|
Title: Matthew Heywood Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, July 27, 2006, 12:54:52 Just read that Matt Heywood has joined Brentford on a months loan.
Apologies if this has been posted already. So much for that security he was looking for. Title: Matthew Heywood Post by: Piemonte on Thursday, July 27, 2006, 12:56:35 ....... but the season dosn't start for 2 weeks :? :?
Title: Matthew Heywood Post by: Rich Pullen on Thursday, July 27, 2006, 13:01:29 Quote from: "Piemonte" ....... but the season dosn't start for 2 weeks :? :? I think it's in view... Checked the BCFC official site. Looks like Johnson doesn't rate him. http://www.bcfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/News/NewsDetail/0,,10327~873109,00.html Title: Matthew Heywood Post by: Spud on Thursday, July 27, 2006, 13:35:40 Sade, will be disappointed.
Title: Matthew Heywood Post by: ron dodgers on Thursday, July 27, 2006, 14:46:08 he's still got 2 years left on his Shitty contract - he aint bothered!
Title: Matthew Heywood Post by: Reg Smeeton on Thursday, July 27, 2006, 15:13:27 Think he'd do a job in L2.....he spends more time at the CG than Ashton Gate, so may as well return.
Title: Matthew Heywood Post by: Bushey Boy on Thursday, July 27, 2006, 15:53:23 always thought he would be an ace defender under right guidance
Title: Matthew Heywood Post by: Piemonte on Thursday, July 27, 2006, 15:59:58 I'd have heywood back. no problem
Title: Matthew Heywood Post by: my-velocity on Thursday, July 27, 2006, 16:03:11 I'd have him back now with Wise and Poyet in charge, he would play much better under him.
Title: Matthew Heywood Post by: sonic youth on Thursday, July 27, 2006, 16:25:17 Quote from: "Piemonte" I'd have heywood back. no problem likewise, never had a problem with him and think he'd do a more than adequate job in league 2. i'd rate him higher than ifil without doubt. Title: Matthew Heywood Post by: Dazzza on Thursday, July 27, 2006, 18:15:30 Ditto, think he could quite easily do a decent job for us in League two.
Wonder what sort of fee Brizzle are going to look for, if any? Title: Matthew Heywood Post by: Stef Troll on Thursday, July 27, 2006, 18:38:42 He was too slow, and only played well from time to time. Much prefer to have Williams on board
Title: Matthew Heywood Post by: Kinky Tom on Thursday, July 27, 2006, 18:51:39 Quote from: "StefPol" He was too slow, and only played well from time to time. Much prefer to have Williams on board Yeah....but it's a squad game... Title: Matthew Heywood Post by: sonic youth on Thursday, July 27, 2006, 19:00:57 Quote from: "StefPol" He was too slow, and only played well from time to time. Much prefer to have Williams on board we need more than one central defender though and i doubt williams is much quicker than him as well! regardless of his lack of speed, i thought that for the most part he was fairly solid although he was prone to the odd howler. Title: Matthew Heywood Post by: adje on Thursday, July 27, 2006, 19:33:12 The sands of time seem to have clouded peoples judgement(sorry bout the mixed metaphor) but Heywood was absolute cack in his last 2 seasons for us.As already stated Williams is a far better bet
Title: Matthew Heywood Post by: Stef Troll on Thursday, July 27, 2006, 19:46:14 Quote from: "sonic youth" Quote from: "StefPol" He was too slow, and only played well from time to time. Much prefer to have Williams on board we need more than one central defender though and i doubt williams is much quicker than him as well! regardless of his lack of speed, i thought that for the most part he was fairly solid although he was prone to the odd howler. Fair cop Williams aint much quicker then fatty Heywood. However the one crucial factor which distinguishes between Williams and heywood is the fact that williams will be vocal and incontrol of the defence. Our recent problems in defence have been due to poor orgnisation and leadership. Heywood imo wouldn't add anything extra to the defence unless he is partnered by a quick defender who can marshall the defence. Heywood was bought by City to simply deal with set plays and add extra height to their small defence. He'd be a good squad player for Swindon, but i'd pt him behind Ifil, Williams and CCP (if CCP plays in defence.) Title: Matthew Heywood Post by: adje on Thursday, July 27, 2006, 20:29:44 Quote from: "StefPol" Quote from: "sonic youth" Quote from: "StefPol" He was too slow, and only played well from time to time. Much prefer to have Williams on board we need more than one central defender though and i doubt williams is much quicker than him as well! regardless of his lack of speed, i thought that for the most part he was fairly solid although he was prone to the odd howler. Fair cop Williams aint much quicker then fatty Heywood. However the one crucial factor which distinguishes between Williams and heywood is the fact that williams will be vocal and incontrol of the defence. Our recent problems in defence have been due to poor orgnisation and leadership. Heywood imo wouldn't add anything extra to the defence unless he is partnered by a quick defender who can marshall the defence. Heywood was bought by City to simply deal with set plays and add extra height to their small defence. He'd be a good squad player for Swindon, but i'd pt him behind Ifil, Williams and CCP (if CCP plays in defence.) In other words we'd be better off signing someone else! Title: Matthew Heywood Post by: DiV on Thursday, July 27, 2006, 21:03:02 Matt Heywood
Solid as a rock when the balls 6ft 5 in the air. Usless as a chocolate teapot when the balls on the floor. If you combined his areial ability and position sense with Ifils, speed and recovery youd have a top class center half Title: Matthew Heywood Post by: DiV on Thursday, July 27, 2006, 21:04:02 Infact if youi combined then youd probably get Rio Ferdinand?!?!
|