Thetownend.com

25% => The Reg Smeeton Match Day Action/Reaction Forum => Topic started by: STFCere on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 19:48:24



Title: back four against crewe....
Post by: STFCere on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 19:48:24
has already been announced....nice one byrne u twat so crewe now have 3 days to prepare for our defence. he did the same for the carlisle game..im no manager but surely announcing part of your team 4 days in advance is a bit of stupid thing to do.


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: Samdy Gray on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 19:48:57
The OS says the whole line-up will be unchanged.


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 19:50:47
Doesn't make any difference as they would've prepared by watching our last game anyway. Timlin is the only contender for the back four. If we can't beat or at least draw against a team with 9 points then things are reeeeeeally bad.


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: reeves4england on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 19:52:03
The OS says the whole line-up will remain the same, but I'm wondering if that's miswritten as there is no direct quote to back it up. Judging from what I've heard about Saturday, I reckon it'd be worth keeping the same back 4 and chucking Timlin back into centre mid to shore it up a bit


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: JPC82 on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 19:52:17
dave only said same backline so timlin could still replace pooky


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: STFCere on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 19:53:19
but why announce it?? its like shooting urself in the foot. of course tell the players they r playing but dont announce to the public until the last minute so crewe has as lil time as poss to prepare. shouts of amateurism i cant wait until stfc get a professional decent manager in who knows wot he is doing


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: JPC82 on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 19:54:25
as soon as the players know i announce it anyway :)


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: dell boy on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 19:56:15
dave only said same backline so timlin could still replace pooky
Would find it hard to believe if Timlin was left out.


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: RobertT on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 19:58:23
Given our consistent selection in seasons like 89/90 and 92/93 and even 95/96, teams must have really had the edge on us knowing with a high degree of certainty who they'd be playing.

Teams have also clearly got the edge over Man Utd, Chelsea and Liverpool.


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 20:00:00
No one complained when they announced that Kennedy and Ifil were starting last week. Why complain now?

To be honest me thinks this is complaining for the sake of it.


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: Tails on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 20:36:19
but why announce it?? its like shooting urself in the foot. of course tell the players they r playing but dont announce to the public until the last minute so crewe has as lil time as poss to prepare. shouts of amateurism i cant wait until stfc get a professional decent manager in who knows wot he is doing

How will us announcing our back 4 change Crewe's game plan and how they approach the game?


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 20:40:36
No one complained when they announced that Kennedy and Ifil were starting last week. Why complain now?

To be honest me thinks this is complaining for the sake of it.

It's a chance to have another dig at Byrne.


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: fatbury on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 20:44:26
as well as Kennedy did on Saturday .. id like Timlin back there for Crewe game .. he isnt much cop in midfield but is very solid at left back .. too much too soon for young Callum

and does this mean another game in charge for Byrne?


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 20:49:24
and does this mean another game in charge for Byrne?

Probably, although it could be one of those occasions where the new guy doesn't start work until Monday.


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:14:37
Gives the back 4 a week to work together. Now i don't like byrne but wont moan at the bloke for trying to fix what is obviously broke


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: JPC82 on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:15:59
dave must be racist, hes dropped the 2 blackest defenders in amankwaah and kanyuka and brought back jerel just cos hes not as black, disgusting really


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: herthab on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:16:46
as well as Kennedy did on Saturday .. id like Timlin back there for Crewe game .. he isnt much cop in midfield but is very solid at left back .. too much too soon for young Callum

and does this mean another game in charge for Byrne?

What exactly did Kennedy do wrong on Saturday? I like Timlin, but Kennedy showed real promise.

If Byrne should drop anyone, it would be Pook. Last weeks performance was poor.


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: DiV on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:53:59
Of course by saying the defence will remain the same Crewe will be fucked when we line up with; Kevin Amankwaah, Patrick Kanyuka, Sean Morrison and Kasali Yinka 'Drysdale' Casal.


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 21:55:30
Kasali Yinka 'Drysdale' Casal.

Oh dear, what a comparison!


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: Batch on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 23:06:39
What exactly did Kennedy do wrong on Saturday? I like Timlin, but Kennedy showed real promise.

If Byrne should drop anyone, it would be Pook. Last weeks performance was poor.

He didn't do anything wrong. If Kennedy stays at left back and Timlin plays in midfield then fair enough. If it's a straight fight for the left back spot in my opinion Timlin is currently the better/more experienced player and should start.


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: chalkies_shorts on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 23:12:03
To be honest regardless of the line up all Crewe have to do is press us and we'll fuck up at the back. Just sit on the central two so as their distribution is even more shit than usual. Ally that to running at Jack Smith and the opposition is quids in. And don't forget Crewe don;t actually have to do anyhing particualry well, we'll just fuck up and let them have an early X mas gift or teo. 


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: Tails on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 23:18:08
To be honest regardless of the line up all Crewe have to do is press us and we'll fuck up at the back. Just sit on the central two so as their distribution is even more shit than usual. Ally that to running at Jack Smith and the opposition is quids in. And don't forget Crewe don;t actually have to do anyhing particualry well, we'll just fuck up and let them have an early X mas gift or teo. 

Yeah but in all fairness their main attacking threat is Calvin Zola. We can sit back and let them run at us, the ball will run to him and he'll either trip over it and it'll come of his arse and we'll win a few throw ins.


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: chalkies_shorts on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 23:21:59
Yeah but in all fairness their main attacking threat is Calvin Zola. We can sit back and let them run at us, the ball will run to him and he'll either trip over it and it'll come of his arse and we'll win a few throw ins.

Is that after its hit our defenders arses a few times and eneded in the net or he;'s tripped over the ball and somehoew taken out Phil Smith and Aljofree / Ifiill / Smith / Kennedy - please delete as appropriate.
The quality of attacker doesn't actually matter - we are well capable of fucking up against the worst a la carlisle Saturday. 


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 23:23:14
Tails i said that about bas savage and michael rickets


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: Tails on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 23:24:57
Touché.

Calvin Zola is still naff though.


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: RobertT on Wednesday, December 10, 2008, 00:12:08
Given Crewe's season so far, I hardly think they'll be spending too much time worrying about our back 4, they'll be spending enough time worrying about their own.  It'll probably end 0-0 having said that.


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: Bob's Orange on Wednesday, December 10, 2008, 06:50:33
Please stop writing off Crewe. I think they are an amazingly gifted side and I will be very happy to escape the cauldron of Gresty Road with points!


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: Colin Todd on Wednesday, December 10, 2008, 11:41:06
Oh dear, what a comparison!

Drysdale was better,  seriously


Title: Re: back four against crewe....
Post by: Rich Pullen on Wednesday, December 10, 2008, 11:47:51
Drysdale was better,  seriously

I remember and watched Drysdale play for Swindon many times... However, JD had over 50 games to prove his creditials of being shit - Casal has had 5. The latter may never get to prove how even more awful/or how decent he actually is :D