Thetownend.com

25% => The Reg Smeeton Match Day Action/Reaction Forum => Topic started by: Tails on Saturday, December 3, 2005, 20:19:24



Title: Mick Harford
Post by: Tails on Saturday, December 3, 2005, 20:19:24
Says his team had a load of chances.

Now I only listened on the radio, but to me it sounded like they didn't create anything? Also we had more than one chance by the sound of it.

His comments are amazingly biased.


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: Spud on Saturday, December 3, 2005, 20:43:27
Sorry but Iffy said they had alot of chances.


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: DiV on Saturday, December 3, 2005, 20:55:23
They had a lot of chances, more than one off the line lots of last minutes blocks and some great saves from Evans. We only had about 4 chances all game


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: Simon Pieman on Saturday, December 3, 2005, 20:59:50
That's what the away game is about. Sneaking 3 points whatever happens. Something we needed to do at Vale really.


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: Stef Troll on Saturday, December 3, 2005, 21:17:10
Yeah the first half sounded comfortable, with the second half a bit more backs to the walls kind of stuff

.  However we got the 3 points, and dug deep. It sounded as if the boys put a lot of effort in, which is nice to here. :D


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: Spencer_White on Sunday, December 4, 2005, 11:16:54
Harford is correct. On another day Rotherham could have beaten us by 5 goals. But we defended well.

Rotherham fans are probably gutted. But who cares?  :twisted:  More undeserved 3 points please.  :mrgreen:


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: my-velocity on Sunday, December 4, 2005, 11:25:57
Quote from: "Spencer_White"
Harford is correct. On another day Rotherham could have beaten us by 5 goals. But we defended well.

Rotherham fans are probably gutted. But who cares?  :twisted:  More undeserved 3 points please.  :mrgreen:


Thats the key when away or home, defend well and attack well. If you got that in a team, well your going to win or draw matches.


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: DiV on Sunday, December 4, 2005, 12:03:20
we had one shot on target the whole game, ace  :mrgreen:


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: Luci on Sunday, December 4, 2005, 12:07:58
Quote from: "simon pieman"
That's what the away game is about. Sneaking 3 points whatever happens. Something we needed to do at Vale really.


We definitely deserved three points at Vale without a shadow of a doubt.  We haven't really had much luck this season with regards to flukey wins, own goals from the opposition etc. so stealing 3 points at Rotherham seemed long overdue!

All that matters is that our bottom spot has been occupied by City which certainly made my day!  :mrgreen:


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: Simon Pieman on Sunday, December 4, 2005, 13:01:36
Cheer up Gary Johnson
Oh what can it mean?....

 :beers:


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: my-velocity on Sunday, December 4, 2005, 13:22:03
To a sad city, and a shitty footie team  :-))(


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Sunday, December 4, 2005, 14:20:39
Quote from: "simon pieman"
Cheer up Gary Johnson
Oh what can it mean?....

 :beers:


i think it is totally hilarious that they are the only team below us!  :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: santini on Sunday, December 4, 2005, 15:19:49
Quote from: "DV85"
we had one shot on target the whole game, ace  
We had 2 more clear chances when the ball was knocked back across the goal and all it needed was a tap in.


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: Leggett on Sunday, December 4, 2005, 15:19:50
they'll probably walk league2 next year :P


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: sonicyouth on Sunday, December 4, 2005, 15:55:02
Quote from: "santini"
Quote from: "DV85"
we had one shot on target the whole game, ace  
We had 2 more clear chances when the ball was knocked back across the goal and all it needed was a tap in.


if only  :cry:


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: DiV on Sunday, December 4, 2005, 16:19:27
Quote from: "santini"
Quote from: "DV85"
we had one shot on target the whole game, ace  
We had 2 more clear chances when the ball was knocked back across the goal and all it needed was a tap in.


I totally agree and have made that point to Rotherham fans on others forums.

A shot on target isnt the same as creating a chance in my opinion, we created 3 good chances, as you said two went across the goal and just needed a tap in.


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: Bedford Red on Sunday, December 11, 2005, 10:41:55
http://www.themillers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/News/NewsDetail/0,,10360~753660,00.html

He's been sacked, not a big surprise going on their recent results.

I think he is one of those people who is excellent as a coach but when it comes to management they don't find it so easy.


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: STFC Village on Sunday, December 11, 2005, 10:44:09
Get him back here! (As if we could afford him :-))( )


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: DiV on Sunday, December 11, 2005, 13:24:10
Quote from: "STFC Village"
Get him back here! (As if we could afford him :-))( )


as if we would want him?


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: STFC Village on Sunday, December 11, 2005, 13:25:19
Why not? Good, experienced coach (not as manager btw)


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: DiV on Sunday, December 11, 2005, 13:27:46
Quote from: "STFC Village"
Why not? Good, experienced coach (not as manager btw)


whats on his cv though

sacked from Nottm Forest
did naff all at Swindon as Kings number 2
sacked from Rotherham


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: Tails on Sunday, December 11, 2005, 13:30:55
Reeves and Woan did better as Kings number 2.


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: STFC Village on Sunday, December 11, 2005, 13:31:12
Quote from: "DV85"
did naff all at Swindon as Kings number 2
And how long was he here? Not long enough to make an impact


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: Tails on Sunday, December 11, 2005, 13:32:16
thats because he fucked off to Roterham!


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: STFC Village on Sunday, December 11, 2005, 13:33:55
Quote from: "Tails"
thats because he fucked off to Roterham!
And so he should have!


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: my-velocity on Monday, December 12, 2005, 22:42:41
Quote from: "STFC Village"
Quote from: "Tails"
thats because he fucked off to Roterham!
And so he should have!


 :clap:


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Monday, December 12, 2005, 22:46:57
Harford was working for nothing at the CG.....the only way he could come back would be if he was prepared to undertake similar voluntary work.


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: Whits on Tuesday, December 13, 2005, 00:19:19
Quote from: "STFC Village"
Quote from: "DV85"
did naff all at Swindon as Kings number 2
And how long was he here? Not long enough to make an impact


wasn't it the same month king won manager of the month?


Title: Mick Harford
Post by: Ben Wah Balls on Tuesday, December 13, 2005, 03:44:37
That was February and Harford didn't arrive until right at the end so no.