Thetownend.com

25% => The Reg Smeeton Match Day Action/Reaction Forum => Topic started by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Thursday, May 26, 2016, 17:39:27



Title: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Thursday, May 26, 2016, 17:39:27
Got the biscuits excited

http://www.getreading.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/reading-fc-fans-react-pre-11390942


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Ells on Thursday, May 26, 2016, 17:43:27
"Highlight of the season already"

Oh dear


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Tails on Thursday, May 26, 2016, 17:54:41
If we could draw them away in the league cup too that would be handy!


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: suttonred on Thursday, May 26, 2016, 20:18:25
Decent friendly to be fair, cant believe its that long since we played them.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: THE FLASH on Thursday, May 26, 2016, 20:21:07
Holiday...bollocks


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, May 26, 2016, 20:23:04
Decent friendly to be fair, cant believe its that long since we played them.

Yes...5 years now, when 4,500 turned up to welcome PdC to the CG.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: tans on Friday, May 27, 2016, 06:39:18
Yes...5 years now, when 4,500 turned up to welcome PdC to the CG.

Was that when there was some scrapping in the CG car park after the game? Or was that another friendly? Im sure we played them when Simon Cox was a youngun before he came to us


Title: Re:
Post by: FormerlyPlymRed on Friday, May 27, 2016, 06:59:49
Bit tragic they are that excited about a bloody friendly. Would love a competitive game against them, been a long time


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Ardiles on Friday, May 27, 2016, 15:19:02
Reading (A) at Elm Park was one of the first pre-season friendlies I can remember going to.  I think we had just signed Craig Maskell from them.  Lovely sunny evening in Tilehurst in what must have been July 1992.  (This was in the days when we could nick their best players for not a lot of ££.)


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: PetsWinPrizes on Friday, May 27, 2016, 16:31:01
Was that when there was some scrapping in the CG car park after the game? Or was that another friendly? Im sure we played them when Simon Cox was a youngun before he came to us

Could have been the pre season game against them ten years ago? I can't remember any scrapping or Simon Cox but that's because I spent much of the afternoon being stunned by my first glimpse of Fola Onibuje



Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: tans on Friday, May 27, 2016, 16:36:17
Yeah i think it was, fans running across at each other in the car park after the game


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Frigby Daser on Friday, May 27, 2016, 21:56:19
Yeah i think it was, fans running across at each other in the car park after the game

There's a Monty Python sketch in that... Modern day hooliganism...Opposing fans aggressively running towards each other in car parks.


Sent from my iPhone


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Not that Nice If I'm Honest on Saturday, May 28, 2016, 23:17:36
"Highlight of the season already"

Oh dear

Mongs


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Not that Nice If I'm Honest on Saturday, May 28, 2016, 23:23:51
I love the fact that everyone ignores Reading.
We are quite fortunate in that a few teams take us serious enough to dislike us.....Oxford, both Bristols, Gillingham etc.

Nobody hates Reading, nobody probably even loves Reading.

They are sort of Ok............ish


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: suttonred on Saturday, May 28, 2016, 23:55:49
Mongs
Where have all the flowers gone....


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Sunday, May 29, 2016, 20:02:27
Cracking stand at Woking. Be happy with something similar



Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: inept and tiresome on Sunday, May 29, 2016, 21:37:39
Cracking stand at Woking. Be happy with something similar



Are you on another planet? You are in the third division, with a fourth division wage structure and you're talking about another stand.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Monday, May 30, 2016, 00:16:37
I love the fact that everyone ignores Reading.
We are quite fortunate in that a few teams take us serious enough to dislike us.....Oxford, both Bristols, Gillingham etc.

Nobody hates Reading, nobody probably even loves Reading.

They are sort of Ok............ish

Reading's main rivals are Aldershot.....I'm surprised you don't know this.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Monday, May 30, 2016, 06:27:19
Are you on another planet? You are in the third division, with a fourth division wage structure and you're talking about another stand.
Fuck me, just saying it's a nice stand!


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: ronnie21 on Monday, May 30, 2016, 07:23:57
Cracking stand at Woking. Be happy with something similar


STFC were invited to play the first game at Woking when that stand was opened, seem to remember that Woking actually paid for coaches for our supporters to go - I was on one of the two SAS coaches that went!!  We won 1-0 if memory serves me correct - rest of the ground was crap though!


Title: Re: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Benzel on Monday, May 30, 2016, 12:01:31
Cracking stand at Woking. Be happy with something similar
This is a local forum, for local people. We'll have no hopes, aspirations or postivity here.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Ardiles on Monday, May 30, 2016, 17:02:30
We're slacking.  No one has reposted this yet:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rp3toJ9cAQ


Title: Re: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: FormerlyPlymRed on Monday, May 30, 2016, 17:11:31
We're slacking.  No one has reposted this yet:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rp3toJ9cAQ
Hahaha i forgot about that   ;D


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: PetsWinPrizes on Tuesday, May 31, 2016, 08:49:57
The disconnect between the vehemence of the (dreadful) lyrics and the shots of empty stands is quite something.

Realise we can't exactly talk on the crowd front but, to me, Reading are the ultimate modern corporate 'family' club with no history, the Franchise aside -  Having a song which even Liverpool or Man United would probably find a bit too bombastic and self mythologising is the most un Reading thing imaginable.

To be fair, suspect their own fans find it embarrassing too.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Tuesday, May 31, 2016, 09:16:52
The disconnect between the vehemence of the (dreadful) lyrics and the shots of empty stands is quite something.

Realise we can't exactly talk on the crowd front but, to me, Reading are the ultimate modern corporate 'family' club with no history, the Franchise aside -  Having a song which even Liverpool or Man United would probably find a bit too bombastic and self mythologising is the most un Reading thing imaginable.

To be fair, suspect their own fans find it embarrassing too.

I'm no fan of the Biscuitmen, but tbf, they do have a long and decent history, we had our first competitive game against them in the FA Cup in 1892, at the Croft.

It would be 3/4 of a century and 2 world wars, before we played a meaningful fixture v Headington, that's what I call having a short history.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: PetsWinPrizes on Tuesday, May 31, 2016, 09:59:44
'No History' was a lazy shorthand, really was meant to be a dig at the, sizeable in my opinion, element of their support who wouldn't have dreamt of going to Elm Park, yet rocked up when they got a shiny corporate stadium.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: horlock07 on Tuesday, May 31, 2016, 10:13:59
'No History' was a lazy shorthand, really was meant to be a dig at the, sizeable in my opinion, element of their support who wouldn't have dreamt of going to Elm Park, yet rocked up when they got a shiny corporate stadium.

Isn't this the self same type of support that many are basing their hopes on for Swindon and telling Power  he should be seeking to engage via investment?


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Ardiles on Tuesday, May 31, 2016, 10:14:08
Reg is right.  We were playing keenly contested derby games vs Reading decades before the yellow lot appeared.  If you read Dick Mattick's book, there is a lot in there about the Swindon/Reading rivalry during the early 20th century.

Cringe-inducing as that song is, I've tried not to go overboard in criticism of Reading since the late 1990s when they leapfrogged us...for the simple reason that, if we're honest, we'd love to have had a slice of the success they've had since then.  I know others (incl Reg) disagree, but I also think we're capable of emulating the sharp increase in attendances - if only we could manage two or three seasons without threatening to go bust and, perhaps, a promotion.  Maybe not to the same degree (due to the lower population density around Swindon) but it would happen.  We could do with a bit of Reading's 'plastic', in my view.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Tuesday, May 31, 2016, 10:30:02
Reg is right.  We were playing keenly contested derby games vs Reading decades before the yellow lot appeared.  If you read Dick Mattick's book, there is a lot in there about the Swindon/Reading rivalry during the early 20th century.

Cringe-inducing as that song is, I've tried not to go overboard in criticism of Reading since the late 1990s when they leapfrogged us...for the simple reason that, if we're honest, we'd love to have had a slice of the success they've had since then.  I know others (incl Reg) disagree, but I also think we're capable of emulating the sharp increase in attendances - if only we could manage two or three seasons without threatening to go bust and, perhaps, a promotion.  Maybe not to the same degree (due to the lower population density around Swindon) but it would happen.  We could do with a bit of Reading's 'plastic', in my view.

Historically, we were more or less evenly matched with Reading, with maybe STFC just having a slight edge down to the occasional cup exploits, that they never really emulated.

The CG, with the Arkells built in early 70's, just providing us with an edge ground wise on Elm Park.  However it was Elm Park's shitness which poved a winner, as it really was one of those grounds, surrounded by housing and lacking any space for development, that in the post Taylor era, really had to go.

The Madejski, although in a shit location is definitely one of the better new grounds.....would I want one plonked on the CG footprint?  It would be very hard to argue against....


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: horlock07 on Tuesday, May 31, 2016, 10:33:31
Simon Cox is not happy with the direction the club is taking....
http://www.readingchronicle.co.uk/sport/14524400.Striker_voices_concerns_after_Royals_sack_Brian_McDermott/


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: PetsWinPrizes on Tuesday, May 31, 2016, 10:41:11

Cringe-inducing as that song is, I've tried not to go overboard in criticism of Reading since the late   We could do with a bit of Reading's 'plastic', in my view.

Don't disagree with that in terms of the Club progressing, there really is no other way.

Just pointing out the disparity of a song about their 'passionate marching' from Elm Park or whatever it say, and a fanbase that contains quite a high proportion of people who only want to go to football, if the stadium is modern, shiny, conveniently located next to major roads and has a fucking Frankie and Bennies.



Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Tails on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 12:59:18
Reading bringing around 1200ish to this apparently. Probably a few less than we'll bring!


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 13:33:54
Be interesting to see if Obika features at all.

Bound to be A Trialist or 2, surely. Looking forward to it.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Panda Paws on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 13:44:33
Be interesting to see if Obika features at all.


Why would he not?


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 13:47:48
Cos he didn't feature in the last game.

Seems a reasonable comment


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 13:49:21
Be interesting to see if Obika features at all.

Bound to be A Trialist or 2, surely. Looking forward to it.
Hopefully Ronald huth will be one of them, he sounds like what we need at the back, seemed to play well again Marine and did very well for the two games on trial at Bath City vs Rovers and Cheltenham. Bath fans are raving about him (admittedly Bath is a level 3 leagues below ours).

Interestingly ex town Liverpool loanee Jordan Williams played for Bath also.

http://www.bathchronicle.co.uk/bath-city-play-two-international-trialists-in-bristol-rovers-friendly-including-ex-liverpool-fc-man/story-29508493-detail/story.html



Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 13:52:09
Is it usual for a triallist to leave after a trial then come back for another trial in the space of 2 weeks?

Tbf, he did look good against Marine


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 13:56:24
Is it usual for a triallist to leave after a trial then come back for another trial in the space of 2 weeks?

Tbf, he did look good against Marine
Not really but maybe he couldnt get a permit to visit Ireland to play during that week we were away?



Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 14:26:30
Is it usual for a triallist to leave after a trial then come back for another trial in the space of 2 weeks?

Tbf, he did look good against Marine

Seeing as how we signed Balmy last year anything is possible.

Good to see Reading bringing a few, a bit of money for Po the coffers


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Power to people on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 14:34:31
Not really but maybe he couldnt get a permit to visit Ireland to play during that week we were away?



Town didn't take any trialists to Ireland did they ?!


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 14:50:18
Town didn't take any trialists to Ireland did they ?!
No, none at all.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:00:33
Vigouroux, Rossi-Branco, Thompson (C), Sendles-White, Barry, Thomas, Rodgers, Kasim, Brophy, Goddard, Hylton

Subs: Henry, Spalding, Ormonde-Ottewill, Evans, Young, Trialist, Iandolo, Stewart


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:00:55
No Obika again then.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Tails on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:01:24
Worrying that. No mention of injury


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:02:34
Worrying that. No mention of injury
Even if he is injured (which as you say hasn't been mentioned) it leaves us very very weak up front.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Costanza on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:02:40
Worrying that. No mention of injury

In fairness, there's no mention of anything recently.

The silence doesn't help the concern.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:05:13
Hylton and Stewart our only recognized strikers, thats a little concerning to me especially id Obika is off.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: FreddySTFC! on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:06:30
No Tom Smith either


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:12:57
Anyone know if its being covered on BBC Swindon or on Player? (unlikely I know)


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Saxondale on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:15:21
He is here.  Saw him downstairs but he's got a slight niggle.


Sent from my iPhone


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: THE FLASH on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:15:52
Worrying?

That fucking terrifies me...

Threadbare at best.

Buckle up for a shit old season methinks...


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:19:01
Looks like Town striker Jonathan Obika will be sitting this one out again tonight. Have been told he is just being rested, not injured #stfc - adver bloke via twitter


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:30:13
BBC wilts say minor injury. let's hope they've been told accurately then!!


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: newmarket red on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:33:21
 


Im sure powers got a couple of strikers lined up anyway.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:40:59
he better fucking well do!


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: newmarket red on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:42:30
Anyone know what happened to the fullback kinsella from villa .  :hmmm:


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: newmarket red on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:45:03
he better fucking well do!
a couple of centrebacks wouldnt go a miss either.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Trashbat? on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:47:00

Interestingly ex town Liverpool loanee Jordan Williams played for Bath also.

http://www.bathchronicle.co.uk/bath-city-play-two-international-trialists-in-bristol-rovers-friendly-including-ex-liverpool-fc-man/story-29508493-detail/story.html



Different Jordan Williams


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Saxondale on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:47:41
Beeks just told me he is being rested not injured.


Sent from my iPhone


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:48:08
Different Jordan Williams
Is it? my bad.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Private Fraser on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:48:27
Reading fans unimpressed with the team they've put out tonight:

"Starting XI vs Swindon: Jaakkola, Keown, Jules, Dickie, Campi, Kelly, Barrett, Swift, Tanner, Samuel, Mendes.
Subs: Collings, Long, Hyam, Griffin, Stacey, Rinomhota, Evans, Fosu, Rakels.

It's a debut for John Swift, and first fixtures in England for Joseph Mendes and Anssi Jaakkola


It's got to be said... That midfield looks far too lightweight & might get a few tonkings. Looks like all eyes from RFC are on the Wimbledon game with that young line up."


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:55:50
a couple of centrebacks wouldnt go a miss either.
The trialist is Harly Wise, ex QPR centre back aged 20 freed by them in May.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Private Fraser on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 18:58:34
There is commentary on BBC Radio Berkshire, if anyone is interested:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p009jnc9



Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 19:00:18
There is commentary on BBC Radio Berkshire, if anyone is interested:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p009jnc9


Thanks.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 19:01:47
My God Kevin Dillon has such a boring voice.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: EldeneRed on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 19:02:13
Nicky Awhooosie


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 19:03:43
Thanks PF.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 19:09:47
Stop talking about Andre Bikey being a ladies man and Dillon being a twitcher...hes so dull.

Still at least we will hear when there is some action I guess.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: ronnie21 on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 19:16:29
Anyone know if its being covered on BBC Swindon or on Player? (unlikely I know)
On BBC Radio Wiltshire


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: tans on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 19:21:28
My God Kevin Dillon has such a boring voice.

Went to college with his daughter. Fit as fuck.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 19:25:03
On BBC Radio Wiltshire
Not online though is it? cos its not on listen now on the web site.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 19:25:27
Went to college with his daughter. Fit as fuck.
Hope she isnt as boring as the mackem twat.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: tans on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 19:28:33
Not online though is it? cos its not on listen now on the web site.

Nor on tune in radio


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: tans on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 19:28:58
Hope she isnt as boring as the mackem twat.

She was alrIght to be fair, had a cracking pair of tits


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 19:29:07
Nor on tune in radio
Wouldn't know being 85 miles away :D


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 19:30:57
1-0 Goddard.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: newmarket red on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 19:31:29
Goddarddď :pint:


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 19:35:22
Kevin Dillon "Ignore the goal, Reading have been by far the best side so far"

OK lets all ignore the goal, that will work Kevin, maybe that will take off in every game this season.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Ardiles on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 19:53:27
Don't knock it.  The idea has legs.  Goal Ignoring could really take off as a coping strategy if the season turns to ####.  Relegation Denial would then follow on, logically.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Private Fraser on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 19:54:37
Shhh!  Don't tell Reg!


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 19:58:18
Do you think the BBC Berks commentary team have been to Sweden? They should mention it more..


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:04:28
Interesting point about Cooper not being able to work on the defence according to Dillon.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: AldbourneRed on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:06:04
The elusive Stewart getting ready to come on


Sent from my iPhone


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: AldbourneRed on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:07:15
Stewart for Hylton, BOO for Brophy


Sent from my iPhone


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:12:32
Interesting point about Cooper not being able to work on the defence according to Dillon.

?? Missed that. Do you mean incapable, or not allowed to?

Mind you I've long suspected nobody has worked on the defence for a couple of seasons.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:13:44
?? Missed that. Do you mean incapable, or not allowed to?

Mind you I've long suspected nobody has worked on the defence for a couple of seasons.
Dillon said he met with Cooper at a match and said to him why don't you tighten up at the back, Cooper told him he was not allowed to do any defensive coaching only attacking coaching on the orders of Power.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:15:49
That's fucking retarded (if true of course).


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Barry Scott on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:16:30
My god, Dillon's a proper fucking mong.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:18:38
That's fucking retarded (if true of course).
That is certainly what Dillon said, but he is a twat but he has watched Swindon several times last season and does seem to know our players (apart from their names).

My god, Dillon's a proper fucking mong.
: :nod:


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:22:00
Goddard off...Young on.
Kasim off....Iandolo (Yombolo according to their commentator) on

We sound quite good this half.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Private Fraser on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:23:41
Yep.  I can confirm that's what Dillon said about his conversation with Cooper.  I can imagine it was a case of Cooper pulling Dillon's leg, though, and Dillon being so thick that he believed it.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:24:18
1-1


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Private Fraser on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:25:16
We'll probably go on to lose this now.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: THE FLASH on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:30:41
Bloke at work is Reading cunt...sent me pic...a bit sparse.

Reckons it's been poor all round.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:32:19
The Reading commentator says theres about 1,200 reading there and that the Arkells stand is almost full.

Probably going to be about 4,000 there.

They are laying into Vigs distribution tonight, saying hes extremely shakey.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:33:16
1-2.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:33:27
Meh, nothing pre-season, in 30C heat, against a weak Reading team and with a half complete squad. Wasn't going to ever be a classic.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:35:09
Meh, nothing pre-season, in 30C heat, against a weak Reading team and with a half complete squad. Wasn't going to ever be a classic.
Exactly, lots of changes this half too, nothing too worrying IMO.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Private Fraser on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:35:51
Sounds like the same old defensive cock-ups.  It's not as if we've had long to do something about it.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:36:19
Exactly, lots of changes this half too, nothing too worrying IMO.

Having a half complete squad and no real fit strikers.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:37:09
Having a half complete squad and no real fit strikers.
Result wise not squad wise.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: sonicyouth on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:37:46
What's this about him being a twitcher?


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:39:30
What's this about him being a twitcher?
Kevin Dillon used to go twitching when he was younger with some other player at Pompey, but he was telling us this fact while Swindon were attacking as he thought it more important.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:40:23
Result wise not squad wise.
oh, in that case fuck all!


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: sonicyouth on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:42:57
Kevin Dillon used to go twitching when he was younger with some other player at Pompey, but he was telling us this fact while Swindon were attacking as he thought it more important.
Interesting. Did he twitch anything exciting?


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: tans on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:43:21
Good to hear the defence is as solid as ever ;)


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:43:46
oh, in that case fuck all!

If we have the same squad (including Obika or not) for the first game of the season I will be more concerned as it needs more players of good quality.

But for a friendly, it means fuck all its all about togetherness as a team and getting fit.

Last season we only won 1 proper (not behind closed doors) friendly and that was at Petersfield and yet we did ok, you can gauge nothing much really from pre season.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Bob's Orange on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:44:47
I see the triallist for the grand total of 0 minutes to show what he can do.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:45:36
Interesting. Did he twitch anything exciting?
We heard the colour of his underpants, how some players were ladies men, how he would hit the young lad in front of them who was swearing a lot, we heard very little about the game.....I am surprised he didn't go into more twitching detail TBH it was heading that way until he was abruptly stopped by his co commentator saying Swindon had a corner.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Bob's Orange on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:48:09
I'm presuming Obika is injured?


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:48:36
Last season we only won 1 proper (not behind closed doors) friendly and that was at Petersfield and yet we did ok, you can gauge nothing much really from pre season.


And that's why I spent the £10 on some steak and beer from Morrisons instead. Say it every year, the league team friendlies do nothing for me - though I'll take the boys to the Swansea game. Give me a pre-season at some non-league backwater with a few trialists and a few unfit first teamers any day..


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:48:54
I'm presuming Obika is injured?
Rested according to Saxondale earlier who spoke to him.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:49:25
I'm presuming Obika is injured?

Adver/Saxondale (who I'm not sure wasn't trolling): Rested
BBC Wilts: Minor injury (tight hammy)


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:49:43
And that's why I spent the £10 on some steak and beer from Morrisons instead. Say it every year, the league team friendlies do nothing for me - though I'll take the boys to the Swansea game. Give me a pre-season at some non-league backwater with a few trialists and a few unfit first teamers any day..
I agree, an away game at Bideford, Dorchester or Weymouth with 3 or 4 trialists is more appealing to me too.


Title: Re:
Post by: FormerlyPlymRed on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:53:11
Away game at non-league games are so much more appealing than a game against Reading/Swansea etc


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Bob's Orange on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:54:08
Adver/Saxondale (who I'm not sure wasn't trolling): Rested
BBC Wilts: Minor injury (tight hammy)
Rested according to Saxondale earlier who spoke to him.

