Thetownend.com

I know that this is the most invidious of our papers but it's interesting to note that on the day following the threat of a no-cooperation policy with the tabloids, the Mail are running four stories that are negative about the M+H.

I've no great love of the Royal Family but the constant harassment is horrible.

I know I shouldn't read it but it's best to keep your eye on them. Rather like OTIB!

They (the daily mail) are a fucking disgraceful organisation.

But it's a sad reflection on British society that so many people buy the fucking thing.

All newspapers are shit. All negative. Is there any reason to buy newspapers anymore?

Cracking paper.


It did a sterling job in the 2020 bog roll disappearance. Nice soft paper and the ink was wonderful at hiding skid marks from the wife on wash days.

The Daily / Sunday Sport classic headlines:

Hitler was a woman

World war 2 bomber found on the moon

Double decker bus found frozen in Antarctica.


And they had the nipple count in each edition, which always seemed to be an odd number.

(https://i.imgur.com/3FLMfdO.png)

Anyone remember when they did a countdown to Linsey Dawn McKensie turning 16 so she could get her tits out? I was 15 at the time, so it's fine that I remember. Had to prove it happened to a lad under 30 at work because he refused to believe it.

Pretty sure she's from Croydon. Which says it all really.

She did have massive milkers but she looked rough as arses from memory

Newquay in the early 90s  :)

Back to hating the daily mail:



(https://i.imgur.com/Rkly63w.png)

Katie Hopkins was wittering on about the NHS staff finding time to dance and record themselves. Evil hateful hag.

Vile thing

No words needed.

(https://i.imgur.com/GkOASew.jpg)

Scum rag

(https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-TY4kuBhwDls/XuYJkh3KhCI/AAAAAAABark/GTC8XT7hzzcgKkvvnFY0EsFt9c3O1MRSgCLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/Mail140620.png)

Firstly the fucking cheek, possibly years of inflammatory (often blatant bullshit) headlines could have stoked this.

Secondly, its very interesting to see the photograph they have chosen to use showing a clash between a black guy and a white guy*, further stoking the narrative that its some kind of race/culture clash.

*FWIW the picture was taken in Bristol and showed a black guy who was out with his missus being attacked.

Oh and thirdly, Johnson is the PM and thus has been in charge since day 1!

Just for clarification which is the black guy in that photo

From that photo the amoeba brain appears to be punching a woman being held back by a security guard. And that's as fucked up as it gets. Even if it is at an angle  hiding someone why print that?

The Daily Mail.

Winding people up over something that hasn't happened to something that doesn't even exist.

With a token picture of a black man. I know why he's related to the story, but his race must have been very convenient for them.

(http://undefined)

Do the right think the BLM movement is only opposed to statues?

They hate everyone who isn't like them and just assume that every hooman is the same.


Mark Steel
@mrmarksteel
·
5m
I'm going to write a column called 'How long before Richard Littlejohn wanks into the Holy Grail and sprinkles it on a statue of Dame Vera Lynn'? Well, he might do.