Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Grunt Smith strikes back allegedly over loyalty jibes  (Read 5530 times)
JPC82

« Reply #45 on: Sunday, June 29, 2008, 15:05:04 »

just seen this thread from AGES ago!
haha how can RobertT say he wants Glos to be right when the link above states Howard wasnt offered a deal
Logged
axs
naaarrrrrppppp

Offline Offline

Posts: 13469





Ignore
« Reply #46 on: Sunday, June 29, 2008, 15:35:59 »

let it go.
Logged
Rich Pullen

« Reply #47 on: Sunday, June 29, 2008, 15:41:25 »

Why would you purposely look up a discussion from a time when it was at least a topic of debate (the fact Smith was playing against us), just to mock/get a reaction from RobertT. Are you that bored?

 :-))(
Logged
BANGKOK RED

« Reply #48 on: Sunday, June 29, 2008, 15:50:01 »

I was bored enough to look through the threads with no replies earlier.

I almost felt quite proud that I didn't see any of my threads on the list, until I realised that I have a tendancy to reply to my own threads.
Logged
JPC82

« Reply #49 on: Sunday, June 29, 2008, 15:58:04 »

Quote from: "Rich Pullen"
Why would you purposely look up a discussion from a time when it was at least a topic of debate (the fact Smith was playing against us), just to mock/get a reaction from RobertT. Are you that bored?

 :-))(


very bored
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #50 on: Sunday, June 29, 2008, 21:23:15 »

Quote from: "BANGKOK RED"
I was bored enough to look through the threads with no replies earlier.

I almost felt quite proud that I didn't see any of my threads on the list, until I realised that I have a tendancy to reply to my own threads.


   
Logged
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 11715




Ignore
« Reply #51 on: Sunday, June 29, 2008, 21:48:50 »

Quote from: "JPC82"
just seen this thread from AGES ago!
haha how can RobertT say he wants Glos to be right when the link above states Howard wasnt offered a deal


Clearly it went so far over your head it's taken a while to catch up with it.  My comment was not in anyway related to the facts or lack of in anyones statements.

Oh well, what was it all about anyway? (i refuse to click back a page)
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21289





Ignore
« Reply #52 on: Sunday, June 29, 2008, 21:56:50 »

wtf :?  who gives a fuck about this anyway?
dragging up an old thread that can be of relevance to the current time-yes.this one-why?
Logged
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36318




« Reply #53 on: Sunday, June 29, 2008, 21:58:20 »

I was clicking about on a few old threads and spotted the gem of a post I made about BEST holdings, which is now my signature.

And yes I was bored.
Logged
flammableBen

« Reply #54 on: Sunday, June 29, 2008, 21:59:11 »

'tis definitely a low point in the sport of thread resurrection.

Shame on you JPC.
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21289





Ignore
« Reply #55 on: Sunday, June 29, 2008, 21:59:47 »

but it is of relevance si pie. Wink  therefore making it valid imo.
Logged
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36318




« Reply #56 on: Sunday, June 29, 2008, 22:02:55 »

I like to think Fitton took my idea on board. Whether that's the reality I couldn't say either way, but I'd also like Glos to be right.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: