Thetownend.com

25% => The Reg Smeeton Match Day Action/Reaction Forum => Topic started by: tans on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 09:50:02



Title: City friendly
Post by: tans on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 09:50:02
Today’s XI:

1️⃣ Matej Kovar
2️⃣4️⃣ Rob Hunt
6️⃣ Mathieu Baudry
3️⃣ Zeki Fryers
1️⃣4️⃣ Ellis Iandolo
4️⃣2️⃣ Anthony Grant
1️⃣9️⃣ Jordan Lyden
1️⃣0️⃣ Michael Doughty
7️⃣ Diallang Jaiyesimi
9️⃣ Tyler Smith
1️⃣1️⃣ Jack Payne

Substitutes:

1️⃣2️⃣ Archie Matthews
4️⃣5️⃣ Toby Holland
2️⃣1️⃣ Dion Conroy
3️⃣0️⃣ Luke Haines


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: tans on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 09:50:35
Strong team that


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 09:54:26
So who’s keeping against Brentford


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Riddick on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 09:56:35
A decent split of players really.

Assuming Broadbent is the only injured part then for Brentford we have

Caddis, Reid (yes he is bad), Odimayo and one other CB.
Palmer, M Smith and probably Ireland
Hope, J Smith (maybe) and possibly a CF trial.



Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 09:58:22
City’s line up looks tasty



Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Panda Paws on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 10:00:39
Brentford friendly is a more strict media blackout so a trialist/newbie or two hopefully. Well defo a GK anyway.

Also RW said Brentford are playing a side full of potentially loans. I really want us to sign Marcus Forss


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 10:04:39
Today’s XI:

1️⃣ Matej Kovar
2️⃣4️⃣ Rob Hunt
6️⃣ Mathieu Baudry
3️⃣ Zeki Fryers
1️⃣4️⃣ Ellis Iandolo
4️⃣2️⃣ Anthony Grant
1️⃣9️⃣ Jordan Lyden
1️⃣0️⃣ Michael Doughty
7️⃣ Diallang Jaiyesimi
9️⃣ Tyler Smith
1️⃣1️⃣ Jack Payne

Substitutes:

1️⃣2️⃣ Archie Matthews
4️⃣5️⃣ Toby Holland
2️⃣1️⃣ Dion Conroy
3️⃣0️⃣ Luke Haines


What a tasty fixture i do miss playing them more than the other lot along the A420


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Ginginho on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 10:08:58
Nice to see Conroy on the bench


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 10:10:59
Nice to see Conroy on the bench

Let's hope he comes on for 10/20'miniutes as playing on that pitch will really pick his confidence up


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 10:12:24
Yes, definitely good to see Conroy on the bench. We really do need another striker though (yes I know...stating the obvious)


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Frigby Daser on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 10:12:54
So we have 3 subs, to their 10. Good 90 min workout for our XI!


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 10:15:24
So we have 3 subs, to their 10. Good 90 min workout for our XI!


That's because the others are getting ready for Brentford at 3pm so our doing not theirs


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Frigby Daser on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 10:20:58

That's because the others are getting ready for Brentford at 3pm so our doing not theirs

Yep, realise that. Just making the point that in the 2nd half, they’ll have fresh legs and we won’t.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: bathford on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 10:22:19
This has probably been asked already. But, is this game being streamed?


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: tans on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 10:30:51
No it isnt, surprisingly, considering how obsessed their social media admin appears to be about this game


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 10:31:23
Yep, realise that. Just making the point that in the 2nd half, they’ll have fresh legs and we won’t.


Agreed! Also why the 12 o'clock kick off as it's not as if they can get back for the Brentford game


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: bathford on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 10:32:48
Cheers Tans.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: pauld on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 10:38:57

Agreed! Also why the 12 o'clock kick off as it's not as if they can get back for the Brentford game
Maybe so Wellens can get back and see most if not all of it? (Depending on how long he takes on post-match team talk)


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Nijholts Nuts on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 10:39:52
So the only coverage of the Bristol City friendly is the STFC Twitter feed?


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 10:41:07
Maybe so Wellens can get back and see most if not all of it? (Depending on how long he takes on post-match team talk)


I guess if he's driving he will most of the Brentford game


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: stfcben on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 10:46:53
Said in an interview the other day he may leave early and try to catch a bit of Blackpool's friendly


I guess if he's driving he will most of the Brentford game


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Private Fraser on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 10:48:26
From their Twitter feed just now.   WTF?



"The teams will compete in two 50-minute halves."

#BRCSWI



Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: TheDukeOfBanbury on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 10:52:32
Nice to see Conroy on the bench

Indeed. The lad has come through some tough times and great to see him back.
Evidently has looked excellent in training.


Title: City friendly
Post by: Batch on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 10:54:46
Wellens talked about needing that breakthrough mental moment, a tackleb it something that makes him realise it's all ok.

not surprised though, an injury like that you are going to be nervous as hell at every twinge and impact


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 10:59:42
So the only coverage of the Bristol City friendly is the STFC Twitter feed?
They are following it with a text commentary on BristolLive


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 11:07:31
City 1 Swindon 0


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 11:08:46
City 1 Swindon 0
Grant og possibly...


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 11:10:49
Baudry off. Conroy on.

Hope it’s not injury.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Riddick on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 11:12:31
Baudry off. Conroy on.

Hope it’s not injury.

Thats the only reason it will be. Hopefully just protecting him.

Our CB's are all injury magnets. The lad Odimayo is going to be playing a lot!


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 11:15:55
Grant og possibly...
Weimann according to BristolLive


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 11:17:15
Baudry - Hammy


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: pauld on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 11:17:24

I guess if he's driving he will most of the Brentford game
12pm kick off, finished by about 2, gives time to get back to the CG for 3pm kick off, albeit not much wiggle room


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 11:20:29
“Good foul by Morrell”
Quote from BristolLive commentary - nice to see some good old Shitty fair play shining though!


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: REDBUCK on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 11:23:08
Give or take a extinction rebellion protest or two.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 11:29:49
2 good chances for DJ


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 11:46:13
Apparently even though the teams had agreed to play 50 mins each half, the referee blew for half time after 45. Right up there with my standards!


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Berniman on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 11:47:15
Wellens said in TOTT that he is driving up to Stoke after the game to watch Blackpool


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: china red on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 11:49:18
Is this being shown on YouTube?


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 12:01:27
Interesting to see the live blog differences between Bristol Post and Town Twitter feed. Looks like different games!