Thanks both.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: THE FLASH on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:54:36
It's not about the result it's about gelling.

Difficult with fuck all to gel...

Wifh Power in charge we need 4 friendlies in a week before kick off.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: THE FLASH on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 20:55:39
I agree, an away game at Bideford, Dorchester or Weymouth with 3 or 4 trialists is more appealing to me too.

That's the truth....it's all about going on the piss by the seaside and thing football in.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 21:18:44
I quite enjoyed that. Very competitive game, our well documented failings still all too apparent.

Vigs distribution was unbelievably poor.

Conor Thomas has a very poor first touch

Good points. Goddard looks the business, JSW looked good. Ditto Brophy.

Kasim looked very good  in the 2nd half until he went off.

Fucking Reading fans behaving like the game actually meant something. 'One nil and you fucked it up'. Fucked what up?

Should have been 3 up in the 2nd half - 2 one on ones missed.



Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Ells on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 21:20:43
They're still singing about how much they hate Swindon now the sad bastards.
Noticed they've stolen lots of other songs but not the best one. The glory of reading not appealing enough?!

It's half 10 and I'm not gonna get home until at least 1am, your "we all hate Swindon" isn't scary it's just sad. And a smoke bomb? I had to listen to a Dad explain that to his daughter. Cocks.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: pauld on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 21:29:42
My lad had training till 8.30 so we came for the second half. Imagine our surprise when we found that instead of a pre-season friendly we'd inadvertently stumbled into a Champions League qualifier bonus round that propelled the soggybiscuitmen straight into the semi-finals in some sort of Britain's Got Talent golden buzzer style thingummy. No wonder they were excited about their historic victory!

TBF, they probably realise they're in for another shit season and this is as good as it will get for them, so enjoying it while they can!


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Simon Pieman on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 22:01:45
I forgot it was on until I heard all the Reading fans making a din


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Saxondale on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 22:28:29
Adver/Saxondale (who I'm not sure wasn't trolling): Rested
BBC Wilts: Minor injury (tight hammy)

No, the youngest was mascot and Beeks was on the bench whilst we took photos.  I asked if he was injured he said no Im being rested tonight.  Im not sure what from to be honest.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Saxondale on Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 22:32:16
My opinion for what its worth, normal pre season game which the reading contingent took far too seriously.  Usual defensive frailties, nowt up front.

What I will say is for all the shit football we may have to suffer the club does do really well for the youngesters.  We had 3 cousins, 2 girls and 1 boy today and they were made to feel really special. 

Well done to the club but can someone write Phil King some new jokes.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 03:28:32
Williams says Obika was 'showing signs of fatigue'

WTF, after 1 game against Supermarine and 45 mins against Shelbourne?

He's off.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 06:30:25
that's bloody odd to be genuine...

if not off then what - covering something up - long term injury not reported so it didn't look desperate when negotiating with teams/disciplinary/summer pie diet/ summer cider diet ???

hmmm.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: REDBUCK on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 07:26:52
I think the hot weather is getting to some people.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 09:14:57
http://hobnob.royals.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=133093&sid=2f86f8e57b4ed95078deb0920be113e9&start=20

Some interesting comments on there, taking the piss out of their own "yobs" or being the biscuitmen then maybe they were hobyobs? (although knobs would equally work)

Slating Vigs a lot.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: A Gent Orange on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 09:16:31
Power's pre-match bit and William's post match interviews are here -> https://soundcloud.com/bbc-wiltshire-1


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Panda Paws on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 09:24:44
Williams says Obika was 'showing signs of fatigue'

WTF, after 1 game against Supermarine and 45 mins against Shelbourne?

He's off.

Yep, because all he's done in 3 weeks is that.

A slightly tight hamstring is a sign of fatigue. We have one good striker right now. We can take no risks with him ahead of the Cov game.

Yes we might sell him - and maybe we should, given he walks for free next year. No we won't without a replacement. Power has always done pretty well in the market. Why would this be different?

Why can't some things just be accepted, rather than over-scrutinised and narratives created all the time?


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 09:29:17
TBF, they probably realise they're in for another shit season and this is as good as it will get for them, so enjoying it while they can!

Their B team may have another chance of glory in the FLT...strangely I doubt the crowd will be as big


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Red Frog on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 09:31:07
Yep, because all he's done in 3 weeks is that.

A slightly tight hamstring is a sign of fatigue. We have one good striker right now. We can take no risks with him ahead of the Cov game.

