Thetownend.com

25% => The Boardroom => Topic started by: Dr Pierre Chang on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 07:03:57



Title: 'Chang - not funny' - Adver
Post by: Dr Pierre Chang on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 07:03:57
Quote
SWINDON Town Football Club is due in court next month for failing to pay rent on the County Ground and faces the possibility of being evicted.

The club owes more than £50,000 to the council, which owns the ground, and that is for money owed over several months.

It is understood there is a clause in the rent agreement which says if the bill is not paid for several months then the money will be pursued through the courts.

If the court finds in favour of the council they have the right to take control of the ground, although it is hoped a solution can be found before that.

The news of the court action comes days after it was announced the amount of Government funding the council will receive next year is due to be significantly less than first thought, meaning an extra £1m in savings will need to be found.

Council chiefs are also keen not to allow the debt to mount to unmanageable levels as it has under previous owners.

A court date has been set for January 5, although if the club, owned by Lee Power, pays the bill this may be cancelled.

A council spokesman said: “The council are pursuing the usual legal action when rent is not paid and payment has not been agreed.

“In this instance the club owes us over £50,000 and it has not indicated when this will be paid.

“None of the individuals and businesses who pay their rent to the council on time would expect us to make an exception, particularly when we are facing serious financial challenges in providing essential services and still have a budget gap for this year of £2m.

“If the court finds in the council’s favour we will have the right to take possession of the ground within 28 days, but we would hope to resolve things with the club before it gets to that stage.

“The council agreed it would not allow whoever owned the club to rack up huge debts, because in the past this led to it having to write-off large sums of money in order for the club to survive. We can’t afford to do that again.”

While the club has enjoyed success on the field and are third in League One, this is not the first time this season Swindon Town has been accused of not paying money owed to the public purse.

In August it was revealed the club owed the police almost £30,000 for unpaid police bills, which has since been resolved.

Swindon Town were contacted for comment but no one was available.

I really am enjoying this season, but can't be the only one fearing a new year capitulation, ala the 12/13 season?


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: tans on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 07:29:42
Oh ffs.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 07:33:17
They will pay the bill and that will be that.

Non story.


Title: Re:
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 07:33:56
Ffs. The most worrying aspect is that I thought Power was on top of things.

He could of course not be paying  in protest at something, but that would be stupid..


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 07:39:10
Now we know what the Aussie sponsorship is for.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: DarloSTFC84 on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 07:48:30
There's always Sixfields..


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Frigby Daser on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 07:58:40
Hardly a way of getting the Council onside and goes to show (as if we didn't know it anyway) that we are still very much working on a 'hand to mouth' basis.

The only difference is that the transfer strategy gives us an income flow that we didn't have before, so long as we sell regularly.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 08:09:17
The transfer window reopens in a week, I can't see who it would benefit to go public now?


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Costanza on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 08:13:12
Because we operate like clockwork?


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 08:14:17
Because we operate like clockwork.

Even a stopped clock pays up twice a year.

No wait, that's not it.



Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: kerry red on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 08:39:30
Struggling to understand this.

Power says he has budgeted for crowds of 7500 - which we have spot on - and I presume paying your rent would be included in this.

Anyone else preparing to hear it's the (non going) fans' fault we have to sell in January?


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: pauld on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 08:44:47
It's annoying and embarrassing but let's get a sense of perspective here, this is 2-3 months' arrears we're talking about here but the council (quite reasonably) keep us on a short leash these days so we can't rack up the six-figure debts of the past. If it doesn't get cleared fairly quickly, that might be more reason for concern.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Sir Pissalot on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 08:55:40
... so it's just the Adver 'shit-stirring' again, then, is it? 



Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: manc_red on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 08:57:22
... so it's just the Adver 'shit-stirring' again, then, is it? 

Not really. Right to report it IMO.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: DarloSTFC84 on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 09:03:12
... so it's just the Adver 'shit-stirring' again, then, is it? 



Was everything spelt correctly in the article too?


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Tails on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 09:06:07
Tenant doesnt pay rent, landlord threatens action to force hand.

Bit meh about it although I hope we get an explanation as to why it hasn't been paid. I imagine it'll be sorted before long.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: ron dodgers on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 09:09:50
I don't pay bills until I have to


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: 4D on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 09:18:59
Surely setting up a direct debit is the answer?


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: pauld on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 09:31:01
... so it's just the Adver 'shit-stirring' again, then, is it? 
No, quite reasonable to report it. Just cautioning for a proportionate response.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 09:40:09
The transfer window reopens in a week, I can't see who it would benefit to go public now?

Exactly....I'll be amazed if we get through January intact.

We have a Sky fixture in early Jan, my mind wanders back to 4 years ago when we had a Sky fixture in Jan at the Valley, and stuffed the Addicks 4-2.   Austin 2, Ritchie, Morrison....recent or potential value in the transfer market roughly 22mill. We got about 2 mill...

The sale of 2 of those, meant relegation.

Saturday's crowd in relation to elsewhere was pretty dismal, even fewer than Dongs, and Power has warned us...


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Flashheart on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 09:42:32
soapy tit wank


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Abrahammer on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 09:48:13
Haha Christmas has come early for Reg


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Bob's Orange on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 09:48:57
In other news my computer when I logged on this morning told me I had 8 days to change my password. I won't be changing it now, as i'll do it in 8 days when it expires.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Paolo69 on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 09:49:36
And the old Reg is back! Haha


Title: Re:
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 10:06:01
It's slightly concerning that we may have cash flow problems though.

Could be an oversight/negotiating tactic, I'm sure it won't go to court, but to my mind pissing off the council isn't best prep for lease/redevelopment negotiations. Mind you this is SBC, they'll probably just see the £££ signs when that day comes


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Tails on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 10:08:18
fuck I didnt realise we won a game on telly a few years ago.

game over, we're doomed.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: DarloSTFC84 on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 10:09:00
Exactly....I'll be amazed if we get through January intact.

We have a Sky fixture in early Jan, my mind wanders back to 4 years ago when we had a Sky fixture in Jan at the Valley, and stuffed the Addicks 4-2.   Austin 2, Ritchie, Morrison....recent or potential value in the transfer market roughly 22mill. We got about 2 mill...

The sale of 2 of those, meant relegation.

Saturday's crowd in relation to elsewhere was pretty dismal, even fewer than Dongs, and Power has warned us...

 :crash: :suicide: :whoosh: :diespam:


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: REDBUCK on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 10:26:19
It didn't take long for us to headline on the City site again.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: FormerlyPlymRed on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 10:27:46


Saturday's crowd in relation to elsewhere was pretty dismal, even fewer than Dongs, and Power has warned us...
Franchise have averaged more than us for a few seasons now (they do tend to get higher away followings however)


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Flashheart on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 11:08:23
Quote
We have met up with the Council with respect to a discussion on the rental arrears and have set out our position. In short, the club has expended material costs on repairs and maintenance of The County Ground to ensure that that it is in a fit condition so that we can host matches.
Read more at http://www.swindontownfc.co.uk/news/article/club-statement-2160809.aspx#OOWYc8xi8Lx5mo7b.99

I thought we owned the stadium but not the ground it's on. Would that not mean that we would be responsible for repairs and what not?

I don't really know to be honest.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: tans on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 11:09:40
I thought we just rented it all?

Who knows


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Flashheart on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 11:14:10
Renting a stadium is like renting a house?


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 11:27:25
Read more at http://www.swindontownfc.co.uk/news/article/club-statement-2160809.aspx#OOWYc8xi8Lx5mo7b.99

I thought we owned the stadium but not the ground it's on. Would that not mean that we would be responsible for repairs and what not?

I don't really know to be honest.

Yes.  We are also responsible for things like the approach road, alongside the CGH to the back of the Arkells.

Although the Council own the ground it's on....interestingly not the ground under the CG.  Just like home owners don't own the ground under their houses.  The Tories recently passed legislation, making it OK for fracking companies to bore under your house without permission, and fill in te subsequent hole with any old shit.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: suttonred on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 11:31:51
Sounds to me like power has read the agreement and found things that he has paid for the council should be paying to me, reading between the lines.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 11:31:58
http://www.thisisswindontownfc.co.uk/news/11684394.STFC__keen_to_reach_compromise__with_Swindon_Council_over_rent_arrears/


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Gnasher on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 11:32:01
Read more at http://www.swindontownfc.co.uk/news/article/club-statement-2160809.aspx#OOWYc8xi8Lx5mo7b.99

I thought we owned the stadium but not the ground it's on. Would that not mean that we would be responsible for repairs and what not?

I don't really know to be honest.