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 12:01:56
Another good save from Bentley to deny Doughty

1-1 Payne


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 12:08:50
#HoldenOut


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 12:12:29
Conroy off

Not injured!


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Batch on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 12:21:00
Quote from: pauld
Quote
I guess if he's driving he will most of the Brentford game
12pm kick off, finished by about 2, gives time to get back to the CG for 3pm kick off, albeit not much wiggle room


he's off to at Stoke v Blackpool


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 12:23:58
12pm kick off, finished by about 2, gives time to get back to the CG for 3pm kick off, albeit not much wiggle room


he's off to at Stoke v Blackpool

He must be scouting a Stoke player then a short trip back to Manchester


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 12:24:25
Guess where the comments come from:

Goal! Bristol City 1-1 Swindon (Payne)

Version 1:
That was a soft one. The ball was bobbling around the penalty area and Payne, standing almost totally still, just lofted a left-footed attempt over Bentley.

Good finish but poor defending.

Version 2:

Jack Payne bursts into the box and then finds himself with his back to goal, he turns and loops a curling effort over Bentley and evens things up!



Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 12:25:25
He must be scouting a Stoke player then a short trip back to Manchester
We’ve got Blackpool away soon


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 12:31:46
We’ve got Blackpool away soon


Yes very true 😁


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: river monster on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 12:32:29
Conroy off

Not injured!

Do we know who replaced him? Or do you mean sent off?!


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: tans on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 12:33:49
Luke Haines came on for him


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 12:34:14
All over.  1-1.  Jack Payne


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: river monster on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 12:35:10
Luke Haines came on for him
Ta


Title: City friendly
Post by: Batch on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 12:35:51
Quote
He must be scouting a Stoke player then a short trip back to Manchester
nah, it's because we play them soon. he went to a friendly not realising the cup match was today and so they rested players, this making his trip  pointless.

that's what he said anyway


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 12:37:08
Sounds like a good run out and decent performance. Both teams maybe 2/3 players short of what their likely starting XI would be.

Don’t suppose we’ll hear what side we put out against Brentford later.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 12:38:00
BristolLive final whistle summary:
“ Hmmm. Strange game that one. City started well, got their goal but then didn’t really assert any authority.

Swindon’s goal was a soft one to concede and, defensively, there were maybe some worrying gaps that a better team would exploit.

Still, all about minutes in the legs and developing the system.”


Title: Re: Re: City friendly
Post by: horlock07 on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 12:43:24
We’ve got Blackpool away soon
Why is he going to need to scout Blackpool he was training most of them on a daily basis last season.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: tans on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 12:44:56
Why is he going to need to scout Blackpool he was training most of them on a daily basis last season.

:D


Title: Re: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 12:53:17
Why is he going to need to scout Blackpool he was training most of them on a daily basis last season.
He might bring Jerry Yates back in the boot of his car.
🚘🚗🚘🚗🚘🚗


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Super Hans on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 12:53:26
Sounds a decent exercise with a few good chances created.

Confident we will get the striker required to complete the picture.

By biggest concern is centre half. Despite all being very good defenders; Baudry, Fryers and Conroy could all break down at any given moment and it does niggle away as something that could cost us as the season progresses.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: hefty toe on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 13:05:15
Sounds a decent exercise with a few good chances created.

Confident we will get the striker required to complete the picture.

By biggest concern is centre half. Despite all being very good defenders; Baudry, Fryers and Conroy could all break down at any given moment and it does niggle away as something that could cost us as the season progresses.

Agree entirely. Could see us having to play Odimayo and Grant at centre back.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Riddick on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 13:10:38
Agree entirely. Could see us having to play Odimayo and Grant at centre back.

You have to remember as Wellens as said before, the only reason we get the like of Fryers is because of his injury record. Hopefully one of the three is fit and can partner Odimayo, if not each other.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Super Hans on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 13:16:21
Agree entirely. Could see us having to play Odimayo and Grant at centre back.

Yeah this is my concern. We were decent enough at the back last season especially with the BFG in goal but most successful teams I'd wager have a first choice centre half pairing that play most games. It is a concern that we'll be unlikely to have that continuity. Hopefully we won't suffer too much for it against better attacking players this season.

I'm still expecting us to have a good season by the way.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: hefty toe on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 13:23:59
You have to remember as Wellens as said before, the only reason we get the like of Fryers is because of his injury record. Hopefully one of the three is fit and can partner Odimayo, if not each other.

Of course. I'm just not that comfortable having three centre backs with injury issues. Maybe we're not paying them very much. We were fortunate to a degree last season that REG was so good and instantly slotted in. Perhaps Grant will rise to the occasion at CB?


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Panda Paws on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 13:26:20
5 first team CBs relatively capable at this level (Odimayo unknown) plus Curran. No side needs 6 senior CBs.

If we need a 6th CB then we have the wrong CBs and shouldn’t have renewed Zeki and Baudry.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: hefty toe on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 13:30:28
5 first team CBs relatively capable at this level (Odimayo unknown) plus Curran. No side needs 6 senior CBs.

Yes on paper, but if Baudry, Conroy and Fryers are injured we will be very weak at CB which might very well happen. Don't think Curran is ready and Broadbent isn't L1 standard. Odimayo is unknown.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: donkey on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 13:42:33
We’ve got Blackpool away soon

We don't need to scout Blackpool, just watch a DVD of us last season.

Edit: Horlock said it earlier and better.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: REDBUCK on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 13:45:26
You're going to be a nervous wreck by October. We can't keep buying players for what might happen you have to make a decision at some point.

Ritchie and his team seem confortable with things so far.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Nijholts Nuts on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 14:09:42
Yeah this is my concern. We were decent enough at the back last season especially with the BFG in goal but most successful teams I'd wager have a first choice centre half pairing that play most games. It is a concern that we'll be unlikely to have that continuity. Hopefully we won't suffer too much for it against better attacking players this season.

I'm still expecting us to have a good season by the way.

Good point. The last time we did anything in League 1, we had a steady pairing of Greer and Cuthbert.


Title: Re: Re: City friendly
Post by: Benzel on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 14:19:55
Good point. The last time we did anything in League 1, we had a steady pairing of Greer and Cuthbert.
Stephens and Turnbull?

Sent from my CLT-L09


Title: Re: Re: City friendly
Post by: Costanza on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 14:23:58
Stephens and Turnbull?

