Title: hampton & richmond Post by: juddie on Monday, July 21, 2008, 16:27:57 anyone going tomorrow night?
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Weasel on Monday, July 21, 2008, 18:11:55 i don't know where either of them are.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: donkey on Monday, July 21, 2008, 18:16:23 I can tell you that Swindon Supporters beat H&R Supporters 2-0 on Saturday...I expect no less from the pros.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: suttonred on Monday, July 21, 2008, 18:19:30 Yes I'll be there, only about 25 mins drive for me.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: juddie on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 13:13:46 2.3 miles from my office. would be rude for me not to.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: suttonred on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 13:31:14 Seems to be a fair few from MOS board going also, reckon there will be a hoard of around a dozen of us!
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 13:32:56 2.3 miles from my office. would be rude for me not to. To be precise ;) Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: juddie on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 14:07:46 god bless AA auto route JFW!
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: tans on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 14:48:43 you need aa autoroute for a 2 mile journey?
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: tans on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 14:54:08 to be honest with that squad theyve put out, even though its a friendly, i wont be impressed if we dont win by at least 5 goals.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: axs on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 16:37:48 to be honest with that squad theyve put out, even though its a friendly, i wont be impressed if we dont win by at least 5 goals. why does that sound to me like you won't be impressed if we lose 5-0? Too many negatives confuse me. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Batch on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 16:41:14 why does that sound to me like you won't be impressed if we lose 5-0? Too many negatives confuse me. You're not not wrong there. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: axs on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 16:42:20 thanks.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 18:33:50 Line-up announced.
Swindon Town: Peter Brezovan; Kevin Amankwaah, Jerel Ifil, Patrick Kanyuka, Jamie Vincent; Mark Marshall, Jon-Paul McGovern, Michael Timlin, Anthony McNamee, Billy Paynter, Simon Cox Substitutes: Phil Smith, Jack Smith, John Hills, Blair Sturrock, Ben Joyce, Sean Morrison, Michael Pook. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Bob's Orange on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 18:39:16 2-0 win tonight. Cox and Kanyuka on target.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: glos_robin on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 18:39:32 I reckon that'll be pretty much our starting line-up for the Tranmere game to be honest except for Easton replacing Marshall............oh and possibly Aljofree back in defence.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 18:46:48 First friendly on the season that we're expected to win.... Very strong line-up too.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: michael on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 18:52:11 Are we winning yet?
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Bob's Orange on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 19:17:50 Anything happening?
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 19:19:35 Anything happening? Well we're not playing a team of note... therefore tumbleweed emerges. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Bob's Orange on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 19:21:26 Well we're not playing a team of note... therefore tumbleweed emerges. We're playing 2 teams tonight so we're doing quite well to hold out!! Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: michael on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 19:24:11 Are we drawing then?
I have done some research and learnt that Hampton & Richmond are in the Blue Square South, which makes them even worse than Oxford. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 19:25:56 No update thus far - I'd imagine it's level.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 19:32:02 I got the impression on the OS that there will not be an update until after the game.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Peter Venkman on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 19:33:54 I got the impression on the OS that there will not be an update until after the game. Yeah thats how I read it too. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 19:33:59 I got the impression on the OS that there will not be an update until after the game. They normally do a H-T score though... Even for the non-league opposition. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Bob's Orange on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 19:37:23 1-0 at half time
http://www.thisisswindontownfc.co.uk/display.var.2406586.0.latest_score_hampton_richmond_0_swindon_town_1.php Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Weasel on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 19:37:45 one nil. Cox. Trialist assist
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 19:38:43 Cox again, good lad.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 19:44:26 "who is the oaf that writes these reports?,poor grammer and imcomprehensable sentences, probably stands in the bar and tells everybody about his degree in media studies from some naff poly!"
Erm OK then. Oh and good stuff. 5 in 5 for Cox. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 20:35:07 2-1 Full Time - Cox got the second.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 20:36:11 The only thing that worries me: "Cox - the only Town player to net during pre-season "
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 20:38:44 The only thing that worries me: "Cox - the only Town player to net during pre-season " We better sign Ghionea up then! You're right though 5 games 7 goals 6 for Cox. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 20:39:15 im abit worried that we've only beaten hampton and richmond 2-1 with a full strength side
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 20:39:59 im abit worried that we've only beaten hampton and richmond 2-1 with a full strength side I'm not. Salisbury and Chippenham all this week. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 20:42:51 yes but still...
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Luci on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 20:43:34 From the impression I got from those that were there, Marshall looked pretty damn good! Interesting to hear their views when they get back.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Luci on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 20:44:22 yes but still... Are you concerned that a strong Villa side only drew with Walsall earlier too? Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 20:44:38 Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: michael on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 20:44:57 We better sign Ghionea up then! You're right though 5 games 7 goals 6 for Cox. Who is Ghionea? Sorry if I am being dim. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: wheretherealredsare on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 20:46:14 I'm a bit worried that other people seem to get in first and grab the best bits to worry about and there will be nothing left to worry a bit about ...
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 20:47:21 Who is Ghionea? Sorry if I am being dim. He got the only goal for Town this summer that Cox didn't score. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: michael on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 20:48:20 They're only a bit worried though, feel free to be slightly concerned or perhaps even anxious
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 20:50:16 i dont care about villa. i know pre-season is all about getting fitness up, but i'd say its still fair enough to suggest that a league one team would hope to beat a team not even in the blue square south pretty comfortably. I guess they're in a no-win situation with regards to the result, but this hardly makes me cock-a-hoop
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 20:50:27 They're only a bit worried though, feel free to be slightly concerned or perhaps even anxious Could this be something we will potentially have to get used to? (Hoping I'm wrong - we need a goal minded central midfielder though) Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: wheretherealredsare on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 20:51:46 Palpitations OK?
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: flammableBen on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 20:55:36 Pre-season friendly scores are never much of an indication of anything. It's more about looking at the players in different systems with trialists and new signings whilst getting fitness and match sharpness and stuff.
Results wise, I've got vague memory's of having a storming pre-season before 00/01. Whilst having a comparatively poor one before 03/04 or whenever our playoff season was. Although I'm not claiming to have a good memory and could be wrong. It's more about getting some run-outs against a mix of opposition rather than beating teams. Which is why our relegation season really was a terrible set of friendlies. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: wheretherealredsare on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 20:56:47 We don't need Ghionea or any other nasty STD's thank you very much.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: suttonred on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 21:17:32 We played pretty well, they had a decent defence but not much else. Marshall was very good particularly 2nd half, definately got something. Spoke with Jeremy Wray(who i said thanks for all youv'e done Nick!!) He quickly pointed out he's the other bald geezer. Spoke to MM (player coming down tomorrow) Had a chat with Blair and Ben Joyce, I'll post more on those tomorrow, but all in all we played well without that many clear cut chances. Best players Macca, Marshall and Kanyuka. amakwaah and Timlin and Cox also deserve mentions. Crowd of 300+ with around 70-80 Town.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: michael on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 21:18:33 Tell us now suttonred, tell us now!
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Reg Smeeton on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 21:22:55 We don't need Ghionea or any other nasty STD's thank you very much. Obviously we don't need the STD's, but I think the Romanian market might be worth tapping into......Lincoln City have done it. Adrian Petulea, whose career started with Rapid Bucherest, begged Jackson for a trial. "He was spotted by the groundsman running around the training ground with his girlfriend on his back," said Jackson. "The trouble is his girlfriend was naked, which got the attention of the players." This is what is meant by wanting to play for the club. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Nemo on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 21:29:18 That's awesome, sign that chap.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: wheretherealredsare on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 21:31:16 Messing around with naked east European women ... this is how they'll end up with Ghionea!
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Reg Smeeton on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 21:37:00 Messing around with naked east European women ... this is how they'll end up with Ghionea! Think an outbreak of Viorel Moldovan would be more scary. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: suttonred on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 21:39:54 Tell us now suttonred, tell us now! Ok ok. Jeremy Wray was saying they could understand why season tickets were slow but were hoping for a rush, he was quite surprised when i said how many london based fans we had and that most were still to buy in the next week or two. He had his wallet out for a business card, and i asked if he was giving any away. he said sorry its bloody empty i've spent it all! MM was very polite and spoke to my daughter encouraging her to sing loudly. not sure who the player is, didn't like to push things. Spoke to Blair about Marshall mainly and he was impressed but wasn't sure if him and macca weren't too alike to play together, may be a bit cavalier and leave us exposed, but he did look pretty good. Said his wrist was nearly there and said goodbye to my daughter, nice guy. To cap it all just looked at O/s and there is a photo of my daughter, a first game to remember for her. JW and MM were on the terracing before the game so i'm guessing others still on the way back may have asked more in depth questions than me, but overall over the moon they all took the time to speak to us all.Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: michael on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 21:54:35 Did John Hills get a run out at all?
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: michael on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 21:54:47 (nice story by the way)
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: suttonred on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 21:57:55 No Hills didn't play Vincent left back until about 65th min when jack Smith came on, Vincent actually did one blinding run to virtually the goal line from our own half, nearly spilled my pint.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: wheretherealredsare on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 22:06:36 Think an outbreak of Viorel Moldovan would be more scary. Can I be the first to be a bit worried? ... and according to the OS Hills came on for the last 30 mins????? Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Iffy's Onion Bhaji on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 22:07:32 No Hills didn't play Vincent left back until about 65th min when jack Smith came on, Vincent actually did one blinding run to virtually the goal line from our own half, nearly spilled my pint. He made a good run on Friday night as well. What's got into him? Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: juddie on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 22:09:23 Me and my old chap got there really early and we also spoke to budgie and Jeremy Wray. Annoyingly I didn't ask too many searching questions, but what struck me was how relaxed everybody was. Budgie got two lads on to the pitch to warm up with the lads, Mo Mo was happy to talk to all and sundry, although he looked as though he hadn't slept for some time - his eyes could piss holes in the snow! All were very friendly and happy to chat... I made the point to all that new faces are needed if we're to breach 6,000.
The game itself? Not massively convincing, but like I said to my old man, a) whatever players say, they're not going to give as much playing non-league opposition as they are teams like portsmouth and b) austria was mental. I spoke to Dick Mackey and he was saying it was a case of train in the morning, train in the afternoon (hard), then get up up, drive 3 hours to somewhere new, play a game, get up, train etc. I think the boys, while they look incredibly fit (not like that), they might also be a bit knackered. Amankwaah was dreadful. He ran the ball out of play on one occassion. Just dreadful. H & R had chances and I didn't feel Ifil and Kanyuka were as solid as Ifil and Aljofree. In saying that, Kanyuka does like to bring the ball out from the back and not hoof it, which is good. He will offer good competition, and then there's the big young kid (I forget his name). He's a huge bloke! Vincent: Meh. I don't like him and he spent the game looking for his predictable little dink down the line. Did do an amazing run though, beat about 65 players before crossing to no-one. McNamee: what more needs to be said; great dribbling, good distribution, good speed. Timlin and McGovern: decent, but my one worry is that if easton's injured, McGovern looks likely to start in the middle, and he's no centre midfielder. He sprayed some nice passes about and we looked ok, but didn't dominate. Marshall: hhhmmmm. Tough to call. Showed glimpses of billiance but no where near as consistent as McNamee. He's quick, skilful and direct, but would frustrate in equal measure. Better than Ricky Shakes, but maybe too light weight? Cox: he's awesome. scored two and could have 42. Paynter: not sure. Holds ball up well and superb with back to goal, but doesn't get in scoring positions enough for me... Played ok. Other than that, a lovely little club and a nice summer's evening - good to watch the Reds in action again. FourFourTwo were out in force so might be some stuff on their site later this week. A good evening but one thing's clear: we need more bodies. But the core of the team: Brez, Ifil, McNamee and Cox look red hot. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: suttonred on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 22:11:09 Can I be the first to be a bit worried? No its wrong it was Jack Smith for Vincent, I never saw Hills there, Pook, Blair, Smith and Joyce were the subs... and according to the OS Hills came on for the last 30 mins????? Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: suttonred on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 22:14:52 Amankwaah was dreadful. He ran the ball out of play on one occassion. Just dreadful.