That was my understanding too. We own the buildings, they own the land.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 11:32:20
Quote
SWINDON Town Football Club has issued a statement after the Adver revealed it is due in court next month for failing to pay rent on the County Ground and faces the possibility of being evicted.

The club owes more than £50,000 to the council, which owns the ground, and that is for money owed over several months. It is understood there is a clause in the rent agreement which says if the bill is not paid for several months then the money will be pursued through the courts.

Today the club issued the statement: "We have met up with the Council with respect to a discussion on the rental arrears and have set out our position.

"In short, the club has expended material costs on repairs and maintenance of The County Ground to ensure that that it is in a fit condition so that we can host matches.

"We are keen to come to some understanding with the Council on these arrears in light of these significant costs and are currently in active dialogue with them to agree on a pragmatic way forward given that, at heart, both parties have a mutuality of interest in ensuring a compromise is reached."


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: 4D on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 11:39:15
It didn't take long for us to headline on the City site again.

It's a good job the wurzels are so well informed, if it wasn't for their inside knowledge then I really wouldn't know what to believe.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Bob's Orange on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 11:40:34
Sounds fair enough to me. Using the analogy of a landlord and tenant, if the tenant has to make some repairs, its only fair that the landlord makes the payments, whether it be in an amendment in rent or whatever.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Samdy Gray on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 11:50:53
SBC must've known about these discussions. Sounds like someone went whining to the Adver to try and force the club's hand.

I'm sure the club aren't completely innocent in all of this, but it's a poor show from SBC really for trying to play this out in public.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Power to people on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 11:54:30
I vaguely remember from the Wray days also that there was some other payment for something other than rent that was being withheld, I suspect the contract has never been reviewed since it was agreed x many years ago, I think it was something to do with we paid the council x percentage of gate receipts also (or something simular).


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: sonicyouth on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 12:00:53
In the words of OST, do I have to do anything?


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Not that Nice If I'm Honest on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 13:07:50
Yes.  We are also responsible for things like the approach road, alongside the CGH to the back of the Arkells.

Although the Council own the ground it's on....interestingly not the ground under the CG.  Just like home owners don't own the ground under their houses.  The Tories recently passed legislation, making it OK for fracking companies to bore under your house without permission, and fill in te subsequent hole with any old shit.

You're on form Reg, even managing to ravage the Tories on a thread about unpaid rent


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Outletred on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 13:19:02
Seriously what has unpaid rent got to do with the Tories?


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Flashheart on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 13:26:18
Seriously what has unpaid rent got to do with the Tories?

I don't know, but we're probably going down.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: dalumpimunki on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 13:38:19
I think we own the DR as it wasn't built when we sold the ground to the BC, and the club paid for it to be constructed from the monies we made from our one season in the PL and selling the likes of Summerbee and Moncur following relegation. I'm sure it's been listed as an asset on balance sheets in the past. Not sure about the rest of the ground, but regardless I'm sure the lease would have been on a full repair basis.

However, all that is pretty irrelevant as we all know that currently there is no lease. That ran out a year or more ago, and we've been working on a bit of an ad hoc basis month by month ever since. Presumably the club have been trying to initiate discussions on the issue of the state of the ground and agreeing a new lease and have been deliberately withholding rental payments to "incentivise the prioritisation" of such discussions.

I'm not remotely concerned we're in any danger of being evicted or even getting to court. This is not a cash flow issue. Like the policing bill business this is simply part of a commercial negotiation.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 14:24:52
I think we own the DR as it wasn't built when we sold the ground to the BC, and the club paid for it to be constructed from the monies we made from our one season in the PL and selling the likes of Summerbee and Moncur following relegation. I'm sure it's been listed as an asset on balance sheets in the past. Not sure about the rest of the ground, but regardless I'm sure the lease would have been on a full repair basis.

However, all that is pretty irrelevant as we all know that currently there is no lease. That ran out a year or more ago, and we've been working on a bit of an ad hoc basis month by month ever since. Presumably the club have been trying to initiate discussions on the issue of the state of the ground and agreeing a new lease and have been deliberately withholding rental payments to "incentivise the prioritisation" of such discussions.

I'm not remotely concerned we're in any danger of being evicted or even getting to court. This is not a cash flow issue. Like the policing bill business this is simply part of a commercial negotiation.

No idea what you're on about here.

The second bit has some merit though.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Samdy Gray on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 14:58:12
However, all that is pretty irrelevant as we all know that currently there is no lease. That ran out a year or more ago, and we've been working on a bit of an ad hoc basis month by month ever since. Presumably the club have been trying to initiate discussions on the issue of the state of the ground and agreeing a new lease and have been deliberately withholding rental payments to "incentivise the prioritisation" of such discussions.

I'm not remotely concerned we're in any danger of being evicted or even getting to court. This is not a cash flow issue. Like the policing bill business this is simply part of a commercial negotiation.

I hate it when I agree with you.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: manc_red on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 15:20:40
 Just like home owners don't own the ground under their houses.

They do. The basic principle of freehold ownership is that you own "everything from the heavens to the centre of the earth", which includes any minerals under the land and mining rights etc (vaguely recall there being a Latin maxim but fucked if I can remember it). There may be statutes that give others or the crown certain *rights* over parts of the land for specific purposes, but that doesn't change the fact of *ownership*.

No idea what the position would be regards the CG though. Suspect its more complicated than that.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: RobertT on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 15:32:59
No idea what you're on about here.

The second bit has some merit though.

My understanding from previous accounts that were published is that the DR stand is an asset of the club as it is one of the few things debts have been secured against (the lease and the lawnmower being others!).  It was a modular design to allow it to be easily dismantled if ever needed or changed in future developments.  The other stands never appear in the accounts from memory which would suggest non ownership and entirely part of the leasehold.

The rent is a % of turnover deal, so if we do well the council benefits, but if we get less revenue we pay less rent.

Seems like reasonable negotiations.

Think the Council are keen to deflect a series of recent poor publicity for themselves and prepare the way for the cuts they will be putting in place with various central government grants drying up.  Some stats on Council Tax "Dodgers" will no doubt surface in the New Year.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Flashheart on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 15:57:50
Quote
BBC Wiltshire Sport ‏@BBCWiltsSport  36s37 seconds ago
FOOTBALL: In response to @Official_STFC's earlier statement http://tinyurl.com/prca8g4  SBC says #stfc is responsible for maintenance of the CG


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: kerry red on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 16:01:47
If that is the case then the club must own the entire infrastructure of the CG.

If the council, as landlord, owned it they would be responsible for its upkeep


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Flashheart on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 16:10:30
As you were. Just wanted to nip another political thread hijacking in the bud.  :)


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Levi lapper on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 16:33:31
Yeah because councils are nothing to do with politics right


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Flashheart on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 16:36:40
Umm, not in this case. No.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 16:44:05
Yeah because councils are nothing to do with politics right

The point I was trying to make is that ownership when it involves political expediency, may not be what people assume to be the case...however this place is now more Don Heath than Don Rogers, so censorship is to be expected.


Title: Re: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: horlock07 on Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 19:22:36
If that is the case then the club must own the entire infrastructure of the CG.

If the council, as landlord, owned it they would be responsible for its upkeep


My understanding from previous accounts that were published is that the DR stand is an asset of the club as it is one of the few things debts have been secured against (the lease and the lawnmower being others!).  It was a modular design to allow it to be easily dismantled if ever needed or changed in future developments.  The other stands never appear in the accounts from memory which would suggest non ownership and entirely part of the leasehold.


I would assume the DRS appears in the accounts as it has a theoretical value, however I cannot see it being worth anything as whilst it may be modular i just cannot see it ever being worth the cost of stripping it down to move. Equally I would assume that the other stands have depreciated to zero for accounting purposes anyway.

If the rent is based in attendances i can see much opportunity for argument, I  assume there is a formula that allows the club to deduct maintenance from the attendance income but how? The club say repair 'x' cost so much and must be deducted but council say prove it etc?

Equally it's potentially the case that the maintenance was in a grey area, a favourite being utilities is that maintenance or is it not? Who is responsible? Great fun for surveyors....

Sure will be sorted just some pre Christmas willy waving by the council, possibly to bury some bad news re wider budgets.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: JayBox325 on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 02:54:36
I don't really know what to make of this. What has anyone got to gain from publicising any of this crap?

At least it's given our friends over on OTIB another reason to bust out the 'Swindle' word again. We all know how much they love that.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Levi lapper on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 05:49:18
 
Umm, not in this case. No.
:hmmm:


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Levi lapper on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 05:56:16
The point I was trying to make is that ownership when it involves political expediency, may not be what people assume to be the case...however this place is now more Don Heath than Don Rogers, so censorship is to be expected.

