or maybe they can go for a non playing captain


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JBZ on Saturday, April 16, 2022, 12:18:45
Bring in someone who is currently outside of the England set up.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, April 16, 2022, 17:28:50
Bring in someone who is currently outside of the England set up.
Its a Brierley moment for England again.

We need a complete shake up. Stokes or Broad would be a case of 'more of the same', but who to go for? Potentially Sam Billings as a specialist wicket keeper/captain? Or James Vince, who isn't really good enough? Eoin Morgan is too old, his back wouldn't last and he's not good enough for Test cricket.

Difficult one.



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, April 17, 2022, 11:11:02
Its a Brierley moment for England again.

We need a complete shake up. Stokes or Broad would be a case of 'more of the same', but who to go for? Potentially Sam Billings as a specialist wicket keeper/captain? Or James Vince, who isn't really good enough? Eoin Morgan is too old, his back wouldn't last and he's not good enough for Test cricket.

Difficult one.



Stop all the Test matches and focus on making the County league teams stronger with young English talent which will reap the rewards later on.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, June 4, 2022, 13:58:25
Difficult to win a game of cricket if you can't stop the ball from hitting your stumps!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, June 4, 2022, 15:59:14
I've given up opening the cricket thread as it's always bad news😀


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, June 4, 2022, 16:09:25
Well, England are doing a little better now, albeit Stokes had quite the let off being bowled off a no ball. It's the same old story though - Root and Stokes can bat, Broad and Anderson can bowl and the other 7 are a serious problem. Potts looks decent, similar player to Broad though. Probably more a long term replacement than a third seamer.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, June 4, 2022, 16:18:43
I think Potts has done enough to get another game

I have seen Harry Brook one. He looks technically flawed. But he is the guy in form and has scored shed loads! Why Pope is ahead of him I don't know

Crawley did the same as always

Lee's deserves another game


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, June 4, 2022, 16:33:52
Stokes falls. Will more than likely be game over now.

I like the look of Potts. Should have a future ahead of him


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, June 4, 2022, 16:38:12
Apparently it's a one day game.

Dancing down the pitch and trying to flick it over the keepers head.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, June 4, 2022, 18:33:10
Surprised to be proven wrong. We are favourites now, no excuses. Just go out there tomorrow and win a game of test cricket for once in your lives


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, June 4, 2022, 19:05:42
The weather forecast isn't the best tomorrow


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Saturday, June 4, 2022, 19:14:42
Frustrating the day ended when it did. We were strolling to victory there.

Their bowlers now have a night to rest up. If they get Root in the first few overs it's game on again.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, June 4, 2022, 19:17:57
Frustrating the day ended when it did. We were strolling to victory there.

Their bowlers now have a night to rest up. If they get Root in the first few overs it's game on again.
More like 'game over' if Root is out


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, June 4, 2022, 19:18:39
61 to go. To be honest, I wouldn't trust our bottom four to get more than about 20 so it still feels very evenly balanced.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Saxondale on Saturday, June 4, 2022, 22:15:06
Went to Lords today.  First time. 

At about 4 o clock yesterday I wasnt sure we were going to be  getting any play today so it was a real bonus and a very enjoyable day. 



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Sunday, June 5, 2022, 10:27:20
This is too easy. What's happened to England?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Sunday, June 5, 2022, 10:50:59
Blimey, England won a test match


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, June 5, 2022, 10:56:49
Cracking chase, excellent result. England remind me a bit of the West Indies in the late 90s early 2000s when they still had Walsh and Ambrose and Lara and Chanderpaul were brilliant but the other players weren't at the same level.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, June 5, 2022, 11:01:03
Cracking result England. Only downside to the second innings really is how cheaply Stokes chucked his wicket away. Other than that, fantastic, and Root well supported by Foakes too which must have been as nice a surprise for him as it was for us!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, June 5, 2022, 11:03:08
Cracking result England. Only downside to the second innings really is how cheaply Stokes chucked his wicket away. Other than that, fantastic, and Root well supported by Foakes too which must have been as nice a surprise for him as it was for us!

I know Stokes getting out was disappointing but think his innings changed the game - totally spooked Williamson into not bowling his spinner which meant his three main seamers were overbowled and got tired.

Some amusement in finding a captain worse at captaining spinners than Root mind.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Robinz on Sunday, June 5, 2022, 11:06:03
Wonderful result.... Yes


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: kerslakeisgod on Sunday, June 5, 2022, 11:39:39
Yes, just left Lords, Root was masterclass.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: horlock07 on Monday, June 6, 2022, 09:11:18
Just a quickie, was quite the cricket fan in the 80's and early 90's but drifted away after that.

From looking at it from the periphery, there seem to be loads of tests not lasting 5 days nowadays, is this just that England are crap, or is it that pitches are favouring bowlers much more than they used to, or just bowling is generally better?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, June 6, 2022, 09:46:18
Just a quickie, was quite the cricket fan in the 80's and early 90's but drifted away after that.

From looking at it from the periphery, there seem to be loads of tests not lasting 5 days nowadays, is this just that England are crap, or is it that pitches are favouring bowlers much more than they used to, or just bowling is generally better?

Bit of a few things I think.

Scoring rates are higher so the game moves on faster - lots of the 'blame' for this gets given to T20 but Ponting's all conquering Aussies really started it.

Bowling is definitely better - not neccessarily the very best bowlers but the general standard.

Stats/data analysis has played a big role - batters with technical flaws or weaknesses get caught out very quickly now as people have access to videos of every dismissal they ever have. Before you used to see a batter maybe once every few years when they'd tour England, and couldn't do that much prep for newer players.

For one reason or another, a lot of the best teams in the world at the moment are stronger bowling units than batting - certainly Eng, SA, NZ and Aus. Maybe India and Pakistan have a case for being reasonably even.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Monday, June 6, 2022, 10:08:14
As you say it was Australia that changed the game to be more aggressive and score runs quickly to try and make sure that a result was possible.

None the less the pitches have also been a factor, look at the West Indies in the winter, lifeless flat pitches and two fairly dull test matches.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Monday, June 6, 2022, 11:55:56
Test cricket is better when the bowlers have the edge.

Nobody wants to see teams declaring on 550 runs and a draw being inevitable.

The way the game vs NZ swung back and forth is exactly how it should be.



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, June 11, 2022, 15:48:57
Nobody wants to see teams declaring on 550 runs and a draw being inevitable.

Being bowled out on 553 isn't ideal either... think I'd take a draw from here.

Root dropping Mitchell ended up costing 187. He's about the only England bat who might actually make that back though...


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Sunday, June 12, 2022, 12:47:18
Pope 100. Fair play.

When the other team scores 550 though, it makes it hard for me to get excited. Are people getting high scores because they're actually good at cricket or just because the pitch is dead? I'm going to guess the latter.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Sunday, June 12, 2022, 13:12:20
Pope 100. Fair play.

When the other team scores 550 though, it makes it hard for me to get excited. Are people getting high scores because they're actually good at cricket or just because the pitch is dead? I'm going to guess the latter.

You might be right, but we’ve managed to get bowled out and lose games in those circumstances before


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, June 12, 2022, 13:47:33
Pope 100. Fair play.

When the other team scores 550 though, it makes it hard for me to get excited. Are people getting high scores because they're actually good at cricket or just because the pitch is dead? I'm going to guess the latter.

Both sides have dropped a lot of chances, I think the pitch is decent for batting but it's really not a road. Some good batting but mostly poor fielding. The key thing for the scores is that the outfield is absolutely lightning - as seen in the scoring rates in both innings. Been up near 4 both innings, if that's nearer 4 we probably see 450 or so playing 200/2 and consider this to be nicely poised.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 14, 2022, 13:51:48
200 to win in about four hours, Stokes and Bairstow in. This is going to be a lot of fun if we make it...


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Tuesday, June 14, 2022, 14:09:12
200 to win in about four hours, Stokes and Bairstow in. This is going to be a lot of fun if we make it...
Can't see it. Having to take a lot of risks already.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Saxondale on Tuesday, June 14, 2022, 15:09:20
Um.  Bairstow is making it look possible.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 14, 2022, 15:14:14
120 runs in 14.4 overs.

Told you it'd be fun!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Saxondale on Tuesday, June 14, 2022, 15:25:37
2nd fastest 100 from an Englishman.



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 14, 2022, 15:27:13
2nd fastest 100 from an Englishman.

Absolutely remarkable that the one faster innings was in 1902. 1902!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: ChalkyWhiteIsGod on Tuesday, June 14, 2022, 15:32:25
Should be in the bag this. Enough time, just need to not drop wickets.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: ChalkyWhiteIsGod on Tuesday, June 14, 2022, 15:38:38
Without trying to jinx anything. What is the record for most amount of runs scored in a 1st innings to then lose the test? 553 is a colossal first innings to then lose.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 14, 2022, 15:48:31
Without trying to jinx anything. What is the record for most amount of runs scored in a 1st innings to then lose the test? 553 is a colossal first innings to then lose.

595 for Bangladesh against NZ in 2017. This would be fifth on the list. Highest in, or involving England though.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 14, 2022, 16:07:16
Nobody wants to see teams declaring on 550 runs and a draw being inevitable.

Tehehee.

What a silly game. Wonderful, but deeply silly.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Tuesday, June 14, 2022, 17:34:12
Wow! Shocked.

Buffet bowling to Bairstow. If they'd just tried to get him out, they probably would have!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Tuesday, June 14, 2022, 18:29:23
Missed it all. Walked through the door just after we scored the winning runs!

I'd of been interested to see the odds of England winning after NZ's first innings!

The fact we did it with over 20 overs to spare too. Bonkers stuff.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, June 25, 2022, 13:01:26
Knife edge stuff this. The form that Bairstowey is in anything around the 200-250 mark to chase is do-able.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Saturday, June 25, 2022, 13:01:59
Knife edge stuff this. The form that Bairstowey is in anything around the 200-250 mark to chase is do-able.

I’d be happy chasing 300-350.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, June 25, 2022, 13:04:22
I’d be happy chasing 300-350.

It would certainly be exciting!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, June 26, 2022, 16:37:46
Feeling good about this. Rooty is due a score and we’ve got the most in-form batsman in the entire world ever still to come in Bairstowey


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, June 26, 2022, 16:42:07
Just accidentally watched some of yesterday’s highlights and I have to say Vaughan’s commentary regarding Stokes’ dismissal was embarrassing. You could hear the co-commentator (Agnew?) trying to reel him in but he just kept going.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nick Bamosomi on Monday, June 27, 2022, 08:45:51
Just accidentally watched some of yesterday’s highlights and I have to say Vaughan’s commentary regarding Stokes’ dismissal was embarrassing. You could hear the co-commentator (Agnew?) trying to reel him in but he just kept going.

Can you elaborate? What did Vaughan say?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Monday, June 27, 2022, 13:34:50
Can you elaborate? What did Vaughan say?

Along the lines of ‘that’s absolute rubbish from Stokes’ (which it was) but it was the tone that got under my skin. He almost sounded gleeful and it felt like there was a bit of nastiness to it. I felt that the co-commentator didn’t take kindly to it either.

Absolutely stunning result today, again. First team to chase 250+ in three consecutive tests. All played in great spirit too, clearly a lot of mutual respect out there between the two teams. Good to feel proud of the England test team again


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Monday, June 27, 2022, 13:51:31
I'm surprised NZ are the 'best team in the world'.

I still think England's batting line up is frail. I also don't think they bowl that well. Anderson and Broad are still coming to the end of their careers. Potts looked a prospect. Leach got lots of wickets through bowling straight balls!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Monday, June 27, 2022, 15:11:25
I'm surprised NZ are the 'best team in the world'.

I still think England's batting line up is frail. I also don't think they bowl that well. Anderson and Broad are still coming to the end of their careers. Potts looked a prospect. Leach got lots of wickets through bowling straight balls!

I agree, but we still seem to have made some strides. Form like Bairstow’s only comes round every so often but Pope, Lees and Foakes have all made some worthwhile contributions, and there’s always the chance of Broad swashbuckling his way to a 50 (although like you said, he’s in his twilight). Oh also Overton. There’s some promising signs if nothing else.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nick Bamosomi on Monday, June 27, 2022, 16:41:25
Along the lines of ‘that’s absolute rubbish from Stokes’ (which it was) but it was the tone that got under my skin. He almost sounded gleeful and it felt like there was a bit of nastiness to it. I felt that the co-commentator didn’t take kindly to it either.

Absolutely stunning result today, again. First team to chase 250+ in three consecutive tests. All played in great spirit too, clearly a lot of mutual respect out there between the two teams. Good to feel proud of the England test team again

Thanks. I’m on holiday, so haven’t been able to watch any of this test.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, June 27, 2022, 16:47:33
Vaughan has always had gobshite tendencies and has seemed to be even worse since TMS jettisoned Boycott, presumably trying to fill the "professional Yorkshire misery" role. Certainly not one I'm ever pleased to hear on commentary.

And that's leaving aside the Yorkshire racism stuff, which is not great at all.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Monday, June 27, 2022, 18:45:28
Thanks. I’m on holiday, so haven’t been able to watch any of this test.

You’ve missed one for the ages, I’m sorry to report!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Monday, June 27, 2022, 20:38:16
Vaughan has always had gobshite tendencies and has seemed to be even worse since TMS jettisoned Boycott, presumably trying to fill the "professional Yorkshire misery" role. Certainly not one I'm ever pleased to hear on commentary.

And that's leaving aside the Yorkshire racism stuff, which is not great at all.
.

He's only an adopted Yorkshireman. He's from Eccles originally.

He is however a test of the first order and it's a shame TMS continue to use him considering his history.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, July 3, 2022, 15:05:04
Bloody hell Bairstow. This is frightening form


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JBZ on Sunday, July 3, 2022, 21:38:16
Saw someone with an STFC T shirt at the county ground this evening.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Monday, July 4, 2022, 14:18:53
Saw someone with an STFC T shirt at the county ground this evening.

If some asked me where I was most likely to see someone in a Town shirt, I think the County Ground would be top of the list....


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Monday, July 4, 2022, 15:31:09
If some asked me where I was most likely to see someone in a Town shirt, I think the County Ground would be top of the list....

Still trying to figure that comment out myself.

England actually stand a chance here, given their recent history. India blowing reviews left right and centre can’t hurt. Apparently Root has had 6 lbw reviews against him this summer and none of them have been successful. Just shows how desperate teams are to get him out. This will be another fun run chase one way or the other!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Monday, July 4, 2022, 15:44:22
Next two wickets will be key.

If any combination of Root/Bairstow/Stokes can bat for any length of time England have a decent chance.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: horlock07 on Monday, July 4, 2022, 16:00:26
If some asked me where I was most likely to see someone in a Town shirt, I think the County Ground would be top of the list....

Still trying to figure that comment out myself.

I read it as likley being at one of the plethora of cricket County Grounds, so Taunton perhaps?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JBZ on Monday, July 4, 2022, 16:20:04
Somerset v Surrey yesterday evening.

Posted in the cricket thread.

Don't see many wearing STFC apparel in Taunton Deane.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Monday, July 4, 2022, 16:48:23
Somerset v Surrey yesterday evening.

Posted in the cricket thread.

Don't see many wearing STFC apparel in Taunton Deane.

Wasn’t Vic Morgan was it, he was there with a friend of mine


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Monday, July 4, 2022, 17:02:09
Somerset v Surrey yesterday evening.

Posted in the cricket thread.

Don't see many wearing STFC apparel in Taunton Deane.

👍

Rooty passes 50 and Bairstowy is ticking along nicely too (yet another 50!) Ninth biggest run chase in test history in the offing? Bairstowy and Rooty certainly seem to think so


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Boy About Town on Monday, July 4, 2022, 17:35:30
👍

Rooty passes 50 and Bairstowy is ticking along nicely too (yet another 50!) Ninth biggest run chase in test history in the offing? Bairstowy and Rooty certainly seem to think so

It’s gonna happen. Bazzball is something else.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JBZ on Monday, July 4, 2022, 17:49:45
Wasn’t Vic Morgan was it, he was there with a friend of mine

Didn't see him, no.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Monday, July 4, 2022, 22:18:01
👍

Rooty passes 50 and Bairstowy is ticking along nicely too (yet another 50!) Ninth biggest run chase in test history in the offing? Bairstowy and Rooty certainly seem to think so

The players don't even seem that surprised by it. Crawley seemed to be saying that once the bowlers did their job the team were perfectly happy with the total they were chasing.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Monday, July 4, 2022, 23:01:23
The players don't even seem that surprised by it. Crawley seemed to be saying that once the bowlers did their job the team were perfectly happy with the total they were chasing.

Even if England fail to chase this total (and I think it’s ok to say we are now favourites to do so) it’s certainly refreshing to see this level of confidence running through the team. The real pudding will be if we can take this newfound confidence overseas


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, July 5, 2022, 06:48:25
It's properly mind blowing. It's like Kevin Keegan's "we'll just score more goals than they do" philosophy not only worked, but led to teams scoring 6-8 goals a game regularly. Can't help feeling it'll come very unstuck on spicier pitches, but it's an enormous amount of fun right now.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Tuesday, July 5, 2022, 09:42:24
Perfect start. These two are in cruise control at the moment


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, July 5, 2022, 09:58:17
Root with his hundred


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Kinky Tom on Tuesday, July 5, 2022, 09:59:44
So easy too.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, July 5, 2022, 10:03:02
Honestly it's like watching a different sport. Chases of ~300 in the final innings are like, 10-20% chances. We're going to do four in a row, all of them at an absolute canter.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, July 5, 2022, 10:38:25
Bairstow with the century.

n.n.n.n.nineteen to go

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3bl4xaFZMM


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, July 5, 2022, 10:39:58
7 to go. 12 scored in 90 seconds!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, July 5, 2022, 10:43:02
Ridiculous sport.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, July 5, 2022, 10:43:03
Boom! What a final innings pairing


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: ChalkyWhiteIsGod on Tuesday, July 5, 2022, 10:52:21
I looked at this the other day and thought best we could hope for was a draw. Gobsmacked to see we won.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Tuesday, July 5, 2022, 12:13:39
Can scarcely believe that. They’d have chased down 500 if they had to today. Really astonishing performance


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Boy About Town on Tuesday, July 5, 2022, 12:30:43
A sensational transformation. As previously said; we need to see what this team can do abroad. I very much fancy us to win the next Ashes.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Crispy on Tuesday, July 5, 2022, 12:38:05
Massive one Friday, Potterne (A) in the wallop. Plucky underdogs vs the Gaiger's machine. Letsby Avenue. 


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: ChalkyWhiteIsGod on Tuesday, July 5, 2022, 12:40:46
Why was this 5th test postponed to this year from last, covid outbreak?

T20 finals day next Saturday. Went to one before, think it was 2014. Good laugh.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Tuesday, July 5, 2022, 12:49:06
Why was this 5th test postponed to this year from last, covid outbreak?

T20 finals day next Saturday. Went to one before, think it was 2014. Good laugh.

Yup, in the India camp, couldn’t field a team


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Tuesday, July 5, 2022, 21:06:34
Yup, in the India camp, couldn’t field a team

That's a very generous interpretation of what happened. Actually the whole team delivered negative tests in the week prior to the test. The only person that tested positive was the physio. However the game was within a couple of weeks of the restart of the IPL, and a load of the squad got scared they'd miss a big pay day and refused to play and fucked off home.



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Boy About Town on Tuesday, July 5, 2022, 21:11:26
That's a very generous interpretation of what happened. Actually the whole team delivered negative tests in the week prior to the test. The only person that tested positive was the physio. However the game was within a couple of weeks of the restart of the IPL, and a load of the squad got scared they'd miss a big pay day and refused to play and fucked off home.



Yes. I was under the impression it was down to the IPL. India should have been punished. That said they were yesterday…


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Tuesday, July 5, 2022, 21:20:56
That's a very generous interpretation of what happened. Actually the whole team delivered negative tests in the week prior to the test. The only person that tested positive was the physio. However the game was within a couple of weeks of the restart of the IPL, and a load of the squad got scared they'd miss a big pay day and refused to play and fucked off home.



Oh, I didn’t read past the headline after googling it. Well that’s bullshit and they should have lost the test by default. Money talks, no integrity


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, July 6, 2022, 09:57:25
A sensational transformation. As previously said; we need to see what this team can do abroad. I very much fancy us to win the next Ashes.

That's quite some statement considering the abject performance just 6 months ago!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Boy About Town on Wednesday, July 6, 2022, 11:45:22
That's quite some statement considering the abject performance just 6 months ago!

This team have a lot more than we had. It’s a home series next year. I think we will demolish them.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JBZ on Wednesday, July 6, 2022, 19:54:56
Looking forward to Saturday night

_______________

Is it June or late September
Is it 1993
Could you help me to remember
Is this how I'm supposed to be

Sometimes I think the pain blows my mind
Pain blows my mind.

Did you ever get those cigarettes
And did you get anything for me
Will you help me to remember
When I fall into the sea.

Sometimes I think the pain blows my mind
Pain blows my mind.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JBZ on Saturday, July 9, 2022, 21:36:35
Superb record breaking night at the County Ground


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 10, 2022, 06:35:02
Superb record breaking night at the County Ground

It was amazing to watch on TV. Must have been superb in the ground, even if you were in a bit of danger from the ball being repeatedly walloped in your direction.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JBZ on Sunday, July 10, 2022, 14:32:27
It was amazing to watch on TV. Must have been superb in the ground, even if you were in a bit of danger from the ball being repeatedly walloped in your direction.

The County Ground is made for 20 over cricket.

Rossouw has been a great signing.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Boy About Town on Sunday, July 10, 2022, 17:06:34
Superb record breaking night at the County Ground

The screening of Mama Mia?  :soapy tit wank:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JBZ on Saturday, July 16, 2022, 12:44:33
Gotta love T20 finals day.  Hopefully, SCCC go one better this year.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 16, 2022, 14:02:42
Gotta love T20 finals day.  Hopefully, SCCC go one better this year.

Fingers crossed. Think the bowling attack looks a bit weak, but the batting could chase anything..


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 16, 2022, 16:02:38
Fingers crossed. Think the bowling attack looks a bit weak, but the batting could chase anything..

Perhaps not.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JBZ on Saturday, July 16, 2022, 16:11:19
Disappointing but the RLC is up next


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Boy About Town on Saturday, July 16, 2022, 21:11:23
Hampshire did well in the final


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Sunday, July 17, 2022, 20:51:26
England lost the t20 and 1 day series at home to India.

Feeling the loss of Morgans captaincy? or India just better?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, July 17, 2022, 21:50:43
England lost the t20 and 1 day series at home to India.

Feeling the loss of Morgans captaincy? or India just better?
India have some bowlers who can take wickets.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Friday, August 19, 2022, 15:05:35
Guess who had tickets for day 4  :bye:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Friday, August 19, 2022, 15:09:37
Is Lindsey in charge?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, August 24, 2022, 18:00:02
In the grand tradition of English test cricket, we've reacted to a shit batting performance by dropping a bowler - Potts out, Robinson in. Crawley clings on.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Wednesday, August 24, 2022, 18:28:56
In the grand tradition of English test cricket, we've reacted to a shit batting performance by dropping a bowler - Potts out, Robinson in. Crawley clings on.

In all fairness, Robinson gives us more with the bat than Potts does


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, August 24, 2022, 20:10:44
Averages 9 in tests and 19 first class, he probably is better than Potts but not by a great deal. He's not like bringing in Wales (he's injured) who genuinely does outperform our batters most of the time!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, August 25, 2022, 15:00:27
Well, that went well. South Africa always looked to have quite the tail, especially without Jansen. Now to see if England can improve on their last couple of efforts.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Thursday, August 25, 2022, 15:44:51
Off to SA in February, would have liked to see one of the matches but sadly the only one still to play is an ODI at Centurian which is on the the other side of the country from where we will be staying, just my luck.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Saxondale on Thursday, August 25, 2022, 21:33:03
Ive got tickets for day 3 on Saturday so Im hoping it goes that far!

If not as we're up there it'll be off to Stockport.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, August 26, 2022, 10:15:02
This Nortje fella is very, very handy. 91mph reverse swing. Good luck lads.

Rabada up the other end isn't half bad either.

Both these sides are 5x better at bowling than batting, so you might well see the end of it on Day 3!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Friday, August 26, 2022, 10:38:54
This Nortje fella is very, very handy. 91mph reverse swing. Good luck lads.

Rabada up the other end isn't half bad either.

Both these sides are 5x better at bowling than batting, so you might well see the end of it on Day 3!

Their bowling has improved a great deal since our last tour down there. Rabada and Nortje from memory were made to look very ordinary, now look ideal for English conditions


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, November 5, 2022, 10:39:50
England making very hard work of this. Fuck sake


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Saturday, November 5, 2022, 10:47:32
England making very hard work of this. Fuck sake

Did you expect anything less? We always do.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, November 5, 2022, 10:53:56
It looks a tight finish looking at BBC website.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, November 5, 2022, 10:57:18
Did you expect anything less? We always do.

Its good fun. 3 needed from 5.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Kinky Tom on Saturday, November 5, 2022, 10:58:06
Won it.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, November 5, 2022, 10:58:30
Woakes. Phew


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, November 5, 2022, 10:59:42
Easy🤣


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, November 5, 2022, 11:00:36
Ravi Bopara just said that was comfortable! What a cucumber


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Saturday, November 5, 2022, 11:04:48
No-one better under pressure than Ben Stokes, regardless of the format.
What a man.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, November 5, 2022, 11:06:21
No-one better under pressure than Ben Stokes, regardless of the format.
What a man.

He is absolutely brilliant


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, November 5, 2022, 11:08:26
It always amazes me how often it comes down to the last few balls of the last over.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, November 5, 2022, 11:17:43
Never in doubt.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Saturday, November 5, 2022, 12:24:18
Never in doubt.

No, England just trying to make it exciting 😉


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Thursday, November 10, 2022, 07:45:13
Quick wicket for England. India 9-1


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, November 10, 2022, 08:35:17
Quick wicket for England. India 9-1

Going well so far, not absolutely delighted to see the spinners doing well...


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Thursday, November 10, 2022, 09:36:03
Good start from England chasing 169


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Thursday, November 10, 2022, 10:28:30
Piece of piss, this!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Thursday, November 10, 2022, 10:30:55
Is there a fire drill...


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, November 10, 2022, 10:37:14
Well this has gone unusually well.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Kinky Tom on Thursday, November 10, 2022, 10:38:56
Walk in the park.  Unfortunately I'll be heading to Heathrow during the final, bugger.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Thursday, November 10, 2022, 10:41:04
A joy to watch that.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, November 10, 2022, 10:47:17
Walk in the park.  Unfortunately I'll be heading to Heathrow during the final, bugger.

Forecast is pretty grim, so might be reserve day on Monday... when the forecast is also grim.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Thursday, November 10, 2022, 10:50:08
Holy Mackerel Batman, that was some performance. Absolutely blew them away


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Thursday, November 10, 2022, 11:09:02
On it right from start of batting and never let up


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: ChalkyWhiteIsGod on Thursday, November 10, 2022, 12:13:15
Forecast is pretty grim, so might be reserve day on Monday... when the forecast is also grim.

Jesus forecast is horrendous for the foreseeable future in Melbourne. What the hell happens if its wash out after washout?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: oxonrobin on Thursday, November 10, 2022, 19:43:32
Anyone know of any decent watchable highlights?

All the YouTube offerings are very amateurish.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Thursday, November 10, 2022, 19:51:41
About as good as it gets

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6Kmvoyww-lU


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, November 10, 2022, 20:12:15
BBC Sport has highlights


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: oxonrobin on Thursday, November 10, 2022, 21:13:00
About as good as it gets

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6Kmvoyww-lU

Excellent, thanks


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Thursday, November 10, 2022, 22:10:13
Excellent, thanks


My pleasure😀


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Sunday, November 13, 2022, 07:34:30
Barmy army, barmy army, barmy army, come on England.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, November 13, 2022, 09:48:32
Rain on the way. I think I’m right in saying it goes Duckworth Lewis if England get to ten overs.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Sunday, November 13, 2022, 10:04:05
eek.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, November 13, 2022, 10:18:32
From the bbc:

DLS par at this stage is 50. It's not raining.

England on top


Title: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Sunday, November 13, 2022, 10:27:27
10 overs - DL now in play if we can't finish.
approx 6 an over required


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, November 13, 2022, 10:29:42
And England still nicely ahead of par


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, November 13, 2022, 10:40:56
Brook gone having contributed a useful 20


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, November 13, 2022, 11:03:21
On a charge. England huge favourites now


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, November 13, 2022, 11:13:33
Done!

England first team to hold both world cups at the same time. Absolutely awesome, well done England!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Sunday, November 13, 2022, 11:17:26
cometh the hour, cometh the Stokes


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, November 13, 2022, 11:28:20
cometh the hour, cometh the Stokes

Every time. Surely one of England's greatest one day players


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, November 13, 2022, 11:30:21
Excellent and a fantastic achievement :clap: now let's get the test team sorted.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Sunday, November 13, 2022, 11:53:21
Every time. Surely one of England's greatest one day players

Greatest players full stop - his test innings haven’t been bad either!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, November 13, 2022, 11:55:16
Greatest players full stop - his test innings haven’t been bad either!

His overall record is actually really not all that in any format, but he's just the absolute man for a final or a clutch moment. He's Didier Drogba, rather than Cristiano Ronaldo. And I love him for that.

What a game, feel hugely for Shaheen getting injured there because that was going to the wire.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, November 13, 2022, 12:02:17
Greatest players full stop - his test innings haven’t been bad either!

Agreed. Just one of those rare sportsmen who seem to love the pressure.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Steak supper on Sunday, November 13, 2022, 12:11:34
Stokes is very good & time will tell where he fits in with the greats

There is always a bit of recency bias when looking at current players


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, November 13, 2022, 16:04:26
Stokes is very good & time will tell where he fits in with the greats

There is always a bit of recency bias when looking at current players

This is just my opinion, but I think greatness should be defined by what you’ve achieved, not how ‘technically’ good you are. I’d say Stokes has already achieved greatness just on the back of his exploits three years ago and this morning. A bit like how Muhammad Ali is the ‘greatest’ despite not being the ‘best’. Know what I mean?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Robinz on Sunday, November 13, 2022, 19:19:26
Simply wonderful sporting fixtures this weekend in this of the World with differing results.
Firstly the womans Rugby world cup final. Totally fantastic played with great skill and was wonderful and an example of how sport was meant to be played.
Then followed 24 hours later by a superb game of 20 over cricket.
The result of both games could have gone either way
Credit to all players and everyone involved
Wonderful entertainment.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: ChalkyWhiteIsGod on Sunday, November 13, 2022, 19:39:03
This is just my opinion, but I think greatness should be defined by what you’ve achieved, not how ‘technically’ good you are. I’d say Stokes has already achieved greatness just on the back of his exploits three years ago and this morning. A bit like how Muhammad Ali is the ‘greatest’ despite not being the ‘best’. Know what I mean?

A lot fairer argument in a one vs one sport than it is in a team one though.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RedRag on Tuesday, November 15, 2022, 19:05:30
Pitch might have been a bit two paced but restricting Pakistan to 137 is what actually won that Final, imo.  Take a bow Adil Rashid and Sam Curran.  3-12 off 4 in a 20:20, just wow.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Thursday, December 1, 2022, 09:09:33
England absolutely smashing the hell out of the ball at the moment. Second fastest team to reach 300 in tests apparently.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: horlock07 on Thursday, December 1, 2022, 09:39:01
England absolutely smashing the hell out of the ball at the moment. Second fastest team to reach 300 in tests apparently.

I don't follow Cricket that closely these days, but we seem to veer at the moment from brilliant to pretty crap.

Looking at this and the score so far, if they get a wriggle on after tea they could declare and have a few overs at the other side before the close, albeit I assume its a very batting friendly pitch.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, December 1, 2022, 10:22:08
This is remarkable stuff. At the moment it feels rather like McCullum has just... broken test cricket. It's like a football manager had come in and suddenly every game was 10-6 or 9-2 or something, win or loss, just completely out of the pattern of 150+ years of historic cricket scoring patterns.

England are going to score 500 in a day if light doesn't bring an early close here. Maybe even if it does! It's absolutely remarkable.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Thursday, December 1, 2022, 10:49:17
As friendly as I'm sure the pitch is, and as poor as I'm sure the Pakistani bowlers have been, this is still an absolutely batshit innings so far. This test team are going places.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: ChalkyWhiteIsGod on Thursday, December 1, 2022, 10:53:07
Whats up with the pitch here? Doesn't a bad pitch usually mean more difficult to bat on?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Thursday, December 1, 2022, 10:55:27
Whats up with the pitch here? Doesn't a bad pitch usually mean more difficult to bat on?

I think in the common cricket parlance (and I could be wrong) you'd say a 'bad pitch' is one that offers too much to either the bowlers or the batters. The score here would suggest that this is a 'bad pitch' because its too flat, massively favoring batting over bowling. Can't know for sure though as I've only been following the updates rather than watching.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, December 1, 2022, 11:09:09
England have had three of their nine fastest test centuries ever *today*

Bloody Nora.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: horlock07 on Thursday, December 1, 2022, 11:16:08
I can't see any suggestion in the updates that the bowling has been that bad so assume its just a flat pitch with favourable atmospheric conditions for batting as well.

I see that Stokes has/had 34 off 15 balls!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Thursday, December 1, 2022, 11:20:34
That was absolutely superb to watch. It may not be the traditional way to play a Test Match, but it’s so entertaining to watch.
We will get hammered at some point, but I’m definitely enjoying the new England.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, December 1, 2022, 11:21:04
The bowling has been a bit loose, but not terrible. The fielding has been quite poor, but the outfield is lighting fast, the pitch is flat and England have had an absolute stormer.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Thursday, December 1, 2022, 11:34:07
Sickness bug in the camp beforehand apparently, such that the start time was in doubt.
England definitely still had the runs.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: ChalkyWhiteIsGod on Thursday, December 1, 2022, 11:47:38
Danger of this heading towards a draw then. Bat out as much as you can tomorrow and hope to force a follow on. If Pakistan avoid the follow on that is when it may be in trouble for a draw.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, December 4, 2022, 10:35:41
England might just win this. Very ballsy declaration, very un England (until recently). If we somehow skittle them it’ll be a remarkable win on a pitch such as this


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, December 4, 2022, 10:43:05
Our bowling has become increasingly innovative too. TMS saying England are bowling shorter than has ever been recorded in a test match, and already yielded two wickets. What’s the betting the next wicket comes from a Yorker?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Monday, December 5, 2022, 11:15:14
Jesus fucking Christ. Absolutely unbelievable win


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, December 5, 2022, 11:15:28
What a finish that was. How have England rustled up a cracking game on that absolute shit tip of a pitch? It wasn't turning or doing anything else after tea on Day 5.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Monday, December 5, 2022, 11:16:37
To conjure a win like that from a flat, dead pitch, incredible.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Monday, December 5, 2022, 11:21:22
For a while there that declaration looked to be one level of aggression too far. But the stones on this team is something else, they don't appear to be afraid of anything. Completely changing the way test cricket is played right now, very fun times indeed.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, December 11, 2022, 12:21:28
Just read this on TMS:

More from Mohammad Rizwan on his dismissal by James Anderson:“It was a masterclass, I love him. I had no answer to his question”

Sums up the spirit that this series has been played in. Good stuff, warms my heart


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Monday, December 12, 2022, 08:17:48
This England team is so much fun. Love it


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dphunt88 on Monday, December 12, 2022, 08:38:24
This England team is so much fun. Love it

Fun, absolutely. Even if England had narrowly lost the first and second tests, we'd have still been thoroughly entertained! Which on Pakistan pitches, isn't always the case (see - Pakistan 0-1 Australia series recently).

But the more pertinent point is that England have now won 8 out of 9 test matches under the leadership of Baz McCullum and Ben Stokes - against New Zealand, India, South Africa... and now Pakistan AWAY. An amazing turnaround and so enjoyable to watch.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Monday, December 19, 2022, 11:17:06
England are just taking the piss now. Ridiculous.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Robinz on Monday, December 19, 2022, 18:07:56
Some good performances especially Harry Brooks.
But can't explain the Brisbane test between Australia and South Africa on a green wicket
Over in two days and Edgar feeling if they had got 50 more runs they would have been in with a shout.



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, December 19, 2022, 18:09:44
Hats off to Rehan Ahmed for taking 5 wickets on his debut and giving us hope for many years to come.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Monday, December 19, 2022, 18:23:54
Hats off to Rehan Ahmed for taking 5 wickets on his debut and giving us hope for many years to come.
Did you see the item with Shane Warne watching him in the nets when he was 13 ?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, December 19, 2022, 18:53:38
Did you see the item with Shane Warne watching him in the nets when he was 13 ?

I've only just seen that and amazing that Shane Warne spotted his talent at such a young age.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Monday, December 19, 2022, 20:54:46
I love that Stokes stuck him in to bat at no.3.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Monday, December 19, 2022, 21:56:56
I love that Stokes stuck him in to bat at no.3.
Not sure how I feel about that. Strangest nightwatchman decision ever, the fact that it was his day, or a piss take?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Tuesday, December 20, 2022, 06:36:57
Not sure how I feel about that. Strangest nightwatchman decision ever, the fact that it was his day, or a piss take?

I think Stokes wanted to give him some time at the crease. The game was as good as wrapped up so he knew it didn’t matter if he got out quickly. There was so much batting left that it really didn’t matter that he went for (I think) 10


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: oxonrobin on Tuesday, December 20, 2022, 07:31:45
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=p0hzG6KJ0mE (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=p0hzG6KJ0mE)

This on my feed this morning



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Tuesday, December 20, 2022, 23:33:03
I think Stokes wanted to give him some time at the crease. The game was as good as wrapped up so he knew it didn’t matter if he got out quickly. There was so much batting left that it really didn’t matter that he went for (I think) 10
Could have been a very good bit of man management. Noticed that Ahmed was right in the centre of the post match series win team photo. Making him feel an integral part of the team perhaps?

(https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/onesport/cps/976/cpsprodpb/E0B7/production/_128072575_gettyimages-1450508959-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Wednesday, December 21, 2022, 05:54:48
Could have been a very good bit of man management. Noticed that Ahmed was right in the centre of the post match series win team photo. Making him feel an integral part of the team perhaps?

(https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/onesport/cps/976/cpsprodpb/E0B7/production/_128072575_gettyimages-1450508959-1.jpg)

I reckon so! Gives a good impression to any youngsters in line to be put into the team too. Stoke’s man management and all around persona has been extremely impressive


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Thursday, December 22, 2022, 10:48:23
Could have been a very good bit of man management. Noticed that Ahmed was right in the centre of the post match series win team photo. Making him feel an integral part of the team perhaps?

(https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/onesport/cps/976/cpsprodpb/E0B7/production/_128072575_gettyimages-1450508959-1.jpg)

He was the first player Stokes handed the trophy 🏆 to as well. Clearly making a proper effort to make him feel part of the team.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Thursday, December 22, 2022, 11:01:53
He was the first player Stokes handed the trophy 🏆 to as well. Clearly making a proper effort to make him feel part of the team.

Sums up his vision for the team


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Friday, February 24, 2023, 20:57:18
Do you think Root is looking at Harry Brooks thinking "couldn't you at least wait until I've finished setting England run and century scoring records before you set about destroying them?"

 It's hardly polite is it?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Friday, February 24, 2023, 21:03:37
Do you think Root is looking at Harry Brooks thinking "couldn't you at least wait until I've finished setting England run and century scoring records before you set about destroying them?"

 It's hardly polite is it?

Some player, isn’t he?
Looking forward to tonight’s play, should be an entertaining watch.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, February 24, 2023, 21:05:50
Do you think Root is looking at Harry Brooks thinking "couldn't you at least wait until I've finished setting England run and century scoring records before you set about destroying them?"

 It's hardly polite is it?

Either that or he's thinking 'where the fuck was this guy when I was captaining a bunch of useless fuckers 18 months ago?'

Bloody hell are England fun to watch at the moment.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, February 24, 2023, 21:37:23
Joe Root reverse scooping his fourth ball of the day for six. It's incredible, they've broken a sport that has been broadly the same stylistically for a century or more.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: donkey on Saturday, February 25, 2023, 00:54:05
Joe Root reverse scooping his fourth ball of the day for six. It's incredible, they've broken a sport that has been broadly the same stylistically for a century or more.

Marvellous effort that.  We've reinvented test cricket. 


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: ChalkyWhiteIsGod on Saturday, February 25, 2023, 12:03:10
Joe Root reverse scooping his fourth ball of the day for six. It's incredible, they've broken a sport that has been broadly the same stylistically for a century or more.

That was insane. What a player. What a knock.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Tuesday, February 28, 2023, 14:16:52
Probably the most thrilling test match I’ve ever seen. Definitely should have been a wide at the end, but fair play to the Kiwis. Crazy, crazy stuff.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, June 2, 2023, 13:55:14
To my eye the way Ollie Pope bats and just his presence at the crease, he might as well be Ian Bell


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, June 2, 2023, 14:00:19
To my eye the way Ollie Pope bats and just his presence at the crease, he might as well be Ian Bell

Not sure Ian Bell came out of his crease as much!

Sadly, a game between the second best funded test side in the world and a side that literally can't afford to play red ball cricket is going exactly as you'd expect. 


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, June 2, 2023, 14:13:52
Not sure Ian Bell came out of his crease as much!

Sadly, a game between the second best funded test side in the world and a side that literally can't afford to play red ball cricket is going exactly as you'd expect. 

True! But when he plays the classy, traditional test shots it look so Bell.

Good run out for England despite the inevitable quality of the opposition for the reason you point out. Get back into that aggressive groove


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Friday, June 2, 2023, 18:05:43
True! But when he plays the classy, traditional test shots it look so Bell.

Good run out for England despite the inevitable quality of the opposition for the reason you point out. Get back into that aggressive groove

It's the balls he plays at that Bell would have left that's the difference. Pope's not quite as gung-ho as Duckett, who'll taken a swing at anything that isn't signalled wide, but he still goes after stuff that Bell would have happily watched go passed.

Mind you Bell might have played differently under this set up.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Friday, June 2, 2023, 20:12:31
More interested in Glos vs Surrey at the mo!

Great start by Glos. Throwing it away with their batting. Now a potentially tight finish!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Friday, June 2, 2023, 20:22:11
More interested in Glos vs Surrey at the mo!

Great start by Glos. Throwing it away with their batting. Now a potentially tight finish!

More importantly both Glamorgan and Somerset have won! That's 5 from 5 and max points for Somerset.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Friday, June 2, 2023, 20:41:59
More interested in Glos vs Surrey at the mo!

Great start by Glos. Throwing it away with their batting. Now a potentially tight finish!

Great game.

Got tickets to watched them v Middlesex, Sunday and again v Kent in a couple of weeks.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Friday, June 2, 2023, 22:28:00
More importantly both Glamorgan and Somerset have won! That's 5 from 5 and max points for Somerset.
I don’t follow the minor counties! 😂


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Friday, June 2, 2023, 22:47:34
I don’t follow the minor counties! 😂

Remind me what LV CC Division are Gloucestershire playing in currently? And how many games have they won?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Friday, June 2, 2023, 23:24:32
Remind me what LV CC Division are Gloucestershire playing in currently? And how many games have they won?
They are in the division with the highest number. They have won two.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Saturday, June 3, 2023, 07:44:20
To my eye the way Ollie Pope bats and just his presence at the crease, he might as well be Ian Bell

Slightly more frenetic at the crease than Bell was. Especially early on in his innings, like a cat on a hot tin roof


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Saturday, June 3, 2023, 09:31:15
They are in the division with the highest number. They have won two.

Nah they've won some blast games, they're P5 W0 D4 L1 in the CC. Which to be fair is more reflection of the "wisdom" of organising a red ball league that plays 4 day games and overlaps with a period when a bunch of the most attacking batter s and bowlers are off playing franchise cricket, and the weather's a bit unpredictable. No surprise that 70-80% of games end in draws and league positions are determined currently by the handful of games that reach a conclusion.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Saturday, June 3, 2023, 09:43:44
We’re off to the cricket today, not Lords but Spye Park :)


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Saturday, June 3, 2023, 17:50:01
Ben Stokes - the first winning captain not to bat, bowl or keep wicket in a Test match!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: swindon74 on Sunday, June 4, 2023, 01:15:40
We’re off to the cricket today, not Lords but Spye Park :)

Do they still have a tree in the middle of their pitch?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Sunday, June 4, 2023, 08:17:17
I signed up with Howzat! - the firm that arranges trips for England away tours. They want £8000+ per person for this winters tour of the Windies. Includes tickets for all one-day and T20 games. 21 day tour.

Can’t work out if that’s good value or not.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Sunday, June 4, 2023, 08:19:09
I signed up with Howzat! - the firm that arranges trips for England away tours. They want £8000+ per person for this winters tour of the Windies. Includes tickets for all one-day and T20 games. 21 day tour.

Can’t work out if that’s good value or not.

Did you want to do every game?

There are options to pick and choose a few games if you wanted to do it cheaper.

I’ve been looking through these - https://gulliverstravel.co.uk/event/england-cricket-tour-west-indies


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Sunday, June 4, 2023, 08:51:04
Do they still have a tree in the middle of their pitch?

Yep, have a nice new clubhouse (well not new now but better than the one when I played there in the 80s).


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, June 4, 2023, 21:22:29
Leach out of the Ashes. Shit news, both for him personally and the team as a whole. As far as I know we have absolutely zero spinners who have anything like the experience in the England Test side he does. Joe Root to be our spin attack?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, June 4, 2023, 21:59:54
Leach out of the Ashes. Shit news, both for him personally and the team as a whole. As far as I know we have absolutely zero spinners who have anything like the experience in the England Test side he does. Joe Root to be our spin attack?
Wouldnt be surprised if they ask Moeen Ali to come back for the Ashes. That will cover Leach and also help balance if Stokes can’t bowl.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, June 4, 2023, 22:08:50
Wouldnt be surprised if they ask Moeen Ali to come back for the Ashes. That will cover Leach and also help balance if Stokes can’t bowl.

Good point, didn’t occur to me.

I also forgot about Adil Rashid, who may not have the same level of experience as Leach or Ali but at least has some test pedigree. Also, what was the name of the young mystery spinner we took to New Zealand?

Perhaps it’s not as bleak as I initially thought


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Robinz on Monday, June 5, 2023, 04:35:43
Rehab Ahmed I think you mean. Stokes and McCullum think very highly of him. In fact I think Shane Warne even made comments about his future. But the Ashes  tests are a long way above the standard he has exprrienced


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Monday, June 5, 2023, 07:08:26
Rehab Ahmed I think you mean. Stokes and McCullum think very highly of him. In fact I think Shane Warne even made comments about his future. But the Ashes  tests are a long way above the standard he has exprrienced

Would be worth a punt though for the first test I reckon. Sink or swim


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, June 5, 2023, 07:45:03
Really sad for Leach, man has no luck at all.

No obvious replacement. Rehan would be fun but a risk you break him permanently because the Aussies would absolutely go for him. A Jacks/Dawson would be more safe but I don't think either are better spinners than Joe Root is.

Moeen would be a great story and I love the bloke, but I don't think he's bowled with a red ball for years - Rashid even more so.

Usually hate not playing a spinner, but I think based on the resources available and Stokes having an ongoing knack, I'd go four seamers and spin from Root. From the options available (i.e. I can't drop Crawley!)

Crawley
Duckett
Pope
Root
Brook
Stokes
Bairstow
Robinson
Wood
Broad
Anderson


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Monday, June 5, 2023, 07:59:47
Bloody good team that Nemo.

I’ve been torn whether to go without a spinner, but for the reasons you’ve mentioned I would also go without.
Rashid is injured anyway I believe, and Moeen has been out the test side for too long.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Monday, June 5, 2023, 13:52:20
I signed up with Howzat! - the firm that arranges trips for England away tours. They want £8000+ per person for this winters tour of the Windies. Includes tickets for all one-day and T20 games. 21 day tour.

Can’t work out if that’s good value or not.

Give me Four grand Aud and I'll gladly sort it for you  :pint:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Tuesday, June 6, 2023, 05:23:11
Moeen has had a call from Stokes according to the BBC. Probably the best we can hope for is if he comes back for the Ashes, but I’d still be happy to see Ahmed given a go


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Tuesday, June 6, 2023, 06:10:59
Modem has had a call from Stokes according to the BBC. Probably the best we can hope for is if he comes back for the Ashes, but I’d still be happy to see Ahmed given a go
Must have been VOIP. 😂


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Tuesday, June 6, 2023, 07:03:06
Must have been VOIP. 😂

Whoopsie!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Wednesday, June 7, 2023, 08:12:01
Moeen it is then.

Makes sense, definitely improves our batting line up too.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Wednesday, June 7, 2023, 18:34:22
Moeen it is then.

Makes sense, definitely improves our batting line up too.

I’m all for it. Brings a bit of X Factor too


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Cookie on Thursday, June 8, 2023, 09:30:38
Oz looking ominous in the WTC so far, England will need to bowl better than India have so far. 


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, June 8, 2023, 09:33:28
Oz looking ominous in the WTC so far, England will need to bowl better than India have so far. 

India bowled beautifully for the first hour or so yesterday, but since then they've been... poor. Not picking Ashwin is a strange one, he's just too good to sit out surely?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Cookie on Thursday, June 8, 2023, 10:51:05
India bowled beautifully for the first hour or so yesterday, but since then they've been... poor. Not picking Ashwin is a strange one, he's just too good to sit out surely?

Strange decision for sure, surely everyone wants the ranked number one test bowler in the team. The green pitch affected decision making there I'd guess.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Cookie on Thursday, June 8, 2023, 11:00:46
Some decent progress this morning and it will be interesting if India can bowl Aus out for say 450ish and match it. The weather isn't getting in the way so plenty of time still. I'm firmly team India so I'm happy to see some wickets go this morning but Australia still in control you'd think.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, June 8, 2023, 15:14:29
Everything about this game is giving me the serious heebie jeebies ahead of the Ashes.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Kinky Tom on Thursday, June 8, 2023, 15:20:52
Not watched any of this but going to the first day next Friday, looking forward to it.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: ChalkyWhiteIsGod on Thursday, June 8, 2023, 15:22:03
I'm no cricket expert but India seems a lot better preparation than Ireland.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, June 14, 2023, 09:42:46
Right then, Ashes on Friday. Think both teams are coming into this series stronger than they have in years - Aus have the top three batters in the world rankings (Marnus, Smith, Head) in their middle order, plus four or five excellent seamers. England have a bit less convincing on paper, but keep being brilliant on grass. It could, should be a cracking series.

Predictions? I'm thinking 3-2 Australia, I can't see draws with this England team. Boland to be the star bowler for them, Robinson for us. I think that Aussie middle order are going to score a lot of runs.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Wednesday, June 14, 2023, 09:47:22
To quote a certain TEF member.

Piece of piss - 4.1

Really looking forward to it, I am worried about Bairstows lack of cricket as well as Moeens lack of red ball cricket.
But I just don’t think you can predict anything with this England team.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Saxondale on Wednesday, June 14, 2023, 10:00:12
Should be good.  Got tickets for a day at Headingley and a day at Old Trafford sorted.  Really looking forward to it.

 


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Laddy in Red on Wednesday, June 14, 2023, 11:23:09
3-1 to the Aussies. Their prioritisation of test cricket will pay dividends, especially in contrast to the opposite approach by the ECB.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: swindon74 on Wednesday, June 14, 2023, 14:05:43
It’s still blows my mind, that jimmy is still bowling and playing to this high a standard at 40 years old! It’s remarkable! What a bloke!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Wednesday, June 14, 2023, 14:17:22
3-1 Aussies one rain effected draw.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, June 14, 2023, 20:07:34
I'm going on Sunday.

I predict either a) a rain filled day or b) I'll be getting pissed whilst watching Steve Smith grind out a double century.

I think we'll miss Wood's pace, but understand the difficulty in dropping one of Anderson, Broad or Robinson. Interested to see where Mooen slots into the batting order.

Looking forward to the series, I think it'll be close.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Thursday, June 15, 2023, 15:39:09
Hope Steve Smith still gets plenty of stick😆


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Thursday, June 15, 2023, 18:43:00
Been a very long time since I’ve been this excited about a series of test cricket. No matter what transpires, even if we get trounced, this is all due to Bazball


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, June 16, 2023, 07:50:51
Been a very long time since I’ve been this excited about a series of test cricket. No matter what transpires, even if we get trounced, this is all due to Bazball

I'm usually very excited about the Ashes until about 11:30 AM in the first test! Feels like this one should be more enjoyable and for longer though.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Friday, June 16, 2023, 08:00:53
I'm usually very excited about the Ashes until about 11:30 AM in the first test! Feels like this one should be more enjoyable and for longer though.
What, until we are all out for less than 200 by lunch on the first day? 😂


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Friday, June 16, 2023, 08:30:11
It’s finally here.  :pint:
Got today and Monday off work, so I won’t be moving much over the weekend. Then I’m off to Lords for day 1.

Be interesting to see what Stokes does if he wins the toss, he’s tended to want to chase but the wicket looks very flat.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Friday, June 16, 2023, 09:33:45
England win the toss and choose to bat.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, June 16, 2023, 09:34:21
Interesting considering we've bowled first pretty consistently on every deck under Stokes. First sign of things changing, or is it just mega flat?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Friday, June 16, 2023, 09:46:21
Interesting considering we've bowled first pretty consistently on every deck under Stokes. First sign of things changing, or is it just mega flat?

Sounds like it’s very flat. We will declare before tea on 500+.  ;)


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Friday, June 16, 2023, 09:48:25
Good to see Smith still getting booed


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Friday, June 16, 2023, 09:56:59
When England have bowled first in a couple of Ashes campaigns the first delivery defined the series, and not in a good way for England.
Batting first might not be a bad idea.
Will the top order be able to withstand the pace for the first hour or so.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Friday, June 16, 2023, 10:01:33
First ball cracked away for 4


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Abrahammer on Friday, June 16, 2023, 10:05:01
Good to see Smith still getting booed

He thrives on it, just like Warner


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, June 16, 2023, 10:37:08
Good start


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, June 16, 2023, 10:38:49
https://twitter.com/englandcricket/status/1669618600292777990

For non-Sky customers, you can watch the whole thing for free just 15 minutes behind, which is pretty cool.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Friday, June 16, 2023, 10:49:41
Nathan Lyon gives me Luke Warm vibes


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Friday, June 16, 2023, 11:09:45
Crawley edges one to the keeper and nobody appeals


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, June 16, 2023, 11:11:51
Crawley edges one to the keeper and nobody appeals

Beautiful!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, June 16, 2023, 12:42:14
Australia take that session with the Crawley wicket for me. Great entertainment though. Very deep middle order for England though, and with both Mo and Broad being able to score runs this is very nicely balanced. Come on England!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, June 16, 2023, 13:17:29
Harry Brook has so much talent. I played with a guy who played with him in the age groups and said he was something special about five years ago, but I didn't quite see this coming. Just scores runs so easily.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, June 16, 2023, 13:23:43
He even gets out in remarkable ways.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Friday, June 16, 2023, 13:38:53
Has Stokes hit a score since he’s been captain?
I get how he wants to play etc, but he’s been pretty hopeless with the bat as captain.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: horlock07 on Friday, June 16, 2023, 13:41:18
Right I am going to stop checking the score on the BBC website, literally every time I open the tab we lose a wicket!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, June 16, 2023, 13:41:22
Yeah there's an irony in him being the only player who hasn't improved dramatically under his own captaincy. But it'll come.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Boy About Town on Friday, June 16, 2023, 13:42:44
Wobbling somewhat here..


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Friday, June 16, 2023, 13:43:08
Yeah there's an irony in him being the only player who hasn't improved dramatically under his own captaincy. But it'll come.

Not hitting a score with the bat and injury meaning he can’t bowl as much as he would like isn’t a good look though, is it?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, June 16, 2023, 14:29:16
Root reverse sweeps for four, then tries again with the next ball and gloves it into his pads (given out but Root wins on review), then he reverse sweeps for a four the next ball. Loved that


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ticker45 on Friday, June 16, 2023, 14:59:48
Up to Edgbaston for the fourth day on Monday. Was always in my mind that it might noy get pass the third day with bazball, but Sunday's weather forecast could be mean off-on sessions to prolong it so we shall see.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, June 16, 2023, 15:00:08
And after tea he reverse scoops Boland for six. Lovely stuff.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, June 16, 2023, 15:03:02
And after tea he reverse scoops Boland for six. Lovely stuff.

Work of art when he gets that right. Such a clever shot


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, June 16, 2023, 15:04:59
Work of art when he gets that right. Such a clever shot

Weirdly low risk as well, he does it to the wider ball so he won't get bowled and even if he doesn't catch that cleanly no slip on earth is catching it. Unless there's a third man in, worst case scenario is a dot.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, June 16, 2023, 15:07:15
Weirdly low risk as well, he does it to the wider ball so he won't get bowled and even if he doesn't catch that cleanly no slip on earth is catching it. Unless there's a third man in, worst case scenario is a dot.

Agree. He’s have to REALLY fuck it up to get out, and we are talking about Joe Root so that’s not happening.

Bairstowy and Rooty steadying the ship. Shock


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, June 16, 2023, 15:34:57
Bairstow dropped (would have been a worldie if caught). Then start creaming it around again. I love him


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: horlock07 on Friday, June 16, 2023, 15:43:06
Can somebody give us a score update, as per the earlier message I don't dare look on the BBC!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: river monster on Friday, June 16, 2023, 15:47:37
300-6...


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Friday, June 16, 2023, 15:49:36
Can somebody give us a score update, as per the earlier message I don't dare look on the BBC!

Type in Ashes live score

Currently 310/6  64overs


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, June 16, 2023, 15:51:22
Still need another 150 from this innings for it to be a par/good score methinks


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Boy About Town on Friday, June 16, 2023, 16:18:00
Bazball coming into play. Filthy shots and more coming.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Friday, June 16, 2023, 16:35:37
393/8D

England declared to give themselves 30 minutes bowling at the Aussies and with a new ball to follow.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Friday, June 16, 2023, 16:58:48
England declare on 393.
 
Wow


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Friday, June 16, 2023, 16:59:21
A declaration! To get a few overs in tonight! Fucking unbelievable.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, June 16, 2023, 16:59:31
391-8 at close at over 5 an over. Ok, we could have shed less wickets. But this is Bazball through and through. Pleased with the score. And Joe Root. Wow


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, June 16, 2023, 17:00:23
Easy tiger, it’s not close, it’s a declaration! My bad. I went for a fag. Wow. Never seen that before.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: adje on Friday, June 16, 2023, 17:01:57
At least get the 400 up. But,maybe a master stroke


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Friday, June 16, 2023, 17:02:38
At least get the 400 up. But,maybe a master stroke

Caught me by surprise!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, June 16, 2023, 17:23:44
https://twitter.com/bbctms/status/1669753418431311899/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1669753418431311899&currentTweetUser=bbctms

Not the biggest Phil Tufnell fan. But this reaction is brilliant. One of the most bonkers and yet completely sane things I’ve ever seen on a cricket field, that declaration


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, June 16, 2023, 17:41:43
Is Root the best England batsman ever? Yes. Yes he is


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 10:33:08
Warner snaffled by Broad once again. 29-1


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 10:33:23
Marnus first ball!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 10:35:29
Broad on a hat trick!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 10:38:33
You can't beat a bit of wobbly seam.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 11:18:45
Smith looking rather agitated out there. England on top


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 11:49:47
Stokes gets Smith leg before.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 11:49:54
Bowling skipper!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 11:52:27
I was convinced that was high. Get in Stokes-ey!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 11:54:14
I love listening to Bairstow-ey behind the stumps when Mo is bowling.

‘Goodness me!!’

‘Gosh!’

‘Wow!’


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 13:24:54
Aussies seem to be piling the runs on.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 13:43:20
Need a flurry of wickets now. Pressure back on the Oz


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 14:21:03
Could do with a wicket before tea


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Kinky Tom on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 14:54:18
Yesterday was absolutely brilliant, the Hollies is one of the greatest stands I've every seen let alone been involved in.  One of the best sporting days out I've ever had. Such a shame us football fans can't be trusted to drink in the stands.  Great cricket was the cherry on top.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 14:56:58
Yesterday was absolutely brilliant, the Hollies is one of the greatest stands I've every seen let alone been involved in.  One of the best sporting days out I've ever had. Such a shame us football fans can't be trusted to drink in the stands.  Great cricket was the cherry on top.

What I like about cricket is the banter, plenty of humour and piss taking without the nastiness of a Football match and appreciation also shown to the opposition.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Kinky Tom on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 15:06:13
Exactly, we were all ripping each other to pieces and everybody took it in the way it was intended, great friendly banter.  I was sat next to a few older Aussies, they were actually very quiet and seemed to be there more for actually concentrating on the cricket, think they enjoyed the day, hope so.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 15:08:40
Exactly, we were all ripping each other to pieces and everybody took it in the way it was intended, great friendly banter.  I was sat next to a few older Aussies, they were actually very quiet and seemed to be there more for actually concentrating on the cricket, think they enjoyed the day, hope so.

Is it a long day being inside the stadium over 7 hours?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 16:10:33
What I like about cricket is the banter, plenty of humour and piss taking without the nastiness of a Football match and appreciation also shown to the opposition.

I remember going to a Glos v Somerset Sunday League game at Bristol & it rained most of the day.
So we spent quite a lot of it in the Jessops Tavern where the fans of either side were having a Pool match between them. There was much beer (and cider) flowing and lots of singing & banter flying around but no hint of a fight breaking out.

The irony being that most of them were City & Rovers fans and wanting to kick the shit out of each other a few months later


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 16:15:26
I remember going to a Glos v Somerset Sunday League game at Bristol & it rained most of the day.
So we spent quite a lot of it in the Jessops Tavern where the fans of either side were having a Pool match between them. There was much beer (and cider) flowing and lots of singing & banter flying around but no hint of a fight breaking out.

The irony being that most of them were City & Rovers fans and wanting to kick the shit out of each other a few months later

Good story posh! I'm surprised more locals don't go to Bristol when Gloucestershire are playing there as it's a decent day out.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 16:41:47
Really looking forward to my day at Lords, haven’t spent the last 2 days sat in my ass watching in front of the TV.

I’m off to Gloucestershire v Kent tonight in the 20/20. Hopefully a bit of evening entertainment and a good game.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 16:46:25
Should be a good night if the predicted showers stay away.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Kinky Tom on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 17:10:12
Is it a long day being inside the stadium over 7 hours?

Not at all although it felt like it sometimes when queuing for beer, I joined 1 queue with about 6 ppl in front of me and it still took 40 minutes to get served, bit of a shambles in that regard.  Like I say though in the stands themselves flew by, especially once the Hollies was rocking.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Kinky Tom on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 17:12:05
Oh, and the group behind us, it turns out, came to the bar I run in the Alpes in March, hopefully they'll return this winter coming.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 17:53:12
Oh, and the group behind us, it turns out, came to the bar I run in the Alpes in March, hopefully they'll return this winter coming.

It sounds like you had a cracking day Tom how did you get there train or other means🤔


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Kinky Tom on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 19:33:42
Via car to Geneva, flight to Luton, bus to MK then train to New Street, was a long day.  Just done similar on the way back except two train changes and flying from Gatwick, need to drive again now which is about 2.5 hours.  I do have some left over curry from last night to look forward to once back rhough


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, June 17, 2023, 19:40:56
Wow that's dedication 😀


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 07:50:29
Ultimately a very disappointing day 2. Broad’s no-ball was shocking and Foakes wouldn’t have made the mistakes that Johnny did. But still have a lead and the game is finely poised, it’s been one helluva test match for the neutral. Come on England!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 08:43:28
Really disappointing day 2 after winning the first session. Carey, Khawaja, alongside some lower order blows from Cummins and Lyon should be able to get the Aussies to parity, or a little bit ahead. Third innings are never easy and on a pitch offering something to the spinners, Lyon fancy his chances. The Bairstow missed stumping, dropped catch and Broad no ball summed up how that last session went. Very nervous for today


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 08:51:32
I'm not too down, a few things went wrong yesterday but chances are being created, it's not like the Aussies look completely dominant at any point. As hard as the third innings could be, the fourth will be worse. The Aussies will need a proper lead, a 20-30 isn't going to cut it.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 08:58:46
I'm not too down, a few things went wrong yesterday but chances are being created, it's not like the Aussies look completely dominant at any point. As hard as the third innings could be, the fourth will be worse. The Aussies will need a proper lead, a 20-30 isn't going to cut it.

True, but then again, think Lyon in the third innings will be more threatening than Ali in the fourth, just due to his consistency. Still, you’d like to think Crawley, Duckett, Pope, Root, Brook, Stokes and Bairstow have enough to get us a healthy lead. Australia have a poor record chasing fourth innings, especially in England


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 10:15:13
Bairstow isnt helping himself in the Foakes debate, is he?
I just can’t see who you drop to get Foakes in after Bairstows innings with the bat.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 10:36:43
Bairstow isnt helping himself in the Foakes debate, is he?
I just can’t see who you drop to get Foakes in after Bairstows innings with the bat.

To play devils advocate he scored 78, but the missed stumping & dropped catch have probably cost more.
Obviously that’s a sample of one innings but it’s clearly something that needs to be thought through


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 10:37:41
Bairstow isnt helping himself in the Foakes debate, is he?
I just can’t see who you drop to get Foakes in after Bairstows innings with the bat.

Really tricky one. Can’t see how either of the openers can make way, Bairstow has to stay in for his batting and the same with Brook. We don’t have to talk about Root. We can’t have one less seamer with our aging attack. I think all things considered, we have to stick with Bairstow behind the stumps and hope this is just rust, which to be fair, it could well be


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 10:39:55
Really tricky one. Can’t see how either of the openers can make way, Bairstow has to stay in for his batting and the same with Brook. We don’t have to talk about Root. We can’t have one less seamer with our aging attack. I think all things considered, we have to stick with Bairstow behind the stumps and hope this is just rust, which to be fair, it could well be

Pretty much echo my thoughts.
Crawley was the one up for debate before his innings, and he certainly can’t be dropped after that.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 10:44:16
Pretty much echo my thoughts.
Crawley was the one up for debate before his innings, and he certainly can’t be dropped after that.

Also have to take into account that not dropping players seems like a cornerstone of Bazball. I think if there was a painfully obvious way to get Foakes in even that would be put to the test, but seeing as there isn’t, I fully expect we’ll stick with Bairstow


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 10:53:52
I also question if the deceleration was too early why not try for 450 and still have the new ball in the first session of the second day.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 11:04:25
I also question if the deceleration was too early why not try for 450 and still have the new ball in the first session of the second day.

I don't think the declaration was a cricketing decision, ultimately. It was an expression of intent to stamp Bazball on the world of cricket. Regardless of the outcome. I like it


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 11:08:30
I don't think the declaration was a cricketing decision, ultimately. It was an expression of intent to stamp Bazball on the world of cricket. Regardless of the outcome. I like it

Maybe but at the moment it dosen't look like it's paid off. Also with the thundery atmospheric conditions we have to expect the ball to move a lot which could be a problem if we get to bat later this afternoon.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 11:10:57
Maybe but at the moment it dosen't look like it's paid off. Also with the thundery atmospheric conditions we have to expect the ball to move a lot which could be a problem if we get to bat later this afternoon.

I agree. It was always a risk. But we’d probably be saying it paid off if Broad didn’t no ball and Bairstow didn’t fluff three opportunities. I’m not a fan of ‘whatabouterry’ but if we lose this test, it won’t be because of the declaration any more than it’ll be because of England cocking up four regulation chances.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 11:13:11
I agree. It was always a risk. But we’d probably be saying it paid off if Broad didn’t no ball and Bairstow didn’t fluff three opportunities. I’m not a fan of ‘whatabouterry’ but if we lose this test, it won’t be because of the declaration any more than it’ll be because of England cocking up four regulation chances.

My worry now are the conditions playing into the Aussies hands and we collapse in the second innings. Hope I'm wrong!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 11:13:54
If those 4 chances are taken, or even if 2,3 of them were, the declaration looks like a genius move.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 11:15:18
Fine margins I guess, sometimes they work others they don't but the match is finally balanced.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 11:18:15
My worry now are the conditions playing into the Aussies hands and we collapse in the second innings. Hope I'm wrong!

What I’m doing as a fan is trying to buy into the ‘fuck it! If we lose, we lose entertaining!’ mentality of Bazball. I’d rather we lost being innovative and actually doing something interesting rather than limping and whimpering to getting battered like normal. We might lose this test, we might lose the next. I think we need to get fully behind this madness 😁


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 11:19:31
What I’m doing as a fan is trying to buy into the ‘fuck it! If we lose, we lose entertaining!’ mentality of Bazball. I’d rather we lost being innovative and actually doing something interesting rather than limping and whimpering to getting battered like normal. We might lose this test, we might lose the next. I think we need to get fully behind this madness 😁

Spot on even I used to struggle watching Test cricket when Atherton was captain.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 11:21:19
Spot on even I used to struggle watching Test cricket when Atherton was captain.

Eugh. Don’t remind me


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 11:23:07
Eugh. Don’t remind me

Historically what would be a good second innings lead on that wicket for the Aussies to chase any idea🤔


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 11:31:02
Historically what would be a good second innings lead on that wicket for the Aussies to chase any idea🤔

Not a clue.

Nemo?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 11:34:17
Robinson gets one. I love how Stokes plays with the field to confuse the batsman when the surface is saying nothing


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 11:47:10
1. 378/3 by England vs India, 2022

Only twice had a team previously chased down a target of 200 or more on this ground. England, under new management, wrote another chapter in their wonderful story that is the Summer of 2022, smashing 378/3 to level the series 2-2 against India.

Before that

2. 283/5 by South Africa vs England, 2008

South Africa between 2006 and 2015 were a team to behold. Their away record in that period was a hallmark of a great team, and one such great victory was at Edgbaston in 2008. Graeme Smith’s magnificent 154* was too good for an England attack that included James Anderson and Andrew Flintoff.


3. 211/3 by England vs New Zealand, 1999

England enjoyed some wonderful run chases against New Zealand at Lord’s, Trent Bridge and Headingley in 2022. They also enjoyed a solid run chase way back in 1999, which remains the only other occasion a team tracked down 200+ to win a Test on this ground.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 11:55:31
Lead of 7 runs game on😀


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 11:58:17
Lead of 7 runs game on😀

On paper, we’ve won the first innings. They’ve scored less, and taken longer to do it. But the game almost restarts now. If we can stifle Lyon, we should win


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 12:02:37
On paper, we’ve won the first innings. They’ve scored less, and taken longer to do it. But the game almost restarts now. If we can stifle Lyon, we should win

Fingers crossed but somehow I reckon the weather will play a part!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 12:07:35
Lead of 320 ish should be enough. Won’t be easy to bat third innings, but Aussies will not be looking forward to bat on this deck in the fourth innings. Uneven bounce should come into play hopefully, and with the pitch starting to turn, have to hope Ali can bowl, and bowl well.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 12:15:04
Lead of 320 ish should be enough. Won’t be easy to bat third innings, but Aussies will not be looking forward to bat on this deck in the fourth innings. Uneven bounce should come into play hopefully, and with the pitch starting to turn, have to hope Ali can bowl, and bowl well.

Honestly I can't see us getting a lead that high. If we do I'm sure it'll be a winning score. I'll be happy with 250-280.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 12:21:27
Honestly I can't see us getting a lead that high. If we do I'm sure it'll be a winning score. I'll be happy with 250-280.

Realistically, neither can I, however, this is a slow, low deck, not too dissimilar from the pitches we played on in Pakistan. Obviously Australia’s bowling attack is far, far superior, but England went alright out there when setting totals on them pitches. Do agree though, would be happy with 250+


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 14:27:44
About to go off again


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 14:38:29
Terrible, terrible time to lose those wickets


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 14:42:03
Got the wrong end of conditions here.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, June 18, 2023, 14:51:19
I was a little weary of a collapse because of the conditions this afternoon


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, June 19, 2023, 09:22:57
Moeen's fucked his finger, which is a predictable outcome for a man who hasn't bowled more than ten overs in years being asked to bowl 30.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Monday, June 19, 2023, 10:12:48
Brilliant start from England, especially Root. Keep it up boys


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Monday, June 19, 2023, 10:29:03
Moeen's fucked his finger, which is a predictable outcome for a man who hasn't bowled more than ten overs in years being asked to bowl 30.

I'm not sure how being a regular red ball bowler stops him cutting his finger?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Monday, June 19, 2023, 10:31:02
I'm not sure how being a regular red ball bowler stops him cutting his finger?

It’s a blister isn’t it, not a cut.

More bowling over the last couple of years would have hardened the area where he’s got the blister.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Monday, June 19, 2023, 10:33:47
Yup. If I stop playing guitar for even a few days and then pick it up again the tops of my fingers feel more sensitive


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Monday, June 19, 2023, 10:36:15
It’s a blister isn’t it, not a cut.

More bowling over the last couple of years would have hardened the area where he’s got the blister.

Haven't seen that, press were reporting it as a cut  initially.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Monday, June 19, 2023, 10:40:09
I'm not sure how being a regular red ball bowler stops him cutting his finger?

Probably because the injury has been caused by the amount of bowling he has done in this match, something that he's not been used to doing for quite some time (only bowls a handful of overs in T20 cricket)


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, June 19, 2023, 10:44:34
I'm not sure how being a regular red ball bowler stops him cutting his finger?

Same way that someone who hasn't picked up a guitar in years is going to shred their finger trying to play a show. Nothing to do with the colour of the ball, just volume of bowling it.

What do we think the chances of Stokes declaring at some point around tea today are? (assuming we're not bowled out).


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Monday, June 19, 2023, 10:51:12
Same way that someone who hasn't picked up a guitar in years is going to shred their finger trying to play a show. Nothing to do with the colour of the ball, just volume of bowling it.

What do we think the chances of Stokes declaring at some point around tea today are? (assuming we're not bowled out).

Definitely see a declaration today, especially with tomorrows forecast.
Imagine we will try and get to around 300-350 ASAP before declaring.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, June 19, 2023, 12:16:11
DRS having a very funny day.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Monday, June 19, 2023, 13:33:59
Tickets available tomorrow £25


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Monday, June 19, 2023, 13:39:24
Bairstow goes.
Could really do with another 80-100 here.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Monday, June 19, 2023, 13:49:08
Now Stokes


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Monday, June 19, 2023, 13:50:20
Bairstow goes.
Could really do with another 80-100 here.

I’m hoping for a bit more. This will be the key partnership (obviously) if we are to get a really tough score to chase


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Monday, June 19, 2023, 13:52:42
Now Stokes

Whoops. My fault, that


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Monday, June 19, 2023, 15:17:51
All out.
Lead by 280. Very finely poised.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, June 19, 2023, 15:19:45
On a knife edge😀


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, June 19, 2023, 15:28:40
A cracking game this, living up to the hype so far.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Monday, June 19, 2023, 15:30:33
Have a feeling the Aussies are going to get these quite comfortably and win by 6 wickets, hope I’m wrong & we knock them over for under 200


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, June 19, 2023, 15:31:56
Have a feeling the Aussies are going to get these quite comfortably and win by 6 wickets, hope I’m wrong & we knock them over for under 200

This was  my worry yesterday once the weather & conditions changed.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Monday, June 19, 2023, 16:00:24
Just saw this on the BBC TM special site, think this is going to be the difference at the end of the game unless England can improve in the field

Andy Zaltzman
Cricket statistician on Test Match Special
By my count, Australia have made 15 chances in the game and taken 12 of them.

England taken five of their 10 chances in the field.

Meanwhile, Alex Carey took nine of his 10 opportunities behind the stumps, Jonny Bairstow is on just one from five so far.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, June 19, 2023, 16:40:30
I can see the Aussies cruising to victory if the weather dosen't interrupt tomorrow


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, June 19, 2023, 16:42:40
280 is a very good chase on the final day. Plenty of twists in this yet, but they have made a good start. Think I'd get Root on, pitch is turning.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, June 19, 2023, 17:00:59
What time does play end this evening is it 7pm🤔


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, June 19, 2023, 17:18:37
Broad gets Marnus again. Narrative potential there.

Smith tonight and we're cooking.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Monday, June 19, 2023, 17:19:53
1 more tonight would be brilliant.
2 more would be huge!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Monday, June 19, 2023, 17:38:29
And now Smith!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, June 19, 2023, 17:38:50
Excellent  :clap:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Monday, June 19, 2023, 17:41:08
Boland in as nightwatchman. Suicide


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 07:50:30
Bit of rain around this morning to make things even spicier.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 07:54:48
Live in Birmingham and bought tickets - gotta be out the ground by 5.30. Squeaky bum time!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 08:51:35
Doesn't look like we're going to get any play before 1pm.

With the conditions you'd like to think the three seamers can take those 7 wickets fairly comfortably, but this test match has been so back and forth you just can't tell.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 09:07:42
Will be interesting to see how the Aussies come out and play with it looking like they’ll lose nearly a session of batting.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 11:48:56
If we get started at about 2 or so this is going to be a stonking 50 overs or so.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 12:42:11
2.15pm start


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 13:09:24
This is going to be good.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 13:41:49
Decent nightwatchman contribution from Boland here


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 13:44:24
Decent nightwatchman contribution from Boland here

On his bike now  :D


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 14:06:15
Decent nightwatchman contribution from Boland here

It is a bit funny to see him scoring more than Marnus and Smith combined.

Head is a strange batter. Excellent record but he's backing off to square leg more than I do and looks about as comfortable against the short ball!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 14:27:08
I was half way through getting cross about bringing on a one fingered Moeen on and giving them free runs... I have no idea whether Stokes is a genius, but he isn't he's super lucky and frankly, who cares which is true!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 15:13:44
Good partnership for the Aussies… Khawaja looks like he could bat all day


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 15:37:22
98 to win, 5 wickets in hand, one long session ahead. Predictions time? I think England by five runs, but it's going to be an absolute cracker.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 15:40:11
Hope your right and still all to play for but can see the Aussies winning with wickets in hand as conditions seem pretty good for batting.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 15:43:19
If we can't win a test match in front of an Edgbaston crowd where Smith and Labuschagne have barely contributed with the bat, you wonder if we're capable of winning at all.

Australia for me are comfortably the better side, but Stokes the better captain. He's doing his absolute best with what he has available.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 16:09:56
Twisty twisty, turny turny


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 16:11:35
If we can't win a test match in front of an Edgbaston crowd where Smith and Labuschagne have barely contributed with the bat, you wonder if we're capable of winning at all.

Australia for me are comfortably the better side, but Stokes the better captain. He's doing his absolute best with what he has available.

What have you based them being comfortably the better side on?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 16:27:29
What have you based them being comfortably the better side on?


I mean in general, not necessarily in terms of this test match.

They have the top 3 batsmen in the world, the beast seam attack in the world, a genuine world class spinner and a decent all rounder too.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Boy About Town on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 16:31:26
Keep Mo away from bowling. We cannot leak cheap runs here. Simple equation, take out the tail. Khawaja will not be moved easy.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Kinky Tom on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 16:37:31
Huge moment!!!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 16:38:16
Tense finish😳


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 16:38:54
Oh wow. Carey is going to have to start playing some shots now. I don't think Australia can just limp over the line with what they have left?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 16:39:22
Well well well well well well.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 16:54:28
6 holes in the ground


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 17:01:16
There are people out there, that say test cricket is boring.

More fool them.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 17:02:37
It may have been in the 80's but not now😀


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 17:04:40
New ball imminent.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 17:09:46
Stifle the run rate forcing them to take chances


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 17:10:32
Top catch by Root


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 17:11:06
Third time Carey's given him the chance to do that, but fair play none of them were easy. Daft batting.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 17:36:46
Well, just when I thought my nerves had just about calmed down, we're back into those twists and turns.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Kinky Tom on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 17:39:38
It's very tense, giving Root 1 more was a good decision, the second was not.  Could be the winning over in effect.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 17:43:20
Not looking good, going to be a few runs short I fear


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Kinky Tom on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 17:44:47
What is it with Edgbaston Ashes Tests


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Kinky Tom on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 17:45:54
That one from Crawley a few minutes ago was so cruel


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 17:46:55
Josh Hazelwood must be absolutely shitting himself. So much worse than being in the middle.

Absolute stormer of a test this, whatever happens.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Kinky Tom on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 17:47:01
WinViz still has us favourites, I can't see it.  We could easily wrap it up in one over but they have plenty of overs to get their 16.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 17:47:13
Stokes has got it wrong for the first time as captain in the last 30 minutes


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 18:17:14
What a game. There'll be lots of focus on lots of small things, but big picture, that was fucking brilliant and I'll have four more of those please. Phenomenal effort from Cummins with bat and ball.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 18:19:00
That was absolutely superb, 4 more like that please.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 18:21:18
They can stop putting that ridiculous win prediction thing on the screen from now on.

It changed its mind every 5 minutes. England were 76% at one point today.



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Kinky Tom on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 18:24:12
Bugger, that was a fantastic game of cricket and day 1 was one of the best sporting days out of my life but feels like an opportunity missed there. Moeen has a week to heal and toughen up that blister.

Brilliant match, gutted to have lost it in the last hour as we'd done such a great job keeping the run rate down up to then.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 18:25:11
Cracking entertainment with many twist keeping the fans on edge. Well done Australia but nothing for England to fear in the second Test at Lords.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 18:28:58
They can stop putting that ridiculous win prediction thing on the screen from now on.

It changed its mind every 5 minutes. England were 76% at one point today.



This just in - 24% chances happen. Just the odds of two heads in consecutive coin flops. Really not that rare.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 18:49:22
To get Labuschagne and Smith out twice cheaply and still not manage to win is a slight worry, as they won’t be kept quiet all series. Brilliant test match, but a massive opportunity missed


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 18:52:22
I can’t not wait till next week now.  :pint:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 19:25:08
This just in - 24% chances happen. Just the odds of two heads in consecutive coin flops. Really not that rare.

Yes that's the point I'm making. That's why it's utterly useless.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, June 21, 2023, 07:26:03
The day after, the happier I am about that test. If England play even close to normally, that game doesn't even get close to a result - lost the best part of a day's worth of overs over the four days and came down to the last few overs. England played in a way that made a result possible, risking losing to win. When you do that, sometimes you lose.

I do want Foakes keeping though, but I appreciate that's hard to achieve. I think I'd be tempted to have Brook open with Bairstow at 5. Brook could do the Crawley role, just better.

Team selection at Lord's will be fascinating. Moeen seems unlikely to be able to play a full part, and we can't carry two mostly crocked all rounders. Wood comes in, maybe for Anderson although Broad (whilst brilliant in this test) looked very tired. Big week for the physio!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Wednesday, June 21, 2023, 07:30:16
The day after, the happier I am about that test. If England play even close to normally, that game doesn't even get close to a result - lost the best part of a day's worth of overs over the four days and came down to the last few overs. England played in a way that made a result possible, risking losing to win. When you do that, sometimes you lose.

I do want Foakes keeping though, but I appreciate that's hard to achieve. I think I'd be tempted to have Brook open with Bairstow at 5. Brook could do the Crawley role, just better.

I wouldn’t swap Crawley see, I think he deserves to keep his place after his first innings.
I’d bring Foakes in for a straight swap with Bairstow. Foakes isn’t the worst with the bat, and them missed stumpings and catches are worth more than Bairstow’s runs are, in my opinion.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, June 21, 2023, 07:33:53
They would have been in this test for sure, not sure that's the case in the average test though - the people who crunch these numbers always seem to say that you pick the better bat. There's a danger of fighting the last war I suppose- that pitch was very atypical for England, much more like a Pakistan/UAE pitch which is flat and low with no real swing/seam throughout. In those conditions you need to take every chance, and stumpings come up. I'd be surprised if Lord's was similar.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Wednesday, June 21, 2023, 07:36:33
It’s going to be a long week till next Wednesday, that I do know.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Wednesday, June 21, 2023, 10:40:37
I wouldn’t swap Crawley see, I think he deserves to keep his place after his first innings.
I’d bring Foakes in for a straight swap with Bairstow. Foakes isn’t the worst with the bat, and them missed stumpings and catches are worth more than Bairstow’s runs are, in my opinion.

Agreed - we have enough aggressive batting to sacrifice Bairstow's aggressiveness. We'd have likely won that if we had Foakes.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Saxondale on Saturday, June 24, 2023, 15:36:32
Impressed by the ladies fight back against the Aussies.  Not far from equalling the Aussies and one of them hitting a double ton.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, June 24, 2023, 15:40:11
Impressed by the ladies fight back against the Aussies.  Not far from equalling the Aussies and one of them hitting a double ton.

Been a very good effort. Hopefully the pitch will break up a bit and give them a chance of a result. Aussies are very good though - basically 10 batters and 8 bowlers, which feels a bit unfair.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Tuesday, June 27, 2023, 09:24:50
Tongue comes in for Moeen then, was expecting to see Wood myself.

This time tomorrow I shall be sat at Lords beer in hand  :pint:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, June 27, 2023, 09:35:50
Wood supposedly isn't fully fit, which is a real shame, he'd have been a huge asset. Tongue isn't a bad player, but not sure we really need five RFM bowlers in one side even if Stokes isn't fit. 


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: horlock07 on Wednesday, June 28, 2023, 10:00:40
I'm no doubt very late to the party, but when did test matches start starting on Wednesdays, wasn't it always Thursdays?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, June 28, 2023, 10:35:04
I'm no doubt very late to the party, but when did test matches start starting on Wednesdays, wasn't it always Thursdays?

The first test started on a Friday. They're a bit all over the place now because they're trying to squeeze the series in to a shorter period so the whole thing is over by August.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Wednesday, June 28, 2023, 10:49:18
Disappointed to not get a wicket in the 9 overs there. I do think Foakes gets across and catches the one that Root dropped...


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, June 28, 2023, 10:50:16
Disappointed to not get a wicket in the 9 overs there. I do think Foakes gets across and catches the one that Root dropped...

Foakes doesn't carry off a protester bodily though, so that's a tick in Bairstow's favour.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Wednesday, June 28, 2023, 11:42:25
Terrible session this is turning into


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, June 28, 2023, 11:55:28
That'll help. Really good ball from Tongue, who was under pressure from Warner. Top of off, nicked in, probably helped a bit by the angle. Not sure you can really blame the batter for leaving that (except for the obvious fact it did hit the stumps).


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Broadbents Tackle on Wednesday, June 28, 2023, 13:13:58
Tongue giving the Aussies a licking.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, June 28, 2023, 13:14:38
He bowls some very good balls does Tongue. Not as reliable as the Broads/Andersons but the odd absolutely unplayable one. It's interesting because he gets talked about as being quick but he's not Wood/Archer pace who bowl 90+ every ball. He's 86-88mph but it seems to be enough.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Wednesday, June 28, 2023, 15:12:33
Im so drunk :pint:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: horlock07 on Wednesday, June 28, 2023, 15:14:15
Not watching it or really following the commentary, but whilst not losing wickets they don't seem to be scoring runs either, is it just a shit batting wicket?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, June 28, 2023, 15:15:35
Not watching it or really following the commentary, but whilst not losing wickets they don't seem to be scoring runs either, is it just a shit batting wicket?

They're scoring at almost 4 an over, that's fast for anyone not England over the last 12 months.

Pitch is a little on the slow side, over rate is very poor.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Wednesday, June 28, 2023, 17:22:02
Does Root’s one good over show a slight problem with selection for the second Test?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, June 29, 2023, 11:02:39
Death, taxes, Steve Smith hundreds.

We've done okay this morning, I'm a bit concerned that this isn't anything like a 400 pitch though. We'll need to bat well.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, June 29, 2023, 15:30:33
Lyon looks to have done a calf running in to take a catch. Is that the McGrath-steps-on-a-ball moment?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, June 29, 2023, 15:43:33
And Root gloves behind off a no ball. Tehehe.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Thursday, June 29, 2023, 15:45:42
And Root gloves behind off a no ball. Tehehe.

Is Broad bowling for the Aussies now? 😉


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, June 29, 2023, 15:46:49
Is Broad bowling for the Aussies now? 😉

Green is bowling them at a rate that makes the English bowlers look neat and tidy!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Friday, June 30, 2023, 11:07:03
Just throwing away wickets, frustrating to watch.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, June 30, 2023, 11:08:32
Just throwing away wickets, frustrating to watch.

We've become a team of Kevin Pietersens, which is brilliant... most of the time.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Friday, June 30, 2023, 11:10:33
We've become a team of Kevin Pietersens, which is brilliant... most of the time.

We were 180/1 when Nathan Lyon went off injured, we could have easily taken a lead into the second innings, whilst still playing BazBall.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, June 30, 2023, 11:22:31
Oh it's been stupid as all hell but this is the rough that comes with the smooth I fear. I don't think they think you *can* play smart Bazball. They'll just say that the execution was wrong not the intention.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Friday, June 30, 2023, 11:24:10
Oh it's been stupid as all hell but this is the rough that comes with the smooth I fear. I don't think they think you *can* play smart Bazball. They'll just say that the execution was wrong not the intention.

Trouble is, we go 2.0 here, which at the moment is looking likely, then you could say that’s series over.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Friday, June 30, 2023, 13:12:45
Just throwing away wickets, frustrating to watch.
Harry Brook batted like a number 11 in a village team.

Very disappointing from a player with obvious talent.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Friday, June 30, 2023, 13:16:03
Trouble is, we go 2.0 here, which at the moment is looking likely, then you could say that’s series over.

Lets be honest, the squad is not much different to 2021.  While it's frustrating to see wickets tumble, they did back then as well but for a lot less runs.  We didn't suddenly find a bunch of world class batsmen overnight, we just gave them a way of getting 50% more runs from the same number of balls they still face each innings.  Australia are just a little bit better in each department, so can handle us getting 300-350 in quick fashion without needing to panic or change their own approach.  They know they'll likely chip that score off.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Friday, June 30, 2023, 13:42:42
How many do we think Australia need to take the game beyond England?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, June 30, 2023, 13:44:12
How many do we think Australia need to take the game beyond England?

England like fourth innings targets, they've made an art of it. I think Aus want 350+ lead to feel comfortable, maybe more without Lyon.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, June 30, 2023, 15:29:14
Labuschagne plum lbw and we don't review because Broad thinks everything is out so he just gets ignored now. It's not going well.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Friday, June 30, 2023, 16:08:10
Labuschagne plum lbw and we don't review because Broad thinks everything is out so he just gets ignored now. It's not going well.
It was going down leg!

But no, it’s not going well!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, June 30, 2023, 16:14:04
It was going down leg!

But no, it’s not going well!

Not that one, the one that was out.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Friday, June 30, 2023, 16:22:07
Much like football teams that are ill equipped to play out from the back & the opposition can just bide their time apply a press & wait for the mistakes to come.
Maybe Bazball is in need of a touch of pragmatism when it comes to an Ashes series?
Someone that will tie down one end when batting and just score at a more traditional rate for test cricket & the other end can just hammer away.

Were it not for an extremely dodgy elbow then it would have been fun to see the Aussies hopping around on the purpose built low slow pitches.
Hopefully the return of Wood will make a difference.

Series not over yet, but England might need to bat this one out in order to save the day.
Not sure that it's in the current DNA though.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: swindon74 on Friday, June 30, 2023, 17:13:30
It was disappointing to see root get sucked into the ‘Let’s try smash the fuck out of anything short’ game yesterday. He doesn’t need to change his game! Just duck and weave and they will soon go back to bowling full again! We need to find a balance between attacking and being a little bit more sensible when needed!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Friday, June 30, 2023, 19:54:23
We don't have anyone, other than Root, able to do that though.  The prior year or two showed that our ability to play the regular Test game had fallen to Atherton/Hussein captaincy period lows.  Look at Crawley when he isn't free to just hit the thing - he gets 10-20 and nicks one to the Keeper.  At least this way he gets 30 or 40 before doing the same.

Root is the only one who struggles at times with the new approach, he should indeed just do him, he always had a decent strike rate anyway.  Any innings where he has just settled into a rhythm, he has looked great.  Whenever he has gone chasing he has looked at the same level as the rest of them.

I think we have to stick with it and find a spinner, maybe another decent batsman comes onto the scene in the next year or so.  Stokes is a conundrum - he has always been a better short form player, his average as a batsman is meh and he can't bowl for long periods.  He'd barely scratch into the team on stats - BUT, Root showed what a big difference there can be in the way the game is played under a great vs poor captain.  Can we not just pick someone else and then sub a fielder off for Stokes when we are bowling?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Robinz on Friday, June 30, 2023, 21:40:21
Simple facts... Brendan MaCuĺlam style of test match  cricket can and is successful against teams like Pakistan Sri Lanka and lreland. Even possibly South Africa. However the two heavy weights namely Australia and India will get a handle over these tactics 9 times out of ten.
Yesterday was a terrible day .Brooks and Bairstows dismissals showed a  lack of experience for red ball cricket. Sorry Brendan test  match cricket is 15 sessions and you generally you need to win athe major majority  to win the game.
Bazball is a game of chance and a gamble.. A game played by teams that generally can't match it with the true professionals of test match cricket.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 07:43:43
We beat India playing like this last summer. They're clearly not simple facts, they're your opinion and that's fine.

We weren't beating Australia playing 'normal' cricket either. It's all a bit Kevin Keegan plays football - naïve in the extreme, but suddenly lots of people seem to think we were anything other than below average playing 'normally' with basically the same team. Can we improve? Of course, but not by burning everything to the ground and starting again.

Three and a half tests to go. Let's hold off on the funeral just yet and give them a chance to turn things round.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 08:05:16
What I will say is that I think they have bought in to having to take Bazball to the extreme just because it’s the ashes. Pre that final test in New Zealand, the approach was built on calculated risks and smart, aggressive cricket. If they had to sit in, they would. So far this series, they’ve shown that they’ll just go for it regardless, and the only reason I can think of doing that, is because they’ve fallen into the trap of getting caught on the ashes hype train.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 10:09:47
There is Bazball and there is stupidity.

Brook's exit was stupidity. Root needs to calm down. He was pumped up when bowling in the first innings and batted stupidly. Being given a let off from the no ball should have focussed him. The collapse  was pathetic.

The Aussie will bounce everyone in the second innings. I hope the England batsmen have the nous to leave those and punish the bad balls.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 10:40:35
This game is not over. There are going to be days like yesterday if you adopt the kind of approach to the game that England have. But it is working more often than not.

Hearing Vaughn moaning on about it over the last few days is becoming increasingly annoying. His "it can't just be about entertainment, it's about winning"  line would fly a bit better if England in their first 14 tests under Stokes hadn't already racked up about half the number of wins that they managed under Vaughn in more than 50 games. Yes Michael fans do want to see England win. They really don't want to see 50% of tests end in a draw, and to be clearly heading for a draw within 3 days of play. You know like they did when you were in charge.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 10:53:17
This game is not over. There are going to be days like yesterday if you adopt the kind of approach to the game that England have. But it is working more often than not.

Hearing Vaughn moaning on about it over the last few days is becoming increasingly annoying. His "it can't just be about entertainment, it's about winning"  line would fly a bit better if England in their first 14 tests under Stokes hadn't already racked up about half the number of wins that they managed under Vaughn in more than 50 games. Yes Michael fans do want to see England win. They really don't want to see 50% of tests end in a draw, and to be clearly heading for a draw within 3 days of play. You know like they did when you were in charge.
Pretty sure it is over! Over 260 ahead with 8 wickets remaining and neither batsman looking in trouble.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 11:10:42
This game is not over. There are going to be days like yesterday if you adopt the kind of approach to the game that England have. But it is working more often than not.

Hearing Vaughn moaning on about it over the last few days is becoming increasingly annoying. His "it can't just be about entertainment, it's about winning"  line would fly a bit better if England in their first 14 tests under Stokes hadn't already racked up about half the number of wins that they managed under Vaughn in more than 50 games. Yes Michael fans do want to see England win. They really don't want to see 50% of tests end in a draw, and to be clearly heading for a draw within 3 days of play. You know like they did when you were in charge.

This is it - if we'd give up a winning strategy to play banter cricket then I'd totally get the anger. But we were shit AND dull before.

Biggest problem for me in this series so far hasn't been the Bazball chat but the fact that we haven't managed to get a Wood/Archer/Stone pace bowler out there. Robinson is bowling late 70s here which is literally club standard stuff.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 11:19:56
Aussies are all at sea against the short ball now. Interesting development.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 11:23:58
Aussies are all at sea against the short ball now. Interesting development.

England will fancy chasing 350/380


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 11:31:17
I think Tongue has been quite impressive in this match.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 12:21:28
I think Tongue has been quite impressive in this match.

Very much so.

I’d bring Wood in for the text one for Anderson, he’s looked poor. The pitches aren’t for him at all.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 12:37:12
Very much so.

I’d bring Wood in for the text one for Anderson, he’s looked poor. The pitches aren’t for him at all.
I don’t think Wood is fit. If not, then Potts probably.

If Pope’s shoulder is buggered I’d bring Foakes in to keep wicket. Bairstow has been poor.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 12:44:07
Will Australia try and get a further 87 runs to give them a lead of 400 with a little of the final session left to bowl and one full day or will England take quick wickets! Intriguing stuff.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 13:50:02
Aussies seem to be happy to bat out the draw...


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 14:12:15
Cricket has always been an easy game. Just bowl short.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 14:13:17
Aussies seem to be happy to bat out the draw...
They are leading 1-0. Take time out of the game and get a lead of 350 and they have a possibility of maintaining the 1-0 or extending to 2-0.

Have a big thwack and there is more chance of England snatching a win.

The pitch being 2 paced will be difficult for England to chase.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 14:41:16
Cricket has always been an easy game. Just bowl short.

Been interesting as a one off, but this is pretty dire stuff to watch really. For all the talk of entertaining with the bat, not sure there would be many who want to watch this more than as a one off. Makes tactical sense with the pitch behaving as it is, but the entertainment factor is... not high.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 14:46:15
Stokes with no knees now bowling to Lyon with one leg. It's like M*A*S*H out there.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 15:09:33
Would it not be a good idea to bowl at the stumps?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 15:15:34
Would it not be a good idea to bowl at the stumps?

Not really, based on how this game has gone. 150/8 today not bothering, and England's innings was flying until they went short all the time.

Target is 370. It's big, but a long way short of what it could be. If we get off to a good start, this could be really fun.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 15:18:15
It's imperative we don't collapse in the final session today


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 15:37:57
Not really, based on how this game has gone. 150/8 today not bothering, and England's innings was flying until they went short all the time.

Target is 370. It's big, but a long way short of what it could be. If we get off to a good start, this could be really fun.
Not really, based on how this game has gone. 150/8 today not bothering, and England's innings was flying until they went short all the time.

Target is 370. It's big, but a long way short of what it could be. If we get off to a good start, this could be really fun.
A number 11 with one leg standing outside leg and swinging to leg - How wouldn’t an off stump Yorker have been a good ball to bowl?

Still, it’s done now.

371 looks tough - Duckett dropped!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 15:39:31
Would be nice if the commentators didn't sound like they want to slit their wrists. England had a great session to bowl through the Aussies and literally all they are doing every ball bowled is ducking moaning.

Just got the final wicket and they didn't even show any glimmer of emotion or pleasure. Richie Benaud they will never be.

Vaughn is a mard arsey cunt.

Getting the Aussies all out for 279 is good business even if a bit shit to watch. At least it gives them a chance to win. I think it'll go close. 371 to chase is doable if Root sticks to his own game and can set a nice 160ish+, just chip away at those runs. A couple of 50s that others are capable of - even three 40s would be fine {Crawley, Duckett Pope and Brook are all capable of putting in a half century or more each so Root could go for a slow and steady ton, Boycott style}. The remaining 6 or so players should be able to scratch about a ton together and if the Aussie try bouncing the shit out of everything, there will be NBs a plenty and some wides. Extras will prob score a solid 25+.

England should be able to get there I reckon with a whole day and three hours of cricket to play, with a steady strategy. Allow Root to play his game and let the ''One Dayers'' thrash it about. Could use someone like Dawid Malan right now  :hmmm: Aussies clearly playing for the draw so take it to them. Worse case scenario, it's a draw.

I'll predict an England win with two wickets remaining {no real point having Tongue and Anderson batting but good to keep someone like Stokes on strike and bring his R/R up a smidge.}

Catches win matches and that miss from Green could {hopefully} be a sign  :hmmm:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 15:47:05
Collapse has started😡


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 15:47:34
Not an ideal start. Should have listened to Jimmy and not collapsed - tactical error.

Second life for Duckett!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 15:48:25
Duckett LBW - game of inches! Or less than an inch!!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 15:48:58
I'm always sceptical when a team are bowled out for a relatively low score and you have to follow them and get nearly 100 more runs


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 15:57:51
Mountain to climb. Realistically, game (and potentially ashes) were lost during that mad 30 minute period in the afternoon of day 2 and then cemented in the morning of day 3. Frustrating as they have had massive opportunities in both tests.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: ChalkyWhiteIsGod on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 15:59:00
Could have been lost with that silly early declare really. There is being aggressive but try to remember it is test cricket.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 16:34:38
I'd say Bairstows missed stumpings, catches and the no-ball wicket for Kawaja in the first test is why we lost. Not because we declared with 2 wickets to spare.



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 16:37:51
Irresponsible batting, lack of pace and odd bowling decisions are going to lose this game.

Two decent balls from Starc and Cummings to remove Pope and Root. But, neither were unplayable.

Update: Ditto Brook!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 16:38:40
They didn't listen late afternoon collapse well underway🤣


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 16:38:59
Brilliant bowling from Cummins. What a cricketer


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 16:39:30
I hate to go against the overriding narrative, but they're just better than us at bowling, batting and catching, aren't they?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 16:40:31
I hate to go against the overriding narrative, but they're just better than us at bowling, batting and catching, aren't they?

I was thinking the same Nemo without wanting to criticise England.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 16:40:46
oh well, maybe next ashes


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 16:41:03
I hate to go against the overriding narrative, but they're just better than us at bowling, batting and catching, aren't they?
Yes.



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 16:41:31
I hate to go against the overriding narrative, but they're just better than us at bowling, batting and catching, aren't they?

Came into the series thinking we had the better/more in form top 7 and better bowlers for the conditions, but seems Australia trump us in both departments. They’ve improved A LOT since their 2019 tour, this is them at their peak I reckon. No real obvious flaws


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 16:48:19
Will be lucky if there's 3 sessions play tomorrow!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 16:51:38
Came into the series thinking we had the better/more in form top 7 and better bowlers for the conditions, but seems Australia trump us in both departments. They’ve improved A LOT since their 2019 tour, this is them at their peak I reckon. No real obvious flaws

Not sure why you would think that.  Best Test team currently with the top three batsmen in the world.

If we were playing the way we were under Root, we'd be done and dusted already without a sniff of a 300 score.  Our players are good one dayers, hence why the new approach delivers better results - they just play their natural game.

Australia are better Test players in every department though.  The gap is big, so to be as close as we were in the First test is pretty remarkable to any non-time traveler of 2021.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 16:51:53
Our bowlers can’t make the opposition bowlers hop around like theirs, because they bowl 10mph slower.

Tongue, as the fastest of the group, looked threatening at times.

Things may be different at Headingly, but at Lords you need pace.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 16:59:11
Not sure why you would think that.  Best Test team currently with the top three batsmen in the world.

If we were playing the way we were under Root, we'd be done and dusted already without a sniff of a 300 score.  Our players are good one dayers, hence why the new approach delivers better results - they just play their natural game.

Australia are better Test players in every department though.  The gap is big, so to be as close as we were in the First test is pretty remarkable to any non-time traveler of 2021.

Warner - On the decline, poor record in England.
Khawaja - Averaged 17 in England prior.
Carey, Green and Head all either unproven, or have struggled in England.

Khawaja has since gone on to have a fantastic tour, but their top 7, outside of Smith and Labuschagne, looked to be vulnerable in English conditions. Hasn’t happened to be the case, but prior to the series, I felt our top 7 was stronger for English conditions, on paper


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 17:07:25
Doesn't help that Anderson simply hasn't shown up this series.

I'm not geeky enough to know enough about conditions etc, are they out of favour for him or is it simply bad bowling for his standards?

Pace hasn't been an issue for us here in the past but the first wicket was a road and this one at lords both teams have resulted to bouncers to get wickets. The extra pace seems to have massively favoured OZ?



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 17:10:03
Doesn't help that Anderson simply hasn't shown up this series.

I'm not geeky enough to know enough about conditions etc, are they out of favour for him or is it simply bad bowling for his standards?

Pace hasn't been an issue for us here in the past but the first wicket was a road and this one at lords both teams have resulted to bouncers to get wickets. The extra pace seems to have massively favoured OZ?



He described the pitch at Edgbaston as “kryptonite” for him, was so flat and with no swing on offer, Anderson can become fairly ineffective on those tracks. In saying that, he bowled on similar pitches in Pakistan and did well.

This test, he’s bowled in favourable conditions and has just looked out of rhythm. Had an injury pre series which has definitely not helped, but he’s had a poor start to the series for sure


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 17:17:58
Wood and Archer huge misses then.



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 17:24:04
Anderson needs movement off the pitch and through the air. But without it all he has is accuracy. He doesn’t have the pace to trouble test batsmen.

The other thing, is I think his eyes have gone. He was one of Englands best fielders for years and never used to drop anything. However, he’s dropped 2 in this test whilst fielding square of the wicket. The ball comes to you fast there and it’s harder to pick the balls flight up. As a village cricketer for years, I noticed that happen myself.

I also remember Matthew Hoggard dropping in pace by 1 or 2 mph and finding him going from unplayable to cannon fodder. Headingly might suit Anderson though.

But, time and tide wait for no man. I think this will be Anderson’s last test series. I hope he goes out with a flourish.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 17:25:29
Wood and Archer huge misses then.

Archer is the fastest, then Wood, followed by Tongue then Potts.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 17:55:03
That is... a stroke of luck. Not sure I agree with that call.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Bogus Dave on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 18:55:27
The ball was on the ground. No different to taking a catch and immediately smothering it on the ground

Not that I think it will matter much in the reckoning


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, July 1, 2023, 19:10:55
That is... a stroke of luck. Not sure I agree with that call.

Really? I thought it was the most not out not out I’ve ever seen! Easy decision. If the shoe was on the other foot I’d absolutely be saying that was not a catch


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 07:08:15
Just watched the highlights again.....Such a shame that England didn't play old fashioned Test cricket at the beginning of their second innings - See off the new ball. Once the lacquer wore off, it appeared to get much easier to bat.

Uphill battle saving this Test now, but stranger things have happened.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 10:29:47
Cricket must've been so crap before the technology. Thank god for the review system.

Stokes clearly hits the ball first, given out LBW by the umpire.

But imagine we were out of reviews.



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 10:50:39
Read somewhere no team has ever scored 400+ at Lords batting first and lost.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 11:24:43
Bairstow has to score a hundred. Simple as that


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 11:32:31
Agreed as our tail end is quite poor.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 11:40:29
So, so daft from Bairstow


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: adje on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 11:44:07
That's just dumb. Don't think you can class it as "cheating".


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 11:45:04
That's just dumb. Don't think you can class it as "cheating".

Agreed, Carey threw the ball before he walked out his crease regardless. Really poor from Bairstow


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 11:55:37
What a joy to watch Stokes is when he plays like this.

He's going to get caught eventually but this is fun.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 11:56:49
Half way there with half wickets gone and two sessions to play....Tough ask, and a shame Duckett now gone. He has put in the hard yards that Pope, Crawley and somewhat Brook failed to do.

Another poor showing from Root - he really needs to play his traditional game and sit in there. Wicket slowly improved from a batting perspective and Stokes can obviously hit the high figures too.

Going to take something special from Bairstow, Broad and Robinson...not expecting much from Anderson or Tongue obviously.

I do think with a traditional Test approach in the first session, England would have made things easier for themselves in trying to win. Aussie's will probably slowly pick England off or the game will run out of time. A draw probably suits both right now but Aussies probably also seeing blood now. That would still leave everything to play for. Third Test clearly will be key for England and must win.

NB: On Australia...they actually are a very beatable side, which is frustrating. They're probably a slightly above average test side - the trouble with England is part of their own creating, they aren't playing anything like a traditional test side, not even individually. It's telling when the req R/R is currently around about or under 4 per over, proving that a fully aggressive approach isn't needed. They've got to mix it up a bit - let the ''one dayers'' play Bazball, then Root and maybe one other {not sure who - maybe Stokes}.

Edit: Strange out that. Bairstow really just needed a quick glance there and he stays in. Carey did well there and quick thinking. Bleak for England now unless Broad puts in a good performance...he's capable of half centuries but his only hundred at international level has come in Test cricket...v Pakistan...at Lord's - 169.

