Thetownend.com

80% => The Nevillew General Discussion Forum => Topic started by: Flashheart on Wednesday, April 16, 2014, 20:39:58



Title: Funbags
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, April 16, 2014, 20:39:58
It's only right that we should honour the TEF's reputation as a bastion of high-brow, thought provoking and intellectual discourse. With that in mind it's about time that we got into one of the more profound matters that mankind has to face on a day to day basis..... Boobs.

Or more to the point, how do you like them?

I'm definitely a 'not big, not small. Just jubbly' man myself and will definitely prefer to steer clear of the more extreme ends of the scale.

Get voting.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: @mwooly63 on Wednesday, April 16, 2014, 20:41:48
Big and bouncy for me,
Am a right sucker for huge melons
Hmmmmm


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: ibelieveinmrreeves on Wednesday, April 16, 2014, 20:43:27
Big and bouncy. I think there is such a thing as "too big" in this regard.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Abrahammer on Wednesday, April 16, 2014, 20:53:24
I think we need photographic evidence of each category just so we are clear on the criteria.

Shuddering at remembering my only experience of bird with fried eggs, it just felt wrong


Title: Re:
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, April 16, 2014, 20:57:44
Not bothered, as long as they are not pancakes and can be sucked/fondled.

More of a leg man.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, April 16, 2014, 20:59:15
I think we need photographic evidence of each category just so we are clear on the criteria.



Fair point, but then the thread might have to be moved to NSFW

Best we just use our imagination.  :)


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Abrahammer on Wednesday, April 16, 2014, 21:02:43
Best we just use our imagination.  :)

That won't be an issue.............mmmmmmmmm boobies


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, April 16, 2014, 21:06:16
Somewhere between big & bouncy and just jubbly.



Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: @MacPhlea on Wednesday, April 16, 2014, 21:07:03
 
Fair point, but then the thread might have to be moved to NSFW

Best we just use our imagination.  :)

Jesus... NSFW? Don't think anyone has posted in that section of the forum for over 2 years... Either work has become more tolerant or we've become a bunch of lefty poofs :gay:

Oh and by the way natural, big and bouncy... None of this silicon shit


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Miles Mayhem on Wednesday, April 16, 2014, 21:08:56
Big and bouncy is a must. Small tits are just so boring


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Honkytonk on Wednesday, April 16, 2014, 22:01:00
A handful is the least you expect. Anything too big is simply ridiculous. All natural is much better than synthetic.

Personally, I'd say anything over 150% of grasping capacity is a waste.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Leggett on Wednesday, April 16, 2014, 22:10:54
mountainous. Natural, too. fuckin' love gert big tits!


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: THE FLASH on Wednesday, April 16, 2014, 22:20:13
Ass man me....

Had a bird with false tits......not good...jelly moulds..


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: jutty274 on Wednesday, April 16, 2014, 22:26:04
Small tits are just so boring
I had a bird with small tits & she made up for it in a lot of other ways, nice ass & would try anything.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Not that Nice If I'm Honest on Wednesday, April 16, 2014, 22:26:14
Back to school on Tuesday boys


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Honkytonk on Wednesday, April 16, 2014, 22:26:33
Ass man me....

Had a bird with false tits......not good...jelly moulds..

I think we need an arse thread Flashheart.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Barry Scott on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 00:48:52
None of the above, not really bothered at all. As long as they're not plastic that is.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: kerry red on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 04:11:55
Bollocks to tits.

It's much better way down south


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 04:49:44
I've never seen what's so attractive about a pair of legs or an arse.

Tits all the way.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 07:06:30
I've never seen what's so attractive about a pair of legs or an arse.

Tits all the way.

Really?? Are you sure???

(http://www.windsorstar.com/entertainment/cms/binary/5874799.jpg?size=640x420)


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Peter Venkman on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 07:18:13
Really?? Are you sure???

(http://www.windsorstar.com/entertainment/cms/binary/5874799.jpg?size=640x420)

Yes but that....or this?

(http://www.pbh2.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/leanna-decker.gif)

No contest for me I am afraid.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Talk Talk on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 07:20:46
I am happy with a handful but for me it is not so much about size rather more nipples. I find a nice pair of cigar butts much more exciting.

Also, a pair of fried eggs are fine, the best sex I ever had was with a young lady with itsy bitsy titties. She couldn't get enough, we were at it three or four times a day. I felt like I spent all of my waking hours hanging out of her.


Title: Re:
Post by: herthab on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 07:33:38
Is it just me,  or does this thread come across as a bit pathetic?  I'm no Germaine Greer, but fuck me....


Title: Re:
Post by: Talk Talk on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 07:42:02
Is it just me,  or does this thread come across as a bit pathetic?  I'm no Germaine Greer, but fuck me....

Meh. Women definitely discuss men's arses and probably willies. They are no different.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Peter Venkman on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 08:02:06
Is it just me,  or does this thread come across as a bit pathetic?  I'm no Germaine Greer, but fuck me....
Yes but TBH 80% of posts on here are. :)


Title: Re:
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 08:25:40
Is it just me,  or does this thread come across as a bit pathetic?  I'm no Germaine Greer, but fuck me....

The objectification of woman, is a serious issue...which can lead to the abuse of women both in the home and the wider community.
 
It's estimated that 1 in 4 women in Britain experience domestic abuse, which can be defined as not only physical abuse but verbal, controlling behaviour etc.

Having said that I fucking love titties me....I'm with Bazza and Talk Talk, take what you find.....and it's how they give women pleasure that matters  :)


Title: Re: Re: Re:
Post by: Batch on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 08:27:07
  I'm no Germaine Greer, but fuck me....

Do you have fried eggs or jubblies?


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: 4D on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 08:30:49
Yes but TBH 80% of posters on here are. :)

Corrected  :)


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 08:48:40
Really?? Are you sure???

100%. That does nothing for me.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Bewster on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 09:11:23
100%. That does nothing for me.

Yet you spend some time at the weekends staring at Bennetts arse  ;D


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: kerry red on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 09:21:19
I bet half the TEFers have bigger tits than their partners.

Bunch of lard arses!


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 11:18:10
Small for me. Prefer quality (shape) to quantity (size).


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: mystical_goat on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 15:21:25
I used to think small (B and below) were okay, and then I went back to having a girlfriend with DD's and my philosophy changed. God, they're great. C minimum.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 17:15:41
100%. That does nothing for me.
I don't understand  ???


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 17:20:03
I don't understand  ???

What's not to understand?

Boobs > arse/legs.





Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Flashheart on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 17:20:56
100%. That does nothing for me.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v490/jamiethon/aston_zps9f091a0f.jpg) (http://smg.photobucket.com/user/jamiethon/media/aston_zps9f091a0f.jpg.html)

?


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 17:24:12
Could be a bloke in a wig for all I know. Not even a twitch.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Flashheart on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 17:44:47
Somebody should start a legs thread now, we might even cure Samdy.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 17:57:08
What's not to understand?

Boobs > arse/legs.





But you don't seem to be saying that, unless I misunderstand, you're saying that you don't even like arses/legs. That's what I'm not comprehending.

Just out of interest, my picture was definitely not a bloke.

Here 'he' is from the front...

(http://thunderbird37.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/201306111370935497655560840.jpg)

Sofia Vergara - Something for everyone, I hope we can call agree. :nod:


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 18:17:26
But you don't seem to be saying that, unless I misunderstand, you're saying that you don't even like arses/legs. That's what I'm not comprehending.

I like them in the sense that they're an essential part of the human anatomy; women would look pretty odd without them. But to me there is nothing sexually attractive about them.


Title: Re: Re: Re: Funbags
Post by: Only Me on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 18:23:41
But you don't seem to be saying that, unless I misunderstand, you're saying that you don't even like arses/legs. That's what I'm not comprehending.

Just out of interest, my picture was definitely not a bloke.

Here 'he' is from the front...

(http://thunderbird37.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/201306111370935497655560840.jpg)

Sofia Vergara - Something for everyone, I hope we can call agree. :nod:
Agreed


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 18:53:05
I like them in the sense that they're an essential part of the human anatomy; women would look pretty odd without them. But to me there is nothing sexually attractive about them.

Wow  :jawdrop:


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 19:06:24
Do you find forearms sexually attractive? Or shoulder blades? Or feet?


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Flashheart on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 19:10:23
Shoulder blades can be very sexy.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 19:37:10
Do you find forearms sexually attractive? Or shoulder blades? Or feet?
On the right person, most definitely.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: tans on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 19:41:26
Perfection.

(http://i60.tinypic.com/vd3282.jpg)


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Empathy Sloth on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 19:45:47
Perfection.

(http://i60.tinypic.com/vd3282.jpg)
Dayum.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: tans on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 19:57:41
Not being down with the kids, i had to google what that meant 8)


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: kerry red on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 20:27:01
And you had to make me do it too!


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Simon Pieman on Thursday, April 17, 2014, 20:57:33
It's all about the overall shape and proportions of the woman's entire body. In some cases they may have smaller tits and in others bigger. As I general rule I prefer to grab a nice arse rather than a large pair of tits.

A nice looking boat is the most important thing.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Friday, April 18, 2014, 06:53:43
It's all about the overall shape and proportions of the woman's entire body. In some cases they may have smaller tits and in others bigger. As I general rule I prefer to grab a nice arse rather than a large pair of tits.

A nice looking boat is the most important thing.

Bove has got a nice boat


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Simon Pieman on Friday, April 18, 2014, 09:00:43
I don't think so John, but whatever floats your boat.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Oxfordhater on Friday, April 18, 2014, 09:43:29
Kelly Brook is the ultimate woman. Nice big natural tits.

I've smashed a couple of birds with fake tits in my time, truly disappointing experience.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Honkytonk on Friday, April 18, 2014, 09:47:22
I don't see what a woman's oarsmanship has to do with anything.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Talk Talk on Friday, April 18, 2014, 10:20:29
Perfection.

(http://i60.tinypic.com/vd3282.jpg)

Nah. She should be holding a pint of ale.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: kerry red on Friday, April 18, 2014, 10:25:04
I could think of something of mine she could be holding


Title: Re:
Post by: sonicyouth on Friday, April 18, 2014, 10:25:51
Your colostomy bag?


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Talk Talk on Friday, April 18, 2014, 10:26:16
I could think of something of mine she could be holding

Your Black and Decker jigsaw? Handy at DIY as well would be useful and even closer to perfection.


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: kerry red on Friday, April 18, 2014, 10:27:04
It's not black but it does rhyme with Decker!!


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Chubbs on Friday, April 18, 2014, 11:31:42
big but not so big they drop to the floor when they loose their support :-)
An ex of mine had huge melons which in a bra looked superb but when she took it off and lay on a bad they just flopped to the side and wasn't very pleasant.

My wife's are just perfect right now, given birth and breast feeding, they look amazing. Shame i can play with them :-(


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, April 18, 2014, 11:33:12
It's not black but it does rhyme with Decker!!

(http://i.imgur.com/S6Toq.gif)


Title: Re: Funbags
Post by: kerry red on Friday, April 18, 2014, 11:56:04
That's not far off!!