Totally agree. Censorship, on a football discussion forum. Scary stuff.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 06:01:50
Oh grow up for fuck's sake, it was only moved to another thread.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Power to people on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 10:43:09
I don't really know what to make of this. What has anyone got to gain from publicising any of this crap?

At least it's given our friends over on OTIB another reason to bust out the 'Swindle' word again. We all know how much they love that.

By the sounds of it the council leaked this to the adver, and it is coming up to that time of year again when they start rumblings on council tax freezing or going up and how they have no money, will have to cut x, y & z service to manage so this is probably a nice distraction they can say we are short of money as STFC owe us 50k, but we are being good and trying to recover this.

Odd if they are in discussions that they should claim they are going to court, surely you discuss until you reach an impasse and then use a neuteral body to mediate this type of claim.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 11:30:49
I'm gonna read between the lines again, I think this is something to do with the trip to Australia, I suspect there is an angle here we cant yet see, possibly manoeuvring to buy the ground back maybe.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 11:59:35
I'm gonna read between the lines again, I think this is something to do with the trip to Australia, I suspect there is an angle here we cant yet see, possibly manoeuvring to buy the ground back maybe.

The club have never owned the ground....


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Matt71 on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 13:19:40
According to the BBC the club pay the council 17k a month rent plus all up keep costs which is 200k plus per year.Power is basically saying it is too much to pay for a staduim that is delapidated and costs will only go up.He is looking for a better deal for the club and in my opinion the council should be wary ,if we move out they will loose all the rental income plus they will be responsible for the upkeep.Ontop of this the land can only be used for sporting activity which was stipulated by the Goddard estate when it donated the land to the town of Swindon so worthless for development.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 14:14:31
The council have a duty to realise the revenue though. Its unfair on local taxpayers to do otherwise.

I'm pretty sure they could get round that covenant too.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Levi lapper on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 14:26:08
By the sounds of it the council leaked this to the adver, and it is coming up to that time of year again when they start rumblings on council tax freezing or going up and how they have no money, will have to cut x, y & z service to manage so this is probably a nice distraction they can say we are short of money as STFC owe us 50k, but we are being good and trying to recover this.

Odd if they are in discussions that they should claim they are going to court, surely you discuss until you reach an impasse and then use a neuteral body to mediate this type of claim.

Given that Local Authorities will have lost 45% of their Central Government funding between 2007 - 2017 it's not surprising that  they're going after the money. It would be a good time to try and buy the ground, not sure it would be good for the club in the long term though.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: chalkies_shorts on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 14:37:43
Ontop of this the land can only be used for sporting activity which was stipulated by the Goddard estate when it donated the land to the town of Swindon so worthless for development.
That is easily bought out and I think people have alluded to the wording being leisure activities which would include shopping depending on how broad you take the definition to be.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 15:02:46
According to the BBC the club pay the council 17k a month rent plus all up keep costs which is 200k plus per year.Power is basically saying it is too much to pay for a staduim that is delapidated and costs will only go up.He is looking for a better deal for the club and in my opinion the council should be wary ,if we move out they will loose all the rental income plus they will be responsible for the upkeep.Ontop of this the land can only be used for sporting activity which was stipulated by the Goddard estate when it donated the land to the town of Swindon so worthless for development.

 The club, might look at a ground share with Supermarine as a possibilty, if moving out is on the cards....maybe the DRS could be recycled, existing capacity at Hunt's Copse  is 3K DRS must be near on 3K, so enough of a capacity in the short term, whilst a bit more development is carried out.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: @mwooly63 on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 16:14:21
The club, might look at a ground share with Supermarine as a possibilty, if moving out is on the cards....maybe the DRS could be recycled, existing capacity at Hunt's Copse  is 3K DRS must be near on 3K, so enough of a capacity in the short term, whilst a bit more development is carried out.

Pretty sure its 4600


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 16:21:18
Pretty sure its 4600

Even better....4600+ 3000 at Hunt's Copse = 7,600.... about the amount on Saturday.  So could possibly be done ready for 15/16, if the club serve notice on SBC


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 16:21:43
Oh fuck off Reg.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: sonicyouth on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 16:24:42
Oh fuck off Reg.
Christmas is great in the Smeeton household


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 16:27:53
Christmas is great in the Smeeton household

Of course....there's freedom of speech.



Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Arriba on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 16:29:43
Thanks for giving me a laugh Reg. Enjoyable read. :clap:


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: kerry red on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 16:42:36
There's some playing fields at the back of Rodbourne.

A couple of jumpers for goalposts and we'd be set.

Go on, Lee, tell the council to fuck right off!


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 16:44:40
Capacity shouldn't be much of a problem as we'll be non-league soon anyway!.....


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: otanswell on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 17:55:13
I doubt super marines ground is football league standard anyway


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Oaksey Moonraker on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 18:55:28
According to the BBC the club pay the council 17k a month rent plus all up keep costs which is 200k plus per year.Power is basically saying it is too much to pay for a staduim that is delapidated and costs will only go up.He is looking for a better deal for the club and in my opinion the council should be wary ,if we move out they will loose all the rental income plus they will be responsible for the upkeep.Ontop of this the land can only be used for sporting activity which was stipulated by the Goddard estate when it donated the land to the town of Swindon so worthless for development.

So annual rent is worth 204k to the council, if you looked at that over an extended lease then it's £1m every 5 years (excluding inflation increases) so if the club wanted a 50 years then the rental income is worth £10m to SBC so that's an idea of a likely value of the CG to SBC to replace lost rental income.

The club would need a 50 year lease to make any future ground improvements worthwhile if you look at the Arkells Stand is 40 plus years old and would be up for replacement/renovation by year 50.

If the club are spending £200k pa just keeping it ticking over then that's again £1m every 5 years and at some point Stratton Bank and the Town End will have to be replaced at probably £10m for the two and maybe another £5m for the Arkells.

I guess this means there will be interesting negotiations with the new lease. The club are probably facing a £25-30m outlay over the period of the new lease without even owning the ground. Do the club seek for SBC to fund improvements for a higher rent on the basis the improvements would pay for this from hospitality (we need £500 a day to cover the current rent).

Or do the club push hard on the value of the club in it's current location to the wider Swindon through business rates, expenditure by fans in pubs, shops, car parking which would be lost if the club moved away. Then there are the less tangible benefits such as profile for the town and the social benefits e.g. if the council had to offer FITC for kids what would be the cost.

Either way, we need to pay up the rent but you can see Power's reluctance to pay £200k on maintenance without the back up of an extended lease.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 19:08:36
we should just ask Bristol City if we can share their ground


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Paolo69 on Wednesday, December 24, 2014, 19:27:59
we should just ask Bristol City if we can share their ground

I'm already scared of going to hell on Easter Monday. Not sure I could handle it every fortnight.:-)


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: @mwooly63 on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 14:03:26
Interesting tweet from @ajferguson85

Quote
My mates mother-in-law is a lawyer for the council and she's said that they are repossessing the County Ground next week! @andrew_FLICW


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Honkytonk on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 14:19:34
What are they going to do, turn up and load it onto the back of a truck?


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 14:21:41
Load of bollocks


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 14:24:53
Load of bollocks
I have to agree, they can't repossess anything until it has at least gone to court...which isn't until the 5th Jan.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 14:33:31
Interesting tweet from @ajferguson85


perhaps they misunderstood when Power told them they could take everything that we have in the bank


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Honkytonk on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 14:35:19
perhaps they misunderstood when Power told them they could take everything that we have in the bank

Away fans or schoolkids?


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: @mwooly63 on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 15:15:16
I have to agree, they can't repossess anything until it has at least gone to court...which isn't until the 5th Jan.

Which is next week
Personally think its bollox too, just put it out there as you never know with Stfc


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Saxondale on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 15:16:16
It would fit a pattern.  We go top, then it all goes tits up.  It is, after all, STFC.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Sippo on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 15:20:30
My mates sisters dog's postman said that the council were going to turn the cg into a massive supermarket.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Levi lapper on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 15:32:25
My mates sisters dog's postman said that the council were going to turn the cg into a massive supermarket.

They can apply to the court for possession which would be pretty fucking stupid as, if they were given possession, they would have fuck all revenue coming in for the foreseeable future plus they'd piss off everyone in swindon with an interest in football.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 15:34:14
'My mate's mother-in-law'

Oh do piss off  ::)


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: yogi bear on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 15:48:55
'My mate's mother-in-law'

I do piss off  ::)

I'm with you on that one but its a little more original than my mates brothers sisters boyfriends brothers girlfriends sisters aunt!


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Matt71 on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 15:56:50
I tweeted the council leader and asked hin if this was true ,his silence is deafening!


Title: Re: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: horlock07 on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 16:10:31
I tweeted the council leader and asked hin if this was true ,his silence is deafening!
I would suggest that entering into discussion with a random person on Twitter regarding contractual and legal matters between the council and a third party might be considered a little unprofessional for a councillor.

Therefore I would suggest his silence is less deafening and more sensible.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Sam Morshead on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 16:11:56
I'll put on record that I'm as sure as I can be that this (repossession next week) is not the case. That won't mean much to some of you, but never mind.


Title: Re:
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 16:15:34
In movie review quotes that translates as:

"...repossession next week..." Sam Morshead


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: herthab on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 16:31:04
Cooper's fucking off, Luongo, Foderingham, Kasim, Smith and Nathan are being sold and the grounds being turned into a Lidl.

Apart from the above, everything's rosy!


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: yogi bear on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 16:35:08
Cooper's fucking off, Luongo, Foderingham, Kasim, Smith and Nathan are being sold and the grounds being turned into a Lidl.

Apart from the above, everything's rosy!

Sound like a quote from otib


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: jonny72 on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 17:06:42
Let's say that SBC do reposses the CG....

We'd have to ground share, say with Cheltenham - not ideal even in the short term but we'd still be playing.

SBC on the other hand would have a football stadium with exactly zero other possible tenants. On top of the lost rent they'd be responsible for the upkeep, security, insurance, rates and so on. In total they'd probably be out £500k a year which they don't have and will have even less as their funding is cut further in the coming months/years.

Redeveloping it for other purposes wouldn't be easy and would take some time. There is the covenant, the community purchase right, planning permission, local opposition to the change of use and so on. Even if they sell it on the same issues apply.

In short, the CG is a white elephant and repossession would be a complete and utter disaster for SBC and the last thing they want. I'm guessing Power has come to a similar conclusion, has a potential backer lined up to redevelop the stadium and is thinking more and more that promotion to The Championship is a possibility. So he's decided now is the time to take SBC on, I'd guess he'd be looking to buy the ground or at minimum get a vastly reduce rent.

As regards the CG being repossessed next week, I'd say that claim is beyond complete and utter bollocks. There is only a few months arrears and a dispute over the payments and terms of the lease - no way in hell a judge would grant a repossession order especially at the first hearing.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: @mwooly63 on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 17:16:26
We don't have a lease
Ran out a long time ago (13 months iirc )

But your other points remain valid


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: JayBox325 on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 17:19:05
Let's say that SBC do reposses the CG....

We'd have to ground share, say with Cheltenham - not ideal even in the short term but we'd still be playing.

SBC on the other hand would have a football stadium with exactly zero other possible tenants. On top of the lost rent they'd be responsible for the upkeep, security, insurance, rates and so on. In total they'd probably be out £500k a year which they don't have and will have even less as their funding is cut further in the coming months/years.

Redeveloping it for other purposes wouldn't be easy and would take some time. There is the covenant, the community purchase right, planning permission, local opposition to the change of use and so on. Even if they sell it on the same issues apply.

In short, the CG is a white elephant and repossession would be a complete and utter disaster for SBC and the last thing they want. I'm guessing Power has come to a similar conclusion, has a potential backer lined up to redevelop the stadium and is thinking more and more that promotion to The Championship is a possibility. So he's decided now is the time to take SBC on, I'd guess he'd be looking to buy the ground or at minimum get a vastly reduce rent.

As regards the CG being repossessed next week, I'd say that claim is beyond complete and utter bollocks. There is only a few months arrears and a dispute over the payments and terms of the lease - no way in hell a judge would grant a repossession order especially at the first hearing.

Buzz-killington.

But my brother's ex's dad's former room-mate said this is all true. We're also ground-sharing with Bath City.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 17:19:47
Sound like a quote from otib

and our 12 loan players are going back in January

...now it sounds like otib


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: jonny72 on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 17:23:00
We don't have a lease
Ran out a long time ago (13 months iirc )

But your other points remain valid

SBC said the original lease is still in effect, on a month by month basis I believe. They used some special term to describe it, I'd guess it's similar to how a residential lease continues once the original period has expired.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: JayBox325 on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 17:23:27
and our 12 loan players are going back in January

...now it sounds like otib

Not enough use of the word 'Swindle' to be OTIB.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 17:24:08
or the phrase 'administration'


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: jonny72 on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 17:25:11
Buzz-killington.

Perhaps one of our more jovial members could get the ground listed as available for rent on RightMove.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Sir Pissalot on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 17:35:44
You lot have got over-active imaginations and too much time on your hands.   :)


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Sippo on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 17:46:41
Let's say that SBC do reposses the CG....

We'd have to ground share, say with Cheltenham - not ideal even in the short term but we'd still be playing.

SBC on the other hand would have a football stadium with exactly zero other possible tenants. On top of the lost rent they'd be responsible for the upkeep, security, insurance, rates and so on. In total they'd probably be out £500k a year which they don't have and will have even less as their funding is cut further in the coming months/years.

Redeveloping it for other purposes wouldn't be easy and would take some time. There is the covenant, the community purchase right, planning permission, local opposition to the change of use and so on. Even if they sell it on the same issues apply.

In short, the CG is a white elephant and repossession would be a complete and utter disaster for SBC and the last thing they want. I'm guessing Power has come to a similar conclusion, has a potential backer lined up to redevelop the stadium and is thinking more and more that promotion to The Championship is a possibility. So he's decided now is the time to take SBC on, I'd guess he'd be looking to buy the ground or at minimum get a vastly reduce rent.

As regards the CG being repossessed next week, I'd say that claim is beyond complete and utter bollocks. There is only a few months arrears and a dispute over the payments and terms of the lease - no way in hell a judge would grant a repossession order especially at the first hearing.

This is the reason why sbc will always reject a new build stadium out of town.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: yogi bear on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 17:50:17
Not enough use of the word 'Swindle' to be OTIB.

I'm surprised it not breaking news on their thread as they've normally got their trolls keeping tabs on us. As an observation let's see how long it takes! Also they missed the copper Brighton link in the daily mail. Not as upto date as they like to think they are


Title: Re: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: horlock07 on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 17:59:53
SBC said the original lease is still in effect, on a month by month basis I believe. They used some special term to describe it, I'd guess it's similar to how a residential lease continues once the original period has expired.
The lease has expired however the club are holding over while a new is agreed so presently provisions remain as per expired lease remain in force unless agreed by both parties.

My only very slight concern and I doubt it would lead to repossession is that with an election coming up some smart arse councillor may be seeking to make a big deal about this and driving the council's agenda.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: ronnie21 on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 18:36:11
The lease has expired however the club are holding over while a new is agreed so presently provisions remain as per expired lease remain in force unless agreed by both parties.

My only very slight concern and I doubt it would lead to repossession is that with an election coming up some smart arse councillor may be seeking to make a big deal about this and driving the council's agenda.
Yeah, some smart arse councillor like Councillor Dale "Grinner" Heenan, who according to some of his fellow councillors is definitely trying to be come a career politician!  He's already fucked up the roads around Swindon so fucking over the football club would be easy meat for him!!


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 18:42:58
who according to some of his fellow councillors is definitely trying to be come a career politician!

This is a euphemism for cunt right?


Title: Re: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: jonny72 on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 18:55:10
This is the reason why sbc will always reject a new build stadium out of town.

They wouldn't have any say if it was built outside the SBC boundary, which the Swindon urban area has already expanded out of in places.

My only very slight concern and I doubt it would lead to repossession is that with an election coming up some smart arse councillor may be seeking to make a big deal about this and driving the council's agenda.

What agenda though? Only positive outcome I can see for the councillor's is a long term lease or sale on Power's terms. Just needs Power to stand up to them and their aggressive stance becomes the house of cards it's always been.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: TheDukeOfBanbury on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 19:01:54
You lot have got over-active imaginations and too much time on your hands.   :)

Should be going to the games instead.....ouch ;)


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: ronnie21 on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 19:16:50
Should be going to the games instead.....ouch ;)
soapy tit wank, but all the councillors and mp's will be going to games as election day looms - photo opportunity etc. 


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 19:22:41
The only bus lane that is open to regular traffic in Swindon is on Polaris Way. It also happens to be right next to North Star House - Dale Heenan's place of work.

Surely a coincidence though.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: TheDukeOfBanbury on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 19:25:04
soapy tit wank, but all the councillors and mp's will be going to games as election day looms - photo opportunity etc.  

Good shout that.
Too far away to know the ins and outs of the Swindon Council. However just wish we had a few die hard Swindon fans on the Council who wanted the best for the Club.
The CG needs an upgrade for sure.