Sent from my CLT-L09

2014-15 STFC PLAYER OF THE SEASON JORDAN TURNBULL WAS SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT THOUGH


Title: Re: Re: City friendly
Post by: RedRag on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 14:25:59
2014-15 STFC PLAYER OF THE SEASON JORDAN TURNBULL WAS SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT THOUGH
compared to Stephens and when played at wing back, perhaps.  But the two made a good pairing first time round.

Remember, at STFC at least, Cuthbert turned to shit without Greer


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Super Hans on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 14:28:05
Didn't they play in a three with Nath or have I made that up? Visions of Nath bringing the ball out into midfield starting moves (and also giving the ball away on occasions).


Title: Re: Re: City friendly
Post by: Benzel on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 14:42:58
Didn't they play in a three with Nath or have I made that up? Visions of Nath bringing the ball out into midfield starting moves (and also giving the ball away on occasions).
Yeah you're right, as soon as I posted it u remembered we played 352

Sent from my CLT-L09


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Panda Paws on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 15:46:27
Yes on paper, but if Baudry, Conroy and Fryers are injured we will be very weak at CB which might very well happen. Don't think Curran is ready and Broadbent isn't L1 standard. Odimayo is unknown.

If any team’s first 3 CBs are injured they’re in trouble. Grant can do a job there too.

Again, if we need a 6th CB we’ve got the wrong CBs.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: tans on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 15:47:37
2-1 FT score vs Brentford


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Peter Venkman on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 15:50:17
2-1 FT score vs Brentford
Any idea of the line ups for that game mate?

I can't see them online anywhere.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Peter Venkman on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 15:58:24
Hope and Twine scored.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 15:58:57
Hope and Twine scored.

Rope & Twine! You’re taking the piss 🤣🤣

Edit. Unless you’re stringing us all along.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: donkey on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 16:00:55
Rope & Twine! You’re taking the piss 🤣🤣

Edit. Unless you’re stringing us all along.

Spinning us a yarn, I reckon.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 16:09:13
Spinning us a yarn, I reckon.

They’ll cotton on soon enough.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: tans on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 16:19:41
Caddis, M Smith, Odomayo played from the pictures i saw


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Peter Venkman on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 16:25:01
Caddis, M Smith, Odomayo played from the pictures i saw
Yeah thats the only players I saw int he pics, along with Ken Richards.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Peter Venkman on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 16:25:48
Rope & Twine! You’re taking the piss 🤣🤣

Edit. Unless you’re stringing us all along.
Hope and Twine sounds like a pub.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Private Fraser on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 16:38:50
Yeah thats the only players I saw int he pics, along with Ken Richards.

There's also a blurry, dark-haired goalkeeper in the Hallam Hope/Matt Smith pic if anyone can put a name to him.

Edit:  Here's the line-up:

Swindon Town: Fryer, Curran, Cheshire, Odimayo, Giamattei, Palmer, Charles, Hope, Matthews, J. Smith, M. Smith,

Subs: Twine, Reid, Caddis

https://www.brentfordfc.com/news/2020/august/match-report-for-swindon-town-vs-brentford-on-29-aug-20/


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Peter Venkman on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 16:51:35
Cheers.

Could be Joe Fryer the Middlesborough keeper in goal?

Young keeper with a few injuries been out on loan to a few clubs.

(https://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Joe+Fryer+Carlisle+United+vs+Northampton+Town+T60vTy5Chg5l.jpg)

https://www.brentfordfc.com/news/2020/august/match-report-for-swindon-town-vs-brentford-on-29-aug-20/

Quote


Brentford B fell to a 2-1 pre-season defeat away from home to Swindon Town.

A first half goal from Joe Adams was cancelled out by Hallam Hope and the winner came not long before the break courtesy of Archie Matthews.

Neil MacFarlane had a strong number of players to choose from in a squad which featured First Team player Shandon Baptiste, who played the first 45 minutes. There were also first Brentford B minutes of the season for Fredrik Hammar after his pursuits at St George's Park earlier in the week. There was also a debut for young Frenchman Tristan Crama who came off the bench in the second period and looked assured.

It was the home side who began to see more of the ball in the opening 10 minutes, but Brentford B forced the first real chance on the counterattack. As The Bees broke at speed, Shandon Baptiste slotted the ball into the path of Aaron Pressley, whose curled effort was well saved by the Town keeper.

The lively Baptiste would then try his luck from the edge of the area, but his right-footed shot edged just wide of the left-hand post.

Jonny Smith then forced Patrik Gunnarsson into a fantastic save around the 15-minute mark when he was found just inside the box before a thumping effort from close range, which seemed destined for the net, was palmed away superbly by the young shot stopper.

The Bees then took the lead in superb fashion when Joe Adams picked the ball up from distance and jinked inside before driving forwards and curling an exquisite low effort into the far corner to make it 1-0.

Taylor Curran would put the ball in at the back post following a deflected cross from the right but for the offside flag. Swindon wouldn’t have to wait long for a response when Hallam Hope finished following a Brentford mistake as they conceded possession high up the field and the home side finished ruthlessly from close range.

With half an hour gone Swindon managed to push themselves in front when a long diagonal out to the right found Jonny Smith who whipped a cross in at pace and Archie Matthews did well to cushion the ball with his side foot first time high into the net to make it 2-1 to the home side.

Despite falling behind, Brentford B continued to look bright in attack, and they almost made it 2-2 when one of the Brentford trialists was found in space on the edge of the area but his thunderous effort edged just wide as it crashed against the advertising hoardings behind.

Jonny Smith continued to threaten down the Swindon right and he almost got Swindon’s third when he cut inside a fired an effort towards goal, but he could only find the crossbar as it cannoned back into the area before the Brentford defenders scurried the ball away.

Ken Charles had a good chance shortly after the break for Swindon after a cross from the left managed to evade the Brentford defenders, but the forward’s first-time effort was just over Gunnarsson’s crossbar.

As the game crept towards the hour mark there were fewer chances, but Brentford did manage to create a good opening when one of the trialists passed inside to Julien Carre, and after beating one man, he curled left-footed, but his shot deflected behind for a corner.

A chance would fall to substitute Wraynel Hercules after Kane O'Connor rose at the back post to head across goal, but the winger was unable to get a clean connection as the home side battled back to clear.

Neil MacFarlane also made a number of changes with trialists given the opportunity to impress at The County Ground in the half an hour or so. Brentford continued to see a lot of the ball right up to the closing stages but were unable to find a way to equalise as it finished 2-1 to the hosts.

Swindon Town: Fryer, Curran, Cheshire, Odimayo, Giamattei, Palmer, Charles, Hope, Matthews, J. Smith, M. Smith,

Subs: Twine, Reid, Caddis

Brentford B: Gunnarsson, Koutsimouka, Read (Trialist, 60), Trialist (Crama, 60), Baptiste (Hercules, 45), Hammar (Trialist, 80), Pressley (Trialist, 60), Trialist (Carre, 60), Hockenhull (Trialist, 56), Adams, Stevens (O’Connor, 60)
Subs not used: Andersson



Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 16:54:25
Cheers.

Could be Joe Fryer the Middlesborough keeper in goal?

Young keeper with a few injuries been out on loan to a few clubs.

(https://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Joe+Fryer+Carlisle+United+vs+Northampton+Town+T60vTy5Chg5l.jpg)

https://www.brentfordfc.com/news/2020/august/match-report-for-swindon-town-vs-brentford-on-29-aug-20/

I thought that but he’s just joined Carlisle on loan apparently. Mind you, the report also said Archie Matthews scored


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: donkey on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 16:55:42
They’ll cotton on soon enough.

Cotton on? I'm afraid not.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Bob's Orange on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 16:56:11
Archie Matthews????


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 16:58:09
Isn’t he the youth keeper?


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 17:00:42
Cotton on? I'm afraid not.
Not on this thread, anyway.
 :D


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Private Fraser on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 17:06:56
Archie Matthews????

He was on the bench for the City game (first post on page 1). Must be a different Matthews.

The keeper in the Twitter pic does look a bit like Joe Fryer (even go the same white gloves  :) ).



Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Bob's Orange on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 17:09:14
He was on the bench for the City game (first post on page 1)

I know, I was questioning why he was reported to have scored our second goal against Brentford B!!


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Peter Venkman on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 17:09:45
I thought that but he’s just joined Carlisle on loan apparently. Mind you, the report also said Archie Matthews scored
He joined Carlisle on loan 2 years ago, are you sure?


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 17:16:48
Not really


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 17:28:32
He joined Carlisle on loan 2 years ago, are you sure?
He went there on loan on in 2018 and broke his leg. He's coming back from injury and went on trial to Carlisle. Played 60 mins in a 4-2 loss against Fleetwood. Think he let all 4 in.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Panda Paws on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 18:17:01
It was Fryer. It’s literally listed underneath on the quoted report from the Brentford site.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Delboy on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 18:18:51
https://www.facebook.com/bristolcityfc/videos/313501076537219/


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: JBZ on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 18:23:14
As mentioned previously, I am a fan of the kit worn by the home team.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 18:39:55
Hope and Twine sounds like a pub.

It does you’re right. Well there is a Hope and Anchor not far from you 😉


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Frigby Daser on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 20:10:55
https://www.facebook.com/bristolcityfc/videos/313501076537219/

That’s a good finish from Payne. If City had scored that, I’m pretty sure it would have been described in a more positive tone than “soft”. I’ve visited OTIB a bit this week after the Smith signing, and have been quite surprised by the fact they (a) think that we think they’re big rivals (!) and (b) think they’re a big deal in the Championship. They’re notable only for being one of the biggest cities in the UK to never have PL football, despite having a benefactor like Lansdown. They could do with getting over themselves.

Also interesting that Hunt and Iandolo started at full back. I would have had Fryers and Caddis, and am not a fan of Caddis with Hunt, as it lacks balance. Maybe Caddis has dropped down the pecking order.... maybe RW rates Iandolo? Guess we’ll find out next week.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: RWB Robin on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 20:16:22
Richie was quite clear on TofTT earlier in the week that we should not read anything into team selection for the two games, except that the team for Bristol would be stronger. 


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 20:36:53
Considering Town's goal was considered soft (it was actually a clever bit of awareness by Payne, in regards to keeper positioning and if he can reproduce that in a league match then he'll cause teams problems), what in the fuck was Brizzle's goal considered as then? Surely theirs was as soft as they come?!


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Costanza on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 20:45:12
It's funny because many City fans would disagree but a lot of the time the Bristol Post is essentially what many wanted the Adver to be for Town; Rose-tinted propaganda. The Post is not very impartial when it comes to its local clubs.

...and boy-oh-boy do they ever love a click-bait article.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 20:51:48
It's funny because many City fans would disagree but a lot of the time the Bristol Post is essentially what many wanted the Adver to be for Town; Rose-tinted propaganda. The Post is not very impartial when it comes to its local clubs.

...and boy-oh-boy do they ever love a click-bait article.

That's once you get past the advertisements and Bristol Rovers bias hence why city fans call it the evil post


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Panda Paws on Saturday, August 29, 2020, 22:02:23
That’s a good finish from Payne. If City had scored that, I’m pretty sure it would have been described in a more positive tone than “soft”. I’ve visited OTIB a bit this week after the Smith signing, and have been quite surprised by the fact they (a) think that we think they’re big rivals (!) and (b) think they’re a big deal in the Championship. They’re notable only for being one of the biggest cities in the UK to never have PL football, despite having a benefactor like Lansdown. They could do with getting over themselves.

Also interesting that Hunt and Iandolo started at full back. I would have had Fryers and Caddis, and am not a fan of Caddis with Hunt, as it lacks balance. Maybe Caddis has dropped down the pecking order.... maybe RW rates Iandolo? Guess we’ll find out next week.

Fryers is a CB. RW has said as much.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Nijholts Nuts on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 07:26:54
Considering Town's goal was considered soft (it was actually a clever bit of awareness by Payne, in regards to keeper positioning and if he can reproduce that in a league match then he'll cause teams problems), what in the fuck was Brizzle's goal considered as then? Surely theirs was as soft as they come?!
It looked like a Grant OG to me plus RW said we were down to 10 men on ToTT.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Peter Venkman on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 09:08:14
Our goal was far better than their goal, they managed to scramble in a goal and we crafted one with a sublime finish from Payne, seeing the keeper slightly off his line and chipping it in.

I know the Slavers had a couple of players missing but thats a decent result again a strong Shitty side.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 09:43:14
Our goal was far better than their goal, they managed to scramble in a goal and we crafted one with a sublime finish from Payne, seeing the keeper slightly off his line and chipping it in.

I know the Slavers had a couple of players missing but thats a decent result again a strong Shitty side.
I'm sure that will have been the case with our side as well when we see the starting line up on 12/9..


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Peter Venkman on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 09:54:24
I'm sure that will have been the case with our side as well when we see the starting line up on 12/9..
Oh I am sure we will, next weekend will give us a clue of how we really are shaping up against a struggling Charlton side who are having some huge problems in recruiting new players.

https://youtu.be/1tI8c6i63gU

Charltons frienly from yesterday, acres of space in that defence a lot of the time, yes Palace are decent but there are more holes than Swiss cheese.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: JBZ on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 09:56:37
But, as suggested elsewhere, there is perhaps only so much you can take from friendly fixtures.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Peter Venkman on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 10:07:49
But, as suggested elsewhere, there is perhaps only so much you can take from friendly fixtures.
Thanks for you input.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 10:13:46
But, as suggested elsewhere, there is perhaps only so much you can take from friendly fixtures.
I'm sure that's the invisible asterisk that everyone puts next to any comments they make about pre-season...i.e. "it's only pre-season but"...everyone knows that but they're still going to pass comment about team selection and individual and team performances.

Yes, "it's only pre-season" and not too much should be read into it but it's not totally meaningless either.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: JBZ on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 10:32:46
I'm sure that's the invisible asterisk that everyone puts next to any comments they make about pre-season...i.e. "it's only pre-season but"...everyone knows that but they're still going to pass comment about team selection and individual and team performances.

Yes, "it's only pre-season" and not too much should be read into it but it's not totally meaningless either.

Yes and, as suggested on other threads, it will be interesting to see whether the pre season will have any impact on first team selection.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 15:07:52
Nahhh, we will tear a new one out of every team in L1 in the season  ;)


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Ardiles on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 19:43:51
City 1 Swindon 0

Bit of a tangent, so pls bear with me. But I hate this. Calling Bristol City 'City' & us 'Swindon' feels all wrong to me. The 'City' bit implies familiarity...as in, there is only one City. Forget Manchester, Birmingham, Cardiff, Hull. The only 'City' that matters is Bristol. Referring to BCFC as simply 'City' feels (to me, anyway) like you're being pally with them.

And by contrast, we're 'Swindon' and not 'Town'. I just don't like it. Am I completely alone here? We had a friendly game a few yrs ago vs Southampton and posters in the matchday thread consistently called them 'Saints'. Drove me nuts. But must be just me, I expect.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Ardiles on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 19:47:23
Appreciate that we're distinguishing them with Bristol Rovers, but I still don't like it. Bristol City, for me. They're nothing special.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 19:47:52
Bit of a tangent, so pls bear with me. But I hate this. Calling Bristol City 'City' & us 'Swindon' feels all wrong to me. The 'City' bit implies familiarity...as in, there is only one City. Forget Manchester, Birmingham, Cardiff, Hull. The only 'City' that matters is Bristol. Referring to BCFC as simply 'City' feels (to me, anyway) like you're being pally with them.

And by contrast, we're 'Swindon' and not 'Town'. I just don't like it. Am I completely alone here? We had friendly game a few yrs ago vs Southampton and posters in the matchday thread consistently called them 'Saints'. Drove me nuts. But must be just me, I expect.

Calling them City sounds wrong but acceptable compaired to slave traders


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Super Hans on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 19:52:45
Bit of a tangent, so pls bear with me. But I hate this. Calling Bristol City 'City' & us 'Swindon' feels all wrong to me. The 'City' bit implies familiarity...as in, there is only one City. Forget Manchester, Birmingham, Cardiff, Hull. The only 'City' that matters is Bristol. Referring to BCFC as simply 'City' feels (to me, anyway) like you're being pally with them.

And by contrast, we're 'Swindon' and not 'Town'. I just don't like it. Am I completely alone here? We had a friendly game a few yrs ago vs Southampton and posters in the matchday thread consistently called them 'Saints'. Drove me nuts. But must be just me, I expect.

You're definitely over thinking it but then it annoys me when Swindon fans predict Oxford to do well. There's been a couple I've seen on here putting them in a season accumulator to get promoted which irrationally winds me up, probably in a similar way to what you describe.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Costanza on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 19:54:32
Appreciate that we're distinguishing them with Bristol Rovers, but I still don't like it. Bristol City, for me. They're nothing special.

I agree with the wider principle, but I'm okay with City vs. Town when it's clearly within a thread about a game between Bristol City and Swindon Town!


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 19:56:38
Bit of a tangent, so pls bear with me. But I hate this. Calling Bristol City 'City' & us 'Swindon' feels all wrong to me. The 'City' bit implies familiarity...as in, there is only one City. Forget Manchester, Birmingham, Cardiff, Hull. The only 'City' that matters is Bristol. Referring to BCFC as simply 'City' feels (to me, anyway) like you're being pally with them.

And by contrast, we're 'Swindon' and not 'Town'. I just don't like it. Am I completely alone here? We had a friendly game a few yrs ago vs Southampton and posters in the matchday thread consistently called them 'Saints'. Drove me nuts. But must be just me, I expect.
Agree completely...

Calling them City sounds wrong but acceptable compaired to slave traders
Slave Traders is perfect...


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 19:57:10

And by contrast, we're 'Swindon' and not 'Town'. I just don't like it. Am I completely alone here? We had a friendly game a few yrs ago vs Southampton and posters in the matchday thread consistently called them 'Saints'. Drove me nuts. But must be just me, I expect.

I agree with you except for this bit when talking about the team we support. I know it is hypocritical to say but it is "jovial hypocrisy" I guess?! I know that doesn't make it technically correct but to me there really is only one "Town".

I agree though that when talking about another team or if both teams are totally impartial to me, then they are <<ins full team name>>. Mind you, sometimes I'll just give them a totally different name, usually a metaphorical one...something like Polaris Boars (have fun working that one out) or Shoemaker FC.

 :pint:


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 19:58:13
Oh, and you pernickety cunt  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: JBZ on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 20:05:54
I will usually refer to STFC as Swindon rather than Town. But I also feel uncomfortable with referring to the club as 'us' or 'we'.  I find it a bit cringe, not entirely sure why. 


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Ardiles on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 20:06:18
Oh, and you pernickety cunt  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:

I'm so glad you think so. I know I am. : )


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 20:13:28
I'm so glad you think so. I know I am. : )

I was definitely joking  :D But for the purposes of the TEF, I'm not  ;)


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 20:17:23
I was definitely joking  :D But for the purposes of the TEF, I'm not  ;)
An awful lot of hot air being wasted above.  For the purposes of TEF Bristol City are all cunts. 
There. Done.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 20:21:59
An awful lot of hot air being wasted above.  For the purposes of TEF Bristol City are all cunts. 
There. Done.

I'm not having a fuckin Ref tell me what to do!  :D There, I'm sure you feel more at home now.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 20:43:25
imagine if Swindon ever got City status and the Townend started singing come on city😡


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: donkey on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 21:52:09
Bit of a tangent, so pls bear with me. But I hate this. Calling Bristol City 'City' & us 'Swindon' feels all wrong to me. The 'City' bit implies familiarity...as in, there is only one City. Forget Manchester, Birmingham, Cardiff, Hull. The only 'City' that matters is Bristol. Referring to BCFC as simply 'City' feels (to me, anyway) like you're being pally with them.

And by contrast, we're 'Swindon' and not 'Town'. I just don't like it. Am I completely alone here? We had a friendly game a few yrs ago vs Southampton and posters in the matchday thread consistently called them 'Saints'. Drove me nuts. But must be just me, I expect.

A mutual friend has married a Grimsby fan. Town takes on a whole new meaning.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 21:56:42
A mutual friend has married a Grimsby fan. Town takes on a whole new meaning.

Imagine if Hollowhead was best man😁


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Sunday, August 30, 2020, 23:32:16
I'm not having a fuckin Ref tell me what to do!  :D There, I'm sure you feel more at home now.
I’ve just spent two hours looking for my Red Card, but unfortunately it seems to be in one of those very safe places that I can’t remember.  It’s an age thing. So I’ll revert back to my old reffing style, and simply tell you to piss off.  Nobody plays on my pitch wearing a fucking beanie hat, unless it’s red and white with a bobble.



Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Monday, August 31, 2020, 00:25:26
I’ve just spent two hours looking for my Red Card, but unfortunately it seems to be in one of those very safe places that I can’t remember.  It’s an age thing. So I’ll revert back to my old reffing style, and simply tell you to piss off.  Nobody plays on my pitch wearing a fucking beanie hat, unless it’s red and white with a bobble.



##You're not fit enough to hold the cards! You're not fit to hold the fuck-in cards!##

FA Referee Report Rating:
He didn't even have any cards with him.
The tea lady was most upset as it was her birthday!
4/10

Advisory:
Referee's Assistant agrees that wearing glasses may help.
Suggest this Referee be demoted to tier 29 (twenty-nine).
Must pay all player fines for cards issued without a card shown.
With immediate effect.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Monday, August 31, 2020, 07:12:17
##You're not fit enough to hold the cards! You're not fit to hold the fuck-in cards!##

FA Referee Report Rating:
He didn't even have any cards with him.
The tea lady was most upset as it was her birthday!
4/10

Advisory:
Referee's Assistant agrees that wearing glasses may help.
Suggest this Referee be demoted to tier 29 (twenty-nine).
Must pay all player fines for cards issued without a card shown.
With immediate effect.

Harsh!  Now, where’re my glasses?


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Valid Pint on Monday, August 31, 2020, 08:21:18
An awful lot of hot air being wasted above.  For the purposes of TEF Bristol City are all cunts. 
There. Done.
Agreed. As are Bristol Rovers. All Bristol cunts.

We are Swindon.

My pet hate is people referring to Spurs. The club is Tottenham Hotspur. I refer to them as Tottenham.

But don't get me started on Barca.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Monday, August 31, 2020, 08:26:11
Agreed. As are Bristol Rovers. All Bristol cunts.

We are Swindon.

My pet hate is people referring to Spurs. The club is Tottenham Hotspur. I refer to them as Tottenham.

But don't get me started on Barca.

How about Oxford, then?


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Valid Pint on Monday, August 31, 2020, 08:47:41
Oxford City or Oxford United?


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Monday, August 31, 2020, 10:01:36
Oxford City or Oxford United?

When you get down to it, there’s surely no difference, is there?


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Valid Pint on Monday, August 31, 2020, 10:59:53
Well, I call Oxford City "town" as in town versus gown.

I call Oxford United yellow, piss-stain ridden, pension-stealing, banana-wielding inbreds from the ass end of Headington.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Monday, August 31, 2020, 11:02:27
Well, I call Oxford City "town" as in town versus gown.

I call Oxford United yellow, piss-stain ridden, pension-stealing, banana-wielding inbreds from the ass end of Headington.
Fuck me, don’t praise them too much, will you!


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Valid Pint on Monday, August 31, 2020, 11:04:31
The only time I saw Don Rogers play was at Oxford City's old ground.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Monday, August 31, 2020, 11:20:52
The only time I saw Don Rogers play was at Oxford City's old ground.
My recollections of The Don go right through his career for Swindon, and God he was a lazy player. 
He would often be totally invisible for 99% of a game, but in the remaining couple of minutes ...... it was poetry in motion. He and an overlapping John Trollope could produce a goal from absolutely nowhere in just seconds, and his finishing (when at his best) was incredible.  The only current equivalent I can think of is the way Liverpool break from the back at full speed (although in fairness Arsenal with Aubameyang are doing it too).  Rogers was a class above the level at with Swindon were playing, but was found out when he moved away from the County Ground.  Great memories, though.
 :pint:


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Valid Pint on Monday, August 31, 2020, 11:26:38
You must be a really old bastard then.

I saw him play for The Falcon in the FA Pub Cup or similar.



Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Monday, August 31, 2020, 11:32:41
Delighted to say I saw him in his pomp.

Nobody has gotten close since.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Riddick on Monday, August 31, 2020, 11:43:54
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxrnJkQORcI&feature=emb_logo

Never signing the striker Ken based on this.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Monday, August 31, 2020, 11:47:07
Delighted to say I saw him in his pomp.

Nobody has gotten close since.
There are at least two of us really old bastards on here then!   :)


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Monday, August 31, 2020, 11:49:32
Yup!


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Peter Venkman on Monday, August 31, 2020, 11:56:42
From that video it appears...

Jonny Smith looks very handy wide right and cutting inside.

Disappointing the way the Brentford scorer waltzed through our defence without a challenge and scored with a fairly soft finish.

Richards looks like a bit of a barn door Billy in front of goal.

Fryer looks pretty decent in goal, certainly be a good back up.

Twine finished really well from a Jonny Smith cross close in.

Hope looked like he did ok.

Also, who was the big built black defender/midfielder number 22 for us? didn't look like Reid.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, August 31, 2020, 11:57:35
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxrnJkQORcI&feature=emb_logo

Never signing the striker Ken based on this.

Cracking highlights against a decent young technical Brentford team


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: RobertT on Monday, August 31, 2020, 11:59:46
Agree with that, J Smith looks a bit like a cross between Pritchard and Ritchie when they played at this level for us.

