Thetownend.com

Had his throat slashed in Jail by a fellow inmate  :D, sadly the injuries are not life threatening  >:(

Good. Death is too good for that sick fucker.

I wish him nothing but pain and misery for the rest of his life.

so some horrible cunt attacked another horrible cunt.how wonderful

and ?








your point is exactly ????????????

you taking the piss, or do you want an explanation?

yeah go on

it's obvious what i meant, you can work it out.

no i can't. maybe someone can offer an explanation?

As Sam said Death is too good for that cunt. if it wasn't inside someone would do it outside. FACT

I think arriba's trying to say that the bloke who did it is probably not the salt of the earth Magic.

sod that, skin him alive then tie him to a car bumper and drag him over gravel pouring salt and vinegar on him.
Then soak him in petrol and set fire to him.that should about do it.

i gathered that Adje mate so don't see that problem

I like it when people write "FACT" at the end of their posts. It helps me work out which posts are facts and which ones aren't.

Poor bloke, I think I speak on behalf of the good-natured forum members in wishing him a speedy recovery.

BURN THE WITCH

Boh!!!  :yay:

Hmmm. You really have given some thought to your sadistic retribution, haven't you?

What he did was sick but I can't hate him on a personal level as it hasn't directly affected me (I know that may seem a bit frank but it's true). Besides, the person who attempted to kill him may have also killed school kids. You're probably championing another unsavory character by wishing the demise of another.

But if it sells more copies of the Daily Mail or The Sun, then the publishers will be happy.

you disgust me!

Sick cunt + throat slashed = good news.

Even better that some other wanker who is in prison did it. It means that said wanker is likely to be inside for a tad longer and it saves some decent person on the outside from doing it.

 I don't suppose you live in a backward Third World country by any chance ?? I'm sure this 'decent person on the outside' would end up being convicted of either attempted murder, malicious wounding, GBH etc, eventually being incarcerated along with all the other 'decent' people. Now there's a thought ! Since our prisons are overcrowded, why don't we just release all the 'decent' inmates ? No thanks. My point is - however vile we find a crime and however much hate we have for an individual, we do have a judicial system to deal with it (albeit with faults and not supportive of the death penalty which I agree with in certain instances). To condone a lynch mob scenario, though, is totally unacceptable. Likewise, those who seriously questioned the comments of arriba and Sie Pie should maybe take a good look at themselves. COYI.

Did anyone see on the News yesterday that the man that killed Sarah Payne has been found with pictures of her and other little girls in his cell? How The he'll was he getting his hands on these pictures?? How on earth must that make her poor family feel? 

I think the point is that he's in jail so who gives a fuck what happens, and why it is newsworthy is beyond me. Don't give the fucker any publicity just leave him be to rot doing his time.

I just wish someone would kill him and have done with it.....

Might not make me very popular with the screaming liberals but there you go - I would like him to dies a very slow, very painful and very horrible death.....

Wouldn't bring the two girls he murdered back though, would it?

We've got one of the best legal systems in the world and the sick fucker was tried, convicted and sentenced to rot in jail for the rest of his life. If we had capital punishment his suffering would've been over in seconds.

yeah, and stop the possibility of him ever getting out and doing it again.  Also save this country a bloody fortune on keeping the sicko breathing.....

I am not advocating anything quick and painless either - let the fucker suffer !

huntley wants to die,why should he ever get what he wants?
as we know nothing about the fella who attacked him,i find it it bit daft bigging him up like some kind of hero.
if he's in prison with huntley, you can guarantee there are victims of his crimes suffering in the real world too.

personally i would use scum like huntley as human guinea pigs and test medicines on them.

Where on this thread has anybody said anything even slightly positive about the guy who did it?

the first post takes great pleasure in it.also other posters are happy by the other criminals actions.people dont have to say that the guy's a hero to back what he has done.
i think some of you are just looking for an arguement when the opinions of others are crystal clear.

Hello kettle, this is pot, you are black.

