Thetownend.com

25% => The Boardroom => Topic started by: Ells on Saturday, July 30, 2016, 21:01:06



Title: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Ells on Saturday, July 30, 2016, 21:01:06
Curious  :)


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Batch on Saturday, July 30, 2016, 21:02:40
???


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Ells on Saturday, July 30, 2016, 21:07:46
It's been talked about so often I just wondered what it'd look like in numbers!  Especially as it seems to have helped sour people's opinion on Power.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, July 30, 2016, 21:09:31
A mix of one and three. I think it's needless, spiteful and reflects a bit of an unhealthy paranoia, but at the same time it would be a long way down the list of things I'm bothered about at the club. The adver is a bit shit too, but that's not a reason to treat them badly.

Just to sit on the fence a bit more, I'm Sam Morshead and so's my wife.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Batch on Saturday, July 30, 2016, 21:14:20
Oh, it's a poll, they don't show in my app!

It's pathetic, though the Advert haven't helped themselves at times. I guess they figure they can't make things worse.



Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Ells on Saturday, July 30, 2016, 21:23:39
Oh, it's a poll, they don't show in my app!


You'll get there sooner or later Dad  :D

My opinion is split amongst them all I think.

I have a fervent hatred of gossipy, tabloid media and that's obviously true of the Adver. They won't 'sell' (or get clicks) if they just report that everything's rosy. They've got no interest in Swindon Town anymore than a bloke you meet in the street. Except the bloke you meet in the street might be able to spell better. I think this "link with the community" stuff is pretty dead.

But there's also the fact that I think people have already had this opinion that Power is a control freak and this has cemented it - confirmation bias. How can you run a football club WITHOUT being a control freak? It seems kind of normal to me, you have to be arrogant. You HAVE to think your way is the right way.

Also, I am not Sam Morshead. The podgy little clown. I do miss him though.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Berniman on Saturday, July 30, 2016, 23:01:36
He's been busy getting engaged


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Ells on Saturday, July 30, 2016, 23:12:05
He's been busy getting engaged

How long does that take?!


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: suttonred on Sunday, July 31, 2016, 00:39:40
In other news Sony have released the Walkman


Title: Re: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: horlock07 on Sunday, July 31, 2016, 08:00:20
He's been busy getting engaged
And writing stories for MailSport, no doubt our transfer woes are due to immigrant's and will all be solved following Brexit :-)


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: DarloSTFC84 on Sunday, July 31, 2016, 08:01:44
I like to have news, but I like it being spelt correctly.

So I'm torn.


Title: Re:
Post by: horlock07 on Sunday, July 31, 2016, 08:07:21
It was blindly obvious that the Advertiser had no interest in reporting the club way before they fell out, spinning it as a 'ban' has allowed them to achieve their objective whilst also grabbing the moral high ground and ensuring that those who do not like Power latch onto the Adver as some sort of proper media outlet.

They should be thanking Power for all they have gained from it,w whilst simultaneously cutting the cost of sending someone down from Oxford to report it.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Costanza on Sunday, July 31, 2016, 08:59:33
It's obviously a toss-up between the first and third option.

I've never fully relied on the Adver as an out-of-towner but the rumour mill helped the lazy summer days.



Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: RobertT on Sunday, July 31, 2016, 13:31:36
The Adver ceased to exist a few years ago, it's now just an online blog that gets put into print.  The only stories of any merit rely on the Courts (you'll notice they fill a few pages when the Courts give out their summaries of recent cases).  Pretty much every story ends with "xxx was asked for comments but had not responded at the time of going to print" or something like that.  Essentially, someone saw something on FB or Twitter, made a story from it and couldn't be bothered to go digging for any real input.  Their sport coverage is exactly the same - no effort to create any sort of unique content and that wouldn't be any different with or without any bans.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: RedRag on Sunday, July 31, 2016, 15:03:23
Bottom line is that STFC needs bums (paying) on seats and the club appears to be failing (very) badly in it's exploitation of the local print media.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Sunday, July 31, 2016, 15:16:24
Don't think printed media encourages more fans. Success and/or good football will.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Arriba on Sunday, July 31, 2016, 16:59:55
The adver gets shitter by the day. Laughingly awful at times. That said, I think Power has been overly petty with them.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Sam Morshead on Sunday, July 31, 2016, 17:40:30
 :bye:


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Red Frog on Sunday, July 31, 2016, 17:56:50
So that's 5 liars on the TEF then.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Monday, August 1, 2016, 07:28:42
So that's 5 liars on the TEF then.

They aren't banned from reporting on the club, they choose not too. The staff and players are banned from talking to them FOR FREE. That's it.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Tails on Monday, August 1, 2016, 07:40:35
The adver is wank. I'm not just referring to their STFC cover either.

Having said that though, seeing how well Reading's local news cover them does make me a little envious.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Red Frog on Monday, August 1, 2016, 08:07:51
They aren't banned from reporting on the club, they choose not too. The staff and players are banned from talking to them FOR FREE. That's it.

Option 4. Up to 7 now. Shocking.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: horlock07 on Monday, August 1, 2016, 08:47:30
Option 4. Up to 7 now. Shocking.

And 93% seem to think that the ban actually exists......


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Red Frog on Monday, August 1, 2016, 08:55:50
And 93% seem to think that the ban actually exists......

Yes, but meanwhile, option 4.

Oh, forget it.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Monday, August 1, 2016, 11:05:18
Option 4. Up to 7 now. Shocking.

Oops! Sorry


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Batch on Monday, August 1, 2016, 11:49:11
Option 4. Up to 7 now. Shocking.

But to put that into context, 7 people erroneously think they are Sam Morshead. And that's assuming the 8th really was he.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Monday, August 1, 2016, 13:24:19
But to put that into context, 7 people erroneously think they are Sam Morshead. And that's assuming the 8th really was he.

We all used to be Luther Blissett, now it seems we're all Sam Morshead.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Batch on Monday, August 1, 2016, 13:39:57
the Luther Blissett movement, sure was an odd name to pick for it. I bet Luther himself was the most surprised...


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Monday, August 1, 2016, 13:42:12
the Luther Blissett movement, sure was an odd name to pick for it. I bet Luther himself was the most surprised...

Makes more sense than Morshead  :)


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: DarloSTFC84 on Monday, August 1, 2016, 13:49:08
So that's 5 liars on the TEF then.

Just 5?


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Berniman on Monday, August 1, 2016, 14:00:16
I'd rather be Spartacus than Morshead


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Red Frog on Monday, August 1, 2016, 15:05:09
But to put that into context, 7 people erroneously think they are Sam Morshead. And that's assuming the 8th really was he.

That was my point. My only point. But repeatedly.  :headhurts:


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Red Frog on Monday, August 1, 2016, 15:06:24
Just 5?

That's nothing compared to the legion of cretins.  ;)


Title: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Batch on Monday, August 1, 2016, 15:51:07
I can't count. nor see the poll when replying..


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: ChalkyWhiteIsGod on Tuesday, August 2, 2016, 11:32:19
 I'm Sam Morshead and so is my wife.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Ells on Tuesday, August 2, 2016, 11:58:55
I put "ban" in inverted commas for a reason for fucks sake.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: horlock07 on Tuesday, August 2, 2016, 12:23:16
But to put that into context, 7 people erroneously think they are Sam Morshead. And that's assuming the 8th really was he.

With the burger habit has Sam grown and mysteriously broken into 8 separate people, like Sheldon in TBBT?


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Sam Morshead on Tuesday, August 2, 2016, 18:11:48
Does this count as a cult?


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, August 2, 2016, 18:13:47
Does this count as a cult?

Yes, you are a massive cult.

:)


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Sam Morshead on Tuesday, August 2, 2016, 18:15:00
Yes, you are a massive cult.

:)
:clap:


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Berniman on Wednesday, August 3, 2016, 08:08:17
So close :D


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, August 3, 2016, 08:12:08
I'm putting this here as it vaguely includes stuff about club communication....but I got an e-mail from the football league, asking to undertake a survey.....it starts by asking who you support and says they'll pass on the results to the club.  When I put down lots of very poors, for this and that like club communication, community links etc, it asks for some writing to explain.  Anyone else had this?


