Thetownend.com

80% => The Nevillew General Discussion Forum => Topic started by: tans on Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 10:18:08



Title: Bob Crow
Post by: tans on Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 10:18:08
Died.



Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Honkytonk on Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 10:35:19
I'd like to say I had respect for him, but having ten million in property whilst living in a state-subsidised council house and campaigning for the 'poor man' always struck me as a tad hypocritical.

I hope he rests in peace, but the bugger's probably still planning the next tube strike from beyond the grave.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Arriba on Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 10:53:44
Did a cracking job for those he represented.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Abrahammer on Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 11:10:19
Hopefully someone who deserves it will get that house now


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: suttonred on Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 11:37:31
Go to Sheryl wont it?


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Paolo69 on Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 11:58:02
Go to Sheryl wont it?

Bet it feels like home.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Honkytonk on Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 12:04:17
Did a cracking job for those he represented.

Oh definitely, not going to argue that. Did his job very well.


Title: Re:
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 12:08:33
Sad when anyone dies. Can't stand his unions viewpoints though.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Bob's Orange on Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 12:10:18
Go to Sheryl wont it?

If it makes her happy I guess.


Title: Re:
Post by: otanswell on Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 12:18:50
Good riddance


Title: Re:
Post by: Arriba on Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 12:40:18
Sad when anyone dies. Can't stand his unions viewpoints though.
which ones?
Good riddance
why?


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: tans on Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 12:46:45
why?

Because the tube strikes made his journey into work a couple of hours longer i expect


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: horlock07 on Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 13:11:52
I don't really have an opinion regarding this at the moment, I will wait until someone with a left leaning chip on their shoulder tells me what to think via social media, supported by a link to a Guardian story confirming that if I don't agree I must be the right wing devil.

I consider myself left leaning, but the left (or at least those I engage with) seem to be becoming ever more tedious in their approach at the moment!

I will miss Bob Crow if only for his comedy interviews with Peter Allen on Fivelive...


Title: Re:
Post by: otanswell on Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 13:17:42
He was a fucking cock, strike this strike that, surprised noone striked him in the face

And Boris fake grief is a piss take, he hated him


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Barry Scott on Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 13:20:50
I don't really have an opinion regarding this at the moment, I will wait until someone with a left leaning chip on their shoulder tells me what to think via social media, supported by a link to a Guardian story confirming that if I don't agree I must be the right wing devil.

I consider myself left leaning, but the left (or at least those I engage with) seem to be becoming ever more tedious in their approach at the moment!

I will miss Bob Crow if only for his comedy interviews with Peter Allen on Fivelive...

Never heard of the bloke, but the rest of what you say is sadly indicative of the way things seem to be amongst the majority of "knowledgable" people I know.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Flashheart on Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 13:41:21
A lot of lefties become so far left in their leftiness that they forget they're lefties and become intolerant, self-righteous righties.

Oh, and I've never heard of Bob Crowe either.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Saxondale on Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 13:50:40
Anyone who fucks off Boris and Cameron cant be all bad.  RIP.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: @MacPhlea on Tuesday, March 11, 2014, 15:37:28
He was a fucking cock, strike this strike that, surprised noone striked him in the face

And Boris fake grief is a piss take, he hated him

Struck, it's struck!


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: mexico red on Wednesday, March 12, 2014, 01:40:03
Im a leftie and I liked him. His job was to represent the workers in his union, getting them better pay and better working conditions. He did his job well. Very well. RIP.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Levi lapper on Wednesday, March 12, 2014, 12:17:54
The irony of some of you having a pop at Union leaders, without them standing up for your ancestors you'd still be chewing straw in a barn eating raw potatoes and being buggered by the local squire. Ignorant Peasants.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, March 12, 2014, 12:27:08
The irony of some of you having a pop at Union leaders, without them standing up for your ancestors you'd still be chewing straw in a barn eating raw potatoes and being buggered by the local squire. Ignorant Peasants.

Unfortunately, many of today's younger generation assume, that their relatively decent working conditions in terms of hours, pay etc came about because of the kindness of owners, bosses and their back-up in the wider establishment.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: pauld on Wednesday, March 12, 2014, 12:37:20
The irony of some of you having a pop at Union leaders, without them standing up for your ancestors you'd still be chewing straw in a barn eating raw potatoes and being buggered by the local squire. Ignorant Peasants.
Erm, you mean we're NOT supposed to still be doing that? Damn.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Levi lapper on Wednesday, March 12, 2014, 12:51:38
Erm, you mean we're NOT supposed to still be doing that? Damn.

It's a lifestyle choice now thankfully. My new book, "the raw potato and buggery by the aristocracy diet" will be in the shops in time for Christmas  :)


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Arriba on Wednesday, March 12, 2014, 13:02:59
Bob crows leadership saw their union double its membership. Says it all really. He negotiated many benefits and improvements during that time. Enough said really.

Look at how we are now going backwards again regarding pay and conditions in the UK. We need unions to grow and fight for their members.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: sheepshagger on Wednesday, March 12, 2014, 13:28:43
Says the leftie......

In my opinion we need to kill off the unions - the faster the better.....

Fuck the unions and their bollocks (I know, well reasoned) -- for the last tube strike only 40% of members bothered to even return their ballot papers - 40% !!!

As an overall organisation 30% of members voted to strike - 70% did not

Apparently according to the unions this is some sort of majority and therefore the strike became legal !

What sort of bollocks is that ? How can 30% voting to strike be any kind of representative majority ?


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: chalkies_shorts on Wednesday, March 12, 2014, 13:29:59
What sort of bollocks is that ? How can 30% voting to strike be any kind of representative majority ?
The same as gets governments elected


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: sheepshagger on Wednesday, March 12, 2014, 13:33:09
Absolutely right Chalkie - that is also a lot of old bollocks !