Title: Re: Re: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: horlock07 on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 19:51:02

What agenda though? Only positive outcome I can see for the councillor's is a long term lease or sale on Power's terms. Just needs Power to stand up to them and their aggressive stance becomes the house of cards it's always been.

'Look at me serving the people of Swindon,  this club have taken the piss for years not paying the rent etc! I have played hard ball with them, taken no shit threatened court and secured a new lease on preferential terms for SBC' A bit of spin and councillor makes name for himself.

FWIW I don't see it going so far but by getting all this shit out into the media early doors I cannot believe that someone at the council has a reason for this!


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: The Grim Reaper on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 20:32:51
A move away from The County Ground is the only logical answer. If Power can secure funding and developers for a new stadium I hope we build it out of SBC area, I.e Wootton Bassett J16 etc. Would love to see SBC stuck with a white elephant they can't do jack shit with.


Title: Re:
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 20:34:31
That would be cutting our nose off to spite our face, no?


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: The Grim Reaper on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 21:04:27
Not if Power secures us a purpose built stadium which is ours without the hassles of being a Tennant.


Title: Re:
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 21:23:11
I mean the fans liking the CG becoming a white elephant for the council. I'm sure it would work for power but as a fan id think it disastrous to move to Bassett.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: The Grim Reaper on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 21:42:29
Not specifically Bassett but somewhere non SBC.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Samdy Gray on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 21:43:41
Wiltshire Council seem to like dumping developments right on the border at the moment. Maybe they have some land up for grabs.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Not that Nice If I'm Honest on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 22:29:50
A move away from The County Ground is the only logical answer. If Power can secure funding and developers for a new stadium I hope we build it out of SBC area, I.e Wootton Bassett J16 etc. Would love to see SBC stuck with a white elephant they can't do jack shit with.

Then we can be like Colchester, Oxford, Northampton etc etc etc

And yearn for the days before we moved to a soulless concrete edifice 


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: jonny72 on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 22:31:23
There are lots of places to the north/north-west that wouldn't be the end of the world. Transport would be an issue with some but not with others such as somewhere just off the A419. For a bigger development there is an option of building near the train line and adding a station.

Not saying I'm necessarily in favour of it, but there are very limited development options with the current ground footprint even if the whole thing was demolished and rebuilt anew.

At minimum it's a strong argument to use as a bargaining chip with the council. Power making a few calls to Cheltenham FC and Wiltshire Council would put the wind up them and the councillors wouldn't want to be the ones that let the club move out of the borough.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Levi lapper on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 22:47:00
The council,owning the freehold and us developing the ground is the best option for the club in the long run if they can make a deal stack up. A new ground in woot ton Bassett?
Fuck that shit, it's swindon town not Wiltshire football club.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: manc_red on Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 23:47:23
Then we can be like Colchester, Oxford, Northampton etc etc etc

And yearn for the days before we moved to a soulless concrete edifice 

Add Cardiff to that. I've yet to meet a Cardiff fan who wouldn't give their left bollock to be back at Ninian Park. Absolutely zero atmosphere apparently, even when they were doing well in the championship and in the premier.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Barry Scott on Wednesday, December 31, 2014, 00:20:40
If it's sticking 2 fingers up to the council and landing them with another white elephant, I'm all for it. And I suppose the location of Swindon means we're lucky that we can move elsewhere. We've so many other close council's that we'd still be in Swindon, in all but name, but away from the comedy of ineptitude that is SBC. And regarding losing the atmosphere, I can only assume those commenters haven't attended for a while.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Levi lapper on Wednesday, December 31, 2014, 05:08:16
Another white elephant you will all have to pay for? The council belongs to the people of swindon, there may be some shit councillers there at the moment but the point of democracy is you can remove them, it's not about personalities for fucks sake. Unbelievable apathy.  :no:


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Leggett on Wednesday, December 31, 2014, 07:04:41
Regardless of who's in the council, they couldn't give two shits about the football club.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Not that Nice If I'm Honest on Wednesday, December 31, 2014, 07:43:13
If Swindon has a population of 200,000, and 10,000 of them follow the Town (in my experience a good chunk of support comes from surrounding towns), then 1 in 20 residents gives a damn.

Therefore, STFC is quite rightly way down the list of council priorities, behind education, social services, roads, refuse etc etc.
STFC have agreed numerous deals with the council to pay rent on the CG, and have reneged on most of them.
If I was SBC, I would be glad to see the club leave, so I don't see what "hardball" the club can play.

And as for trying to seriously influence the council election with 5% of the electorate, then good luck.

I won't be popular for saying it, (and I'm the biggest advocate of staying at the CG) but that is the situation I'm afraid.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, December 31, 2014, 10:23:45
Regardless of who's in the council, they couldn't give two shits about the football club.

 :nod:  End of subject.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Ardiles on Wednesday, December 31, 2014, 10:31:00
If Swindon has a population of 200,000, and 10,000 of them follow the Town (in my experience a good chunk of support comes from surrounding towns), then 1 in 20 residents gives a damn.

Almost.  Probably more like 1 in 4 or 1 in 5 gives a damn of some description.  And 1 in 20 gives enough of a damn to attend games regularly.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Barry Scott on Wednesday, December 31, 2014, 10:56:21
Another white elephant you will all have to pay for? The council belongs to the people of swindon, there may be some shit councillers there at the moment but the point of democracy is you can remove them, it's not about personalities for fucks sake. Unbelievable apathy.  :no:

Well I pay for all the other stupidty those cunts waste my taxes on, so yes. And to think that voting for a slightly different brand of bellend in some way helps is rather far-fetched in my opinion.

I utterly loathe and abominate SBC.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Oaksey Moonraker on Wednesday, December 31, 2014, 17:40:58
Found this about Plymouth paying £135k a year for Home Park after they sold the ground back to the council and retaining a right to buy back at 12 times the annual rent. Makes our £200k a year plus maintenance and improvements being our responsibility a bit steep.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-15354187


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, December 31, 2014, 17:48:35
Found this about Plymouth paying £135k a year for Home Park after they sold the ground back to the council and retaining a right to buy back at 12 times the annual rent. Makes our £200k a year plus maintenance and improvements being our responsibility a bit steep.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-15354187

But the rent goes up 150% if they get back to the Championship, and 300% for a first visit to the top flight.

The basic difference here, is that Plymuff council, are obviously aware of both the commercial and cultural importance to the city....no longer the case in Swindon.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Oaksey Moonraker on Wednesday, December 31, 2014, 18:11:23
But the rent goes up 150% if they get back to the Championship, and 300% for a first visit to the top flight.

The basic difference here, is that Plymuff council, are obviously aware of both the commercial and cultural importance to the city....no longer the case in Swindon.

Or Donny paying £100k a year reduced to £10k in the first 10 years with the council paying £400k towards improvements. Interesting juxtaposition with Coventry's £1m a year rent in this.

http://www.ccfc.co.uk/news/article/club-statement-261212-559871.aspx

I guess in the ownership turmoil of since the Fitton/Black ownership we have not engaged SBC about moving forward


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, December 31, 2014, 18:44:57
I guess in the ownership turmoil of since the Fitton/Black ownership we have not engaged SBC about moving forward

SBC's problem, is that the plan set in motion post war, has hit the buffers.  In essence, that was develop housing....often social housing and in return for increased revenues, look to attract companies, and build community facilities....so we got things like Oasis, Link, Wyvern, CG Ext athletics, Golf Course, Lydiard.  Big ideas like a University, could be seriously contemplated.

Unfortunately, toxic Thatcherite policy from a string of central and local governments, has left SBC with a rump of responsibilties, that can't be privatised....and having to take on board more private housing development, with inadequate infrastructure. 

Other societal changes, like in the world of retail, have left both officers and councillors giving a very decent impression of essentially washing their hands of the Town, and vaguely hoping the great God of laissez-faire capitalism will sort it out.

This leaves STFC in a very dodgy position, as laissez-faire capitalism would surely just close down such a loss making, venture, flog off the ground and build something more profitable....


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: kerry red on Monday, January 5, 2015, 14:27:54
At least this has now been sorted


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Flashheart on Monday, January 5, 2015, 14:28:32
At least this has now been sorted

It has? Oh good!

What's next then?


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: 4D on Monday, January 5, 2015, 14:29:57
It has? Oh good!

What's next then?

Just refer to the font of knowledge on all things STFC, pop a look at OTIB.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: kerry red on Monday, January 5, 2015, 14:34:58
It's on there?

FFS. I feel like I'm being stalked


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Flashheart on Monday, January 5, 2015, 14:37:42
Oh for crying out load, it is on there as well.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Flashheart on Monday, January 5, 2015, 14:38:37
Ha ha. That's made me giggle. How very embarrassing.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: horlock07 on Monday, January 5, 2015, 14:39:31
I'm am not sure how to take this quote from Sangita..

“We’re honourable, believe it or not,'


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Costanza on Monday, January 5, 2015, 14:40:21
Ha ha. That's made me giggle. How very embarrassing.

According to one, Town are the 'axis of evil' along with MKD.

They're getting creative.



Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: kerry red on Monday, January 5, 2015, 14:43:24
I'm beginning to think it would be more fun watching them not getting promoted than us actually doing so!


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Peter Venkman on Monday, January 5, 2015, 14:46:11
Oh for crying out load, it is on there as well.
Yes because they care.

Quote
Considering their infrastructure (or lack of) and wage bill now Di Canios era is pretty much 'gone', they are punching well above their weight.

There are much better run clubs in the divisions below.

It does still startle me on as to how they're maintaining their position. They've the potential to fall out of the top 6 as there seems to be a good chance of some 'movement' in January ;)

They are skint and struggling to keep up with regular running of a club. Swindon fans may think they got a little dosh, but they're on the brink.

Its good to have an insight into how OUR club is being run, especially by fans of other clubs :yawn:


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Costanza on Monday, January 5, 2015, 14:46:15
I'm beginning to think it would be more fun watching them not getting promoted than us actually doing so!

As a Bristol based Swindon fan, I will have my very own open top bus parade across South Bristol if Town went up and City didn't*





*To the OTIB lurkers, I'm joking.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Summerof69 on Monday, January 5, 2015, 15:04:26
Its good to have an insight into how OUR club is being run, especially by fans of other clubs :yawn:

They are accusing us of being skint, yet without being bankrolled they would've gone bust.

How much did the lose in the last year? £15m?

Even Di Canio didn't spend that much !!


Title: Re:
Post by: Batch on Monday, January 5, 2015, 15:07:54
He not bluffing. He'll do it.


Do any Swindon fans really think we 'have a little dosh'?  I think most on here know the model of funding and it's nip and tuck nature.

Obviously we'd all like to be losing £10m a season on overpaid underachievers that gets covered by our benifactor, but we aren't as massive as the Manchester Uniteds, and the Bristol city (1982) limiteds.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Red Frog on Monday, January 5, 2015, 15:12:50
Never noticed how appropriate the term Bristol City Limited is.  :)


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Oxfordhater on Monday, January 5, 2015, 15:17:22
It will be a Shame when they are no longer funded by thier sugar daddy? I'm sure their is a framework in place for when he leaves the club permanently and leaves them up shit street?

He's not doing a very good job though is he and I feel sorry for him, massive wagebill and losses and playing in the third tier with a bigger budget and smaller attendances than most championship clubs.

Of all the clubs he ends up with a club like Bristol City.


Title: Re:
Post by: Batch on Monday, January 5, 2015, 15:29:13
If I'm honest I think he's been brilliant for them in so much that we'd all like that kind of unconditional funding.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Flashheart on Monday, January 5, 2015, 15:30:39
If I were him I'd find a good DOF to handle the football side of things for me.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Costanza on Monday, January 5, 2015, 15:41:07
Most lower teams dream of having a Lansdown type owner. Most enjoy more success under such ownership but for all of his work/money both Bristol City and Bristol Rugby have enjoyed next to nothing on the pitch. The League One  title would be spun well but they really shouldn't be in this division in the first place (under Lansdown ownership).

Even their academy hasn't produced nearly as many successes as it should have. Joe Bryan looks like the best product they've had for a long while.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Oxfordhater on Monday, January 5, 2015, 16:03:40
I heard once that Plymouth was the biggest city in Western Europe never to grace the top tier..

I think you can say Bristol is the biggest City In Western Europe never to accomplish or win anything in Sport..


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Tails on Monday, January 5, 2015, 16:10:00
When did our fans ever think we had any money? Quite the contrary on here.

I stopped going on OTIB a few days after we beat them (boy wasnt that fun). But from what I've seen on here, it's like reading a bitter ex-girlfriends facebook.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Costanza on Monday, January 5, 2015, 16:12:38
When did our fans ever think we had any money? Quite the contrary on here.

I stopped going on OTIB a few days after we beat them (boy wasnt that fun). But from what I've seen on here, it's like reading a bitter ex-girlfriends facebook.

Haha. I'm sure the news of the Redditch/Hylton complaint will give them a new thread.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Peter Venkman on Monday, January 5, 2015, 16:32:47
But from what I've seen on here, it's like reading a bitter ex-girlfriends facebook.
(http://casselsbrewery.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/wigram-bestbitter.png)


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Power to people on Monday, January 5, 2015, 16:39:41
Didn't power say he didn't beleive we should be paying the whole rent due to the state of the repairs required, and now it seems they have agreed to pay the whole lot in installments.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Mother Brown on Monday, January 5, 2015, 16:42:19
I heard once that Plymouth was the biggest city in Western Europe never to grace the top tier..

I think you can say Bristol is the biggest City In Western Europe never to accomplish or win anything in Sport..
Did"nt City win the Welsh cup ?


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Oxfordhater on Monday, January 5, 2015, 17:04:25
Did"nt City win the Welsh cup ?

My bad, tbf they are the 5th most successful team in Wales.
 :)


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Monday, January 5, 2015, 19:43:04
Didn't power say he didn't beleive we should be paying the whole rent due to the state of the repairs required, and now it seems they have agreed to pay the whole lot in installments.

Using it to get us a better deal in terms of payment structure. Decent result for us. Hopefully we can sort a long term lease out in the next fee months.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Sir Pissalot on Monday, January 5, 2015, 19:50:43
Does anyone know what the £300K "maintenance costs" figure mentioned in the Adver report refers to specifically?  I don't remember seeing that figure mentioned before anywhere in reports relating to the ongoing negotiation with SBC.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Mother Brown on Monday, January 5, 2015, 20:09:47
My bad, tbf they are the 5th most successful team in Wales.
 :)

Not forgetting the gas,Watney cup winners 1972  :yay:


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Summerof69 on Monday, January 5, 2015, 20:12:53
Not forgetting the gas,Watney cup winners 1972  :yay:

That's old City, prior to 1982.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, January 6, 2015, 07:47:58
Does anyone know what the £300K "maintenance costs" figure mentioned in the Adver report refers to specifically?  I don't remember seeing that figure mentioned before anywhere in reports relating to the ongoing negotiation with SBC.
Didn't the judge announce that no details of payments etc were allowed to be in the public domain or something like that. I am sure I read that somewhere.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, January 6, 2015, 07:52:15
Yeah on the BBC.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-30684906

Quote
The terms of the deal between the club and the council will remain confidential, the court was told.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Tuesday, January 6, 2015, 09:25:31
Council money. If anyone is that interested, bang in a freedom of information request.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: ronnie21 on Tuesday, January 6, 2015, 10:25:10
Council money. If anyone is that interested, bang in a freedom of information request.
Is it just a case of sending a letter to the chief executive requesting some info on a freedom of information?  I would be interested to know how much the council has raked in on fines on motorists for using the bus lanes since the cameras were installed?


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: jonny72 on Tuesday, January 6, 2015, 10:27:45
You can make a request via their website; http://www.swindon.gov.uk/cd/foi/Pages/cd-foi-contact.aspx


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Barry Scott on Tuesday, January 6, 2015, 12:55:33
Is it just a case of sending a letter to the chief executive requesting some info on a freedom of information?  I would be interested to know how much the council has raked in on fines on motorists for using the bus lanes since the cameras were installed?

Where are these cameras? Do they even exist? It'd be nice to once again use Whalebridge the way SBC didn't intend.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Sippo on Tuesday, January 6, 2015, 13:11:30
There's one on Cricklade Road heading into town just before the Moonies.

Not sure where the others are mind.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Sippo on Tuesday, January 6, 2015, 13:12:33
Also remember, you can use some Bus lanes from 7pm to 7am even if there are camera's.



Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Shrivvy on Tuesday, January 6, 2015, 13:46:16
Shah seemed to be treating it like a huge victory when all she's got is a payment plan for the 50k and a few meetings she could have arranged anyway.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: ronnie21 on Tuesday, January 6, 2015, 14:00:56
Also remember, you can use some Bus lanes from 7pm to 7am even if there are camera's.


There are supposed to be five cameras which they said they were going to move around, but the one on Cricklade Road has been there since they purchased it!  The others are meant to be on pinch-points such as the one that is buses only in Ferndale Road, also just off Rodbourne Road and in West Swindon.  the once on Cricklade Road is certainly doing its job, cars and lorries no longer use the bus lane during the day, but I do understand they have been fining - or trying to fine - taxis who are entitled to use bus lanes - another Councillor Heenan cock-up!!


