Thetownend.com

80% => Sports => Topic started by: Spencer_White on Thursday, December 11, 2008, 08:44:58



Title: First Test
Post by: Spencer_White on Thursday, December 11, 2008, 08:44:58
Won the toss.Going ok at the moment. :)

164-1 at tea.Cook the man out.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Thursday, December 11, 2008, 09:03:17
8/1 To win this England are


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Summerof69 on Thursday, December 11, 2008, 09:41:24
Strauss have got a hundred...but Pietersen's just gone for 4 !!

180-3


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: larwood on Thursday, December 11, 2008, 15:23:13
229-5.Not a massive shock that we falter after such a good start.

Oh well,its probably going to rain anyway.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Thursday, December 11, 2008, 16:40:14
Wow a collapse. Didn't see that one coming *rolls eyes*


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, December 11, 2008, 17:37:05
Okay, I know he got a shocking decision today, but how the flying flemish fuck is Paul Collingwood in this team ahead of Owais Shah.

Bowlers get tossed aside as fast as you like if they're out of form, even if they're the longest serving player in the team, and yet a Batsman couldn't get dropped if he went out there and batted with the wrong hand for a laugh.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Thursday, December 11, 2008, 17:38:12
Why are any of them in the team? No doubt we'll lose again like always.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Bob's Orange on Thursday, December 11, 2008, 18:14:46
Can any cricketers tell me if England are playing a test in Bangalore at all around January? Should be going out there for 3 months working from January 13th.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, December 11, 2008, 18:16:38
Can any cricketers tell me if England are playing a test in Bangalore at all around January? Should be going out there for 3 months working from January 13th.

   :no:


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Bob's Orange on Thursday, December 11, 2008, 18:19:29
   :no:

Ah well, I don't really like cricket anyway, just would have been something to do!


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, December 11, 2008, 18:21:23
Might get some IPL though if you're into the flashy stuff.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, December 11, 2008, 18:23:16
Ah well, I don't really like cricket anyway, just would have been something to do!

 You'll just have to wile away the hours on here posting on the 478 page...who will be the next manager thread.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Bob's Orange on Thursday, December 11, 2008, 18:28:21
Might get some IPL though if you're into the flashy stuff.

Yeah, I guess if I am in India I am going to have to go to some sort of cricket!!


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Spencer_White on Friday, December 12, 2008, 08:42:16
Fucking hell,Swan has got two wickets in his first over in international test cricket!

WHOOT. :banana:


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Nick Bamosomi on Friday, December 12, 2008, 09:03:53
Great start for him!!

Apparently he is the first in the history of test cricket to get 2 wickets in his first ever over.
Glad we can still get a few things right.
Was going to say before this happened that Strauss must feel like Coxy did after his hat-tricks - doing all the hard work only for the rest of the team to throw it away for him.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: mexico red on Friday, December 12, 2008, 09:05:00
prior didnt throw it away nor did cook


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: A Gent Orange on Friday, December 12, 2008, 09:32:38
Apparently he is the first in the history of test cricket to get 2 wickets in his first ever over.

Apparently now no the first in the history of test cricket to get 2 wickets in his first ever over. It seems that Richard Johnson did against Zimbabwe. That is the problem of relying on Sky not having TMS on.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Scot Munroe on Friday, December 12, 2008, 10:30:21
Laxman and Tendulkar gone. 102-5. Panesar and Flintoff with the wickets.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: axs on Friday, December 12, 2008, 10:32:07
Waiting for the tail to make 200 more now.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: mexico red on Friday, December 12, 2008, 10:53:01
i wish everyone would stop all this negative shit, football/cricket, fuck off the lot of you.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: axs on Friday, December 12, 2008, 10:54:10
Eveythings Shit.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, December 13, 2008, 08:04:02
Third morning and we're two down with a 100 odd run lead. I'd have taken that at the start, could have done a little better this morning but we're far from throwing this away.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, December 13, 2008, 08:07:41
And Pietersen's gone for naff all. Why oh why do I post these things.

Here comes Colly to save the day/his career.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Saturday, December 13, 2008, 09:32:40
KP's going downhill now he's captain. Could see that coming a mile off. Nice one selectors.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Nick Bamosomi on Saturday, December 13, 2008, 10:50:56
Colly and Strauss have put on a good partnership score of over 100 - could Paul Collingwookd be getting some form back?


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: dell boy on Saturday, December 13, 2008, 11:38:40
Colly and Strauss have put on a good partnership score of over 100 - could Paul Collingwookd be getting some form back?

Played well, Collingwood has been very unlucky in Test cricket over the last couple of seasons, every bad decision seems to have his name on it.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: axs on Sunday, December 14, 2008, 09:32:10
Great knocks from Strauss and Colly. 387 target for India.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: land_of_bo on Sunday, December 14, 2008, 09:39:35
25 off first 3 overs!


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, December 14, 2008, 09:41:51
What an odd scorecard we have, Two 108's and nobody else bar Prior got into double figures.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, December 14, 2008, 09:52:55
Sodding hell.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Sunday, December 14, 2008, 10:32:31
Does no one fancy getting Sehwag out then?


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Nemo on Sunday, December 14, 2008, 10:40:11
Meh, we just got Gambhir out bat/pad and Harper didn't give it.

I don't fancy being a bowler right now.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: axs on Sunday, December 14, 2008, 10:41:11
Someone should tell him it's not Twenty20.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Sunday, December 14, 2008, 11:00:42
96-0 now. Surely not? It wouldn't surprise me though. Nothing does with England.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Scot Munroe on Sunday, December 14, 2008, 11:56:42
Sehwag out to Graham Swann near the close of play.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: leefer on Sunday, December 14, 2008, 11:59:33
Strauss ton in both innings....only the tenth player in Test match History to do this...a great effort.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Bogus Dave on Sunday, December 14, 2008, 14:16:32
KP's going downhill now he's captain. Could see that coming a mile off. Nice one selectors.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: axs on Monday, December 15, 2008, 09:30:28
Can't believe we're gonna lose this.

Oh, hang on, yes I can.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: mexico red on Monday, December 15, 2008, 09:36:56
i can when you're up against tendulkar batting like he is


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: janaage on Monday, December 15, 2008, 12:07:48
Strauss ton in both innings....only the tenth player in Test match History to do this...a great effort.

Is he the first man to do that and then lose the test?


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: REDBUCK on Monday, December 15, 2008, 12:14:10
It's rare but has happened before to an English player


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: axs on Monday, December 15, 2008, 12:51:42
Is he the first man to do that and then lose the test?

No, happened to Andy Flower as well according to TMS. Do I mean Andy Flower? I can't remember.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: janaage on Monday, December 15, 2008, 13:02:53
That must be the cricketing equivalent to doing a "Simon Cox".  Two hat tricks away from home and didn't win either.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: DMR on Monday, December 15, 2008, 14:44:32
Fucking terrible, absolutely pathetic. Keep Swann, Freddie and Strauss and the rest can fuck off.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Monday, December 15, 2008, 17:42:42
Totally pathetic defeat. No bottle again. Put the B team out for the second test. They'd do a better job than these overpaid clowns.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Scot Munroe on Monday, December 15, 2008, 18:14:01
Totally pathetic defeat. No bottle again. Put the B team out for the second test. They'd do a better job than these overpaid clowns.

what are you on. They just beat australia 2-0 in there backyard. We had them 4 down after lunch but came against a genius in the little master Tendulkar. fair play to India they beat us. we gave them a run for their money. It was taken away from us when Sehwag went mental thinking it was a 20-20 game.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Rich Pullen on Monday, December 15, 2008, 18:16:49
Meh, this result is no different to all the others.

Very few crickets nations throw away tests like good ol' England.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Monday, December 15, 2008, 18:26:37
what are you on. They just beat australia 2-0 in there backyard. We had them 4 down after lunch but came against a genius in the little master Tendulkar. fair play to India they beat us. we gave them a run for their money. It was taken away from us when Sehwag went mental thinking it was a 20-20 game.

Gave them a run for their money? Don't make me laugh. We had them down for the count for 4 days but still lost. It's a joke. Would you be happy if STFC lost a game being 4-0 up? No you wouldn't.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Bogus Dave on Monday, December 15, 2008, 18:27:52
That sounds like we gave them a run for their money tbf


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Monday, December 15, 2008, 18:31:33
And then gave up. That 2005 side would have crushed them by 150 runs. I won't go on. I like a bloody good moan about how crap the cricket team is.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Scot Munroe on Monday, December 15, 2008, 18:46:42
again we go back to the ashes 2005 side. they will never play again together. We had India on the ropes for 3 days not 4. 4th day they fought back. I am not going to moan about this defeat because we got beaten by a team on the top of their game and a batsman who is proably the best in the world atm.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Bogus Dave on Monday, December 15, 2008, 18:51:12
At the moment? Theres quite a strong case for tendulkar to be reagrded as the best ever


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: leefer on Monday, December 15, 2008, 21:07:17
Brilliant match,i feel Petersen wanted to bat out the fourth day  and get another hundred runs...India won it,England didnt throw it,but a more experienced man wouldve have batted out the innings that would probably guaranteed a draw...oh and for the people Knocking Peterson he played the whole match with a fractured Rib cos he felt it that important to play after the terrorist tradgedy,so well done to both teams on a great game.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Nemo on Monday, December 15, 2008, 21:13:56
And then gave up. That 2005 side would have crushed them by 150 runs. I won't go on. I like a bloody good moan about how crap the cricket team is.

I put it to you sir, that you are the STFC Bart of Cricket. Except you generally reply to posts calling you names.

Bloody good match, but I'm gutted we've lost. I dearly hope they play Shah next week.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: leefer on Monday, December 15, 2008, 21:21:07
Who would you drop Nemo....ive lost patience with Harmisson hes offering nothing at present.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Nemo on Monday, December 15, 2008, 21:26:41
Who would I drop? I could make a case for quite a few:

Cook: The future but has failed so much recently. No direct replacement helps him out, unless you call Vaughan up.
Bell: When the going gets tough, Ian Bell hides under the table (Cookie for the reference)
Collingwood: Scored a 100 for a last minute reprieve yet again, needs to be under constant threat of being dropped to perform
Harmison: Offers little in India, but then again that's the same for most non-swing seamers
Anderson: Is meant to be able to swing it, didn't at all.
Panesar: Warne is spot on here; he hasn't improved one bit since his debut.

But on the other hand, that wasn't a bad overall performance, even if it was basically a 3 man team (Swann, Strauss, Fred), so it seems harsh to ring the changes. What's Amjad Khan like, I don't recall seeing him bowl?


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: leefer on Monday, December 15, 2008, 21:39:07
Not sure about Khan, i like Cook though his fielding cost us in this match,Panesar has to play because hes the best weve got though i feel he dosnt get the backing a spinner like Warne got.
My argument is that India have completly changed the way Test Cricket is played,Sehwag for instance...why not start the bowling with a spinner?...why the same old thing,I like Anderson ,good fielder too with his batting improving.
I think the press talk a lot of bull about the pitches...that pitch was perfect,tons scored and lots of wickets.
Think Bell could make way for Shah for a few matches to give him a run...though Bell is quality he plays like hes having a net...and defo not for the one dayers for me.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: Nemo on Monday, December 15, 2008, 21:41:54
Starting the bowling with a spinner?

Because fast bowlers tend to work better with a new ball, if they don't open the bowling we may as well pick four spinners and Fred.

Hell, if we did that we might even get our overs in at the required rate for once.


Title: Re: First Test
Post by: leefer on Monday, December 15, 2008, 21:52:09
Well its hard to get a spinner away with the lack of pace..fast bowlers can be wayward and Sehwag wouldnt have started like he did with spin at both ends...not sayind all the time but against players like Sehwag try something different.