|
Title: Shirt sponsorship decision Post by: sonicyouth on Wednesday, May 25, 2005, 17:32:11 Vote away you horrible lot. I've chosen clean ones as I don't think the club will print 'does your mum up the shitter' :advercool:
Please vote for something that's not going to embarrass us all. Title: Shirt sponsorship decision Post by: Boeta on Wednesday, May 25, 2005, 17:38:01 Can't choose between We couldn't get Christian Roberts (simon pieman), Whits stole our money (Piemonte) and We assure you the rumours are not true (Ben Wah Balls)
This needs serious consideration 8) Title: Shirt sponsorship decision Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, May 25, 2005, 18:00:09 Is this the poll to end all polls? I like them all, it's a shame we couldn't have them all really.
Title: Shirt sponsorship decision Post by: Amir on Wednesday, May 25, 2005, 18:12:22 Quote I've chosen clean ones as I don't think the club will print 'does your mum up the shitter' Alright, I'll settle for dirtbox :D I quite like, 'whits stole our money', but it's a bit too much of an in joke. Title: Shirt sponsorship decision Post by: Boeta on Wednesday, May 25, 2005, 18:20:09 Quote from: "Amir Khan" I quite like, 'whits stole our money', but it's a bit too much of an in joke. that's what I've gone for Title: Shirt sponsorship decision Post by: Ben Wah Balls on Thursday, May 26, 2005, 00:05:18 Get those votes in for "We assure you the rumours are not true"
It's good you see as it can mean so many things, does it mean the rumours pertaining to the signing of new players or about the club are not true or is it some sort of rumour about the forum the swindon populace should be aware of that we are reassuring them isn't true? Or....? Who knows but anyone who reads it will be so intrigued they'll take a look immediately possibly even investing in a computer and t'internet just to satisfy their curiosity. Title: Shirt sponsorship decision Post by: reeves4england on Thursday, May 26, 2005, 16:51:53 None of them are suitable if you don't visit the TE, so I just went for Whits stole our money!!!
Title: Shirt sponsorship decision Post by: Boeta on Thursday, May 26, 2005, 16:54:52 Quote from: "reeves4england" None of them are suitable if you don't visit the TE, so I just went for Whits stole our money!!! Are you sure you've got that the right way round. Whits stole are money is the only unsuitable one unless you visit tefTitle: Shirt sponsorship decision Post by: mexico red on Thursday, May 26, 2005, 18:21:12 oi what about my 8 out of 10 members dont have a girlfriend
Title: Shirt sponsorship decision Post by: Sussex on Thursday, May 26, 2005, 18:28:41 Quote from: "mexico red" oi what about my 8 out of 10 members dont have a girlfriend That was my favourite, which is why I've boycotted the vote 8) Title: Shirt sponsorship decision Post by: Amir on Thursday, May 26, 2005, 18:33:24 I'd prefer that to the other options as well, and I've not voted.
This could get like the Ukrainian election :advercool: Title: Shirt sponsorship decision Post by: yeo on Thursday, May 26, 2005, 18:56:07 Yes I want that ,I retract my vote. :P
Title: Shirt sponsorship decision Post by: sonicyouth on Thursday, May 26, 2005, 18:58:26 am I going to have to make a new poll?
Title: Shirt sponsorship decision Post by: yeo on Thursday, May 26, 2005, 19:00:15 yes please
Title: Shirt sponsorship decision Post by: mexico red on Thursday, May 26, 2005, 19:01:05 haha i am the greatest, bow down at my altar
Title: Shirt sponsorship decision Post by: sonicyouth on Thursday, May 26, 2005, 19:02:39 cunts i'll do it later.
Title: Shirt sponsorship decision Post by: yeo on Thursday, May 26, 2005, 19:03:40 Ha ha I might not vote for it just to be difficult :D
Title: Shirt sponsorship decision Post by: mexico red on Thursday, May 26, 2005, 19:05:43 what about
www.thetownend.com more hits than mrs hewlett Title: Shirt sponsorship decision Post by: Sussex on Thursday, May 26, 2005, 19:19:07 Members rebelling against forum admin (and moderator approving their actions) shocker!!
Don't get mad and ban us all though :wink: These 4 votes would put 'Mex's strap on right up there' with the leaders, and as such, I feel any vote I were to make for the current candidates would be a wasted vote. I would therefore resort to tactical voting to get the leading candidate toppled. Such actions would result in an unfair result in the current poll, rendering it an unrealistic opinion of forum users views :D |