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, March 12, 2014, 15:00:27
Says the leftie......

In my opinion we need to kill off the unions - the faster the better.....

Fuck the unions and their bollocks (I know, well reasoned) -- for the last tube strike only 40% of members bothered to even return their ballot papers - 40% !!!

As an overall organisation 30% of members voted to strike - 70% did not

Apparently according to the unions this is some sort of majority and therefore the strike became legal !

What sort of bollocks is that ? How can 30% voting to strike be any kind of representative majority ?

In most unions, there'll be people who happily take the benefits, but won't back what is happening. I've seen a few down the years...cunts.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Wednesday, March 12, 2014, 16:51:50
In most unions, there'll be people who happily take the benefits, but won't back what is happening. I've seen a few down the years...cunts.

Better those those who don't join the union and still get all the benefits.


Title: Re: Re: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: herthab on Wednesday, March 12, 2014, 19:05:38
Says the leftie......

In my opinion we need to kill off the unions - the faster the better.....

Fuck the unions and their bollocks (I know, well reasoned) -- for the last tube strike only 40% of members bothered to even return their ballot papers - 40% !!!

As an overall organisation 30% of members voted to strike - 70% did not

Apparently according to the unions this is some sort of majority and therefore the strike became legal !

What sort of bollocks is that ? How can 30% voting to strike be any kind of representative majority ?
Are you saying that 75% of those who bothered to vote voted to strike?
I'm no leftie, but unions have a place.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: sheepshagger on Wednesday, March 12, 2014, 19:39:13
Yeah I am saying that - which is piss poor as overall 30% of the workforce "could be bothered"

The other 70% obviously couldn't give a shit

That's what makes unions out of date and fucking pointless......


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Levi lapper on Wednesday, March 12, 2014, 22:04:54
Yeah zero hours contracts for all. Zero pay rises for people in The public sector, and million pound bonuses for bankers paid for by the public sector. Who needs unions they are so out of date and pointless. ::)


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Peter Gibbons on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 00:35:30
Yeah zero hours contracts for all. Zero pay rises for people in The public sector, and million pound bonuses for bankers paid for by the public sector. Who needs unions they are so out of date and pointless. ::)

Using Lloyds Banking Group (Accord) and Santander (Advance) as examples, it appears that union membership in banks is around 25%, perhaps they are just doing a very good job for their members ;)


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Cookie on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 07:32:12
The State is busy protecting the banks so no need for unions. The low paid on the other hand do not receive the same kind of state support. 


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Not that Nice If I'm Honest on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 07:35:31
Can't blame him for looking after his members.

But there should be restrictions on what strike action can be taken on a vital piece of infrastructure like the tube.

I also think he used his position to promote/fulfill his out of date political ideals, and the improved benefits for members was a collateral effect.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: sheepshagger on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 09:09:35
Yeah zero hours contracts for all. Zero pay rises for people in The public sector, and million pound bonuses for bankers paid for by the public sector. Who needs unions they are so out of date and pointless. ::)

Fucking hell really ?

You mean that public sector who have been propped up by the private sector for donkey's years ?

That public sector with unrealistic pensions paid out of the private sector ?

Zero pay rises - ahhhhh poor public sector workers ! They should try living in the real world like the rest of us - I would LOVE a pay rise but unfortunately I also understand that when things are bad in the economy I have to suck it up and wait until things improve

And yeah the bankers -- it was ALL their fault that we took more credit than we could afford - fuck me personal responsibility went right out of the window in the Blair/Brown Bust years didn't it......


Title: Re:
Post by: Batch on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 10:01:42
The government were fairly fucked when it came to banks. Very difficult not to have an even worse outcome by letting them go under.

Should they have been allowed to get into that state, regulatory speaking.... thats different argument.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Honkytonk on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 10:51:46
And yeah the bankers -- it was ALL their fault that we took more credit than we could afford - fuck me personal responsibility went right out of the window in the Blair/Brown Bust years didn't it......

Well, to some extent, yes, yes it was. I'm no expert, but it seems to me that lending money to people who can't afford to ever pay it back is not a great way to do business. Especially when the money involved is, at the end of the day, someone else's.

Spending more than the GDP of a small country on bonuses wouldn't exactly help either.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: sheepshagger on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 12:17:24
Well, to some extent, yes, yes it was. I'm no expert, but it seems to me that lending money to people who can't afford to ever pay it back is not a great way to do business. Especially when the money involved is, at the end of the day, someone else's.

Spending more than the GDP of a small country on bonuses wouldn't exactly help either.



And knowingly taking that money from the bank when you know as an individual you cannot afford to pay it back is OK then ?

Of course the banks are at fault as well - I'm not disputing that, but individuals have to take on some responsibility too.....

I think it was the unions we were discussing first though -- and I have to say I see nothing from them which makes me think they are anything more than a complete leech on society....

The NUT are next at it -- poor old teachers having these terrible working conditions forced upon them -- some of the highest paid teachers in Europe that is, you know the ones with really shit holidays as well, not to mention their massive final salary pensions  -- but fuck me they are going on strike ! 

I went to my local school to be told it was IMPERATIVE that my child did not take a day off in years 10 or 11 - or basically the whole world would collapse and implode, and my child would fail their GCSE exams

What do they announce next ?  Oh yeah, fuck your kids -- it's one rule for you, but we do what the fuck we want !  We are going on strike - not during their vast holidays, not during their many Teacher Training Days per year which all seem to always happen on a Friday or a Monday (convenience I'm sure!!), but during the school week, and yeah you all need to take a day off work or make other arrangements and frankly we don't give a shit....

Fucking Unions.............


