Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: Elsterap on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 17:36:16 Rhys 7 - Did what he had to apart from the goal
J Smith 6 - Mostly anonymous but made a couple of good tackles Ifil 6 - Not up to usual but mainly because other people done what he usually does. O'Hanlon 6 - Not much to do for most of game Nicho 6 - Same as O'Hanlon Shakes 8 - Good runs, excellent passes, done well to get a head on the ball for goal MOTM Brown 7 - Good runs, good passes, sometimes didnt do what he needed to CCP 7 - Done well, came back when needed, good goal P Smith 7 - Pretty Solid through most of game, more quiet towards end Peacock 7 - Came back a lot to midfield to tackle, didnt always get into centre forward position for Shakes's or Brown's runs. Cureton 7 - Played the target man and got onto some long balls from Shakes well. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Holgate 5 - Too weak to stay on the ball for too ong. Didnt try hard enough to get the ball. With the fairies. Gurney 6 - Not good enough. Overall a very entertaining game, which we dominated for most of the game. The last 15-30minutes were quite worrying with Swindon playing far too deeply. Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: Johno on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 17:59:42 Rhys 7
Smith 7 Ifil 7 O Hanlon 7 Nicho 7 Shakes 8 Brown 7 CCP 7 Smith 7 Peacock 7 Cureton 7 Holgate 5. He was awful. end of Gurney 6. was just there really. cant be bothered to write loads at the moment. Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: Spud on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:01:30 Holgate 3 - was put in and decided to fall over the ball!
Shakes was my MOTM for the 2nd game running. Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: my-velocity on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:01:56 Quote from: "Johno" Rhys 7 Smith 7 Ifil 7 O Hanlon 7 Nicho 7 Shakes 8 Brown 7 CCP 7 Smith 7 Peacock 7 Cureton 7 Holgate 5. He was awful. end of Gurney 6. was just there really. cant be bothered to write loads at the moment. I agree with this one. Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: dogs on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:11:18 Rhys 7 - Not too much to do but some good claims
Smith 5 - gave the ball away too much, and allowed players goal side Ifil 7 - Positional play a lot better and solid O Hanlon 7 Won nearly everything but needs to improve his clearances (as usual) Nicho 7 - Reliable again Shakes 9 - MOTM ran for everywhere today and obviously got us a goal Brown 8 - Like Shakes but without the goal CCP 8 - All over the pitch and a good finish Smith 7 - Showed an experienced head with some good passing Peacock 7 - Battled for everything, some nice touches and good flick ons Cureton 7 - Some very good crosses and a great flick for CCP's goal Holgate 3 - Less said the better Gurney 4 - definitely noticed the difference (i.e. we got shit and more overrun in the midfield when he was brought on for Comyn-Platt). Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: STFC Village on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:19:06 Evans 6 - Steady i s'pose, made a few half decent saves, no chance with the goal
J Smith 7 - Looked a lot more solid at the back than Jenks has been recently Ifil 7 - Steady, distribution still dreadful, but can't fault his defensive capabilities O'Hanlon 6 - Continues his poor recent form, weak link at the back Nicholas 7 - Solid as per usual atm CCP 8 - Really well taken goal. Workhorse of the side Shakes 8 - Becoming a very dangerous player on the wing, full of running, worked hard. Nice finish for his goal :D Brown 8 - Full of running and made a great interception late on P Smith 7 - Didn't look out of place considering it was his first 90 minutes for 2 months Peacock 7 - Held up ball well, good flick-ons, starting to gel with Curo Cureton 7 - Lovely assist for the winner, linked up well with Cock Holgate 4. Thought that was a poor choice of substitution really, should have brought on Trev Gurney 6 Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: aroundthefur on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:21:00 > should have brought on Trev
Benjamin wasn't even on the bench! BBC Wiltshire reported he's out for three weeks with injury earlier this afternoon. Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: STFC Village on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:21:55 Quote from: "aroundthefur" > should have brought on Trev Whoops! Still shouldn't have brought on the inexperienced Holgate at that stage of the gameBenjamin wasn't even on the bench! BBC Wiltshire reported he's out for three weeks with injury earlier this afternoon. Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: Sade on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:22:55 Shakes - 9 8)
Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: Arriba on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:36:22 o'hanlon was superb.at least a 7,won header after header.
i thought cureton or paul smith were the pick of the players. shakes did well but the odd poor touch. brown and nicholas were the weakest players that started but both were ok. gurney was acting like a twat and holgate was dire. but generally a good day for all. Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: Panda Paws on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:38:15 I'd probably average out at seven, with the exception of Shakes - deffo 9, although he got quite tired by the end.
Peacock deserved at least 8, he was superb today. Just the type of gritty player we need! Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: DiV on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:38:38 Evans - 6 - Nothing to do really
J.Smith - 6 - Solid(ish) certainly more solid than Jenks has been Ifil - 6 - Not up to the high standard he has set recently, lost his position for the goal...not something he has done for a while O'Hanlon - 6 - Strong in the air Nicholas - 6 - Generally solid, still worried me a few times today Shakes - 8 - Full of running, much better crosses some lovely cross field balls to Cureton. Just needs to realise when he has time on the ball and when he hasnt P.Smith - 7 - Thought he was very good, won tackle after tackle and used the ball well, also cushioned his headers to team members, no one at Swindon ever does that. Would have got my man of the match but faded last 15. Clearly not 100% fit but for 75/80 minutes bossed midfield CCP - 7 - Very good game, lot of hard work. Very well taken goal. Looked much better with him on the pitch than without Brown - 6 - Good game, lots of running Cureton - 7 - Worked his nuts off, some good touches as well Peacock - 7 - Powerhouse! Subs. Gurney - 4 - All he seemed to do was foul and kick the ball in the air!! Holgate - 3 - Just wanted that extra 2nd that he didnt have Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: Arriba on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:42:24 Quote from: "DV85" Evans - 6 - Nothing to do really J.Smith - 6 - Solid(ish) certainly more solid than Jenks has been Ifil - 6 - Not up to the high standard he has set recently, lost his position for the goal...not something he has done for a while O'Hanlon - 6 - Strong in the air Nicholas - 6 - Generally solid, still worried me a few times today Shakes - 8 - Full of running, much better crosses some lovely cross field balls to Cureton. Just needs to realise when he has time on the ball and when he hasnt P.Smith - 7 - Thought he was very good, won tackle after tackle and used the ball well, also cushioned his headers to team members, no one at Swindon ever does that. Would have got my man of the match but faded last 15. Clearly not 100% fit but for 75/80 minutes bossed midfield CCP - 7 - Very good game, lot of hard work. Very well taken goal. Looked much better with him on the pitch than without Brown - 6 - Good game, lots of running Cureton - 7 - Worked his nuts off, some good touches as well Peacock - 7 - Powerhouse! Subs. Gurney - 4 - All he seemed to do was foul and kick the ball in the air!! Holgate - 3 - Just wanted that extra 2nd that he didnt have agree mostly,but wouldn't score shakes so high.also o'hanlon deseves a 7. p smith or curo for me as mom Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: yeo on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:44:54 insane.
Shakes was far and away man of the match. Were still going down though. (must remain negative its worked so far) Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: Spud on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:46:45 Yes i agree, everybody so far has said how good Shakes was.
Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: DiV on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:46:52 Quote from: "Yeovil Red" insane. Shakes was far and away man of the match. Were still going down though. (must remain negative its worked so far) Where did you disapear to for the 2nd half...? Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: my-velocity on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:50:24 Quote from: "STFC Village" Quote from: "aroundthefur" > should have brought on Trev Whoops! Still shouldn't have brought on the inexperienced Holgate at that stage of the gameBenjamin wasn't even on the bench! BBC Wiltshire reported he's out for three weeks with injury earlier this afternoon. Peacock was injured. Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: Arriba on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:50:42 Quote from: "Yeovil Red" insane. Shakes was far and away man of the match. Were still going down though. (must remain negative its worked so far) played well but has a poor first touch and is clumsy, delivery of crosses is not great.good work rate and endeavour though. Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: yeo on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:50:53 The other end of the stand.
we are roaming fans. Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: DiV on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:52:03 Quote from: "Yeovil Red" The other end of the stand. we are roaming fans. Yep 1st half you were two rows in front of moi....then you disapeared and never came back....which....is actually the norm for you Yeovil :D Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: richiestfc on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:52:18 Quote from: "dogs" Rhys 7 - Not too much to do but some good claims Smith 5 - gave the ball away too much, and allowed players goal side Ifil 7 - Positional play a lot better and solid O Hanlon 7 Won nearly everything but needs to improve his clearances (as usual) Nicho 7 - Reliable again Shakes 9 - MOTM ran for everywhere today and obviously got us a goal Brown 8 - Like Shakes but without the goal CCP 8 - All over the pitch and a good finish Smith 7 - Showed an experienced head with some good passing Peacock 7 - Battled for everything, some nice touches and good flick ons Cureton 7 - Some very good crosses and a great flick for CCP's goal Holgate 3 - Less said the better Gurney 4 - definitely noticed the difference (i.e. we got shit and more overrun in the midfield when he was brought on for Comyn-Platt). i agree with everything there!! Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: yeo on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:53:28 Ah didnt notice,went and sat 2 rows behind Ralphy :o
Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: richiestfc on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:55:13 stfcvillage how comes you gave gurney a 6??seriously he lacked everything today.. truly awfull in my opinion! :shock: :?
Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: Spud on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:56:15 Quote from: "stfcbeckett" Quote from: "STFC Village" Quote from: "aroundthefur" > should have brought on Trev Whoops! Still shouldn't have brought on the inexperienced Holgate at that stage of the gameBenjamin wasn't even on the bench! BBC Wiltshire reported he's out for three weeks with injury earlier this afternoon. Peacock was injured. AGAIN! :| Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: DiV on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 18:58:37 Quote from: "Spuddy_STFC" Quote from: "stfcbeckett" Quote from: "STFC Village" Quote from: "aroundthefur" > should have brought on Trev Whoops! Still shouldn't have brought on the inexperienced Holgate at that stage of the gameBenjamin wasn't even on the bench! BBC Wiltshire reported he's out for three weeks with injury earlier this afternoon. Peacock was injured. AGAIN! :| By injured, he means he had cramp....which is understanable he has gone from not playing much football to playing 3 games in 8 days.... Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: Reeves for King on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 19:16:22 Is it just me or did you think Sean played fucking well? I am perhaps his biggest critic and wonder what he brings the team, but I thought he was fucking excellent today. He won absolutely everything, and had a fantastic game. Centre-Backs should really be judged on how little you notice them as it means they haven't made any mistakes, and Sean fits into that category today. Sean - 8.
Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: Batch on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 20:32:51 Seano played well. I also think Ifil was outstanding, excluding his distribution. He lost the battle of the 'fros though.
Shakes MOTM. P Smith would have ran him close but he tired after about 60 min. Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: Elsterap on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 20:43:57 Quote from: "Batch" He lost the battle of the 'fros though. Beaten by a worthy winner though. Was one hell of a fro. Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: adje on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 21:05:10 Quote from: "richiestfc" stfcvillage how comes you gave gurney a 6??seriously he lacked everything today.. truly awfull in my opinion! :shock: :? People are coming round to my way of thinking-Gurney is shit,worst signing Iffy has made. Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: Elsterap on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 21:33:07 Gurney was good against Bournemouth and Swansea though. And at least deserved of a place in a few other games this season too.
Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: Arriba on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 21:48:35 Quote from: "adje" Quote from: "richiestfc" stfcvillage how comes you gave gurney a 6??seriously he lacked everything today.. truly awfull in my opinion! :shock: :? People are coming round to my way of thinking-Gurney is shit,worst signing Iffy has made. he isn't shit when he concentrates on playing football instead of losing his head. today he needed to steady the ship,but didn't do that. i still think he is a good signing though Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: adje on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 22:24:01 Quote from: "Elsterap" Gurney was good against Bournemouth and Swansea though. And at least deserved of a place in a few other games this season too. Swansea let him play -that speaks volumes.Thought he was anonymous against the jacks-but,to be fair,didn't see the Bmuff game(he was shite v Southend and Walsall though) Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: dogs on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 22:26:29 I've always thought Gurney was shit. He was a liability the last time he was here, and tbh I loved it when he went. I would have said in our position till the end of the season would have been ample. But seeing as he's around till 2007 I agree it's a bad signing.
Today I just had that bad feeling we'd start to fuck up/decline when he came on. Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: Spud on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 22:34:03 Im glad he re-signed although he was shit today, even though he only played about 15 minutes.
Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: richiestfc on Saturday, February 4, 2006, 23:56:42 again ive always thought he was shit and you could see he wasn't preforming at all and in effect was just useless :(
Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: DiV on Sunday, February 5, 2006, 00:07:15 Gurney is generally only shite when Adje comes to watch him :shock:
When Adje isnt there he plays well..... Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: Compo on Sunday, February 5, 2006, 00:15:05 I thought J.Smith played well, allthough Shakes was heads above all our players and what the fuck is holgate doing..............
Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: DMR on Sunday, February 5, 2006, 15:25:16 I thought they all did well apart from the subs.
Shakes motm again. Title: Ratings v Donny Post by: Spud on Sunday, February 5, 2006, 15:29:39 Quote from: "dave_m_russell" I thought they all did well apart from the subs. Shakes motm again. :nod: |