Thetownend.com

25% => The Reg Smeeton Match Day Action/Reaction Forum => Topic started by: Legends-Lounge on Thursday, May 9, 2019, 20:29:43



Title: Play Offs
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Thursday, May 9, 2019, 20:29:43
Newport draw level with The Stags 1-1 (85)

FT 1-1


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Friday, May 10, 2019, 09:30:14
I didn't watch it but hope Newport come out on top in the 2nd leg.

Seems Flitcroft is winning loads of friends in South Wales! from the Newport forum...

Quote
Hand on heart, never have I seen such a more vile team play here.
All they did was cheat, bleat and apply the dark arts all game and Flitcroft has the nerve to moan about the referee - who was absolute awful.
I'm glad we got the penalty decision and their crap following were crying hard done by.
It was karma for their teams lack of class.
We were slow starting but outplayed them second half and that equaliser will have crushed them.
All to play for - glad they have written us off.

100% agreed. They did it in January and last season at ours. Their number 6 is a big lad but goes down like a hooker down the docks every time somebody is within a yard of him.

Horrible footballing side. Thugs, bullies and play acting and time wasting like like I've never seen before. Almost every clearance ball they were making a conscious effort to boot the ball out of the stadium to waste time. Watching the highlights we had some great chances to win that game. We have nothing to fear up there.

Sadly such cheating and lack of integrity from both players and managers often gains rewards because of referees' lack of the b**** to penalise it.

They certainly went down very easily but were quick with a very "robust" challenge.
Lots of moaning, the importance of the game doesn't make for a beautiful game but they were constantly trying to con the officials in my opinion.

Flitcroft and his brother played that way also, disgrace to the game with their play-acting and bad sportsmanship. He was bombed out of Swinetown and had a big budget at Mansfield this year and really should've got them promoted automatically with the quality loanees (Walker and Grant) he's had this season.

Disgusting side , and up there with Lincoln when it comes to getting away with murder.

I always see them as the worst team in the league for this kind of thing.

What a horrific team in terms of fair play


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Ginginho on Friday, May 10, 2019, 09:32:50
I've done Villa, Charlton, and for some reason Newport in a treble.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Friday, May 10, 2019, 09:35:58
WBA, Pompey and Newport for me.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Saxondale on Friday, May 10, 2019, 09:43:56
Nice.  Glad Flitcroft left.

I presume he's still playing the knock it up to a striker with no ball control and see if it hits his knee and bounces off in the right direction style?


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Friday, May 10, 2019, 09:44:47
Nice.  Glad Flitcroft left.

I presume he's still playing the knock it up to a striker with no ball control and see if it hits his knee and bounces off in the right direction style?
He still plays similarly but now he has a fast striker with control who knows where the net is...hence why they are in the play offs and not where we are, 1 decent goal scorer.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Dr Pierre Chang on Friday, May 10, 2019, 09:47:34
He still plays similarly but now he has a fast striker with control who knows where the net is...hence why they are in the play offs and not where we are, 1 decent goal scorer.
*awaits Reg’s arrival in thread*

 ;)


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Friday, May 10, 2019, 09:51:39
*awaits Reg’s arrival in thread*

 ;)
You noticed ;)


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: horlock07 on Friday, May 10, 2019, 10:15:00
He still plays similarly but now he has a fast striker with control who knows where the net is...hence why they are in the play offs and not where we are, 1 decent goal scorer.

Isn't it two we need though and we won't buy them as we once failed to spend £200k on Rickie Lambert when Power wasn't here and despite him spending £350k on a player that's irrelevant, thus we are going to get relegated to Sunday league which I will then come on here and make much of telling you so?

Have I interpreted the misery correctly?  ;) :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, May 10, 2019, 10:18:27
He still plays similarly but now he has a fast striker with control who knows where the net is...hence why they are in the play offs and not where we are, 1 decent goal scorer.

No guarantees in football.... our best post war 20+ goal man for a season was Simon Cox with 29 in 08/09. We stayed up in Div 3 by winning at BHA with 5 games to go, and then sealing the deal with a battling point at Brunton Park with 3 to go.



Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Abrahammer on Friday, May 10, 2019, 10:26:39
5 of the 7 teams who won automatic promotion this season within the FL had a striker who scored 20+.

Amazing


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Friday, May 10, 2019, 10:29:22
Have I interpreted the misery correctly?  ;) :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:
No you are spot on :D


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, May 10, 2019, 10:32:09
5 of the 7 teams who won automatic promotion this season within the FL had a striker who scored 20+.

Amazing

And 12 didn't....


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Friday, May 10, 2019, 10:35:37
No guarantees in football.... our best post war 20+ goal man for a season was Simon Cox with 29 in 08/09. We stayed up in Div 3 by winning at BHA with 5 games to go, and then sealing the deal with a battling point at Brunton Park with 3 to go.
Horses for courses. We had a worse side over all back then than we do now. With 20 goals extra this season we would have got automatic promotion.

Cox scored 29 of our 68 goals, without his goals we would have been relegated with THE lowest goals total in the whole league of just 39 goals.....Cox saved us from relegation almost single handedly.

This season if we havd Cox score 29 goals then we would have scored 85 goals, more than anybody in this division....Cox (or similar) would have got us promoted.

Its really not rocket surgery to see that is it? or am I being Thicky McThick?


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Abrahammer on Friday, May 10, 2019, 10:37:14
And 12 didn't....

Probably because that was mathematically impossible for them all to do so.

Plenty of them are in the playoffs places as well. It’s almost as if there is a general correlation, no guarantee obviously, between league position and having 20+ goal striker.

Incredible really


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Exiled Bob on Friday, May 10, 2019, 10:38:16
And 12 didn't....
12 of the 7?😒


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Friday, May 10, 2019, 10:38:59
12 of the 7?😒
:D


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Flashheart on Friday, May 10, 2019, 10:48:24
So, if I have this right... some people are saying that having a player that will score more goals than others will increase their team's chance of being successful?

Bear with me if I'm being slow, it's a difficult concept to grasp.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Friday, May 10, 2019, 10:53:57
So, if I have this right... some people are saying that having a player that will score more goals than others will increase their team's chance of being successful?

Bear with me if I'm being slow, it's a difficult concept to grasp.
I think I may have missed something somewhere too. I thought that made perfect sense, but as I say I must be being Thicky McThick.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Friday, May 10, 2019, 10:55:15
Tbf, I think Reg is trying to say that having 3 players scoring 10 each is better than 1 scoring 30. So as the chances are low of picking up a prolific striker in L2 Wellens needs to improve Anderson and Woolery’s goal return.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, May 10, 2019, 10:58:17
Horses for courses. We had a worse side over all back then than we do now. With 20 goals extra this season we would have got automatic promotion.

Cox scored 29 of our 68 goals, without his goals we would have been relegated with THE lowest goals total in the whole league of just 39 goals.....Cox saved us from relegation almost single handedly.

This season if we havd Cox score 29 goals then we would have scored 85 goals, more than anybody in this division....Cox (or similar) would have got us promoted.

Its really not rocket surgery to see that is it? or am I being Thicky McThick?


If only football was that simple... if you look at total goals scored, for example, you see that Franchise got 71 for 3rd place and had a couple of goalscorers in Aneke and Agard. However Carlisle and Oldham both managed 67, pretty similar to Franchise, Oldham had Lang on 13, they finished below us, and Carlisle had Hope on 14, the same as Kane Hemmings for Notts, they went down.

Your analysis would be better off, looking into the effectiveness of goals scored in terms of points won.... by which I mean, you can get goalscorers whose figures often include good days when they rattle in a few in a game which is already effectively won., so they may get 20, with a number of peripheral goals, whereas someone who scores perhaps 8 may have got those all as winners in close games.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, May 10, 2019, 11:03:22
Tbf, I think Reg is trying to say that having 3 players scoring 10 each is better than 1 scoring 30. So as the chances are low of picking up a prolific striker in L2 Wellens needs to improve Anderson and Woolery’s goal return.

Exactly... it's to be hoped that K and K might have minds focused by being out of contract in 2020.... what might be termed the Billy Paynter effect... get yourself a good year, and so secure a lucrative free up the food chain.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: horlock07 on Friday, May 10, 2019, 11:05:47
So, if I have this right... some people are saying that having a player that will score more goals than others will increase their team's chance of being successful?

