|
Title: Blair Sturrock Post by: DiV on Sunday, December 10, 2006, 13:44:34 I see he was on the bench yesterday, so must have signed some sort contract.
Anyone know if its a short term deal (weeks?) as cover while Peacock and Brownlie are injured. Then he will continue on trail or earn an extended deal Or has he signed something more long term (months/end of the season) and he's now a proper town player? Title: Blair Sturrock Post by: Rich Pullen on Sunday, December 10, 2006, 14:27:45 It's all been a little bit hush-hush.
It'll be a monthly contract probably. Title: Blair Sturrock Post by: Sussex on Sunday, December 10, 2006, 14:54:59 Shirt no. 22 according to OS.
Title: Blair Sturrock Post by: DiV on Sunday, December 10, 2006, 15:33:12 I gathered that when yesterday they read out 'number 22 blair sturrock'
at least he wasnt given the cursed number 14 shirt... Title: Blair Sturrock Post by: Sussex on Sunday, December 10, 2006, 15:40:54 I wasn't there to hear it, apologies.
Title: Blair Sturrock Post by: DiV on Sunday, December 10, 2006, 15:44:05 accepted :D
So they added him to the squad on the OS but not mentioned anything about him actually signing Title: Blair Sturrock Post by: STFC_Gazza on Sunday, December 10, 2006, 16:24:07 I've heard its a pay as you play so he can talk to other clubs if need be?
Title: Blair Sturrock Post by: millom red on Sunday, December 10, 2006, 16:52:30 Quote from: "STFC_Gazza" I've heard its a pay as you play so he can talk to other clubs if need be? That make sense. Does'nt leave King Luggy open for criticism. Millom Title: Blair Sturrock Post by: Frigby Daser on Sunday, December 10, 2006, 23:54:39 It was him or Jake Hyde for the bench by the sounds of it - 4 strikers injured (if you count Caton and Holgate)
Title: Blair Sturrock Post by: fatbury on Monday, December 11, 2006, 14:31:03 Might get 22 STURROCK on my home shirt - serves a dual purpose!
Title: Blair Sturrock Post by: adje on Monday, December 11, 2006, 19:53:05 Another Nicky Summerbee situation......as Glenn Hoddle might say
Title: Blair Sturrock Post by: Bartek on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 15:49:51 Don't you think it's kind of nephotism ? Ehh...father on the bench and son of the pitch...
Title: Blair Sturrock Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 17:34:30 Quote from: "Bartek" Don't you think it's kind of nep(h)otism ? Ehh...father on the bench and son of the pitch... Yep....Sturrock must go... backing the Board just confirms it. Title: Blair Sturrock Post by: ron dodgers on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:22:11 nephotism would be if Blair was his sisters son
Title: Blair Sturrock Post by: lebowski on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 18:48:59 he's non-contract, which (i think) means that he isn't on a wage, but does get his expenses paid.
good luck with that! Title: Blair Sturrock Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 19:01:45 Quote from: "lebowski" he's non-contract, which (i think) means that he isn't on a wage, but does get his expenses paid. good luck with that! In my experience that means a "pay per play" deal. No pay if injured etc, so in his best interests to make the big impression. At least that's what happened to me (not at this level obviously) Title: Blair Sturrock Post by: lebowski on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 19:06:58 i stand corrected then!
Title: Blair Sturrock Post by: Fred Elliot on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 19:09:25 sorry lebowski
didnt mean it to sound like that fella ! :oops: It will probably be a set figure per game and then discretionary win/goal bonuses etc Title: Blair Sturrock Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, December 14, 2006, 20:29:42 Well, could be worse we could have got Stephen McMahon jnr if his dad had stayed longer.
|