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Power to people on Tuesday, January 6, 2015, 16:37:28
There are supposed to be five cameras which they said they were going to move around, but the one on Cricklade Road has been there since they purchased it!  The others are meant to be on pinch-points such as the one that is buses only in Ferndale Road, also just off Rodbourne Road and in West Swindon.  the once on Cricklade Road is certainly doing its job, cars and lorries no longer use the bus lane during the day, but I do understand they have been fining - or trying to fine - taxis who are entitled to use bus lanes - another Councillor Heenan cock-up!!

And it makes it worse inthe morning's now as all traffic piles back in that direction - what was the problem using it in the morning only about 1 bus an hour uses it anyway


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: horlock07 on Tuesday, January 6, 2015, 16:40:07
Council money. If anyone is that interested, bang in a freedom of information request.

I suspect the amount that can be revealed by FoI will be limited a little as it relates to a commercial agreement with a private non-council entity. However there is nothing to stop banging an FoI request in.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Cookie on Tuesday, January 6, 2015, 17:26:28
Be very specific and detailed with questions on FOIs otherwise it's fairly easy to dodge. As said above though, commercial agreements won't be revealed due to commercial confidentiality clause.

The club are in a competitive market even regarding ground rental with egg chasers playing wherever they like so is fair enough.


Title: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Frigby Daser on Tuesday, January 6, 2015, 18:19:15
FOI applies to any information the Council holds. The fact there is a private entity is involved is irrelevant.

Commercial confidentiality isn't applicable for FoI either (I.e. Merely marking an agreement as confidential won't do it) - standard  confidentiality clauses will have a carve out for things such as FoI disclosures. Confidentiality only applies in very limited circumstances, such as disclosing a third parties intellectual property. It is a very high threshold to meet.

The council would most likely disclose it, but redact the financials under the commercial interests exemption. They'd need to show the public interest in withholding that information is greater than the public interest in disclosure. Their argument would be that disclosing the numbers and profile of payments would inhibit their ability to negotiate terms with othrr tenants, to the public detriment.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Oaksey Moonraker on Tuesday, January 6, 2015, 21:41:07
What would be interesting is what expenditure the council have made at the County Ground since the turn of the century or future planning SBC have made for the long term future of the site. Other than maybe resurfacing the car park, very little. As SBC issue the safety certificate, they determine a lot of the maintenance expenditure.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Frigby Daser on Tuesday, January 6, 2015, 22:50:40
What would be interesting is what expenditure the council have made at the County Ground since the turn of the century or future planning SBC have made for the long term future of the site. Other than maybe resurfacing the car park, very little. As SBC issue the safety certificate, they determine a lot of the maintenance expenditure.

All of which would be entirely disclosable.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: horlock07 on Tuesday, January 6, 2015, 23:10:19
What would be interesting is what expenditure the council have made at the County Ground since the turn of the century or future planning SBC have made for the long term future of the site. Other than maybe resurfacing the car park, very little. As SBC issue the safety certificate, they determine a lot of the maintenance expenditure.

I would suspect that as the Council are of the opinion that the lease is a full maintaining lease and it would appear that Power is the first to question this I would suspect there will not be much for the Council to disclose as their maintenance contribution is probably in the region of nothing.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: horlock07 on Tuesday, January 6, 2015, 23:13:06
FOI applies to any information the Council holds. The fact there is a private entity is involved is irrelevant.

Commercial confidentiality isn't applicable for FoI either (I.e. Merely marking an agreement as confidential won't do it) - standard  confidentiality clauses will have a carve out for things such as FoI disclosures. Confidentiality only applies in very limited circumstances, such as disclosing a third parties intellectual property. It is a very high threshold to meet.

The council would most likely disclose it, but redact the financials under the commercial interests exemption. They'd need to show the public interest in withholding that information is greater than the public interest in disclosure. Their argument would be that disclosing the numbers and profile of payments would inhibit their ability to negotiate terms with othrr tenants, to the public detriment.

Interesting you say this as when I previously worked in a public sector role (not a council) our Information Officers could find any number of excuses not to provide information for legal reasons - sadly normally after I had spent hours digging stuff out and passing it to them!


Title: Re: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Frigby Daser on Tuesday, January 6, 2015, 23:25:42
Interesting you say this as when I previously worked in a public sector role (not a council) our Information Officers could find any number of excuses not to provide information for legal reasons - sadly normally after I had spent hours digging stuff out and passing it to them!
Whether or not they're valid reasons is entirely different.

If you want to withhold, if you haven't got valid or particularly robust grounds to, you'll likely throw as much at it and hope whoever wants it loses interest -  a common tactic with journalistic requests, for example, because the story often becomes old before the timescales elapse.

If you want the information, it's worth understanding how the exemptions actually apply (i.e. how the information commissioner would find at a tribunal) so you can navigate your way through intentional or unintentional bullshit from the public authority.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: @mwooly63 on Friday, January 16, 2015, 15:03:20
Sam Morshead @SamMorshead_  ·  15m 15 minutes ago
Quote
Swindon Town were due to be at County Court again today. Only made aware of it in last hour so not present and no further details.

 :hmmm:
Dont know if to do with rent or something else


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: lambourn red on Friday, January 16, 2015, 15:28:21
I would imagine it was to sign and seal the payment plan for the outstanding debt

The tweet he was replying to was

Any reason why I would have seen Lee Power and Sangita Shah leave magistrates' court approx 1:30pm today? All smiles too


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: kerry red on Friday, January 16, 2015, 15:30:39
He'd just slipped her one in the bogs?


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: @mwooly63 on Friday, January 16, 2015, 15:43:27
Sam Morshead ‏@SamMorshead_  3m3 minutes ago Canterbury, England
The case involving Swindon Town at the County Court today is not an offshoot of the hearing regarding rent arrears.

Plot thickens


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: kerry red on Friday, January 16, 2015, 15:45:17
Where's the Adver when we need 'em!


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Sir Pissalot on Friday, January 16, 2015, 15:54:11
Can't see anything obvious in today's listings.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: JayBox325 on Friday, January 16, 2015, 16:55:52
Could be to do with this article? http://swindonlink.com/news/do-you-recognise-stfc-laptop-thief


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: StfcRusty on Friday, January 16, 2015, 17:03:02
I would imagine it was to sign and seal the payment plan for the outstanding debt

The tweet he was replying to was

Any reason why I would have seen Lee Power and Sangita Shah leave magistrates' court approx 1:30pm today? All smiles too

Magistrates Court and County Court are different buildings. If it really was the Mags, it won't be anything to do with a civil debt


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: tans on Friday, January 16, 2015, 20:29:27
http://m.gazetteandherald.co.uk/news/11731827.Swindon_Town_lose___36k_legal_fight_with_former_performance_analyst_over_sacking/


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: bigbobjoylove on Friday, January 16, 2015, 20:41:09
Do I remember him being quite highly rated by Di Canio, so much so he wanted to take him to Sunderland?


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Flashheart on Friday, January 16, 2015, 20:48:34
Have Ron Terry and Fredi ever been seen in the same room together?  :hmmm:


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: StfcRusty on Friday, January 16, 2015, 20:52:57
Probably unconnected but Ronny Terry writes regular health and fitness articles for ... The Swindon Advertiser


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Red Frog on Friday, January 16, 2015, 20:59:52
Have Ron Terry and Fredi ever been seen in the same room together?  :hmmm:

Hmm. Good thought. Though wasn't Fredi mainly slagging off Jed, when Ron's problem seems to be with Power? You have to hope Power has the money and patience to keep paying for tying up the loose ends from the previous regime.

Though there's probably another lesson in there around being careful about respecting employment law when seeking to remove staff, something football clubs are notoriously poor at. Their hire 'n' fire mentality isn't really compatible with the patience required to assemble a proper dossier showing just cause for dismissal.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Red and Proud on Friday, January 16, 2015, 21:23:48
http://m.gazetteandherald.co.uk/news/11731827.Swindon_Town_lose___36k_legal_fight_with_former_performance_analyst_over_sacking/

I guess if Power is adamant that the court decision is incorrect then he/STFC will appeal.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Flashheart on Friday, January 16, 2015, 21:28:50
I guess if Power is adamant that the court decision is incorrect then he/STFC will appeal.

For 36k, is it worth it?


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Costanza on Friday, January 16, 2015, 21:29:35
For 36k, is it worth it?

I would hope that Power would move on from this.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Flashheart on Friday, January 16, 2015, 21:31:29
I would hope that Power would move on from this.

 :nod:


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: theakston2k on Friday, January 16, 2015, 21:34:44
Probably unconnected but Ronny Terry writes regular health and fitness articles for ... The Swindon Advertiser
If that's the case might explain some of Power's ill feeling if he feels this guy has bee stirring in the background...assuming it's the same guy obviously.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Sir Pissalot on Friday, January 16, 2015, 21:36:56


Anyone else surprised to read that Power's legal rep had gone into administration?  With the amount of business that Power has put his way since taking over at STFC, I would have thought the guy would have been placing an order for a Rolls Royce, rather than going into administration.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Red and Proud on Friday, January 16, 2015, 21:52:23

Anyone else surprised to read that Power's legal rep had gone into administration?  With the amount of business that Power has put his way since taking over at STFC, I would have thought the guy would have been placing an order for a Rolls Royce, rather than going into administration.

Assuming all his clients paid their bills on time.....


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: tans on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 07:30:12
Todays front page.

Really?


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 07:31:41
Yes it really happened.

Odd one for the front page though.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 07:55:28
Todays front page.

Really?
Oooh, look at how pissed off she looks, that must have hit her proper hard. And look at Hylton having a good laugh about it - and that looks like another Swindle player congratulating him. I hates them six fingered inbreds, vile little club - they've GOT to get a 10 point deduction for this - I dunno how they gets away with it I don't, you couldn't make it up you couldn't....etc etc

This is how I imagine 'certain people' reacting to it ...  8)


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: suttonred on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 08:03:14
All my daughter got at Bromley was a plaster for her nose, better tell her to dye her hair blonde for next time..


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: @mwooly63 on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 08:21:14
All my daughter got at Bromley was a plaster for her nose, better tell her to dye her hair blonde for next time..

Keeper coach spoke to her on twitter Saturday, offered her tickets for her and her nephew for next game  ( he was a mascot and she missed seeing him and the first half )


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: PetsWinPrizes on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 09:37:58
 "I was in so much pain when I came around I thought I’d been bottled."

Note not punched, not hit, bottled.

Amazing.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: pauld on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 09:39:56
"I was in so much pain when I came around I thought I’d been bottled."

Note not punched, not hit, bottled.
Fisted?


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: kerry red on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 09:48:09
One of Hylton's stray balls, eh.

He must be packing, that lad!


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Bob's Orange on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 10:30:31
Keeper coach spoke to her on twitter Saturday, offered her tickets for her and her nephew for next game  ( he was a mascot and she missed seeing him and the first half )

I read that on Twitter. he was pretty worried and she responded that she was fine etc. Not sure this is front page news really!


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Abrahammer on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 11:00:45
Not sure this is front page news really!

It's not news full stop


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Bob's Orange on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 11:09:38
It's not news full stop

Quite!


Title: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 11:31:05
if the adver read this, pm me, I'll tell you about the time  former juventus player Vincent perricard nearly killed my first born during a warm up at Walsall.

to be fair it was a sledge hammer shot that missed his head by an inch. he wasn't expecting it either, what with being stood at the back of the stand.

I'll get him practising his shocked face, just in case there is a slow news day coming up..


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: herthab on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 11:45:39
I nearly got hit by a wild shot at the game on Saturday. It only missed me by about 20 feet to the left and about 10 rows above me. Since this near miss I've had difficulty in sleeping and keep replaying the incident in my head; what if it hit me? I think the Club needs to do something for loyal fans like me, who have been mentally scarred.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: pauld on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 11:52:08
It's only the mental scarring that keeps you loyal, though


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: PetsWinPrizes on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 12:01:43
My mates Dad got knocked clean of his feet in the Town End by a stray warm up shot from Fjortoft.

The flying Norwegian ran over, apologised and that was that.

Though in hindsight I think the club owes him, and me, 20 years worth of season tickets, in cash.
With interest.

 


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Flashheart on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 12:04:17
My mates Dad got knocked clean of his feet in the Town End by a stray warm up shot from Fjortoft.

The flying Norwegian ran over, apologised and that was that.

Though in hindsight I think the club owes him, and me, 20 years worth of season tickets, in cash.
With interest.

 

I think the adver should run a Sunday special on that. Things like this need to be exposed.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: chalkies_shorts on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 12:05:19
if the adver read this, pm me, I'll tell you about the time  former juventus player Vincent perricard nearly killed my first born during a warm up at Walsall.

to be fair it was a sledge hammer shot that missed his head by an inch. he wasn't expecting it either, what with being stood at the back of the stand.

I'll get him practising his shocked face, just in case there is a slow news day coming up..
If that was the game we won 2-1, you must have been sat right next to me as a Pericard shot nearly took my daughter out in the warm up. We were towards the back. Saying that Pericard probably nearly took most people out both before and during the game althuogh he did net one.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 12:12:52
If that was the game we won 2-1, you must have been sat right next to me as a Pericard shot nearly took my daughter out in the warm up. We were towards the back. Saying that Pericard probably nearly took most people out both before and during the game althuogh he did net one.

Yeah, on reflection probably not an exclusive club really. Page 2 it is.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 12:26:43
 It's one of those things you should learn at a very early age, that if you go into the TE, while the players are kicking in, then it is hazardous....Town have had many a player, with only a passing acquaintance with the white rectangular thing with the onion bag strung up on it.

 Much better to hang about in pub or outside until approx a couple of mins before KO.....also means you don't have to watch Rockin Robin, or feel, nauseous when UB 40 is played.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Bob's Orange on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 12:29:51
It's one of those things you should learn at a very early age, that if you go into the TE, while the players are kicking in, then it is hazardous....Town have had many a player, with only a passing acquaintance with the white rectangular thing with the onion bag strung up on it.

 Much better to hang about in pub or outside until approx a couple of mins before KO.....also means you don't have to watch Rockin Robin, or feel, nauseous when UB 40 is played.

I hope you are all listening to what the wise man said.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Power to people on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 12:53:56
The adver are going the right way to getting their ban lifted - or do they now class themselves as the only media to print a negative story as the others have been 'got at'


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Red Frog on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 13:00:33
And Donkey got hit in the forehead last season sitting in the DRS. Good god, no-one is safe. Maybe the Adver could sponsor helmets for us all. Purple would be appropriate I think.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: horlock07 on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 13:09:04
"I was in so much pain when I came around I thought I’d been bottled."

Note not punched, not hit, bottled.

Amazing.

And she hit a pole on the way down... 'they come over here, hitting our girls as they fall over - bloody eastern Europeans!'

Sorry I am taking the Daily Mail approach!


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Honkytonk on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 13:28:21
I once got hit in the head whilst playing football of all things, the ball came off and went in the goal and everyone was celebrating but I was immediately on the phone to the local rag and my lawyer to sue for damages.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: 4D on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 13:42:29
Pretty sure I saw a ball hit a coffee out of the hand of a fan behind the goal, many years ago.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: 4D on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 13:44:51
I like this fella  :)

http://youtu.be/uGn2Iq6rtXI


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 13:46:51
And Donkey got hit in the forehead last season sitting in the DRS. Good god, no-one is safe. Maybe the Adver could sponsor helmets for us all. Purple would be appropriate I think.

He still claims "that was a header" and that "he meant it". True story.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Red Frog on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 13:53:35
He still claims "that was a header" and that "he meant it". True story.

Yeah, like someone would vote themselves out of a free match ticket. Duh.  :doh:


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: The Grim Reaper on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 18:53:14
Cringeworthy non story from the adver, a paper that is a shadow of its former self. Surprised people still buy the rag.


Title: Re: 'Cooper on verge of Town exit' - Adver
Post by: donkey on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 21:13:10
He still claims "that was a header" and that "he meant it". True story.

They believe I meant it on otib...


Title: Re: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: Benzel on Wednesday, February 11, 2015, 20:47:33
I hope you are all listening to what the wise man said.
Only fools rush in to the Town End during the warm up.


Title: Re: 'Chang - not funny' - Adver
Post by: Mother Brown on Wednesday, February 11, 2015, 23:01:44
Bring back the mesh fencing behind the goal . .  ala early 80"s style.


Title: Re: 'STFC to face court over unpaid rent' - Adver
Post by: wigglesworth on Thursday, February 12, 2015, 13:28:03
Pretty sure I saw a ball hit a coffee out of the hand of a fan behind the goal, many years ago.

Arsenal loanee Jo Kuffour purposely did this back in the Ruddock(?) era pre match. A Town end regular was making his routine trip back to right hand side of town end carrying cardboard tray full of chips coffees burgers the lot. Joker Jo couldn't resist it the little shit and nailed it full whack bang on from 20yds out as the town fan passed the left hand side of the goal. Everything went flying, the coffee soaked bloke went mental, Kuffour went to Torquay. Still see that guy making the same trip on matchdays, fully laden with warming treats, guess he knows he's statistically safe from it ever happening again now.  :I'm a complete mofleakin Deak