Good over then though - obviously going for it now. England do need a bit of that win at all cost mentality. Sometimes a bit too kind or nice about it. Go into Lunch needing about 15O and who knows. Have to treat anything after Lunch as an ODI with say 40 overs of play available and a RRR of still about 4 per over.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Saxondale on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 12:02:47
I think Ben Stokes is a bit annoyed.

Which is nice.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 12:02:58
I can't believe what I'm watching.

The crowd are up. He couldn't do it again could he? surely not.

I am gripped to the screen!!!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 12:04:50
Yowzer!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 12:06:13
Three Sixes from Stokes and Ton up. He'll get caught but it's no shock that a Kiwi would be fired up to score against the Aussies.

So we thought Bairstow needed to score a ton. I think Broad tickling a 3O and Stokes probably needs to double his score. There's another four away. Even the skeletons at Lords are off their seats.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 12:08:47
Got to get to less than 100 without losing Broad. Then suddenly OZ might start getting twitchy. Especially as this has happened before.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Saxondale on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 12:09:13
On the Bairstow dismissal rights and wrongs its interesting to hear Glenn Mcgrath being pretty uncomfortable about it and Aussie Jim Maxwell being absolutely very much against it.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 12:14:09
I think Ben Stokes is a bit annoyed.

Which is nice.

Yep, England far too nice at times. I hate it but in the Ashes you have to play gritty - like the Aussie's do. Win at all cost pretty much

Was happyish for England to go into Lunch needing about 150. But going into Lunch with both Stokes and Broad needing about 125.

Would go down as one of the big turnaround victories in Ashes history. Clever and calm heads needed now - Broad needs to drop his moaning, although he could be tactical. Do your talking with the bat - like Stokes it doing.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 12:17:46
On the Bairstow dismissal rights and wrongs its interesting to hear Glenn Mcgrath being pretty uncomfortable about it and Aussie Jim Maxwell being absolutely very much against it.

Yep, the Aussie contingency feel it's a bit more gamesmanship/opportunism than the English do. Spirit of the game nope but this is modern cricket and it falls within the laws of the game...but it's not cricket.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 12:17:52
Spirit of the game is extremely overrated imo. Australia have always been a ruthless side, part of the reason why they’ve dominated test cricket for such long periods. Just think it’s really, really naive from Bairstow. Anyway, brilliant hundred from Stokes, hoping the Aussies are getting some flashbacks to 2019 right about now.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Super Hans on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 12:20:03
Decided to try the cricket again now theres no footie. Its alright innit!

My amateur take on the Bairstow incident is Carey probably noticed he has a tendancy to wander and tried his luck. Smart play.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: adje on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 12:25:02
Maybe bowling bouncers at an injured No.11 isn't it in the "spirit" of the game.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 12:25:32
Got to get to less than 100 without losing Broad. Then suddenly OZ might start getting twitchy. Especially as this has happened before.

Think so, if Broad can find a 30/40/50 with a calmed head - which he is capable of at Test level then England have a very good chance. Think he has about 15 half centuries for England in this format.

Key wicket and nail in the coffin for the Aussie's is clearly to dismiss the Ginger Kiwi. Which as much as Stokes is fired up to knock them literally for six - they'll be more than happy with taking him out to seal the victory. Enlgand have the time now to get the runs comfortably slow and steady but do they have the personnel to get them there? Currently yes...makes it a more interesting end to day 5 of the Second Test. Fruity.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 12:33:36
Maybe bowling bouncers at an injured No.11 isn't it in the "spirit" of the game.

Maybe risking playing and causing further sustained damage/injury to their best available spinner and not deciding to just declare, also isn't in the spirit of the game? But that would be so un-Aussie.

It's moot anyway, bowling bouncers at someone with an injured calf wouldn't make much problem. He probably shouldn't have been out there in the first place. England were probably ''kind'' to him as they never once bowled at his feet.

Perhaps the Aussies will start bowling at Stokes knee though  :hmmm: :D


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 12:45:26
Australia still massive favourites but if England were to somehow pull this off, the momentum shift coinciding with Lyon missing the rest of the series would give England a huge boost going forward.



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 12:54:49
He he. Smith.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 13:12:08
Australia have lost their heads, very silly cricket on show


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 13:13:54
Stomach churning now.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 13:14:56
This is fucking brilliant


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 13:15:36
Stomach churning now.

I think England will win from here, the dismissal was the catalyst


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 13:28:04
Are Tongue or Robinson competent with a bat? at just hanging in there?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 13:28:58
Are Tongue or Robinson competent with a bat? at just hanging in there?

Robinson is reasonable, Tongue and Anderson are walking wickets.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 13:34:32
Ok fair enough.

Are we at the point yet where we'll be disappointed if we don't win?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 13:36:33
Not yet


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 14:11:15
Oh no.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 14:12:05
Disaster😡


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 14:14:41
It's fine we'll prod our way to the total with singles.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 14:16:12
It's not fine now.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 14:28:13
Where are the Just Stop Oil protesters when you need them.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 14:36:41
Where's the rain when you need it...oh well, close but no cigar. Great effort by both Stokes and Duckett. The rest...a bit more level-headedness and England limp {sic Lyon} to victory.

Looks like a max score of the first innings. If only Root, Crawley and Brook had put just runs of around 30 in England would get over the line.

A very very minor chance that tickling singles all the way till end of play with these two would bring a very unlikely win for England but as I have noted, and at no real discredit but Tongue and Anderson definitely aren't first class international batsman of any particular note.

This is where it's disappointing though, is because Australia clearly are quite beatable. With no Lyon now, England really have to reassess their batting strategy slightly and win the Third Test.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 14:53:29
I've been out and just tuned in, fair fucks to Stokes. Sounds like there may have been a few talking points!

Shame the series isn't going to be 1-1 because in everything apart from the results it's been a stone cold classic so far.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 15:05:05
I've been out and just tuned in, fair fucks to Stokes. Sounds like there may have been a few talking points!

Shame the series isn't going to be 1-1 because in everything apart from the results it's been a stone cold classic so far.

The margins have been very, very fine.

As I type it’s all over


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Berniman on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 15:07:10
I am no Cricket expert but why does Tongue bat like he is playing baseball?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 15:11:16
I'm sure the talk will be that they would have definitely won had it not been for the Bairstow decision, however my opinion is that without it, Stokes wouldn't have cut loose and the margin of defeat would have been greater.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: DMC on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 15:36:47
I know everyone keeps saying it's about building partnerships but still don't get why theres just shit batsman at the end of the running order. Surely a better batsman at the end there gives them a better chance


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 15:39:24
I know everyone keeps saying it's about building partnerships but still don't get why theres just shit batsman at the end of the running order. Surely a better batsman at the end there gives them a better chance

If a team only needs one wicket to win, it’s normally no good having a good batter one end and a poor one the other, because the chances are the poor one won’t take long to get out, therefore, good batter wont face many balls anyway, so have much chance to score.

Does that make sense? 


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 15:39:32
I know everyone keeps saying it's about building partnerships but still don't get why theres just shit batsman at the end of the running order. Surely a better batsman at the end there gives them a better chance

If you can find four people who can bowl well and bat then great, but it's a bloody rare skill to be good at both.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: DMC on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 15:59:50
It makes sense but in my thick as shit mind i still think having at least 1 who is decent at the end would have given them a chance wouldn't it today. The minute it was just the 3 left it was game over, a half decent batter would have given them a chance ... No ?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 16:09:17
It makes sense but in my thick as shit mind i still think having at least 1 who is decent at the end would have given them a chance wouldn't it today. The minute it was just the 3 left it was game over, a half decent batter would have given them a chance ... No ?

The batters are only out when they personally are out, not the pair, so a good batter can often be left towards the end (as Stokes was today).

You do see the sort of thing you're describing sometimes with night watchmen (basically, they throw a rubbish batter they don't mind getting out in when there are like 10 minutes left in a day and the real batters don't fancy it because it's dark or something) and it broadly doesn't seem to change much.

There are one or two recorded cases of "reversing the batting order" i.e. sending in the shit ones first in very specific circumstances, but you do look silly if you end up with a Joe Root or whoever not out when the other ten wickets have been lost.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 16:09:45
It makes sense but in my thick as shit mind i still think having at least 1 who is decent at the end would have given them a chance wouldn't it today. The minute it was just the 3 left it was game over, a half decent batter would have given them a chance ... No ?

But a lot of the time, a half decent batter would have still been at the crease anyway. We had 6 batters in our team this test, 1 all rounder and 4 bowlers. You’d hope one of them could still be around at the end of an innings.
Having another batter coming in at 10 or 11 wouldn’t be any benefit as he wouldn’t have much time to score.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 16:13:31
Just seen the Bairstow thing back. Dozy as fuck from Bairstow. I assume umpires call over in international cricket the same way I would umpiring in club cricket.

It's not great from the Aussies particularly but I don't think it's worth the sheer amount of anger there seems to be.

Real Schrodinger's Ashes this one - my point of view is we've had two tightly contested, entertaining games with England playing much closer to the Aussies than their "true" level but I can also see the argument where we've lost two games, one against Australia with Smith & Marnus making 38 runs in the match and us declaring an innings, and the second where the Aussies had 10 men. Pick your own adventure I guess.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 16:17:25
In his mid 20's Broad was quite handy with the bat

Despite being known for his bowling prowess, Stuart Broad scored a superb 169 while batting at nine during England's first-innings versus Pakistan in 2010.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 16:18:28
In his mid 20's Broad was quite handy with the bat

Despite being known for his bowling prowess, Stuart Broad scored a superb 169 while batting at nine during England's first-innings versus Pakistan in 2010.

That was in the spot fixing game, so append your own asterisk to that...

But yes, he was a very decent batter. Then he got half his teeth broken by Varun Aaron and he's never been the same against the short ball since.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 16:27:07
That was in the spot fixing game, so append your own asterisk to that...

But yes, he was a very decent batter. Then he got half his teeth broken by Varun Aaron and he's never been the same against the short ball since.

Fair point but can't deny he used to be a decent batsman.

All kicking off at the end with the members.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 16:28:38
Fair point but can't deny he used to be a decent batsman.

All kicking off at the end with the members.

That was at lunch, not after.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 16:29:26
That was at lunch, not after.

Apologies didn't know that


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 16:30:17
I think Jimmy needs resting for the Headingly test, he wasn’t been at his best at all. Would like to see Mark Wood come in for him.
Moeen, if fit, will surely come back in too? So do you drop Broad or Robinson? As Tongue has done enough to stay in for me.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 16:32:40
Easiest thing in the world is to pick the right team for the last test. Wait and see what the pitch is. If Wood and Ali are fit it certainly leaves us with options.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 16:37:49
Jimmy Anderson will be 41 at the end of the month, sadly age catching up with him and not the player he once was.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 17:47:16
As much as it pains me, Jimmy hasn't been good enough and needs dropping. Give him a rest and bring him back for Old Trafford.

Broad is always good for a few wickets so I'd keep him in. Wood needs to play if he's fit enough.

And after today's shennanigans, Foakes must be eagerly waiting by the phone, surely?!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 18:12:03
.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zO3fx1aT4RQ&t=579s


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Mooneyraker on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 19:17:32
.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zO3fx1aT4RQ&t=579s

Watching that, I think he knows he’s done the wrong thing.

Bairstow was a mug but it was absolutely shabby captaincy.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 19:22:16
Agree no integrity


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 20:41:39
I would have called him back. He wasn’t trying to gain an advantage and he obviously thought it was a dead ball and ‘over’.

I’d hate to have to do something like that to win.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: MangoRed on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 21:13:28
Fuck all wrong with it in my opinion. Wonders out of his crease and got stumped- https://twitter.com/samdjodan/status/1675575411344908288?s=46&t=ogDLXJ96cK_WBQahaJzdyg happened with Bairstow in aus innings and exact same thing with Colin DeGrandhomme for NZ in that series. The game is the game, win at all costs. People are far too selective of when they wanna be all soft and mushy with the sport about respecting the spirit but when it’s be a Shithouse IE Robinson telling Khawaja to fuck off after getting something like 150 - it’s good on him into him Ollie!

Stokes is incredible, nobody else in the world like him.

Bigger picture is 2-0 down on home turf, Aus are the ones who have had to bat mostly in gloomy conditions, all at sea against new ball yesterday with Starc. Winning 3 test matches is alot of work. Bazball approach is fine but there has to be a line.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, July 2, 2023, 22:56:32
I think Jimmy needs resting for the Headingly test, he wasn’t been at his best at all. Would like to see Mark Wood come in for him.
Moeen, if fit, will surely come back in too? So do you drop Broad or Robinson? As Tongue has done enough to stay in for me.

I think from a combined point of view, you keep Broad in. He stayed at the crease for a good couple of hours and was every bit beneficial in doing his job to allow Stokes to do his - would have like a few more runs from him. We know he can turn it on with the ball as well. Robinson has more tests in him probably but right now I think Broad just edges ahead.

Wood still might not be fully fit though and whilst it's clear England need him, Headingley might be one Test too soon... tricky :hmmm:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Mooneyraker on Monday, July 3, 2023, 07:10:16
Fuck all wrong with it in my opinion. Wonders out of his crease and got stumped- https://twitter.com/samdjodan/status/1675575411344908288?s=46&t=ogDLXJ96cK_WBQahaJzdyg happened with Bairstow in aus innings and exact same thing with Colin DeGrandhomme for NZ in that series. The game is the game, win at all costs. People are far too selective of when they wanna be all soft and mushy with the sport about respecting the spirit but when it’s be a Shithouse IE Robinson telling Khawaja to fuck off after getting something like 150 - it’s good on him into him Ollie!

Stokes is incredible, nobody else in the world like him.

Bigger picture is 2-0 down on home turf, Aus are the ones who have had to bat mostly in gloomy conditions, all at sea against new ball yesterday with Starc. Winning 3 test matches is alot of work. Bazball approach is fine but there has to be a line.

He doesn’t get stumped as the keeper isn’t holding the ball. He gets run out… when not attempting a run. Unlike De Grandhomme, who was.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Monday, July 3, 2023, 08:06:01
I think Jimmy needs resting for the Headingly test, he wasn’t been at his best at all. Would like to see Mark Wood come in for him.
Moeen, if fit, will surely come back in too? So do you drop Broad or Robinson? As Tongue has done enough to stay in for me.

Robinson and Anderson out, Wood and Ali in for me.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, July 3, 2023, 08:23:05
He doesn’t get stumped as the keeper isn’t holding the ball. He gets run out… when not attempting a run. Unlike De Grandhomme, who was.

Stumped on the scorecard.

I know people like arguing, but it's a bit sad for my money that Ben Stokes scoring 155 has basically not been commented on in the mass moralising. What an innings in the circumstances.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Mooneyraker on Monday, July 3, 2023, 08:31:33
Stumped on the scorecard.

I know people like arguing, but it's a bit sad for my money that Ben Stokes scoring 155 has basically not been commented on in the mass moralising. What an innings in the circumstances.

That is what it says on the scorecard yes.

Stokes and certainly Broad seemed to be fired up by the incident so perhaps we wouldn't have had that innings without it. He was playing angry for sure, as shown when he launched his bat!

Broad taking the moral high ground was good viewing yesterday, but his non-walk a few years ago when he hit the ball was just as abject.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Abrahammer on Monday, July 3, 2023, 14:30:30
Fuck all wrong with it in my opinion. Wonders out of his crease and got stumped- https://twitter.com/samdjodan/status/1675575411344908288?s=46&t=ogDLXJ96cK_WBQahaJzdyg happened with Bairstow in aus innings and exact same thing with Colin DeGrandhomme for NZ in that series. The game is the game, win at all costs. People are far too selective of when they wanna be all soft and mushy with the sport about respecting the spirit but when it’s be a Shithouse IE Robinson telling Khawaja to fuck off after getting something like 150 - it’s good on him into him Ollie!


This

Sport is about winning, everything else is off secondary importance


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Monday, July 3, 2023, 14:49:22
This

Sport is about winning, everything else is off secondary importance
Bet your kids loved playing games with you!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Abrahammer on Monday, July 3, 2023, 14:52:11
Think Competitive Dad from The Fast Show


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Monday, July 3, 2023, 15:02:14
'Go on san, hit the ball...no not like that, like this...HIT ITTTT. Omg you're completely useless - here I'll show you how it's done.'

I love the final ever sketch of ''Competitive Dad'' - basically the son tells him why he is as competitive as he is.

==================

You see a lot of sideline parents like this...living their failed dreams through their kids to the point of shocking pressure and eventual resentment in later life from said kids...especially if they don't quite make it or just don't really enjoy whatever it is they've been pressured to do.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Mr Stevens on Monday, July 3, 2023, 15:27:31
I think they should go back to how we used to play. If you shout "in" at any time, that's the law.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, July 4, 2023, 10:56:27
Pope and Lyon both out of the series.

Expect England to put Lawrence in as a straight swap.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Tuesday, July 4, 2023, 11:04:16
Pope and Lyon both out of the series.

Expect England to put Lawrence in as a straight swap.

Surely you bring in Foakes and push Bairstow up. I don’t think they will though.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: swindon74 on Tuesday, July 4, 2023, 13:10:03
Surely you bring in Foakes and push Bairstow up. I don’t think they will though.

This really is the sensible option, Bairstow has been absolute dross with the gloves! But unfortunately it won’t happen


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Tuesday, July 4, 2023, 19:33:31
Duckett
Crawley
Brook
Root
Stokes
Bairstow
Ali
Woakes
Broad
Robinson
Wood

Team for Thursday supposedly, according to Sky.

Harsh on Tounge.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, July 5, 2023, 10:22:56
Confirmed as that team. I assume they didn't fancy Tongue for back-to-back games, he's had a lot of injury issues. Attack feels more balanced with Wood and Ali, but it's an awful lot of hit and miss batters.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: swindon74 on Wednesday, July 5, 2023, 11:41:25
That’s a a 400+ team or 88 all out kind of team


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 09:13:13
Looks like the Aussies have dropped Green, which is a big call. Mitch Marsh in along with Todd Murphy and Boland back too.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Laddy in Red on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 09:39:20
Winning the toss hasn't helped previously, 3rd time lucky hopefully. Bowling first, let's hope for some day one swing.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 09:55:37
Looks like the Aussies have dropped Green, which is a big call. Mitch Marsh in along with Todd Murphy and Boland back too.

Green has an injury


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 09:58:44
Winning the toss hasn't helped previously, 3rd time lucky hopefully. Bowling first, let's hope for some day one swing.

Pitch looks belting, think this is a "if this is going to do anything, it'll be early on" type choice to bowl first, rather than a 200 par one.

As I type, Broad nicks off Warner, lovely stuff.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 10:32:47
God I missed Mark Wood. So much fun. 93mph outswingers, good luck lads.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: DMC on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 10:33:43
My app has gone down, anyone have sky go i could borrow for a hour or so


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 10:39:19
Wood sending down thunderbolts. He’s been sorely missed


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 11:47:32
For fuck's sake Jonny. Dropped Head and Smith now.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Berniman on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 11:51:36
Smith gone - big wicket that


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 11:52:59
Smith gone - big wicket that

Was sure that was thigh pad until snicko came up! Think it might have been inside edge onto thigh pad through to the keeper.

This is so well poised pitch wise - pitch has pace and carry, outfield is lightning. 100/4 sessions are going to be Aus standard... England might be 200/5 off a few!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 13:28:55
Root should have had that. If I was Stokes I'd say something along the lines of 'hey man, next time, rather than drop it, catch it instead.'

That'll encourage him to do better


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Laddy in Red on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 14:16:34
Expensive drops. Not going to win the ashes when fielding like a pub team.

Otherwise a decent performance, Wood's spell captivating.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 14:19:06
Marshball. Reckon that was probably a good pick in hindsight...

Ultimately though if you drop Aussie 4, 5 and 6 in the same innings, things aren't going to go well for you.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 14:20:49
Did we put a village side out after lunch without anyone noticing?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: adje on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 14:22:27
Yeah,but Bazball don't do catching!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 14:35:54
Thank fuck for that.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 15:18:46
Roaring back into it now. Back and forth game this.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 15:43:20
Very good fightback by England & Wood in particular. Game on.

Need to take those chances when they come though.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 16:12:01
Based on the opening couple of overs from the Aussies, 200 or so may be a good score!  I think that post Tea session was necessary to keep us in the game.  This looks like the sort of wicket we'd be skittled for 120 odd a couple of years ago.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: harrisonaw on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 16:33:39
Based on the opening couple of overs from the Aussies, 200 or so may be a good score!  I think that post Tea session was necessary to keep us in the game.  This looks like the sort of wicket we'd be skittled for 120 odd a couple of years ago.

Or even today :)


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RedRag on Thursday, July 6, 2023, 18:57:59
The fat fuck's keeping has been costing us time and time again. 

The Foakes v Bairstow selection choice was being played out in the media, aided by Bairstow regularly bigging up his desire for a recall, well before selection for the first test.  Whilst the blameless incumbent Foakes just kept his head down and got on with his game.

Foakes v Bairstow was the wrong Q in any event.  And Rob Key and Stokes looked unprofessional in choosing the comfortable "old boys" convenience route of Jonny (not to mention the undroppable Crawley). 

Sadly it seems Stokes can't bowl now so, tbf, it looks like the selectors now have to make us endure village cricket keeping where the old guy never has his gloves taken off him.

Lets hope Jonny stands and delivers tomorrow.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 7, 2023, 10:02:08
Well that's not an ideal start to the morning. Aussies are taking their catches, it's going to be the difference here unless Stokes does Stokes things.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 7, 2023, 10:22:17
Is it really within the spirit of cricket for Australia to catch everything? I wouldn't want to win that way.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Friday, July 7, 2023, 10:24:56
Case point number 45 this series as to why Foakes should be in the team over Bairstow


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Friday, July 7, 2023, 10:25:22
Based on the opening couple of overs from the Aussies, 200 or so may be a good score!  I think that post Tea session was necessary to keep us in the game.  This looks like the sort of wicket we'd be skittled for 120 odd a couple of years ago.

May be today too


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 7, 2023, 10:26:38
Case point number 45 this series as to why Foakes should be in the team over Bairstow

He should, but Bairstow is not alone in having very low standards catching. For all the athletic brilliant stops, England drop a lot of catches across the side.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Friday, July 7, 2023, 10:29:46
He should, but Bairstow is not alone in having very low standards catching. For all the athletic brilliant stops, England drop a lot of catches across the side.

The main reason Bairstow was put in over Foakes was because of his batting, and he’s been poor other than the first innings.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, July 7, 2023, 10:42:39
Bairstow was phenomenal last summer, but if he’s not scoring runs he should be out of the team for Foakes who should score at least as many runs but not drop the ball


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Friday, July 7, 2023, 10:53:47
Taking their catches has been the biggest difference between the two teams so far.

Bairstow (whilst probably the biggest) is not the only culprit here.

As for this game, you have to think England need to get another 100 or so to keep themselves in the game


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Friday, July 7, 2023, 11:11:03
Bairstow was phenomenal last summer, but if he’s not scoring runs he should be out of the team for Foakes who should score at least as many runs but not drop the ball
The problem with Bairstow is similar to that with Alec Stewart a few years ago.

England want him to be a top Test batsman and a top Test wicket keeper - He is neither. He is an all rounder. A number 6 batsman who can be a bit hit or miss. As a wicket keeper, he is a stopper who is prone to mistakes.

As with Alec Stewart, who was nowhere near the keeper Jack Russell was, he is being asked to do a job that is very difficult. Batting early after keeping wicket for a couple of days isn't easy.

P.S. Another problem is that Foakes is half the keeper that Jack Russell was! He's good, but he isn't great! On the batting side, he is less of a batsman than Bairstow (who is less of a batsman than Stewart was)


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RedRag on Friday, July 7, 2023, 11:33:59
 :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:
Is it really within the spirit of cricket for Australia to catch everything? I wouldn't want to win that way.
:clap:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Friday, July 7, 2023, 12:04:19
Not really sure what that session was. Stokes and Ali looked to be batting “proper test match batting.” Ali got away with one then decided to hit it straight to the fielder that got moved there next ball. Woakes trying to swing at everything just before lunch. Completely brain dead cricket


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: swindon74 on Friday, July 7, 2023, 12:24:25
This is just such brain dead cricket! Bairstow, Ali and woakes all pathetic dismissals! 13 dropped catches!? 0 fight in this team


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Friday, July 7, 2023, 12:46:34
This is just such brain dead cricket! Bairstow, Ali and woakes all pathetic dismissals! 13 dropped catches!? 0 fight in this team

Bazball is Bayliss-ball with more stupid shots


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Friday, July 7, 2023, 12:48:19
Mark Wood is ace.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Friday, July 7, 2023, 12:56:14
Looks like Stokes has realised it's time to just go for it as a one man team again at this stage. Although he's with Broad again so maybe they can frustrate the Aussies a little longer - keep Stokes on strike and Broad can tickle away a few singles whilst Stokes thrashes it about for an hour.

I'll be impressed if England get to 250 from here. But as been stated - catches win matches.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 7, 2023, 12:58:16
Mark Wood is ace.

to "catches win matches" add "if you're gonna swing, swing hard" to the village cliches that are still true for the pros list!

Fuck me they've dropped one!

Ben Stokes is turning into Boromir here, getting increasingly injured and still whacking people right left and centre. If he plays all five tests it'll be a miracle.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Friday, July 7, 2023, 13:00:59
Stokes dropped twice in 2 balls.

Luvverly!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 7, 2023, 13:05:16
And then Broad not dropped. Every England wicket so far has been caught, and six of Australia's ten (plus three major drops).


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 7, 2023, 13:21:56
I do feel like Stokes is the absolute opposite of what Ian Bell was (perhaps unfairly) accused of being. He absolutely only scores runs when England really, really need them. Injured players at both ends now!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Friday, July 7, 2023, 13:28:55
I guess 250 was not a bad score afterall


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Friday, July 7, 2023, 13:30:56
Well that could have been a lot lot worse. Kept it interesting.

Please just take your fucking chances now, England.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Friday, July 7, 2023, 13:32:19
At one point (87-5) it looked like England could be all out for well less than 200 so this keeps them in the game.

With both Stokes & Robinson unlikely to bowl there’s going to be a lot of pressure on the other bowlers. Will be interesting to see how many overs the spinners get to bowl


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Friday, July 7, 2023, 13:35:17
Would liked to have seen Stokes get a ton. He deserved it as the only fella really out there trying to make anything of it when he has to. You can see he's trying to play test cricket at the outset but no one to really support him so he has to revert to one-dayer mode to get some runs on the board for England.

Wood has been good value with the bat considering he's bottom order. Expected a little more from Broad and Woakes. Ali did ok for a bottom order bat playing almost middle order too. The top order really need to sort their mentality out. They are clearly trying to only play Bazball when it really doesn't fully suit them. IF the selectors want aggressive play then they may as well select Dawad Malan in place of Brook, who has been poor. All the top order have been pretty poor/inconsistent.

Root is meant to be your linchpin and is not delivering this series so far. If he's still in when someone like Stokes comes in to bat then you have a great chance to build a partnership. I still think Root needs to ignore any Bazball approach and just play his own game.

