Thetownend.com

25% => Players => Topic started by: Flashheart on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:11:43



Title: Lee Homles
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:11:43
Signing on loan according to the beeb


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: tans on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:13:16
That will fuck the yellowbellies off.

Good signing.

Anyone know if he can play at wembley? As rooney is cuptied isnt he


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: [email protected] on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:13:55
I missed the last 5 seconds, but did Shaun Hodgetts say he WOULD be elligable to play in the JPT?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: LucienSanchez on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:15:51
Hahaha, seriously?! This is amusing... bit of competition for Rooney.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Benzel on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:20:08
chortle


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Devizes_Red on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:22:10
How many bloody wingers do we need?  What about Gabilondo!

I thought SH said that he CAN play at Wembley which I would assume that De Vita will now have to settle for a place on the bench.

I am not convinced by this signing, my initial thoughts are that he has been sent here by Oxford to spy on us and report back to Wilder!


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: stfctownenda on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:23:13
Hahaha, seriously?! This is amusing... bit of competition for Rooney.

Not just Rooney maybe this will be the kick up the backside for Ritchie to find some form, can't remember his last good game.  Lee Holmes is a cracking signing though and the fact it will wind up Oxford fans is even better hahaha!


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: RJack on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:23:49
If he's eligible for to play in JPT he will slot in nicely for Rooney who will be cup tied.  I really hope it's true he had a great spell at Swindon when he was a Derby Player & was Pox's key player to our derby day defeat as the Pox's shithole.



Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Benzel on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:25:39
Just in preparation for the announcement...

http://yellowsforum.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=oufcplayers&action=display&thread=7933&page=3


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: tans on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:27:14

I am not convinced by this signing, my initial thoughts are that he has been sent here by Oxford to spy on us and report back to Wilder!

You do know he isnt oxfords player right? Or are you on a wind up?

Gabilondos days are numbered imo


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:27:36
How many bloody wingers do we need?  What about Gabilondo!

I thought SH said that he CAN play at Wembley which I would assume that De Vita will now have to settle for a place on the bench.

I am not convinced by this signing, my initial thoughts are that he has been sent here by Oxford to spy on us and report back to Wilder!

[url width=604 height=453]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v490/jamiethon/serious.jpg[/url]


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Benzel on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:30:21
[url width=604 height=453]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v490/jamiethon/serious.jpg[/url]

Haha I was just looking for that pic.



Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: DRS on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:30:26
This is with one eye on next season.PDC is basically having a look at him now.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: LucienSanchez on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:31:33
Maybe Paolo just really wants to keep Oxford in L2, so having their best player on our bench would help make that happen


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:37:14
I am not sure I have heard of this Lee Homles sounds like some kind of a tramp :D

Lee Holmes is one classy player and will give the whole squad some competition, maybe Paolo sees him as a left back :o or just maybe it is just to piss off the Pox.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Devizes_Red on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:37:36
You do know he isnt oxfords player right? Or are you on a wind up?

Gabilondos days are numbered imo

Come on tans, I may be stupid but I am not quite as braindead as those lot up the A420.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: stfctownenda on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:38:19
http://www.thisisswindontownfc.co.uk/news/9588233.Swindon_expected_to_seal_Holmes_deal/


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: MarkyTee on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:38:35
Rated Holmes last time he was on loan here, great signing I reckon. The sweetner is the fact that only in the past few days, loads of Pox fans on twitter were debating how long he would increase his loan there for. UNLUCKY! :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: kaufman on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:38:58
Oxford manager said: “We’ve had a chat to Lee and he’s told us he doesn’t want to go unless it’s a real big club that comes in for him.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: tans on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:41:54
Come on tans, I may be stupid but I am not quite as braindead as those lot up the A420.

Sorry, thats me told!


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: MarkyTee on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:42:15
Just in preparation for the announcement...

http://yellowsforum.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=oufcplayers&action=display&thread=7933&page=3

Theyve found out....


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: ghanimah on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:42:53
Oxford manager said: “We’ve had a chat to Lee and he’s told us he doesn’t want to go unless it’s a real big club that comes in for him.

http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/sport/oxfordunited/9583280.Oxford_United_face_battle_to_keep_hold_of_star_Holmes/

 :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: MarkyTee on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:43:01
Oxford manager said: “We’ve had a chat to Lee and he’s told us he doesn’t want to go unless it’s a real big club that comes in for him.

 :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Ginginho on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:45:30
Great signing, and if it's in view to a permanent move (let's face it, he won't get a look in if Southampton get promoted to the Premier League, which looks very likely) and he can play in the JPT final, then even better.

Unless it is actually a player called Lee Homles, in which case, i've never heard of him.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Crispy on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:47:01
Even though he played for us first, once a yellowbelly..


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:49:01
Great signing, and if it's in view to a permanent move (let's face it, he won't get a look in if Southampton get promoted to the Premier League, which looks very likely) and he can play in the JPT final, then even better.

Unless it is actually a player called Lee Homles, in which case, i've never heard of him.

Oh yeah, ha ha.

I reckon homles had a latino ring to it.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Benzel on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:49:34
"If he leaves, it will be to a league 1 club. Whats the point in going to another league 2 club when hes Settled (ish) here."

Oh I don't know, another JPT Final appearance and a championship medal?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:51:16
How many league games do you have to play to get a championship medal? Are there enough left for him?

Still hilarious, he's left p*xford for a much bigger club hahahah


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: ghanimah on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:53:38
Quote
Just seen this myself, cant believe he is leaving us for Swindon.

 :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:




Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: tans on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:53:52
10 games i think jayo


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:55:59
He's a left winger right?

Which means his preferred position under Paolo would be in the right? (Although, there'd be no harm in playing him in the left either)


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 09:57:46
Brilliant on so many levels.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: tans on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:00:07
'Nice one wilder'

:D


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: RJack on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:04:33
Of course this could all turn in to a Lee holmes Wednesday :)


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Benzel on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:04:55
If he's here til the end of the season and makes an appearance in all but 1 game, he qualifies for a medal.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Bewster on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:10:38
You can hear the meltdown up the A420 already


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:12:05
This is just brilliant.

We don't exactly need another winger, but to poach him from under their nose is most enjoyable.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: kerry red on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:21:57
My favourite 'Yellow' comment so far:

'Our best chance in years for us to sign a class player'

Obviously doesn't rate their other players, then!!


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: stfctownenda on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:22:48
The idiots on there forum keep saying he has probably come here for more money! how is that possible on a loan contract? we can only pay what Southampton pay him and that will be the same as what Oxford paid him??


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Benzel on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:26:01
Well they make a point about him looking to his future... Could very well be with a view to a perm move?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: DRS on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:31:26
Exactly Benzel.I think Paolo has seen just how well Benson has profited from good crosses. With 1 eye on next season maybe he wants holmes to challenge instead of devita.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: kerry red on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:33:36
Exactly Benzel.I think Paolo has seen just how well Benson has profited from good crosses. With 1 eye on next season maybe he wants holmes to challenge instead of devita.

Or he knows Ritchie is off in the summer


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Bob's Orange on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:37:44
In Holmes, De Vita, Ritchie and Rooney we have 4 more than capable wingers.



Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Swindon Please Win on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:38:59
 :clap: Well Done Paolo and JW.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:40:24
I don't think that Ritchie will leave in the summer, he has stated publically that he is here to stay and that the cluba re going places with Paolo in charge.

I think it will be between Rooney and Holmes for the left wing spot with De Vita, Gabilondo and Easyjet moving on in the summer.

Holmes is one of the best crossers of the ball I have seen at this level and Benson could well thrive off his deliveries.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: tans on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:42:36
I reckon ritchie will be here start of next season and have another agreement like this season? Ie depending where we are in the league come xnas time


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: DRS on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:45:49
Yeah Merry Xnas. Thick cunt.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:46:25
I don't think that Ritchie will leave in the summer, he has stated publically that he is here to stay and that the cluba re going places with Paolo in charge.

I think it will be between Rooney and Holmes for the left wing spot with De Vita, Gabilondo and Easyjet moving on in the summer.

Holmes is one of the best crossers of the ball I have seen at this level and Benson could well thrive off his deliveries.

I reckon De Vita will stay. We could be a little short otherwise, he'd make very good cover.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:49:59
A great post on the Saints forum about Lee Holmes joining us.....

Quote
looks like lee has traded up clubs and gone to Oxfords arch rivals

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17364614


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: stfctownenda on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:53:35
I don't think that Ritchie will leave in the summer, he has stated publically that he is here to stay and that the cluba re going places with Paolo in charge.

I think it will be between Rooney and Holmes for the left wing spot with De Vita, Gabilondo and Easyjet moving on in the summer.

Holmes is one of the best crossers of the ball I have seen at this level and Benson could well thrive off his deliveries.

I hope Holmes is competition for both wings, if Ritchie continues to have no competition for his role in the side and is guarenteed 90 mins every week then I think he will struggle to find form again, it's too easy for him at the moment he is guarenteed to never be subbed despite how he is playing, in recent games Rooney has been better in some of the games and Ritchie has done very little and it has still been Rooney subbed.  Holmes needs to be pushing both wingers then hopefully we will be getting the best out of all 3 of them.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: london_red on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:54:22
I reckon De Vita will stay. We could be a little short otherwise, he'd make very good cover.

Feel for him a bit I like I do for Connell. Thought De Vita really grew into that LM role, and before Rooney arrived had been one of our most consistent performers for months. Hope there will still be a place for him in the squad next season.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: TheMajorSTFC on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:54:33
Of course this could all turn in to a Lee holmes Wednesday :)

Much better than Cuntstable Thursday!

Would be a great signing IMO, Welcome 'Holmes' Lee*  :D (*provided it goes through of course)


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Benzel on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:56:34
Feel for him a bit I like I do for Connell. Thought De Vita really grew into that LM role, and before Rooney arrived had been one of our most consistent performers for months. Hope there will still be a place for him in the squad next season.

I wouldn't want to see Rafa move on but he's not an out and out winger in the way Ritchie, Rooney and Holmes are. Rafa works bloody hard and is great at helping out his full back but we're spending more time going forwards than back, so having more direct, conventional wingers is a must.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: DMR on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:57:13
Anyone else slightly suprised he's still plying his trade at this level?

I thought he was fucking outstanding when we had him as a young pup. Remember the whole ground singing "sign him up" after his last game and he was clearly moved by it.

Very good signing.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: fittons_coaching_badge on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 10:59:26
I'm slightly disappointed in the Oxford fans reaction on the yellow forum .....

I was hoping for a Constable style melt down!  >:(


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Bogus Dave on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:00:06
He's been brilliant whenever he's played against us since, whether for walsall, southampton or oxford. It is odd he's down here, unless he only turns it on against us


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: ghanimah on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:03:23
I'm slightly disappointed in the Oxford fans reaction on the yellow forum .....

I was hoping for a Constable style melt down!  >:(

Agreed, they've turned all reasonable, what's going on?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: SuggWillSugg MBE on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:04:16
Maybe the've finally begun to realise we are simply a bigger club than them.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: kerry red on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:04:42
So it must be PdC's preferred method of signing players - play well against us and he signs them!

Hope we can afford Crewe's Nick Powell - he looks a right gem


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Bewster on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:05:03
So it must be PdC's preferred method of signing players - play well against us and he signs them!

Hope we can afford Crewe's Nick Powell - he looks a right gem

And Pack


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Swindon Please Win on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:05:34
http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/9285244.Connolly_and_Holmes_yet_to_sign_new_deals/

Found this link, Maybe looking into to a free signing in the summer?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: SuggWillSugg MBE on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:08:39
To get him on a free signing at the end of the season would be one hell of a signing!


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Benzel on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:11:28
It'd be freaking awesome. He'll probably go to Huddersfield.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Ardiles on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:15:21
Let's not get too excited.  He's putting himself in the shop window in order to get the best deal for himself in the summer.  That deal could come from anywhere.  He's just figured that our shop window (PDC, Wembley appearance, potential Champions) is a more visible than Oxford's at the moment.

There's a chance he could sign, of course.  But that would depend on both parties (Holmes & STFC) impressing each other.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: hobnob on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:16:32
Genius signing on so many levels, welcome back Lee (we will overlook your time at the scum as you have come to your senses now)!

 :clap:


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Swindon Please Win on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:21:03
Lee Holmes loan deal looks to be with a view to a permanent switch at the end of the season.

From Gary Rose.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Ginginho on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:22:34
Great stuff.

As long as he's not Ritchie's replacement?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: kerry red on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:24:22
Agreed, they've turned all reasonable, what's going on?

Oh, I don't know - it's getting cranked up a bit now


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Processed Beats on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:25:59
Absolutely brilliant.

Loved him when he was here last time and he had an absolute blinder against us for the scum. Genius move by Paolo.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: SuggWillSugg MBE on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:27:55
Quote


holmes going to the scum is another harsh wake up call of excactly where we stand.


It appears they do seem to be realising their rightful place at last.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Swindon Please Win on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:32:37
Quote
robin you are a total nonse, boring old ****. hey if he has joined you he wouldnt get a league winners medal as would have played enough games for you before the end off the season, so statement was wrong, as for saying your league champions premiture i think as are you if you win the league then you would have paid won it fair and square although you would have won it by paying your way to win league as for our players not being disaplined umm look at your manger before you start on other teams he is like a spoilt kid spitting his dummy out ,he will be sent off more times than any of our individual players in our team just remember holmes is on loan to you not perminant as was to us, constanble has more pride and would never leave us for our rivals as for holmes has no loyalties so fair play to him hope he does well and goes to a big club although wont be you after the seasons finished , your small fish mackral comes to mind stinky fish good look for the season long way to go yet so dont count your chichens yet. just concentrait wot your doing in the league not wot were doing oxford is all i concentrate on and thats all our players concentrate . i surgest you start writing on your local rag not ours tc idiot

My favourite  :clap: from the Poxford mail site.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Bob's Orange on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:33:38
Hairydean on these comments sounds like a diverse interesting sort of character?

http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/sport/9588639.Holmes_snubs_Oxford_United_for_Swindon_loan/

Oh and can someone correct the spelling of Holmes on the thread title?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Ginginho on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:34:39
Oh and can someone correct the spelling of Holmes on the thread title?

Thank you, it's bugging me too.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Swindon Please Win on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:34:52
Hairydean on these comments sounds like a diverse interesting sort of character?

http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/sport/9588639.Holmes_snubs_Oxford_United_for_Swindon_loan/

Oh and can someone correct the spelling of Holmes on the thread title?

Brilliant, isn't it, just quoted it above.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:37:52
Thank you, it's bugging me too.

I like it


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: ghanimah on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:38:28
My favourite  :clap: from the Poxford mail site.

I had to mentally correct so many spelling and grammatical errors in his post, I was tempted to send him an invoice for my efforts.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Benzel on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:43:41
So when are we signing Pack and Jombati?

Anyone else played especially well against us this season?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:45:16
So when are we signing Pack and Jombati?

Anyone else played especially well against us this season?

That Shrews (?) striker PDC was hugging after the match?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: jimmy_onions on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:46:44
Some of the coups this season have been splendid, I can think of about three chelt players that could serve as well....


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Ash Brake Red on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:47:21
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17364614

nothing yet on stfc website to confirm deal


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Ginginho on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:48:20
Some of the coups this season have been splendid, I can think of about three chelt players that could serve as well....

Jombati, Pack and who else?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Ginginho on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:49:33
Hairydean on these comments sounds like a diverse interesting sort of character?

http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/sport/9588639.Holmes_snubs_Oxford_United_for_Swindon_loan/

Just reading that in my head I almost ended up out of breath.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:49:37
Jombati, Pack and who else?
Duffy? ;)


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Bogus Dave on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:50:10
Shrewsbury left back was decent


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Benzel on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:51:06
Yeah Jacobson and Jombati are the only to LBs that I can think of who've done a job on Ritchie by themselves.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: jimmy_onions on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:51:17
Jombati, Pack and who else?

the right back, had rooney well under control I thought...


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: jimmy_onions on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:51:44
the right back, had rooney well under control I thought...

oh and perhaps McClashen (sp, not a clue)...apart from that would giuve us about 12 wingers..


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: LucienSanchez on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:54:06
Duffy? ;)

As much as he was irritating, i thought Duffy had something about him... like a slightly more dangerous Connell, he did well up top on his own.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Trashbat? on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:54:51
That Shrews (?) striker PDC was hugging after the match?

James Collins


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Bob's Orange on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:55:37
I had to mentally correct so many spelling and grammatical errors in his post, I was tempted to send him an invoice for my efforts.

That's partly why I want Homles corrected as it looks retarded.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Swindon Please Win on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:55:50
Thought the Shrews left back was good aswell, kept Ritchie is his pocket. When he went off injured that changed the game for me and we won.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Batch on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:55:51
Can he play full back? We have 6 winger now!



Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:56:25
Embrace the Homles


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Bob's Orange on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:56:43
I said in another thread that Pack and Peter Leven could probably do a good job in Division 3.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: DRS on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 12:01:40
Don't care how many wingers we got.When a better player becomes available then you have to get him.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: kerry red on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 12:08:20
Perhaps Homles is boosting his wages by selling The Big Issue


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 12:15:27
Apparently according to the Pox forums he was never that good in the first place, over rated, and that they have better players already at the club :D


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: gingernuggets on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 12:17:06
Thought the Shrews left back was good aswell, kept Ritchie is his pocket. When he went off injured that changed the game for me and we won.

Joe Jacobson I think. Shrews fans rate him very highly.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: kaufman on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 12:19:02
"We wish Lee well in going forward and we know that one of the clubs he is potentially going to have talked to him about a contract for the next couple of years as well so I understand it from Lee's point of view, as his contract is up in the summer and we would not be in a position to offer him a contract at that sort of level."

Here's hoping

and this from Gary Rose on twitter

Lee Holmes loan deal looks to be with a view to a permanent switch at the end of the season


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: ronnie21 on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 12:19:57
Hairydean on these comments sounds like a diverse interesting sort of character?

http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/sport/9588639.Holmes_snubs_Oxford_United_for_Swindon_loan/

Oh and can someone correct the spelling of Holmes on the thread title?
Don't expect too much from the inbreds down the road at Oxford Bob, he's probably shining his webbed feet as we speak!


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 12:29:39
Holmes has always played well against us since he left here. He mullered us the other year at Walsall and then did a number on Caddis a few weeks back at The Kassam and got the assists to both goals. Goosd signing for this level and what's even better is how much it will piss the scum off.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Freddies Ferret on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 12:30:18
Rooney up front maybe?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 12:30:21
Some of the tweets from the Pox are priceless


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 12:32:19
Quote
Un fucking believable! Swindon truly are a bunch of scummy cunts!!! Lee Holmes, your a prick aswell!

 ;D


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Boner on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 12:34:15
Perhaps Homles is boosting his wages by selling The Big Issue

 :clap:


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: kerry red on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 12:36:33
Any of their delightful fuckers wish he crashes his car and dies yet? Or threatened to go round his house to sort him out?
A la Cunstable.

They are truly charmless goons


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: RJack on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 12:38:22
I'd like to know Eric Reads views on this  :)


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: MarkyTee on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 12:41:40
I'd like to know Eric Reads views on this  :)

Hed probably bang on about how players wouldnt dare leave Pox in the 70s and 80s for fear of being bummed by Eric and his mob. Rumour has it thats why Cuntstubble stayed...Erics boys got to him.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 12:47:29
Hed probably bang on about how players wouldnt dare leave Pox in the 70s and 80s for fear of being bummed by Eric and his mob. Rumour has it thats why Cuntstubble stayed...Erics boys got to him.

Eric's boys didn't need to get to him. The fear alone was enough.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: 4D on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 12:50:35
Apparently according to the Pox forums he was never that good in the first place, over rated, and that they have better players already at the club :D

That must be why they're top of the league......Oh wait!


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Ginginho on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 12:53:35
Eric's boys didn't need to get to him. The fear alone was enough.

Eric is Keyser Soze.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: reeves4england on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 12:57:18
@luke_oufc94
Quote
Lee Holmes you're a fucking wanker! Coming down from Southampton to play football and you go to our rivals? #Dick

@conradmynes
Quote
"This stinks of the Oxford board not wantin promotion cos they no they'll have 2 dig deep in their pockets nex seaon in div 1! Shame Thomas!!

As a slight aside, I find it very hard to take anybody who has both the initials of their club AND their year of birth in their username. Especially when it's 1994!


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: reeves4england on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 13:01:34
Oh, and seeing as nobody had done it, I've taken the liberty of making the following edition to his Wiki page...

Quote
Lee Daniel Holmes (born 2 April 1987) is an English footballer who plays for Oxford United Swindon Town on loan from Southampton

That felt good :)


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: kerry red on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 13:05:45
Any of their delightful fuckers wish he crashes his car and dies yet? Or threatened to go round his house to sort him out?
A la Cunstable.

They are truly charmless goons

Looks like I spoke too soon. One fuckwit on the Oxford Mail site wishes 'he breaks his legs'.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Victor Mildew on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 13:07:36
Agreed, they've turned all reasonable, what's going on?

just shows that beating us is all they care about! not about promotion and winning things.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: juddie on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 13:08:35
Brilliant on so many levels.

this


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: kerry red on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 13:11:19
It's getting better over there. They are now suggesting that all Yellowbellies cancel their Betfair accounts cos that's where we get our money from!

Priceless - how on earth will Betfair carry on without all their pocket money  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Ginginho on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 13:18:24
It's getting better over there. They are now suggesting that all Yellowbellies cancel their Betfair accounts cos that's where we get our money from!

Priceless - how on earth will Betfair carry on without all their pocket money  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:

They're a whole new kind of special, aren't they?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 13:22:11
It is as funny as fuck, any of our rivals players that play well against us, we sign a few weeks later. Chelts must be worried as fuck :)


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Costanza on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 13:27:08
Has he turned us down yet?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: MarkyTee on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 13:28:44
@luke_oufc94
@conradmynes
As a slight aside, I find it very hard to take anybody who has both the initials of their club AND their year of birth in their username. Especially when it's 1994!

I also like Pox's grasp of geography...'He came down from Southampton to play for us' - Last time i looked on a map Poxford wasnt in the solent....wish it was though.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 13:31:37
[reg]Matt Ritchies replacement for next season[/reg]


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: ghanimah on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 13:32:20
It's getting better over there. They are now suggesting that all Yellowbellies cancel their Betfair accounts cos that's where we get our money from!

Priceless - how on earth will Betfair carry on without all their pocket money  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:

 :D Dearie me, a meltdown that makes Harrisburg look distinctly like a side show



Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: fittons_coaching_badge on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 13:35:17
I have a question .....

We must have a squad of over 30 players now?  How can we possibly be within that 60% salary cap?

I am guessing there must be ways around it, maybe with the owners putting money in as sponsership.

I was just wondering ....


Title: Re: Re: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Frigby Daser on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 13:36:48
It is as funny as fuck, any of our rivals players that play well against us, we sign a few weeks later. Chelts must be worried as fuck :)

We are developing a very nice theme of signing players who play well against us: Rooney, Holmes...tried Constable. Hopefully Pack is next. I won't hold my breath on that one - he can go onto big things.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: jutty274 on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 13:39:56
According to the scum forum it's a signed deal for Pack coming to us next year.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Bob's Orange on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 13:42:13
Not sure I quite understand what this poster is banging on about?

Agree. He might have them top of the league and geared for promotion, but there's so many questions that go deeper than that with PDC. The influx of foreign superstars and their subsequent departures/cancelled contracts, the dealing of Medhi Kerrouche, the countless touchline bans and this bitter, dog-with-a-bone obsession to endear himself to the natives by getting one over on Oxford. He can't seem to manage it on the pitch, so he'll do it off it - by outbidding us for a player Swindon quite frankly don't need.

Losing Holmes is a real shame as he had evident talent and has clearly left for more money. You could see he enjoyed his football here and his celebrations during the Swindon game left me wondering whether we could keep him longer. No shame in being outbid by Swindon - I just hope the familiar mantra of 'financial irregularities' crops up sooner rather than later in Wiltshire in the not-too-distant future.

Read more: http://www.yellowsforum.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=oufcplayers&action=display&thread=7933&page=5#ixzz1p69dsLqk

He really should have stopped after this sentance - 'He might have them top of the league and geared for promotion, but there's so many questions that go deeper than that with PDC'

I hate to come across as obsessed with them, but they really do have some special people over there!


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 13:52:21
He's a loan player for fuck sake - how can we even offer him more money. Surely no matter where he plays on loan and for who he will still get the same wages Southampton pay him every week.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Ardiles on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 13:55:34
Now that PDC has made a good start with us, contrary to the hopes & expectations of many fans from elsewhere, and now that we're top of this league and looking good for promotion - our detractors are having to resort to the only argument left to them: that the title push has been funded from unsustainable sources and that we are storing up trouble for the future.

All of this conjecture is unsubstantiated, and runs contrary to Nick Watkins' comments from yesterday concerning the ease with which the bottom line has held up this year despite operating in Division Four.  The truth is, we don't know...but neither do the fans of Oxford or any other club.  We will find out, for sure, when the club's next set of financial statements are produced.

Of course, the cup runs and impending Wembley appearance will have boosted revenues this year, but this is never mentioned by the conspiracy theorists who have convinced themselves that it's all about to blow up.  Neither is it ever explained how players who have been signed from York City, Grimsby and Alfreton are going to be on £5,000 or £6,000 per week.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: kerry red on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 13:56:41
To be fair, it is understandable. They know - but hate admitting- that we have the look of a club not only getting promoted this season, but could well go on again next season.

Their only crumb of comfort is that somehow we have got some 'nasties' hiding in the shadows that will eventually be exposed sending tus umbling back from whence we came.

They come over all holier than thou re how the respective clubs are run financially without ever admitting that they have no option other than to run their club on a shoestring.

To that extent they are no different to the vast majority of clubs in League 2 - no money and searching for players in the bargain bucket and just hoping a winning formula magically appears (bit like Cheltenham I suppose).

But the problem for all such similar clubs is that if they ever do get promoted their best players will get cherry picked and they will end up as before (bit like Wycombe I suppose) bouncing between Leagues 1 and 2.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 14:00:25
Now that PDC has made a good start with us, contrary to the hopes & expectations of many fans from elsewhere, and now that we're top of this league and looking good for promotion - our detractors are having to resort to the only argument left to them: that the title push has been funded from unsustainable sources and that we are storing up trouble for the future.

All of this conjecture is unsubstantiated, and runs contrary to Nick Watkins' comments from yesterday concerning the ease with which the bottom line has held up this year despite operating in Division Four.  The truth is, we don't know...but neither do the fans of Oxford or any other club.  We will find out, for sure, when the club's next set of financial statements are produced.

Of course, the cup runs and impending Wembley appearance will have boosted revenues this year, but this is never mentioned by the conspiracy theorists who have convinced themselves that it's all about to blow up.  Neither is it ever explained how players who have been signed from York City, Grimsby and Alfreton are going to be on £5,000 or £6,000 per week.

Top post.

Its probably better financially to be at the top of a league rather than the bottom of another even if the league you are top of, is below the other one - if that makes sense.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: ghanimah on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 14:04:37
Not sure I quite understand what this poster is banging on about?

Agree. He might have them top of the league and geared for promotion, but there's so many questions that go deeper than that with PDC. The influx of foreign superstars and their subsequent departures/cancelled contracts, the dealing of Medhi Kerrouche, the countless touchline bans and this bitter, dog-with-a-bone obsession to endear himself to the natives by getting one over on Oxford. He can't seem to manage it on the pitch, so he'll do it off it - by outbidding us for a player Swindon quite frankly don't need.

Losing Holmes is a real shame as he had evident talent and has clearly left for more money. You could see he enjoyed his football here and his celebrations during the Swindon game left me wondering whether we could keep him longer. No shame in being outbid by Swindon - I just hope the familiar mantra of 'financial irregularities' crops up sooner rather than later in Wiltshire in the not-too-distant future.

Read more: http://www.yellowsforum.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=oufcplayers&action=display&thread=7933&page=5#ixzz1p69dsLqk

He really should have stopped after this sentance - 'He might have them top of the league and geared for promotion, but there's so many questions that go deeper than that with PDC'

I hate to come across as obsessed with them, but they really do have some special people over there!

Presumably he can't understand league tables?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Costanza on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 14:18:29
He's referring to Di Canio's failure to beat Oxford which is sadly a valid point.

Football Forums: Where everybody is an expert on every football club.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: 4D on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 14:19:37
I also like Pox's grasp of geography...'He came down from Southampton to play for us' - Last time i looked on a map Poxford wasnt in the solent....wish it was though.

Antarctica would be better.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Bob's Orange on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 15:04:50
He's referring to Di Canio's failure to beat Oxford which is sadly a valid point.

Football Forums: Where everybody is an expert on every football club.

It might be a valid point. But at the start of the season, do you think PDC pre-season objectives were to beat Oxford or get us promoted?

At the end of the day we have lost to them twice, but top the league by a large margin. They really are clinging on to flimsy glories in a futile attempt of oneupmanship.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Costanza on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 15:09:00
Ah who cares, it'll be amusing if he signs.

Has it happened yet? Are we pressing F5 frantically yet?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: MarkyTee on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 15:19:42
Antarctica would be better.

Dont eat the yellow snow


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: PHIL!!!! on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 16:19:35
Haaaa wicked cool!

Always rated Holmes, so am glad to see him back. Hopefully he's over the worst of his injuries. Certainly seems that way anyway, so fingers crossed!

Some team we're putting together - Exciting times


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Langers on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 16:21:31
Fantastic work by PDC.

Would be fantastic if we got him on a perm in the summer.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Gnasher on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 16:29:09
Would be an excellent signing. Can't get 'Ritchie replacement' out of my head though.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Ginginho on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 16:34:04
Would be an excellent signing. Can't get 'Ritchie replacement' out of my head though.

How does that go?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Gnasher on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 16:37:51
How does that go?

It's a Kylie song


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Ginginho on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 16:38:27
Ah, I know it.

La la la, la la la la laaa, la la la, la la la la laaa


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Gnasher on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 16:39:18
Ah, I know it.

La la la, la la la la laaa, la la la, la la la la laaa

That's the one  :)


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Bob's Orange on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 16:39:48
Still nothing official.

Are we waiting until tomorrow for Holmes Thursday?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Ardiles on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 16:39:52
Would be an excellent signing. Can't get 'Ritchie replacement' out of my head though.

Even if we do go up, it should come as no surprise to anyone if Matt decided to move in the summer.  There will be a host (probably) of Championship level clubs bidding for his services, all of which (probably) will be able to offer him better terms than us.  I'm sure he does love it here, but he has his own future and career aspirations to think of as well.  I'd love him to stay - but if he doesn't, we'll replace and move forward...as we have on many occasions before.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: MarkyTee on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 16:42:56
Even if we do go up, it should come as no surprise to anyone if Matt decided to move in the summer.  There will be a host (probably) of Championship level clubs bidding for his services, all of which (probably) will be able to offer him better terms than us.  I'm sure he does love it here, but he has his own future and career aspirations to think of as well.  I'd love him to stay - but if he doesn't, we'll replace and move forward...as we have on many occasions before.

Well said.

Or We could go into meltdown and threaten to burn players hosues down or attack their families, whilst also retorting 'I dont care, *insert players name* is shit anyway, good riddance'. Ive seen that happen at other clubs before  ;)



Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: tans on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 16:43:36
Yeah ritchies fucking crap, never rated him


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: MarkyTee on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 16:45:48
Yeah ritchies fucking crap, never rated him

Exactly like that, thats the spirit!


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: TheDukeOfBanbury on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 16:49:24
Just confirms we are a bigger club and confirms that well known FACT "Forever in our shadow"

I like this signing in more ways than one.

Meltdown - but I am sticking to my guns. Will never enter the Pox forum again not even just reading it.
Therefore the comments pasted here are more than welcome  :)



Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Benzel on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 16:52:56
So.... it's still no official then?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: juddie on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 16:57:20
If Ritchie leaves this summer for a lot of money after helping us out of this shithole division and we sign Holmes as his replacement, I'd say that was decent business.

Ritchie will have stayed and done his bit where others left us, so fair play. His talents are destined for a brighter stage (Championship I'd say).

Don't get me wrong if he stays and we signed Holmes I'd be delighted, but it would be good business otherwise. This squad will need strengthening and if we were to get a mill+ for ritchie, and sign Lee Holmes, then I wouldn't lose any sleep.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: herthab on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 16:57:57
Even if we do go up, it should come as no surprise to anyone if Matt decided to move in the summer. There will be a host (probably) of Championship level clubs bidding for his services, all of which (probably) will be able to offer him better terms than us.  I'm sure he does love it here, but he has his own future and career aspirations to think of as well.  I'd love him to stay - but if he doesn't, we'll replace and move forward...as we have on many occasions before.

Not too sure about that. He was arguably at his best for us in the first half of the season yet the only club that made a bid in January were Bournemouth.
I think he's been great for us this season and will probably be decent in League 1 next season, but The Championship may well be a step too far.

I know it's difficult sometimes, when your team is doing as well as we are, but we need to remember we are playing against League 2 sides and that's who Ritchie et al are shining against.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: MarkyTee on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 16:58:39
Quote
As far as I am concerned he has screwed us. His Yellow player interview shows him saying how much he wants to stay and see us go up and then he does this. I don't care what his reasons are; I now absolutely despise him.

There you go  ;D


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: juddie on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:01:12
I know it's difficult sometimes, when your team is doing as well as we are, but we need to remember we are playing against League 2 sides and that's who Ritchie et al are shining against.


Agreed, but Huddersfield, Wigan, Brizzle Shitty etc etc. There's no doubt in my mind Ritchie and Caddis could play in the Championship.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: TheDukeOfBanbury on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:02:09
It might be a valid point. But at the start of the season, do you think PDC pre-season objectives were to beat Oxford or get us promoted?

At the end of the day we have lost to them twice, but top the league by a large margin. They really are clinging on to flimsy glories in a futile attempt of oneupmanship.


Spot on. Losing against Oxford hurt but this will be forgotten about if we go up and have another decent season next year...........Just gets better and better.




Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Costanza on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:02:13
There you go  ;D

Recent history suggets that Oxford fans don't like waiting to see if a player actually chooses Swindon over Oxford.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:02:28
Quote from: Benzel l ink=topic=47362.msg1056732#msg1056732 date=1331743976
So.... it's still no official then?

I am led to believe he's been at the club today and met the players.

Not that, that is official or concrete proof.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: TheDukeOfBanbury on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:05:17
I am led to believe he's been at the club today and met the players.

Not that, that is official or concrete proof.

Scarf above the head or a shirt :)


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: herthab on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:06:39
Agreed, but Huddersfield, Wigan, Brizzle Shitty etc etc. There's no doubt in my mind Ritchie and Caddis could play in the Championship.

How many times do lower league players excel against higher placed opposition in cup competitions? One off games are exactly that. Doing it at a higher level consistently is a different matter.

I'd agree with you about Caddis though, out of all our players, I'd say that he has the best chance of playing at Championship level/higher regularly and successfully (Possibly Bodin but too soon to tell).


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Processed Beats on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:10:31
Just confirmed by the club's Twitter feed.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Processed Beats on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:10:55
http://www.swindontownfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10341~2658087,00.html


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Costanza on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:12:29
Scarf above the head or a shirt :)

DV saw him in the gym.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: @MacPhlea on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:13:04
official...


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: juddie on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:13:53
How many times do lower league players excel against higher placed opposition in cup competitions?


Our players? not very often!


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: herthab on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:20:07
Our players? not very often!

Good point well made.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Costanza on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:20:56
I look forward to the OF defence later this evening.

The highlight of this transfer is Chris Wilder's 'only leave for a bigger club' comment.

Welcome back Holmes.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: juddie on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:21:13
Scarf above the head or a shirt :)

like this?
https://twitter.com/#!/Official_STFC/status/179979810028789760/photo/1


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: juddie on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:22:40
Bet that link doesn't work. I'm a rimpiece.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:23:35
Social media sites put a "/#!" in the link. Remove that part and it works.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Shaw Rosso on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:25:23
Fantastic signing really, well done PDC/JW for making it happen, behind closed doors  :clap:

One oik off the Scum board sums it up beautifully.....

We are doomed!!!
We are not going up anyway we are not good enough end of  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:

Lets re-build again and again and again and again and gain
lets gets stability again again again again
blah blah blah blah blah


 :suicide:



Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: TheMajorSTFC on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:25:37
The highlight of this transfer is Chris Wilder's 'only leave for a bigger club' comment.

Welcome back Holmes.

This.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:26:15
DV saw him in the gym.

I didnt but I saw a man who had seen him!


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: juddie on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:28:41
I didnt but I saw a man who had seen him!

conclusive.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:30:24
conclusive enough for me at the time!

all official now, even better.

cant believe 8 years after being here before he's playing in L2.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Swindon Please Win on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 17:49:39
Do Oxford fans know we are paying more wages for Holmes? Don't they realise we are in a better position as a club and our club is more attractive to players?



Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 18:07:01
Men who see men who have seen other men in the gym.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 18:15:06
wrong thread?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: ronnie21 on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 18:28:54
Unless Rooney or Ritchie are carrying an injury that we don't know about I don't really see the logic behind this signing - as welcome as it is!!  Would have liked a more defensive signing, but there is no doubt PDC is going for it - another attacking option!!


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 18:30:56
Was it really 8 years ago he was here? Jesus, time flies.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: DiV on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 18:31:54
December 2004 I believe as 17 year old.

So not 8 years exactly but 8 years - you know what I mean.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: DRS on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 18:40:06
To be fair Rooney hasn't been here long and is already being rested so i suspect his fitness is an issue at the moment.Also being honest DeVita hasn't done much since november either so i do see the logic


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 18:44:31
Ritchie must be overdue a rest as well


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: corner on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 18:49:52
To be fair Rooney hasn't been here long and is already being rested so i suspect his fitness is an issue at the moment.Also being honest DeVita hasn't done much since november either so i do see the logic
I was expecting more from DeVita, his first few months he looked good and i thought he would get even better but as you say he hasnt really done much since november....


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 18:52:11
Well I certainly didn't see that one coming ???

I haven't trawled through the whole thread and I dare say the point has already been made but...is this paving the way for Ritchie to move on in the summer? Possibly to Southampton in a cash plus player (Lee Holmes obviously) deal? It would make sense to get him in now and get him used to the system, training methods etc and a full pre-season and then he hits the ground running next season. I have to say, I can't think of a better replacement.

And let's face it, no team at our level can really accommodate Ritchie and Rooney and Holmes....can they? :hmmm:


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Coca Fola on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 18:53:08
De Vita doesn't have the pace to be a good winger. He won't play any higher than this league imo. He's very predictable when he gets the ball, run in a straight line with your head down, roll the ball along with your foot, cut in onto your right, put a shit cross into the box.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Dr Pierre Chang on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 18:57:36
Well I certainly didn't see that one coming ???

I haven't trawled through the whole thread and I dare say the point has already been made but...is this paving the way for Ritchie to move on in the summer? Possibly to Southampton in a cash plus player (Lee Holmes obviously) deal?
Southampton are on the brink of the Premier League and if they want to stay there then they will be setting their sights much higher than Matt Ritchie. Absolutely no chance of that one happening.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Costanza on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 18:58:13
In the defence of De Vita, he's really a forward and helped us out when he couldn't get the right winger for love nor money.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Summerof69 on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 19:01:39
Great signing. When I saw it on the Beeb site at lunchtime, I knew the Pox sites would go into meltdown...again.

Regarding the wages part, Swindon are paying a bigger percentage than Pox of his Saints salary.

Saying that if you're a midfield player, wouldn't you want to be managed by a playing legend in PdC to enhance your career.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 19:06:23
wrong thread?

Negative


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Saxondale on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 19:08:32
Well I certainly didn't see that one coming ???

I haven't trawled through the whole thread and I dare say the point has already been made but...is this paving the way for Ritchie to move on in the summer? Possibly to Southampton in a cash plus player (Lee Holmes obviously) deal? It would make sense to get him in now and get him used to the system, training methods etc and a full pre-season and then he hits the ground running next season. I have to say, I can't think of a better replacement.

And let's face it, no team at our level can really accommodate Ritchie and Rooney and Holmes....can they? :hmmm:

Well the only way to play them would be for one to move into the centre as a deep lying striker with 2 holding midfielders. 4/2/3/1 style.

Obviously I have no idea what Im talking about but I have played FM.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Summerof69 on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 19:38:34
Maybe we should spread the rumour that we can afford this due to the money we received/saved from Pox in regards to Kerrouche !!!


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Flashheart on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 19:57:52
Well the only way to play them would be for one to move into the centre as a deep lying striker with 2 holding midfielders. 4/2/3/1 style.

Obviously I have no idea what Im talking about but I have played FM.


Ritchie has played as a striker before. In real life.

And if my memory serves me right, he scored as well.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Pete on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 20:17:00
Is it a definite that Rooney can't play in the JPT final but Holmes can? How much is winning this trophy worth? Might explain the signing. Sorry if this has been discussed, I haven't read all the threads.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: gingernuggets on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 20:20:25
Rooney's said before he prefers playing centrally than out wide so that could be a possibility although I'd have guessed the 3 would mainly be rotated whilst happy in the knowledge that we've already got Ritchie's replacement in case of some big bids.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: chalkies_shorts on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 20:36:27
Maybe we should spread the rumour that we can afford this due to the money we received/saved from Pox in regards to Kerrouche !!!
On the basis of 2700 Scummers at the CG - say £20 a chuck thats £54000 plus programmes etc say £60k - that bought Rooney and the wages saved pays for Holmes then thats a good deal for us I'd say. Maybe they'd like Lanzano or Smith in goal for a few weeks out of their yellow fund.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Summerof69 on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 20:42:05
Maybe they'd like Lanzano or Smith in goal for a few weeks out of their yellow fund.

Smithy will be on bench in the JPT....but I'll be quite happy for Lanzano to join the Pox.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: fittons_coaching_badge on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 20:49:02
Smithy will be on bench in the JPT....but I'll be quite happy for Lanzano to join the Pox.

I'd drive Lanzano there!


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: gingernuggets on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 20:57:15
Got to love his interview - 'It feels like home'! Ha ha good lad.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Summerof69 on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 20:58:46
I'd drive Lanzano there!

I think they'll be quite a few Town fans offering to do that.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: horlock07 on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 21:29:33
In the defence of De Vita, he's really a forward and helped us out when he couldn't get the right winger for love nor money.

totally agree with this, not saying he's a candidate for player of the year or anything, but he has impressed me doing a job long term out of position with no fuss.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: dphunt88 on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 21:31:39
Song wise:

"Holmes... Holmes will tear you apart again" (To the tune of Joy Division, Love will tear us apart)

Simple and it describes his style of play! What you reckon TEF?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: penhill red on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 21:36:50
United sing that song for Giggs.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: dphunt88 on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 21:40:12
United sing that song for Giggs.

If it's good enough for Giggs, then it's good enough for me!

Don't think Holmes will be making 900 appearances though



Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Not that Nice If I'm Honest on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 23:14:16
Forgive me if someone has allready pasted this, but it's a cracker

http://www.yellowsforum.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=oufcplayers&action=display&thread=7933&page=2

You have to read it from the start, they really like him "better than Ritchie or Rooney", and then it goes off a cliff


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: chalkies_shorts on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 23:24:39
The funniest thing I read on there was Championship in 5 years according to their Chairman who apparently is running their club prudently while ours is a cunt who will bankrupt us as we're shelling out shitloads and cant sustain it.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: ghanimah on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 23:37:17
The funniest thing I read on there was Championship in 5 years according to their Chairman who apparently is running their club prudently while ours is a cunt who will bankrupt us as we're shelling out shitloads and cant sustain it.

Apparently we both loaded and £12 million in debt at the same time, and hating us with so much venom is being passionate but Di Canio's antics aka passionate is being a dickhead.

It's an odd site, no wonder Oxford Fan comes on here so much, it must be the only way he gets to stay sane


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: TheMajorSTFC on Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 23:47:26
Song wise:

"Holmes... Holmes will tear you apart again" (To the tune of Joy Division, Love will tear us apart)

Simple and it describes his style of play! What you reckon TEF?

I'll be up for getting that going at Crewe after Holmes first cutting run down the line!


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: FormerlyPlymRed on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 00:19:24
Quality signing. My Oxford supporting 'friend' is not happy, hes been their top performer for the past few weeks and hes gutted that hes not going back.

Hes still a deluded cunt though, reckons they will sneak in the autos  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick: :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: wiggy on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 06:51:12
I was working on Oxford Market yesterday when the news broke.

Several of the Stewards are Oxford ST holders and they were really, really pissed off.

Nice one.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: tans on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 07:50:15
http://oxblogger.blogspot.com/2012/03/open-letter-to-swindon-town.html?m=1


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Bogus Dave on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 08:23:17
I saw that. Whilst some of what he says has truth to it, it's ultimatley a contradictory mess. He's tried to grab the moral high ground and missed. By a long way


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Costanza on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 08:24:36
Swindon and Oxford fans are rubbish at being rivals. We are so self-conscious and obsessed with putting the idea across that we are not obsessed with eachother.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: ScillyRed on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 08:32:42
Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 14:41:02
Men who see men who have seen other men in the gym.

Men who get confused about comments men make.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Matchworn Shirts on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 15:09:11
I saw that. Whilst some of what he says has truth to it, it's ultimatley a contradictory mess. He's tried to grab the moral high ground and missed. By a long way

He says he doesn't care about us, then writes an essay about us.
Idiot


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Chubbs on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 15:16:04
gave up after the 2nd paragraph


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 15:31:05
I couldn't read it all, it made me breathless trying to, because of, all, the, damned, commas.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Trashbat? on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 15:38:16
Quote
I don't really have much time to care about you.

....other than the time to write an open letter to Swindon Town


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: kaufman on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 15:50:45
Ardiles has written the perfect reply, well done sir.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: reeves4england on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 17:50:07
Ardiles has written the perfect reply, well done sir.

Where? Have I missed something?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: reeves4england on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 18:06:01
Ahh yes, good response


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: DRS on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 18:21:39
Could someone post it here? don't want that cunts blog getting more hits.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 18:21:50
It's quite well written and some of it is fair comment.

However, it's fantastically ironic that someone who says 'I don’t care. Really, I don’t care,' can go on to write a 1500 word essay on the very subject which they don't care about and then make the comment 'Your obsession with us is worrying'

Some people have too much time on their hands.



Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Peter Venkman on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 18:29:48
Could someone post it here? don't want that cunts blog getting more hits.

Quote
An open letter to Swindon Town
Dear Swindon Town
Firstly, sorry for writing to you en masse like this but I feel it’s time we talked.

Let’s be honest, it’s been a good season for both of us. You are set to win the league and we are continuing our steady recovery from a decade of neglect with real potential for clinching a play-off spot. I guess we had hoped to be higher, but objectively, we’re pretty happy with where we are at the moment. Something you learn when you’re in the doldrums is to keep life in perspective. Who knows, this time next year we could both be in League 1? Wouldn’t that be nice?

Now, I don’t have a massive problem with you to be honest. For example, I quite like your manager. I don’t agree with his politics, but I’m assuming that he’s not actively ethnic cleansing anyone at the moment and a man is more complex than his ideological persuasion. He’s charismatic and funny. I like listening to his interviews. He plays a great villain with his sun glasses and histrionics and all that scarf waving.

I have to say, I feel uncomfortable addressing you as one, like you're all the same. You're not all bad. The Washbag, the Swindon blog, has got to be amongst the best on the web. It’s coverage of the derby was first class; intelligently partisan. You should read it, support it and encourage its progress.

And congratulations on Matt Ritchie, by the way. He’s clearly quite a good player. His performance at the Kassam was completely overshadowed by his assault on our ball boy, of course. But he was magnanimous enough to apologise after the final whistle and it was all a bit in the heat of the moment.

We’re pleased to have kept James Constable, he means a lot to us. Be honest, you wanted him. You don’t make three bids and spout lies and nonsense in the press, like your manager did, if you don't want a player. He didn’t want to go. Because if he wanted to go, he’d have gone. Footballers and clubs are very good at making deals happen if they want them to. And it didn’t happen. If you’re right, however, and Di Canio did pull out due to Constable's hesitation, you might want to ask why your manager is prepared to risk your club's money on whimsical big money bids. Believe me, that’s just not healthy; the man has a rampant ego, you might want to watch that. Please stop pretending that you didn’t want Constable and that he wanted to come. It’s just not doing you any good.

And while we’re at it, let’s just keep the Lee Holmes thing in perspective. This isn’t Mo Johnston breaching a century-old religious divide moving from Celtic to Rangers. We signed Lee briefly on loan. He did pretty well for us, including two lovely crosses for the goals in the derby. He has decided to come to you. Surely you don't believe that he's moved for anything other than business reasons. He might help you win the title but, you were already going to win that anyway. He hasn't moved to spite us, he’s moved so that he can gad around as a ‘title winner’ in May and, I suspect, because Southampton got a better financial deal out of your lot. So you're spending more money on a player you don't need. I don't know, perhaps you can afford it, but why are you stockpiling expensive players?

We’ll ignore Mehdi Kerrouche, whose move has been largely inconsequential. He didn’t really ‘do it’ for us, and I suspect he’ll now rot in the reserve for you. No gain there.

Now, let’s deal with one of those portentous phrases you keep using; ‘Forever in our shadow’. Am I right to assume this is some sort of analogy to illustrate how we’re supposedly cowering from your luminous glory? Let’s be honest, neither of us can really claim any great glory in our recent history. We enjoy our clubs and what they stand for, and we enjoy our successes when they happen. But your glories are not so bright as to cast a significant shadow over anyone.

Sorry, you’re just not that important. There's nothing for us to be jealous of. In two years time, no one will remember your League 2 title. I’m sorry, they won’t. Don’t get me wrong, I would love for us to win a title, that will be very important to me and my club. But I don't expect it to cast a shadow over anyone else, including you. And just because we're not winning the title doesn’t mean I'm bothered that you are. Your self importance is a bit bewildering and somewhat overstated. You just don’t cast a shadow over us, or anyone (nor do we, but then we don't claim to). I go to games all the time and, honestly, nobody is talking about you. We're too busy talking about us. Which is just how it should be.

And then there’s this whole ‘our cup final’ thing about the actual derby games. It seems to me that you make a a lot of noise about everything to do with Oxford and Swindon except the actual games. I guess that’s because we won both of them this season. It’s still quite odd that you don’t seem to even acknowledge them. I have to say I enjoyed the games immensely this year, particularly the home game, which was epic in every sense from the setting to the nature of our win. And, of course, you played your part magnificently. You surely have to recognise that it was dramatic, even though the result wasn’t one you were looking for.

And what about your claims around our imminent financial meltdown? Where has that come from? Your insults would have more resonance if they had some credibility, perhaps some wit. Instead, you guess and lie and believe stuff that satisfies this odd fantasy that you've created in your head. It makes you a bit daft.

You see, Swindon Town, my problem is that we’ve played our games and we’ve moved on. The more you badger on about signing Lee Holmes, or your youth team victories, or beating Dagenham or the fact you’re top of the league, or the shadow you cast, or that you have four stands or the way you put #oufc in your tweets about things which are only vaguely related to us, leads me to but one thought.

I don’t care.

Really, I don’t care.

Seasons are better when we’re together; we’re good for each other because it gives us something to look forward to. Big games are really fun, much better than run-of-the-mill games against anyone else. But the excitement, our rivalry, is about the games. Nothing else. I don’t care about your grandstanding, I don’t care about your league position, I don’t care about your decidedly average achievements, I don’t care about your players, even if they’ve played for us in the past. I have children and a job and a house to renovate, and a blog to write. I don't really have much time to care about you. I just don't. And yet, there you are, going on and on and on about how wonderful you are. Your not going to convince me, and if I'm not listening, then you're talking to yourself. That way madness lies.

I do think your manager is funny, he makes me laugh and I think he's actually added to the drama this year. I’m pretty sure that he doesn’t have the mental stability, loyalty or ability to take you much beyond where you are. But he’s done well and he’s your problem.

You're going for the title, we're going for the play-offs. We have different objectives. Your only influence on us now is if you take points off teams around us. If you beat them, which I’m sure you want to, then we’d be very grateful. Perhaps you’ll deliberately lose to them to spite us, but that would be silly. Then again, given that the rivalry appears to centre on everything else BUT the actual games we play against each other, perhaps you will.

Your obsession with us is worrying, you might need help. Is your team not enough for you? Really, we’re flattered by your attention, it’s sweet, but it's getting a little creepy. You expend so much energy talking about us, I'm beginning to think, well, you really love us. If you didn't like us, you'd go and do something else, but you don't. I do suggest you find a hobby or something to fill up the time you currently spend thinking about us, because you're lovely, but you're not really my type, thanks.

So, turn around, walk away. Enjoy your season and your club. Clubs like ours don't enjoy success very often, so you should savour it while you can. I'm sure we'll meet again, and we can renew the argument about who is best on the pitch. In the meantime, I hope you're happy in all you do.

Lots of love
Oxblogger


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: ghanimah on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 18:42:19
It's quite well written and some of it is fair comment.

However, it's fantastically ironic that someone who says 'I don’t care. Really, I don’t care,' can go on to write a 1500 word essay on the very subject which they don't care about and then make the comment 'Your obsession with us is worrying'

Some people have too much time on their hands.



Agreed, I would only add that it's also a tad patronising


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Abrahammer on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 18:47:33
He's right on a few points but its probably about a 25% truth, 80% patronising bollocks split.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: DRS on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 19:06:24
Cheers JJ.I meant Ardiles response :-)


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: ghanimah on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 19:16:32
Cheers JJ.I meant Ardiles response :-)

"Oxblogger

Enjoyed reading that. I thought it was a thoughtful and humorous blog. But it wasn't without its contradictions.

The first, and most obvious, of the contradictions is the one pointed out above by Newbury Robin. The very existence of this blog entry is testament to the fact that you are irritated by the barbs and 'Forever in our shadow' needling by Swindon fans on the internet and have not 'moved on'. While this may not come naturally to you as a blogger, the only way to demonstrate that you really don't care is to look the other way and ignore it. Completely.

There is a second, more important, point, however - and that is that you make the mistake of extrapolating views expressed by a relatively small number of Swindon fans on the internet across the whole of the club's fan base. Add together the traffic on twitter.com and other fan specific sites such as thetownend.com and (as you rightly point out, the excellent) thewashbag.com and you will get a snapshot of views and opinions from a cross-section of Swindon's support. But is that cross-section representative of the fan base as a whole? I would argue that it almost certainly is not - because the cross-section is self-selecting. It may be diverse in a number of respects, but all of the contributors writing about (for example) Oxford United have one thing in common...they all have something to say about Oxford United. Those that do not, don't post comments.

How many fans contribute regularly to all of these sites? Maybe a couple of hundred. And how many form the fan base as a whole? Take 7,000 regulars and exiles/occasionals numbering several times that number, and you will have several tens of thousands. And this is the important bit. The vast majority of that number care very little for Oxford United, or any other club, other than in the days immediately before and after a game between the clubs.

So you can rest easy. The majority of our fans stopped fretting about the defeat at the Kassam approximately 3 days later when we came back to the County Ground and put 4 past Dagenham without reply. When we followed that win up with another against Cheltenham at the weekend, the Oxford defeat was a distant memory. Of course we don't like losing - least of all to a local rival like Oxford - but it's hardly the end of the world...especially with a title very much there for the taking and the prospect of our first cup win for 43 years (to the day, as it happens).

Very few of our fans display the 'obsession' that you appear concerned with. Sadly, most of those that do will find an outlet for their obsession on the internet. I am sure this is equally true for both sets of fans."


Title: Re: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Frigby Daser on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 19:20:41
Work must be incredibly quiet at the moment...


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: TheMajorSTFC on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 22:56:27
Oxblogger-Still obsessed and full of contradictions!


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: DRS on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 23:01:05
Cheers for that Ghanimah.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Baggins on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 23:05:04
I read the piece by Oxblogger.  I thought everything Ardiles did - but there is no way I could have put it across in such an eloquent and well-reasoned manner.  


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Crispy on Thursday, March 15, 2012, 23:49:38
What a cunt.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Friday, March 16, 2012, 07:02:52
Excellent response Ardiles, I couldn't possibly have put it any better :nod:


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Costanza on Friday, March 16, 2012, 07:40:28
I do like oxbloggers use of the age old technique of opening with praise and then going off on one.

But that's ok...... He's a blogger.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Peter Venkman on Friday, March 16, 2012, 08:23:48
Cheers JJ.I meant Ardiles response :-)
Sorry mate :D


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Ardiles on Friday, March 16, 2012, 09:15:05
Thanks fellas.

Work must be incredibly quiet at the moment...

Cheeky fucker...I wrote that on the train.   :)


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: NZrobin on Friday, March 16, 2012, 23:03:12
Trust me, it was a major disappointment here in Auckland that Pox beat STFC....not once but twice this season. 

No, not forgotten in 3 x days either      :(


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Rodney on Friday, March 16, 2012, 23:18:42
Trust me, it was a major disappointment here in Auckland that Pox beat STFC....not once but twice this season.  

No, not forgotten in 3 x days either      :(

Keep yourself away from the Sky Tower then Jafa ;)


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 22:13:19
Saw a post on the Gills match day topic that made reference to Holmes having been disappointing. I hadn't said anything before, but I had been wondering whether bringing him in had been a backwards step? Prior to his arrival, it sounded from matchday commentary, that we had a pretty good balance of options on the left with Rooney being creative and a bit of a handful and DeVita being workmanlike and generally effective - Although potentially missing that spark of threat.

Then, the Oxford game happened and Holmes sounded as if he tore us a new arsehole in patches. That, combined with the spell that he put in at the club a few years ago, excited most of us when he was signed on loan.

However, in the Chesterfield game, what I saw was that he looked predictable, and after the defence had worked him out he quickly lost impact and then faded from the game. What I have heard on commentary, suggests he does some pretty things or has a wayward blast or two. But he doesn't sound a great threat. Added to that is the fact that Rooney seems to have gone off the boil and also seems to have dropped down the pecking order a bit - Something happen in training? Was it a gentlemen's agreement that he wasn't involved today?

When Holmes was asked after the game whether he want to stay, he suggested that he was waiting for the club to contact him. I found myself thinking that I was glad that the club hasnt jumped too soon - Something that I wouldn't have thought I'd say when the loan was announced.

Am I way off the mark here?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Shaw Rosso on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 22:25:23
Saw a post on the Gills match day topic that made reference to Holmes having been disappointing. I hadn't said anything before, but I had been wondering whether bringing him in had been a backwards step? Prior to his arrival, it sounded from matchday commentary, that we had a pretty good balance of options on the left with Rooney being creative and a bit of a handful and DeVita being workmanlike and generally effective - Although potentially missing that spark of threat.

Then, the Oxford game happened and Holmes sounded as if he tore us a new arsehole in patches. That, combined with the spell that he put in at the club a few years ago, excited most of us when he was signed on loan.

However, in the Chesterfield game, what I saw was that he looked predictable, and after the defence had worked him out he quickly lost impact and then faded from the game. What I have heard on commentary, suggests he does some pretty things or has a wayward blast or two. But he doesn't sound a great threat. Added to that is the fact that Rooney seems to have gone off the boil and also seems to have dropped down the pecking order a bit - Something happen in training? Was it a gentlemen's agreement that he wasn't involved today?

When Holmes was asked after the game whether he want to stay, he suggested that he was waiting for the club to contact him. I found myself thinking that I was glad that the club hasnt jumped too soon - Something that I wouldn't have thought I'd say when the loan was announced.

Am I way off the mark here?

You have a point, but perhaps his lengthy injury issues and not really settling at one club for too long are something that can be worked on with a decent pre season under PDC? I see glimpses of Holmes at times and think he is fantastic, other times he is somewhat predictable, much like Rooney (he was out because of the gentlemans agreement, and was dropped from the matchday squad for last weekends shenanigans).

I think Holmes and Rooney are both in need of learning to mix there game up a bit, Rooney in particular, you can read his cut inside like a book and seems to miss playing the obvious ball quite often.

i do think Holmes will be an asset in League 1, and beyond that too, and if we dont sign him you can guarantee he will sign for Bournemouth and score against us home and away.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Bogus Dave on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 22:28:01
I think Holmes has done better than Rooney


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Shaw Rosso on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 22:33:27
I think Holmes has done better than Rooney

Agreed, does Rooney run the risk of ending up a Kentish version of Anthony McNamee?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 22:37:23
I wonder whether Rooney is the type of player that doesn't do well when there is competition for his place?

Or is he just crap?


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Nijholts Nuts on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 22:37:39
Agreed, does Rooney run the risk of ending up a Kentish version of Anthony McNamee?
Not yet, he hasnt become an 'up his own arse 'I'm too big for this club, I'll play in the reserves for a bigger club' cunt'.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: chalkies_shorts on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 22:43:52
I wouldn't sign Holmes. I think we can do better. He's got fuck all pace, waits for the ball instead of attacking it, can't shoot and his delivery isn't great. I see a footballer on his way out. He's not had a good game for us since he's been back.
We'll need better next season.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: pericarp on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 22:45:55
I wouldn't sign Holmes. I think we can do better. He's got fuck all pace, waits for the ball instead of attacking it, can't shoot and his delivery isn't great. I see a footballer on his way out. He's not had a good game for us since he's been back.
We'll need better next season.

I disagree. I think he's a little predictable at times but is definitely a good league one level. He's shown glimpses of what he can do, I wasn't so sure of him at Chesterfield, but recently he seems to be doing okay. Not when he's on the right wing though.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: chalkies_shorts on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 22:47:15
I disagree. I think he's a little predictable at times but is definitely a good league one level. He's shown glimpses of what he can do, I wasn't so sure of him at Chesterfield, but recently he seems to be doing okay. Not when he's on the right wing though.
He was fucking shite today on the left


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: pericarp on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 22:48:12
He was fucking shite today on the left

Everyone was shit apart from Bostock today by most accounts.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: LucienSanchez on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 22:50:19
I actually think I prefer Rooney... he offers that something different, and has scored and assisted a fair few in his cameos - if he can be more consistent and put in top effort every game he'll be a real asset. I'm not slating Homles, but i have been slightly disappointed by his contribution.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: donkey on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 22:53:06
Rooney has already contributed to this season, and will prove to be a good signing next season.  I expect Holmes will, too.  Wingers always split opinions, but to compare to McNamee?  Very unfair, imho.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: chalkies_shorts on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 22:53:18
Most were shit but from numerous games this season we know a lot of players aren't shite. A lot have proved themselves at this level. Some i believe will be good enough at a higher level. Holmes has not yet proved himself at this level and i see nothing to siggest he can performa a level above - and no, he din;t tear us another arsehole at Scumland.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Shaw Rosso on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 22:57:35
Rooney has already contributed to this season, and will prove to be a good signing next season.  I expect Holmes will, too.  Wingers always split opinions, but to compare to McNamee?  Very unfair, imho.

I think the point was more he could end up a bit of a one trick pony, such as McNamee


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: donkey on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 22:58:51
I think the point was more he could end up a bit of a one trick pony, such as McNamee
Ah, OK.  I think he's young enough for that not to happen, I thought McNamee was mid 20s when we signed him.  Cue someone showing Rooney was actually a week older than McNamee when we signed them...


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Coca Fola on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 22:59:59
McNamee is better than Rooney and Homles. In my opinion anyway.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Arriba on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 23:02:05
Holmes is a bit of a luxury player. Decent but not convinced he matches our ambitions. Most of our squad are the same mind and we have spent big this year.
I've slated the board before,but they have backed di canio big time this season.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: adje on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 23:18:22
McNamee is better than Rooney and Homles. In my opinion anyway.

I agree


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Berniman on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 23:22:10
Rooney needs to hit the byeline once and a while, he always cuts in on his right and becomes predictable after a while.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: SwindonTartanArmy on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 23:27:08
To be honest, I am quite dissapointed that Holmes seems to have been played on the left so much. I assumed that he had been signed to provied Ritchie with competition.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: deltaincline on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 23:32:24
No offence, but Holmes looks like a journeyman winger to me. Bandy-legged, no real pace and very predictable.

We'll need better quality than him if we are to push on next season


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: SouthcoastRed on Saturday, April 21, 2012, 23:52:44
Holmes appears to flatter to deceive...

He frustrates me because he always appears to 'do the hard work' then miss an opportunity.
There have been a number of times where he has the ball, the fast break is on... he glides past one... two... cuts inside as the town storm forward.... and then just puts his foot on the ball and allows the box to fill up with defenders.

If he was to have a few sessions with Yoda and learn to 'let go of his fears' - I think he would be awesome.

 :(






Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Sippo on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 06:02:56
I heard he'll get a two year contract @ £5k per week.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Batch on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 06:35:00
I like Holmes. So there.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: DiV on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 06:39:51
Holmes is shit. All our players are shit. We're going to get relegated and we're all going to die.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Only Me on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 07:04:14
McNamee is better than Rooney and Homles. In my opinion anyway.

No he isn't


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: tans on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 07:08:59
I used to hate mcnamee


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: thedarkprince on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 07:21:04
No he isn't

In your opinion.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: DRS on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 07:57:57
Think people maybe a bit harsh here.I think he is unfortunate in a way that he has ended up here when we have been poor in general and that we have had key players injured meaning the whole team have suffered


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: RJack on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 08:20:55
Not forgetting that Holmes has been played out of position the last few games too.  There have been times when Holmes has got forward only for no fucker to be in the box so he's had to hold up play and by that time it's too late.

Next season with a PDC pre-season under him we will have a great player.  I also think McEvily will benefit from a pre-season under PDC too.

There has been a lot of criticism about Rooney but he is still a young lad and i still firmly believe we haven't see the best of him yet either. With the trainng and right attitude he will be another asset for us.

I though Bostock was easily our man of the mmatch yesterday considering he hadn't played since Wembley.  He looks a dangerous player and i hope he gets a start next week either linking up with Benson or playing alongside him


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Only Me on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 08:24:14
In your opinion.
Of course.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Barnard on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 08:28:22
Paolo's been looking for a big powerful Centre Forward all season. I'm witholding judgement on Holmes until I see how he gets on with someone to throw crosses at.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 10:13:09
He has had a few decent games but i have to say he hasnt impressed me that much. Is it me or does he seem really slow and sluggish at times? Maybe its a fitness issue.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Cibocchi_Is_God on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 11:02:13
Has had lots of injuries in his career. I think that's why he's so cautious when running at teams, dosent want a reoccurence of injury. Seems slower/less exciting than he was when last here...


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: joteddyred on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 11:02:58
He has had a few decent games but i have to say he hasnt impressed me that much. Is it me or does he seem really slow and sluggish at times? Maybe its a fitness issue.

No it isn't just you.  He also seems completely unable to get past a defender.  If he can't get past a League 2 defender then what good will he be in League 1.

He's put in a few decent crosses, but far more that have been cleared with ease.

Personally I would have hoped we could pick somebody up who offers a bit more for next season.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 11:12:58
No it isn't just you.  He also seems completely unable to get past a defender.  If he can't get past a League 2 defender then what good will he be in League 1.

He's put in a few decent crosses, but far more that have been cleared with ease.

Personally I would have hoped we could pick somebody up who offers a bit more for next season.

His crosses can be good. Sometimes they are really good but there is no one on the end of them. That's a big problem too.

He is predictable that's my main worry other than his fitness. He hugs the touchline too much and defenders know how to defend him. If he cut in more like Ritchie and Rooney then that would improve his game.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Batch on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 11:15:25
But I think Rooney is incredibly predictable, cuts inside and practically never goes outside.

That said, Paul Allen didn't do too bad doing that.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Bogus Dave on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 11:18:55
I don't think Holmes has done that bad, I just think people had massively high expectations of him which he's struggled to meet through no fault of his own


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Simon Pieman on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 16:05:59
Rooney has 7 assists and 2 goals in 13 starts (and 5 sub appearances) which is impressive.

Some people only seem to be remembering the last few games and the whole team hasn't performed.



Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Simon Pieman on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 16:08:09
Holmes has 1 goal and 1 assist in 9 starts (and 3 sub appearances). Doing better isn't he?

p.s. not slating Holmes as I think he is a decent player and has had some good moments for us but he isn't better than Rooney based on this evidence.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Batch on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 16:17:28
Rooney is a good player, no doubt. Only 21 so lets see how he develops. McNamee was 24ish when he got here.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: leefer on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 16:35:12
Holmes has 1 goal and 1 assist in 9 starts (and 3 sub appearances). Doing better isn't he?

p.s. not slating Holmes as I think he is a decent player and has had some good moments for us but he isn't better than Rooney based on this evidence.

Have to agree,not consistant enough for me.
He looks class at times but you wonder how he ended up in lge 2.....maybe the injury toll.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: FormerlyPlymRed on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 16:37:25
Rooney is a good player, no doubt. Only 21 so lets see how he develops. McNamee was 24ish when he got here.
Didnt realise Rooney is only 21, thought he was 24ish. Lots of time to improve then!

None of our wingers are particularly fast which could be something to look for, although i suppose the final ball is more important than pace, Alan O'brien for example


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Ardiles on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 18:04:01
Rooney is precisely the kind of player who can grow with the club.  Think Digby and Ling in the mid 1980s, and Bodin a couple of seasons later.  (I'm making a vastly optimistic assumption about our trajectory during the next few years.)  :)


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Bewster on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 18:35:22
How much will players grow next year when they have a little bit more time and space on the ball?

I don't think it is any coincidence that our best perfornace have been against higher opposition. I think that Rooney and Homles will be even better next year, along with Ferry, Ritchie and hopefully Risser/Smith.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: blinkpip on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 18:47:49
Were top and every week someone starts a thread laying into our players, I never known so much crap people are spouting out these last few months. Get a grip people, either back our players and Di Canio or fuck off.

(oh, and Holmes will be our best player next season, and all you doubters can kiss his ass)


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: joteddyred on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 18:55:21
Were top and every week someone starts a thread laying into our players, I never known so much crap people are spouting out these last few months. Get a grip people, either back our players and Di Canio or fuck off.

(oh, and Holmes will be our best player next season, and all you doubters can kiss his ass)

To be fair the thread was initially started to say he was signing on loan.  It's just now developed from that into people's opinions of him since he's been here.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: A Gent Orange on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 19:00:13
Rooney is a very good player and a very gifted player. However, he doesn't work back, he doesn't know how to change his game and he doesn't support those around him. That's why he gets hauled off -because if the full-back has sussed him he can't and won't do anything to redress that. Sure, if the ball is going his way he can be very good but he won't just be solid if it isn't, so he has to come off.

Forget which home game it was but we were pulling the opposition out to the right flank and Rooney was sat in acres of space. It looked like a deliberate tactic to allow him to come inside and destroy them - but because we couldn't feed him, he did nothing.

He didn't get closer to Benson, he didn't even offer the midfield the odd short ball and then spin out behind. He waited and wandered until PDC hauled him off and De Vita went on. He contested everything, he supported and he protected and then we went ahead.

He's great, but he can also be a passenger. Holmes is never a passenger, he tries and tries and tries.  Even when, as in that game the other flank is giving him nothing or as in the JPT, the full-backs and wingers are doubling up. This isn't an either or we need both types of player.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: Sippo on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 19:24:21
Didn't Gills say he never tracked back as well when he played for them? He is still young so maybe a good preseason will sort him out.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: chalkies_shorts on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 19:29:31
Were top and every week someone starts a thread laying into our players, I never known so much crap people are spouting out these last few months. Get a grip people, either back our players and Di Canio or fuck off.

(oh, and Holmes will be our best player next season, and all you doubters can kiss his ass)
Its perfectly reasonable to talk about a player on loan and speculate whether we'll sign him or not. How is it having a go or should we just worship anything STFC?
I think he's shit and wouldn't sign him - others completely disagree. If he gets in the top 5 of player of the year next year then I'll gladly kiss his ass. 
I think you are the one who needs to get a grip. Fancy fans on a football forum giving their opinions - fuck me, what next.


Title: Re: Lee Homles
Post by: carbonwhite on Sunday, April 22, 2012, 21:37:19
Rooney is the most promising out of the 3 mentioned, only 21 like someone mentioned and gets a few assist here and there.

yeah he cuts inside to often but from what i remember he hasnt got much of a left foot so thats understandable. he can only get better and yes a pre season with pdc will be good for him.

imho i think we play better with rooney and ritchie on the wings than we do with holmes/ritchie partnership. seems like we score more aswell not sure about the stats though but im sure someone will find them.