Bear with me if I'm being slow, it's a difficult concept to grasp.

Almost as difficult as 12 out of 7?


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Private Fraser on Friday, May 10, 2019, 11:09:50
This is fun! 

So, if I've got it right, some goals scored are superfluous.  If so, what a good thing that 'goal difference' (or, even, 'goals scored') never have any significance.  :)


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Friday, May 10, 2019, 11:12:44
If only football was that simple... if you look at total goals scored, for example, you see that Franchise got 71 for 3rd place and had a couple of goalscorers in Aneke and Agard. However Carlisle and Oldham both managed 67, pretty similar to Franchise, Oldham had Lang on 13, they finished below us, and Carlisle had Hope on 14, the same as Kane Hemmings for Notts, they went down.

Your analysis would be better off, looking into the effectiveness of goals scored in terms of points won.... by which I mean, you can get goalscorers whose figures often include good days when they rattle in a few in a game which is already effectively won., so they may get 20, with a number of peripheral goals, whereas someone who scores perhaps 8 may have got those all as winners in close games.
You seem to be saying that categorically don't need a 20 goals striker no matter what or where we are in the table.

I am saying that our chances of promotions would be massively increased if we have a 20 goals striker.

I think thats pretty simple.

Yes of course we could get promotion without one, but surely having one in the team to supply another 20 goals a season would be a benefit to the rest of the team and our league position.

Is that not clear enough, honestly? I think you are arguing for the sake of an argument.

When even the manager says he wishes we had a striker who could score 20 goals but only you disagree with him saying that would be a bad thing, which is what your arguement comes over as, then I am afraid you are pretty much on your own. That is unless you actively want us to fail and not get promoted? turning every positive into a negative at every turn.

At no point has anybody ever said that we definately won't get promotion without a 20 goal striker, all we have ever said is that promotion would be far easier with one, yet you ar sayign we definately don't need one when even the manager of the actual team says we do.

OK then.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, May 10, 2019, 11:20:59
This is fun! 

So, if I've got it right, some goals scored are superfluous.  If so, what a good thing that 'goal difference' (or, even, 'goals scored') never have any significance.  :)

Consider when Yeovil won 6-0  at Rodney Parade... ideally they might have preferred to use say 4 of the goals in other games and settled for a nice 2-0... if the 4 came in key games... of course it's all speculation but it seems to me that some goals are more important than others.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Friday, May 10, 2019, 11:30:17
Back to the original thread.

Mansfield away following last night just 286 thats utterly appalling for a 167 mile trip.

I bet even Vegan Rovers will get more tonight at Tranmere a trip of 155 miles each way.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: DiV on Friday, May 10, 2019, 11:30:50
Goals win games.

True story.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, May 10, 2019, 11:43:03
You seem to be saying that categorically don't need a 20 goals striker no matter what or where we are in the table.

I am saying that our chances of promotions would be massively increased if we have a 20 goals striker.

I think thats pretty simple.

Yes of course we could get promotion without one, but surely having one in the team to supply another 20 goals a season would be a benefit to the rest of the team and our league position.

Is that not clear enough, honestly? I think you are arguing for the sake of an argument.

When even the manager says he wishes we had a striker who could score 20 goals but only you disagree with him saying that would be a bad thing, which is what your arguement comes over as, then I am afraid you are pretty much on your own. That is unless you actively want us to fail and not get promoted? turning every positive into a negative at every turn.

At no point has anybody ever said that we definately won't get promotion without a 20 goal striker, all we have ever said is that promotion would be far easier with one, yet you ar sayign we definately don't need one when even the manager of the actual team says we do.

OK then.


Always happy to try and clarify the position..... it is obvious that the more you score the more chance you have of winning games, and that having a 20+ man can be a help.  It's also obvious that it isn't a perfect correlation, as shown by say the Franchise/Oldham discrepancy.  Further, there are examples of teams with 20 goal men who don't do well, and examples in our Div like Lincoln, who do well without one.

It's also the case, that they're difficult to find... there were 4 in Div 4. Oxford have had 2 in their history. The manager saying he wants one, is neither here or there, I'm sure every gaffer in Div 4 would say the same. 

So what is the likely reality?  Will Power on the back of Wellens saying he'd like a 20 goal man, sanction going and buying a proven Div 4 scorer?  Don't see it... therefore we have to look at a different strategy, as evidence suggests you can go up by this method.

For example I've used the 06/07 campaign of having front numbers, to rotate and use off the bench, added to a couple of 10 goal men, who for us would ideally be Keshi and Kaiyne.

This strategy of course, anticipates a number of key goals from unusual sources like Joe Romanski's air shot winner v Tranny.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Red Frog on Friday, May 10, 2019, 11:43:15
Remember no-one has more time to argue the toss than Reg, ever.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: RedRag on Friday, May 10, 2019, 11:52:22

Your analysis would be better off, looking into the effectiveness of goals scored in terms of points won.... by which I mean, you can get goalscorers whose figures often include good days when they rattle in a few in a game which is already effectively won., so they may get 20, with a number of peripheral goals, whereas someone who scores perhaps 8 may have got those all as winners in close games.

My impression has been, notwithstanding the penalties factor, that Doughty has scored a number of point winning or saving goals.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Friday, May 10, 2019, 12:03:13
Remember no-one has more time to argue the toss than Reg, ever.
:)


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, May 10, 2019, 12:03:24
My impression has been, notwithstanding the penalties factor, that Doughty has scored a number of point winning or saving goals.

MD scored in 9 different games, and indeed in 7 of those his goals contributed. 4 wins, v Macc, Newport, at CG and Tranny Franchise on the road and 3 draws at FGR,  Oldham and CG v Lincoln.   Only in Lincoln away and Crewe at CG were his goals superfluous in the end.  For te gamnes played a decent yield, will ned the same next but more games played.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Paolo69 on Friday, May 10, 2019, 12:49:15
Controversial but if Doughty would have played every game this year we might have had your elusive 20 goal a season man. :-)


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Friday, May 10, 2019, 12:49:47
Your analysis would be better off, looking into the effectiveness of goals scored in terms of points won.... by which I mean, you can get goalscorers whose figures often include good days when they rattle in a few in a game which is already effectively won., so they may get 20, with a number of peripheral goals, whereas someone who scores perhaps 8 may have got those all as winners in close games.

I just did a quick check on the points that James Norwood has won for Tranmere this season.

5 times he gained them a point with his goals in games finishing as a draw.

8 times he won the game which would have finished as a draw without his goal in that game.

Norwoods goals on his own accounted for 20 of Tranmeres points total which would have meant they finished on 53 points and in 19th place.

With Tyler Walker at  Mansfield -

1 game he scored but Mansfield would have lost and 7 goals he scored the winning goal meaning they would have drawn the game.

So Walkers goals accounted for 17 extra points for Mansfield which means they would have finished on 69 points and in 11th place.

Nicky Maynard at Bury 9 times his goals won matches that would have been a draw and one game they would have lsot without his goals, accounting for 21 points on his own.

So without Maynards goals Bury would have finished on 58 points and in 16th place in the table.

I think that categorically puts an end to your argument once and for all about importance of goals


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: horlock07 on Friday, May 10, 2019, 12:53:22
I think we have reached peak Reg here......


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Nemo on Friday, May 10, 2019, 12:56:59
I think we have reached peak Reg here......

Tbh, the 20 goal a season striker is the logical conclusion of Thatcherite individualism. Reg would probably favour the full team contributing according to their own ability, and ideally a few of them being Eastern European beauties.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Red Frog on Friday, May 10, 2019, 13:06:38
I think we have reached peak Reg here......

 :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Exiled Bob on Friday, May 10, 2019, 14:48:37
For te gamnes played a decent yield, will ned the same next but more games played.
You're becoming increasingly incoherent....


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, May 10, 2019, 14:53:00
I think that categorically puts an end to your argument once and for all about importance of goals

Nobody is arguing about the importance of goals.  Unfortunately your analysis doesn't hold up.... how do you define goals winning games... scoring in a 1-0 is obvoius, scoring the second in a 2-1 similarly, scoring the 4th in a 4-0 less so.

