|
Title: three into two won't go Post by: DMR on Tuesday, June 21, 2005, 18:50:00 1. Tresco
2. Strauss 3. Vaughan 4. ? 5. ? 6. Freddie 7. Jones Who'd you pick? Got to be Thorpe for his experiences, plus its another leftie. Harsh on Bell, but Pieterson must play. Title: three into two won't go Post by: Boeta on Tuesday, June 21, 2005, 18:50:59 Bell and Pietersen no doubt
Thorpe's gone. Mediocre in South Africa and averaging about 10 in the Championship this year Title: three into two won't go Post by: blinkpip on Tuesday, June 21, 2005, 18:53:32 Vaughan has not exactly done very well lately either.
Title: three into two won't go Post by: DMR on Tuesday, June 21, 2005, 19:01:52 if you're implying what i think you are then you're a spastic
Title: three into two won't go Post by: reeves4england on Tuesday, June 21, 2005, 19:57:43 1. Trescothick
2. Strauss 3. Vaughan 4. Bell 5. Pieterson 6. Freddy 7. Jones 8. Giles 9. Hoggard 10. Lewis? 11. Harminson Title: Re: three into two won't go Post by: sonicyouth on Tuesday, June 21, 2005, 23:28:28 Quote from: "dave_m_russell" 1. Tresco 2. Strauss 3. Vaughan 4. ? 5. ? 6. Freddie 7. Jones Who'd you pick? Got to be Thorpe for his experiences, plus its another leftie. Harsh on Bell, but Pieterson must play. In my extremely limited cricket knowledge I'd stick Pietersen in at four and I can't think of anyone for five, we're so good we don't need a fith batsman 8) Title: three into two won't go Post by: Johno on Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 06:20:22 get rid of Duncan Fletcher and get youth in.... brilliant.
get rid of Thorpe, old, going anyway, not doing that great in the championship so i would rather see Pietersen and Bell. Title: three into two won't go Post by: Gethimout on Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 08:53:40 alright boeta!!! can u guess who this is???
Title: three into two won't go Post by: Boeta on Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 10:24:37 Quote from: "reeves4england" 1. Trescothick 2. Strauss 3. Vaughan 4. Bell 5. Pieterson 6. Freddy 7. Jones 8. Giles 9. Hoggard 10. Lewis? 11. Harminson That side but with Simon Jones at 10. That's a fucking hell of a side. Title: three into two won't go Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, September 14, 2005, 20:21:43 Quote from: "Boeta" Quote from: "reeves4england" 1. Trescothick 2. Strauss 3. Vaughan 4. Bell 5. Pieterson 6. Freddy 7. Jones 8. Giles 9. Hoggard 10. Lewis? 11. Harminson That side but with Simon Jones at 10. That's a fucking hell of a side. The boy was right..... Title: three into two won't go Post by: Boeta on Wednesday, September 14, 2005, 22:17:35 Course I was. 8)
Title: Re: three into two won't go Post by: Spud on Thursday, September 15, 2005, 04:34:52 Quote from: "dave_m_russell" 1. Tresco 2. Strauss 3. Vaughan 4. ? 5. ? 6. Freddie 7. Jones Who'd you pick? Got to be Thorpe for his experiences, plus its another leftie. Harsh on Bell, but Pieterson must play. Thorpe has actually retired. :roll: Title: Re: three into two won't go Post by: DiV on Thursday, September 15, 2005, 10:33:46 Quote from: "Spuddy_STFC" Quote from: "dave_m_russell" 1. Tresco 2. Strauss 3. Vaughan 4. ? 5. ? 6. Freddie 7. Jones Who'd you pick? Got to be Thorpe for his experiences, plus its another leftie. Harsh on Bell, but Pieterson must play. Thorpe has actually retired. :roll: not when this post was made he wasnt....! Title: three into two won't go Post by: Spud on Thursday, September 15, 2005, 14:20:37 Sorry i didnt look at the date, but i have now. :mrgreen:
|