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: horlock07 on Wednesday, August 3, 2016, 09:27:48
I'm putting this here as it vaguely includes stuff about club communication....but I got an e-mail from the football league, asking to undertake a survey.....it starts by asking who you support and says they'll pass on the results to the club.  When I put down lots of very poors, for this and that like club communication, community links etc, it asks for some writing to explain.  Anyone else had this?

No its just you, the football league have been watching you for some time!


Title: Re:
Post by: Benzel on Wednesday, August 3, 2016, 13:53:56
I stopped reading when Matthew Edwards tried to defend printing Alex Pritchard as Bradley Pritchard.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: theakston2k on Saturday, August 27, 2016, 18:02:47
I see Andrew Steele-Davis is the new press officer, clever move by the club in my opinion as comes with some credibility having been a reporter on Town for other media outlets so would suggest Power isn't quite as bad with the press as some have out.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: wheretherealredsare on Saturday, August 27, 2016, 18:36:59
Don't get too excited ... he's only there to do the ironing.
I see Andrew Steele-Davis is the new press officer, clever move by the club in my opinion as comes with some credibility having been a reporter on Town for other media outlets so would suggest Power isn't quite as bad with the press as some have out.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Batch on Saturday, August 27, 2016, 21:36:47
Power isn't quite as bad with the press as some have out.

Yeah, appointing ASD (good luck to him) makes him/the club less fucking abysmal at PR.

Oh wait, nothing has happened yet.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Ells on Saturday, August 27, 2016, 21:53:20
Why is the club bad at PR though? Yeah, the whole fanzai thing was a bit nauseating (dare I say ominous) but it was shit and didn't work so it's been abandoned.. What's wrong with that? In general I don't feel anything is being held back. What is it everyone is dying to know that Power's keeping from us just because he's told the Adver to do one ?


Title: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Batch on Saturday, August 27, 2016, 22:23:15
total lack of promotion of the club in most forms would be my answer. particularly over the summer until literally the day before the new season.

the adver thing is only a small part of that


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Panda Paws on Sunday, August 28, 2016, 16:14:55
So that's advertising and pr. Not press/media.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Batch on Sunday, August 28, 2016, 16:44:07
So that's advertising and pr. Not press/media.

Yes, that's why I mentioned PR in my post. Right reply, but not the right thread


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Berniman on Sunday, August 28, 2016, 16:49:33
Why is the club bad at PR though? Yeah, the whole fanzai thing was a bit nauseating (dare I say ominous) but it was shit and didn't work so it's been abandoned.. What's wrong with that? In general I don't feel anything is being held back. What is it everyone is dying to know that Power's keeping from us just because he's told the Adver to do one ?

Don't think it's a case of being bad at PR, I think it's just that they are not good at communicating with the fans except for the odd piece from BBC Wilts or a fans phone in once every couple of months.  Power is not hiding anything, I think that's clear, but a little more transparency on progress off the field wouldn't be a bad thing, even if it to say that there are no further developments, the players are back in training, here are some pre-season photos, do you recognize any trialists?  Just something to keep interest moving with a little bit of engagement.

We went from reports at the end of last season that we were going to get our work done early and that 2 were as good as done, we then sign Goddard but hear nothing else until we start to sign some players in the weeks leading up to the first game.  Yes we all knew we were going to sign some players but a little bit more in between wouldn't do any harm.

Those that think that the fans engagement from the club is no different now to when they used to talk to other media outlets outside of BBC Wilts have got a different memory to me.  The off season used to be boring to me back in the day but at least there was something, now I have zero interest in checking up on Swindon town in the off season apart from organising the Player Sponsorship.  That can't be good for our prospects of keeping a future fan base interested in STFC and not losing them to the plastic prem teams, or seeking additional income during those quiet months.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: suttonred on Sunday, August 28, 2016, 17:18:40
It's down to the Internet generation wanting to know the inside and outside of everything. I used to get by with the odd transfer snippet in the sunday papers, telextext, or if feeling flush 50p on a call to teamtalk. In other words you'd hear fuck all for the summer months from the club until it happened, or was very near to via the aforementioned outlets.