Callum Lang at Oldham who finished below us, has a similar record to Walker.... 7 wins and a draw.  Hallam Hope at Carlisle had 8 wins and a draw, comparable to Michael Doughty, but not sufficient on its own.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: wheretherealredsare on Friday, May 10, 2019, 14:55:06
I think we have reached peak Reg here......

Is that like a Smeltdown or maybe Smeltup?


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, May 10, 2019, 15:23:25
You're becoming increasingly incoherent....

Like Wellens then...


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: RobertT on Friday, May 10, 2019, 15:53:58
Nobody is arguing about the importance of goals.  Unfortunately your analysis doesn't hold up.... how do you define goals winning games... scoring in a 1-0 is obvoius, scoring the second in a 2-1 similarly, scoring the 4th in a 4-0 less so.

Callum Lang at Oldham who finished below us, has a similar record to Walker.... 7 wins and a draw.  Hallam Hope at Carlisle had 8 wins and a draw, comparable to Michael Doughty, but not sufficient on its own.

I thought he said that it was games where they scored the crucial goal, so without their goal it would have been a draw or a defeat.

The logic is basic - the team with most goals wins a game.  The teams at the top won some of their games because they had near 20 a season strikers, and you can pinpoint some games where their goals specifically got those points.    It's illogical to suggest having a goalscorer is not a good thing - that is always set against further context - how many goals can the rest of the team score between them and how do they do in defence.

So for us - you say we don't need one and won't get one.

I say we don't have the players to fill the gap without one and we don;t have a blank cheque to replace everyone.  So assuming we keep what we have, the best option Wellens has is to find a goalscorer., or he is going to have to find four or five players who can get to double figure to supplement what we have, and maintain the defensive qualities at least to where they have been since Jan.  It's probably thougher to do the latter than the former, but both are not easy.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Friday, May 10, 2019, 15:55:34
We wonder why there is a lack of new contributors to the forum?! :hmmm:


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, May 10, 2019, 16:18:50
I thought he said that it was games where they scored the crucial goal, so without their goal it would have been a draw or a defeat.

The logic is basic - the team with most goals wins a game.  The team at the top won some of their games because they had near 20 a season strikers, and you can pinpoint some games where their goals specifically got those points.    It's illogical to suggest having a goalscorer is not a good thing - that is always set against further context - how many goals can the rest of the team score between them and how do they do in defence.

So for us - you say we don't need one and won't get one.

I say we don't have the players to fill the gap without one and we don;t have a blank check to replace everyone.  So assuming we keep what we have, the best option Wellens has is to find a goalscorer., or he is going to have to find four or five players who can get to double figure to supplement what we have, and maintain the defensive qualities at least to where they have been since Jan.  It's probably thougher to do the latter than the former, but both are not easy.

Have you checked?

You're corrrect that the team scoring the most goals wins the game... incorrect in Div 4, the team at the top lacked a 20 goal man....

Nobody has said it isn't a good thing to have players who score goals.... and therefore all round contribution needs to be taken into account as well as defending.

I'm saying Power won't buy one.... why didn't he do it last season having moved on Norris and Mullin? We'd just had a windfall from Flint. Therefore if he won't do the necessary there isn't too much point in thinking you need something you'll not get.

I just think you're wrong to say that it's easier to find a 20+ goal man than say 2 10 goal men.  As mentioned they're rare... 4 in Div 4 this year, consider a club like Oxford 2 in their history. We have 2 players contracted Kaiyne and Keshi, who could possible get up to 10 goals apiece, it's a long shot.... but it's what Wellens should be focusing on.  





Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Friday, May 10, 2019, 16:58:30
Nobody is arguing about the importance of goals.  Unfortunately your analysis doesn't hold up.... how do you define goals winning games... scoring in a 1-0 is obvoius, scoring the second in a 2-1 similarly, scoring the 4th in a 4-0 less so.

Exactly what I wrote in my post.

I counted points won by the team with each player scoring if they were -

a. the sole scorer in a match

b. they scored a single goal in a game that was decided by a single goal e.g. 3-2 win counted as 1 point ganied and not 3, if they scored 2 goals in a single goal win then that goes down as a defeat.

c. scored a goal in a game drawn.

Any game where they scored and their goal was not either a draw or single goal defeat then is discounted.

Have you checked?
And yes I have checked before you question it again.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, May 10, 2019, 17:16:04
Exactly what I wrote in my post.

I counted points won by the team with each player scoring if they were -

a. the sole scorer in a match

b. they scored a single goal in a game that was decided by a single goal e.g. 3-2 win counted as 1 point ganied and not 3, if they scored 2 goals in a single goal win then that goes down as a defeat.

c. scored a goal in a game drawn.

Any game where they scored and their goal was not either a draw or single goal defeat then is discounted.
And yes I have checked before you question it again.

I don't get b. esp the bit in bold.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: RobertT on Friday, May 10, 2019, 17:17:49
Reg, you can't replace a 20 goal player with 2 x 10 goal players.  You lose the other goals the second player would have on top of the 20 goals striker, so you probably need 3 x 10 goal players to replace 1 x 20 goal player if you now need to spread more goals around.  Therefore - one signing vs.3, as we don;t have any 10 goal players.  Williams was a 20 goalplayer - and it doesn't have to be exactly 20, but in that ball park.  On my post I missed the s - the top team(s).


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: RobertT on Friday, May 10, 2019, 17:18:44
I don't get b. esp the bit in bold.

If they won 3-2 and the player scored two, then it would be a 1-2 defeat without them.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Flashheart on Friday, May 10, 2019, 17:26:13
I can't believe we're even having this discussion.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Flashheart on Friday, May 10, 2019, 17:26:31
Oh, wait. Yes I can. It's Reg.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, May 10, 2019, 17:30:52
If they won 3-2 and the player scored two, then it would be a 1-2 defeat without them.

In which case why count goals scored in drawn games? 

In 06/07 we gained auto promotion from Div 4 with 2 10 goal strikers... Peacock and Roberts. In 11/12 we pissed Div 4 with 2 11 goal strikers Connell and Benson. Are you saying it can't be done?


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, May 10, 2019, 18:04:40
Bringing the thread back on topic...

Tranmere to get a healthy win tonight please.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: SuggWillSugg MBE on Friday, May 10, 2019, 19:02:44
Bringing the thread back on topic...

Tranmere to get a healthy win tonight please.

FGR down to 10 after 15 mins.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Panda Paws on Friday, May 10, 2019, 19:11:06
Ollie banks with a screamer.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Private Fraser on Friday, May 10, 2019, 20:43:49
Back to the original thread.

Mansfield away following last night just 286 thats utterly appalling for a 167 mile trip.

I bet even Vegan Rovers will get more tonight at Tranmere a trip of 155 miles each way.

A close run thing, though. FGR took 316.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 04:56:48
2 utter dog shite games - especially last night. If these 4 are ‘the best of the rest’ In L2 God help us.

Am I right in thinking that during the season we didn’t lose to any of those 4?


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 07:52:47
Yeah, W4 D4 v the teams in the play offs.

W2 L8 v the teams from 8th to 12th.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 07:58:57
Yeah, W4 D4 v the teams in the play offs.

W2 L8 v the teams from 8th to 12th.
Then chuck in beating both Bury and taking 4 points off MKD it’s easy to see where we cocked up


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: donkey on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 08:23:53
Then chuck in beating both Bury and taking 4 points off MKD it’s easy to see where we cocked up

Yeah,  no 20 goal a season striker.  :girlgiggle:


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 08:25:16
What an absolutely piss poor game. Deserved sending off, should have been another one too. Tranny should have won by a country mile. I hope Tranmere prevail and get promoted because, 1) Mansfield (enough said about them already) 2) Newport is local 3) FGR even more local. Our well supported team at away fixtures deserve a few less miles on the road. Looking forward to the Salford v Fylde game later today.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Private Fraser on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 08:27:51
Yeah,  no 20 goal a season striker.  :girlgiggle:

(http://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/78/76/e4/7876e42977e592b4a865787eb7dcff02.jpg)


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 09:13:00
I don't get b. esp the bit in bold.
If a game finished 3-2 when they scored 2 goals then it goes down as a 2-1 defeat, not rocket science.

In which case why count goals scored in drawn games? 
Because if they scored a goal in a drawn game then it would have been a loss without it - therefore 1 less point, now you are just being silly and arguing for the sake of it.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 09:56:17
If a game finished 3-2 when they scored 2 goals then it goes down as a 2-1 defeat, not rocket science.
Because if they scored a goal in a drawn game then it would have been a loss without it - therefore 1 less point, now you are just being silly and arguing for the sake of it.

I'm trying to get a method whereby some goals can be rated as more important than others.... so by way of example, lets take last Saturday v Notts.... Theo's first goal takes us into the lead, his second at the end is for 3-1, now you could argue the 3rd has an importance because it removes the possibility of them coming back for 2-2, but to me it seems less important then the second taking us ahead.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 10:06:19
All any striker can do is score when presented with a chance. Are you saying that a player who scores 20 goals a season, but all of them scored when the team is already winning is not worth having?

Opposing teams don’t set their plans around ignoring a striker because all his goals are superfluous.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Red Frog on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 10:10:36
Oh god, is this still rumbling on? It's like turning on the radio to discover they're still talking about Brexit.

I reckon Reg is trying to filibuster this debate out of time.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 10:21:44
All any striker can do is score when presented with a chance. Are you saying that a player who scores 20 goals a season, but all of them scored when the team is already winning is not worth having?

Opposing teams don’t set their plans around ignoring a striker because all his goals are superfluous.

I would want to look at them and wonder if they were to use cricket parlance " a flat track bully ".   Of course in modern football many gaffers don't want a goal hanger, which is why Nicky Ajose never does  much other than at STFC. They want someone who holds it up, can defend set plays effectively, and will get a a few goals. Think France... 2 WC's with centre forwards in Guivarc' and Giroud who never scored a goal.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 10:38:49
Oh god, is this still rumbling on? It's like turning on the radio to discover they're still talking about Brexit.

I reckon Reg is trying to filibuster this debate out of time.

It's probably got to the point, where all we can do is wait and see if Power finds or buys the 2 20 goal men that PV wants or even the 1 that Wellens wants.

Theo has said he'd be up for returning, but has year on contract at Sarfend, so may depend on if they want to cut their losses.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 10:47:14
Extrapolating his time with us he’d be near enough a 20 goal a season man - 7 in 16.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: DiV on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 10:50:52
I would want to look at them and wonder if they were to use cricket parlance " a flat track bully ".   Of course in modern football many gaffers don't want a goal hanger, which is why Nicky Ajose never does  much other than at STFC. They want someone who holds it up, can defend set plays effectively, and will get a a few goals. Think France... 2 WC's with centre forwards in Guivarc' and Giroud who never scored a goal.

Yeah, I mean they had those two strikers but also had Henry & Mbappe respectively


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 10:51:00
Extrapolating his time with us he’d be near enough a 20 goal a season man - 7 in 16.

I wouldn't be adverse to the Theo, Kaiyne, Kashi combo.   However we would need a couple more as back up, as we know they're all a bit inconsistent


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 10:56:49
Yeah, I mean they had those two strikers but also had Henry & Mbappe respectively

But it's how a lot of coaches like to play.... front 3 get the goals, centre forward not necessarily over relied upon.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 11:18:21
Oh god, is this still rumbling on? It's like turning on the radio to discover they're still talking about Brexit.
I have presented the facts which have chosen to be ignored by just one person. My work here is done and my point proved. :)


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 12:08:36
So is it 1 x 20 goal striker we need, 2 x 10, 3 x 7, 4 x 5, 5 x 4...

...or do we just need to get out of this fucking awful division? I think the building blocks for a successful season (up front) would be more confidence in shooting on sight. Most keepers at this level are a bit wobbly (not Wobbly Bob) when faced with a long range shot on target and generally always fumble or gives you possesion back via a corner, etc. Even the self proclaimed "Chile's No.3, remember that" Vigs, is suspect to a lack of confidence when faced with a "rasper". Not quite on RC-C levels but it's pretty basic. Force the keeper into a half decent save at this level and sting his fingertips. He'll be thinking about the next one before it's happened.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 12:08:41
I have presented the facts which have chosen to be ignored by just one person. My work here is done and my point proved. :)

I still hold the opinion that Power won't sanction the 2 20 goal men you crave, however desirable. Further, we could have a decent season without 2 men or one for that matter getting 20 goals.... let's see how it pans out.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 12:19:40
So is it 1 x 20 goal striker we need, 2 x 10, 3 x 7, 4 x 5, 5 x 4...

...or do we just need to get out of this fucking awful division? I think the building blocks for a successful season (up front) would be more confidence in shooting on sight. Most keepers at this level are a bit wobbly (not Wobbly Bob) when faced with a long range shot on target and generally always fumble or gives you possesion back via a corner, etc. Even the self proclaimed "Chile's No.3, remember that" Vigs, is suspect to a lack of confidence when faced with a "rasper". Not quite on RC-C levels but it's pretty basic. Force the keeper into a half decent save at this level and sting his fingertips. He'll be thinking about the next one before it's happened.

Think the building blocks should start at the back.... get your defence as solid as possible, Broadbent and Nelson, could be a runner. A Sol Davis style LB would be handy.  I do wonder if Toumani could get back up to speed with a proper pre season?  Could be handy, but definitely a big question mark.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: ronnie21 on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 12:20:29
I still hold the opinion that Power won't sanction the 2 20 goal men you crave, however desirable. Further, we could have a decent season without 2 men or one for that matter getting 20 goals.... let's see how it pans out.
Theo plus one would do if we could get him on a free and pay for the 20 man.  But this will always depend on how RW wants to set his team out, because it seems to me he only wants to play one up even at home, relying on the speed of Woolery and Anderson to break from midfield.  A strong playmaker in mid-field would set those two running for fun.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: tans on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 13:57:19
Massive attendance at Wembley for the national league playoff final. Not even one side in use.

And we are going to be in the same league as the winner. Let that sink in!


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: normy on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 14:11:54
Nice football by both sides, I'm enjoying this


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: normy on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 14:14:38
Oh mistake at the back and Salford one up


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: normy on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 14:31:41
Bond should have equalised


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: @mwooly63 on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 15:27:00
Salford it is then
 :suicide:



Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 15:27:22
Salford 3-0 up. Third goal had a touch of Craig Maskell about it.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 15:54:17
Salford it is then
 :suicide:



Yep. Shit.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: normy on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 15:59:19
Nice to have a billionaire behind you


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 16:01:07
Yep. Shit.

I’m surprised at you. You must be delighted to be able to rub shoulders with your kind of people at both fixtures. You can share pictures of your whippets, pidgeons, CIU clubs you’ve been to. Union marches attented. Hatred of anyone with a few bob, tattoos of communist hero’s. A day out to wank over. 🤣🤣🤣🤣


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 16:03:42
Nice to have a billionaire behind you

You’d welcome one at the GC. Money does not gaurentee you success. You still have to get the right players and more importantly get them to play well and win. Ask Man City fans how this week has turned out.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: sir windon on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 16:05:37
I’m surprised at you. You must be delighted to be able to rub shoulders with your kind of people at both fixtures. You can share pictures of your whippets, pidgeons, CIU clubs you’ve been to. Union marches attented. Hatred of anyone with a few bob, tattoos of communist hero’s. A day out to wank over. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Not sure Salford City fans would have much reason to hate people with a few bob since those are the very people who have bank rolled their rise to the league?


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 16:16:32
 :doh:


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 16:26:08
Celebrations ruined IMHO by that opportunist twat Beckham swanning around.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 16:36:05
I’m surprised at you. You must be delighted to be able to rub shoulders with your kind of people at both fixtures. You can share pictures of your whippets, pidgeons, CIU clubs you’ve been to. Union marches attented. Hatred of anyone with a few bob, tattoos of communist hero’s. A day out to wank over. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Have a bit of something written by Salford's favourite Communist son....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pupVjQBwASo


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Saxondale on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 17:04:30
Another fairytale rise for sky to jizz over


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Flashheart on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 18:12:50
Celebrations ruined IMHO by that opportunist twat Beckham swanning around.

Doesn't he (part) own it?