Yes we might sell him - and maybe we should, given he walks for free next year. No we won't without a replacement. Power has always done pretty well in the market. Why would this be different?

Why can't some things just be accepted, rather than over-scrutinised and narratives created all the time?

Can someone please pin this on the TEF front page, as well as on the forehead of Batch, Flash and anyone else who goes quivery-lipped every year about the state of our squad more than a month away from deadline day?


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Costanza on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 09:31:57
Their B team may have another chance of glory in the FLT...strangely I doubt the crowd will be as big

I don't know, Reg. Their fans got giddy for a friendly, image a competitive game? We'd have to give them a Town End ala Sunderland.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: 4D on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 09:50:52
http://hobnob.royals.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=133093&sid=2f86f8e57b4ed95078deb0920be113e9&start=20

Some interesting comments on there, taking the piss out of their own "yobs" or being the biscuitmen then maybe they were hobyobs? (although knobs would equally work)

Slating Vigs a lot.

When did reading get yobs?


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Bob's Orange on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 09:51:02
Can someone please pin this on the TEF front page, as well as on the forehead of Batch, Flash and anyone else who goes quivery-lipped every year about the state of our squad more than a month away from deadline day?

Pretty sure Flash is the complete opposite actually.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Tails on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 09:52:03
When did reading get yobs?

I think their after school club showed Green Street a couple of months ago.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Red Frog on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 09:55:03
Pretty sure Flash is the complete opposite actually.

Oh, is he? Apologies for the slur of being compared to Batch then.  ;)


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: 4D on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 09:55:10
Ah, I see.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: 4D on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 09:58:28
I remember when we played Southampton a few years back and a group of them ran across towards the magic roundabout shouting "come on then" etc. They were older than me  ;D they stopped for a breather and nobody batted an eyelid. They just walked off  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 10:07:45
Quote from: Red Frog
Quote
Yep, because all he's done in 3 weeks is that.

A slightly tight hamstring is a sign of fatigue. We have one good striker right now. We can take no risks with him ahead of the Cov game.

Yes we might sell him - and maybe we should, given he walks for free next year. No we won't without a replacement. Power has always done pretty well in the market. Why would this be different?

Why can't some things just be accepted, rather than over-scrutinised and narratives created all the time?
Can someone please pin this on the TEF front page, as well as on the forehead of Batch, Flash and anyone else who goes quivery-lipped every year about the state of our squad more than a month away from deadline day?

I'm not jittery, I'm sick of division 3 and (in my opinion) the ever diminishing prospects of moving up the leagues.

of course we' ll get more players in.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 10:24:35
When did reading get yobs?
Last night apparently, probably the plastic hangers on, with an average age of about 13 according to the Reading radio commentator yesterday, who kept apologising for their language and that if they were his kids he would have belted them round the ear.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Tails on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 10:43:02
A guy at work (Reading fan) is saying the atmosphere yesterday was better than they've had at home for years.

That is really, really depressing.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 10:44:07
Pretty sure Flash is the complete opposite actually.

I think he meant the other Flash, the one that does get into a flap.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 10:51:01
A guy at work (Reading fan) is saying the atmosphere yesterday was better than they've had at home for years.

That is really, really depressing.
It was their cup final though wasn't it.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Bob's Orange on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 10:59:49
Oh, is he? Apologies for the slur of being compared to Batch then.  ;)
I think he meant the other Flash, the one that does get into a flap.

God I'm having a mare lately. Yeah I think you are right RF.

At least I was correct about Flashheart though! Probably the least likely of all the TEF members to get his knickers in a twist over lack of signings!


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Summerof69 on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 11:10:29
A guy at work (Reading fan) is saying the atmosphere yesterday was better than they've had at home for years.

That is really, really depressing.

Some of their fans did say that this game was their 'highlight of the year' when it was announced. Says it all really.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Costanza on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 11:14:47
Imagine pre-money Reading fans being told that they'd be in the second tier and miserable...


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 12:47:34
Some of their fans did say that this game was their 'highlight of the year' when it was announced. Says it all really.

In fairness (Aldershot aside-Reg) they don't really have any local rivalries.  Can we donate Bristol City on a season long loan?


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 12:53:21
In fairness (Aldershot aside-Reg) they don't really have any local rivalries.  Can we donate Bristol City on a season long loan?
I know most of them prefer the Pox as real rivals, Aldershot were back in the 80s when they were often in the same division, Wycombe would be closer but theres no history of rivalry there.

Its nice to know they still remember us.....


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 13:02:36
Here's 6 minutes of highlights

http://www.getreading.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/highlights-watch-reading-fc-fight-11639636


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 13:14:29
Here's 6 minutes of highlights

http://www.getreading.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/highlights-watch-reading-fc-fight-11639636
Thanks for that.

A couple of points from that few minutes....

The camera work is shocking.

Brophy looked like he had a couple of good touches, Kasim looks like he has lost weight, Reading had some woeful finishing, Vigouroux's kicking is awful, we still can't defend a cross and was beaten twice quite easily, we didn't seem like we created mamy chances (that could be wrong as it was Readings highlights though).


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: The Artist Formerly Known as Audrey on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 13:34:16
Tbh, we had 2 great chances apart from the goal. Both were well fashioned by some slick passing outside the box.

I can only remember Vigs making one difficult save - shouldn't have been beaten on his near post and Nathan didn't help by leaving their player with the ball free entry into the box.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 13:54:28
Tbh, we had 2 great chances apart from the goal. Both were well fashioned by some slick passing outside the box.

I can only remember Vigs making one difficult save - shouldn't have been beaten on his near post and Nathan didn't help by leaving their player with the ball free entry into the box.
Kevin Dillon did say we were playing some good football certainly right up till the substitutions which changed the course of the game.

Strengthen the defence and get in a couple of attackers and we could be a good side....of and get Vigs out training on that kicking!


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Not that Nice If I'm Honest on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 19:07:59
From the Reading Site -

"Those 15 year old morons from Y25 were an absolute oxf*rd embarrasment to the club, I can only assume that the school holidays have started early and these idiots were allowed to stay up late.
I went to a nearby pub and they were embarrasing, sat near them in the ground and they were embarrasing, walked out of the ground behind them and they were embarrasing, but it did make me laugh when........

They were giving it large walking back to the station until a nearby pub with lots of Swindon supporters started to empty, the gobby little shits ran faster than Gilksey back to the station"

So I assume that's Manchester Road then ?


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Red Frog on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 20:53:25
I think he meant the other Flash, the one that does get into a flap.

Indeed. Though I can recall flapping you on occasions.  ;)


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Ells on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 21:35:18
They were throwing smoke bombs at the station and getting on the tracks. These things are usually 6 and two 3s but last night it wasn't, there were just too many embarrassing Reading kids.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: THE FLASH on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 22:32:05
I think he meant the other Flash, the one that does get into a flap.

It's me....the one that goes to games (perhaps not as many this season).


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: sonicyouth on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, 22:36:20
It's me....the one that goes to games (perhaps not as many this season).
If you're going to play the loyal fan card it probably won't work so well against someone who lives on the other side of the world.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: suttonred on Thursday, July 21, 2016, 07:35:44
From the Reading Site -

"Those 15 year old morons from Y25 were an absolute oxf*rd embarrasment to the club, I can only assume that the school holidays have started early and these idiots were allowed to stay up late.
I went to a nearby pub and they were embarrasing, sat near them in the ground and they were embarrasing, walked out of the ground behind them and they were embarrasing, but it did make me laugh when........

They were giving it large walking back to the station until a nearby pub with lots of Swindon supporters started to empty, the gobby little shits ran faster than Gilksey back to the station"

So I assume that's Manchester Road then ?

Yeah would have been the Tap more than likely. Always a good choice for away fans to pretend to be hard outside :)


Title: Re: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: Benzel on Thursday, July 21, 2016, 09:15:04
Yep, because all he's done in 3 weeks is that.

A slightly tight hamstring is a sign of fatigue. We have one good striker right now. We can take no risks with him ahead of the Cov game.

Yes we might sell him - and maybe we should, given he walks for free next year. No we won't without a replacement. Power has always done pretty well in the market. Why would this be different?

Why can't some things just be accepted, rather than over-scrutinised and narratives created all the time?
Another like for you, sir.


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: THE FLASH on Thursday, July 21, 2016, 11:39:50
If you're going to play the loyal fan card it probably won't work so well against someone who lives on the other side of the world.

No excuse....They are plenty of Planes...


Title: Re: Reading 'friendly'
Post by: wheretherealredsare on Thursday, July 21, 2016, 12:36:57
No excuse....They are plenty of Planes...

I bet I've been to more games than he has in the last 10 years ...

... and I've got a replica shirt!

COYR (not you domestic party members)