We've had eight managers in the last ten years including six in the last five and where the fuck has that got us?
We sack Wilson, appoint whoever, a soon as we start playing badly, have a shit season we sack him and we start all over again.
Managers need to be given time.
Look at Moyes at Everton. He came in saved the club from relegation, next season they finished seventh, the season after that they had an horrendous season and finished 17th then the season after that finished 4th and by and large since then have been consistently in the top eight.
Chopping and changing managers lead to nowhere.
Christ! People don't like facts to get in the way of a line of argument do they? Read that and it sounds like Swindon are positively QPR-like in their approach to team management.
In fact, in the five year period you talk about, we've had five full time managers, only two of which were sacked, Malpas and King. Ignore the 5 month hiatus for the Terry Brady inspired ludicrous flirtation with Roy Evans, and Andy King was given over 4 years in charge of the team.
Which leaves Malpas, who was clearly a mistake. Anyone think he should have been given more time? .... Thought not.
Hardly a history of chopping a changing and sacking managers at the drop of a hat is it?
And your David Moyes comparison is just fucking stupid. Moyes manages a club that has been closer to the bottom than the top of their league for transfer funds available and wage bill. We're easily in the top 5 or 6 richest clubs in our league.
Do think Moyes would have survived the couple of seasons just avoiding relegation at Liverpool, Chelsea or even Spurs?
For this league we spent a proper chunk of money in the summer and more in the window, and are only outside the relegation zone because Tranmere can't seem to get through 90 minutes of football at the moment.
