Thetownend.com

25% => Players => Topic started by: Matt71 on Thursday, October 9, 2014, 08:13:02



Title: Nathan Thompson
Post by: Matt71 on Thursday, October 9, 2014, 08:13:02
Signed a new long term deal today apparently which is good news ,now we need  Fods and Byrne signed up.


Title: Re: Nathen Thompson
Post by: Tails on Thursday, October 9, 2014, 08:14:30
Hopefully Nathan Thompson signs one as well!


Title: Re: Nathan Thompson
Post by: Red Frog on Thursday, October 9, 2014, 08:17:58
Hopefully Nathan Thompson signs one as well!

 :hmmm:


Title: Re: Nathan Thompson
Post by: Matt71 on Thursday, October 9, 2014, 08:21:39
:hmmm:
[/q



My I pad spelt nathan with an e now corrected due to Tails vigilance.


Title: Re: Nathan Thompson
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, October 9, 2014, 08:23:59
:hmmm:

We're all Nathan Thompson


Title: Re: Nathan Thompson
Post by: Red Frog on Thursday, October 9, 2014, 08:24:07
:hmmm:
[/q



My I pad spelt nathan with an e now corrected due to Tails vigilance.

Oh. Only the quoting thing to sort out now then.


Title: Re: Nathan Thompson
Post by: Matt71 on Thursday, October 9, 2014, 08:25:43
Yes working on that.


Title: Re: Nathan Thompson
Post by: suttonred on Thursday, October 9, 2014, 08:26:29
The grammer police are awake ;)


Title: Re: Nathan Thompson
Post by: JayBox325 on Thursday, October 9, 2014, 08:26:45
He's with us until 2017!


Title: Re: Nathan Thompson
Post by: Red Frog on Thursday, October 9, 2014, 08:30:41
The grammer police are awake ;)

That was intentional right?


Title: Re: Nathan Thompson
Post by: Sir Pissalot on Thursday, October 9, 2014, 08:34:49
That was intentional right?

There should be a comma after "intentional".   ;D


Title: Re: Nathan Thompson
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, October 9, 2014, 09:28:56
There should be a comma after "intentional".   ;D

Like this... intentional (http://www.thisisnorthumberland.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/comma_butterfly.jpg)


Title: Re: Nathan Thompson
Post by: Sir Pissalot on Thursday, October 9, 2014, 09:41:03
No, Reg.  That one requires a capital "C".  Shame on you!   :D


Title: Re: Nathan Thompson
Post by: suttonred on Thursday, October 9, 2014, 09:42:09
That was intentional right?

Maybe, maybee not...


Title: Re: Nathan Thompson
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, October 9, 2014, 09:53:24
No, Reg.  That one requires a capital "C".  Shame on you!   :D

I'll need some persuading that an indefinite article butterfly, isn't happy enough with a lower case first letter.


Title: Re: Nathan Thompson
Post by: Sir Pissalot on Thursday, October 9, 2014, 10:22:57
I stand corrected, Reg.  Shame on me!   :(