Thetownend.com

80% => The Nevillew General Discussion Forum => Topic started by: Doore on Monday, June 8, 2009, 00:39:38



Title: Twitter
Post by: Doore on Monday, June 8, 2009, 00:39:38
A mate was trying to explain to me what Twitter is - essentially people say stuff and get followed - is it online stalking?  I really don't get it.


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: flammableBen on Monday, June 8, 2009, 00:42:35
It's like a blog - where people sort of right diaries - but much more regular and a limit of using about 200 characters per entry.

So if you're interested that Stephen Fry is getting on a plane back to Britain then it's ace. Two mins later he'll tell you that he misses the shit English weather too.


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Doore on Monday, June 8, 2009, 00:52:12
Sounds pointless. What's wrong with traditional stalking?


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: flammableBen on Monday, June 8, 2009, 00:54:00
traditional stalking involves a big expenditure in binoculars and camouflage gear. It's like responsible allowed stalking. I'll give you updates on what I'm doing if you don't turn up on my front lawn naked sort of thing.


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Doore on Monday, June 8, 2009, 00:58:23
Taking the creepiness out of stalking - seems a bit soulless to me.  Its like being a Man Utd fan through watching sky sports - not the same as going down the County Ground.


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: flammableBen on Monday, June 8, 2009, 00:59:19
I reckon that if you're a Man Utd fan then you'll probably get a lot less from the county ground than you will from sky sports.


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Doore on Monday, June 8, 2009, 01:02:13
But you will get less fulfilment out of being a Man U fan through Sky Sports than you will going down the CG and watching Swindon.  You woud also get more out of the binoculars/hiding in hedges approach to stalking than you would from the lazy pseudo-stalking that is Twitter.


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: flammableBen on Monday, June 8, 2009, 01:05:23
Yeah but if you only want to watch man u then the county ground is shit. Maybe binoculars on the hill above Wycombe ground would be a good compromise?


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Doore on Monday, June 8, 2009, 01:06:52
Only if Stephen Fry is within binocular sight of Wycombe.


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: flammableBen on Monday, June 8, 2009, 01:12:25
Stephen Fry is ace.


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Luci on Monday, June 8, 2009, 09:05:36
I couldn't see the point of Twitter until I signed up, however now I think its ace!  Phillip Schofield is one cool dude as is Jonathan Ross! :D


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: pauld on Monday, June 8, 2009, 09:15:43
I couldn't see the point of Twitter until I signed up, however now I think its ace!  Phillip Schofield is one cool dude as is Jonathan Ross! :D
Anything that causes you to describe Philip Schofield as a "cool dude" is inherently bad


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Ardiles on Monday, June 8, 2009, 09:23:58
Stephen Fry is ace.

He's also a 'national treasure', the qualifications for which are being

(a) lovely;
(b) upper middle class and
(c) middle aged.

There's not many people (other than Fry, Joanna Lumley and Dame Judy Dench) who can tick all those boxes.


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Luci on Monday, June 8, 2009, 09:46:59
Anything that causes you to describe Philip Schofield as a "cool dude" is inherently bad

He's the silver fox!


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: spacey on Monday, June 8, 2009, 10:57:13
Stephen Fry is ace.

I read his autobiography of his youth a while back and was delighted to read that he went on a bit of a spree with a stolen credit card. He was eventually arrested in a hotel in Swindon, after the receptionist became suspicious of his expensive suit but trampy shoes.

http://www.swindonweb.com/index.asp?m=8&s=121&ss=1134&t=Stephen+Fry


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Whits on Sunday, July 5, 2009, 20:13:09
Anything that causes you to describe Philip Schofield as a "cool dude" is inherently bad

hes just put diesal in his petrol car and now its broken down...this is very stalkerish...first time i've been on there...still not sure if i fully get the point though

look how annoyed the silver fox is http://twitpic.com/9ewfx


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Luci on Sunday, July 5, 2009, 20:24:06
Ha ha Ive been looking at that earlier too - idiot!

I've been following Andy Roddick as well oh and Robson Kanu as his tweets are pretty random!


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Sunday, July 5, 2009, 20:35:14
Sounds pointless. What's wrong with traditional stalking?

I saw fB twice last week...I think I might take up stalking him.


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Dazzza on Sunday, July 5, 2009, 21:22:16
He's also a 'national treasure', the qualifications for which are being

(a) lovely;
(b) upper middle class and
(c) middle aged.

There's not many people (other than Fry, Joanna Lumley and Dame Judy Dench) who can tick all those boxes.
He's also a 'national treasure', the qualifications for which are being

(a) lovely;
(b) upper middle class and
(c) middle aged.

There's not many people (other than Fry, Joanna Lumley and Dame Judy Dench) who can tick all those boxes.

Ahem..

[url width=300 height=180]http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/470000/images/_472256_shipman300.jpg[/url]


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: jayohaitchenn on Monday, July 6, 2009, 08:51:50
Is that Harold Shipman?


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Bennett on Monday, July 6, 2009, 08:53:21
with a renault espace in the background? i believe so


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Monday, July 6, 2009, 13:26:55
Luci my friend got old Pippy to reply to him the other day! he was SO excited!


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Luci on Monday, July 13, 2009, 18:49:53
I made a mistake of mentioning Cluj on there the other day, I now have two stalkers from Romania following me! :O


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: STFC_Gazza on Monday, July 13, 2009, 19:04:27
dont fuckin understand twitter at all


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Bennett on Monday, July 13, 2009, 19:05:23
are you looking at people twittering in english gaz?


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: yeo on Monday, July 13, 2009, 19:11:05
I lost interest in Twitter pretty quickly,I need a new fad.


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: blinkpip on Monday, July 13, 2009, 20:01:53
I lost interest in Twitter pretty quickly,I need a new fad.
Throw stones at Dogs. Good hobbie that.


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Batch on Monday, July 13, 2009, 21:04:26
I joined twitter the t'other day. It's quite useful for certain things. e.g. I was tryig to find out whether the Vulcan would get tis Permit to Fly in time for RIAT. It did.

But I don't get why people would want to follow celebs, let alone normal plebs. I don't care what they are having for breakfast or wha they are thinking. Its just like facebook status. Rubbish:)


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: sonicyouth on Monday, July 13, 2009, 22:08:07
i'm finding it horribly addictive, especially during the first ashes test


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: michael on Monday, July 13, 2009, 22:09:07
I have been following BumbleCricket.

Anyone know what the "grand slam of naan" is?


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: iffy on Tuesday, August 4, 2009, 18:33:51
It's about 1,000 years since I last posted on this site, but I thought you'd want to know that Callum K is on twitter at: http://twitter.com/callum_k123

He posted a great one at abut 11pm a few nights back: http://twitter.com/callum_k123/status/2897871082

Someone else mentioned HRK. He's at http://twitter.com/Hal_RK and most of his posts are insane.


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: iffy on Tuesday, August 4, 2009, 18:36:52
and here's Sean Morrison: http://twitter.com/seanm_08


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, August 4, 2009, 18:38:04
Morrison:

Tom watson is on flames!!11:03 AM Jul 19th from TwitterBerry

:D


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, August 4, 2009, 19:05:41
Someone else mentioned HRK. He's at http://twitter.com/Hal_RK and most of his posts are insane.

Nothing insane about Nandos. Why isn't there one in Swindon. Whhhhy.


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: tans on Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 06:35:53
@MarlonKingCov

Cant be real


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: nevillew on Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 08:30:00
He's also a 'national treasure', the qualifications for which are being

(a) lovely;
(b) upper middle class and
(c) middle aged.

There's not many people (other than Fry, Joanna Lumley and Dame Judy Dench) who can tick all those boxes.

Helen Mirren


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Abrahammer on Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 13:23:48
@labolamagica for your daily supply of young foreign tit.

@Queen_UK is pretty funny


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Samdy Gray on Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 14:43:05
@shitmydadsays is pure genius.


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: herthab on Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 21:19:17
http://www.twat.me.uk/

Much better site...


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: leefer on Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 21:22:41
http://www.twat.me.uk/

Much better site...


Love it.


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Luci on Wednesday, October 27, 2010, 07:37:19
Kammy is good to follow, as is Dan Walker BBC and if you like Robbie Savage then he's ok too. Quite amusing.


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: Bennett on Wednesday, October 27, 2010, 09:00:36
i want to hate savage, especially on twitter, but every tries to battle him for no reason and savage comes out of it quite well


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: yeo on Wednesday, October 27, 2010, 09:24:02
Savage seems to think the way to win any argument is to post a picture of his car,he's a cock.


Title: Re: Twitter
Post by: OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR on Wednesday, October 27, 2010, 09:40:49
http://www.twat.me.uk/

Much better site...


Oh yes... :clap: