Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Mick Harford?  (Read 5818 times)
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #30 on: Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 18:09:54 »

At the AGM Holt said that the old job of CE was being split 3 ways, with resposibilities accruing to King for footballing matters, Mike Sullivan for other stuff and Gray for money.

 So in effect King was upgraded to a sort of overview role at that point.....the Board love him, so its entirely logical that it is being recognised in his title.

 I daresay he might even get a little plate to stick on his office door.
Logged
reeves4england

Offline Offline

Posts: 15994


We'll never die!




Ignore
« Reply #31 on: Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 20:38:57 »

Quote from: "alex"
Quote from: "dave_m_russell"
Ushering King upstairs would be insane. We can hardly afford the current wage bill, moving him upstairs and adding in a new contract, well, I beleive thats called creating your own monster.

true, but remember there is no chief executive anymore so now they have cut that job off the wage bill, maybe teh club can afford to employ a director of football and a manager
The club cant afford to pay the players, let alone an extra manager!
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: