Title: Super Sam Post by: Power to people on Tuesday, October 21, 2008, 12:51:10 Apparently Orient want to take him on loan from Luton with a view to making it permanant in January.
Could be a good signing if it happens, but wouldn't help Luton's cause though Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: Ardiles on Tuesday, October 21, 2008, 12:54:49 Luton's cause is lost though. They will be playing Conference football next year...with or without Sam.
Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Tuesday, October 21, 2008, 13:19:37 Would be a good move for him. He needs to get out of Luton really.
Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: fatbury on Tuesday, October 21, 2008, 13:33:41 we should gazump them
Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: tans on Tuesday, October 21, 2008, 13:39:50 no
Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: janaage on Tuesday, October 21, 2008, 13:39:52 Fatbury, despite what Uncle Bob said, signing a player on loan, is NOT like buying a house.
Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: BANGKOK RED on Tuesday, October 21, 2008, 13:46:27 Fatbury, despite what Uncle Bob said, signing a player on loan, is NOT like buying a house. It's more like renting a house. Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: Simon Pieman on Tuesday, October 21, 2008, 22:09:21 Parkin is a rentboy?
Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: pauld on Tuesday, October 21, 2008, 22:26:12 Parkin is a rentboy? No, he's a houseboy. He'll come round and do some light hoovering, bit of dusting and have your slippers and a G&T ready for when you get home from workTitle: Re: Super Sam Post by: Sippo on Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 07:23:40 *waits for someone to say 'lets get him here instead'.
Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 07:26:59 Let's get him here instead.
Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: nevillew on Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 10:42:36 *waits for someone to say 'lets get him here instead'. As in Fatbury's "should we gazump them" ? Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: Arriba on Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 11:17:24 we have nobody on loan here yet.if he's available then why shouldn't we get him?
Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: dell boy on Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 11:19:10 we have nobody on loan here yet.if he's available then why shouldn't we get him? It is not forwards we need though, if we are going to get loan players in, we need a goalkeeper who doesn't flap for a start.Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: Peter Venkman on Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 11:47:09 I agree its not forwards we need but on the other hand.....Sammy WILL put extra bums on seats at the CG.
So the extra attendances may even pay for his wages for the period of the loan. Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: dell boy on Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 11:49:35 Thinking on the forward front, at the beginning of the season Malpas stated we don't need forwards when all of us were praying for a forward signing. Flip me he is being proved right on that front.
Malpas In Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 11:54:56 As much as I love the guy, we don't need Parkin right now. Cox & Paynter have a really good partnership going and play well together and Corr provides adequate cover.
Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: Batch on Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 12:13:22 Agreed. I'd take a fully fit Parkin over Paynter player for player any day. But as you say, Paynter and Cox seem to work well. Nice finish from Billy yesterday too (two in two).
Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: Arriba on Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 12:16:09 It is not forwards we need though, if we are going to get loan players in, we need a goalkeeper who doesn't flap for a start. why not strengthen up front? alot would argue that when strong in an area is the best time to do it. i know we need other areas bolstering too,but i'd deffo get parkin in.we have nothing to lose if it's only a loan. Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: Simon Pieman on Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 12:32:26 When Cox goes in January for £5m we could use some of that money to pay for Parkin.
Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: ronnie21 on Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 12:55:32 When Cox goes in January for £5m we could use some of that money to pay for Parkin. :Ride On Fatbury's Lovestick:Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: Spencer_White on Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 19:11:42 Lay off. He needs that pay packet to hang out in the advance hair studio with Shane Warne.
Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: LucienSanchez on Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 22:17:18 As good as he was for us, i wouldn't come back just because he returned, if that hypothetically happened, and i hypothetically didnt turn up any more.
I really dont want to re-sign him. Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: Bogus Dave on Thursday, October 23, 2008, 15:31:46 officialy signed on loan for leyton orient, will still be their when we play them on the 20th
Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Thursday, October 23, 2008, 15:32:16 ooooooooooooooooooooooooh
Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: Arriba on Thursday, October 23, 2008, 15:36:55 our loss
Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: janaage on Thursday, October 23, 2008, 15:55:19 officialy signed on loan for leyton orient, will still be their when we play them on the 20th He'll still be there... ...but injured. Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Thursday, October 23, 2008, 17:22:50 Don't we play them Boxing Day as well? Twice in a row. That's a bit weird like.
Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: Bogus Dave on Thursday, October 23, 2008, 17:26:55 i was just repeating what was on another site. Your right, it is the 26th, not the 20th
Title: Re: Super Sam Post by: dell boy on Thursday, October 23, 2008, 17:42:56 Theres no way he will be fit for the 26th guaranteed injury before then, that has been his problem since he left us.
|