Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Pook?  (Read 11064 times)
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36318




« Reply #30 on: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 17:09:16 »

Perhaps Pook has a similar clause in his contract as he had last time, so keep him back for dire emergencies only in that case.
Logged
tans
You spin me right round baby right round

Offline Offline

Posts: 25112





Ignore
« Reply #31 on: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 17:38:26 »

I agree with the suggestion of Pook in midfield ... I have always believed him without question better than Timlin and on his day better than Easton .. I believe at the very least a three man midfield of Easton, Pook and Nalis would serve us much better in the long run than what we have been playing with.



You have to be joking surely?

Hes not in the team for a reason - ie shit.
Logged
chalkies_shorts

« Reply #32 on: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 18:38:19 »

Agree there.

Disagree. From what I've seen so far he's so far off the pace that the game will just pass him by. The only thing he offers in midfield is an aerial presence. He's not done it so far in midfield and he ain't going to start doing it now. 
Logged
Rich Pullen

« Reply #33 on: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 18:40:59 »

You have to be joking surely?

Hes not in the team for a reason - ie shit.

The fact that no one wants him speaks volumes.
Logged
herthab
TEF Travel

Offline Offline

Posts: 12020





Ignore
« Reply #34 on: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 18:41:55 »

I agree with the suggestion of Pook in midfield ... I have always believed him without question better than Timlin and on his day better than Easton .. I believe at the very least a three man midfield of Easton, Pook and Nalis would serve us much better in the long run than what we have been playing with.




I think that Pook isn't as bad as some people make out. But better than Timlin and Easton?

No fucking way
Logged

It's All Good..............
BANGKOK RED

« Reply #35 on: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 18:52:48 »

Methinks that Fatters is angling.
Logged
Rich Pullen

« Reply #36 on: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 19:00:53 »

Methinks that Fatters is angling.

Anyone else, sure. Not Fatbury.

Grin
Logged
JOHNNY REEVES

« Reply #37 on: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 19:02:03 »

pook is shit     fact
Logged
the goat

Offline Offline

Posts: 147




Ignore
« Reply #38 on: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 19:41:06 »

wise played him, sturrock played him malpass doesn't?
Logged
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick

Offline Offline

Posts: 16354





Ignore
« Reply #39 on: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 19:43:08 »

Thats it!! Pook holds the key for malpas
Logged

Things get better but they never get good
flammableBen

« Reply #40 on: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 19:54:04 »

Holy shit!!! I hope he reads the TEF. That'll be a fucking revelation!
Logged
Spencer_White

« Reply #41 on: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 20:12:24 »

Fucks sake.

Pook is pure relegation fodder in League 1. Same as Ricky Shakes, Gareth Whalley, Tony Thorpe, Jack Smith, Nicky Nicolau, Jamie Cureton (with a contract get out clause), and a pissed up Christian Roberts.
Logged
suttonred

Offline Offline

Posts: 12510





Ignore
« Reply #42 on: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 20:25:30 »

Nice thought train, although you forgot smith and ifil!! As as much as we like them i think they need to be put in the same bracket.
Logged
tans
You spin me right round baby right round

Offline Offline

Posts: 25112





Ignore
« Reply #43 on: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 20:48:11 »

To be honest i didnt think Nicolau was that bad in the games he played.

I wonder how my mate Gareth Whalley is getting on these, hopefully unemployed...
Logged
Don Rogers Shop

« Reply #44 on: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 21:25:12 »

Cant believe i got 3 pages out of this, like fuck pook is the answer and i cant believe some of you would still play him
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7   Go Up
Print
Jump to: