|
Title: thoughts Post by: DMR on Wednesday, November 16, 2005, 10:55:57 1. the australians are the still the number one side because they're clinical... we struggled to kill of the tail throughout the ashes and that was the case with pakistan
2. getting over the winning line... again comes down to clinicalism (if thats a word)- we struggled at old trafford, egbaston, trent bridge and now again 3. people saying how we missed vaughans captaincy... maybe, but the fact is the game didn't really need captaincy it needed a steady batting performance and it would have been a comfortable win... i feel for marcus who has once again proved himself englands best batsman 4. kevin pieterson... i'm still not sure :? i don't think he's got the patience to be a quality test batsman and i can't see that changing, he is just the way he si Title: thoughts Post by: larwood on Wednesday, November 16, 2005, 11:10:23 The aussies are the number one side,they have dominated for so long,i doubt anyone [apart from johnno :wink: ]would question that.For us to go top of the rankings we had to win 2-0 and the aussies had to lose 2-0,which isn't and wasn't going to happen.They also happen to have two of the best bowlers ever,which helps.
I don't think the tail was the problem is this game,i think we bowled well,and kept at it,in all honesty the bowlers were let down by the batsmen. I think K.P is the real deal,but your right,his patience and ability to ground out an innings is questionable.Its alright to play the way he does when things are going well,but the shot he got out with today was awful.Sometimes i wish Sir Geoff could have a bat :wink: Title: Re: thoughts Post by: Spud on Wednesday, November 16, 2005, 16:19:03 Quote from: "dave_m_russell" 1. the australians are the still the number one side because they're clinical... we struggled to kill of the tail throughout the ashes and that was the case with pakistan 2. getting over the winning line... again comes down to clinicalism (if thats a word)- we struggled at old trafford, egbaston, trent bridge and now again 3. people saying how we missed vaughans captaincy... maybe, but the fact is the game didn't really need captaincy it needed a steady batting performance and it would have been a comfortable win... i feel for marcus who has once again proved himself englands best batsman 4. kevin pieterson... i'm still not sure :? i don't think he's got the patience to be a quality test batsman and i can't see that changing, he is just the way he si I dont think that was the case with Pakistan!, i mean in their 2nd innings they lost their last 7 wickets for 75 runs i wouldnt say thats a struggle to get them out. We lost this test because yet again the middle order were unable to get any partnerships going(Freddie excluded), if only we had got another 50 runs. :cry: Title: thoughts Post by: larwood on Wednesday, November 16, 2005, 16:22:00 Quote We lost this test because yet again the middle order were unable to get any partnerships going(Freddie excluded), if only we had got another 50 runs And Butt not being given out when he was obviously run out :wink: Title: thoughts Post by: Spud on Wednesday, November 16, 2005, 16:22:48 Quote from: "larwood" Quote We lost this test because yet again the middle order were unable to get any partnerships going(Freddie excluded), if only we had got another 50 runs And Butt not being given out when he was obviously run out :wink: Fancy having an Pakistani as 3rd umpire. :evil: Title: thoughts Post by: larwood on Wednesday, November 16, 2005, 16:35:50 There were a few positives,we caught well and Tres and Bell batted well and i thought the bowlers were good too.So i don't feel too down- hearted its just set the series up nicely.
Unfortunately i can't get back the lost hours of sleep :-))( ,at least the next test at Faisalabad might start a bit later :) . Title: thoughts Post by: Boeta on Saturday, November 19, 2005, 02:08:13 KP and Bell will the biggest international batsmen for the next five years. the new lara and dravid if you will
Title: thoughts Post by: Reg Smeeton on Saturday, November 19, 2005, 02:12:26 I'd trade an Ashes victory over a win in Pakistan anyday.
Title: thoughts Post by: Johno on Saturday, November 19, 2005, 11:23:23 Quote from: "larwood" The aussies are the number one side,they have dominated for so long,i doubt anyone [apart from johnno :wink: ]would question that. i haven't questionned that, i just think that if we beat pakistan and india then why not? we've proved ourselves against pretty much everyone and won. if not, then yes the aussies should be number 1. Title: thoughts Post by: larwood on Monday, November 21, 2005, 08:49:28 Quote I'd trade an Ashes victory over a win in Pakistan anyday Yes,yes,yes.I think we would all agree with that. :agree: Beating the convicts in the Ashes for the first time in 18 years or beating Pakistan,no contest over which thing is preferable. Title: thoughts Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Monday, November 21, 2005, 08:57:04 Quote from: "Boeta" KP and Bell will the biggest international batsmen for the next five years. the new lara and dravid if you will i agree 100%! give them time and they will be world class players Title: thoughts Post by: larwood on Monday, November 21, 2005, 09:07:54 Quote give them time and they will be world class players True,[although i'm not sure about the Lara and Dravid comparison].I think too often in the past we haven't given players a chance to prove themselves,with the contract system, players must feel a lot more comfortable and less under pressure. Title: thoughts Post by: Boeta on Sunday, November 27, 2005, 02:06:17 Quote from: "Boeta" KP and Bell will the biggest international batsmen for the next five years. the new lara and dravid if you will These boys just keep proving me right - sheer gold. |