Dont agree with that he wasn't dreadful, I thought he did pretty well, always helping JPM and Marshall, and cant remember anyone going past him the whole game. Different viewpoints eh! Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Reg Smeeton on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 22:16:38 Can I be the first to be a bit worried? There was a nasty case of Viorel Moldovan at Coventry in 97/98....but it moved away to more traditional grounds in Turkey. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Batch on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 22:17:46 Thanks for the reports Laanduners.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: mexico red on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 22:19:46 hills came on for vincent, i will let you off sutton they look pretty similar :)
well we totaly controlled the game, played good passing football to feet and looked very structured. Brezovan, didnt really have to do much, his kicking with both feet has improved tenfold. He had no chance with the goal. Anawanker- good going forward linked up well in good triangles with Mcgovern and Marshall, looks to play the ball on the floor. He wasnt really tested defence wise, have a feeling he might not be ideal. Kanyuka - Fuck me hes a giant. I will put my neck on the line and say he will score at least 5 from corners ala ooh shaun taylor. won absolutely everything in the air. very very vocal, bossed the defence around, however........ a couple of major errors, a dodgy back pass that should have been punished, plus he was at fault for there goal, he went arse over tit. I can see him however starting against tranmere due to his aerial presence. Ifil- was ifil, touches of brilliance with fucking circus like defending at times. Vincent - now i have always been a fan of him but today he was off the pace, got caught out 5 or 6 times in first half but eventually settled down and did a maradona like run towards half time that would have been similar to the cheating argie cunt against us in 86 if it had gone in. Substituted half way through second half for Hills who looks like a jack smith clone. Marshall - Sign him up. Showed flashes of macnamee like brilliance and he has to be the quickest player i have ever seen in a swindon shirt. swung in a couple of corking crosses that cox should have buried. He needs work on certain aspects of his play and he definately is a rough diamond but fuck me hes great to watch. The second goal was due to a rocket from 30 yards from marshall that the keeper couldnt hold on to and cox twatted it in. my man of the match. Mcgovern - Played in the deeper centre midfield role and played very well great distribution and pairing up with... Timlin - run marshall close for man of the match. good tackling great vision and passing and denied a goal by a blatant handball on the line. well played. Macnamee - didnt really get the rub of the green and rather worringly limped off in the second half as he was totally clattered. not good watching him hobble round the pitchside. Cox - constant threat. a right gobby shit. but our gobby shit:) should have had a hattrick in first half. greedy fucker. ace. Paynter - toiled. thats the only way i can describe his performance. worked hard but not much seemed to come off. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: juddie on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 22:25:13 comedy. three of us went, three different opinions!
That's what it's all about. I'll give you Timlin and McGov, but I still don;t get the feeling that either could grab the scruff of a game and boss it, especially if it's niggly. Amankwaah: I'm sticking by my guns. Yeah, he passed well when under no pressure and made himself available, but IMO he's not better than Smith, and so seemes an odd signing. Hope he proves me wrong. Anyuka: yeah he is mahoosive and dominated in the air like aljofree. Prone to dropping the odd bollock and if paired with ifil, there'll always be a feeling they could give the ball away in a key area. BUT strong as an ox and likes to play the simple ball. Decent, very decent. Cox looks awesome at the moment. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: mexico red on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 22:26:54 oh one other thing, they had a tuck shop. fucking lush. i had flying saucers, chery drops and fruit salads. and some lush white mice.