Title: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Batch on Sunday, August 28, 2016, 17:21:24
that was then,  this is now. the internet is a tool to use to help market yourself.

something changed after our defeat at Wembley to Preston (IMO)


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Don Rogers Sock on Sunday, August 28, 2016, 19:41:23
Yeah, appointing ASD (good luck to him) makes him/the club less fucking abysmal at PR.

Oh wait, nothing has happened yet.
Out of interest what is it you want to hear Batch


Title: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Batch on Sunday, August 28, 2016, 20:54:16
on the grander scale some sort of indication of 'the long term plan' for the club.

on a more immediate side some sort of greater engagement between the club and the fans. in short anything to create more of a buzz around the place.

better transparency. things like the new training ground should be a good thing. not something of suspicion.

what we get is a half arsed phone in where power gets tetchy over any difficult questions.
 just like to feel the club is making an effort to go somewhere, and involve the fans on the journey.

guess we are stuck with it being what it is. getting used to it now.


it's all about perception of course. we've had this before and still ended up no better off. just think the (perceived) openness of the fitton period was vastly more enjoyable than the closed shop we have now.
--
anyway, the original point was that appointing ASD doesn't somehow make Power done sort of PR genius as claimed.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: johnritsons toupe on Sunday, August 28, 2016, 23:13:56
on the grander scale some sort of indication of 'the long term plan' for the club.

on a more immediate side some sort of greater engagement between the club and the fans. in short anything to create more of a buzz around the place.

better transparency. things like the new training ground should be a good thing. not something of suspicion.

what we get is a half arsed phone in where power gets tetchy over any difficult questions.
 just like to feel the club is making an effort to go somewhere, and involve the fans on the journey.

guess we are stuck with it being what it is. getting used to it now.


it's all about perception of course. we've had this before and still ended up no better off. just think the (perceived) openness of the fitton period was vastly more enjoyable than the closed shop we have now.
--
anyway, the original point was that appointing ASD doesn't somehow make Power done sort of PR genius as claimed.

I agree with the Batch. For example there would be a great buzz about the place at the moment if Power and his directors used the Advertiser and the other rags to promote good news stories such as the good start we've had. Follow up stories all week after the wet weather abadnonment on saturday would be easy)) Manager comments. Groundsman on how hard he works to keep the surface so well but unable to do anything about the volume of rain etc.

You dont have to be a public relations genius to know how it all works. Power doesnt strike me as an idiot but hes kicking himself in the nuts by not engaging with the local media, specially the Advertizer. Its definately cost him money in lost season ticket holders and casual pay on the day fans.

Ultimately history will show his record as whatever he achieves, but in addittion to on field stuff most supporters will remember him for as a touchy so and so who always seemed to have something to conceal, whether thats correct untrue unfounded or not.

 


Title: Re:
Post by: horlock07 on Monday, August 29, 2016, 08:39:46
Nice to see Advertiser journo's engaging on here now, would a pitch forking exclusive really make things so much better.

I note all the comments that Power is some manner of PR recluse but to remind me how many chairman have we had who hold regular phone ins where fans can directly ask questions, how common is this across other clubs?

Not saying our PR is great, but not convinced that a stream of purile stories just filling column space would achieve all its cracked up to do with the apathy of much of our fan base we could be 10 points clear at the top and I am not convinced there would be a buzz, equally nothing stopping the Advertiser finding their own stories to print.

Ultimately suits them down to the ground as they can use the excuse of the club not drip feeding them stories to not spend time and money paying journalists to cover us when they don't want to (remember before all this started their commitment went as far as being unable to identify our own players in match reports).

As for touchy with something to hide I assume this discounts the Diamandis era and the fact that compared to any number of other league chairman he is a friendly open book?


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Friday, September 23, 2016, 20:42:42
And we think we've got it bad

http://www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/2016/news/football-club-bans-daily-after-front-page-plea-for-owners-to-sell-up/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Ells on Friday, September 23, 2016, 22:54:36
I know it's not the point but I can't help thinking one relegation in 9 disastrous years is actually pretty decent.


Title: Re: The Adver "ban"
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Saturday, September 24, 2016, 00:16:52
I know it's not the point but I can't help thinking one relegation in 9 disastrous years is actually pretty decent.

Yep, we've also had only 1 in the last 9 years. But we've beaten Cov already this season so they must be proper shite.