But when you look at both innings, they are pretty similar in terms of batting quality. Marsh was their standout with Head the next best, the rest were poor in both top orders. The only pattern is both sides got progressively better as it approached the middle order. What bizarrely is notable that after MO their middle to bottom got progressively worse {as expected} but only scored 23 with two ducks. England however, whilst following a similar pattern - their middle to bottom achieved 67.

So the only stand outs really were Marsh and Stokes. with about 35 runs difference. England trail by just 26 runs. If they can improve their top order a bit AND get Root to play his traditional game then England would be matching and bettering the Aussies totals in every innings.

Oh and if they could learn to catch as well then from a fielding POV - England might then also increase their chances. I don't think it's down to a lack of quality or being able to match Australia - they aren't really that great themselves. I feel like it's more indiscipline with the bat/fielding and all players trying to play a style that clearly doesn't suit all of them.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Friday, July 7, 2023, 13:40:50
This is just such brain dead cricket! Bairstow, Ali and woakes all pathetic dismissals! 13 dropped catches!? 0 fight in this team

Two years ago it was abundantly clear that we had a team, bar one player, that could not bat in Test matches.  There was much gnashing of teeth about the fact the short form game had become complete King and we'd lost all our Test match talent as a result.

The master stroke of the current approach is we've sort of accepted that - you can't develop Test batsmen over night.  Instead, we've essentially asked 11 players to play One Day when batting, and backed that up by bowling for wickets and trying to ensure every game is a win or loss situation - no hanging on for draws or wasting time building scores.  That has made us competitive again-  because other teams will not risk joining in when they have built Test teams.

If we went back to Test batting, or took our foot off the peddle a little on the One Day approach, we'd have been skittled in our innings.  We'd probably have faced as many balls but been out for 120-150, because the Aussie bowlers are pretty good and our batsmen do not have the technique to survive.  By pushing on, you make the bowler think about their game more, you introduce doubt.

Essentially, we've turned the worst batting Test team (maybe bar the Windies) into one that can get close to the best.  We have retained a fairly good bowling attack, so the two combine to make this series almost a toss-up, almost.  The Aussies are still a lot better than us, so will have an innings here and there that they just get too much for us, or an innings here and there where they outsmart the one day batting.

Maybe in a year or two, a couple of hybrid batsmen develop - able to be more Root when needed.

How many of our batsmen have 40+ averages, two?  If we can get a couple more of those mixed in, then you can have the ability to go at five, but maybe settle in from time to time when it's needed to stretch an innings out.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, July 7, 2023, 13:40:58
Ben Stokes is a phenom.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Friday, July 7, 2023, 13:41:09

Please just take your fucking chances now, England.


You just know they won't though. Not at present indiscipline. The only players turning it on at the mo is Stokes with the bat and in this test, Wood is probably our best shot at skittling the Aussies. Although we can't make a spinner {one still not quite fully fit to boot} bowl all afternoon shirley?  :hmmm:

Was going to go to this but really could not justify the eighty quid per resale ticket at present playing standard or an entry ticket at twenny five quid for a pointless day five. I might go to Chesterfield instead and watch some cricket there  :D


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Saxondale on Friday, July 7, 2023, 14:02:40
Went yesterday and had a lovely day.  13 wickets, a ton and a 5 wicket haul.  Perfectly pleasant.  But I have realised that the only thing wrong with going to an ashes match is the aussie supporters.  Really whiny annoying twats.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Friday, July 7, 2023, 14:22:59
Went yesterday and had a lovely day.  13 wickets, a ton and a 5 wicket haul.  Perfectly pleasant.  But I have realised that the only thing wrong with going to an ashes match is the aussie supporters.  Really whiny annoying twats.

Headingley is always alright and had I got in early at cheaper prices then fine but not at 80 notes for a bog standard seat unfortunately. That was at the lower end of pricing too. Saw England at the Oval last Autumn One Dayers for 20 quid and the following final day for a tenner, which then got refunded as it was done inside an hour  :)


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Friday, July 7, 2023, 16:13:00
In with a sniff. Aus 72-3


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Friday, July 7, 2023, 16:41:09
It could end up a three day test match😀


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 7, 2023, 16:41:36
I'd be very nervous if I was sat on Day 4 tickets!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Friday, July 7, 2023, 16:45:13
Same here! I wonder if the ground staff will get a bollocking if it is over tomorrow.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Friday, July 7, 2023, 16:55:05
I thought the forecast for tomorrow was very wet, that might drag it on a bit (pardon the pun)


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, July 7, 2023, 18:18:35
Well that's not an ideal start to the morning. Aussies are taking their catches, it's going to be the difference here unless Stokes does Stokes things.

...and that he did.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, July 8, 2023, 16:32:54
England slight favourites. Need to keep the chase below 200


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 8, 2023, 16:40:08
England slight favourites. Need to keep the chase below 200

I hope we don't get to bat this evening


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, July 8, 2023, 17:13:39
Aussies smacking it around between wickets!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 8, 2023, 17:15:20
Bowl them out end the end of play today leaving two days of conservative cricket to chase under 250😀


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 8, 2023, 18:00:04
251 to win then!
Don't go gung ho 2 days and a bit to get them😀


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 8, 2023, 18:07:23
Got lucky with the conditions there but sets up a cracking day 4. Hope England win to keep the series alive as much as anything else, it's been a much better series than 3-0.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: swindon74 on Saturday, July 8, 2023, 18:08:22
If we can chip away, and get ourselves 40-50 runs without losing a wicket, then I will start to believe


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 8, 2023, 18:18:19
Have they announced how many overs are left to bowl this evening


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: tans on Saturday, July 8, 2023, 18:25:43
Have they announced how many overs are left to bowl this evening

5 overs in total


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Saturday, July 8, 2023, 18:27:39
Steady start that.

Tomorrow will be a good day


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 8, 2023, 18:28:16
5 overs in total

Thanks :D


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, July 8, 2023, 18:42:00
Perfect start. 50s for both openers and we’ve got this. Imagine going into the go might test with the ashes on the line. I’m erect


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Saturday, July 8, 2023, 18:52:40
Crawley confuses the shit out of me.

He has all the shots, looks a classy player at times yet only averages 28.

I think we are correct to persist though. Only 25 and there's hardly a queue of openers is there?



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 10:17:08
Moeen in as the er... MorningHawk?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: MangoRed on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 10:20:06
Crawley confuses the shit out of me.

He has all the shots, looks a classy player at times yet only averages 28.

I think we are correct to persist though. Only 25 and there's hardly a queue of openers is there?



Gone through so many openers, he got chucked in the deep end at 21 when there was a massive transitional phase- I think he’s quality


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 10:36:13
Moeen in as the er... MorningHawk?

Mohawk (pinched from TMS)


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 10:40:37
Whoops. Come on England. No excuse not to chase this


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 11:13:01
Whoops. Come on England. No excuse not to chase this

Not sure about that, would be the biggest score of the match in the fourth innings. It's chaseable, but 50:50 at best.

And as I write that Crawley nicks off.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 11:14:10
Yeah, tough ask.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 11:56:25
I still think England will win, Australia are about 40/50 runs short


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 12:01:09
A wicket just before lunch is not good. Get the next two out quickly in the afternoon session then we become weak so still finely in the balance.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 12:13:34
Under 100 to win now with 6 wickets remaining....don't mess it up😀

Was there a delayed start as lunch is normally 13.00


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 12:15:21
Under 100 to win now with 6 wickets remaining....don't mess it up😀

Was there a delayed start as lunch is normally 13.00

Making up play lost yesterday.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 12:34:09
Shouldn't really lose from this position. If Stokes puts in another 5O+ then the other 5 can scramble another 5O between them. That's without Brook scoring any more runs - who looks like he was getting on strike nicely. Seems to have done him good to drop him down the order a smidge.

Crawley and Duckett....meh, still need improvement for openers but Crawley better this time around. Ali kinda sacrificed this morning but you want him fit for Manchester so a cameo with the bat is ok...especially if it takes pressure off someone like Brook. He's looking like a bit more of a hybrid player today and that's fine. Maybe Root needs to drop down the order a little too? Poss start him at 5 but he really needs to start performing in this series.

There is caution as JQ mentions but really, less than a ton needed with potentially day and a half of cricket but there's no reason why this can't be completed by the end of play today - either way.

Would be nice to cruise to victory with both Brook and Stokes at the helm - but that wouldn't be very England. I see England losing Brook for about 6O, Stokes going into T2O Powerplay mode and finishing N/O on 5O+, with the remainder getting an average of about 7 runs each. Unless Broad fancies a defensive partnership role with Stokes again. See the match out on about  1O runs, whilst Stokes slaps a few 6s around and finishes on about 8O runs.

Predict One:
England win with two or poss three wickets remaining - most likely two

Predict Two:
England lose by something silly like 12 runs


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 12:48:48
Shouldn't really lose from this position. If Stokes puts in another 5O+ then the other 5 can scramble another 5O between them. That's without Brook scoring any more runs - who looks like he was getting on strike nicely. Seems to have done him good to drop him down the order a smidge.

Crawley and Duckett....meh, still need improvement for openers but Crawley better this time around. Ali kinda sacrificed this morning but you want him fit for Manchester so a cameo with the bat is ok...especially if it takes pressure off someone like Brook. He's looking like a bit more of a hybrid player today and that's fine. Maybe Root needs to drop down the order a little too? Poss start him at 5 but he really needs to start performing in this series.

There is caution as JQ mentions but really, less than a ton needed with potentially day and a half of cricket but there's no reason why this can't be completed by the end of play today - either way.

Would be nice to cruise to victory with both Brook and Stokes at the helm - but that wouldn't be very England. I see England losing Brook for about 6O, Stokes going into T2O Powerplay mode and finishing N/O on 5O+, with the remainder getting an average of about 7 runs each. Unless Broad fancies a defensive partnership role with Stokes again. See the match out on about  1O runs, whilst Stokes slaps a few 6s around and finishes on about 8O runs.

Predict One:
England win with two or poss three wickets remaining - most likely two

Predict Two:
England lose by something silly like 12 runs
The batters that are left are swishers - Capable of scoring quickly but equally capable of being skittled! I’m hoping for the best but preparing for the worst!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 13:03:08
90 to win 5 wickets remaining!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 13:03:38
As I said!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 13:12:44
Gulp!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 13:13:12
Oh heck. Jonny owed us a few runs as well. Over to you Cherrington, make yourself a hero.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 13:17:48
As I said!

Yupp. Stokes will be disappointed with that. Bairstow needs to be dropped. Woakes needs to put in what Bairstow hasn't with the bat to help Brook out.

Failing that, only Broad would be capable of staying out there for a couple of hours now. Down to Brook really to do a Stokes and get a ton. Otherwise England lose.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 13:19:27
We need to play 1980's slow boring Test cricket to get over the winning line. No need for any heroics.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nick Bamosomi on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 13:20:04
Bairstow has been an all round disaster this series.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 13:23:42
We need to play 1980's slow boring Test cricket to get over the winning line. No need for any heroics.

Other than Brooks, we haven't really got anyone else left to bat who can do that. It's a One Day/Test hybrid side. I think it'll bear fruits eventually but right now they need to play a bit more Test style than One Dayer.

If England limp to a win now, it'll be down to individual heroics. This time it's down to Brook. He goes and England are fooked.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 13:25:19
Bairstow has been an all round disaster this series.

Absolutely, he didn't even seem up for it amongst the Leeds/Bradford faithful. Which is very poor in effectively your home Test


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 13:25:50
Other than Brooks, we haven't really got anyone else left to bat who can do that. It's a One Day/Test hybrid side. I think it'll bear fruits eventually but right now they need to play a bit more Test style than One Dayer.

If England limp to a win now, it'll be down to individual heroics. This time it's down to Brook. He goes and England are fooked.

It's still finely balanced, as long as Brooks stays in we should be ok but you just never know when your playing against the Aussies😆


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 14:02:56
Highest partnership of the innings here. Woakes doing great work. Think there's still a twist to come... one wicket win?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: swindon74 on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 14:03:41
I won’t be comfortable until it’s 20 runs needed with 4 wickets in hand!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 14:11:23
I'm definitely more optimistic now😀


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nick Bamosomi on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 14:11:42
I’ll start believing when it’s 10 runs needed!!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 14:12:01
Brave move to bring the spinner on. By which I think I mean crazy...


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 14:12:26
‘Shit Harry Potter. You’re just a shit Harry Potter’


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 14:17:05
Shit shit shit shit shit


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nick Bamosomi on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 14:17:58
Shit shit shit shit shit

Indeed


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 14:18:08
We should be ok with 3 wickets remaining🤣


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 14:22:32
Why the fuck can’t they just tip and run


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 14:23:54
Yeah. Just like that!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 14:30:17
Never in doubt, this.
Absolutely cruising to victory.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 14:33:36
Beautiful stuff. Well done Wood and Woakes. What a series this is.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nick Bamosomi on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 14:33:41
What a hero Mark Wood has been.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 14:34:58
Brilliant win keeps things interesting!
Crazy, excluding the rain delay it was a 3 day test match.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 14:38:55
Bairstow has to be dropped now for the next 2 tests.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 14:47:00
Bairstow has to be dropped now for the next 2 tests.

Yup. He’s too far out of form even for Bazball


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 14:47:11
Bairstow has to be dropped now for the next 2 tests.
Who you going to bring in? You need a batsman wicketkeeper because there are too few specialist batsmen in the side and too many all rounders.

You’d have to go with Butler, but he ain’t that great behind the stumps. If you bring in Foakes you’d need to consider dropping Moeen. It wouldn’t surprise me if they swapped him for Lawrence (who I don’t rate).

Or, you stick with the same team.



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Robinz on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 15:06:04
So how do you drop Jimmy Anderson for the Old Trafford test ???



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: swindon74 on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 15:08:52
I would rarther play Woakes instead of Anderson. Woakes let’s us bat deeper and is arguably in better form then Jimmy!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Robinz on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 15:16:57
Agreed... my point is possibly Jimmy Andersons last home test especially at Old Trafford and an Ashes test as well.
A selectors nightmare.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: swindon74 on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 15:20:35
Yer true, that’s a good point, forgot old Trafford is his home ground, a tricky one


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 15:23:30
Who you going to bring in? You need a batsman wicketkeeper because there are too few specialist batsmen in the side and too many all rounders.

You’d have to go with Butler, but he ain’t that great behind the stumps. If you bring in Foakes you’d need to consider dropping Moeen. It wouldn’t surprise me if they swapped him for Lawrence (who I don’t rate).

Or, you stick with the same team.



I’m bringing in Foakes.
He’s not the worst with the bat at all, and Bairstow has offered nothing with the bat other than his first innings at Edgebaston, which was before he had to do any keeping.
His record with the bat after keeping is awful.

Bairstows test batting average is 37
Foakes test batting average is 32

It’s a no brainer for me


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 15:25:20
Tongue will probably come back in as well. Expecting Broad to be rested, not sure if Brook will bat 3 again. Gonna be an interesting selection, but nine day gap so we'll see what happens.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 15:27:25
Robinson could be rested if his back is still bad next week.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 16:20:45
No room for sentiment really so I wouldn't draft Anderson back in just because it's his home Test. Woakes has done enough and was good value alongside Brooks...when Brooks went I was nervous but Woakes played well despite being unorthodox at times. Wood did what Broad usually does for a tail-ender and by that I mean does enough to allow the other batter to bat.

Predicted a win with two wickets spare so to do it with three in hand was nice. Brooks took the Stokes role today and shows it's better dropping him down the order a bit, I'd maybe put him four and Root five. But who would you put in to play three after Duckett and Crawley? Would it be cheeky to put Woakes in at three or maybe Stokes fancies jumping up the order from six?  :hmmm:

Old Trafford wicket might play very similar to Headingly and the outfield is greener so this Test could swing yet again in England's favour. I think this goes back to Oval with everything to play for.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 16:22:49
It's a shame in cricket you can't make substitutes!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 16:23:05
Robinson will be out and Anderson in.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 17:03:36
Robinson will be out and Anderson in.

Yup. And possibly Bairstow out and Foakes or Buttler (more likely the former) in.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Boy About Town on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 17:12:38
Yup. And possibly Bairstow out and Foakes or Buttler (more likely the former) in.

We need to be bold. No mistakes now chap. Win out to grab the Urn. We need not bottle tough but correct selections. I would keep Jimmy out and play Tongue.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 17:36:40
.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5oQ_PYKsKvU


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 19:07:22
No Lyon for the rest of the series could be the deciding factor So good at holding up an end, offering something different and using his experience to rest up the seam bowlers.

How much faith do OZ have in this Murphy? reluctant to use him today. Even when desperate for wickets.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 19:44:42
I think with Lyon in the team they would have won this Test.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Sunday, July 9, 2023, 19:46:03
I think with Lyon in the team they would have won this Test.

Difficult to argue with that.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, July 13, 2023, 18:54:49
Woakes and Wood out, Anderson and Lawrence in according to BBC.

Jimmy was always going to play at Old Trafford, but interesting that Lawrence has been picked over better bowlers. Perhaps we're expecting a lively pitch and need to bat a bit deeper?

And Bairstow persists. FFS.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, July 13, 2023, 18:58:32
Hang on a minute, I think I'm just reading this wrong. Just realised it's in alphabetical order and the gap from Root to Tongue is probably not indicative of the starting 11.

(https://scontent-lcy1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/359763465_657083216450302_2336380287552213902_n.jpg?_nc_cat=104&cb=99be929b-3346023f&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=a1XUPxQlXkMAX-cnF_s&_nc_ht=scontent-lcy1-1.xx&oh=00_AfA8cgKQ1Due_25IWZUuarhOiZ_5ffamxJ5vFzvGfP-U2Q&oe=64B4BD3E)


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, July 13, 2023, 19:03:34
Root at 11 would be a rogue choice to be fair.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, July 17, 2023, 08:57:11
Anderson in for Robinson, Moeen continues at 3.

I hope we get top form Anderson. Certainly the weather looks like it will suit him if they get on at all.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: ChalkyWhiteIsGod on Monday, July 17, 2023, 09:36:16
Hang on a minute, I think I'm just reading this wrong. Just realised it's in alphabetical order and the gap from Root to Tongue is probably not indicative of the starting 11.

Football lineups all seem to be announced by squad numbers now as well rather than position. Does my head in.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Monday, July 17, 2023, 09:38:45
England: Ben Duckett, Zak Crawley, Moeen Ali, Joe Root, Harry Brook, Ben Stokes (captain), Jonathan Bairstow, Chris Woakes, Mark Wood, Stuart Broad, James Anderson.

Moeen at 3 then


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Monday, July 17, 2023, 10:19:49
A pity that the women just missed out yesterday.
Good to watch.

Also a mention for Zomerzet winning the T20 Blast.
It's not all about big run chases.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, July 18, 2023, 19:00:40
Women's side tied their Ashes just now, very impressive effort against a historically dominant side - Australia had won 41 of their previous 42 ODIs and England won 2 of 3 to tie the series, losing the other one by three runs. Very well matched series.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Wednesday, July 19, 2023, 10:16:56
Aus 15-1


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Wednesday, July 19, 2023, 12:00:59
I enjoyed Warner's no-look walk.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Wednesday, July 19, 2023, 13:34:42
Another 1 or 2 before Tea please.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, July 19, 2023, 15:57:57
Jonny Bairstow takes a catch! Aussies 7 down and it's all coming together.

Lots of chat about it being a worldie, if I'm being grumpy it's only a great catch because his footwork is wrong, but I'll take it all the same.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Wednesday, July 19, 2023, 16:31:05
Jonny Bairstow takes a catch! Aussies 7 down and it's all coming together.

Lots of chat about it being a worldie, if I'm being grumpy it's only a great catch because his footwork is wrong, but I'll take it all the same.

Forecast for Saturday & Sunday may be the spoiler😡


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Saxondale on Wednesday, July 19, 2023, 16:44:00
Im going tomorrow.  Hopefully get a full day in.



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Wednesday, July 19, 2023, 17:42:14
Im going tomorrow.  Hopefully get a full day in.



Not bad tomorrow so hopefully England can pile the runs on


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, July 20, 2023, 13:02:25
Moeen and Crawley, the ultimate "this is beautiful but I have every expectation of this going horribly wrong any minute" partnership.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, July 20, 2023, 13:43:53
75 off the last ten overs. Enormous fun - Crawley is less than convincing and edging plenty, but he's riding the luck and can't argue with the results.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, July 20, 2023, 14:38:15
Obviously had a chat about the looming weather at lunch and decided to go for it. A lead of 100+ by stumps would be marvellous.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: oxonrobin on Thursday, July 20, 2023, 14:38:31
Immensely enjoyable session that.  :pint:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: ChalkyWhiteIsGod on Thursday, July 20, 2023, 14:39:37
Hope the weather doesn't fuck us on this test. Manchester rain incoming next few days


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Thursday, July 20, 2023, 15:14:34
Imagine Broad bowling in a team captained by Smith - the reviews would be gone in the first over.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, July 20, 2023, 16:37:33
Root gets an absolute grubber. Aussies will not like the look of that at all!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, July 20, 2023, 17:38:18
With Saturday and Sunday looking pretty dreary weather wise, tomorrow is a key day. Looks like we need to push for a big first innings lead by lunch then stick them in on a crumbling pitch and see if we can skittle through them.

Wishful thinking...


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Thursday, July 20, 2023, 18:26:02
Yeah, lead of 200 - 250 & look to bowl them out quickly or leave a minimal total to chase.
Haven't looked at the forecast so not sure how dire it is.
Australia batting with a defensive mindset, with an eye on the weather, might not be the best way to go for them.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Thursday, July 20, 2023, 19:20:35
Yet another fantastic day of cricket. What a series this has been. England would consider themselves to be in an extremely strong position if not for the forecast


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Thursday, July 20, 2023, 19:22:37
Root gets an absolute grubber. Aussies will not like the look of that at all!

The Root wicket almost seems like a blessing in disguise. He’d already done so much damage before going to an unplayable ball. The England bowlers will be creaming their jeans


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Friday, July 21, 2023, 07:49:56
Got to get enough play over the next 2 days. Having looked at the forecast I think the maximum we can expect is 5 sessions over 3 days. Need to get on with it when we get out to bat (200 run lead) and declare and hope we can get them out in 4 sessions or that the weather is better than forecasted!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 21, 2023, 07:51:26
Need to get on with it when we get out to bat

We do that every time we get out to bat!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Friday, July 21, 2023, 07:52:00
If a potential decider at the oval is ruined by the weather it would be a massive shame.

It would be the greatest ashes series of all time at 2-2.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, July 21, 2023, 07:52:01
When was the last time we beat them by an innings?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Friday, July 21, 2023, 07:52:57
We do that every time we get out to bat!

I was disappointed by Stokes and Brook last night weirdly enough - thought it was a great chance to get a 150+ run lead by close.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 21, 2023, 07:53:09
When was the last time we beat them by an innings?

2015 at Trent Bridge in *that* Broad game

https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/australia-tour-of-england-and-ireland-2015-743911/england-vs-australia-4th-investec-test-743969/full-scorecard


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Friday, July 21, 2023, 07:53:40
When was the last time we beat them by an innings?

2015 when we bowled them out for 60 odd I'd expect?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, July 21, 2023, 07:57:37
2015 at Trent Bridge in *that* Broad game

https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/australia-tour-of-england-and-ireland-2015-743911/england-vs-australia-4th-investec-test-743969/full-scorecard

Oh yes, how could I forget that.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Friday, July 21, 2023, 08:27:11
Not currently raining at Old Trafford....


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 21, 2023, 09:53:49
Fun fact - Zak Crawley scored only 87 fewer runs yesterday than he did in seven home tests vs South Africa, India and New Zealand last year in total. The ultimate feast or famine player.

Here we go then, strap in, it's going to be fun!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Friday, July 21, 2023, 11:25:40
With the forecast, why have we not tried to score quicker this morning?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Friday, July 21, 2023, 11:27:10
With the forecast, why have we not tried to score quicker this morning?

The old ball wasn’t coming on to the bat at all, it’s hard to score. Australia really are playing for a draw here.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 21, 2023, 11:52:44
With the forecast, why have we not tried to score quicker this morning?

We've scored 125 in a session when the Aussies have bowled 24 overs (well below the scheduled 30). I think Bazball may have raised the bar on what scoring quickly means, but this is quick!

24 overs in that session is scandalous by the way, it's pure time wasting with the weather closing in. I don't get as cross about over rates as some do, but they know exactly what they're doing there.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Friday, July 21, 2023, 11:55:55
Declare at lunch or bat on? 


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 21, 2023, 11:56:27
Bat on 20 minutes or so or until Bairstow is out, don't give their openers the lunch break to prepare to bat.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: oxonrobin on Friday, July 21, 2023, 12:13:27
We've scored 125 in a session when the Aussies have bowled 24 overs (well below the scheduled 30). I think Bazball may have raised the bar on what scoring quickly means, but this is quick!

24 overs in that session is scandalous by the way, it's pure time wasting with the weather closing in. I don't get as cross about over rates as some do, but they know exactly what they're doing there.

Agreed, but England typically bowl well below the scheduled rate as well. Though suspect they may find a way to speed up today!   ;)


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 21, 2023, 13:19:04
Jimmy Anderson charge-pulling Pat Cummins for four is my moment of the series so far. Glorious nonsense.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Friday, July 21, 2023, 13:24:33
loving this tail end


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, July 21, 2023, 13:31:16
[boycott]Shot.[/boycott]


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, July 21, 2023, 13:31:52
Jonny Bairstow, I called for you to be dropped. I'm sorry. I was stupid.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 21, 2023, 13:33:13
Johnny Bairstow, I called for you to be dropped. I'm sorry. I was stupid.

I think it's perfectly possible to think both that he shouldn't be keeping and that he should be in the team as a batter. How on earth you make that team work whilst Stokes can't bowl, I don't know. Anyway, enjoy the upside of Bairstow.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Friday, July 21, 2023, 13:40:43
Haha, the utter farce of running a single off a ball that went straight through to the keeper.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, July 21, 2023, 13:43:22
Bairstow is absolutely taking the piss out of Carey here.

Magnificent.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 21, 2023, 13:45:28
Aussies are absolutely gone mentally here, it'll take a hell of a team talk to stop them falling in a heap this afternoon I think.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Friday, July 21, 2023, 13:45:30
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

99 noooooooooooooo


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 21, 2023, 13:49:32
On balance, you'd have to say this game has gone rather well so far.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Boy About Town on Friday, July 21, 2023, 14:21:46
Jonny Bairstow, I called for you to be dropped. I'm sorry. I was stupid.

Showing your lack of understanding for the arts.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Friday, July 21, 2023, 14:50:37
Woody!!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Bogus Dave on Friday, July 21, 2023, 15:31:37
Batted an hour too long


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 21, 2023, 15:45:23
It's incredible how often we get these freeze frame either way catches.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Friday, July 21, 2023, 16:10:57
I thought it was out


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, July 21, 2023, 17:10:09
Showing your lack of understanding for the arts.

Not at all. I’m sure my reasoning was sound (I just can’t remember).

Knobhead.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, July 21, 2023, 17:13:50
Just watched the Warner dismissal and he looks very much like a man who has had a terrible series and is teetering on the brink of retirement. His body language for both Old Trafford dismissals was so telling


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Friday, July 21, 2023, 17:14:48
Head heading back to the shed 😁😁


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, July 21, 2023, 17:15:18
When was the last time we beat them by an innings?

It's happening...


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, July 21, 2023, 17:19:47
It's happening...

Looking that way. They are all at sea, and surely it can’t rain for two entire days straight, even in Manchester?

If on Sunday there has been no play, I apologise yet again.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Friday, July 21, 2023, 17:31:59
Looks like tomorrow is going to be a washout, fingers crossed for Sunday


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 21, 2023, 20:18:29
I can see why people look at us getting four wickets in 40 overs and think if we'd declared 20 overs earlier we'd have six, but I don't think we should underestimate the damage to Australia's mentality that the Bairstow innings caused - they looked absolutely broken at the end of the England innings and I'm sure it contributed to a few dismissals. Fingers crossed the weather gives us at least one more session.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Friday, July 21, 2023, 20:26:42
I know the weather forecasters aren't always right but it's not looking good🙄


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 11:44:26
This is so frustrating.

My opinion on the non-declaration is that it was the right move


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Saxondale on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 12:47:58
Had a great day there on Thursday.  Ive been very lucky with my choices over the last couple of years, never seen a bad day of cricket.  Anderson wicket from ball one and almost a double hundred from Crawley.  Ali and Root playing nice entertaining innings.  Aussies looking demoralised and ragged. Excellent time.

Will be a shame if it all comes to nowt, but just the nature of the game.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 13:12:24
Looks like we might get on for half an hour here. Going to be brutal conditions for batting as and when we do get on for the next couple of days.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 14:44:05
Anyone got a weather update from Manchester. Is there likely to be any play today or a complete washout🤔


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 14:45:30
Anyone got a weather update from Manchester. Is there likely to be any play today or a complete washout🤔

Play started at 14:45.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 14:46:14
Anyone got a weather update from Manchester. Is there likely to be any play today or a complete washout🤔

Play started an hour ago.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 14:47:42
You've not missed a great deal, Aus batting very well. Made me smile though.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 14:49:11
Play started an hour ago.

Cheers Quaggy I had no idea🤣


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 14:50:13
You've not missed a great deal, Aus batting very well. Made me smile though.

My sports feed was still saying rain delay🤣

Now saying 159/4 Aussies trail by 116😆


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 14:54:17
Not sure I want to see Jimmy Anderson bowling bouncers round the wicket. Feels like this is a time for Stokes to bowl if he possibly can.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 15:09:56
Is there still a decent crowd inside Old Trafford considering the delay🤔


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 15:13:48
Looks full


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 15:15:09
Looks full

Cheers Aud


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 15:16:25
Joel Wilson saying it's too dark to bowl the quicks whilst wearing sunglasses is... interesting.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 15:33:39
Aussies only 68 behind now


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 15:42:03
Bairstow calling for the review without even asking Stokes >>>>>


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 15:43:40
5th wicked down :pint:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 15:43:50
Marnus knew he'd hit that.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 15:44:03
Could do with a wicket about now...

Edit: And there goes the lynchpin. Maybe Wilson needs to take his shades off. Labo was always going to get impatient eventually so a great wicket

Get Marsh or Carey and the rest will tumble quite quickly

I'm going to say England will need something like 65 runs to win. Should be able to do that in the space of one session tomorrow

Soo nearly a 6th wicket there too. It's coming though I think. Root finding his stride now after being thrashed about all over the place previously. Kudos to Bairstow - probably one of the players of the Test, and most of us {understandably} called for him to be dropped after underperforming. Not sure who said it but Bairstow often comes to the best when faced with one more failure.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 15:44:47
Bairstow calling for the review without even asking Stokes >>>>>

He knew didn’t he!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 15:46:55
He knew didn’t he!
Marnus told Marsh he’d hit it.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 15:50:58
Yep, he nodded and you knew he had. I heard something and it certainly seemed like bat. Snicko confirmed it

All good for England

All good for the Ashes

All good for cricket


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 15:56:28
Keep the rain away Kev and we got this😆


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 16:30:09

Keep the rain away Kev and we got this😆


Rain over Old Trafford set for about another hour. England should take the hour to 7.30pm to try and get out Marsh tonight.

Weather pending will then give them 2 sessions to get the other 4 out and a session to score any limited runs England might need.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 22, 2023, 16:35:12
Rain over Old Trafford set for about another hour. England should take the hour to 7.30pm to try and get out Marsh tonight.

Weather pending will then give them 3 sessions to get the other 4 out and a session to score any limited runs England might need.

With tomorrow's forecast looking poor the match is finally poised😀


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 08:06:14
Old Trafford & Gorse Hill Weather Update  :D

Rain maps stating no precipitation between now and 1pm...

Radar maps show current front across the NW, Pennines and NE slowly drifting from SW to NE and clearing. Manchester and Liverpool are literally right on the Southern edge of that front.

The only danger is if the front "spirals" a bit and the direction goes from a SW-NE to a NW-SE direction, meaning it'll bring more showers back towards Manny!

Long and short of that is, it looks like there will be some play today. Maybe upto lunch with just cloud if lucky so that'd be nice. After lunch?! Could be a wash out so if England get a good chunk of this morning session in, then they've got to be ruthless and try and bowl out the Aussies in that session!

It wouldn't be an Ashes Series in the UK if we weren't talking about how the weather might be the only real winner in a decisive Test Match - let's hope it isn't because that's just not cricket!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 09:13:28
If the Aussies retain the Ashes because of the weather after getting a pummelling through this whole test match, it'll be a travesty.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 09:13:49
Aussies bat deep and Marsh looks in great touch. Can’t help but feel yesterday we wasted our chance a little. If we had them 7 or 8 down, I’d be confident of bowling them out in a 30 minute period, but it makes our job a very uphill battle today, especially if they end up with any form of lead. Would be very Australian to have us chasing 20, light goes dark, Australia refuse to bowl their part-time spinners resulting in both teams going off for poor light.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: ChalkyWhiteIsGod on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 11:34:08
If the Aussies retain the Ashes because of the weather after getting a pummelling through this whole test match, it'll be a travesty.

Its happening.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 11:34:31
Old Trafford & Gorse Hill Weather Update  :D

Rain maps stating no precipitation between now and 1pm...

Radar maps show current front across the NW, Pennines and NE slowly drifting from SW to NE and clearing. Manchester and Liverpool are literally right on the Southern edge of that front.

The only danger is if the front "spirals" a bit and the direction goes from a SW-NE to a NW-SE direction, meaning it'll bring more showers back towards Manny!

Long and short of that is, it looks like there will be some play today. Maybe upto lunch with just cloud if lucky so that'd be nice. After lunch?! Could be a wash out so if England get a good chunk of this morning session in, then they've got to be ruthless and try and bowl out the Aussies in that session!

It wouldn't be an Ashes Series in the UK if we weren't talking about how the weather might be the only real winner in a decisive Test Match - let's hope it isn't because that's just not cricket!

The problem with weather maps they don't show drizzle precipitation which got me wet three times this morning after 9am😆


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 11:36:41
Its happening.

I never understand why they don't have a sixth day on standby if several hours play has been lost.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 12:22:11
I never understand why they don't have a sixth day on standby if several hours play has been lost.

They did for the World Test Final, but logistically it's very difficult for every game, having all the suppliers, broadcasters etc. just on hold in case.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 12:23:48
They did for the World Test Final, but logistically it's very difficult for every game, having all the suppliers, broadcasters etc. just on hold in case.

I get what you're saying just seems a shame if we don't get enough play today to get a result rather than the draw.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 13:05:21
What's the weather doing at Old Trafford anybody🤔


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 13:11:07
What's the weather doing at Old Trafford anybody🤔

They started an hour ag... only joking. It's raining, watch the golf.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 13:15:11
They started an hour ag... only joking. It's raining, watch the golf.

You went get me on that one again😆

Cheers Nemo at least play won't get interrupted unless there's a just stop oil protest🤣


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nick Bamosomi on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 14:12:47
If the Aussies retain the Ashes because of the weather after getting a pummelling through this whole test match, it'll be a travesty.

So frustrating.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 14:17:23
Any likelihood of play today?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 14:29:52
Any likelihood of play today?

Isn’t looking promising at the moment.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 14:37:13
Looks like game over but Monday looks fine😡


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 14:39:57
One day cricket will stop shooting itself in the foot, such as the ridiculous lunch break earlier when it wasn’t raining. One day…


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 16:27:13
And there it is. Disappointing as going the Oval at 2-2 would have set up the most brilliant finale, but rain happens, especially in Manchester.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Batch on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 16:28:39
should we have declared earlier?

I don't think there was enough time either way tbh


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 16:40:37
Nahh, right call was made just silly rules based on weather deciding the outcome of a game. I've no idea why at Ashes level at least, they can't suspend play (like in Tennis) and then continue where they left off.

It's not like rain in the UK is a new thing. Makes a bit of a mockery of a sport at Pro Level where a game can't be completed. It must be a near unique thing in sport. We geg postponements but ultimately games continue again.

Either that or they need to introduce some form of Duckworyh Lewis Method into Test Cricket. Not perfect but better than just a rain crested draw.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 16:52:34
Rewriting the rules of the game as established for over 150 years because it rained on two days of one games would be an overreaction. This is the first draw in 17 tests since McCullum took charge, these things happen. The logistics of having every game play to a full conclusion no matter how many days that takes would be completely unachievable.

Is it frustrating today? Absolutely. But ultimately saying it's the deciding factor in the series is rather choosing to forget the first two tests the Aussies won.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 17:03:53
Rewriting the rules of the game as established for over 150 years because it rained on two days of one games would be an overreaction. This is the first draw in 17 tests since McCullum took charge, these things happen. The logistics of having every game play to a full conclusion no matter how many days that takes would be completely unachievable.

Is it frustrating today? Absolutely. But ultimately saying it's the deciding factor in the series is rather choosing to forget the first two tests the Aussies won.

But it is a defining point of the series so yes it is important. I'm not advocating the complete Chang NG of the rules am I? I literally just stated an amendment or introducing a version of D/L like all limited overs games do.

I couldn't really care if the sport is 2yrs or 200yrs old. There have been much more major ammendments,, like introducing technology to ensure correct decisions.

But ok then, stick a retractable roof on the major cricket grounds then. I'm sure there's some science on the optimum height it would need to be to ensure clearance and these things are atmospherically intelligent, so conditions could be programmed to suit the weather conditions and humidity prior to a delay. Works for Tennis. Even if it took 2hrs to close and equalise the conditions, it would still mean you get a good chunk of play done.

Serious question and I know in part it's because Test Cricket doesn't have limited overs but why hasn't there been a Duckworth-Lewis-Stern equivalent created in order to set a target when there is a rain delay? Surely they could calculated an "expected overs" per day/innings and still calculate a run rate based of that (and remaining wickets of course).


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 17:09:34
Removing the draw would be an enormous change of the rules, yes. England have drawn about a third of the tests they've ever played. It would be a much bigger change than introducing DRS.

Putting a roof on a cricket ground would be monstrously expensive and possibly impossible from an engineering perspective, they're simply enormous, many many times higher footprint than centre court has, and circular. Maybe modern technology makes it more possible, but I certainly can't imagine it would be even close to economically viable.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 17:25:19

Removing the draw would be an enormous change of the rules, yes.

Putting a roof on a cricket ground would be monstrously expensive and possibly impossible from an engineering perspective, they're simply enormous, many many times higher footprint than centre court has, and circular. Maybe modern technology makes it more possible, but I certainly can't imagine it would be even close to economically viable.

I'm not asking to remove the draw indefinitely. You would still get draws if a game played out over the normal time period with no significant weather delays. I just feel like when say at least half a days play or more is lost, then there should be some way of recouping that rather than sacrificing a whole day - like today. Especially when it's a key/defining point and a match is in the balance.

Have you heard of The Eden Project? ;) Some hybrid form of biome that retracts in an armadillo type of fashion would work. Don't get me wrong they'd be relatively revolutionary in terms of size. I will remind you that several football stadia have retractable roofs too so you're maybe looking at something 2 or 3 times larger than a Wembley roof. Plus it could be something that doesn't have to be so large and only shields an area from where the rain is coming from and any particular time. Maybe it has intelligence which means it can be programmed to follow/track a weather system too?

I think you're looking for excuses rather than solutions Nemo* :)




*I is just pullin ye leg


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 17:26:42
Just the one cricket stadium in the world with a retractable roof
Melbourne Docklands stadium

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aIM_1DsumGU&pp=ygUbbWVsYm91cm5lIGRvY2tsYW5kcyBzdGFkaXVt

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l57K5S4aSvg&pp=ygUbbWVsYm91cm5lIGRvY2tsYW5kcyBzdGFkaXVt


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: adje on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 19:32:37
Wonder if people would be saying the same if roles were reversed? I mean it's not like England have never been saved by the weather


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 20:29:57
Just the one cricket stadium in the world with a retractable roof
Melbourne Docklands stadium

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aIM_1DsumGU&pp=ygUbbWVsYm91cm5lIGRvY2tsYW5kcyBzdGFkaXVt

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l57K5S4aSvg&pp=ygUbbWVsYm91cm5lIGRvY2tsYW5kcyBzdGFkaXVt

It can't be done :hehe::


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, July 23, 2023, 20:31:39
Wonder if people would be saying the same if roles were reversed? I mean it's not like England have never been saved by the weather

Yup I would. And just because a nation many of us support has profited from such a circumstance, it doesn't necessarily make it right.

Well it does under current laws but you understand what I mean :)


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: adje on Monday, July 24, 2023, 07:59:17
Yep, I do. Fair point but I just can't help thinking we wouldn't be having this debate if England had benefited from the weather. Not just you Bamboo but everywhere today on the media. I've been following cricket for 60 years and I may be wrong,but I really don't recall any such debate. It's always been accepted that weather plays a part. Until now


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Monday, July 24, 2023, 14:46:00
Yep, I do. Fair point but I just can't help thinking we wouldn't be having this debate if England had benefited from the weather. Not just you Bamboo but everywhere today on the media. I've been following cricket for 60 years and I may be wrong,but I really don't recall any such debate. It's always been accepted that weather plays a part. Until now

Yeah, but they used to say that about floodlights. No-one really likes drawn games. And actively dislike teams playing for a draw from day one of the game as Aus did in this test. Anything that minimises teams playing that sort of tedious  ticket is worth exploring.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Monday, July 24, 2023, 15:11:57
Yep, I do. Fair point but I just can't help thinking we wouldn't be having this debate if England had benefited from the weather. Not just you Bamboo but everywhere today on the media. I've been following cricket for 60 years and I may be wrong,but I really don't recall any such debate. It's always been accepted that weather plays a part. Until now

Agreed. The main point for me is the lost time due to a slow over rate which has been a recurrent issue this series. I've been thinking about enforcing it:
- Penalty runs - batting team could slow it down to force the team to forfeit penalty runs.
- Bowl until it gets dark - bowling team could slow it down to bowl in more favourable conditions under lights.

The best solution I've come up with is to start at 10.30, play 2 hour 20 sessions and reduce lunch break to 30 mins.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: fuzzy on Monday, July 24, 2023, 15:39:34
Agreed. The main point for me is the lost time due to a slow over rate which has been a recurrent issue this series. I've been thinking about enforcing it:
- Penalty runs - batting team could slow it down to force the team to forfeit penalty runs.
- Bowl until it gets dark - bowling team could slow it down to bowl in more favourable conditions under lights.

The best solution I've come up with is to start at 10.30, play 2 hour 20 sessions and reduce lunch break to 30 mins.

Have a play clock like NFL.

A maximum number of seconds between the end of one passage of play and the ball leaving the bowlers hand for the next delivery?

Passage of play determined by the ball being bowled to the ball being recieved by a fielder and becoming 'dead'.

Play clock runs out because of field team fuckwittery- +4 penalty runs.

Play clock runs out due to at bat team fuckwittery- -4 penalty runs.

Double the play clock time between overs to allow fielding changes.

Need a conflab with your boys/ girls? Timeout. Maximum number of timeouts per side per session.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Monday, July 24, 2023, 15:43:37
Agreed. The main point for me is the lost time due to a slow over rate which has been a recurrent issue this series. I've been thinking about enforcing it:
- Penalty runs - batting team could slow it down to force the team to forfeit penalty runs.
- Bowl until it gets dark - bowling team could slow it down to bowl in more favourable conditions under lights.

The best solution I've come up with is to start at 10.30, play 2 hour 20 sessions and reduce lunch break to 30 mins.

Or just play until 90 overs are completed in the day, less adjustment for innings changes etc.
15 or 16 hours of daylight in the summer months, plenty of time.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Bogus Dave on Monday, July 24, 2023, 16:30:42
I think the play clock idea works if the only penalty runs occur against the bowling side. The batters punishment is a hit at the stumps if you’re not ready


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, July 27, 2023, 11:52:51
Romping along this morning, 127/3 with an over to go after being inserted. For all the nonsense about moral victories, England really are enormous fun to watch at the moment - with the bat anyway, actually find their bowling tactics to be quite dull when they go to the short ball, providing it's not Wood doing them!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, July 27, 2023, 13:11:21
Moeen crocked and going on the attack, this is great.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Thursday, July 27, 2023, 13:11:55
Why hasn’t he got a runner


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Thursday, July 27, 2023, 13:13:00
Why hasn’t he got a runner

Not allowed anymore - people were taking the piss


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, July 27, 2023, 13:14:54
Oh boo.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Thursday, July 27, 2023, 13:15:17
Shame - was good fun there.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RobertT on Thursday, July 27, 2023, 13:15:48
He got 6 more than his Test Average


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Thursday, July 27, 2023, 15:21:03
Hope we get 300😁


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Thursday, July 27, 2023, 15:23:16
Doh!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Thursday, July 27, 2023, 15:25:22
Root, Stokes & Bairstow not at the races today!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Thursday, July 27, 2023, 15:28:55
I don’t think that’s an awful score


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: reeves4england on Thursday, July 27, 2023, 15:34:47
From what people are saying, it's a reasonable total at the Oval this summer. Time will tell.

Definitely a bit more movement than elsewhere. Can our bowlers exploit that?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 28, 2023, 10:51:35
Bowling really well this morning, Aussies have barely scored a run and beaten the bat so many times... but no wickets. People will look at the scorecard and think Anderson needs to retire, he and Broad have bowled beautifully this morning and it's just not quite taken the edge. Luck not quite there.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 28, 2023, 13:26:31
The Old Firm strike back after lunch - really pleased for Anderson.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nick Bamosomi on Friday, July 28, 2023, 13:50:20
The Old Firm strike back after lunch - really pleased for Anderson.
It’s good to see. Feel more positive than I did first thing today.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 28, 2023, 14:01:42
Carey falls into a trap despite an enormous 50ft neon sign saying "TRAP" on it, pelting the ball straight to Stokes off the spinner.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, July 28, 2023, 15:10:18
Oh come on now. This series is just being silly now.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Friday, July 28, 2023, 17:17:55
Aussies take the lead!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: adje on Friday, July 28, 2023, 17:19:16
Oz
Oh come on now. This series is just being silly now.
Yes. Oz are nowhere near as good as I thought they'd be and England not as good as they think they are


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Friday, July 28, 2023, 17:19:55
OzYes. Oz are nowhere near as good as I thought they'd be and England not as good as they think they are

That's exactly right :clap:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Friday, July 28, 2023, 18:20:53
Need to get a big total tomorrow and bowl them out on Sunday as Monday looks wet!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 10:22:05
England 40-0 after 4 overs. What the actual fuck?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 10:25:38
About what they managed in the session yesterday morning that.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 10:26:22
About what they managed in the session yesterday morning that.

Crazy to think that.

Appalling bowling by the Oz


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 11:48:49
Amazing to think how many people didn’t want Crawley opening in this series, I was one of them who was unsure.
He’s been absolutely outstanding.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: reeves4england on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 12:21:17
Was mentioned on TMS that this is possibly the first time in a decade you can't really debate th opening pair. They've had a strong series.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 12:35:45
They have had a strong series, as has Khawaja for Aus. I do wonder if it's the same reason Anderson has had a poor series - the ball has swung but not really much in the first 8 overs or so which is what you'd normally expect for English conditions. Even Warner has generally got starts, he's just got out afterwards.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 13:17:37
With the number of wickets we have in hand and the strong batting line up to come, I’d like to see Stokesy open up a little bit now. He can do some much damage when throwing caution to the wind it’d be a shame if he plays reserved and gets out cheaply. Just go for it


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 13:20:06
Are you looking to declare today as Monday's forecast isn't looking good


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 13:23:18
Two days left, any declaration today would be last 30-40 mins at most you'd think. Pitch has definitely flattened out, I'd want to set 330+ although we might be there by tea.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 13:26:06
That's my thinking. As long as we have a decent total late afternoons maybe give the bowlers a few overs.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 13:27:16
Give the bowlers as long a rest as possible, they’ve only had half a day off.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 13:30:55
Sunday and Monday afternoons looking wet now🤣


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 13:43:32
I agree that we need to give the bowlers a rest and build a fat lead, even if the weather ‘looks’ bad as Jimmy has suggested. Forecast could always be wrong


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 15:43:14
Already leading by 305 with six wickets in hand. Time to knock the Aussies around the boundary😀


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 15:44:06
Already leading by 305 with six wickets in hand. Time to knock the Aussies around the boundary😀

We’ve been doing that all day.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 15:46:37
We’ve been doing that all day.

What do you reckon Quaggy carry on for the next hour and bat first thing tomorrow morning before declaring🤔


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 15:47:59
What do you reckon Quaggy carry on for the next hour and bat first thing tomorrow morning before declaring🤔

I’d bat up till lunch tomorrow, personally. Want to see us hammer them.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 15:49:17
I’d bat up till lunch tomorrow, personally. Want to see us hammer them.

Same here just hope the weather holds up and they don't get another undeserving draw.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 17:47:13
Stuart Broad announces his retirement.

What a cricketer.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 18:06:40
Fucking hell, that's some surprise. I assume he discussed it with Jimmy beforehand!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 18:10:06
As above he's been a fantastic cricketer.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 18:11:57
Fucking hell, that's some surprise. I assume he discussed it with Jimmy beforehand!

Told Jimmy this morning supposedly before telling the team.
Told Stokes and McCullum last night.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: ChalkyWhiteIsGod on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 18:24:34
Would have thought he'd have held off until after the game but suppose any wickets will be extra special now


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 18:30:10
Would have thought he'd have held off until after the game but suppose any wickets will be extra special now

Having listened to his interview I think basically he didn't want it to get leaked before he'd said anything publicly, which is fair enough.

A phenomenal cricketer, and arguably bowling as well as he ever has. Stepped up against the Aussies more than anyone since Botham really, so makes sense to go out on an Ashes series.

Every chance that four of this team never play another test - Broad retiring, Jimmy must be thinking about it, Moeen I'd be shocked if he doesn't re-retire after this and Woakes doesn't play away anyway, and who knows where he'll be next summer.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, July 29, 2023, 19:45:29
Would have thought he'd have held off until after the game but suppose any wickets will be extra special now
I think Anderson will announce his on the final day of the Test. Think that was why B-road did it now.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 09:05:37
A phenomenal cricketer, and arguably bowling as well as he ever has. Stepped up against the Aussies more than anyone since Botham really, so makes sense to go out on an Ashes series.

As Broad said himself, going out on a high is absolutely the best time to do it. Fair play to him.

If Jimmy does announce his retirement now he's going to look a little silly, in my opinion, which is a shame. Yes he's struggled with injury but he hasn't been at the top of his game for some time now.

The feeling with Broad's retirement is one of a bit of shock but also acceptance, with Jimmy I feel most people would say it's a few series too late.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 09:23:31
I can see a better argument for Jimmy playing on if Broad isn't to be fair - losing both at the same time would be difficult for the team, and the next away series in India where Jimmy has a much better record than you might imagine.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 10:57:57
Really feel a bit emotional about Broad retiring. Such a competitor but also a really likeable, engaging guy. Up there with our very best cricketers in my opinion. Really hope he gets Warner!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Boy About Town on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 10:59:57
Really feel a bit emotional about Broad retiring. Such a competitor but also a really likeable, engaging guy. Up there with our very best cricketers in my opinion. Really hope he gets Warner!

Real shame. Amazed Anderson wasn’t first to retire of the two.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nick Bamosomi on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 11:19:19
Really feel a bit emotional about Broad retiring. Such a competitor but also a really likeable, engaging guy. Up there with our very best cricketers in my opinion. Really hope he gets Warner!

Can’t think many people will disagree with any of that.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 11:41:15
I would think Sky will snap Broad up if that's what he wants to do. Very media friendly guy...


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 11:41:43
Must admit, I’m slightly nervous that Australia might chase this. They’ve got so much time, there’s zero pressure to do anything other than chip away. Could be squeaky bum time


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 11:42:55
I would think Sky will snap Broad up if that's what he wants to do. Very media friendly guy...

I would have thought so too. He’s well spoken, cheeky and very knowledgable. I think I’ve got a man crush, to be honest


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 11:44:02
Must admit, I’m slightly nervous that Australia might chase this. They’ve got so much time, there’s zero pressure to do anything other than chip away. Could be squeaky bum time

I think the forecast rain will lubrate the squeak!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 12:03:57
384 is a huge target, I'm not too worried but where is Wood!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nick Bamosomi on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 13:05:33
384 is a huge target, I'm not too worried but where is Wood!

He’s here!! Let’s hope he can make something happen soon.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 13:12:07
Sounds like the Aussies are smashing England.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 13:18:18
Threw away a really good position yesterday. Should have batted them out of this and posted 450+.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 13:19:59
Pitch looks dead and Warner & Khawaja are set in.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 13:22:00
So much for th pitch deteriorating after 3 days!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 13:43:26
And now the rain starts.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 13:44:29
Probably help us😆


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 13:45:35
This has really swung the Aussies way. Fair play to them, DW and UK have batted exceptionally. Hoping for a Broad flurry now


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 14:01:23
One of the few downsides of Bazball, it’s not often that you have pretty much two full days to chase a score to win.

Australia can just keep grinding out a score knowing that they have plenty of time, and if the rain intervenes they still win the series.

Assuming there’s not much more play today, England need quick wickets tomorrow morning & hope the Aussies start to panic.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 14:08:39
Good summary  :clap:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 17:40:21
Broad getting his warm up gig/interview for Sky Cricket with an easy segment talking about and giving tip to improving young bowlers. I think the job is his if he wants it.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, July 30, 2023, 18:35:13
A couple of Aussie greats of which there many

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cgSdfxRUKAo&t=303s


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Monday, July 31, 2023, 10:35:42
Woakes removes the two openers, need another couple before lunch and it’s game on again


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Monday, July 31, 2023, 10:59:51
Wood gets in the act too


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Monday, July 31, 2023, 12:12:42
Looking ominous now.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Monday, July 31, 2023, 12:30:15
Wow what a massive moment. Correct decision though.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Monday, July 31, 2023, 12:31:12
With 5 Batters England had 25O runs
at a similar stage, Aussies have 225...

Would be a key time to get Smith out as that'll unsettle Head.

After then, getting Marsh and Cummins out would see the rest tumble really. This session I think is the one where they need to get the key wickets. Maybe bring Root in for a few cameo overs? Pitch seemed to work well for Murphy...although it is a bit ''greener'' than it was before the recent rain.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Monday, July 31, 2023, 13:02:57
Wow what a massive moment. Correct decision though.

Yep. Harsh and an instinctive thing to do....that was the wicket I was hoping for. All about the afternoon session still. At least England know they have a way of getting Smith out...they just need to remember that catches win matches.