In traditional tef fashion i approached nick watkins and could have asked him about new signings plans for the future ala ground redevelopement. but i asked one question only. why havent we got a tuck shop? he said he would look into it :) Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: mexico red on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 22:28:53 Juddie i agree with all your points there, anawanker does seem a strange signing, he does however add height at defending corners.
cox is going to score lots of goals Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: juddie on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 22:32:19 The tuck shop, oh my days!!!!! first of all the food was ood, burgers and the like, I think my old man mentioned that to Jeremy Wray, but the tuck shop was immense. H & R seems a cool little club with a huge emphasis on kids, tuck shop wouldn;t go amiss along with some kind of junior robins membership or something?
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Batch on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 22:33:22 Good to see Marshall was better than Friday. I guess as Juddie says it'll come down to whether we can have two luxury players of a similar nature in the same team.
Did nayone else other than Cox look like scoring? It does worry me how we'll cope when the opposition double up on him and McNamee. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: mexico red on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 22:36:00 dont worry we will score shit loads.
going up as champions :) Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: juddie on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 22:40:06 if plan A works we could score a hatful, but I'm worried we have no plan b. Tonight Timlin and McGov always wanted to spray it wide - better teams will cut out that supply.
And, if we play a big and aggressive team McNamee, Marshall and Timlin will go missing. We don't yet have a player willing to gamble and get in front of the two strikers. For me cox and cor is the front pairing, but we need one of our midfielders to gamble. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: juddie on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 22:41:01 havin said all that, Cox will score 20+. I'm gonna put money on it. He;s not just scoring, he's looking sharper than a razor blade and he's always in scoring positions.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Simon Pieman on Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 22:55:19 I thought Timlin was excellent against Pompey and they're a massive team who got stuck in.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 06:27:55 Totally agree with Mex's post, and about the tuck shop, my daughter got well sugared up, although i reckon you or i had too many dib dabs, as the tannoy said smith and i spoke to him at a throw in after he came on for vincent. Mind you my eye site after calling Jeremy Wray, Nick!!
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: ronnie21 on Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 07:26:41 In traditional tef fashion i approached nick watkins and could have asked him about new signings plans for the future ala ground redevelopement. but i asked one question only. why havent we got a tuck shop? You approached Nick Watkins? It was probably Jeremy Wray, Nick is away on hols for a week!!he said he would look into it :) Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: mexico red on Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 07:58:03 it was probably just some bald hampton fan in a suit.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Ardiles on Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 08:12:39 Thanks for the summaries, chaps. Glad your girl enjoyed her first game, Sutton.
(And sorry I couldn't join you. If you're on the e-mails that will, no doubt, be doing the rounds later, I'll explain why.) Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: reeves4england on Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 11:14:19 Good to see Marshall was better than Friday. I guess as Juddie says it'll come down to whether we can have two luxury players of a similar nature in the same team. If they decide to double up on Macca AND on Cox that's going to leave gaping holes across the rest of the pitch. I'm not worried at all!Did nayone else other than Cox look like scoring? It does worry me how we'll cope when the opposition double up on him and McNamee. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 11:17:28 If they decide to double up on Macca AND on Cox that's going to leave gaping holes across the rest of the pitch. I'm not worried at all! Exactly thats why he may be looking at Nalis to play a holding/enforcer role, so the other two can tear up the wingsTitle: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: alanmayes on Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 11:38:55 I really enjoyed the game at Hampton,football was a bit helter skelter at times,but a good work
out for the lads.Nice to be able to have a good chat with Dave Byrne and Jeremy Wray before the game,both very approachable and friendly.They have a genuine interest in the views of the fans. Lovely warm,still summer evening for football,saw quite a few fans that i've known over the years, good to have a drink with and chat with them.Hope those of you that went enjoyed it. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: janaage on Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 11:58:29 What's this concern over teams "doubling up on Macca", use the ball well and you'd rip teams to shreds if they did that.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: juddie on Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 12:02:40 I don't think trams will 'double-team' macca, they'll just cotton on to the fact that our whole game involves getting the ball to the wide men and will stifle timlin and co. as a result.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: SwindonTartanArmy on Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 12:04:27 What's this concern over teams "doubling up on Macca", use the ball well and you'd rip teams to shreds if they did that. we might rip teams to shreds, but we still havent got anyone (apart from cox) who could hit a coos erse with a banjoTitle: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Bogus Dave on Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 12:10:29 i think if trams started doubling up on mcnamee things might get messy
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 19:08:12 Totally agree with Mex's post, and about the tuck shop, my daughter got well sugared up, although i reckon you or i had too many dib dabs, as the tannoy said smith and i spoke to him at a throw in after he came on for vincent. Mind you my eye site after calling Jeremy Wray, Nick!! Seen the photo now and fully admit i was wrong, after two serious incidents of mis identification in one game, I'm off to the opticians (if i can find it obv!)Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: axs on Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 21:49:44 thanks for the reports guys, interesting and positive stuff. looking forward to cardiff now.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: suttonred on Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 22:23:41 I really enjoyed the game at Hampton,football was a bit helter skelter at times,but a good work Were you the guy on crutches?out for the lads.Nice to be able to have a good chat with Dave Byrne and Jeremy Wray before the game,both very approachable and friendly.They have a genuine interest in the views of the fans. Lovely warm,still summer evening for football,saw quite a few fans that i've known over the years, good to have a drink with and chat with them.Hope those of you that went enjoyed it. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: alanmayes on Thursday, July 24, 2008, 05:52:29 Were you the guy on crutches? No that wasn't me.I actually spoke to Jeremy Wray directly after you.I did overhear you call him "Nick" but i could easily understand that,because there is a similarity between them.I put it down to your cool wrap around sunglasses ;D Hope that your daughter is now a committed Town fan for the future. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: suttonred on Thursday, July 24, 2008, 06:29:53 I'm never going to live that down! Yes she'll be going to quite a few this year, I've just got to work on her to go to the cricket now!
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: alanmayes on Thursday, July 24, 2008, 15:41:38 Sutton,
Good to hear that your daughter wants to watch the Town.With regards to cricket,if she gets used to watching some local club cricket,then a trip to watch Surrey at Whitgift College would be easy for you and i'm sure it's more child friendly and a better environment for her, than at the Oval. Big bouncy castle and she'll be hooked! Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: suttonred on Thursday, July 24, 2008, 15:58:25 Thanks I'll do that Whitgift is only 2 or 3 miles from me.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: alanmayes on Thursday, July 24, 2008, 17:02:26 Next summer,if you want to take your daughter to the most picturesque ground in the country
and to have a great day out,take her to Arundel. It's just by the castle and on the other side,views over the Sussex downs.Very child friendly. Sussex played Hampshire there last week,well worth a visit and one for the diary,i'd suggest. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Sussex on Thursday, July 24, 2008, 17:21:48 Next summer,if you want to take your daughter to the most picturesque ground in the country and to have a great day out,take her to Arundel. It's just by the castle and on the other side,views over the Sussex downs.Very child friendly. Sussex played Hampshire there last week,well worth a visit and one for the diary,i'd suggest. And if you take a wander past the castle up to the lake you can get an ice cream at the cafe and buy food to feed the ducks. Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: mexico red on Friday, July 25, 2008, 00:04:20 i was at arundel last week, its now me and my dads definate summer date in the diary, 5 days of sunshine and two victories. you cant beat sussex at arundel castle.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: Bob's Orange on Friday, July 25, 2008, 16:10:43 I've been to Fontwell races before which I believe is quite close to Arundel.
Title: Re: hampton & richmond Post by: alanmayes on Saturday, July 26, 2008, 13:09:30 I've been to Fontwell races before which I believe is quite close to Arundel. Fontwell is often regarded as "The jewel of West Sussex" lovely small racecourse. |