The very first argument to this thread was you. Right there on the first page,

And I still don't see how the other guy is being 'bigged up' at all. People might be please to see that this Huntley twat was seriously injured by a rusty nail, it doesn't mean that they will be bigging up rusty nails now does it?

Nasty murderous cunt get seriously hurt and is likely in lots of pain = Good.

There is no need to try to read anything else into it.

I've been amazed by people's reaction to this. Not necessarily on here, but in general.

"Did you here about Huntley?"

"Yeah, great news"

I remember the days when a feel good story was a water skiing squirrel or a dog adopting some kittens. These days it's a child murderer getting his throat cut.

Apparently tonights feel good story will be recently discovered archive footage of an SS officer falling comically into a mass grave.

where?

i offered my opinion on the topic,nothing more,i thought my view was quite clear and i was not looking for an arguement at all.

Offering a differing opinion on a subject is arguing arriba.

[url width=308 height=320]http://granitegrok.com/pix/gallows.jpg[/url]

RARRRGHHH HANG HIM!!!!!

I don't think it is

Anybody who doesn't want this bloke slowly tortured to death deserves to be burnt at the stake for sympathising with the cunt.

The dictionary says otherwise:

1 : to give reasons for or against something : reason <argue for a new policy>
2 : to contend or disagree in words : dispute <argue about money>
transitive verb
1 : to give evidence of : indicate <the facts argue his innocence>
2 : to consider the pros and cons of : discuss <argue an issue>
3 : to prove or try to prove by giving reasons : maintain <asking for a chance to argue his case>
4 : to persuade by giving reasons : induce <couldn't argue her out of going>
synonyms see discuss
— ar·gu·er  \-gyə-wər, -gyü-ər\ noun

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/argue

Lets have an argument about what an argument is

To be honest, I think it's one of those things, where, if you can see a bit of Huntley inside yourself, then you're more likely to be vocally in support of punishing him in nasty ways. It's a way of hiding your own dark thoughts from others, and purging them from yourself.

Ian Huntley had an argument with Maxine Carr over the phone, just before he killed the two girls.

Be careful Bangkok and Arriba.

Is it me or did Bangkok Red have a whoosh moment

Ouch. It has just dawned on me that I did.

Doh!!

No you didn't

so because i didn't go along with the first post in the thread i was arguing?
you couldn't be more wrong.

I am no longer participating in this thread on the grounds that I can no longer identify the potential "whoosh" moments from the "Non-whoosh" moments.

That means that Arriba wins. And he wasn't even arguing! Good work, Arriba

No it doesn't.

So which one does the baying mob get to flay alive?

It's such a pain having "laws" and things like that. Lynch mobs are so much more effective, decisive and cheap. Who cares if a few paediatricians get killed. They probably deserved it. FACT.

Well at least my own whoosh has now been trumped.

According to Derek Acorah, the spirit of Michael Jackson may have possessed Ian Huntley.

The trouble is some people are always going to want cunts like him dead, and some people are always going to come down on the side of "let justice take its cause, thats why we have the law" etc....

There is no way that anyone is right or wrong on the debate - as always it's just about opinion.  I have kids and I know that if someone did that to one of my kids I would make it my lifes work to get my revenge - even if it meant I then was locked up for a long time.

Some people will agree with me and some will think I am sounding stupid - but I would expect that most who agree with me have kids and most who disagree don't (of course I may be totally wrong on that too !!) - and to be honest I think it's very hard to "get it" until you have kids of your own.....

What the fuck are you talking about anyway?

paediatricians  ???

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2000/aug/30/childprotection.society

:Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:

If anyone killed the children I don't have, I'd gather up the whole town and burn the fucker who did it at the stake. Or hold a celebration to those that did the same to the murderer of somebody elses children.

In that case would it be ok for the father of the guy you have just tortured and murderer to torture and murder you?

Are you asking that for real ?

So - a 28 year old man kidnaps, rapes, possibly tortures and  ultimately murders 2 10 year old girls.  If I were one of the girls fathers I would hunt him down and kill him if I had any way of possibly doing it.

Are you then REALLY suggesting the father of this 28 year old comes after me for retribution ?

I am talking about the sick paedo getting what he deserves ( I am not suggesting everyone should agree with me).

I am not too sure that killing him would make me a paedo and therefore your suggestion doesn't stack up as far as I can see ?

It wouldn't make you a paedo, but it would make you a murderer. It's an interesting point I think. Does the father of a paedo have any less right to be angry at the murder of his son than you would?

You bunch of liberal twats....

Some peado kills one of my daughter's I'd move heaven and fucking Earth to kill the fucker myself and I'd challenge any one of you who has kid's not to do the same.

NO.  The father of a paedo should hang his head in shame.  Try and make a quiet life for himself and make no waves that would single himself out.  Less people point at him and do him a serious injury for raising a perv.

It would make me a murderer with a clear conscience and a feeling that I had at least got some revenge for my daughter being killed.......

I'd actually be quite tempted to kill the fucking father as well for raising a wanker like that !

I really couldn't give a fuck if Huntley is detained alive or is dead, either way he can't do any more harm to the public.

I can see why others get strongly emotive, but we live in a society (thankfully) where this stuff is not ordinary. Nobody has murdered my friends or family, certainly not Huntley. None of them have ever even met him or the families of the girls. The way some people carry on is like the bloke is walking free, ready to hunt down and kill your own kids. Get him before he gets us! Down with the monster.

As I said, if he gets what is coming to him then fine, but it's hardly going to fill me with any pleasure or retribution, more so the knowledge that what goes around comes around and that sickos like Huntley will not get away with it.

why stop there? you could kill the mother as well. and any siblings. and perhaps are uncles or aunts who were particularly close to the family.

See now this thread's gotten really good. This is what I wanna see. People getting irate about theoretical revenge for theoretical molestations.  :D

Yeah father and mother seems fair - siblings seems a little outrageous......

OK maybe that was slightly over the top - but the fucker who did it would deserve everything he got..........

Or perhaps that's a double whoosh?

It seems the protagonists in this case fall into two factions.

The first faction contains all right minded people who see Huntley as subhuman who should die, die horribly or be tortured to the day he dies.

Second faction contains, Men/boys who haven't had children and run away from responsibility's at there first chance, lawyers/barristers who make their evil living protecting said subhumans and pincko faggots who think that NEW Labour still have the answers.

Glad to say I fall in the first category.  I also think that the families of terrorist should be sent to Muslim countries.  That'll make the buggers think twice before they blow themselves up.

Ace. I'd be up for that. Indonesia is quite nice.

Actually, scratch Indonesia, I'd like to go to the Maldives. 100% Muslim, as decreed in the constitution. Cracking beaches too.

If I'm going to get punished for a crime in which I'm no way responsible, I might as well get some diving in. Is it just parents and siblings, or do cousins count too? One of my cousins is pretty thick, but I'd worry that I'd miss the cut.

don't forget the pets - fucking animals.

so people have now been put in one camp or the other by a few on here.ridiculous.
i think peoples disgust of huntley is universal.
but those waving pitchforks and wanting him dead, would only be giving him what he wants.
death would be an escape for him.

Grow up you utter cunt. Any council estate inbred retard can get some slag pregnant and that doesn't give their opinion any more weight in any circumstance.

No one is saying that Huntley isn't a vile hateful man, and of course if he had have done what he did to those two girls, to my nearest and dearest I would be beyond upset. None of that gives me the right to be judge, jury and executioner.

Ghandi: "An eye for an eye and the whole world goes blind."

Ghandi obviously didn't love his children as much as trogladite does.

And people have two eyes anyway so if they lose one then they still have another.

Not too bright was he, Ghandi?

One of the saddest posts on this forum since Ironside moved on.

But it might well be Ardiles that a lot of people actually agree with at least part of it......

The man has a point - he is giving either end of the spectrum. I would think that the majority sit somewhere in the middle.