Edit: or they'll be shafted by beautiful English Summer Rain again...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dY3n257BMs

'...English Summer rain...seems to last for ages...'


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Monday, July 31, 2023, 16:00:01
Time for a Broad hat trick to end his career (please)


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, July 31, 2023, 16:00:16
Sounds finally balanced


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Monday, July 31, 2023, 16:02:50
Key man was Travis Head, sparked a collapse


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Monday, July 31, 2023, 16:03:40
Cummins is the final key wicket to take. Never underestimate a captain.

Bairstow looking like player of the Test so far. Upped his batting game and that reaction time to catch Marsh. Not bad for a fatty.

I don't like cricket. I love it.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, July 31, 2023, 16:06:16
In England's favour now :pint:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Monday, July 31, 2023, 16:25:00
There goes the Cap'n. Stokes glued that one to his hand  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Monday, July 31, 2023, 16:28:21
Here comes Broad


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, July 31, 2023, 16:59:25
Finely balanced again


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, July 31, 2023, 16:59:38
What a finish this is. If only it was 2-2 we'd be in all time great test match and best series of all time areas.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, July 31, 2023, 17:00:40
Brilliant series had everything


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, July 31, 2023, 17:04:43
GWAN STU


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, July 31, 2023, 17:05:06
Beautiful  :clap:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nick Bamosomi on Monday, July 31, 2023, 17:05:48
It had to be…


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Monday, July 31, 2023, 17:06:22
'Change ya bails, change ya luck'

Broady


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, July 31, 2023, 17:07:07
How long before they stop it🤣


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, July 31, 2023, 17:08:03
Completely gutting that Broad realised this one simple trick in his last test.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Monday, July 31, 2023, 17:08:06
What a finish this is. If only it was 2-2 we'd be in all time great test match and best series of all time areas.

Absolutely, we all know the Fourth Test was England's bar rain. I put an asterix on Aussies retention. Great finish. Very fitting for Test Cricket to end on a day like this.

Now that is cricket  :D


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Monday, July 31, 2023, 17:10:37
As much as I would like Broad to get the final wicket. I'd love Woakes to have a 5 wicket haul as well.

This'll be over before 6.45pm

  :pint: :pint: :pint: :pint:




Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, July 31, 2023, 17:16:58
Need two seamers to take the last wicket with the new ball


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nick Bamosomi on Monday, July 31, 2023, 17:19:31
What a way to sign off, Stuart Broad!!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, July 31, 2023, 17:19:34
Fantastic finale :clap: :clap:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, July 31, 2023, 17:19:54
What a guy


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Monday, July 31, 2023, 17:21:42
And there it is.

Well that was nice  :pint: :pint:


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Monday, July 31, 2023, 17:21:55
Broad finishes his career with a six (batting) and a wicket (bowling).
Blessed.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, July 31, 2023, 17:22:16
What a fucking rush it must be to go out like that.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, July 31, 2023, 17:22:47
More exciting than any football😀


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Monday, July 31, 2023, 17:29:10
Broad finishes his career with a six (batting) and a wicket (bowling).
Blessed.

Amazing stuff, a test match winning wicket with your last ever ball


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, July 31, 2023, 17:35:05
Real Rorschach test that series - a pessimist could see it as our best chance to win the ashes in years squandered by a few bad decisions, with probably half this team unlikely to play another. The more positive amongst us (which I am, at cricket at least) will think it was just brilliant start to finish. Drawn women's ashes, drawn men's ashes, Aus looking miles ahead in both and England nearly, nearly managing the comeback only to finish even.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Bogus Dave on Monday, July 31, 2023, 18:09:02
I’m only recently getting back into cricket, but Australia literally won the world championship a couple of months ago, right?

A drawn series won on points is a good result, surely

Also, only watching cricket for the first time in years - how long has the TV direction been so haphazard?! Lost count of the number of wild camera angle cuts to nowhere


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Monday, July 31, 2023, 18:20:23
They did but the world test championship is a bit of a weird event that hasn't really got the prestige it sounds like it should have - more club world cup than world cup!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: dalumpimunki on Monday, July 31, 2023, 20:48:05
Real Rorschach test that series - a pessimist could see it as our best chance to win the ashes in years squandered by a few bad decisions, with probably half this team unlikely to play another. The more positive amongst us (which I am, at cricket at least) will think it was just brilliant start to finish. Drawn women's ashes, drawn men's ashes, Aus looking miles ahead in both and England nearly, nearly managing the comeback only to finish even.

I'm with you on this. After the 2021/22 series I thought we were miles behind Australia and were likely to be twatted in this one. The turn around from that, and the West Indies tour last spring is amazing. We used largely the same group of players as the last ashes series but the team is unrecognizable.




Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Tuesday, August 1, 2023, 10:06:43
Are there any one day or T-20 games with the Aussies coming up?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Tuesday, August 1, 2023, 10:08:48
Are there any one day or T-20 games with the Aussies coming up?

No, nothing, all done now with the Aussies.

The One Day World Cup is in a couple of months.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Tuesday, August 1, 2023, 16:59:18
Excellent commentary team.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sr03V0G8mJk


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: fuzzy on Wednesday, August 2, 2023, 08:20:55
Don't know if it just clickbait but, seen a couple of articles suggesting Ponting and McGrath demanding investigations into a couple of 'issues' after the loss to England.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Cookie on Wednesday, August 2, 2023, 08:47:19
The ball change was suss but the convicts need to get over it. These two are just journos so their job is to stir the shit.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, August 5, 2023, 17:34:44
I was a bit/extremely bored this morning, so I decided to crunch some numbers to compare the average number of sixes scored in a test match by England in the 18 tests since the inception of Bazball with the number in the 18 matches pre Bazball (according to cricinfo)

Pre Bazball: 57 sixes in 18 tests, on average 3.1 sixes per test

Post Bazball: 140 sixes in 18 tests, on average 7.8 sixes per test

That’s a rather mental statistic if you ask me


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, August 5, 2023, 17:38:26
The ball change was suss but the convicts need to get over it. These two are just journos so their job is to stir the shit.

Question on the ball change don't both captains or players from both sides get to look and agree that the replacement is of a similar condition.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Saturday, August 5, 2023, 18:19:46
Question on the ball change don't both captains or players from both sides get to look and agree that the replacement is of a similar condition.

Not any more, the umpires decide.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, August 5, 2023, 18:25:12
Not any more, the umpires decide.

Hmmm interesting😆


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: ChalkyWhiteIsGod on Wednesday, October 4, 2023, 13:26:41
World Cup starts tomorrow. Anyone arsed? Will probably try to catch as much of our first game as I can.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Wednesday, October 4, 2023, 16:52:52
I'll be watching.

Brook has to play.



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Wednesday, October 4, 2023, 17:00:09
I’m looking forward to it.

England v India final.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Thursday, October 5, 2023, 05:15:04
Not been on my radar much but looking forward to it bud it’s here. England India final which will be one billionth as exciting as the last World Cup final


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, October 5, 2023, 07:35:49
I'll follow along, imagine the format is ludicrous as ever to maximise the number of India games before there's any prospect of anyone being knocked out.

India should win it. Fancy Sri Lanka might spring a few surprises. England's chances rely on Adil Rashid being fit I think, there's a big drop off after him for spinners and they'll be crucial in the later stages in particular. Would like to see this generation go out on a high, it'll be a big turnover after this tournament I think as this is now an old team:

Root 32, plays tests
Stokes 32, plays all formats and broken in six different ways
Buttler 33
Willey 33
Wood 33, always injured
Woakes 34
Bairstow 34, plays all formats
Rashid 35, dodgy shoulder
Moeen 36
Malan 36

A few young uns around - Brook, Curran, Atkinson - but this side is old.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Cookie on Thursday, October 5, 2023, 13:23:23
England getting a bit of a pumping so far with the ball, hopefully Rashid can work some magic.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, October 6, 2023, 06:18:01
Yeah, that didn't happen.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Sunday, October 15, 2023, 14:04:14
A defeat to Afghanistan here is very much on the cards.

Need a partnership here from Brook and Butler.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, October 15, 2023, 14:46:47
It's not going brilliantly


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Sunday, October 15, 2023, 14:57:11
6 down


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Samdy Gray on Monday, October 16, 2023, 10:49:24
It's not going brilliantly

Didn't end brilliantly either :D


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, October 17, 2023, 16:42:08
Didn't end brilliantly either :D

Saffers doing their best to make us feel better today, after looking rather good at the start of the tournament...

Tournament feels like it's a contest to come a distant second to India at the moment.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Saturday, October 21, 2023, 12:26:49
Are South Africa going to make 400, looks quite likely at the moment


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Saturday, October 21, 2023, 12:36:08
Not quite, 399-7 so England would need 400 to win


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Saturday, October 21, 2023, 13:52:09
38-4 bloody hell!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Saturday, October 21, 2023, 14:11:22
67-5 now.

Embarrassing


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Saturday, October 21, 2023, 14:31:30
84-7, it gets worse.

Apparently we have scored enough to have avoided the worst ever World Cup defeat


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Saturday, October 21, 2023, 14:41:22
Up there with 2015. At least then we had a poor squad, on paper, we have very good ODI players, but since 2019, they’ve played fuck all ODI’s, and shock, haven’t been able to perform.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: oxonrobin on Saturday, October 21, 2023, 14:58:17
84-7, it gets worse.

Apparently we have scored enough to have avoided the worst ever World Cup defeat

Hmm, doesn’t bode well for Eng v SA in the rugby later!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Thursday, October 26, 2023, 09:47:40
Just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse . . .

Jeez!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Posh Red on Thursday, October 26, 2023, 10:02:06
Serious question, how much difference does a good captain make?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, October 26, 2023, 10:09:48
Serious question, how much difference does a good captain make?

Lots, but not the whole difference between England's level in this tournament and the level they'd need to be at to compete. The decision to bowl first against SA was just plain old wrong.

I've said it before, but this just looks like a team that got old all at once. Nobody in this side looks anywhere near their peak.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: harrisonaw on Thursday, October 26, 2023, 10:51:27
This is pathetic


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, October 26, 2023, 11:16:33
India should win it. Fancy Sri Lanka might spring a few surprises.

Not like this!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Thursday, October 26, 2023, 11:32:25
That was bad.
Be good to see the back of a lot of these after this tournament, we’ve got some good players waiting in the wings (Brook, Duckett, Crawley etc) so I think this is a case of one last hurrah.

Stokes shouldn’t have come back, should have had his knee sorted ready for the India test series.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Robinz on Thursday, October 26, 2023, 20:05:17
Totally embarrassing 😳
Will only get worse with games against India and Australia coming up.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: donkey on Friday, October 27, 2023, 08:51:55
Totally embarrassing 😳
Will only get worse with games against India and Australia coming up.

What's so sad about this is that none of the taking heads seem to be allowed to say why.

Bin the 100.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, October 27, 2023, 08:56:30
What's so sad about this is that none of the taking heads seem to be allowed to say why.

Bin the 100.

It is a bit more complex than that though, it's not like any of the established England players ever turned out in the 50 over domestic stuff back before the Hundred took over. It's definitely a problem for the next generation, but this isn't the next generation, this is the guys who have played hundreds of List A games and they're still shitting the bed.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: donkey on Friday, October 27, 2023, 09:04:03
It is a bit more complex than that though, it's not like any of the established England players ever turned out in the 50 over domestic stuff back before the Hundred took over. It's definitely a problem for the next generation, but this isn't the next generation, this is the guys who have played hundreds of List A games and they're still shitting the bed.

But the 50 over comp was reserves as the better players were signed up to the 100. So they've had little play this year.  The fact that the 100 also screws up the test and county championship season is another reason to bin it.  Oh, and you're asking the good people of Leicestershire and Derbyshire to support a team in Nottingham (for example)... Good luck with that.

Hardly any 50 over play and Root was calling for less T20! Yeah, that's the reason.  Did we have the T20 when we won the 50 over World Cup? So what's changed since then?

The answer is obvious.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Cookie on Friday, October 27, 2023, 12:24:16
The Hundred is rank for English cricket. If they want more kids watching just put more England matches on the proper telly, but that won't make the old men at the top any money, the opposite in fact, so it won't happen. Greed is at fault, as with many things.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, October 27, 2023, 13:15:11
But the 50 over comp was reserves as the better players were signed up to the 100. So they've had little play this year.  The fact that the 100 also screws up the test and county championship season is another reason to bin it.  Oh, and you're asking the good people of Leicestershire and Derbyshire to support a team in Nottingham (for example)... Good luck with that.

Hardly any 50 over play and Root was calling for less T20! Yeah, that's the reason.  Did we have the T20 when we won the 50 over World Cup? So what's changed since then?

The answer is obvious.

These are general arguments against the Hundred that I agree with, I just don't think *this* World Cup is the Hundred's fault - all of these players are over 30 and have played a ton of 50 over cricket. I think the Hundred gives us far less chance of developing future excellent 50 over players as they'll all be playing 20 overs or less almost exclusively, but I don't think it's an excuse for this group of players. They've just underachieved mightily.

If the domestic 50 over stuff didn't clash with the 100, the established players would have still skipped it as they'd need to rest after the IPL/International matches, or they'd have found a more lucrative tournament to play in in Ulanbaatar.

As Nasser said the other day, Virat Kohli and Heinrich Klassen don't play domestic 50 over cricket either and they seem to be doing just fine.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, October 29, 2023, 08:33:26
Unchanged against India, choosing to field first.

That's very brave of you, Prime Minister.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, October 29, 2023, 09:06:34
Isn't the issue more to do with the fact that we don't seem to have any control in the bowling department (ie Inability to take wickets to stem run rate) and then take too many risks batting?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Sunday, October 29, 2023, 11:28:10
Making a fist of it v undefeated India today. India 167-5.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, October 29, 2023, 14:24:47
Bowled alright on a tough pitch, now batting... well, they're batting. That's all I'm willing to say about that.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, October 29, 2023, 15:51:29
Just switched it on to watch an exciting finish. Saw Wiley hit a 6 and Wood clean bowled!



Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Munichred on Tuesday, November 7, 2023, 16:59:08
It has to be said, an unbelievable innings from Maxwell today. I feel really sorry for Afghanistan, especially the player who dropped the easiest of catches early in Maxwell's innings.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Thursday, November 16, 2023, 09:15:46
Bit of a masterclass in bowling and fielding here from OZ.

Run rate of 1.76 in the 10th over in a world cup semi final!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Thursday, November 16, 2023, 09:16:57
Bit of a masterclass in bowling and fielding here from OZ.

Run rate of 1.76 in the 10th over in a world cup semi final!


You just know they’re going to win the tournament.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, November 16, 2023, 09:22:10
You just know they’re going to win the tournament.

Would be a bit funny if India dominated the entire tournament as clearly the best team *and* the organisers being on side, and then Aussie beat them in the final.

Don't think it'll happen though, India are just really, really good.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Thursday, November 16, 2023, 12:46:03
Bit of a fightback from SA. 200+ at least gives them something to try and defend.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Thursday, November 16, 2023, 14:56:52
Aussies 5 down. Great watch.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, November 19, 2023, 15:18:40
India absolutely dominated every game start to finish in the group stages and semis and now ballsing up the final. Feel a bit sorry for them really, but it is funny.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Sunday, November 19, 2023, 17:26:41
At 47-3 India must've thought they had this in the bag. Step forward Travis Head. Not bad at this cricket stuff is he?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, January 25, 2024, 09:05:16
Little better to watch than the bit where Ben Stokes shifts gears and just starts twatting everything to Mars


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Thursday, January 25, 2024, 09:20:58
Little better to watch than the bit where Ben Stokes shifts gears and just starts twatting everything to Mars

The bloke is a machine, he’s just had a knee operation and plays like this.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, January 28, 2024, 07:44:54
Very good performance by England. India virtually impossible to beat at home and England have given themselves a good chance here. Think India will chase the runs but you never know.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, January 28, 2024, 09:26:54
Getting a bit fun in Hyderabad but we should take a moment to laugh at Aus losing to West Indies B.

Tremendous stuff.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, January 28, 2024, 09:43:13
England favourites now. This is absolutely amazing


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Sunday, January 28, 2024, 12:03:42
Superb, absolutely superb.
Yet another brilliant test match. 


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Robinz on Sunday, January 28, 2024, 12:08:47
Great test match...


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, January 28, 2024, 12:23:48
That was great. One of the best overseas wins and Pope's innings could be the best ever for England overseas, from a guy who has looked absolutely lost until he got to about 20 in that innings when batting in India.

Still think India will win 4-1, it's taken a generational innings for us to win by 20. India are just better than us. Best chance we have is then overreacting and creating ridiculous pitches for the last four games and England winning a few tosses.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, January 28, 2024, 20:10:34
Been a while since we’ve seen a new stroke but that ridiculously wristy overhead scoop shot thingy that Pope pulled out of the bag a couple of times might become his trademark.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Sunday, January 28, 2024, 21:47:49
I think the highest 1st innings deficit and going on to beat India at home was the Aussies with 64(?). England were 190 down on first innings scores - massive effort.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, February 4, 2024, 10:13:23
So, 399 to chase. That’s impossible…but this is England. You. Just. Never. Know.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Friday, February 16, 2024, 10:36:29
What a fantastic knock by Duckett. Century off 88 balls, 20 boundaries!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Friday, February 16, 2024, 10:37:49
What a player.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Friday, February 16, 2024, 10:38:24
Let’s see if he lasts another 88 balls!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, February 16, 2024, 10:38:28
Great knock by Duckett, and a really intriguing match shaping up. I think this’ll be a fun one even by England’s standards


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Friday, February 16, 2024, 10:40:55
6 runs per over in Test cricket. Wow!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Pericardinho on Friday, February 16, 2024, 10:48:55
England's style is so good for test cricket.

This game would usually be at massive threat of a draw. But with England batting at this run rate, it increases the chance of a result considerably.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, February 16, 2024, 10:59:13
England's style is so good for test cricket.

This game would usually be at massive threat of a draw. But with England batting at this run rate, it increases the chance of a result considerably.


They are showing a completely new way to play test cricket, and it’s not just what they physically do in the middle. Between Stokesy and Bazzy they are creating a whole new mindset where everyone is allowed to make mistakes without fear a repercussions. Doesn’t hurt that we’ve got some all-time great players too, I ‘spose.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, February 17, 2024, 04:35:06
Very, very poor from Bairstowy and Rooty. I’m not sure I’ve ever seen the latter so out of form.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, February 17, 2024, 04:46:15
Ducketty adds another 50. What a player. What a headband.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, February 17, 2024, 05:00:35
Really starting to dislike Michael Vaughan. I don’t even want to grace him with a y on the end of his surname.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, February 17, 2024, 07:09:29
How different things look now! 207-2 to 305-7


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Saturday, February 17, 2024, 07:23:43
Pathetic that was.

The pros and cons of ‘Baz Ball’ seen yesterday and this morning.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Saturday, February 17, 2024, 10:57:04
Absolutely ruthless from India. Fair play to them, they’ve ripped England apart. Avery bad day at the office. We’ll get them in the next test.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, February 17, 2024, 11:15:17
Pathetic that was.

The pros and cons of ‘Baz Ball’ seen yesterday and this morning.

We managed to lose 8 for shit all pretty regularly before the Bazball era!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Sunday, February 18, 2024, 08:33:31
Quite how you get run out opening in a second innings when chasing over 500 is unbelievable!

It wasn’t Crawley’s call, but why was Duckett trying a near suicide single?


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, February 18, 2024, 09:13:01
Good win from here


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Robinz on Sunday, February 18, 2024, 10:28:34
What is worse...
Watching Swindon or England in India ???


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, February 18, 2024, 10:51:52
What is worse...
Watching Swindon or England in India ???


Definitely watching Swindon x infinity billion. This test aside there’s still plenty to be proud of when it comes to the England cricket team. Plus I still want to see their next match.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, February 18, 2024, 11:20:23
Really disappointed to lose in the crushing manner we did. But it’s always a possibility with the style we play and I don’t lament it in the slightest. We lost it yesterday with one particularly poor batting collapse, which can happen to any team, and used to happen to us almost without fail. Bring on the next test.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, February 18, 2024, 11:24:44
Never chasing that target but that effort was pure 'get another day off' stuff.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Friday, February 23, 2024, 10:47:44
Cracking recovery today. Hope we win this test and go into test 5 at 2-2. Bit of a pre-Bazball day today, reliant on Root but Root being reliable no problem.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Friday, February 23, 2024, 11:49:50
Excellent from Rooty and Foaksey. We were in real trouble for a while!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Friday, February 23, 2024, 17:09:44
I still think the ability to play traditional test plodding and bazball would work best. Like a 30:70 blend. Occasionally a player needs to just plod along and get a double century over the course of near all day innings, other times a quick rush of T20 style powerplay thrashing is needed.

I honestly think several years ago, Kevin Pietersen was that type of pioneering cricketer. His face didn't fit {even though he was a bit of a dick but the likes of Strauss or Gooch didn't want him around}, mostly because he didn't think Alastair Cook should have been Captain {there's no doubt Cook was a great Cricketer, but like many who take on a Captaincy - it impacted his form; similarly with Root too} and English cricket, whilst somewhat peaking at test level, wasn't really progressive in style. People used to be shocked/excited/unsure whenever KP decided to let the shackles off and reverse sweep every third ball.

I think the difference today is, KP knew with applying that approach that there was consequences but today with ''Bazball'', the team are allowed to play almost without consequences. Pietersen would have thrived in this environment


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: RedRag on Saturday, February 24, 2024, 16:01:38
I still think the ability to play traditional test plodding and bazball would work best. Like a 30:70 blend. Occasionally a player needs to just plod along and get a double century over the course of near all day innings, other times a quick rush of T20 style powerplay thrashing is needed.

I honestly think several years ago, Kevin Pietersen was that type of pioneering cricketer. His face didn't fit {even though he was a bit of a dick but the likes of Strauss or Gooch didn't want him around}, mostly because he didn't think Alastair Cook should have been Captain {there's no doubt Cook was a great Cricketer, but like many who take on a Captaincy - it impacted his form; similarly with Root too} and English cricket, whilst somewhat peaking at test level, wasn't really progressive in style. People used to be shocked/excited/unsure whenever KP decided to let the shackles off and reverse sweep every third ball.

I think the difference today is, KP knew with applying that approach that there was consequences but today with ''Bazball'', the team are allowed to play almost without consequences. Pietersen would have thrived in this environment
Pietersen had many admirers.  Everyone on occasion.  But he was Marmite and whenever his attempts to reverse momentum failed, there were plenty of detractors waiting to pounce.  And a number were in positions of influence.

But yeah, Pietersen and Bazball...a shame they never overlapped.

Let's hope Root can remain appreciated in a reverse scenario.  He does in this Test!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, February 25, 2024, 07:59:30
I still think the ability to play traditional test plodding and bazball would work best. Like a 30:70 blend. Occasionally a player needs to just plod along and get a double century over the course of near all day innings, other times a quick rush of T20 style powerplay thrashing is needed.

I honestly think several years ago, Kevin Pietersen was that type of pioneering cricketer. His face didn't fit {even though he was a bit of a dick but the likes of Strauss or Gooch didn't want him around}, mostly because he didn't think Alastair Cook should have been Captain {there's no doubt Cook was a great Cricketer, but like many who take on a Captaincy - it impacted his form; similarly with Root too} and English cricket, whilst somewhat peaking at test level, wasn't really progressive in style. People used to be shocked/excited/unsure whenever KP decided to let the shackles off and reverse sweep every third ball.

I think the difference today is, KP knew with applying that approach that there was consequences but today with ''Bazball'', the team are allowed to play almost without consequences. Pietersen would have thrived in this environment

Gonna go a bit ‘stream of consciousness’ now (something you know well 😉).

I believe the concept of Bazball is going to evolve from now onwards, with a constant nod to how it started. It began as a reaction to the constant negative performances of the team, where we dull, predictable, and almost always nailed on to lose. When Bazzy and Stokesy took over we had to go all out aggression, regardless of the circumstances, because we were and had to be willing to lose while swinging because it was better to lose that way than by being timid. But as it happened, we started to win playing that way, a lot.

But somewhere in between, Root got stuck. He was not playing his natural game, which was fine while it was working, but he got in a rut and started to lose confidence and was getting out consistently playing Bazball shots at the wrong time. Then it clicked. He realised what Bazball is actually about is not being aggressive when it isn’t warranted, instead it’s about being confident playing your natural game knowing your peers, your captain and your coach will back you to play that way 100%. Lo and behold, he makes a remarkably ‘Rooty’ century and put us in a great position to win this test.

Bazball is a phenomenon. Players in that system will make mistakes while it evolves, but they’ll know that’s absolutely fine, and it’ll work for them when the time is right. That’s what we’ve seen during this series. Long may it continue.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, February 25, 2024, 08:06:39
Just realised that hardly anything I just said was relevant to the post of yours that I referred to. But I suspect you’ll appreciate it anyway!

As for KP, he’s my most favouritist English batsman ever. Bar none. When he was in form, he was something else. I love him, despite his missteps. He’d have absolutely thrived in this team. Fortunately, I think we have a replacement, in terms of batting style if not personality, in Harry Brook. That boy is the future of English batting. Really wish he was a part of this tour.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, February 25, 2024, 08:58:07
England making a bit of a Horlicks of this. Pitch is tough, but it's not as bad as we're making it look and you'd fancy Jaiswal will get half of these on his own.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, February 25, 2024, 09:45:51
Great opportunity here for Foakesey to cement his place as England’s unsung hero. By which I mean he should become our sung hero. Wait, what? Not sure where I’m going with this.

Go Ben Foakes.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Quagmire on Sunday, February 25, 2024, 09:50:49
Great opportunity here for Foakesey to cement his place as England’s unsung hero. By which I mean he should become our sung hero. Wait, what? Not sure where I’m going with this.

Go Ben Foakes.

He’s so bloody good, I’m very much of the opinion we would have won the Ashes with him behind the stumps.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Robinz on Sunday, February 25, 2024, 10:01:47
There no substitute for skill.
Australia and India are currently so far ahead of the rest.
Went and witnessed Australia give NZ a real doing over in a 20 over match the other night at Eden Park... just so professional.




Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Qunk on Sunday, February 25, 2024, 10:10:35
He’s so bloody good, I’m very much of the opinion we would have won the Ashes with him behind the stumps.

Agreed. He’s a brilliant player.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, February 25, 2024, 10:18:35
There no substitute for skill.
Australia and India are currently so far ahead of the rest.
Went and witnessed Australia give NZ a real doing over in a 20 over match the other night at Eden Park... just so professional.

Full strength India are sure. The team for this test is missing Kohli, Rahul, Pant, Bumrah and Shami and I think it's pretty well matched with England. This series has been competitive!


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Ides of March on Sunday, February 25, 2024, 10:27:39
Full strength India are sure. The team for this test is missing Kohli, Rahul, Pant, Bumrah and Shami and I think it's pretty well matched with England. This series has been competitive!

Maybe more competitive than previous tours, but it still includes a 100 run loss in Visag and a mauling in Rajkot. Shows how good India are at home


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, March 7, 2024, 10:07:41
It was going fairly well when I woke up at 130/2... I might go back to sleep.


Title: Re: Cricket
Post by: JoeMezz on Thursday, March 7, 2024, 10:30:50
Middle order is not good enough. If he wasn't captain, I would say Stokes place in the side is under threat. I think it's time for Bairstow to move on too.