Thetownend.com

80% => Sports => Topic started by: Nemo on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 10:04:46



Title: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 10:04:46
Just started, we're batting.

TMS managed to crack me up after 10 words when Agnew described Vaughan as "A useless tosser"


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: strooood on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 11:39:19
strauss stands on his wicket, then vaughan goes  duck without getting an edge.

bollocks.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: strooood on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 11:41:25
golden duck*

oh and it appears vaughan did get the slightest of edges.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: sonic youth on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 11:57:49
and now kp's gone


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 11:58:35
Vaughan seems to be magnetic to good balls at the moment. He's in trouble though, surely.

KP  :( Oh dear.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Lumps on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 12:01:50
Pietersen lbw for 4. This is a bloody disaster!


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 12:04:30
Cook looks solid mind.

Time for Bell to end everybodies favourite statistic I think.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: LucienSanchez on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 12:20:11
As good as some of the balls to Vaughan have been, he and some of our batsmen need to learn to leave the fucking ball alone a bit more. Needless edges have cost countless wickets this series.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 12:24:54
Neil McKenzie for batting coach, that guy leaves everything.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 12:32:44
 :smack:

  Fucking unbelievable...I go out half hour befroe lunch thinking...nice flat track batsdman's  day, looking good for the afternoon.....


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Lumps on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 12:52:48
Just started, we're batting.

TMS managed to crack me up after 10 words when Agnew described Vaughan as "A useless tosser"

That might have been deliberate on Aggers part as the two of them had a bit of a falling out in an interview I heard this morning.

To paraphrse:

Aggers: Under pressure to score runs then?

Vaughn: Yes of course but as ever, there's always pressure etc. etc. You've asked me that question yourself a hundred times

Aggers: Well score some bloody runs and I can stop asking it!

Vaughn: Well you wouldn't know yourself as you weren't a good enough bowler to play test cricket...

Aggers (interrupting): You need to check your Wisden's

Vaughn: Oh you got a couple of games did you

Aggers: 3 acutually

Vaughn laughs at him


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 13:03:13
Yes, I heard that clip. Vaughan's getting a little bit tetchy.

I don't know why they bother interviewing anybody in the England team apart from Harmison, all they get is platitudes about giving 100% (Read: Not dropping anyone) and it being a team game (Read: KP will save us)


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 13:31:22
Agnew to Vaughan via Text: How does it feel to score 0 in a test match: I never did.

Awesome. Nothing like a nice side show to events.

On the field, Cook and Bell are looking solid enough.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 13:33:08
Oh fer fooks sake, the moment I post that Cook edges to Kallis for 70 some.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: strooood on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 14:13:52
starting to swing a bit. if we can hang on until tea like this i'd be quite happy... could get quite ugly though.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 14:20:08
Collingwood gone. This is horrendously predictable. Flintoff on his way out, followed by Ambrose.

Stroood has it right when he says this could be ugly.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Lumps on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 14:22:56
Tell me again. Collingwood. What is it he's for?


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 14:23:41
He cried when they left him out last time, so they couldn't bear not to have him around. And he's a good fella, dontcha know.

Seriously though, he's a damned good fielder, if that helps.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: strooood on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 14:28:18
an in-form collingwood is irreplaceable, out of form, nigh-on pointless.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 14:37:49
Bell gone too, Ambrose and Flintoff to save England from scoring under 200? Feck.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: fatbury on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 14:42:02
Ambrose wont last for long he never does .. umpteen wicketkeepers are better than him at both the job behind the stumps AND batting - why is he in?


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Boeta on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 15:17:45
Ambrose wont last for long he never does .. umpteen wicketkeepers are better than him at both the job behind the stumps AND batting - why is he in?
because there's no-one who can bat better than him that is as good with the gloves
because there's no-one who can keeper better than him who is better with the bat


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: janaage on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 16:28:38
Nice six from Flintoff followed by a four. 


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: michael on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 16:30:20
Vaughan seems to be magnetic to good balls at the moment. He's in trouble though, surely.

KP  :( Oh dear.

Vaughan makes average deliveries look like good ones.

Tick tock tick tock...


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: janaage on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 16:33:44
I'm sorry as you know I'm no cricket man but two run outs in three deliveries is awful.  I suppose they want to Saffas in to face the english attack at this time of evening but even so.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Scot Munroe on Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 17:15:51
Flintoff strikes. Smith gone. Harris is in as Night watchman.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, July 31, 2008, 12:58:04
Seriously though, he's a damned good fielder, if that helps.

Oh for crying out loud.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, July 31, 2008, 13:05:07
Amla gone to Anderson, tidy catch. 118-3. Kallis in, he's worryingly overdue a huge innings.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: larwood on Thursday, July 31, 2008, 13:18:07
Virgil is getting desperate,not a good sign when he's being pissy about Aggers asking him perfectly valid questions.

The fact the test started on a Wednesday annoys me,its not right,i don't care how many corporate boxes it means for Edgbaston,needs to be stoped >:(

Anyway rantage over,i reckon the game could go either way at them moment,if we can get another couple out before tea it might give us a bit of an advantage.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Thursday, July 31, 2008, 13:19:46
Agnew is at pains to explain it was more light hearted than it sounds, but yes, he did seem a bit cross.

Neil Mac's gone, could we keep this respectable?


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Lumps on Thursday, July 31, 2008, 15:11:19
Agnew is at pains to explain it was more light hearted than it sounds, but yes, he did seem a bit cross.

Neil Mac's gone, could we keep this respectable?

No, I don't think so. Kalis looks settled, Prince looks like he's just about got in. We can't bowl Freddie all the way through.

Hopefully it will piss down for a couple of days.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Bogus Dave on Thursday, July 31, 2008, 16:48:48
kallis gaaahhhnnn


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Thursday, July 31, 2008, 16:51:54
Another slack performance. Collingwood's recall was great wasn't it? What a waste of space. No Broad. Yeah well done selectors. Oh and we're not doing too well again. What a surprise. You never know Vaughan might get more than 20 runs one day.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, July 31, 2008, 17:52:55
Another slack performance. Collingwood's recall was great wasn't it? What a waste of space. No Broad. Yeah well done selectors. Oh and we're not doing too well again. What a surprise. You never know Vaughan might get more than 20 runs one day.

  Freddie has hauled us back into this, with new ball early tomorrow, then all isn't lost, still need some back up from Sid or Jimmy though.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: sonic youth on Thursday, July 31, 2008, 18:41:12
watching freddy bowl is wonderful


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Spud on Thursday, July 31, 2008, 21:21:40
I don't get the whole dropping of Broad because he needs a rest only for him to then play for Nottinghamshire!? verrrrrrrrrrrrry odd.  >:(


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Thursday, July 31, 2008, 21:45:13
  Freddie has hauled us back into this, with new ball early tomorrow, then all isn't lost, still need some back up from Sid or Jimmy though.

Freddie has been the only positive of the game. Someone that actually cares and wears the shirt with pride. Good to see him back.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Thursday, July 31, 2008, 21:46:13
I don't get the whole dropping of Broad because he needs a rest only for him to then play for Nottinghamshire!? verrrrrrrrrrrrry odd.  >:(

Ask the selectors. I'm not even sure they could give you an answer.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Lumps on Friday, August 1, 2008, 10:17:43
Seriously though, he's (EDIT - usually) a damned good fielder, if that helps.

Hmmmmmmmm!


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Friday, August 1, 2008, 10:37:37
Prince out to Stringfellow, so we're into the tail. Respectability emerging.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Lumps on Friday, August 1, 2008, 10:57:07
And Snorkel's gone to Jimmy A!


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Lumps on Friday, August 1, 2008, 11:06:20
Bugger me it looks like we might keep this to under 300!


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Boeta on Friday, August 1, 2008, 11:22:02
Ask the selectors. I'm not even sure they could give you an answer.
it's because broad was in the side primarily as a bowler and his test bowling average is 49


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Foggy on Friday, August 1, 2008, 11:33:45
it's because broad was in the side primarily as a bowler and his test bowling average is 49

If that is the case what the hell are KP,Virgil and Collingwood doing in the team as their primary objection is to score runs! Billy Big bollocks KP is the one that needs to go back to county cricket and stop batting like a tosser.   


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Don Rogers Shop on Friday, August 1, 2008, 11:39:37
is vaughan any good


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Foggy on Friday, August 1, 2008, 11:45:22
is vaughan any good

Frankie Vaughan was better.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, August 1, 2008, 12:05:03
Frankie Vaughan was better.

  You're showing your age there Fogster....I reckon Norman Vaughan would get more runs in this match  :thumb:


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Lumps on Friday, August 1, 2008, 12:36:20
Oh for fucksake!


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: strooood on Friday, August 1, 2008, 12:46:38
one of these two needs to score biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiig.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: suttonred on Friday, August 1, 2008, 12:48:58
Looks like i'll be going to a dead series next week


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: strooood on Friday, August 1, 2008, 13:00:35
uh-oh, big trouble.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Lumps on Friday, August 1, 2008, 13:28:36
  You're showing your age there Fogster....I reckon Norman Vaughan would get more runs in this match  :thumb:

Bringing this hilarity a bit more up to date then, what about Vince Vaughn? OK he's American with no more understanding of the rules of cricket than I have of that game of fancy rounders they play over there, but it couldn't hurt to ttry could it?

Anyway on my way to Manchester on Monday I'm going via Baslow so that I can scream some choice abuse at our captain's front door as I pass. 


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Lumps on Friday, August 1, 2008, 14:29:26
Oh jesus! Can we just stop now?


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: nevillew on Friday, August 1, 2008, 16:20:05
  You're showing your age there Fogster....I reckon Norman Vaughan would get more runs in this match  :thumb:

The smilie is a work of genius there Reg.  A fertile imagination at work - you might even say "roses grow on you "


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Boeta on Friday, August 1, 2008, 16:21:40
collingwood is looking like a batsman for the first time in 18 months. scary.

pietersen is a freak.

here's what one my mates said about bell:

Quote
For the umpteenth time in a pressure situation when his side badly needs him to make a big score, Ian Bell fails to deliver and limply gives his wicket away. I've criticised him a lot lately but that's because he's wasting the talent he clearly has.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: axs on Friday, August 1, 2008, 16:22:33
If that is the case what the hell are KP,Virgil and Collingwood doing in the team as their primary objection is to score runs! Billy Big bollocks KP is the one that needs to go back to county cricket and stop batting like a tosser.   

looks like he listened.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: donkey on Friday, August 1, 2008, 16:27:44
Looks like he's out...


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: axs on Friday, August 1, 2008, 16:28:40
shit, jinxed that one.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Rich Pullen on Friday, August 1, 2008, 16:29:34
I'm happy that Collingwood has reached 50 though.

Flintoff will hopefully prove me wrong and bat a good steady performance.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: axs on Friday, August 1, 2008, 16:31:20
or not.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Rich Pullen on Friday, August 1, 2008, 16:31:36
I'm happy that Collingwood has reached 50 though.

Flintoff will hopefully prove me wrong and bat a good steady performance with the bat.

Quelle suprise. Silly.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Rich Pullen on Friday, August 1, 2008, 16:36:05
(yes some glances of old form) in these two test matches Flintoff still hasn't justified his selection.

Prove me wrong Flintoff - prove me wrong.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Friday, August 1, 2008, 16:39:33
Flintoff's bowling's been good, his batting less so. As we knew it would be. He's a reverse Broad.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Friday, August 1, 2008, 16:40:02
OMG Vaughan actually managed double figures? What the hell is going on? Good knock from KP and Colly (proving me wrong after my rant the other day) but the rest have been shite again as usual. Complete wasters.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Rich Pullen on Friday, August 1, 2008, 16:40:30
He's a reverse Broad.

We need his batting form today/tomorrow. Shame.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Friday, August 1, 2008, 16:46:11
The problem with this team is, whenever anyones on the edge of being dropped (Collingwood) they'll get a big innings so we can't drop them.

Vaughan and Ambrose will undoubtedly manage to scrape something in the Fourth Test.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Friday, August 1, 2008, 17:04:35
The problem with this team is, whenever anyones on the edge of being dropped (Collingwood) they'll get a big innings so we can't drop them.

Vaughan and Ambrose will undoubtedly manage to scrape something in the Fourth Test.

But that's the point. We shouldn't give them another chance. Colly should never have been recalled for this test.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Friday, August 1, 2008, 17:57:51
Awesome, Collingwood just showed Pietersen how getting to 100 with a 6 works :D


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Rich Pullen on Friday, August 1, 2008, 18:03:28
Sensible support from Ambrose too.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: axs on Friday, August 1, 2008, 18:09:12
we're still in with a shot here, if Freddie and Monty can do anything with the ball tomorrow.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: larwood on Friday, August 1, 2008, 18:18:44
At last a bit of resistance!!Would be a great knock by colly at any time but especially when you consider the circumstances its even better.





Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: axs on Friday, August 1, 2008, 18:24:00
just watching the highlights on 5, great catch by vaughan for the last wicket.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Friday, August 1, 2008, 18:27:37
just watching the highlights on 5, great catch by vaughan for the last wicket.

 All in all England have had a decent day, but still a lot to do to get a winning position, I reckon we need a minimum 60 to 70 more, with a new ball due in the morning.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: axs on Friday, August 1, 2008, 18:40:34
I was thinking we need 370 to be in with a decent chance too.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Bogus Dave on Friday, August 1, 2008, 19:04:51
why do our batsmen bat like 'tards at times. wtf was cook doing! and alec stewart sounded as if he was going to give himself a hernia when kp got out haha


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Boeta on Friday, August 1, 2008, 21:34:26
(yes some glances of old form) in these two test matches Flintoff still hasn't justified his selection.

Prove me wrong Flintoff - prove me wrong.
are you mental? did you see his spell last night?

not only was it one of the best spells of fast bowling you could ever wish to see, but it also turned this back into a game


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Rich Pullen on Friday, August 1, 2008, 21:35:50
are you mental? did you see his spell last night?

not only was it one of the best spells of fast bowling you could ever wish to see, but it also turned this back into a game

Yes I am, yes I did and it was just a spell, a very good spell I grant you - I need to see more before I get carried away.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Boeta on Friday, August 1, 2008, 21:40:32
surely to justify his selection he needs to show he can perform at a higher level than any other bowler in england

can you show me anyone else that could have delivered a spell like it?


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Rich Pullen on Friday, August 1, 2008, 21:48:00
surely to justify his selection he needs to show he can perform at a higher level than any other bowler in england

can you show me anyone else that could have delivered a spell like it?

Anyone is capable of a 'spell' - I want the consistancy. The selection process wouldn't allow anyone else to get a go anyway.

But we are lacking in quality - Flintoff will always be in the mix as long as he wants to be... I've always said I'll be happy to be proved wrong.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: sonic youth on Friday, August 1, 2008, 22:14:12
no point arguing cricket with boeta.

fair play to collingwood, the transition from woefully out of form to a centurion must have taken immense mental strength. long may it continue.

kp's ego is lethal at times, the silly boy.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Rich Pullen on Friday, August 1, 2008, 22:19:30
I wasnee arguing with the Boeta :)


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: michael on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 08:18:48
fair play to collingwood, the transition from woefully out of form to a centurion must have taken immense mental strength. long may it continue.