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: @mwooly63 on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 18:39:26
Peter Lim owns bulk, I think 90% the ex utd own the rest.
Fronted by a billionaire and backed up by multimillionaires
Fairytale


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Flashheart on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 18:41:17
I know, and I am no fan of it. I just thought it was a bit of an odd jab at Beckham.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: REDBUCK on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 18:43:59
You need to check your
Percentages. Lam owns 40% now


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: @mwooly63 on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 18:52:48
You need to check your
Percentages. Lam owns 40% now

I did say I think 90%
Had seen 60 banded about too.
Either way they aren't skint


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: REDBUCK on Saturday, May 11, 2019, 19:29:10
Indeed and it'll most likely lead to another promotion and then some tasty Man U cast offs


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 00:31:27
Think the building blocks should start at the back....

I said the building blocks for a successful season up front would be to shoot from range/edge of box more.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 00:42:59
I said the building blocks for a successful season up front would be to shoot from range/edge of box more.

Yes, but let's build the front on top of what happens at the back.... get that as a solid foundation firstly and it see where it goes. Notts had Hemmings on 14,  not a bad total for a striker, similar to Akinde's 15 which won the league... yet they went down. Reason...terrible defence


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: StfcRusty on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 07:58:30
Indeed and it'll most likely lead to another promotion and then some tasty Man U cast offs

Pogba and Sanchez in League 2?  :D


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 08:28:28
Doesn't he (part) own it?

He may do, that is not my point. Opportunist tax dodger.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 08:56:00
Yes Beckham owns 10% of it.

The 8,000 attendance is silly for that stadium, they would have been better off having the game at Preston, a nice sized ground much closer to each club cutting down fans travel costs.

The same applies to the L2 and L2 play offs, the venue should be decided as roughly similar distance from both teams in the final and at a ground with a capacity of about 40k as not that many teams in L2 can muster 20k support at Wembley each and very few from L1 either.

If there is a demand such as a Sunderland v Pompey final then yes reassess and maybe play it at Wembley but only if its going to get close to being filled.

Fylde v Salford, 2 teams backed by many many millions in ownership both bought their way up the leagues and both with similar home attendance/backers.

Now Fylde have stayed down then lets make an offer for Rowe.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: mystical_goat on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 09:13:51
Yes, but let's build the front on top of what happens at the back.... get that as a solid foundation firstly and it see where it goes. Notts had Hemmings on 14,  not a bad total for a striker, similar to Akinde's 15 which won the league... yet they went down. Reason...terrible defence

Kane Hemmings scored 14?! I'd think L2 is his ceiling, that's decent for him.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: cdakev on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 09:15:27
Totally agree with you Peter.  I've been saying for ages that the play off final should be played at a neutral venue suitable for both clubs.
It would also be more cost effective for the fans and potentially a bigger crowd and a better atmosphere.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 09:17:32
Totally agree with you Peter.  I've been saying for ages that the play off final should be played at a neutral venue suitable for both clubs.
It would also be more cost effective for the fans and potentially a bigger crowd and a better atmosphere.
Absolutely, makes sense all round to me, obviously not to the FL/FA though!


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 09:38:26
Kane Hemmings scored 14?! I'd think L2 is his ceiling, that's decent for him.

Think you paid a fair bit for him?  Apart from Walker, who's alreday at a higher level club, don't think there's too many Div 4 strikers this season who could play much above...


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 09:42:46
You’re probably right. Stockley hasn’t done much at Preston, Eisa doesn’t get a look in at City. The problem then is if they need to drop down to recover form their wages are too high.

Some players need to decide what is important to them - regular game time or money and not even on the bench.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 09:51:59
You’re probably right. Stockley hasn’t done much at Preston, Eisa doesn’t get a look in at City. The problem then is if they need to drop down to recover form their wages are too high.

Some players need to decide what is important to them - regular game time or money and not even on the bench.
Shitty are said to be possibly offloading both Eisa and Matt Taylor in the Summer according to their fourm if the price is right, neither have done much there and although both are decent lower league scorers neither have progressed to being able to score regularly in the Championship, or even get a regular starting position.

I expect they would want most of their outlay back if they were sold though, £200k for Taylor and £1m for Eisa.

Stockley has scored 1 in 3 this season when he has played (8 starts and 4 sub scoring 4 goals).


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 10:07:17
You’re probably right. Stockley hasn’t done much at Preston, Eisa doesn’t get a look in at City. The problem then is if they need to drop down to recover form their wages are too high.

Some players need to decide what is important to them - regular game time or money and not even on the bench.

There is still the odd Div 4 striker who can cut it higher, James Collins would be an example. Certainly good enough for Div 3, but his mate Danny Hylton has been less effective this year, but I suppose at only 30 would still be able to get a Div 3 club, if he leaves Luton.

A Div 4 club, would have to pay a premium, and I expect Salford not to mess about and sign up the sort of quality needed to piss Div 4.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 10:09:25
There is still the odd Div 4 striker who can cut it higher, James Collins would be an example. Certainly good enough for Div 3, but his mate Danny Hylton has been less effective this year, but I suppose at only 30 would still be able to get a Div 3 club, if he leaves Luton.

A Div 4 club, would have to pay a premium, and I expect Salford not to mess about and sign up the sort of quality needed to piss Div 4.
Hylton has been injured for a lot of the season and still scored 8 in 25 games.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 10:21:40
Hylton has been injured for a lot of the season and still scored 8 in 25 games.

Injuries are a fact of life for a footballer.... although, there are still clubs who'll take a chance on a sicknote, like Oxford with NSSJO.... I'd be surprised if Hylton is getting a regular gig in Div 2 next season. No idea of his contract situation.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 14:38:17
Injuries are a fact of life for a footballer.... although, there are still clubs who'll take a chance on a sicknote, like Oxford with NSSJO.... I'd be surprised if Hylton is getting a regular gig in Div 2 next season. No idea of his contract situation.
Hylton is out of contract and has been offered reduced terms, Oxford are said to be lining up a move for him.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: mystical_goat on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 17:09:54
Hylton is out of contract and has been offered reduced terms, Oxford are said to be lining up a move for him.

First I've heard of it (though I hear very little gossip!). I'd be well up for us re-signing him.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Batch on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 17:31:42
re-sign?


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Costanza on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 17:45:13
re-sign?

Danny (not Jermaine)


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Batch on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 17:54:25
it's ok, didn't spot it was goat saying it


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Bob's Orange on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 17:58:45
Mansfield don’t look a very good side in the play off game. Newport much the better side based on that first half.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Mother Brown on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 18:36:27
Mansfield don’t look a very good side in the play off game. Newport much the better side based on that first half.
Straight from the Pat Nevin school of bollocks.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Bob's Orange on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 18:56:14
Straight from the Pat Nevin school of bollocks.

You disagree?

Much more even second half. Surprised it ended goalless but pretty wayward finishing.

Into extra time.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Processed Beats on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 19:43:10
Hahahahahaha Flitcroft.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: tans on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 19:43:45
Glorious!


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Batch on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 19:44:53
good game with a glorious ending. snigger


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Costanza on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 19:45:03
I've got zero issues with Mansfield but Flitcroft?

Ha.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: swindonmaniac on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 19:45:11
Superb !!.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 19:45:53
A swipe left for Flitcroft


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Bob's Orange on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 19:48:35
Would be humerous if Carolyn Radford sacked him. After all ‘project promotion’ has been a failure.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: mystical_goat on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 19:57:51
Think you paid a fair bit for him?  Apart from Walker, who's alreday at a higher level club, don't think there's too many Div 4 strikers this season who could play much above...

It was an 'undisclosed' one, but initial thoughts were £300k and I think it turned out to have been later confirmed as £250k. The fee we got from Mansfield was also 'undisclosed', but I'd imagine fuck all would have been a fair price for getting him off the books. He scored 15 in 37 for Mansfield in L2 and 13 in 32 for Notts C so is pretty consistent. 6 in 40 for us in L1. He just looked very off the pace for us, like he could have done with losing a stone or so. Like a slightly smaller and slightly more terrible Lukaku. Or maybe that was just his style of play. True point about strikers being able to make the jump.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 19:58:21
Danced out the pub singing let’s all laugh at Flitcroft.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 20:23:57
Stagsnet, meltdown begins 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Batch on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 20:25:48
I was reading that earlier. Sems they reverted to aimless hoofball in the second half of the season. shock.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 21:35:49
I was reading that earlier. Sems they reverted to aimless hoofball in the second half of the season. shock.