Title: Re:
Post by: Batch on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 12:28:55
To be fair there are a number of union teachers that voted against and ignored industrial action.

What gets me is that they aren't obliged to let the school know they are striking until the actual day of the strike. How is a school supposed to plan properly, which the unions will argue is the whole point. In fact the silly bint NASWUT rep was actively encouraging members to do just that. Max disruption, Fuck everyone else as long as we get what we want.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: chalkies_shorts on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 12:41:19
Strikes are a pain in the bum but thats all - nobody dies. If they didn't cause disruption there's no point doing it. I'm a member of a union and proud of it. They do more good than bad but don't always get it right. It would be a hell of a worse world if they didn''t exist.
They're not all about strikes. The individual representation they provide is very important and the general advise they give their members is often invaluable. 


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Anteater on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 12:50:48
Fucking hell really ?

You mean that public sector who have been propped up by the private sector for donkey's years ?

That public sector with unrealistic pensions paid out of the private sector ?

Zero pay rises - ahhhhh poor public sector workers ! They should try living in the real world like the rest of us - I would LOVE a pay rise but unfortunately I also understand that when things are bad in the economy I have to suck it up and wait until things improve
Glad you're so very sympathetic !  ::)

I work in the public sector and last year had my first rise 1% for 3 years (before that 5 years of low rises all below inflation rate), arguably not  a rise in real terms, looks like 1% this year (whoopee) and bonus related earnings irrespective of how well personally I have performed do not exist in my area.
I knew this when I started working in the public sector and have not winged or ever gone on strike as a result but I would like to think I 'live in the real world' along with you. I know I also have to 'suck it up' as have some friends that are now out of work due to cuts. Not all people that are members of a union are Bob Crow clones.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: sheepshagger on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 12:51:26
Chalkie I get that, but how much of that advice is ultimately for their own devices ?

I'm not saying it all is, and I am sure there is some good in the workplace for representation to the management

But unfortunately the way they go about things (striking in particular) is going to get on a lot of peoples tits (mine included as you may have guessed)

I think it's just plain wrong to A. basically bring the Capitol City to a grinding halt when only 30% of the workforce voted for it and B. Be complete hypocrites when it comes to kids education and stick two fingers up to all the hard working parents who have to make alternative arrangements and screw their working day up, when let's face it they haven't got it bad at all !!


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: fuzzy on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 12:58:47
Fucking hell really ?

You mean that public sector who have been propped up by the private sector for donkey's years ?

That public sector with unrealistic pensions paid out of the private sector ?

Zero pay rises - ahhhhh poor public sector workers ! They should try living in the real world like the rest of us - I would LOVE a pay rise but unfortunately I also understand that when things are bad in the economy I have to suck it up and wait until things improve

And yeah the bankers -- it was ALL their fault that we took more credit than we could afford - fuck me personal responsibility went right out of the window in the Blair/Brown Bust years didn't it......
I've got one of those supposedly magic pensions. I started paying my pension 26 years ago at 11% of my salary. It slowly went up to 13.75%. I am about to start paying 14% of my salary for the privilege. Thats 14% of my hard earned before I even get a sniff of it. Then the Gubbinsment take a not insignificant slice. The rises in my pension contributions have outpaced my pay increase so I am actually worse off than before the crash. Just like everyone else but the Bankers and the Grand High Fucky Mucks so, fuck off with all your bitter bollocks about public sector pensions. The teachers final salaray pension- what final salary is that based on then? Head Teachers and the like may have a good final salary but, your average teachers isn't paid a shitload.

Your average public sector worker spends their life being paid not a fantastic wage but contributing a good proportion of their income for a pension so that they can be comfortable in retirement. What the fuck is wrong with that?


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: sheepshagger on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 13:00:46
Glad you're so very sympathetic !  ::)

I work in the public sector and last year had my first rise 1% for 3 years (before that 5 years of low rises all below inflation rate), arguably not  a rise in real terms, looks like 1% this year (whoopee) and bonus related earnings irrespective of how well personally I have performed do not exist in my area.
I knew this when I started working in the public sector and have not winged or ever gone on strike as a result but I would like to think I 'live in the real world' along with you. I know I also have to 'suck it up' as have some friends that are now out of work due to cuts. Not all people that are members of a union are Bob Crow clones.

Sorry but I'm not very sympathetic and won't be......

It was under labours watch that all this shit happened - I'm not saying it's all their fault but they did largely fuck all about it until it was too late, and they sold off the Crown Jewels in the process (gold reserves being a biggy)

The public sector is just too big and too expensive - it's bloated and needs to be cut - that is unfortunately the real world.  Hopefully when that has been tackled and the economy is on a better footing people will be able to achieve higher than inflation pay rises because there will be fewer people to pay.

The unfortunate truth is that under labour, half the jobs created in the uk were publics sector ones - given that the public sector employs around 6million people and the private sector employs around 23million people it might be understandable to see why the public sector is now a little bit bloated, and therefore it's pretty hard to increase the pay.....


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: chalkies_shorts on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 13:03:54
Chalkie I get that, but how much of that advice is ultimately for their own devices ?

probably a lesser percentage than big business bash them for their own devices. The simple fact is that Unions would not need to exist if businesses conducted themseves more ethically. Good old Arthur got a hell of al ot of stick for the miners strikes but documents are now being uncovered that showed he was right and Thatcher was totally dishonest. 


