|
Title: squad numbers Post by: CARTMAN on Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 11:51:55 3-jack smith
4-nicky nicolau 6-steve jenkins 7-gareth whalley 9-tony thorpe 11-jamie cureton 12-ricky shakes 17-charli comyn platt the rest i think are the same as last year Title: squad numbers Post by: Johno on Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 11:57:14 reeves is 14...roberts is 18...
Title: squad numbers Post by: Johno on Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 11:57:54 jenkins already was 6 wasn't he? ifil is now 5....
Title: squad numbers Post by: CARTMAN on Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 12:09:22 cant remember........its been a long summer :(
Title: squad numbers Post by: kick_ass1987 on Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 12:38:02 So do you think Kingy is trying to say, the players 1-11 are his main players.... which leaves charlie comyn platt, and the chav out, and shakes just mises out.... or do you think its just a number..... because to be honest, his 1 - 11 is a very strong line up, and i wouldnt complain with that:
Rhys Saun Jack Smith Nicky Nicolau Jerel Jenks Gareth Whalley Rory Tony Thorpe Stef and Jamie Cureton now thats not too bad Title: squad numbers Post by: sonicyouth on Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:14:40 How odd, they've switched Reeves and Roberts' numbers? Pook and Lapham have also been given proper squad numbers, possibly an indication of their increased involvement next season.
Title: squad numbers Post by: janaage on Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:16:26 Is Marshy number 69 still? Do you think he'll get a start next season? Seemed to have gone off the boil last year, was impressive in the warm ups the season before last though.
Title: squad numbers Post by: sonicyouth on Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:17:17 he wasn't there last season was he?
Title: squad numbers Post by: janaage on Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:19:11 Must have been long term injured.
Title: squad numbers Post by: kaufman on Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:21:31 someone said that roberts played with that number at bristol city so he prefers it !
if it makes him play better then fair enough! Title: squad numbers Post by: @MacPhlea on Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:31:12 14 is always jinxed (unless you're Thiery Henry of course) which is why Reeves has ow got it because he is unlikely to feature much next year
Title: squad numbers Post by: Ben Wah Balls on Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:42:07 Pook and Lapham have been given squad numbers because they've now signed professional contracts as first team players, last year they were on youth contracts. Caton, Holgate and Wells are still on youth contracts.
Title: squad numbers Post by: faringdingdong on Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 14:20:33 Quote from: "janaage" Is Marshy number 69 still? Do you think he'll get a start next season? Seemed to have gone off the boil last year, was impressive in the warm ups the season before last though. :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:Title: squad numbers Post by: Spud on Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 14:55:47 Quote from: "triseros" 14 is always jinxed (unless you're Thiery Henry of course) which is why Reeves has ow got it because he is unlikely to feature much next year Wooooo Hooooo! :mrgreen: Title: squad numbers Post by: DV on Thursday, July 14, 2005, 10:22:30 1. Evans
2. O'Hanlon 3. Smith 4. Nicolau 5. Ifil 6. Jenkins 7. Whalley 8. Fallon 9. Thorpe 10. Miglioranzi 11. Cureton 12. Shakes 13. Bulman 14. Reeves 15. Nicholas 16. 17. Platt 18. Roberts 19. 20. Is that right? thats off the top of my head....what numbers have Pook & Lapham been given? I know Lapham had 5 last year and Pook 22?! Title: squad numbers Post by: Piemonte on Thursday, July 14, 2005, 10:26:02 Quote from: "DV85" 1. Evans 2. O'Hanlon 3. Smith 4. Nicolau 5. Ifil 6. Jenkins 7. Whalley 8. Fallon 9. Thorpe 10. Miglioranzi 11. Cureton 12. Shakes 13. Bulman 14. Reeves 15. Nicholas 16. 17. Platt 18. Roberts 19. 20. Is that right? thats off the top of my head....what numbers have Pook & Lapham been given? I know Lapham had 5 last year and Pook 22?! When you look at that it shows just how small our squad is. We've got good quality now, looking a little thin on the ground for cover though. Title: squad numbers Post by: janaage on Thursday, July 14, 2005, 10:27:15 We're a lot thinner on the ground now that Howards gone - ba boom!!
Title: squad numbers Post by: hansgruber on Thursday, July 14, 2005, 10:48:18 Still not that deep a squad is it? There'd better be some loan signings along the way or we'll feel the fixture congestion again around Christmas time. Anyone know if they did change the loan rules this season or are they the same as last year?
Title: squad numbers Post by: le god cuervo on Thursday, July 14, 2005, 11:28:48 Quote from: "DV85" 1. Evans 2. O'Hanlon 3. Smith 4. Nicolau 5. Ifil 6. Jenkins 7. Whalley 8. Fallon 9. Thorpe 10. Miglioranzi 11. Cureton 12. Shakes 13. Bulman 14. Reeves 15. Nicholas 16. lapham 17. Platt 18. Roberts 19. pook 20. Is that right? thats off the top of my head....what numbers have Pook & Lapham been given? I know Lapham had 5 last year and Pook 22?! Lapham 16 and Pook 19. Caton, Holgate, Wells etc will probably be given numbers nearer the start of the season after all the permanent signings have been made. As for loan signings i think they can now only be made during the transfer window. Title: squad numbers Post by: hansgruber on Thursday, July 14, 2005, 11:41:23 when's the transfer window these days?
Title: squad numbers Post by: Ben Wah Balls on Thursday, July 14, 2005, 13:01:20 Our squad is pretty much exaxctly the same size it's been at the start of the past two seasons.
19 last year 20 in 2003/2004 Title: squad numbers Post by: Johno on Thursday, July 14, 2005, 15:09:49 yeh you have to remember the likes of caton, wells, holgate...and loan signings. its a good base.
|