Newport should have been out of sight by half time. Up until the penalties Flipflop had had more lives than a cat.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: ferret on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 21:37:09
Newport dominated the bulk of that game - a much better football team, probably because their manager knows his arse from his elbow.

I really enjoyed that shootout. A highlight of a barren season. Hope that horrible wanker gets sacked in the morning. Because, as he’s been quick to point out in the past, nobody has any patience any more  :smugfu:


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: DiV on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 21:53:17
Ahahahahaha lets all laugh at a team who finished 12 points & 9 places ahead of us.
lolololololol


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: BambooToTheFuture on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 22:15:10
Ahahahahaha lets all laugh at a team who finished 12 points & 9 places ahead of us.
lolololololol

Hold your horses DV. I think most aren't laughing at Mansfield. More so at David KnobFlitcroft. The Radford's must realise that they have thrown a fairly large budget at this two seasons on the trot, under the faith of a manager they believed would get them there. Trouble is, I don't think they'll sack him - John Radford is quite a nice (and generous) bloke.

The bottom line is, Flitcroft is a cock and his managerial level is L2. Even then, some will say he is doing robbery for a living. I'm not too fussed about Mansfield but I'm glad Flitcroft has failed - again.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: 4D on Sunday, May 12, 2019, 22:40:57
Ahahahahaha lets all laugh at a team who finished 12 points & 9 places ahead of us.
lolololololol

Why not? There must be something that makes you smile DV?


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Batch on Monday, May 13, 2019, 06:31:35
Quote from: DV Canio
Ahahahahaha lets all laugh at a team who finished 12 points & 9 places ahead of us.
lolololololol

no, let's laugh at their manager. the one who preached loyalty then fucked off.

I'm happy that that prick and his sidekick lurch failed


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Monday, May 13, 2019, 06:50:10
It’s strange, though, that Flitcroft has duplicated his failures at all his clubs in the same way - revert to hoofball, play players out of position etc.

I cannot think of any reason why he hasn’t realised this himself and adjusted accordingly.

Think Radford will give him another season.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Monday, May 13, 2019, 07:03:29
Perhaps he is a man of little intelligence (& little integrity)


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: ferret on Monday, May 13, 2019, 07:13:05
Perhaps he is a man of little intelligence (& little integrity)

Yes and, like many men in that bracket, Sky seem to view him as some kind of hero.

The camera flashed back to him every few minutes, and the commentator kept spouting shit about "Dave". At one point he proudly announced that Flitcroft only sleeps for 4 hours each night because he keeps waking up and making notes about football. As if it were factual, as opposed to some "one million percent" bullshit that he's had flung at him.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Monday, May 13, 2019, 07:33:09
Ahahahahaha lets all laugh at a team who finished 12 points & 9 places ahead of us.
lolololololol

Strange isn't it.... personally I was rather hoping Mansfield went up last day, as it would have meant Franchise not


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Dr Pierre Chang on Monday, May 13, 2019, 07:44:39
Of course you wanted them up Reg, as it would allow you to continue to peddle the line about your old pal Flitters being some kind of lower league managerial genius.

That said, I’m sure you’ll continue with that regardless...


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Monday, May 13, 2019, 07:54:12
Of course you wanted them up Reg, as it would allow you to continue to peddle the line about your old pal Flitters being some kind of lower league managerial genius.

That said, I’m sure you’ll continue with that regardless...

No I wanted Mansfield to pip Franchise last day, because I don't like Franchise.  I've had my say on Flitcroft... but seeing as how you seem to have misinterpreted, I'll repeat... did an OK job here in difficult circumstances.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Bob's Orange on Monday, May 13, 2019, 08:19:05
Newport should have been out of sight by half time. Up until the penalties Flipflop had had more lives than a cat.

Newport dominated the bulk of that game - a much better football team, probably because their manager knows his arse from his elbow.

I really enjoyed that shootout. A highlight of a barren season. Hope that horrible wanker gets sacked in the morning. Because, as he’s been quick to point out in the past, nobody has any patience any more  :smugfu:

Interesting that both of these comments seemed to back up my one about Newport being the better side in that first half that forced "Mother Brown" to comment that I was in some Pat Nevin school of bullshit or something.

Seems he has a bit of a hard on for me, weird character.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Monday, May 13, 2019, 08:34:00
Interesting that both of these comments seemed to back up my one about Newport being the better side in that first half that forced "Mother Brown" to comment that I was in some Pat Nevin school of bullshit or something.

Seems he has a bit of a hard on for me, weird character.

Seems he has a bit of a hard on for me, weird character.
As my late mother used to say, there is someone for everyone, you lucky man 🤣🤣


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Batch on Monday, May 13, 2019, 08:51:43
Quote from: Reg Smeeton
Quote
Ahahahahaha lets all laugh at a team who finished 12 points & 9 places ahead of us.
lolololololol
Strange isn't it.... personally I was rather hoping Mansfield went up last day, as it would have meant Franchise not

yeah. and I was hoping Tranmere would spoil it for both of them. but they didn't.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Monday, May 13, 2019, 08:59:46
Strange isn't it.... personally I was rather hoping Mansfield went up last day, as it would have meant Franchise not

yeah. and I was hoping Tranmere would spoil it for both of them. but they didn't.

Not overly keen on Tranny, despite the HMHB fandom. Similarly not overly keen on Mansfield, due to brick through the window of Rimes' coach in 60's and Thatcher's paramilitaries in the 80's. Just seemed Mansfield had the best shot at preventing the horrible scene of Franchise fans on the pitch at the end of the game...


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Monday, May 13, 2019, 09:01:31
Strange isn't it.... personally I was rather hoping Mansfield went up last day, as it would have meant Franchise not

yeah. and I was hoping Tranmere would spoil it for both of them. but they didn't.
I hope Tranmere put one over on the massive spenders FGR tonight, that will piss on Coopers chips.

Saying that he failed in his last visit to Wembley with us terribly, hopefully Newport will beat them in the final.

In a final between Tranmere and Newport I wouldn't mind either of them winning, if its Tranmere v FGR I would much rather than Tranmere.

And as for Mansfailed I am not laughing at them as a club just the donkey Judas of a manager, also without Walker next season they will be of little threat.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Bob's Orange on Monday, May 13, 2019, 09:41:38
Seems he has a bit of a hard on for me, weird character.
As my late mother used to say, there is someone for everyone, you lucky man 🤣🤣

Not sure the wife will be so keen!


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: horlock07 on Monday, May 13, 2019, 09:43:00
Similarly not overly keen on Mansfield, due to brick through the window of Rimes' coach in 60's and Thatcher's paramilitaries in the 80's.

You have lost me, what has that got to do with MTFC?


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Monday, May 13, 2019, 09:48:17
You have lost me, what has that got to do with MTFC?
The Police in 1986 attacked Swindon fans attending the match at Mansfield, a Police force who were thugs with a metric shit ton of anger pent up inside who normally fought miners on the picket lines who vented their frustrations on Town fans attending the match.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: horlock07 on Monday, May 13, 2019, 10:20:03
The Police in 1986 attacked Swindon fans attending the match at Mansfield, a Police force who were thugs with a metric shit ton of anger pent up inside who normally fought miners on the picket lines who vented their frustrations on Town fans attending the match.

Oh I know about that, not sure how the blame is being laid at the feet of the club though, bar a desperate need to shoehorn Thatcher into every bloody comment.

We all know he secretly fancied her anyway!


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Monday, May 13, 2019, 10:50:16
The Police in 1986 attacked Swindon fans attending the match at Mansfield, a Police force who were thugs with a metric shit ton of anger pent up inside who normally fought miners on the picket lines who vented their frustrations on Town fans attending the match.
I can vouch for that. Absolute bastards that day with their batons flailing.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: RobertT on Monday, May 13, 2019, 11:52:55
The description of Mansfield's wane this season does play into one of the issues I had with Flitcroft, aside from the style of play which was atrocious.  He seems pretty narcissistic - he likes to show his tactical knowledge by making changes, like he did in a couple of games when it went proper sideways under us.  Too "clever" for his own good.  The fact we followed that up with a Manager who seemed completely oblivious to what he wanted was what made this season so damned frustrating.  If he manages them next season, they'll probably still be up there - you don't spunk millions on the club for three straight seasons and then pull the plug without walking away, and the owners seem like they still enjoy it.  So he is likely to get a top three budget again.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: ronnie21 on Monday, May 13, 2019, 13:57:34
Oh I know about that, not sure how the blame is being laid at the feet of the club though, bar a desperate need to shoehorn Thatcher into every bloody comment.

We all know he secretly fancied her anyway!
I think that was Reg!!


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: woolster on Monday, May 13, 2019, 19:09:58
Mark Cooper looks like he's put a bit of weight on, that Stone Island jumper looks very snug


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: mystical_goat on Monday, May 13, 2019, 19:58:18
That Stone Island jumper on a football manager is a strange idea to me.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Batch on Monday, May 13, 2019, 19:59:13
doesn't look like it's his lucky jumper


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: mystical_goat on Monday, May 13, 2019, 20:01:36
The Forest Green captain has only not been booked because he is the captain. Prize bell for having the nerve to shout in the linesman's face whilst wearing some kind of ponytail.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: THE FLASH on Monday, May 13, 2019, 20:47:35
doesn't look like it's his lucky jumper

Not his fault though.

All going to plan with Mansfield and the Village Vegans failing...

Cooper and Flipflop can both fuck off.

Tranmere look strong.....I think they might do it.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: StfcRusty on Monday, May 13, 2019, 20:48:23
The Forest Green captain has only not been booked because he is the captain. Prize bell for having the nerve to shout in the linesman's face whilst wearing some kind of ponytail.

Joseph Mills? Born and bred in Swindon too.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Flashheart on Monday, May 13, 2019, 20:51:08
I'm glad Flitcroft failed. I can't fucking stand the cunt.

I've no hard feelings against Cooper though, although his snipes at people at the club after he left did grate.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: ferret on Monday, May 13, 2019, 20:52:01
Tranmere cruised that, and could easily have stepped up a gear or two.

I hope they win the final.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Costanza on Monday, May 13, 2019, 21:06:41
No issues with Mansfield, glad Flitcroft missed out*
No issues with Cooper, glad Forest Green missed out*

Football, eh.

I'm not obsessing over it, I'll move on shortly.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Batch on Monday, May 13, 2019, 21:39:29
No issues with Mansfield, glad Flitcroft missed out*
No issues with Cooper, glad Forest Green missed out*

Nothing to add, your honour.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Tuesday, May 14, 2019, 08:15:27
It's good that FGR are hanging about.... although arguably now a bigger club,  in league games, :secret: they're not Numb.

Tranny are norvern, so they'd be better off if not in the Conference, Div 3.

They looked handy, mind... big lad in midfield who scored at Prenton, good steady LB, and the CH who headed most balls, 
sort of thing we could do with....oh. 


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Tuesday, May 14, 2019, 08:23:44
Reg is fishing again!


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Ardiles on Tuesday, May 14, 2019, 08:35:44
It's good that FGR are hanging about.... although arguably now a bigger club,  in league games, :secret: they're not Numb.

This reminds me of the cold, wet, miserable Boxing Day afternoon I spent standing behind a clown away at Rushden & Diamonds who kept repeating, endlessly, that R&D were a bigger club than STFC.  They were the future, apparently - properly funded and with a cracking stadium - and would leave us in their wake.  I'm not even sure if they still exist.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: reeves4england on Tuesday, May 14, 2019, 08:48:41
This reminds me of the cold, wet, miserable Boxing Day afternoon I spent standing behind a clown away at Rushden & Diamonds who kept repeating, endlessly, that R&D were a bigger club than STFC.  They were the future, apparently - properly funded and with a cracking stadium - and would leave us in their wake.  I'm not even sure if they still exist.

The club were expelled from the Conference National on 11 June 2011; their unstable financial position meant they could not guarantee to complete all their fixtures in the 2011–12 season,[1] and resulted in their dissolution.

AFC Rushden and Diamonds was then set up as a Phoenix club. This year they finished mid-table in the Evo-stik South Premier Division Central, one step below National Leage North/South.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Tuesday, May 14, 2019, 08:51:29
This reminds me of the cold, wet, miserable Boxing Day afternoon I spent standing behind a clown away at Rushden & Diamonds who kept repeating, endlessly, that R&D were a bigger club than STFC.  They were the future, apparently - properly funded and with a cracking stadium - and would leave us in their wake.  I'm not even sure if they still exist.

They don't. It all went tits up for them about the same time as Power joined their Board...


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: ferret on Tuesday, May 14, 2019, 08:52:43
This reminds me of the cold, wet, miserable Boxing Day afternoon I spent standing behind a clown away at Rushden & Diamonds who kept repeating, endlessly, that R&D were a bigger club than STFC.  They were the future, apparently - properly funded and with a cracking stadium - and would leave us in their wake.  I'm not even sure if they still exist.

I know that they went bust and the ground has been demolished. They might have refounded at park level, but that's about it.

The only thing that really sits in Forest Green's favour is that they've hung around the 4th / 5th tier and gradually crept up the tables over a long period - I think it's 15 years or more now. With RD, it was more a case of crash, bang, wallop.

But nothing is going to change the fact that they play in a village with a 6k population, and struggle to get 3k home fans for a playoff game. And they did not look like an inspiring team last night. This season might represent their peak.



Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, May 14, 2019, 08:58:28
Glad Mandfield failed, glad FGR failed.

Tranmere to win the PO final and rightly so with the leagues leading scorer winning them game son his own. 30 goals says it all.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: swindonmaniac on Wednesday, May 15, 2019, 20:57:28
So Leeds miss out again,   the only thing guaranteed in the play offs this year is red cards !!.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Oaksey Moonraker on Wednesday, May 15, 2019, 21:03:16
Glad Mandfield failed, glad FGR failed.

Tranmere to win the PO final and rightly so with the leagues leading scorer winning them game son his own. 30 goals says it all.

Just need Portsmouth to dish out some play off heartbreak to Our Friends in the North Sunderland.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Thursday, May 16, 2019, 06:54:03
Just need Portsmouth to dish out some play off heartbreak to Our Friends in the North Sunderland.

👍


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: reeves4england on Thursday, May 16, 2019, 08:40:00
So Leeds miss out again,   the only thing guaranteed in the play offs this year is red cards !!.

Bamford booked for diving yet again. That, the debacle against Villa and the whole spygate episode are more than enough to want Leeds to stay down. Not to mention the whole 'WACCOE' thing and the general attitude of the fans. Well in Frank and co.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: horlock07 on Thursday, May 16, 2019, 08:52:23
Bamford booked for diving yet again. That, the debacle against Villa and the whole spygate episode are more than enough to want Leeds to stay down. Not to mention the whole 'WACCOE' thing and the general attitude of the fans. Well in Frank and co.

I have no love of Leeds (although seeing Bielsa in the PL would have been worth it!), however reading social media last night #Lampard was trending at a higher level than either Leeds or Derby so stand by for an absolute wankfest over 'Frank Lampards Derby' if they get promoted, further exacerbated by his mates on the punditry panels.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Bob's Orange on Thursday, May 16, 2019, 09:11:33
The 'Stop Crying your heart out' song that Leeds fans sang towards Derby and Lampard backfired a bit didn't it?


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Abrahammer on Thursday, May 16, 2019, 09:20:25
The 'Stop Crying your heart out' song that Leeds fans sang towards Derby and Lampard backfired a bit didn't it?

Yep

https://twitter.com/dcfcofficial/status/1128789541807112192?s=21


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, May 16, 2019, 09:27:47
I have no love of Leeds (although seeing Bielsa in the PL would have been worth it!), however reading social media last night #Lampard was trending at a higher level than either Leeds or Derby so stand by for an absolute wankfest over 'Frank Lampards Derby' if they get promoted, further exacerbated by his mates on the punditry panels.

The wankfest, will know no bounds what with John Terry lurking in the Villa set up.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: ferret on Thursday, May 16, 2019, 09:45:08
Yep

https://twitter.com/dcfcofficial/status/1128789541807112192?s=21

With Leeds, Mansfield and FGR all out, and Bristol Shitty having missed the cut, nearly all boxes are ticked as far as I'm concerned.

I'd slightly prefer Tranmere to beat Newport, but otherwise am not at all fussed and can enjoy the finals.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Bob's Orange on Thursday, May 16, 2019, 11:12:01
With Leeds, Mansfield and FGR all out, and Bristol Shitty having missed the cut, nearly all boxes are ticked as far as I'm concerned.

I'd slightly prefer Tranmere to beat Newport, but otherwise am not at all fussed and can enjoy the finals.

Yeah as you say not fussed who goes up in League 2.

I have £80 riding on Villa winning the play-offs from a pre-season bet so will be cheering them on in the Championship show-piece.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Thursday, May 16, 2019, 16:36:56
Cheering on Pompey tonight down the pub.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Thursday, May 16, 2019, 16:52:39
A fairly healthy dislike of Sunderland.
Not so much because of 89-90,.although one of their fans advised me after the game that "you were lucky".
Yep, deflected goal aside, very lucky not to score another 4 or 5 on top of that.

No, it was the end of season game in the 90's when their lot were allowed to buy tickets in the home stands.Rikki Hunt brainwave I think.
So I had some guy behind me in the DRS screaming "mickey mouse club" in my ear.
I remember thinking at the time that this is not the way to support your team.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Thursday, May 16, 2019, 17:11:53
A fairly healthy dislike of Sunderland.
Not so much because of 89-90,.although one of their fans advised me after the game that "you were lucky".
Yep, deflected goal aside, very lucky not to score another 4 or 5 on top of that.

No, it was the end of season game in the 90's when their lot were allowed to buy tickets in the home stands.Rikki Hunt brainwave I think.
So I had some guy behind me in the DRS screaming "mickey mouse club" in my ear.
I remember thinking at the time that this is not the way to support your team.

I had a chance of a freebie Checkatrade corporate ticket for the.....yep, Checkatrade cup a few weeks ago. Being the freeloading baby eating Tory that I am I turned it down to pass onto a free loading baby eating Socialist 🤣🤣🤣


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Thursday, May 16, 2019, 18:59:22
I see that piss stain Maguire plays for Sunderland. Fucker got Vigs sent off.

Dreadful lack of quality from both teams. Hoofing it all over the place.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: mystical_goat on Thursday, May 16, 2019, 20:20:34
Brilliant player when he's on your team though.

Portsmouth still not making much but I think they'll get one.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: woolster on Thursday, May 16, 2019, 20:43:25
dreadful game :zzz:


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Thursday, May 16, 2019, 21:36:25
Poor game. I can’t say Pompey were unlucky or deserved to win on that performance.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: 4D on Thursday, May 16, 2019, 22:42:05
I drove to Wembley for the Sunderland play off game, 5 up and they got me to stop at an offie on hanger lane. £5 to park in a hotel car park and my mate upsetting a coach load by calling them geordies.
He knew what he was doing  :)


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Cookie on Friday, May 17, 2019, 19:00:30
The game at The Valley brings back good memories.

Cracking strike from Doncaster to equalise on the night, I fancy them here.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: SuggWillSugg MBE on Friday, May 17, 2019, 20:18:41
The game at The Valley brings back good memories.

Nine years ago today...


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: swindonmaniac on Saturday, May 18, 2019, 06:34:43
Nine years ago today...
Bloody hell, doesn't time fly !.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Saturday, May 18, 2019, 07:25:42

https://t.co/MauHebSgxw


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Saturday, May 25, 2019, 12:14:08
Play off finals are probably best experienced from the comfort of an armchair.

I'm going for Tranmere, Charlton & Villa this weekend.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Saturday, May 25, 2019, 12:19:50
I'm going for Tranmere, Charlton & Villa this weekend.
Tranmere, Sunderland and Derby for me.

Tranmere 2-0 Newport
Norwood x2
Attendance: 23,455

Sunderland 1-0 Charlton
Maja
Attendance: 60,541

Derby 1-1 Aston Villa AET (5-3 pens)
Wilson     Abraham
Attendance: 87,334


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Waffle on Saturday, May 25, 2019, 12:26:39
Tranmere, Sunderland and Derby for me.

Apart from Tranmere, I don’t know why but I think Newport are going to beat them 3-2, I’m with you haha


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Saturday, May 25, 2019, 19:50:47
Well I call that one right. Sunderland next I feel. Then AV.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: pauld on Saturday, May 25, 2019, 20:13:14
Well I call that one right. Sunderland next I feel. Then AV.
Think you're spot on with all those, albeit of the two ties, Sunderland most likely to fuck it up.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Sunday, May 26, 2019, 08:08:14
I was right too and I even called the crowd within just over 1,500, still sticking with my original guesses,  it will never last!


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: pauld on Sunday, May 26, 2019, 08:49:24
Already sick of the pundits talking about the Championship final as a "£130/£170m*  game" "richest game in world football" etc. Yes we know that. But the constant emphasis on it may be one of the reasons why over 3/4 of Football League clubs are in debt and run at a substantial loss (story in the Times the other day)

*(delete as appropriate according to pundit)


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Sunday, May 26, 2019, 15:53:52
Think you're spot on with all those, albeit of the two ties, Sunderland most likely to fuck it up.

And they have.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Sunday, May 26, 2019, 15:54:35
Think you're spot on with all those, albeit of the two ties, Sunderland most likely to fuck it up.

 :nod:

 


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: pauld on Sunday, May 26, 2019, 15:54:58
And they have.
Indeed. They're like a northern us.


Title: Re: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Oaksey Moonraker on Sunday, May 26, 2019, 17:12:21
Think you're spot on with all those, albeit of the two ties, Sunderland most likely to fuck it up.
Do you think Sunderland are beginning to think there is some sort of curse over them in the playoffs?

Wonder what their 1990 manager Denis 'I have always been a lucky man' Smith make of it?

Sent from my HTC U11


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Abrahammer on Sunday, May 26, 2019, 17:50:53
Proper jealous of those Charlton fans, you couldn’t script a better way to clinch promotion.

Fair play Bowyer, didn’t think he had any management credentials in him


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Sunday, May 26, 2019, 18:54:20
After all that wankfest about the mackems 'taking over' Trafalgar Square.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Private Fraser on Sunday, May 26, 2019, 19:51:26
After all that wankfest about the mackems 'taking over' Trafalgar Square.

 :(

https://twitter.com/fbawaydays/status/1132397503184351232?s=21



Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: 4D on Sunday, May 26, 2019, 20:16:56
Stay classy  :)


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Monday, May 27, 2019, 05:32:40
If that had been in the North Sea she would have been harpooned.

Is she actually taking a dump or mooning?


Title: Re: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Combe Up on Monday, May 27, 2019, 08:16:25
Do you think Sunderland are beginning to think there is some sort of curse over them in the playoffs?

Wonder what their 1990 manager Denis 'I have always been a lucky man' Smith make of it?

Sent from my HTC U11

Those from the north-east of England always bottle the big occasions. It's in their blood.


Title: Re: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Legends-Lounge on Monday, May 27, 2019, 09:06:25
Those from the north-east of England always bottle the big occasions. It's in their blood.

Except the players playing for Sunderland yesterday come from all over the shop.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: suttonred on Monday, May 27, 2019, 09:14:57
Stay classy  :)

Sean Morrisons sister I'm guessing.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Monday, May 27, 2019, 12:00:43
Dundee United lost 2-0 (TWO-NIL) on pens to St Mirren in the Championship/SPL Play Off...  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:

I know we did something similar against Barnet a few seasons ago...still hilarious when it's some one else though.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Monday, May 27, 2019, 13:57:55
These opera singers caterwauling the national anthem at Wembley are really beginning to piss me off.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Monday, May 27, 2019, 15:18:35
Derby - the Mansfield of the Championship


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Wobbly Bob on Monday, May 27, 2019, 15:58:30

I'm going for Tranmere, Charlton & Villa this weekend.

On a roll, so it's Swindon Town to win L2 by a 10-15 point margin next season.


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Ginginho on Monday, May 27, 2019, 15:58:56
I've done Villa, Charlton, and for some reason Newport in a treble.

Bastard Newport


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: Peter Venkman on Monday, May 27, 2019, 17:48:21
Bastard Newport
That was the only one I got right!


Title: Re: Play Offs
Post by: mystical_goat on Tuesday, May 28, 2019, 10:08:34
These opera singers caterwauling the national anthem at Wembley are really beginning to piss me off.

Learned a new word. Thanks!