Hope had some decent touches in those highlights, couple of good balls in and certainly has that strikers instinct in him as well.  I assume he has some issues playing through the middle, otherwise you'd think that is where he should play based on what we've seen so far.  Maybe not so good with his back to goal.

On the evidence thus far, Curran is not going to be with us too much longer, this is well above his level.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, August 31, 2020, 11:59:59
From that video it appears...

Jonny Smith looks very handy wide right and cutting inside.

Disappointing the way the Brentford scorer waltzed through our defence without a challenge and scored with a fairly soft finish.

Richards looks like a bit of a barn door Billy in front of goal.

Fryer looks pretty decent in goal, certainly be a good back up.

Twine finished really well from a Jonny Smith cross close in.

Hope looked like he did ok.

Also, who was the big built black defender/midfielder number 22 for us? didn't look like Reid.

I agree with everything apart from Fryer who didn't convince me


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Peter Venkman on Monday, August 31, 2020, 12:05:53
I agree with everything apart from Fryer who didn't convince me
My mate who was at the game said he looked pretty handy all game and had decent distribution too. I think he did what was needed e.g. getting his body in the way of shots, yes he made a couple of not great saves but when I look at him I would say hes better than Henry, Matthews and for that matter RCC and Moore when they were with us.

He would only be back up if he did sign though.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Monday, August 31, 2020, 12:06:08
From that video it appears...

Jonny Smith looks very handy wide right and cutting inside.

Disappointing the way the Brentford scorer waltzed through our defence without a challenge and scored with a fairly soft finish.

Richards looks like a bit of a barn door Billy in front of goal.

Fryer looks pretty decent in goal, certainly be a good back up.

Twine finished really well from a Jonny Smith cross close in.

Hope looked like he did ok.

Also, who was the big built black defender/midfielder number 22 for us? didn't look like Reid.
Presume it’s Odimayo


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Peter Venkman on Monday, August 31, 2020, 12:06:44
On the evidence thus far, Curran is not going to be with us too much longer, this is well above his level.
I agree, but he has just signed a new 3 year contract so will be at the club a while yet.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: RobertT on Monday, August 31, 2020, 12:08:21
I mean shipped out on loan, hopefully.  Unless something bizarre happens, I'd worry about using in him in games this season.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Peter Venkman on Monday, August 31, 2020, 12:09:24
Presume it’s Odimayo
No he was number 5 and hes quite tall and skinny, the number 22 was a large built bloke. I think it was Reid TBH hes just grown his hair a bit longer since he last played for us.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: molepar on Monday, August 31, 2020, 12:11:38
Who was number 14? Was it Smith? He looked very good


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Monday, August 31, 2020, 12:12:21
No he was number 5 and hes quite tall and skinny, the number 22 was a large built bloke. I think it was Reid TBH hes just grown his hair a bit longer since he last played for us.
Did he look like a footballer?


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Monday, August 31, 2020, 12:13:14
Rogers was a class above the level at with Swindon were playing, but was found out when he moved away from the County Ground. 
 

As is often the case on here, reality is somewhat different to what is posted.  The Don is still highly regarded by Palace fans of a certain age....


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: RobertT on Monday, August 31, 2020, 12:16:48
22 was Reid, playing right back with Caddis at left back, 14 was J Smith.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Peter Venkman on Monday, August 31, 2020, 12:22:47
Who was number 14? Was it Smith? He looked very good
Yes it was Jonny Smith.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Bob's Orange on Monday, August 31, 2020, 13:08:34
Cracking finish from Twine. A very strong pre-season showing from Twine who, given the current personnel deserves a place on the bench against Charlton at the very least.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, August 31, 2020, 13:10:19
Cracking finish from Twine. A very strong pre-season showing from Twine who, given the current personnel deserves a place on the bench against Charlton at the very least.

Grew goal and the keeper never even seen it. He definitely deserves a chance but many on here will disagree


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Bob's Orange on Monday, August 31, 2020, 13:12:47
Yes it was Jonny Smith.

He looks way more dangerous than Isgrove ever was in those positions. Albeit based on one pre-season friendly. Great left foot shot on him but can also cut back onto his right. Defenders are going to hate that.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, August 31, 2020, 13:14:00
He looks way more dangerous than Isgrove ever was in those positions. Albeit based on one pre-season friendly. Great left foot shot on him but can also cut back onto his right. Defenders are going to hate that.

Did he shine against us at home do Oldham


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Bob's Orange on Monday, August 31, 2020, 13:17:29
Did he shine against us at home do Oldham

Not a game I went to. Can’t even remember how we did against them to be honest.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Monday, August 31, 2020, 13:35:22
Cracking finish from Twine. A very strong pre-season showing from Twine who, given the current personnel deserves a place on the bench against Charlton at the very least.
Agreed - really good goal.  Reminiscent of Doyle (!!).  What that goal shows, though, is why Doyle got so many for us - it was the quality of the assist.  Town created stacks of brilliant chances last season, and if we continue to do that we could be unstoppable again.  Put the ball in the right place and in it goes.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Peter Venkman on Monday, August 31, 2020, 13:37:00
Did he shine against us at home do Oldham
He did play, he looked fairly handy from what I remember because I was told by a slavetrader mate to look out for him because he would tear us a new one if we allowed him to, but Oldham didn't create much all game against us.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, August 31, 2020, 13:40:36
He did play, he looked fairly handy from what I remember because I was told by a slavetrader mate to look out for him because he would tear us a new one if we allowed him to, but Oldham didn't create much all game against us.

Cheers Pete


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Monday, August 31, 2020, 13:44:41
As is often the case on here, reality is somewhat different to what is posted.  The Don is still highly regarded by Palace fans of a certain age....
I don’t know what you’re getting at, Reg.  I most certainly wasn’t being negative about Rogers.  What I meant was that at the level Swindon were playing at, opposing teams just couldn’t live with him when he turned it on.  They used to put two men on him just in case and that merely opened up spaces elsewhere, so even a quiet Don Rogers was making an important contribution. Against better opposition (and I saw him play twice for Palace), he was up against more capable defenders, and he usually had one stuck to him like glue.  This reduced his effectiveness even though his on-the-ball skills were second to none.  He’s still my hero!


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Peter Venkman on Monday, August 31, 2020, 13:48:47
Cheers Pete
No problem :)

Here are the highlights, he makes a couple of decent passes but otherwise Oldham created little of note.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8HEg0Pb1ek&feature=emb_logo


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Super Hans on Monday, August 31, 2020, 13:49:28
Smith looks like he could be deadly from those highlights. Good dribbling, crossing and shooting. Give some full backs a torrid afternoon.

Edited to add: reminded me of a budget Mahrez.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Monday, August 31, 2020, 13:51:23
Smith looks like he could be deadly from those highlights. Good dribbling, crossing and shooting. Give some full backs a torrid afternoon.
Sort of an Isgrove++


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Peter Venkman on Monday, August 31, 2020, 13:57:02
Smith looks like he could be deadly from those highlights. Good dribbling, crossing and shooting. Give some full backs a torrid afternoon.

Edited to add: reminded me of a budget Mahrez.
The way he cuts inside and lets loose a left foot shot from the right reminds me a lot of Matt Ritchie too.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Monday, August 31, 2020, 14:26:32
Go Jonny Smith!  I think we’re impressed. COYR


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Monday, August 31, 2020, 14:29:06
The way he cuts inside and lets loose a left foot shot from the right reminds me a lot of Matt Ritchie too.


I was thinking more Riyad Mahrez😁


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Peter Venkman on Monday, August 31, 2020, 14:30:41

I was thinking more Riyad Mahrez😁
Matt Ritchie is better than him ;)


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Batch on Monday, August 31, 2020, 14:55:38
ok, just realised the city goals are up, lazy not reading back ..

good finish by Payne wasn't it. not quite how the Bristol post (or whatever) reported it :)


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Batch on Monday, August 31, 2020, 14:56:54
Quote from: JBZ
As mentioned previously, I am a fan of the kit worn by the home team.

Barney the dinosaur fan?


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Mother Brown on Monday, August 31, 2020, 15:01:04
ok, just realised the city goals are up, lazy not reading back ..

good finish by Payne wasn't it. not quite how the Bristol post (or whatever) reported it :)
Thank fuck it wasn't Roger Malone


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: RedRag on Tuesday, September 1, 2020, 10:22:04
I don’t know what you’re getting at, Reg.  I most certainly wasn’t being negative about Rogers.  What I meant was that at the level Swindon were playing at, opposing teams just couldn’t live with him when he turned it on.  They used to put two men on him just in case and that merely opened up spaces elsewhere, so even a quiet Don Rogers was making an important contribution. Against better opposition (and I saw him play twice for Palace), he was up against more capable defenders, and he usually had one stuck to him like glue.  This reduced his effectiveness even though his on-the-ball skills were second to none.  He’s still my hero!
He did drift out of games and it was said at the time that he didn't always show up away from home.  Obviously overlooking his threat on such days could be costly, so covering and marking him would always be a relative priority for opponents. 

Paul Reaney of the great Leeds side shut him up in an FAC 1/4 final at the CG once.

But he was discovered rather than found out at the top level, Geoff.  He scored 15 goals in 35 appearances as a winger in the top flight (to add to the 7 he had already scored for Town in 16 in the second tier).  It wasn't just the goals that continued as before however.  The Don's performances generated such excitement on a now national stage that there were tabloid calls for his England selection.  He remains a cult hero with older Palace fans to this day.

He won "goal of the season" but his performance against Man Utd was perhaps the epitome of the excitement he generated. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3QRi_oQ9mU



Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Tuesday, September 1, 2020, 10:35:48
Matt Ritchie is better than him ;)

But earns less money 🤣


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: horlock07 on Tuesday, September 1, 2020, 11:20:59
Cracking finish from Twine. A very strong pre-season showing from Twine who, given the current personnel deserves a place on the bench against Charlton at the very least.

TBH if he can't get on the bench in a league cup game there seems little point him being here (for either party)


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Tuesday, September 1, 2020, 11:33:42
He did drift out of games and it was said at the time that he didn't always show up away from home.  Obviously overlooking his threat on such days could be costly, so covering and marking him would always be a relative priority for opponents. 

Paul Reaney of the great Leeds side shut him up in an FAC 1/4 final at the CG once.

But he was discovered rather than found out at the top level, Geoff.  He scored 15 goals in 35 appearances as a winger in the top flight (to add to the 7 he had already scored for Town in 16 in the second tier).  It wasn't just the goals that continued as before however.  The Don's performances generated such excitement on a now national stage that there were tabloid calls for his England selection.  He remains a cult hero with older Palace fans to this day.

He won "goal of the season" but his performance against Man Utd was perhaps the epitome of the excitement he generated. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3QRi_oQ9mU



Nice one, Red!  I’d not seen those highlights before.  It brought back just how good he was, and that he was more of a team player than I remember.  And on a ploughed field as well!  Let us just agree that The Don was very special indeed! :clap:


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Jimmy HaveHave on Tuesday, September 1, 2020, 11:42:47
Nice one, Red!  I’d not seen those highlights before.  It brought back just how good he was, and that he was more of a team player than I remember.  And on a ploughed field as well!  Let us just agree that The Don was very special indeed! :clap:

Fantastic player and what would he be worth now🤔


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, September 1, 2020, 11:42:53
Nice one, Red!  I’d not seen those highlights before.  It brought back just how good he was, and that he was more of a team player than I remember.  And on a ploughed field as well!  Let us just agree that The Don was very special indeed! :clap:
I think its safe to say that his like has only really been seen twice in our 140 year history, the other being the great Harold Fleming.

It took 30 years to find Harold, it then took another 50 years to find Rogers, we are about due another one now.....


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Tuesday, September 1, 2020, 11:48:05
I think its safe to say that his like has only really been seen twice in our 140 year history, the other being the great Harold Fleming.

It took 30 years to find Harold, it then took another 50 years to find Rogers, we are about due another one now.....

It’s Scott Twine!! :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Tuesday, September 1, 2020, 12:48:08
It’s Scott Twine!! :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:

You get a Yellow card for that and I'm not even a ref! Everyone knows that he's already been and gone...it was of course Jamie Sendles-White  ;)


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Tuesday, September 1, 2020, 13:10:06
You get a Yellow card for that and I'm not even a ref! Everyone knows that he's already been and gone...it was of course Jamie Sendles-White  ;)
So, are you saying we’ve got to wait another 50 years? I won’t have any puff left to blow my whistle by then.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: RobertT on Tuesday, September 1, 2020, 13:46:49
Given our recent signings, Tom Smith's time has finally come, the Ginger Bobby Charlton.


Title: Re: City friendly
Post by: Geoff the Ref on Tuesday, September 1, 2020, 13:59:35
Given our recent signings, Tom Smith's time has finally come, the Ginger Bobby Charlton.

 :clap: