yeah, it's just massively more risky IMO.
not really a rocket science statement. Spending more money on proven quality derisks things. proven players are generally older than 23.
that's not too say there are any guarantees either way. I just know which approach is more likely to take us to oblivion...
Just think that our mix has gone too far the way of youth & potential.
I know it's only one game but even just the presence of Ince had a big impact on the team Saturday.
Imagine what adding someone like Greer as well might have done