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: sheepshagger on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 13:07:20
I've got one of those supposedly magic pensions. I started paying my pension 26 years ago at 11% of my salary. It slowly went up to 13.75%. I am about to start paying 14% of my salary for the privilege. Thats 14% of my hard earned before I even get a sniff of it. Then the Gubbinsment take a not insignificant slice. The rises in my pension contributions have outpaced my pay increase so I am actually worse off than before the crash. Just like everyone else but the Bankers and the Grand High Fucky Mucks so, fuck off with all your bitter bollocks about public sector pensions. The teachers final salaray pension- what final salary is that based on then? Head Teachers and the like may have a good final salary but, your average teachers isn't paid a shitload.

Your average public sector worker spends their life being paid not a fantastic wage but contributing a good proportion of their income for a pension so that they can be comfortable in retirement. What the fuck is wrong with that?

Nothing wrong with it at all Fuzzy, and fair play to you and anyone else who has that luxury.  I'm not bitter at all about it - traditionally public sector workers choose to be paid a little less than private sector in real cash, which is made up by decent pensions/benefits etc.....

I have no problem with any of that

I have a problem when the whinging starts and the strikes happen and fuck everyone else around when it is completely unnecessary and in my opinion greedy.  Teachers are paid better in the uk than most other European countries, and also have better pensions than most, not to mention fucking long holidays etc..... Again I have no problem with that and would happily pay a little more income tax in order to pay for the best teachers we can get, thereby giving our next generation a better chance in life - what I don't like is as I said before, the unnecessary strikes and hypocrites


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Arriba on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 13:10:12
Asking people to strike on their days off is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever read.
Teachers work very hard and under pressure. Those who strike do not make the rules on taking kids out during term time either. Those rules come from above.

I needed my union when somebody fell from my lorry. I was blameless and followed correct procedure yet an attempt was made to make me the scapegoat. Without my unions help they may have got away with it.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Honkytonk on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 13:14:44
You are essentially tarring everyone with the same brush. Is it our collective responsibility to ensure the banks don't give that bloke just above the poverty line a loan? Everyone is within their rights to ask for a loan, and it's the bank's duty to tell them 'no, you can't afford it.'

By that reasoning it's the individual's fault for the economic crisis occuring- whether they took out a sub-prime loan or not. Which is obviously patent bollocks, no offence. Institutional atmospheres of an obsession with income over sustainability and stability, and, frankly, the general selfishness of people, is the main cause.

Absolving the cunts at the top of blame because Joe Average wants a house is utterly wrong.

Unions are great. Strikes are supposed to cause annoyance. That is, after all their purpose.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Pete on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 13:21:51
RIP Bob. Did a great job for his RMT members.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: fuzzy on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 13:22:45
Nothing wrong with it at all Fuzzy, and fair play to you and anyone else who has that luxury.  I'm not bitter at all about it - traditionally public sector workers choose to be paid a little less than private sector in real cash, which is made up by decent pensions/benefits etc.....

I have no problem with any of that

I have a problem when the whinging starts and the strikes happen and fuck everyone else around when it is completely unnecessary and in my opinion greedy.  Teachers are paid better in the uk than most other European countries, and also have better pensions than most, not to mention fucking long holidays etc..... Again I have no problem with that and would happily pay a little more income tax in order to pay for the best teachers we can get, thereby giving our next generation a better chance in life - what I don't like is as I said before, the unnecessary strikes and hypocrites

The strikes aren't always about pay and conditions though are they? Teachers sometimes strike as the only way to protest about the next big fuckwit generated edict from Gubbinsment. All those smart ideas about making your foetus sit an exam to see just how wekll it is learning to shit on a potty instead of a nappy. Ideas spawned by 'experts' who have been about as close to teaching as I have to being an astronaut. They are striking to try and protect the future of their chatges.

Many a public sector job was easy to do before Gubbinsment started sticking their oar in and fucking thisng up. Unions have a place and it isn't always to call a strike to get their members better pay.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: sheepshagger on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 13:27:51
The strikes aren't always about pay and conditions though are they? Teachers sometimes strike as the only way to protest about the next big fuckwit generated edict from Gubbinsment. All those smart ideas about making your foetus sit an exam to see just how wekll it is learning to shit on a potty instead of a nappy. Ideas spawned by 'experts' who have been about as close to teaching as I have to being an astronaut. They are striking to try and protect the future of their chatges.

Many a public sector job was easy to do before Gubbinsment started sticking their oar in and fucking thisng up. Unions have a place and it isn't always to call a strike to get their members better pay.

You might be right Fuzzy - unfortunately I have only really commented about 2 strikes, one of which is to do with teachers and hasn't even happened yet - the reason for the strike ?  Pay and pensions !!!!!

I am sure the unions do some things well, and in earlier posts I have completely acknowledged that.  My "beef" is the way they are hypocritical and the way they go about strikes.

No-one can tell me that 30% of a workforce voting to strike should be a good enough figure to gridlock a city like London

No-one can tell me that it's fair for me to be told "don't you dare let your child miss one day of school in years 10 and 11, it's just too important", and then go on fucking strike over pay and pensions and do exactly what they have told me shouldn't be done !!!


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: sheepshagger on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 13:32:41
You are essentially tarring everyone with the same brush. Is it our collective responsibility to ensure the banks don't give that bloke just above the poverty line a loan? Everyone is within their rights to ask for a loan, and it's the bank's duty to tell them 'no, you can't afford it.'

By that reasoning it's the individual's fault for the economic crisis occuring- whether they took out a sub-prime loan or not. Which is obviously patent bollocks, no offence. Institutional atmospheres of an obsession with income over sustainability and stability, and, frankly, the general selfishness of people, is the main cause.

Absolving the cunts at the top of blame because Joe Average wants a house is utterly wrong.

Unions are great. Strikes are supposed to cause annoyance. That is, after all their purpose.