That's exactly what you get with Collingwood. The man is a Spartan, like myself.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Bogus Dave on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 10:01:01
well ambrose lasted long.

all out for under 320


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 10:01:40
Ambrose lasted a minute.

What I wouldn't do to have Stewie Broad wandering out instead of Stringfellow.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Spencer_White on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 12:59:20
For those without sky, http://cricketonpc.blogspot.com/

sky look to be closing in on these sites, they have been taken off chavster. But they will keep going. Its the future!


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: strooood on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 14:09:43
we could do this you know.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 14:21:51
Need to get Smiffy soon.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 14:24:46
Prince will do :D


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: dell boy on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 14:25:57
98-4


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: michael on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 14:27:15
How many overs left today?


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: dell boy on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 14:28:06
How many overs left today?
About 40, and its 93-4 not 98


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 14:54:20
We need to get rid of Smith and De Villers pretty sharpish.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Samdy Gray on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 14:57:29
Those Saffas aren't liking Flintoff very much are they? :D

Kallis' reaction to his lbw was priceless.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 15:12:50
Ramps is on 96 on his quest for the hundredth hundred.

What price him trying a KP?


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Bogus Dave on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 16:56:16
do tms know something we dont? 100 to get with 5 wickets in hand, and they are still saying we have a chance


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Spencer_White on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 18:29:06
Those Saffas aren't liking Flintoff very much are they? :D

Kallis' reaction to his lbw was priceless.

It reminded me of Sean Pollocks reaction when Gough got Donald lbw in the 1997 series clincher. And I thought that they would lose it after that. But unfortunately we are up against a man who is made of some stuff.

It was great (and refreshing) to see England go out and really fight for a test match. We didnt win, but at least we were always in it. Test match cricket needs 3 of these a summer, not just the one.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 18:29:21


   I suppose we made a game of it, first time I've seen us lose at home to the Saffas since 1965.

   Where do we go from here?  Ideal time for a change of captain.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: fatbury on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 18:35:11
Ideal time to get rid of Moores otherwise we will have the humilation of a defeat in the Carribean


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Reg Smeeton on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 18:39:27
Ideal time to get rid of Moores otherwise we will have the humilation of a defeat in the Carribean

 I wouldn't necessarily disagree....maybe he should be given an opportunity to pick his own captain though.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 19:24:05
If you mean in the Stanford match, I would love them to lose that.

I want England to win every other game they play in, but if they lost the winner takes all mercenary match, that would amuse me greatly.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 20:48:34
It's almost like going back to the dark days of the 90s under Atherton. OK it's not quite that bad but if it carries on it will be. We need change. The only problem is if we don't change now (ie this summer) then it will be too late for next summer's Ashes. There is clearly a problem with selection and Vaughan has clearly now had his time. He's had 3 years since the Ashes triumph of 2005 and he's done nothing since whilst his batting gets worse. Then there is the issue of Moores. Dare i say the Duncan Fletcher days were a lot better than these.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 20:59:54
Some chap on radio from a paper reckons Vaughan will resign tomorrow.

I reckon that's just wishful thinking on his part, he didn't sound too keen. I'm mixed, I've grown up with Michael Vaughan being a classy player and captain, but he's just not been the same since he returned from injury really.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Rich Pullen on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 21:06:31
Got to be ruthless - Vaughan has got to go, for the sake of both himself and English cricket... His legacy could've/should've been all about the 2005 Ashes but this downward spiral will not be forgotten.

Who should be the next captain? (if Vaughan was to do the right thing here and stand down)


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 21:07:50
He's fucking shocking. Does he even care anymore? Tbh he's been pretty wank for most of his career bar a few really good summers and a few decent winter tours. Lost the plot after he got the captaincy role and was number 1 in the world rankings.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 21:08:27
Got to be ruthless - Vaughan has got to go, for the sake of both himself and English cricket... His legacy could've/should've been all about the 2005 Ashes but it'll this downward spiral will not be forgotten.

Who should be the next captain? (if Vaughan was to do the right thing here and stand down)

Totally agree and that's the next problem. Who the hell should get a go next. I wouldn't choose any of them tbh.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Nemo on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 21:27:33
Strauss for a few years until Cook is ready.

If it goes to Flintoff or KP i'll cry.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: leefer on Saturday, August 2, 2008, 21:35:01
Collingwood for me....a fighter and not afraid to say what he feels,think KP will get the nod though.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: larwood on Sunday, August 3, 2008, 06:27:42
Should be Strauss.We don't really want to be putting any more pressure on Kp or Freddie and Cook is too young for the moment.Colly was on the verge of being dropped before his century so wouldn't make any sense to make him skipper.

 Of course its all presuming Vaughan gets dropped[which i doubt] I'd love to see Shah get a chance in his place,not many other options out there??


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: alanmayes on Sunday, August 3, 2008, 08:10:43
I really hope that this morning Michael Vaughan announces his retirement from International cricket.
He's been a good captain,but his time has passed as a player and he needs to do the honourable thing.
My choice would be Strauss,he'd have the final test at the Oval and then the tour to the West Indies.

We need to rebuild the side,which should have been done after the debacle of the tour to Australia.
There are problems in all areas of the side,but i'd start with the batting and bring in Owais Shah and
Joe Denly.Although he'll probably stay in the side i'm not convinced with Ambrose.Steve Davies (Worcs)
looks a good prospect as a keeper/batsman and i hope he makes the winter tour.

It was interesting to hear Goughie on Five Live's cricket night last thursday.He said that there is a
clique within the England team and as much as he likes him,Vaughan's best mates are Colly and
Ashley Giles (National Selector) and that hasn't helped,when making hard choices about team selections.

Well done to Ramps,you finally got there!

ECB have called a press conference for Sunday 1pm!


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: fatbury on Sunday, August 3, 2008, 08:45:09
Rob Key to replace Vaughan .. and as captain


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: michael on Sunday, August 3, 2008, 09:18:20
We need to rebuild the side,which should have been done after the debacle of the tour to Australia.
There are problems in all areas of the side,but i'd start with the batting and bring in Owais Shah and
Joe Denly.Although he'll probably stay in the side i'm not convinced with Ambrose.Steve Davies (Worcs)
looks a good prospect as a keeper/batsman and i hope he makes the winter tour.

Shah definitely. Joe Denly has had some decent innings in the county game this season, but then so has Tim Ambrose! I think Denly is worth looking at though as he is someone who could potentially play Test, ODI's and T20 too.

How frustrating is Ian Bell? All the ability in the world and an absolute dream to watch, but constantly doing stupid things to get himself out.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Bogus Dave on Sunday, August 3, 2008, 15:02:14
He's fucking shocking. Does he even care anymore? Tbh he's been pretty wank for most of his career bar a few really good summers and a few decent winter tours. Lost the plot after he got the captaincy role and was number 1 in the world rankings.

hahahahahhahahahah


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Sunday, August 3, 2008, 16:24:29
So Vaughan has quit then (thank fuck for that) and Colly has quite the one day captaincy as well. So Vaughan won't play at The Oval. Perfect chance to bring someone like Denly in.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: cib on Sunday, August 3, 2008, 22:06:48
My choice would be Strauss,he'd have the final test at the Oval and then the tour to the West Indies.

Well we're going to India at the end of the year so hopefully the captain for the Oval test will be the same for that not just for Windies next Feb!


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Foggy on Monday, August 4, 2008, 07:29:43
Rob Key to replace Vaughan .. and as captain

Well blow me down, Fatters has finally spoken sense. Take a bow that man.


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: Lumps on Monday, August 4, 2008, 11:43:09
If it goes to Flintoff or KP i'll cry.

I'd have some tissues ready if I was you


Title: Re: Third Test Thread
Post by: janaage on Monday, August 4, 2008, 11:48:25
I'd go for Eugene from Big Brother 6.  Failing that Ant or Dec, not sure which one though.