Arriba
 Offline
Posts: 21289
|
 |
« Reply #60 on: Tuesday, February 15, 2011, 09:16:55 » |
|
today i'm about 30-70 that we'll stay up.
this is subject to change though
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Benzel
Offline
Posts: 6153
|
|
« Reply #61 on: Tuesday, February 15, 2011, 10:02:55 » |
|
Sums up my thoughts perfectley Berniman.
The team need something to get them going again, they dont seem to want to play for Wilson anymore, lets hope that changes because, as you said, I would be surprised if they changed it now.
This is such bullshit. If that was the case why the positive reaction from everyone that went to Colchester? The adver have been pretty damning in the last couple of weeks and even they were full of praise. People repeat the same tired bullshit lines that have been going on all season. (here comes the inevitable comparison to Wilson) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Is your cat making too much noise all the time?
|
|
|
Ardiles
Offline
Posts: 11528
Stirlingshire Reds
|
|
« Reply #62 on: Tuesday, February 15, 2011, 10:08:03 » |
|
today i'm about 30-70 that we'll stay up.
this is subject to change though
My Staying Up Probability Indicator currently stands at 20%. A win tonight would see that edge up to 25%, maybe even slightly higher. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BANGKOK RED
|
|
« Reply #63 on: Tuesday, February 15, 2011, 10:33:49 » |
|
Interesting to see on FF that most other clubs have us as not going down, some even as high as 16th.
I wish I shared their confidence.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
|
« Reply #64 on: Tuesday, February 15, 2011, 12:18:24 » |
|
Or Dean Ashton?
SO many potentials for droll sarcasm, thinking about it you're probably right. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
london_red
Offline
Posts: 2142
|
|
« Reply #65 on: Tuesday, February 15, 2011, 12:31:35 » |
|
My tongue was firmly in cheek there. Si Pie did seem to be the chief proponent of that particular rumour at the time though.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ScillyRed
|
|
« Reply #66 on: Friday, February 18, 2011, 19:22:10 » |
|
Reported on South West news tonight that Plymouth Argyle had not gone into administration, but seemed to intimate (between the lines)that they might on Monday - you heard it hear first  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Doctor Bamber
|
|
« Reply #67 on: Friday, February 18, 2011, 19:41:23 » |
|
would argyle lose their points this season or next then? next season is no bloody good to us.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Frigby Daser
Offline
Posts: 3828
|
|
« Reply #68 on: Friday, February 18, 2011, 20:09:52 » |
|
This season if it's within the next month or so. Sorry state of affairs of we, of all clubs, want another into administration. Look after no 1 I suppose...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ronnie21
Offline
Posts: 6146
The Mighty Hankerton
|
|
« Reply #69 on: Friday, February 18, 2011, 20:10:38 » |
|
would argyle lose their points this season or next then? next season is no bloody good to us.
Once administration is confirmed I think it is an automatic penalty for this season - Leeds tried to bypass that and got clobbered for the next season, as did Southampton. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Barry Scott
Offline
Posts: 9113
|
|
« Reply #70 on: Friday, February 18, 2011, 20:15:53 » |
|
If the points would keep them up, don't they get deducted this season, but if they'd go down even with the deduction don't they get them next season? (I think I'm making this up.)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mrverve
Offline
Posts: 1429
|
|
« Reply #71 on: Friday, February 18, 2011, 20:50:47 » |
|
This season if it's within the next month or so. Sorry state of affairs of we, of all clubs, want another into administration. Look after no 1 I suppose...
Were not going to get relegated regardless of whether Argyle go in to administration or not. I think we'll finish above them whatever happens. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mrverve
Offline
Posts: 1429
|
|
« Reply #72 on: Friday, February 18, 2011, 20:56:28 » |
|
If the points would keep them up, don't they get deducted this season, but if they'd go down even with the deduction don't they get them next season? (I think I'm making this up.)
I think so yes. Leeds tried to go into administration at half time when they knew they were going to get relegated instead of going into administration after the game knowing that the points deduction would come the next season. In the end the FL deducted them 25 points (I think) for the start of the new season? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Benzel
Offline
Posts: 6153
|
|
« Reply #73 on: Friday, February 18, 2011, 21:22:36 » |
|
Nah they lost 10 at the end of the season they went down and started on -15. I think...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Is your cat making too much noise all the time?
|
|
|
mrverve
Offline
Posts: 1429
|
|
« Reply #74 on: Friday, February 18, 2011, 21:26:49 » |
|
Nah they lost 10 at the end of the season they went down and started on -15. I think...
I thought it was more than that. I remember Wise coming out and criticising the FL because of the deduction. They were quality that year and got to the PO final. Without the deduction they would have finished in the top two. Edit: Your right, -15 they started on. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: Friday, February 18, 2011, 21:32:19 by mrverve »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