No I'm not, not at all !  It is AS MUCH the individuals responsibility to know whether he/she can afford to take out a loan as it is the banks for giving it to them.  Unless we take some responsibility ourselves we are fucked - do we want the "nanny state" to take care of everything for us ?  Should I get them round to wipe my arse ?

No offense taken as it is not what I said at all - I said the individual has to take responsibility, I never once said the individual caused the economic crisis.  I believe that was down to a lot of things, but mainly (world wide) banks being greedy cunts and (locally) a bit of the same plus Blair/Brown being fucking clueless and toothless.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: sheepshagger on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 13:35:46
Asking people to strike on their days off is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever read.
Teachers work very hard and under pressure. Those who strike do not make the rules on taking kids out during term time either. Those rules come from above.

I needed my union when somebody fell from my lorry. I was blameless and followed correct procedure yet an attempt was made to make me the scapegoat. Without my unions help they may have got away with it.

I'm not asking people to strike on their day off - I am asking for them to be consistent - if they sit there in front of 300 people and tell them something and how important it is, I expect them to at least work on the same principle - I don't think that's too much to ask personally.

I also know they work hard, but I believe they are paid well for it with a LOT of benefits and perks thrown in.  I don't believe they have any reason at all to strike, and I don't think the general public is going to have much sympathy for them.....


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: fuzzy on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 13:51:25
The striking teachers are not telling you you can't take your child on holiday in term time. They are enforcing rules foisted on them by the Department for Education.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: sheepshagger on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 15:03:42
The striking teachers are not telling you you can't take your child on holiday in term time. They are enforcing rules foisted on them by the Department for Education.

I didn't say they were ?  I am not talking about holidays in term time

I am talking about them telling me it is imperative that my child attends EVERY DAY during years 10 and 11, and that even 1 day out can cause problems with their GCSE's - a point made very clear to all parents of my child's school by the head, the year head and the tutor on separate occasions

Wouldn't you say it was fucking hypocritical to say this and then go on strike during term time, exactly the opposite of what they are telling parents is SO important ?


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: fuzzy on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 15:11:04
I didn't say they were ?  I am not talking about holidays in term time

I am talking about them telling me it is imperative that my child attends EVERY DAY during years 10 and 11, and that even 1 day out can cause problems with their GCSE's - a point made very clear to all parents of my child's school by the head, the year head and the tutor on separate occasions

Wouldn't you say it was fucking hypocritical to say this and then go on strike during term time, exactly the opposite of what they are telling parents is SO important ?

If your child misses a day in years 10 and/ or 11 whilst the others are in lessons, only YOUR child will be disadvantaged. If ALL children miss a day during years 10/ 11 then the teaching staff will structure things so the class as a whole makes up the missed study.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: sheepshagger on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 15:15:35
If your child misses a day in years 10 and/ or 11 whilst the others are in lessons, only YOUR child will be disadvantaged. If ALL children miss a day during years 10/ 11 then the teaching staff will structure things so the class as a whole makes up the missed study.

Well fuck it then, why don't they go down to a 4 day week if everything will just be OK !

Why should my child miss out on a days education because the teachers are upset about pay and pensions -- that's right the teachers whose wages I help to pay ?

Why should my child then have to do extra to "catch up" on something they didn't want to miss in the first place but had no choice ?

This is where the unions are wrong and completely unhelpful


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: fuzzy on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 15:35:46
What else are they supposed to do then? Just suck it up and take a shafting?

I know, you have alluded that we are in difficult times and we are all supposed to be in this together and I agree. However, the problem with being a Public Service emplyee is, employers don't negotiate too well. Without industrial action, the shafting would happen on a regular basis and the public service employee would be treated more like shit than some of us already are.

Just so that you know, I am NOT a union member. I am not allowed to be. I often wish I could be.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: sheepshagger on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 16:21:50
Suck what up ?

Take what shafting ?

Teachers in the UK are amongst the highest paid teachers in Europe - full stop !

Teachers have more holidays than any other profession - full stop !

Teachers have great pensions - full stop !

No, what they are supposed to do is get on with their job, and do what they signed up to do !

Has nothing to do with difficult times - they are well paid already !


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 16:34:25
No, what they are supposed to do is get on with their job, and do what they signed up to do !

Unfortunately the government unilaterally changed the goalposts on what teachers signed up for without asking....I'm sure all teachers would happily get on with doing what they signed up for...


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 16:43:04
Unfortunately the government unilaterally changed the goalposts on what teachers signed up for without asking....I'm sure all teachers would happily get on with doing what they signed up for...

I know this is a thread about unions rather than pensions, but this argument of "it's not what I signed up for" often crops up when discussing public sector pensions.

Yes it's unfortunate that you and everyone else in the public & civil service have to pay more into your pensions to get the same, or less, income at the end of it. But it's really not a lot different from the private sector.

Annuity rates have bombed due to falling gilt yields and improved mortality, which means we all have to pay more into pensions to get the same income at the end because statistics show we're much more likely to be paid that pension for an extra 5 or 10 years than was expected when you started contributing to it. That extra 5 or 10 years worth of income has to be paid for somewhere, or you have to accept a lower income in retirement.

Public sector pensions are unfunded, there is no pot of money, the government effectively dips directly into the public purse to pay them. And for the same reason of everybody living longer, you can't expect the promise of more income for longer without contributing something toward it.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 16:49:21
I know this is a thread about unions rather than pensions, but this argument of "it's not what I signed up for" often crops up when discussing public sector pensions.

Yes it's unfortunate that you and everyone else in the public & civil service have to pay more into your pensions to get the same, or less, income at the end of it. But it's really not a lot different from the private sector.

Annuity rates have bombed due to falling gilt yields and improved mortality, which means we all have to pay more into pensions to get the same income at the end because statistics show we're much more likely to be paid that pension for an extra 5 or 10 years than was expected when you started contributing to it. That extra 5 or 10 years worth of income has to be paid for somewhere, or you have to accept a lower income in retirement.

Public sector pensions are unfunded, there is no pot of money, the government effectively dips directly into the public purse to pay them. And for the same reason of everybody living longer, you can't expect the promise of more income for longer without contributing something toward it.

Yes very inconvenient of people to live longer...what's needed is a good war or plague or something.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 16:54:45
I know this is a thread about unions rather than pensions, but this argument of "it's not what I signed up for" often crops up when discussing public sector pensions.

Yes it's unfortunate that you and everyone else in the public & civil service have to pay more into your pensions to get the same, or less, income at the end of it. But it's really not a lot different from the private sector.

Annuity rates have bombed due to falling gilt yields and improved mortality, which means we all have to pay more into pensions to get the same income at the end because statistics show we're much more likely to be paid that pension for an extra 5 or 10 years than was expected when you started contributing to it. That extra 5 or 10 years worth of income has to be paid for somewhere, or you have to accept a lower income in retirement.

Public sector pensions are unfunded, there is no pot of money, the government effectively dips directly into the public purse to pay them. And for the same reason of everybody living longer, you can't expect the promise of more income for longer without contributing something toward it.

So if you sign a legal contract stating you pay in x and they pay in y and then y decide to change the ratios you just accept it? Fuck that.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 16:55:09
Although I agree with your broader point.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Levi lapper on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 17:33:50
Fucking hell really ?

You mean that public sector who have been propped up by the private sector for donkey's years ?

That public sector with unrealistic pensions paid out of the private sector ?

Zero pay rises - ahhhhh poor public sector workers ! They should try living in the real world like the rest of us - I would LOVE a pay rise but unfortunately I also understand that when things are bad in the economy I have to suck it up and wait until things improve

And yeah the bankers -- it was ALL their fault that we took more credit than we could afford - fuck me personal responsibility went right out of the window in the Blair/Brown Bust years didn't it......

I guess you'd prefer to live in a world without the public sector, so no doctors, teachers, firemen, ambulance drivers or armed forces but a nation of double glazing salesmen and photo copier engineers. Unbelievable.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Not that Nice If I'm Honest on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 17:44:33
Asking people to strike on their days off is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever read.
Teachers work very hard and under pressure. Those who strike do not make the rules on taking kids out during term time either. Those rules come from above.

I needed my union when somebody fell from my lorry. I was blameless and followed correct procedure yet an attempt was made to make me the scapegoat. Without my unions help they may have got away with it.

You shouldn't have been people smuggling in the first place


Title: Re:
Post by: sonicyouth on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 18:20:47
RIP Bob Crow.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: tans on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 18:26:01
So if you sign a legal contract stating you pay in x and they pay in y and then y decide to change the ratios you just accept it? Fuck that.

Spot on


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Talk Talk on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 19:00:08
I guess you'd prefer to live in a world without the public sector, so no doctors, teachers, firemen, ambulance drivers or armed forces but a nation of double glazing salesmen and photo copier engineers. Unbelievable.

I just can't resist.

Why do these services have to be provided by the public sector? If I had the choice of not paying taxes, or so much tax I would be more than delirious to source all of these through private companies competing against each other for my custom. They are currently monopolies and as such are as bad as private sector monopolies. You get bloated inefficient manager heavy unionised crap organisations with rubbish service because there is no competition whatsoever.

And before I get all of the bollocks about "what about the poor, the sick, the starving" and so on, they were more than adequately looked after by charity and the benevolence of the better off before the state decided to fuck it all up.

As for unions. Well, how much penetration have the unions got in the private sector? About 5%? Why is that then? Because they are not required. Sure, staff should be free to organise collective bargaining if they want to do that, but go on strike or push for stupid pay and conditions increases then the business will go under because costs will go up. Everybody who is in business or works in a company knows this. The difference in the public sector is that there are no other option for the consumer. Also, if you don't like your private sector job, it is a lot easier to go and get a different one somewhere else as living in the real world gives you real world skills, motivation and experience. A public to private move? Good luck with that one, I wouldn't employ you.

As a contractor I have worked for police forces, universities, colleges, schools, local government, blue chip companies, global companies, medium sized businesses and so on. From my experience if you want a job doing mainly fuck all every day at the taxpayers' expense, get a job in the public sector.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Batch on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 19:12:54
Talk talk had exactly the opposite opinion I'd thought he's have when I saw he'd posted.

Not quite sure I'd agree public sector workers do fuck all, but they've had it good for ages. Things like pensions, well I can see why the unions kick off as the Government issues takebacks, but sympathy ends when the "its not what I signed up for" argument kicks in. Of course it isn't, but its certainly no worse than the final salary abolition and miser amounts private sector often pays. So my sympathy is very thin.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: kerry red on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 19:13:53
You're all either commie bedwetters or right wing scum.

Can't see why some bloke who dies that a very few people have heard of merits a thread.

Fuck 'em all


Title: Re:
Post by: otanswell on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 19:48:28
soapy tit wank


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Samdy Gray on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 19:58:00
So if you sign a legal contract stating you pay in x and they pay in y and then y decide to change the ratios you just accept it? Fuck that.

Pretty much, yes.

There's not much difference between that and, say, me putting £200 per month into my pension expecting a future annuity of £10,000 per year only to then have to put my contribution up to £400 per month to get that same £10,000 per year.

It's still a contract, if you want to get pedantic about it...


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: 4D on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 20:02:45
I'd not heard of this fella until it was posted on here. Not interested in politics,  not interested in watching the news as it's mostly depressing.


Title: Re: Re: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: herthab on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 20:10:14
I just can't resist.

And before I get all of the bollocks about "what about the poor, the sick, the starving" and so on, they were more than adequately looked after by charity and the benevolence of the better off before the state decided to fuck it all up.
What utter bollocks. Look at the US for an example of how well the poor, sick & starving are 'looked after' without a welfare state.


Title: Re: Re: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Talk Talk on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 20:16:22
What utter bollocks. Look at the US for an example of how well the poor, sick & starving are 'looked after' without a welfare state.

Utter bollocks back in your face Steve. Have you never heard of food stamps? Medicare? Medicaid? The US have a huge welfare state.

Try http://demonocracy.info/infographics/usa/food_stamps/food_stamp_nation-SNAP.html (http://demonocracy.info/infographics/usa/food_stamps/food_stamp_nation-SNAP.html) for a start.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, March 13, 2014, 21:19:41
I'd not heard of this fella until it was posted on here. Not interested in politics,  not interested in watching the news as it's mostly depressing.

Well you've learned something today 4D....the teachers on here will be proud  :)


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: ron dodgers on Friday, March 14, 2014, 01:44:35


Teachers in the UK are amongst the highest paid teachers in Europe - full stop !


have a look at he OECD report from 2012 - they're not that well paid
http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/teachers-salaries_teachsal-table-en


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Friday, March 14, 2014, 08:28:19
Pretty much, yes.

There's not much difference between that and, say, me putting £200 per month into my pension expecting a future annuity of £10,000 per year only to then have to put my contribution up to £400 per month to get that same £10,000 per year.

It's still a contract, if you want to get pedantic about it...

More fool you then.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, March 14, 2014, 09:49:25
have a look at he OECD report from 2012 - they're not that well paid
http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/teachers-salaries_teachsal-table-en

I wonder how that correlates with the recent OECD literacy and numeracy tables for young adults, where England is in the relegation zone...

Quote
Numeracy test 16 to 24-year-olds

Netherlands
Finland
Japan
Flanders (Belgium)
South Korea
Austria
Estonia
Sweden
Czech Republic
Slovak Republic
Germany
Denmark
Norway
Australia
Poland
Canada
Cyprus
Northern Ireland
France
Ireland
England
Spain
Italy
United States
Source: OECD Survey of Adult Skills 2013


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Talk Talk on Friday, March 14, 2014, 10:46:09
I wonder how that correlates with the recent OECD literacy and numeracy tables for young adults, where England is in the relegation zone...

It doesn't. League table figures for 15 year service primary school teachers in equivalent US dollars.

Netherlands           52,292    1
Finland      37,886    2
Japan              45,741    3
Belgium (Fr.)   44,407    4
Korea              48,251    5
Austria      41,633    6
Estonia      12,306    7
Sweden      34,387    8
Czech Republic   20,185    9
Slovak Republic   12,858    10
Germany      58,662    11
Denmark      50,332    12
Norway      37,585    13
Australia           48,522    14
Poland      16,506    15
Canada      56,349    16
France      33,152    19
Ireland      54,954    20
England      44,269    21
Spain              41,339    22
Italy              32,969    23
United States   46,130    24

The average of those 22 countries is $39,578 so English teachers are paid 12% above that and are still in the bottom four.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: fuzzy on Friday, March 14, 2014, 11:02:49
How many of those countries leave their teachers to get on with their jobs?

How many of those countries inflict interfering beuracracy on their teachers?

How does that effect the table?


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, March 14, 2014, 11:12:06
It doesn't. League table figures for 15 year service primary school teachers in equivalent US dollars.

Netherlands           52,292    1
Finland      37,886    2
Japan              45,741    3
Belgium (Fr.)   44,407    4
Korea              48,251    5
Austria      41,633    6
Estonia      12,306    7
Sweden      34,387    8
Czech Republic   20,185    9
Slovak Republic   12,858    10
Germany      58,662    11
Denmark      50,332    12
Norway      37,585    13
Australia           48,522    14
Poland      16,506    15
Canada      56,349    16
France      33,152    19
Ireland      54,954    20
England      44,269    21
Spain              41,339    22
Italy              32,969    23
United States   46,130    24

The average of those 22 countries is $39,578 so English teachers are paid 12% above that and are still in the bottom four.

I suspected it wouldn't, based on the most cursory of glances.... has Gove had the vote of confidence yet?

It's interesting that although the US is at the foot of this table, it is massively out front in the 2013 top 100 univs table...

Quote
2013 Rank


1       Harvard University    US
2       Massachusetts Institute of Technology    US
3       University of Cambridge    UK
4        University of Oxford    UK
5        University of California, Berkeley    US
6        Stanford University    US
7        Princeton University    US
8        University of California, Los Angeles    US
9        University of Tokyo    Japan
10        Yale University    US
11        California Institute of Technology    US
12        University of Michigan    US
13        Columbia University    US
14        University of Chicago    US
14       Imperial College London    UK
16        University of Toronto    Canada
17        Cornell University    US
18       University of Pennsylvania    US
19        Johns Hopkins University    US
20        University College London    UK
20        Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich    Switzerland
22        National University of Singapore    Singapore
23        Kyoto University    Japan
24        University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign    US
25       London School of Economics and Political Science    UK
26        Carnegie Mellon University    US
27       University of Texas at Austin    US
27        University of Washington    US
29        New York University    US
30        University of Wisconsin-Madison    US
31       University of British Columbia    Canada
31       Duke University    US
31       McGill University    Canada
34        University of California, San Diego    US
35       Tsinghua University    China
36       The University of Hong Kong    Hong Kong
37        Northwestern University    US
38        Georgia Institute of Technology    US
39        University of Melbourne    Australia
40       University of California, San Francisco    US
41       Seoul National University    Korea, Republic Of
42       Australian National University    Australia
42       University of Massachusetts    US
44       Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München    Germany
45        Peking University    China
46       University of Edinburgh    UK
47       University of Manchester    UK
48        University of California, Davis    US
49       The University of Sydney    Australia
50        Lomonosov Moscow State University    Russian Federation
50        Purdue University    US
51-60        Delft University of Technology    Netherlands
51-60       École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne    Switzerland
51-60        Middle East Technical University    Turkey
51-60       University of Minnesota    US
51-60        University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill    US
51-60        The Ohio State University    US
51-60            Osaka University    Japan
51-60        Pennsylvania State University    US
51-60        University of California, Santa Barbara    US
51-60        National Taiwan University    Taiwan
61-70        The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology    Hong Kong
61-70        Karolinska Institute    Sweden
61-70            King's College London    UK
61-70       Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology    Korea, Republic Of
61-70            Leiden University    Netherlands
61-70        University of São Paolo    Brazil
61-70        University of Southern California    US
61-70        Technische Universität München    Germany
61-70        Tohoku University    Japan
61-70            Tokyo Institute of Technology    Japan
71-80        Hebrew University of Jerusalem    Israel
71-80        Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin    Germany
71-80        Katholieke Universiteit Leuven    Belgium
71-80         Michigan State University    US
71-80            Nanyang Technological University    Singapore
71-80        Université Paris-Sorbonne    France
71-80        University of Pittsburgh    US
71-80        The University of Queensland Australia    Australia
71-80        Universität Heidelberg    Germany
81-90        University of Amsterdam    Netherlands
81-90        Boston University    US
81-90        Brown University    US
81-90        The Chinese University of Hong Kong    Hong Kong
81-90        École Polytechnique    France
81-90       University of Florida    US
81-90        The University of New South Wales    Australia
81-90        Université Pierre et Marie Curie    France
81-90        Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey    US
81-90        Utrecht University    Netherlands
81-90        Washington University in St Louis    US
91-100    University of Bristol    UK
91-100    Freie Universität Berlin    Germany
91-100    Lund University    Sweden
91-100    University of Maryland, College Park    US
91-100    Monash University    Australia
91-100   Université Paris-Sud    France
91-100    Texas A&M University    US
91-100    Uppsala University    Sweden
91-100    Wageningen University and Research Center

I was pleased to see my alma mater in the list


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Talk Talk on Friday, March 14, 2014, 11:38:01
I was pleased to see my alma mater in the list

Peking University?


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, March 14, 2014, 12:00:21
Peking University?

Sadly not...although it's good to see they still use the English name.

About 70% of those listed are or were in part of the British Empire...


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: ron dodgers on Friday, March 14, 2014, 14:14:14
University of Fitbirds-Bellbottoms


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Pax Romana on Friday, March 14, 2014, 14:19:47
So if you sign a legal contract stating you pay in x and they pay in y and then y decide to change the ratios you just accept it? Fuck that.
You haven't done.  Nobody has a contract guaranteeing their pension contributions for future years.  It's a non-contracted benefit.  That's why employers can change them going forward.  Your rights for the previous years where you paid in x and they paid in y (or guaranteed y benefits on a final salary scheme) remain untouched.

Once employers finally started doing the sums and realised that pension contributions were nowhere near enough to pay for the benefits guaranteed under a final salary scheme virtually every private employee backed out of them going forward.  Public sector employees have to pay more but still significantly less than what is now recognised as the true cost of those pensions.  Not brilliant but better than their private sector counter-parts.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: ron dodgers on Friday, March 14, 2014, 16:06:00
my pension is pretty gosh darned good so I'm taking it early and becoming a drunk - Nationwide's been a good employer I think they stick in about 21% at the moment to my 7%


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, March 14, 2014, 16:20:29
my pension is pretty gosh darned good so I'm taking it early and becoming a drunk - Nationwide's been a good employer I think they stick in about 21% at the moment to my 7%

A wise move, Nationwide's money will be recycled back into the brewing industry, help create jobs for Eastern European bar maids, and free up a space for a youngster who needs employment.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: ron dodgers on Friday, March 14, 2014, 16:37:07
wouldn't have got that without the Union negotiating such a good deal, happy workers are productive workers. Estonian minge mmmmmmmmmmm nice.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Samdy Gray on Friday, March 14, 2014, 17:59:23
More fool you then.

Yep, more fool me for wanting to be able to afford to retire on a decent income.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Ardiles on Friday, March 14, 2014, 18:43:58
I was pleased to see my alma mater in the list

I'm surprised you had time to go to university in your youth...what, with all that shagging & wenching you had to fit in as well.  Must have been a busy time.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, March 14, 2014, 19:04:12
I'm surprised you had time to go to university in your youth...what, with all that shagging & wenching you had to fit in as well.  Must have been a busy time.

The two were not mutually exclusive...I assume it's still the same today.


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Ardiles on Friday, March 14, 2014, 19:58:20
You are, of course, correct.

Which august seat of learning did you study at, Reg?


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, March 14, 2014, 20:11:44
You are, of course, correct.

Which august seat of learning did you study at, Reg?

I suspect one much lower down the table than yours....


Title: Re: Bob Crow
Post by: janaage on Friday, March 14, 2014, 20:33:35
Yep, more fool me for wanting to be able to afford to retire on a decent income.

When I joined my company one of the attractions was a non-contributory final salary pension. 6 years down the line it became a contributory scheme. What did we do about it, nowt. The effective pay cut was worth it to continue in such a scheme.  If I didn't like it I could have gone money purchase and risk my retirement income, or leave the company. Glad I went along with making the contributions.